2009 Calendar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Crossroads in Eden: the Development of Fort Lupton, 1835-2000
CROSSROADS IN EDEN: THE DEVELOPMENT OF FORT LUPTON, 1835-2000 A HISTORICAL CONTEXT Submitted to: Historic Preservation Board City of Fort Lupton, Weld County, Colorado Prepared by: Adam Thomas SWCA Environmental Consultants State Historical Fund Project 02-02-075, Deliverable 3: Fort Lupton Historic Survey and Context SWCA Cultural Resource Report 2003-141 October 2003 CROSSROADS IN EDEN: DEVELOPMENT OF FORT LUPTON, 1835-2000 A HISTORICAL CONTEXT Submitted to: Historic Preservation Board City of Fort Lupton, Weld County, Colorado Prepared by: Adam Thomas SWCA Inc. Environmental Consultants 8461 Turnpike Drive Suite 100 Westminster, Colorado 80031 Bill Martin, Project Manager Kevin W. Thompson, Principal Investigator State Historical Fund Project 02-02-075, Deliverable 3: Fort Lupton Historic Survey and Context SWCA Cultural Resource Report 2003-141 October 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: Timeless Connections iv A Note on Sources v Chapter 1: South Platte River Basin Prehistory to 1860 1 European Exploration 2 • Fort Lupton and Early Settlers 6 Chapter 2: A City Develops 12 Commercial and Civic Development 14 • Residential Development 17 • Social Life and Entertainment 20 • Public Services and Utilities 22 • Churches 24 • Schools 26 Chapter 3: The Freighter’s Campground: History of Transportation in Fort Lupton 28 Stage Lines and Toll Roads 28 • Railroads 29 • The Automobile Age 33 Chapter 4: Bounty of the Earth: Agriculture, Food-Processing, and the Oil and Gas Industries 37 Ranching 37 • Farming and Irrigation 39 • Food-Processing Industry 41 • Oil and Gas 46 Chapter 5: A Town of Diversity: Ethnic Heritage of Fort Lupton 48 Germans from Russia 48 • Hispanics 50 • Japanese 55 Conclusion: A Historical Crossroads 58 Notes 59 Bibliography 66 FIGURES, MAPS, AND TABLES Fig. -
Bilevel Rail Car - Wikipedia
Bilevel rail car - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilevel_rail_car Bilevel rail car The bilevel car (American English) or double-decker train (British English and Canadian English) is a type of rail car that has two levels of passenger accommodation, as opposed to one, increasing passenger capacity (in example cases of up to 57% per car).[1] In some countries such vehicles are commonly referred to as dostos, derived from the German Doppelstockwagen. The use of double-decker carriages, where feasible, can resolve capacity problems on a railway, avoiding other options which have an associated infrastructure cost such as longer trains (which require longer station Double-deck rail car operated by Agence métropolitaine de transport platforms), more trains per hour (which the signalling or safety in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The requirements may not allow) or adding extra tracks besides the existing Lucien-L'Allier station is in the back line. ground. Bilevel trains are claimed to be more energy efficient,[2] and may have a lower operating cost per passenger.[3] A bilevel car may carry about twice as many as a normal car, without requiring double the weight to pull or material to build. However, a bilevel train may take longer to exchange passengers at each station, since more people will enter and exit from each car. The increased dwell time makes them most popular on long-distance routes which make fewer stops (and may be popular with passengers for offering a better view).[1] Bilevel cars may not be usable in countries or older railway systems with Bombardier double-deck rail cars in low loading gauges. -
Colorado Railcar's DMU Brochure
ColoradoColorado RailcarRailcar NewNew DMUDMU Meets the FRA’s newest CFR part 238 specifications Member of APTA’S Built in the USA Colorado Railcar All New Single Level Aero DMU Colorado Railcar’s All New Glass Domed Aero-DMU Proposed For The Alaska Railroad Powered By Twin 600 Horse Power Detroit Diesels With Voith Hydrodynamic Transmissions Meets The FRA’s Newest CFR Part 238 Specifications 2 Colorado Railcar The New, Highly Evolved DMU is Winning Acceptance The DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) concept has always been a winner. Today, we are seeing a revival of the RDC/DMUs of the 50’s albeit in a sleeker, safer, environmentally friendlier and more powerful form. And DMUs are garnering favor now for the very same reasons they were popular then; cost advantages, operational flexibility, and reliability. Colorado Railcar, a high-end custom railcar manufacturer, has developed the first and only DMU meeting all FRA, APTA, ADA and AMTRAK requirements. As moderate volume, inter-city, suburban and rural commuter services become more important, the DMU emerges as the most promising solution. Outperforming locomotive hauled consists in flexibility, acceleration, and deceleration, DMUs provide a favorable cost/benefit ratio that is starting to be recognized nationwide. Colorado Railcar’s FRA approved steel tube construction, state-of-the-art engine/drive train and freight compatible structure make it suitable for mixed use with existing freight rail, often a crucial factor in developing cost effective service. Please review the following material on Colorado Railcar’s new DMU that is changing the way America looks at inter-city and suburban commuter rail. -
