The french wine ”appellations d’origine contrôlée” and the virtues of suspicion Genevieve Teil

To cite this version:

Genevieve Teil. The french wine ”appellations d’origine contrôlée” and the virtues of suspicion. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2009, 13 (2), pp.253-274. ￿10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x￿. ￿hal-01137030￿

HAL Id: hal-01137030 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01137030 Submitted on 30 Mar 2015

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Q3 Q2 Q1 r Contro d’Origine Appellations Wine French The Contro d’Origine appellation them. indications; quieten geographical to to The defenders capacity their their actors. but by market Keywords consumers, efforts deceive the considerable to trigger on ability to an themselves a and be imposing doubts and not raise by may fears, brands AOCs economists’ work of most of itself to strength thousands contrary greatest quality of Finally, nor drinkers. hundreds wine AOCs hosting by signs neither market quality of complex uses a of transforming variety into them, from with Far market cohabited AOCs. have to wine solutions given new role the the the and procedures, itself old quality the as has away acknowledged as sweeping assessors changed, defence the the have the threat accusation, quality nor for after define a accusation to Accusation as the prayed able debate. neither them the have But close concerning answer. to suspicions wine to managed the tried has quality collectively seen have of and actors market these supporters wine that time, quality a same d’Origine of conveying the development Appellations not of At suspected wine been information. have they French reliable invention their the Since products! and about countries other paradoxical highly Contro something is There Agronomique Recherche de National Institut Genevie d’Origine Contro ‘‘Appellations Wine French The pca diinlvledrvdfo hi labelling their from a derived with products value discussed; specific extensively additional empowering by been their special competition have hindering to issues of related suspected These is are value. they or them and property against power intellectual argument economic general main intrinsic the the to systems, adjusting the protection Geographical of as trademark difficulties the opposes GIs’ such 2006). (Josling, the of Rights agreements debate from Property Apart enlargement Intellectual trade Stormy of Aspects the international Trade-related competition. are on through reject they Agreement free area all, or above protection to support But indications hindrance rights. either country’s a which property a of into countries being notion incorporate new of to a easy represent suspected so they course, not develop- Of is sustainable difficulty. that expand- and with are local and (GI) to slowly indications ing related concepts—geographical closely fashionable be very to ment—two claimed are they Although hriradNo 07 ade,20;Jsig 06 Moschini 2006; Josling, 2006; Handler, 2007; Ngo, and Charlier AC) ncutisarayuigGs(rne pi) hyaessetdof suspected are they Spain), (France, GIs using already countries in (AOCs), 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of uiul nuh tlati h aeo ieCnrle peltoso Origin of Appellations Controlled wine of case the in least at enough, Curiously ˆ suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: l e AC) h oete r osdrdt esset h oete xadto expand they more the suspect, be to considered are they more the (AOCs): ees ´ `

UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve iemre raiain rgai oilg;ceiiiy confidence; credibility; sociology; pragmatic organization; market wine ˆ l e’adteVruso Suspicion of Virtues the and ee’’ ´ 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009

ˆ l ee h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The 7 8 ´ ˆ o:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x doi: 7 8 l e (AOCs ees ´ AdradGail,2002; Grazioli, and (Addor 7 8 ) tal et ,2008). ., 7 8 7 8 1 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

2 reooiso at u npamtc Jms 98 96 ple otewine the to where applied and, 1996) 1968; them (James, made pragmatics sociology the actors on on not but the market. article taste an which is of still it on economics Thus, and them. or grounds were counter to accusations tried the The others on-going how reliable. rather the relevant, three or but whether visible describes not valid, AOCs, more establish of article ever are to birth wines the is the between quality here since and differences intention distinguished This the quality, be con- making them. can at over the that against aimed follow responses debate and of then major phases We for successive a AOCs. arguments of fuelled with enactment labelling generated, the they achieved failures, troversies of have taste series of a especially 2004). and Teil, (see market elsewhere wine discussed the and of Methodological presented study 1967). been observations, the (Garfinkel, wines), from ‘‘breaches’’ of arising even retailing difficulties all broad and of and observation, market, generally, consumption wine participant quality production, more the of the to and, another (hundreds is, or users interviews that way one critics, analysis, in text sellers, committed intermediaries data: producers, market of (Teil with types France interviews five in long on procedures lastly, draw differentiation and, I wine Origin; the consequence, of of the Appellations study of the a for study 2001); institute a (Teil, of national lovers study French a wine the 2004); and of (Teil, archives critique Duero wine Del international Ribera and the French in organization market wine Spanish to undertaken suspicion. be that could to what end and an suspicious put become to people try how and either Instead, why are illusions. shows AOCs sociological that it or stating hindrances—information by economic wrong, else or or right reliable is successes. who view and of failures point aims, to epistemological enables their This AOCs, view. of of informa- point account as empirical different an nature a from their quite them of from provide study point effects to to legal and propose linked or I properties economic difficulties signs, their formal, tion the induce a to understand from trying to GIs by suited studying view, of well Instead is use. AOCs, case of actual this number their greatest that the assume and As experience can France. longest in we among the development with Origin and country the of creation is their Appellations France accompanied Controlled have the which users, by their raised controversies the mistaken analyse a not GIs, really mention to they to able are not not And AOCs, are Are protectionism? concept? development? GIs hidden differentiate rural if of their sustain risk debate since to to any almost international able unable there existed the Is has of and credibility? it purpose power achieve new; the not any is is What of suspicion invention! this devoid And being products. between of credibility, lacking Genevie Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of hsatcesat ihteefrso oehCps rnhSntrwo after who, Senator French a Capus, Joseph of efforts the with starts article This the of study a studies: field market wine different several on based is article The an from establish to try not does article this controversy, a of study any Like and follow to proposes article this situation, confusing this clarify to order In ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009

7 8 h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The 7 8 r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 7 8 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The tal et 7 8 ,20) sa As 2007). ., 7 8 7 8 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The n eey rmtenntet etr oeadmr initiatives more and more century nineteenth to the pointed From remedy. market a wine and the know in recognized. to difference dysfunctions producers that and have consumers to enable and to wines quality’’ between To of difference fame. actors, ‘‘signs the former institutional to the of of and result, private series recovery means with a a the along no As created for government, the support copies. had circle provide the vicious producers to this and break able wines and be bad not wines, the would from bad market wines and good their good able differentiate longer between no were distinguish buyers 1970): to (Akerlof, them. situation distinguished lemons that Akerlof’s archetypical standard taste Portuguese the own their from these or of detract that fame Italian least the feared sap at therefore Spanish, would or products They French, wines quality the used. lower show former was even to sometimes recipe the or even same different or of the level though most quality even same as products, the style attain them to taste from regarded failed producers not same they original were because The wines threat to. these a referred But as names process. the winemaking vineyards ‘‘production a a Cham- famous and of the grape Porto, result the of Bordeaux, quality as type wines as a these with as recipe’’: such interpreting them were sold names labelled They etc. winemakers Italian Sherry, —and new pagne, or The Chile Portuguese, grapes. Spanish, real Africa, of French, South made unknown wine, countries bug—Australia, real new products: in phylloxera produced were the They to known. becoming were wines new from lack quality. consumers’ consumers discriminate the protect from to wines ability to quality of considered good of were nineteenth producers drinks measures and late of sellers, of sorts the unscrupulous all number in bought a consumers vineyards ‘‘wine’’, and sold many called producers destroyed which during that and century, crisis phylloxera the After Differentiation Quality a for 2007. Signs in AOCs, des of National charge Institut in the Institute of French reform the the last at of stop (INAO), the absence will d’Origine before we the Appellations century, but on closed twenty-first controversy not the is recent of history turn the The enterprises. to the wine quality small from in wines, of marketing between notion difference the the know of to introduction drinkers enable to invented devices 99,o h rda ea rtcinaantfadadcnue deception, consumer and fraud against (Markham, protection wines legal Bordeaux gradual of the classifications or successive 1999), the namely respect, this in nacuto ‘eos’ yidctn ult,cnueswudmr easily more would consumers quality, suffer indicating to wines By be good to for ‘‘lemons’’. quality dangerous of and bad unjust and account also fraud was for on it normal market, was the it by While penalized brands. of multiplication the 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 7 8 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of sGletGrir(95 oe,fraln ietedfeetcie or crises different the time long a for notes, (1995) Garrier Gilbert As an reached had market the parliament, of members and administrators For and changed, had features some reconstructed were vineyards the time the By successive the to correspond roughly article the of sections main three The suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 7 8 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009

h ult fwine of quality the 7 8 sbt cause a both as 7 8 1 Genevie eetaken were 7 8 ` 2 eTeil ve and 3 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