Location/Jurisdiction Codes for Sales Tax Filing
DR 0800 (09/16/20) Location/Jurisdiction Codes for Sales Tax Filing Sales tax filers with one or more locations/sites may districts collection needed. For example, for sales in file on Revenue Online or by XML (Extensible Markup unincorporated Arapahoe County, use the code 10-0208 Language). Filers with two or more locations/sites may because SCFD is associated with the entire county. file using a prescribed Excel spreadsheet. A list of XML For businesses such as telecommunication or utility approved software vendors is available on the website companies that make sales in unincorporated areas at www.colorado.gov/pacific/tax/file-sales-tax-online. of any Colorado county but do not have a physical Use of department-approved XML software does not location in such areas, the Department has removed require individual approval.For the Excel spreadsheet, the use the code “0207” and taxpayers simply need to there is a template and handbook on the website at use the “0206” or “0208” when appropriate. www.colorado.gov/pacific/tax/sales-tax-spreadsheet-filing. To add non-physical locations for the state-collected Use of the Excel spreadsheet requires pre-approval by the jurisdictions in Colorado: department before it can be used. When you file sales tax returns by paper or XML/Excel 1. Identify the jurisdiction you need to add. spreadsheet, you must use the six digit location/ jurisdiction 2. If you are a registered user, log in to Revenue codes. The location/jurisdiction code is determined by Online. On the Sales Tax page, in the “I Want To”, the location address of the actual physical site location click on “Add Non-Physical Locations.” If you are or place of delivery. -
WSK Commuter Rail Study
Oregon Department of Transportation – Rail Division Oregon Rail Study Appendix I Wilsonville to Salem Commuter Rail Assessment Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Team Parsons Brinckerhoff Simpson Consulting Sorin Garber Consulting Group Tangent Services Wilbur Smith and Associates April 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? ................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA....................................................................................................................... 4 WES COMMUTER RAIL.......................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR .................................................................. 6 OUTREACH WITH RAILROADS: PNWR AND BNSF .................................................................. 7 PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD........................................................................................... 7 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY ..................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS.................................................................................................. -
Rail Vehicle Fleet
TRIMET’S RAIL VEHICLE FLEET Type 1 light rail vehicles • The low-floor design is 14 inches above top of rail (empty) for use with a 10-inch platform Several classes of light rail vehicles (LRV) operate on the TriMet system. The first class is referred to as Type • An ADA ramp provides access for riders in 1. Between 1984 and 1986, 26 LRVs were purchased mobility devices for the original Eastside MAX line and manufactured • The low-floor center section makes up 70 percent of by Bombardier. Each car has run reliably for more than the floor area, with interior steps to the high-floor one million miles since their first arrival. section that rests atop the power trucks Type 3 LRVs TriMet ordered 17 Type 3 LRVs from Siemens for the Interstate MAX Yellow Line, and 10 more for ridership growth. These LRVs are essentially the same as the Type 2 vehicles, except they have automatic passenger counters and improved air conditioning systems. Type 1 specifications • Six-axle, single-articulated vehicles, 89-feet long • Vehicles have high floors and interior steps for use with low platforms Type 2 low-floor cars In 1992 TriMet conducted a “Level Boarding Study” on low-floor vehicles and concluded that they were the least costly way to provide universal, level boarding on the entire light rail system. This feature eases boarding for people using mobility devices. Type 4 LRVs TriMet first ordered 35 Type 2 low-floor LRVs for the A new low-floor vehicle was built for the light rail Westside Light Rail Project, supplied by Siemens and project that became the MAX Green Line. -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts. See instruction in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter N/A" for "not applicable." Tor functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Ottesen Grain Company Feed Mill__________________________ other names/site number Fort Lupton Feed Mill: La Familia Restaurant: 5WL2708___________ 2. Location ^ —————— street & number 815 7th Street [N/A] not for publication city or town Fort Lupton ___ [N/A] vicinity state Colorado code CO county Weld code 123 zip code 80621 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [X] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant [ ] nationally [ ] statewide [X] locally. -
Reynolds Addition and Reynolds Second Addition Intensive Survey
May 14, 2020 Reynolds Addition and Reynolds Second Addition Intensive Survey Historic Residential Intensive-Level Survey – Phase II Certified Local Government Grant No. CO-19-10005 Fort Lupton, Colorado Prepared For: City of Fort Lupton 130 S. McKinley Avenue Fort Lupton, Colorado, 80621 Pinyon Project No.: 119131901 May 14, 2020 Reynolds Addition and Reynolds Second Addition Intensive Survey Historic Residential Intensive-Level Survey – Phase II Certified Local Government Grant No. CO-19-10005 Fort Lupton, Colorado Prepared For: City of Fort Lupton 130 S. McKinley Avenue Fort Lupton, Colorado, 80621 Pinyon Project No.: 119131901 Prepared by: ____________________ Sean Fallon Reviewed by: ____________________ Ashley Bushey “The activity that is the subject of this material has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Historic Preservation Act, administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior for History Colorado. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or History Colorado, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or History Colorado.” “This program received Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally-assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. -
Plot Outline
The Fur Trade in Colorado: A Selected Bibliography and Chronology Compiled by Ben Fogelberg Assistant Editor, Colorado Historical Society Brief Chronology 1806 Returning from their journey to the Pacific, Lewis and Clark meet trappers heading west 1815 A.P. Chouteau and Jules De Mun party first large fur brigade to upper Arkansas and southern Rockies 1822 William Ashley’s famous call for “enterprising young men” 1823 Arikara Battle temporarily closes Missouri River to trade, inspires “Rocky Mountain trapping system” whereby trappers travel overland to interior West and rely on rendezvous for re-supply 1825 Rocky Mountain Fur Company’s first rendezvous 1826 Ashley sells Rocky Mountain Fur Company to William Sublette, David Jackson, Jedediah Smith 1830 Smith, Jackson, Sublette sell Rocky Mountain Fur Co. to Thomas Fitzpatrick, Jim Bridger, Milton Sublette, Henry Fraeb, Jean Baptiste Gervais 1830 William Sublette takes first supply wagons to mountains, does not cross Divide 1831 Jedediah Smith killed by Comanches on Cimarron Cutoff, Santa Fe Trail 1833 Bent’s Fort constructed 1834 Astor’s American Fur Co. buys out Rocky Mountain Fur Co. 1835 Fort Vasquez established on the South Platte by Andrew Sublette and Louis Vasquez 1836 Fort Lupton established on the South Platte by Lancaster P. Lupton (possibly 1837) 1837 Fort Jackson established on the South Platte by Peter Sarpy and Henry Fraeb 1837 Fort St. Vrain established on the South Platte by Bent and St. Vrain 1838 Bent and St. Vrain purchase Fort Jackson from Sarpy and Fraeb 1842 El Pueblo established on Arkansas River 1843 Fort Bridger established, marks traditional end of the fur trade era, though limited trapping and fur/hide trading continues 1 Bibliography Selected sources on the fur trade in Colorado, with general works on the fur trade in the Rocky Mountain West. -
HISTORIC TRAIL MAP of the GREELEY 1° X 2° QUADRANGLE, COLORADO and WYOMING