4 asso ult:‘tecntn,fi n oa rcie’.Yttecut were courts the Yet wines. quality practices’’. made local that practices and good pragmatic the fair the of by set define constant, a left to in ‘‘the unable cases but quality: itself, contested quality the of in solve not causes judgements to their had grounding law, They 1905 courts. the judges: independent the of reflect quality to actual the and than ‘‘political’’ more be interests to wines. and said the authorities were local signs of in the interest efficiency an area, political had quality producer But a every retailers. As to professional criticism. by belonging strong acknowledged raised as signs vineyards, wines quality best early Appellation) these the of (Origin origin d’Origine the on Appellation based called and would administration This production. collapse. their to to tended of demand which the consumers, sale cause among the disappointments repeated facilitate avoid and symmetrically producers good identify ihteACcerctrnigo odax ugny hnCo then Burgundy, Bordeaux, of ranking clear-cut AOC the with simply was things: it doing defined; of not ways was in changes itself for obligation quality an allowed process, of and result assessment framed, the an was it and although means But, wines. of table than quality instance. higher for a acetification, for like defects detect to designed tests and varieties. vines, chemical vine of analytical quality pruning were low the on means yield, prohibition these the a All to as amounted such of which wine, degree, the consisted alcoholic make the to ones limitations allowed and human means constraints in the the resulted in They natural while techniques. The winemaking themselves. characteristics, and AOC viticulture the pedoclimatic of to characteristics’’ producers were had ‘‘particular the wines experts: in elements the best result of the and quality by factors described the human as such, and as natural recognized from be proceed To quality. of definition the Genevie Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of n13 e a ntttdteAOC, the instituted law new a 1935 In towards turning by problem the address to passed was law new a 1919 In local the by delimited were wines quality produce to known vineyards 1905 In ic 95AC aebe atclryscesu.Mn osmr agreed consumers Many successful. particularly been have AOCs 1935 Since aimed AOCs constraints, production and delimitation geographical on Based uigacranpro.[ ]A uaseov,qaiycnol evolve 1985). only can d’Origine, quality Appellations evolve, des humans National quality As of them(Institut .] . notion with [. the period. of certain denying reality a to the during and concerning knowledge, facts technical obvious by and certain driven scientific evolution any of refusing refinement to the amounts way this in festivals. tradition wine Seeing brotherhoods to wine-related aspect many picturesque the a nowadays of lend celebrated rituals tradition, that solemn to and side lavish folklore the the in be processes only .]. or . can [. that practices altered But age-old have humans for nor respect time total neither which as tradition see Many ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve controlled 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: swr hi eutn ie,truhasre of series a through wines, resulting their were as , r 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 7 8

3 hc nlddpoesoa xets in expertise professional included which h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The ˆ e uRho du tes 7 8 ˆ e etc., ne, 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The vn‘fre’ od ob h ihntt iapittercustomers: their disappoint prices—sometimes to not their wish raising the and by level take so to quality do try to the would ‘‘forced’’ lowering they even by acknowledged, was it quality of their advantage Once was not. assessment or were their actually of the wines, credibility AOC The the judged. of and dubious. quality judge therefore effective proprietors although both the But the were quality. assess were wines’ certification evaluators the could and control tasting experts, this strictly to best certification interests performed the this their was be producers it to AOC, The the considered constraints of were of decree. they series denomination the As to tasting. the added was in compulsory, not listed but common quite already rvnigsc amu taeisfrtercamt inf quality. signify to claim their for strategies harmful such preventing nyaogbyr u loaogpouesworaiyrpre upc events, suspect reported readily who producers among also but buyers among only rgnlyAC eessetdo o ugn eutadol fidctn a indicating of only yearly and a result a 1967 judging In not quality. of ‘‘potential’’ suspected were AOCs Originally these Judged success, and this Judge Both with well. along as of But criticisms volumes decades. strong For triggered the for quality. choices constantly Consequently, steadily wines’ good have prices. grown labels the make higher have of to fetch wines question them can AOC difficult allowing wines the tool labelled with practical producers, struggle a to as having label without AOC the see and 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of rnshda neeti liigt eo ihqaiywehrthey quality—whether high a of be to claiming in interest an had Brands h olcievglneo h Oshsntawy ense scpbeof capable as seen been always not has AOCs the of vigilance collective The hsntrlyrsle nassiino ru,o fqaiydtroain not deterioration, quality of or fraud, of suspicion a in resulted naturally This eti euain notntl hyg on ...] a . [. attain - they they down. when that go and they is great unfortunately are particular] reputation, that [in brands certain wine are There red lot. with a deteriorate brands, with happens -What ieapt ie hthv entmee ihinto with tampered been have that wines puts Ribera with fashionable(Interview 36). become p. wrong. that can’t RL, be brands they drinker could to that I wine referring assume but think, I’m can I .] we what . demand, That’s [. huge quality. of a another level from there’s this wine If maintain bring . they . that . or or wines place mix So, they production]. and that [of assume production possibilities can its a we the increase there’s to exceeds has if production it that that brand, believe sometimes certain I a lot. for a demand promoted strong are brands well-known Very eas hydntwn nme(neve ihwn rne LT, drinker wine with 2 enemies(Interview quiet want keeps p.21). everybody don’t And agree? they you because Don’t denounced. be must what suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED deteriorate? always brands good do Why PROOF 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 xpost ex

7 8 4 atn fACwns hc was which wines, AOC of tasting crianzas 7 8 . 5 hsis This Genevie ` eTeil ve 5 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Q4 6 in distortions and fraud and of winemakers, sorts (Renvois all cellars, market denounce brands, wine to the assessed quick maga- also 1980s, wine were the Journalists and labels. in Guidebooks were these distinguish proliferated commentaries. on, and manoeuvres which to Later notes selfish selections. zines, buyers tasting wine claims, own their empty help their the with and publish to enriched quality to was tried started real labels and false, they honesty, quality the and market, and the supporting true wine of the and quality between reliability wines the quality the for good that keystone for Convinced looking and development. were wines, retailers, brokers, their all of Wine qualities AOCs. journalists: the relative lovers, of to credibility the claim wine the compare could assess to to market, proficiency wine a ability therefore larger an the to expertise, came in broader it professionals when have experts experts, knowledgeable other most wines, the be their to claim could producers While utn nEdt upco:TeWn Critique Wine The Suspicion: to End quality an good a Putting to commitment collective the on pressure up production. stepping to view a with odwns rtc gedta etrqaiyhdt esl thge prices: higher at sold be to had quality better that agreed critics wines, good prices. higher the at supported sold often be prices could of wines hierarchy their better A qualities: of quality. of fame development confirmed in hierarchy the the excellence Critique favoured and for performed emerge. competition conviction collectively of to they of task power started assessment their The wines brands. strengthened the and of claims evaluation quality the to dedicated Genevie Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of lhuhte sdt neln h odbran n arpie fcertain of prices fair and bargains good the underline to used they Although critics wine these all by formed collective a onwards, 1960s late the From h iegoe h rdcdtewn n h eiso favourable for on left relies is who much and the not wine expenses the Clearly, conditions(Renvois transport, produced .], climatic VAT. . who [. finally, packaging, grower and, wine commission labelling, the .] . [. agent’s corking, profits the bottling, retailer’s fees analyses, by œnologists’ .], different . incurred the [. and costs the breeding year, are every for there increase equipment, which of costs, recouping production from apart wine, o esta 5francs. 15 than less for a togcaatrsis seilyaVQ raplaincontro and appellation pleasant or is VDQS that an wine a is local especially it good characteristics, channel, a strong find buying can has the one of that Irrespective think myth. to illusion a is wine good Cheap being from it prevents 1980). and Blouin, and wine pre-eminent(Peynaud connoisseurs, great be taste to protects demanding it bad forcing price against of by barrier high demeaned elite a The places an .] and . [. quality, for prestige of its price product high towards the no contributes the Moreover, be .] would . reserving there [. or wine. expensive, by better more a be making to wine in best point the for logical is It ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x ,19;2004). 1996; e, ´ 7 8 Comment citer cedocument: 7 n has One r ,1996). e, ´ 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 7 8 7 8 oudrtn htt aeabtl of bottle a make to that understand to 7 8

7 8 6 h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The ˆ l 7 8 ee, ´ 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The atraward tells master that strategy guidebook simple ‘‘the A impartiality: impact. own and their ‘‘objectivity’’ ‘‘particular’’ truth’’, asserting their critic’s the merely the reducing signalling in of as consisted thus interpreted be and could taste, definition if a good at a attempt was theirs wine. that about readers judgement their reliable convince samples among only to competition more the growing had the not this they and With themselves, assessments, them. critics for for the asking asked even were without they received more they the be, to appeared frequent: more good and a more of were choice proficiency Denunciations of the taste. lack her grew, or or critics his judgement all of of in reliability at biases number the of of the not about analysis deeper As critique collective were a the wines. required no guides expert within best raged consequently different the controversies and was of endless quality There contrary, scores the 2004). The on Teil, wines. agreement; 1995; the (Ginsburgh, of the correlated quality like demand the large upon a guides with and countries States. in United selections, the also and but critics’ Kingdom France United contests, in only wine not flourished, increased: procedures evaluation h aeadtepie ftebad etiigt nACcnrbtdto contributed AOC an line to a drew pertaining clearly AOC wines. brands which table the sign, and AOC. the differentiation quality within quality the of between a strategy by as prices reliability quality stated its the establishing a constraints and ‘‘minimum’’ in fame the engaged The outstripping wines largely of increased, number The success. aesudpoesoa eonto:apaac nthe in to claimed appearance usually recognition: They professional professionalism. their sound demonstrate have to order in added often 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of oto hmcrflyaoddteqeto fdfiigqaiy nfc,each fact, In quality. defining of question the avoided carefully them of Most critics important more The increased. reliable most the be to claims critics’ The agree not did procedures assessment quality these critiques, all quality like However, of number the developed, strategy differentiation quality the As hnst rtqe h ult taeycudefiinl edt economic to lead efficiently could strategy quality the critique, to Thanks eutn pclto.Hssui crso 0%aegoeqeand 1998). grotesque the someone (Durand, of to are of example due rid typical 100% get A also of to conceit. only but character’s scores not this generates vulgarity. illustrate inaccessible, stupid he merely totally His and that become speculation. demand they power insane resulting that the likes standardized of prices he because the of wines on impact he the an that form of wines such of has a aesthetics wine he the French SCANDALOUS!!—Furthermore, on the towards also on but influence prices strong pushes a on such only shameful have not even can industry, come and man ever improbable single has is a It who that fame. rival inordinate no his having near has of anywhere American (quality?) This colossal. shortcoming is huge influence the whose calamity a truly is Parker suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF ud usr ebr(is dto n1980) in edition (First Gerber Dussert Guide 7 8 10 rmmesi fwl-nw atn uis hs professional These juries. tasting well-known of membership or 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 7 8 8 7 8 9 7 8

u oeagmnswere arguments more But . ieWosWho Who’s Wine Genevie wine a , ` eTeil ve 7 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

8 ihtetoodamo eosrtn h ikbtensgsadqaiy and quality, and signs between link behaviour. the opportunistic of demonstrating signs of down aim hunting link twofold the explicit. the more make quality with to their and was AOCs quality the of of factors human interpretation and sociological natural the the between Quality avoid of to Notion means the of A Definition an distinction. a simply social for that about Looking was speculation, only wines cared pure drinkers of were that prices quality and wine the useless, that were that producer, critiques the show by to constructed tended illusion that ‘‘sociologism’’ of quality. economist’s of efforts interpretation this even could social of critics’ they a spite suspicion; the of with in basis end that the not signs did infer be quality claims can credibility the their we of Yet conclusions. assessment then credibility them, the to helped ascribed buyers importance he results poor the from follows as concluded the and with of scores, lack interfered obtained: critics’ The critics renowned networks. that social accusation of the organize to serve (Ginsburgh also capacity market could their suspected was to definition critics all only quality not the related if some But being of denuncia- credibility. competence its of the support their characteristic: to social assess a appeared the to as quality of tion about and note critics them took among between who controversy internal Drinkers distinguish reputation. to opinion, strove others unanimous while critics between more signs, experts, wavered a personal quality drinkers more for wine other preferred opted Some Like others liable. truth. professionals, as and the seen journalists sharing in unanimously in consists not were than knows, critics everyone rather as believe persuade—which, others to making or unavoidable oneself make ok—si h hae‘oe 5,0 oissl’ nthe their on of sales sold’’ of copies number 350,000 the ‘‘over or 92 phrase account; the into in advice their books—as the ‘‘power’’: took own producers their that of demonstration fact the by completed often were qualifications Genevie 7 8 11 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of o vnteripc ndrinkers: on impact their even —or oespotr fwn ult ifrnito undt cetfi research, scientific to turned differentiation quality wine of supporters Some accusation the parry to necessary was it wines, the quality for of market a maintain indicator To an as seen be can books critics’ wine of number the If to capacity a showing simply as interpreted be also could arguments these But ihtet er feprec ntsig Jos tasting, in experience of years twenty With smc,o oe hnteoiin ftems eondex- renowned most the of opinions the than worth more, is 1995). econometrics perts(Ginsburgh, or simple extremely much, little a reason as then every have are, we they which quality, believe of to indicators real are prices public If otwl-nw rao fcret foiini h iewrd and longest(Pe world, the wine around the been in who’s opinion journalist of specialized currents the of creator well-known most ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve tal et ,19) neooittidt orlt rcsadaset a and prices correlate to tried economist An 1994). ., 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x 7 8 Comment citer cedocument: 7 8 r 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009

ePe ´ h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The n ˜ ni urnl the currently is ın ´ r ud usr Gerber Dussert Guide 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The n ˜ n 1998). ın, ´ 7 8 12 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The aeoiso ie.Btqaiywsso aee oni utpectgre of categories multiple in down watered soon narrow to was it quality relating wines: by But definition wines. the refine of to categories tried Paumard B. like Authors wines. debate, of tautological: type becoming this of avoid point To the consumer? broadened—to the was is meaning who the then preference, consumer’s a eotdi ml enu’ book Peynaud’s proposals: Emile in reported and stable a as fitted none quality. but for factors, qualities cause pertinent distinguish reproducible were to All managing hierarchies. ever reproduce without or factors, human and meteorological a,tidt etti ikb okn o eainhpbtenteln,practices, land, the between relationship a for quality. looking of by signs link and this test to tried lar, 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of ult i o lo teft etapdi eea ento,vldfrall for valid definition, general a in trapped be to itself allow not did Quality is it If physiological? only quality Is controversies. new triggered proposals The hsrcus orsac a copne ya fott en quality, define to effort an by accompanied was research to recourse This tde yteFec ainlIsiuefrArnmcRsac,i particu- in Research, Agronomic for Institute National French the by Studies Ngtv nahg ult on a-gdwine oak-aged young quality high a on wine -Negative terroir mature very a on -Neutral wine terroir mature an on -Negative wine to terroir supposed young is a that on vine -Negative a or aromas vintage fruit latest fresh the develop of wine a on -Negative smell oxidized an wine notice the -You fermentation, after .] or . [. before oxidized. air the become with has contact Unprotected, in walnut. left vermouth, is, Madeira, that of touches expresses -‘‘Wine it make that properties its is, that 1980). ‘‘The qualities, Blouin, following: and its the desirable’’(Peynaud all is or is acceptable definition proved’’ wine obvious, A than of .]. clear, . rather [. quality very way and same experienced the simple in is it very express wine defined’’ Italians and a than Americans The rather of (Poupon); noticed is quality idea is same ‘‘The The ‘‘quality it. (Pisani); define authors: to different try to with first quality, found on written been has lot A oe trpeet o h oy’(enu n lun 1980). gratifying Blouin, the and pro- (Peynaud by body’’ or the defined fashion for is represents a a it ‘‘quality indicates power by Debry], simply influenced to that product, [According concept paganda.’’ a a for preference is consumer’s ‘‘quality Larreau], to [According suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF 7 8 13 hyrcre ag ubro eooia,agronomical, pedological, of number large a recorded They 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 egu uvin du gout Le

tldt rlfrto of proliferation a to led It . 7 8 7 8 14 Genevie ` eTeil ve 9 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