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY HISTORIC TRAIL MAP OF THE GREELEY 1° x 2° QUADRANGLE, COLORADO AND WYOMING By Glenn R. ScottI and Carol Rein Shwayder2 Pamphlet to accompany MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATIONS SERIES MAP 1-2326 IU.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo. 2Unicom Ventures, Greeley, Colo. CONTENTS Introduction 1 Unsolved Problems 1 Method of Preparation of the Historic Trail Map 1 Acknowledgments 3 Agricultural Colonies Founded in the Greeley Quadrangle 4 Indian Trails in the Greeley Quadrangle 4 Chronology of Some Major Historical Events 5 Railroads in the Greeley Quadrangle 13 People and the Dates they were Associated with Places in the Greeley Quadrangle in the Early Days 13 Some Toll Roads and Bridges in the Greeley Quadrangle 27 Sources of Information 28 FIGURES 1. Regional Map of the Overland, Mormon, Smoky Hill, Santa Fe, Cherokee, and Oregon Trails 2 2. Sketches of Fort St. Vrain, Fort Vasquez, and Fort Lupton 7 III INTRODUCTION about Indian attacks did not end until the Indians were removed from eastern Colorado in about 1871. Discovery of gold in the Rocky Mountains in central Westward movement of whites into the Great Plains Colorado in 1858 led to the establishment of new trails to area was encouraged by the Homestead Act of 1862. Many the future site of Denver, thence to the gold fields. These persons displaced by the Civil War moved onto the newly trails included the Overland Trail up the South Platte River, opened land even though the Indians were still a potential the Smoky Hill Trail across the dry plains of eastern menace. -
The Journal of E. Willard Smith
THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published Quarterly by The State Historical Society of Colorado Vol. XXVll Denver, Colorado, July, 1950 No. 3 With Fur Traders in Colorado, 1839-40 The Journal of E. Willard Smith 'VITH AN INTRODUCTION AND KOTES BY LEROY R. HAFEN The Journal of E. ""Willard Smith is one of the best records of conditions and activity in the Colorado region during fur trade days. The short-lived trading posts on the South Platte are pictured in operation. The chief actors, now almost legendary, are seen with their ox- and mule-drawn wagons, hauling and packing trade goods to supply their posts and conducting trade with the roving Indians. Mr. Smith takes us over the Santa Fe Trail from the outfitting point of Independence, Missouri, to Bent's Fort on the Arkansas. Then we travel northward over the divide and down the South Platte to the adobe trading post of Fort Vasquez, near present Platteville. Leaving wagons behind, we journey on horseback and with pack-laden mules over the mountains, across North Park, down the Little Snake and to Fort Davy Crockett in the favorite trapper winter resort of wall-encircled Brown's Hole on Green River. Then to escape reprisals from wronged Indians we face midwinter on the continental divide, hole up in drifted snow, and finally emerge with spring at the fort on the South Platte. Then on a mackinaw boat, fashioned from timbers hand-sawed at Fort Vasquez, we place our load of buffalo robes and tongues and commence our voyage down the shallow Platte. After much unloading and re-loading, wading the stream and pulling the boat from sand bars, we finally reach the Missouri and dance upon its muddy flood to reach St. -
2009 Gen.Col
®Metro DIESEL MULTIPLE UNIT (DMU) TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS Contract No. PS4370-2064 Prepared for Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority by [ lffi] LTK Engineering Services March 2009 Gen.Col. TJ ---36540 619.2 L85 APR 1 0 2009 D547 2009 Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) Technical Feasibility Analysis I Contract No. PS4370-2064 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. .. 1 1.1 Purpose of the DMU Technical Feasibility Study ... ...... ........ .. ...... .... ... .. ..... ..... ........... 1 1.1.1 Review of Existing Studies ...... ... ... ........ .... ..... ..... ... .... ...... ....... .. ................... ..... 1 1.1.2 Technical Definition of the Three Study Corridors ......................... .... ... ............ 2 1.1.3 DMU Market Survey .......................... .... .. ...... .. .... ... ........................................... 2 1.1.4 DMU Propulsion Investigation .. ........... .. .. ....... .. ... .... ..... ... ... .... .... ..... .... ... ... .. ...... 2 1.1.5 Review of Existing Operating Agreements .... .. ....... .. .................... ..................... 3 1.1 .6 Corridor Operational Capacity Study .. ... .... .... ... ... ..... ... ...... ....... .... ........... .......... 3 1.1.7 DMU Fleet Maintenance Plan ........................................................ .. .. .. ..... ...... .4 1.1.8 Community Opportunities and Constraints for Overlay DMU Service ..... .... ... .... 4 1.1.9 Costing Methodology