10 Genevie xetaaer,s htte ol eal oapeit ult nterown, their on quality appreciate sign: to quality any able on be rely would to they having without that so amateurs, expert credibility. its for prevented search was stabilized, the and in be again endless was culminating that could guarantees ever for guarantees from quality search required The of guarantees. credibility new definition whose could required guarantees no be reliability required never demonstrate Because could assessment to suspicious. signs attempt as the any of worse, appear credibility Even the proven. efforts, unequivocally professionals’ market Despite Signs the of theories, Rid Getting renewed and updated also methods. constantly it and multiple, view reduced; of being of points or without description differentiated coordinated the be etc. stated, theory, to required the be signs person, the multiple unanimously moment, required the could wine, Quality the wines on depended of always They qualities ranked. the nor quality wine: a d’emploi factors: contextual of elsewhere list seen longer no was quality. unanimity, of of which degree factor yield, and some a Even of wines, as them. subject of rank a to characteristics was managing France the in without and classification quality their of refined factors thus the multiplied simply they Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of e daaoe etn i ftesgsb rnfrigwn rnesinto drinkers wine transforming by signs the of rid getting arose: idea new A the Neither expand. to it caused invariably quality delimit and define to Efforts in described as consumption, of conditions the in diluted was and endless an in spread also quality consumption, and usage wine towards Turning process, production or origin their of terms in wines define to attempts for As nte iso saddt h utpefntoso eooy that oenology, wines. of of functions quality multiple the help, the to also enhance added consumers to is taste, mission choice, Another consumer’s well-advised the their refine through wines good While or original something want I 1985). Do Budget?’(Johnson, The party? extravagant? safe? evening something feel an or I lunch Do business a atmosphere? meal, family A occasion? The pressure low and taste the improves pressure 1997). effect McCarthy, an high had and pressure it(Ewing-Mulligan air taste: deteriorates the wines, the red for on least at that, concluded We 2000). Millet, and wines(Paumard such sweet oxidized, become natural to wine, tendency yellow a wine as with wine oak-aged traditional mature a very on or -Neutral mature quality high a on -Neutral ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve yHg ono,weeteato xlishwoesol choose should one how explains author the where Johnson, Hugh by 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009

7 8 h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The 7 8 r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The 7 8 evn mode vin, Le 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The inf i rhrsca ttstruhcnupin rt sr htsau by status that usurp to or consumption, to through wanted The who status consumption: one wines. the social others’ snob, of imitating her the like or quality just wine, his the the sign of signify the quality evaluate from the satisfaction from derived to not who and someone needed alone as had described they know-how was signs; labels’’ on information own of relied ‘‘drinker or who their person labels’’ of third acquire ‘‘drinkers a be to on to longer relying no without were bought They source. they wines the of quality ol n vlaetetses xets oa omk ueta ugmn about judgement a right? that was sure wine make how to a block: as of so stumbling quality expertise a the tasters’ faced the nevertheless evaluate one expertise could individual of promotion their Proof The the reinvest of to Construction capacity. The rather tasting own but their delegate the develop to to to as were longer claims they no verify choice; to free were able of Buyers be position their would wine. appreciating they of by way wine this quality local of In growing, tastes etc. wine and originality, wine, types diversity, making different of and ways traditions, about production learning by competent become to 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of nijnto a ae osmr a otyt aiaetecam fthe of claims the validate to try to had consumers made: was injunction An nietee‘sca’ rnes ‘elaaer’ a ocs sd in n try and signs aside cast to had amateurs’’ ‘‘real drinkers, ‘‘social’’ these Unlike mlo,te‘ltl’ omrs o i,aM St. a ‘‘little’’ him, the For scorn Haut-M Pommards. buds taste ‘‘little’’ the aristocratic Emilion, his the go to word off the and From crus. around grand look the quick or a same: appellations wine the prestigious the always bourguignonne, At is Saint-Vincent at friends. behaviour or their his Vinexpo among at fair, or Langon family the festival, their in one has Everybody connoisseur The appreciated better be can it that so 1980). known Blouin, better and (Peynaud wine making of ard este‘dikro aes’ht:/w.5lcm My2002]. [May labels’’(http://www.75cl.com) off considered of him that’s catch ‘‘drinker everything the never He’s least You’ll at sacred. sour’’. everything, more knows but he Y Clos balance; a ‘‘like or body’’ ofidn e eisbt...bt...‘i’ ieaCha a like ‘‘it’s . . . but . . . condescend but he’ll merits and few wine, a wine-lover’s him finding a Make to discoveries, vocation. your his of is one successful taste already are that supermarket! things What a it. Promoting in appreciate to be you he’d orders salesman He excellent descriptive sip. an his first Sometimes the glass. before his in starts has verbiage he best!’’ vintage the the wine, but knows three, He or two taste only ‘‘I’ll imperious: suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF dc hc,b ento,cudnvrrvlaPula.H is He Pauillac. a rival never could definition, by which, edoc, ´ 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 7 8

dci eet a beneath is edoc ´ ˆ euXwt less with X teau Genevie ` eTeil ve 11 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Q5 12 vlaetercmeec—n hto teswe h aewscollective. was to game order the in when tests others these of to want that themselves not competence—and subjected thus did their regularly who test evaluate those labels’’, the amateurs’’, of so ‘‘Real step ‘‘drinkers tool, avoided. be by evaluation was to an Step credibility with of evaluate. drinkers issue afforded to the and that ability competences of an to variety into ability a the covered describe, transformed to that inference and new a recognize obtain to helped identification Their nerd hswsnta uoai prto;i noprtdteparticular the incorporated tastes’’: ‘‘individual it of operation; form the automatic in taster an each the not of characteristics to was them When This link wine. inferred. describe. to the to easy of thus generally and taste or recognize was the to growers it not describe wine clear, or to the ability were able methods, performance region therefore production of their were wine differences of They vine, name of vintages. the type the wine, the of production, categories ‘‘good of of the features or gustatory amateur’’ ‘‘real discriminating the of quality’’. ethic of the ‘‘signs a to rejects of corresponded who identity that taster’’ the way recognize a was confirmation—to in performance to wine taster’s by ability—subject The simply it. an bottle, about the into information on translated other indicated any as without been wine, and a it have of tasting identity may the recognizing which in consisted of or application theory a good to or estab- reduced be or knowledge verifiable. not formalized the be could a not method, taster with could particular explicit taster know-how a a taster’s compare of to The superiority impossible lished. univocal was It A verify. taster. to reference easy as not was competence Genevie Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of aighbt eeascae ih‘tse’ rbae ntecpct oevaluate. to capacity the in biases or ‘‘tastes’’ with associated were habits Eating rmti blt orcgie naiiyt ecieadte oeaut was evaluate to then and describe to ability an recognize, to ability this From the perceive to able was drinker good the that implied recognize to ability The This test. recognition blind the was competence gustative of test simple A Tasters’ them. tasting by simply: very tested be often could wines of quality The aldfx.Truhhbt hs ie r vnulyejydb some by 1980). enjoyed Blouin, eventually and are drinkers(Peynaud wines wine these habit, Through foxy. called o;te r obytesltosfo e...I’ oehn eshould we something It’s . . a up . laugh me mixed We from get fun. solutions real they the the It’s buy lost, another. to relate are one try to they copy they they lot; end have wines, the the only At all they between again. and start take taste, wines erase, They Beychevelle. notes, the Figeac, Bordeaux, of names, often the all and pens, names and numbers and papers the numbers, them with give provide them carafe I have I convivial. a I very in buffet, and carafe. good are wine a a love They in around who blind. them friends put wines best and these my cellar discover all choose my I to in tasting. invitations blind appellations send a wine I year, a 7 once or least at 6 but around often, very it do don’t -I oewnsfrom wines Some ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve ii lambrusca Vitis 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 yrdvnshv naoata is that aroma an have vines hybrid

7 8 h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Q6 h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The ult hwdta aproshdascal influenced socially of a signs had market of presence laypersons between the that correlation that and showed the preferences—, quality with seen their based of be quality—paralleled who indicators could of as buyers revived that prices—taken signs those difference that to on taste referring a choice ways the term of their that two ‘‘laypersons’’—the instrument said and in the was experts It as interpreted between quality. interpreted was of was perception tasting diffusion real blind of limited First, virtues preclude the criticisms. Its not about sociological test. did doubts test capacity generated blind blind This recognized The the judgements. same convincing. quality the partly on but only disagreements capacity, were expert’s initiatives an new assessed these again, once But Revived basis. regular Interpretation his a Social of 2000; on The results (Chassin, Assets’’ the ‘‘Liquid published expertise website has their the Ashenfelter on on O. researchers’ tests mid-1990s doubts to the dispel agreed Since to Tasters 1999). their Morrot, reputation. designed prove to and competence attempt waiters peers of an wine of in tests to help tasting, them the ‘‘trap’’ used was without all or have expertise examinations scientists critics, and master contests, to wine their with their then with of and critics procedure tests: The signs drinkers. competence. of to set own broader confined her a to to or initially everyone extended his progressively quality encouraged verify that of to commercialization able differentiation of expert form an a become by reliability judges’ h oilcntuto fqaiy(acshn n aaina 96 n hnon then and 1996) Casabianca, imaginary and social (Valceschini or (B The quality on AOC subjective projects of measures. research this construction cross-cutting evaluate two anticompetitive social onwards the to 1994 hidden the From try quality. be fuelled of to content to social wines, asked especially and consequently said of currents were were quality economic sciences liberal Signs the by WTO. and signs of sign the relevance the the today. of world between wine denunciation link the the in foreseeable debate is ‘‘good totally recent to It most wines’’ the most. ‘‘good in linking the found norm’’ be distinction ‘‘social can to a social that capacity of drinkers’’ influenced their idea and the who interpretation, techniques taste second tasting legitimate blind a ostentatious produce their with experts the al et cnmcrns(Lacroix rents economic vrmngn ocnanit. Sylvander contain 1996; to (INRA, managing subject ever scientific the Research: on Agronomic held for were Institute conferences National French the around theme this 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of osmr eentteol nst aercus oteebidrecognition blind these to recourse have to ones only the not were Consumers the proving of impossibility the to responded thus drinkers and Professionals ult prcaina h euto ettv rcs n h ako fixed, a of lack the and process tentative a of result the as appreciation Quality ,19) oilgclraoigldt nams otatn ocuin twas it conclusion: contrasting almost an to led reasoning Sociological 1997). ., omr fe eas talw st hr h ieculture(Interview wine the 13). share p. to JMA, us drinker allows wine it with because often more do suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: rne n acshn,19)tidt eeaesca cec eerhon research science social federate to tried 1999) Valceschini, and eranger

´ UNCORRECTED PROOF 7 8 tal et 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 7 8 15 ,20;Mollard 2000; ., 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 Oscudb nepee seooi aresor barriers economic as interpreted be could AOCs 7 8

tal et ,20)wihsgiya income an signify which 2001) ., 7 8 7 8 osmto (Combris consumption tal et ,20) without 2000), ., 7 8 7 8 Genevie ` eTeil ve 13 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

14 Gnbrh 95 drc n ord,20)aie iecudas ese as identity seen social be a sustaining also market could (Barth a Wine process qualified alike. which 2001; 2004) economics’’ ‘‘identity (Garcia-Parpet, Corrado, framing and consumer Odorici the 1995; the from (Ginsburgh, for than wine of rather for components, creation processes taste Ginsburgh wines’ actual distinction the an of and where of view interactions characteristics result congruent social the a from not developed resulted is work that Sociological advantage wealth. definite a from derived Genevie oqeigmre hrsa h xes fteFec production: French surely the but of slowly expense were the and at outset shares the market from conquering market the towards approach unbiased market: the problems, of The of functioning source drinkers. good a the the therefore the to a and of towards distortions of expectations, imposition social turn rid the demand’s including to the get to related to to were and foreign producers heard quality quality, French be the of by could encountered definition call problems their loud and increasingly an experts onwards, 2000 From Experts the of Rid Getting lot a spent were nevertheless there wines. He him on calculation. for from money nor So of differentiation, circumstances. arose dissimilarities no drinking the few and different Differences on differences The in concentrate only have twice. to ranking. might him wine wine for or same opportunities same the were a classification so differ- buy did a exceptionally he a that for only times of would allowed him he have for form and would So consumption was the that quality. There wines exercise. wine’s in taste the the marvellous entiation around a analyse but frame to differences, differentiating wine ability of no his set a also enjoyed not but He was prices. quality wine, wine to drank the attention He paying only without him. randomly, help not wines could his information chose no of—had and that think daily ‘‘added’’ so could any he taste, of else idiosyncratic free one totally interactions every a he—like market that with of said fit result the He could the all one procedure. as only qualification Among quality years, economy. 15 of the last definition the of a over of such distortion interviewed functioning I a the drinkers to and into related buyers quality wine be insert always to could undertaken market efforts the the all And procedure. Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of ncnrs,wnre rmtenwwn rdcn onre a dpe an adopted had countries producing wine new the from wineries contrast, In non-economic additional an from but market the from not arose Quality eeomn n aktn aewre adi ad ... tsno It’s .] . [. hand. in hand research, Australia, worked in have wine marketing of history and modern development of beginning the -From the of future the 2010’’( on Cap tank report think the a a into of out of thrown initiator be and ‘‘author or industry Holies Berthomeau of Holy J. the comply into to darkness’’ have enter They to wine. rules by the enslaved with are consumers our stage this ‘‘At ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve tal et el ´ ,19) h rdcr(ejmnadPdly 99 rtecritic the or 1999) Podolny, and (Benjamin producer the 1994), ., m n idu 04 adiadAtmrh,1997). Antomarchi, and Taddei 2004; Nieddu, and emy ´ 7 8 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009

7 8 h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The R usrVigne eussir ´ r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The 7 8 7 8 2004). , 7 8 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The taeis(anr 07.Bta h aetm hyhv lonvrsopdraising stopped never also economic have they their time for same the keystone US at a Today But as more. 2007). other (Warner, many branding’’ to strategies and adapted ‘‘geographic oil been consider olive and cheese, producers as Italy, wine such or products some Spain agricultural to as and exported such food been countries has concept producing the wine and other producers attracted always have AOCs production wine the Conclusion denounced and surprising techniques. or marketing experiences, new of use demanded taste the necessity of their this effect wine to standardization renew All bow experts. to to the by tastes, want acknowledged wines known not that their did on know on or who to choices quality drinkers their drinkers wine’s base the wine to on But required and than experience. rather preferred and drinkers’ they existed the quality already with wine which converge organization would market bottle a the that such so by tastes borne consumers’ with claims better the wines matching suggested expert market above make to ‘‘information’’ required them of choice. many contrary, better showed, the wine AOCs a On all the intentions. not of sellers’ However, success or the customers. producers’ as their the cheat doubt to radically would quick buyers as seen were who producers buy: to ‘‘pure people consumers, induce of to solely manipulation they of intended claims, strategies’’ instruments quality as marketing producers’ claims the these and interpret opinion usually their between discrepancies of case expectations. consumers’ that the differentiation to quality related any only directly against assessments, world not widely not quality was more new was objection their but This the AOCs, and the techniques. experts withstand against marketing of directed up-to-date to rid towards wanted turn get to wines to and have French would If they 2002). competition, Spiritueux, et Vins Franc (Association or (2002) 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of iia u esdtie esnn a efudi ntttd’ Institut in found be can reasoning detailed less but similar A nodrt vi hsne o nomto n l h rbesi novd the involved, it problems the all and information for need this avoid to order In and sellers among duplicity induced profit a make to and sell to need The In wines. their choosing in experiences taste their upon rely drinkers wine Many 7 8 iesol emcooyeae rnt aue nasdmn or sediment a on matured not, or whether ( micro-oxygenated say not to be consumer the should to wine up it’s a decide, to oenologists to up longer [ ]abtl ieta,ta’ itnuse yislbladisshape, p. RL, its drinker and wine label with its it(Interview by at 40). look distinguished even that’s a don’t that, with I like automatically bottles bottle him a shape): show .] ‘‘Bordeaux’’ . (I so-called -[. bottle? a others, of the type to this different of shape think you do -What suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF R usrVigne eussir ´ 7 8 7 8 2004). , 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r ¸ iedsEeer motiluse itiuer de Distributeurs et Embouteilleurs Eleveurs des aise 7 8 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009

tdsGaultier etudes ´ Genevie ` eTeil ve 15 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

16 h iitrrttoso h ult in,ciisadmre nemdaisasked intermediaries market and prevent critics definitively signs, to quality impossible seemed the constructed it of socially As misinterpretations wine. as the with interpreted link help was any this advice without But their thus their credibility. and doubts: provided in signs’ the They and foster drinkers differentiation. quality to about quality wine continued information wine help more the ever the to sustain with about to them tried inquiry order indirect professionals in an inquiry wine using quality choices, Many their consumers credibility. make And to signs’ 2001). quality (Teil, wine upon a of evaluation—albeit relied quality an still general for a allow to one—of claim controversial could highly critics of community the However, con- objections from view. the market of wine quality, proved point the of on defenders’ also keystone quality a influence sciences the quality, human of social identification and the the threatening product tinued, uni- As delimit a hierarchy. to support and be unable could course could differentiation characteristics of quality product about stabilized was view vocal Quality general true 341). no overall p. Consequently, enough 2006, precise created. restriction, (Josling, no the origin but justified’’ enforcing of tested, putatively of the region empirically is and If the information GI weighed. denoting that the label benefits providing then of exclusive Each and cost the empirical. costs the essentially from and outweighs is get individually not consumers Josling or explored that T. merited debate, be benefit is GI could to GI the and a has clear concept to whether situation trying ungraspable of While issue of all. ‘‘The sort for recalls and a once to be delimited contrarily to be perceived, never and appeared their concrete quality and although on belief, But, themselves calling common help. by signs for critique sociological sciences the the technical improve answered the then to They differentiate. first to the tried capacity whatever professionals that market so improved. aims, be convince, to to is had critics therefore constantly consumers wine qualification and about reluctant wine fact the qualities, interesting found reason, An between always AOCs. the differentiate they of use to that wider the a ability help achieve to to its tried they economic helped contrary, maintain the fair On to arguments. to these market ignore not hindrances did supporters AOCs, all were the buyers—, of retailers, they actors—producers, market wine believed The competition. social economists differentiating at while aimed illusions behaviours, as them perceived Sociologists information. epu ult niain,alteeopnnsssetdaddnucdtheir denounced difference and a suspected opponents generate these to all ability indications, quality helpful to inability many their with qualities. denounced AOCs wine have between the They differentiate opposed and ‘‘really’’ experiments. governments, have and market, vineyards experiences perfect non-AOC arguments, a from for of producers looking theories many marketers sociological and with economists equipped taste, sociologists drinkers, Doubtful suspicions. Genevie Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of cec ol o rvd ent nwraottegonso quality. of grounds the about answer definite a provide not could Science hidden other for pretext a simply was quality that accusations these with Faced sAC eewdl sdb iedikr h a hma eibeand reliable as them saw who drinkers wine by used widely were AOCs As ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 e se per ssgsrte hnbaeso true of bearers than rather signs as ,

7 8 h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 7 8 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The en o oeta thsls t iciiaoypwr hra tessei sa has as AOC it an see others to whereas belong power, to discriminatory its claim lost could has it wines that many some so for meant that in fact shown as The 2002, questioned. in a mark than 350 expensive the more topped times AOCs 6.5 wine 1. average of Figure on (Bartoli number was The another wine wine. AOC to table an AOC 2006, one in from and 1987); differences considerable with although annum. per D mhl Vin 0.25 or by label increased since AOC has annum an per with mhl 0.5 an wines one of of the Sup production, only on production wine While the in constantly see wines. decline 1970s, has table steep the wines today a quality’’ qualified been ‘‘low has people AOC the there of of hand expense few number the The at at choices, shelves, estates. partly cellars’ wine increased, their wine on or or make supermarket fairs on wine to ‘‘wine’’ buyers called AOCs wine product all undifferentiated the not Although upon market. wine the rely changed have has qualification who AOC The actors Organization of Market critique. New collective wine A large aim: this a to percep- activity of made their efforts analysed, of most out, the dedicated worked through be to appreciated had of tible, Quality hundreds opinions. with and market perceptions a year. sustains every that brands wine marketed sense, calculation newly a see (2003) or of people differentiation, Muniesa’s thousands a many and framed are that have differences Callon they fact those sense, in though the this even In to differences, defined. organized related easily of not be world a can to action pertaining as their that sense the disputed and ephemeral increasingly quality, of set and wine growing of a journalists statements. instability of radical result retailers, the a lovers, become by has followed wine which was sommeliers, debate The later specialists. œnolo- and market brokers, of producers, organizations, enrolment professional and of increasing gists professionals members wine an administrators, These debate. in first existing definition were quality resulted on the in historically has carry drinkers less still and qualification or professionals procedures more twirling qualification and This complex the a together. all Troy, where of market city the multilayered like appears expertise now drinkers’ market wine the differentiation. evaluate social of to stop signs adopted to as tests unable seen appeared the were initiative as able new accusation become this to social But expertise the themselves. necessary the by acquire quality to recognize and to them use to not drinkers wine 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 7 8 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of rer ae VQ)spro ult iefo eiie rdcinarea— production delimited from wine quality (VDQS)—superior label erieure h infiac fteehg rcsadicesn ubr fAC a been has AOCs of numbers increasing and prices high these of significance The 1960s the of end the since steady been has wines table between gap price The all on alone itself imposes that quality a upon rely not does performance This in differentiation wine a performed have intermediaries market these Finally, wine the result, a As procedures. existent the improved also critics Moreover, ´ suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: 7 8 UNCORRECTED PROOF 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 7 8

elimit ´ eQualit de e ´ Genevie ` tal et eTeil ve 17 ., e ´ 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

aigtemre xrml eeie l vrtewrd uigawn salbta but all is wine 18 a buying world, poverty. the to over contributed intellectual All and reflexive. and wine extremely of standardization market quality the to the making towards leading attention of drawn accused have market—although Controversies the often critics. by is the fuelled latter of organization the activity ‘‘cultured’’ and full-blown work a the become has upon rely in basically But they interested not. so or the once well-informed do only are to themselves, they buy order whether consumers or in knowing in wines, the active their Finally, extremely risk- for are a know. quality, pay adopted already they have price they Others the a wines bottled. restricting as signal by estate such also strategy signs or limiting quality could recognition, multiple critics’ it with AOC, wines as medals, select Or, they strategy, reliability. marketing recognized successful unquestionably credibility. of signs’ procedures the indicator their of evaluation adjusted link consumers, an or the including directly, created that by have proved wines seems intermediaries, and choosing it market for established since of they be help And but cannot the signs, nothing. with quality the than of and better criticism expense. sign are to wines’ between signs ear table the deaf the at a that them, shares turned consider of market necessarily famous not conquered most have slowly the Drinkers and have signs wines quality AOC use AOC. to continued have consumers interests, aims, their on controversies. generating depending changes, organization And this to organization. efforts theories, actors’ and market the from visions arise best also can the It concept. achieve the of the inadequacy inherent since an to standards quality production the AOC. of the improvement of creation general the of result Genevie Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of hnst h ult ifrnito ntae yGs h osmto fwine of consumption the GIs, by initiated differentiation quality the to Thanks an as fame upon rely can buyers wine credibility, signs’ the assess to order In that show statistics the soap, as slippery as appear sold. may and produced quality is wine Although controversies, the whatever But related often is It AOCs? to consubstantial so be to seem controversy does Why ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: UNCORRECTED PROOF Teil ve 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 50 iue1: Figure 9014 9016 9018 902000 1990 1980 1970 1960 1950 1940 1930 0 The growingnumberofFrenchAOCsandVDC uuae ubro Osfo 95t 2004. to 1935 from AOCs of number Cumulated 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r Notes on focussed construction the e-mail: the is which to frames; contribute in market work and way particular tastes Her the of shape and uses, France. evaluation qualities, this Paris, product that of techniques 75005 evaluation Bernard, the assessment, Claude product rue 16 mique, supporters. market se quality suspicion per the arouse by to dangerous and ability unfair their as but perceived are consumers, they deceive when to the capacity experience, intrinsic on. their former so her and or reliability, his their prices, drinkers, place, the other shopping of qualities, the opinions the information, contemplates available customer the The procedure. straightforward AOCs Wine French The Genevie Author difficult. the bit About a production quality to And benefit. commitment future their a always make and producers for always AOC constraints expressing may that production so this to quality reliable, present as committed implement seen they to is be incentives, quality have efficient once all very only are achieved also instance. prices be for higher will must though it, Even producers of and quality. charge that origin AOC in enhancing its that administration from the resulting follows of difference efficiency It a political demonstrate the can from it not that so grounded, achieve be not do AOCs under products and praised, prices. organization market be higher such cannot no to quality defenders, able have emerge, not not are may do and AOCs they value When when importance. highest specific suspicions, major a the the of resist induce achieve is therefore quality may of and quality assessment wine, where the may of where market, case necessity quality the This in a quality. on as format, of critique, market depends a notion still capacity of the rise their and define the demonstrate to generate depended and thus ensure, has quality—and establish, efficiency designate to to Their proponents their users. of their ability the of view of point 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 .AC r fe adt erlal in eas hyaesaecnrle rguaranteed. or controlled state are of they Law because signs products; reliable agricultural be to or said food often are selling AOCs in 3. fraud against 1905 August of places 1 and of conditions Law the regulated 2. II Felipe by decree a century sixteenth the From 1. Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of uta n ult in rnhAC r ete rdbenrurlal signs unreliable nor credible neither are AOCs French not sign, is quality AOCs any as wine Just the of strength and virtue a that conclude can we Finally, nodrt eitteatcs ti fums motnefrACqaiyto quality AOC for importance utmost of is it attacks, the resist to order In lodfeetfo h sa xet’sgssc stewn eetoso ieguides. wine of selections wine the as such signs are experts’ signs these usual defined, the administratively from the are joined different they experts also professional as once But, recognized committees. became definition sign quality The true. not surely is 1905. This August 1 of Law the amending 1908, August 5 (Spain). area Valladolid the in wines quality of production they ; suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: ` UNCORRECTED Teil ve PROOF a ob aecredible made be to had AATUR14,Isiu ainld aRceceAgrono- Recherche la de National Institut 1048, UMR SADAPT , 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 hti ‘eibeeog ob sfl’fo the from useful’’ be to enough ‘‘reliable is that , [email protected]

Genevie ` eTeil ve 19 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Q8 Q7 soito Franc Association ejmn .A n oon,J .(99 Sau,Qaiy n oilOdri the in Order Social and Quality, B ‘Status, (1999) M. J. (eds) Podolny, E. and Montaigne, A. and B. R. Benjamin, Lifran, J.-P., Laporte, P., Lacombe, D., Boulet, P., Bartoli, Barth 20 Market the and Uncertainty Quality ‘‘Lemons’’: for Market ‘The (1970) A. G. Akerlof, References aln .adMnea .(03 Lsmarch ‘Les (2003) F. Muniesa, and M. Callon, Genevie 5 hsrsac etbyn h aeo ieadfcsdmr eeal ntequality the on generally more focused and wine of in case Blouin the and beyond Peynaud went by research quoted This citations the 15. of authors For the Institute are Debry National and French Larreau the 14. to belonging laboratories six 1990s early the nothing. In 1990 of editions. 13. that subsequent and in 450,000’’ Unchanged ‘‘over promoting mentions 12. to edition 1994 dedicated The and 11. 1955 in founded Wine, of Masters of Institute The 10. rne,C n acshn,E (1999) E. Valceschini, and C. eranger, ´ .Tewr ‘rtqe’rfr otecletv omdb l niiul‘‘critics’’. individual all by 2 formed are collective francs the 15 to barrels. refers 7. in ‘‘critique’’ maturation word of interviewer. The period the short 6. by a question with a Wines indicates italics 5. of use The 4. .Ti ouetcnan h 5asest usinar nRbr akrproposed Parker Robert on questionnaire a to answers 45 the contains document This 9. 1990s. the before produced was wine table poor where France in least at true was This 8. Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of (2002) aionaWn Industry’, Wine California (1987) identitaires’, bien — marchands multifonctionnalit biens l’opposition sur ou jointes Mechanism R sign. citation. this in reproduced and book their the and quality of signs wines. between of link the quality on working were (INRA) Research Agronomic taster. wine a as reliability as acknowledged such their professionals claim wine thus and could nationalities who other and journalists to retailers 1988 English in among opened wine merchants, of appreciation and understanding knowledge, oetPre?’ hr vr iedikri ecie savci ftepsto of position the of of victim think Parker. a you by as do exploited described ‘‘What and is question occupied drinker the strength wine to every answer where harshest Parker?’’, the Robert cited We website. a on a as reliability and already fame They their prices. maintain high well- label. to very few quality critique or a international high zones the at quality the from wines the Spain, benefited table from In as excluded wines. sold has French brands GIs best established wine the the with of 1982 compared vintage creation and fifth recent critics The exception. thee only by the welcomed be might was Gassac Daumas Mas wine table The el ´ ` eseaux ´ suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: eTeil ve m,D n idu .(04 L multifonctionnalit ‘La (2004) M. Nieddu, and D. emy, UNCORRECTED´ PROOF atn osa nous Battons L’ 112,189–233. 21(122), , cnmevtcl franc viticole economie ´ 7 8 ’, ¸ urel ora fEconomics of Journal Quarterly iedsEeer motiluse itiuer eVn tSpiritueux et Vins de Distributeurs et Embouteilleurs Eleveurs des aise h 5 h okwspbihdi 1996. in published was book The 25. e ´ 044,82–97. 2004(4), , ` armes 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: diitaieSineQuarterly Science Administrative egales! ´ aise ¸ r 7 8 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 NA Paris. INRA, . nomto rseOPHA. Presse Information . Qualit

e rdisli produits des e ´ es ´ cnmqe om ipstf ecalcul’, de dispositifs comme economiques 4 488–500. 84, , ´ h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The :u d un e: sa es ´ ´ 43,563–89. 44(3), , ` erorigine leur r btsrlsproductions les sur ebat ´ 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The e air ela de Cahiers Les NA Paris. INRA, . 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Q11 Q10 Q9 olr,A,Pcuu,B n ola .(01 Ofed rdise evcsterritorialis services et produits de ‘Offre (2001) M. Moalla, and B. Pecqueur, A., Mollard, (1999) D. Markham, ort .(99 Pu-nam ‘Peut-on (1999) G. Morrot, ari,A . olr,A n eqer .(00 Oiiee rdisd qualit de produits et ‘Origine (2000) B. Pecqueur, and A. Trade Mollard, Transatlantic J., a A. as Lacroix, Indications Geographical Terroir: on War ‘The (2006) T. Josling, (1985) H. Johnson, (1996) W. James, (1968) W. James, uad .(98 eGadBOB Grand Le (1998) J. Durand, hsi,M 20)‘ejr xet n r une expert: jury ‘Le (2000) M. Chassin, ocii . eaae .adPc,D 20)‘egahclIdctosadthe and Indications ‘Geographical (2008) D. Pick, and L. Menapace, G., Moschini, ntttd’ Institut conference first the of Proceedings viticoles’’.’ terroirs ‘‘Les colloque du ‘Actes (1996) INRA Dispute’, Indications Geographical WTO ‘The (2006) Wine M. is Handler, What Medoc, of Wines ‘Red (1994) A. Monzak, and M. Monzak, V., Ginsburgh, ntttNtoa e peltosdOiie(1985) d’Origine Appellations des National Institut hrir .adNo .A 20)‘naayi fteErpa omnte:Poeto of Protection Communities: European the of analysis ‘An (2007) M.-A. Ngo, and C. Charlier, acaPre,M-.(01 Sye evee manie et vie de ‘Styles (2001) M.-F. Garcia-Parpet, isug,V 19)‘ehiusd rdcin r production, de ‘Techniques (1995) V. Ginsburgh, (1995) G. Garrier, (1967) H. Garfinkel, (1997) E. McCarthy, and M. Ewing-Mulligan, h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The r AOCs Wine French The 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of n 4h Paris. 14th, and Journ lancast approche et a signal du territoriale: Conflict’, York. New Co, and Greens uain u n marqu ont qui mutations ’rgn contro d’origine eaie a relatives opttv rvso fQaiyi giutrlMarkets’, Economics Agricultural Agricultural in Quality of Provision Competitive e erisvtclshl tAgr nJl 96 h 7had1t.IR Angers- INRA 18th. and 17th the 1996, July on Angers Montpellier. at held viticoles terroirs Les 70–80. 69(1), 1994. Vineyard May the Italy, by Verona, organized at Conference held the Society, at Quantitative the Data at presented Paper Worth,’ Tasting rdmrsadGorpia niain o giutrlPout n Foodstuffs and Products Agricultural Dispute’, for Indications Geographical and Trademarks nentoa el in td Vin du et Vigne la de International ’raiainscaed l’ de sociale L’organisation econom (eds), otlsprpcie orlspohie ann prochaines les pour perspectives les sont epecito nlgqe’Pprpeetda h t journ 8th the at presented Paper œnologique,’ prescription de ´ suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI:

UNCORRECTED (2002) Gaultier. etudes PROOF e el Proximit la de ees ´ e rsd vin du arts Les ´ tiussrlsvn ogsd atM Haut du rouges vins les sur etriques ´ ` h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The ora fArclua Economics Agricultural of Journal ’nls gustative’, l’analyse sasi aia Empiricism Radical in Essays Pragmatisme Le itieScaee utrled vin du culturelle et Sociale Histoire ˆ evnmd d’emploi mode vin Le l evn teaux-de-vie et vins ee tde nEthnomethodology in Studies ´ 85 itiedu Classement d’un Histoire 1855, ren el ead ebe obns’Pprpeetda h III the at presented Paper combines,’ bien de demande la de erienne ´ .LeCr ` 03,794–812. 90(3), , l’attribut?’, :‘nuelscosacse ertie’,Dcme 01te13th the 2001 December territoires’’, et croissances ‘‘nouvelles e: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x avgee e isd rnecsdu dernie deux ces France de vins les et vigne la e ´ ´ Comment citer cedocument: loe e efracsd d du performances les eliorer r cnme e8ji 01 ilnued’Ascq. Villeneuve 2001, juin 8 Le economie, ´ 7 8 ´ dtCmua,Buels p 227–41. pp. Bruxelles, Communal, edit ´ 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 Enque . .Famro,Paris. Flammarion, E. . eu Franc Revue ˆ eu d’ Revue seilise‘L d ‘‘La issue (special eVNTC 02 ule otlsgrandes les sont Quelles 2002: VINITECH te pneaxitroain e rfsinesd vin du professionnels des interrogations aux eponse lmain Paris. Flammarion, . ´ uoipesos Paris. Euro-impressions, .

nvriyo ersaPes&Longmans & Press Nebraska of University . evnpu e nuls les pour vin Le ied’œnologie aise ¸ cnmerrl turbaine et rurale economie ees ´ 73,337–63. 57(3), , ´ 7 8 ` rnieHl,EgeodCif,NJ. Cliffs, Englewood Hall, Prentice . e ebie nmarch un boire: de res ? ptto tqualit et eputation ´ dc,i .Bue n .Vandeuven H. and Beusen P. in edoc’, n r Une ´ dtosF Editions . VINITECH. ods Paris. Bordas, . 034,171–86. 10(3–4), , ust franc eussite ´ gsain’,31–8. egustation’’), ´ egustateur ´ miji) 20–2. (mai/juin), rt Paris. eret, mrcnJunlof Journal American ´ YE,Paris. SYBEX, . ed’ ee ´ oenLwReview Law Modern 7 8 ie l’appellation aise: ¸ e vins—Essais des e ´ ?’, td uCLERSE, du etude ` ´ e d res elofedsbiens des l’offre de e ´ 004,683–706. 2000(4), , Journal ec ´ ne?Quelles enies? ´ Genevie e ´ ` eTeil ve , 21 es ´ 1 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 WP353 JWIP (BWUK JWIP 353.PDF 10-Feb-09 23:25 221847 Bytes 22 PAGES n operator=T.Prasath) Version preprint 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Q12 enu,E Peynaud, Pe Renvois Renvois amr,B n ilt .G (2000) J.-G. Millet, and B. Paumard, R Social Intermediaries, Demand: and Supply ‘Between (2004) R. Corrado, and V. Odorici, el .(01 L rdcind ueetesth jugement du production ‘La (2001) G. (1997) Teil, F. Antomarchi, and D. Taddei, socio- ‘Aspects (2000) F. Arfini, and D. Barjolle, B., Sylvander, el .(2004) G. Teil, 22 anr .D 20)‘h ult fssanblt:areooia atesisadthe and partnerships agroecological sustainability: of quality ‘The (2007) D. K. Warner, (1996) N. Casabianca, and E. Valceschini, sans vins ‘Des (2007) A. Hennion, and P. Floux, S., Blanchemanche, S., Barrey, G., Teil, Genevie usrVigne eussir ´ n ˜ Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of n .(1998) J. ın, ´ Paris. 98 1999] 1998, ewrsadteCntuto fQaiyi h tla ieIndustry’, Wine Italian the Governance in and Quality Management of Construction the and Networks as 83 coe 99 NAcl.Atse omnctosN communications et Le Actes at coll. held INRA Economists 1999, Agricultural October of 28–30 Association Mans, European the of conference 67th filie les Vigne isd eri+nee. apr uVlt3d rgam ise etcdsau Pesticides et Vins programme du 3 Volet Ministe du Rapport Terroir+annexes.’ pr de de vins principe double un bio, le Travail du Sociologie de Revue egahcbadn fClfri grapes’, California of branding geographic Qualit la de Sociale Construction l’AIP l’INRA de final recherches—Rapport de Champ a prescription la de analyse Une pesticides? qualit ` suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: eTeil ve ,G (1996) G. e, ,G (2004) G. e, ´ ´ e

UNCORRECTED PROOF 18–32. 97(mai), , ´ ´ ` Octare . e goaietie ertie,codnto tisiuin, rceig fthe of Proceedings institutions,’ et coordination territoires, : agro-alimentaires res n lun .(1980) J. Blouin, and . ` NA Paris. INRA, . ed ’clgee uD du et l’Ecologie de re 20)‘uvgol uca,Dossier chai, au vignoble ‘Du (2004) el op u le aux coupe la De Gu iEr dcoe,Madrid. ediciones, Pi&Erre . ` aPe ıa ´ ,Toulouse. s, emned i:Ato bluff ou Art vin: du monde Le emned i --lprul raison? la perdu a-t-il vin du monde Le n ˜ nd o io eEspa de vinos los de ın ´ 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument: ` rs-paiusd apreto tms nmarch en mise et perception la de pratiques - vres () 149–71. 8(2), , egou Le 31,67–89. 43(1), , r vlpeetDrbe Paris. Durable, eveloppement cuin oe3 ’giutr raisonn L’agriculture 3: Tome ecaution; ´ ´ ud rtqed ad la de pratique Guide 09TeAto.JunlCompilation Journal Author. The 2009 cnmeidentitaire Economie ¨ uvn egadlved ad la de livre grand le vin, du t aqualit La

` a19 18–8 93 94 959,1997, 1995–96, 1994, 1993, [1987–88, 1999 na ˜ acnomto.Tm :synthe 1: Tome consommation. la ora fRrlStudies Rural of Journal tqesrlsvn a aciiu vinicole’, critique la par vins les sur etique ´ dtosd oege Rodez. Rouergue, du Editions . aslAr-lmnar,Eegned’un Emergence l’Agro-alimentaire, dans e ´ ß ar uvnpu evendre le pour vin du faire gsaind vin du egustation ´ dtosd oege Rodez. Rouergue, du Editions lin,Ajaccio. Albiana, . h ora fWrdItleta Property Intellectual World of Journal The cnmqe eloiiedans l’origine de economiques ´ r 09BakelPbihn Ltd Publishing Blackwell 2009 h rnhWn AOCs Wine French The egustation ´ 32,142–55. 23(2), , 1 712 Paris. 17/1-2: yols Paris. Eyrolles, . e oe4 les 4: Tome ee: ´ ora of Journal 7 8 ` Bordas, . e oe2: Tome se; evn de vins de e ´ ’, ede ´ R eussir ´ Version preprint proof byfaxdonotwritetooclosetothepaper'sedge.Pleaserememberthatillegiblemark changes/additions. Pleasewriteyouranswersclearlyonthequerysheetifthereisinsufficientspacepageproofs.Ifreturning During thecopy Dear Author, ______Author QueryForm Teil, G. (2009). Thefrench wine"appellations d'origine contrôlée"and thevirtues of Article Journal Query No. suspicion. TheJournal ofWorldIntellectual Property, 13(2),253-274. DOI: Q12 Q11 Q10 Q9 Q8 Q7 Q6 Q5 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1

353 JWIP details. please confirm. et DistributeursdeVinsSpiritueux(2002). text. AUTHOR: PleaseprovidevolumeforthereferenceMorrot(1999). AUTHOR: PleaseprovideplaceofpublicationforthereferenceInstitutd'(tudesGaultier (2002). AUTHOR: PleaseprovidefurtherdetailsforthereferenceDurand(1998). AUTHOR: PleaseprovideplaceofpublicationforthereferenceAssociationFran(aisedesEleveursEmbouteilleurs AUTHOR: Pleaseprovideissue(ifthejournaluses)forreferenceAkerlof(1970) AUTHOR: Combrisetal.(1997)hasnotbeenincludedintheReferenceList,pleasesupplyfullpublicationdetails. AUTHOR: Pleaseconfirmthechangeof'VitisLambrusca'tolambrusca'inextract"Somewinesfrom..." AUTHOR: Pleasechecktheuseof"2(25"innote7. AUTHOR: AddorandGrazioli(2002)hasnotbeenincludedintheReferenceList,pleasesupplyfullpublication Wiley AUTHOR: Asperthejournalstyleonly4keywordsareallowed,hencepleaseretainanddeleterest. - AUTHOR: Pleaseprovideissue(ifthejournalusesit)inreferenceR(ussirVigne(2004). editing ofyourpaper,thefollowingqueriesarose.Pleaserespondtothesebymarkingupproofswithnecessary - Blackwell: Asperthejournalstyleintroductionheadingshouldbedeleted,buthaveretainedinthiscase, 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00353.x Comment citer cedocument:

Description

- ups maydelaypublication.

Author Response