DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments 1 European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 2020/2223(INI) 8.1.2021 AMENDMENTS 1 - 73 Draft opinion Andrus Ansip (PE660.385v01-00) Competition policy – annual report 2020 (2020/2223(INI)) AM\1220902EN.docx PE662.163v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE662.163v01-00 2/40 AM\1220902EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Anna Cavazzini on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Recalls that competition policy is 1. Recalls that competition policy is vital to strengthening and ultimately vital to the proper functioning and completing the single market by providing strengthening of the single market by a fair and level playing field for all market providing a fair and level playing field for participants, enabling the growth of all market participants, both in non-digital innovative businesses, and guaranteeing a and digital markets, enabling the growth high level of consumer protection and of innovative businesses, and guaranteeing choice; a high level of consumer protection and choice by leading to higher product choice, not only in terms of lowest price but also in terms of quality features; Considers furthermore that SMES would benefit from rigorous application of competition rules, both in offline and digital spheres; Or. en Amendment 2 Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt, Sylvie Guillaume, Adriana Maldonado López, Maria- Manuel Leitão-Marques, Andreas Schieder, Biljana Borzan Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Recalls that competition policy is 1. Recalls that competition policy is vital to strengthening and ultimately vital to strengthening and ultimately completing the single market by providing completing the single market by a fair and level playing field for all market preventing the distortion of competition, participants, enabling the growth of providing a fair and level playing field for innovative businesses, and guaranteeing a all market participants - including the high level of consumer protection and micro-, small- and medium-sized choice; enterprises (SMEs) -, enabling the growth of innovative businesses, guaranteeing a high level of consumer protection and allowing consumers to choose between a AM\1220902EN.docx 3/40 PE662.163v01-00 EN variety of suppliers and products; Or. en Amendment 3 Eugen Jurzyca, Dominik Tarczyński Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Recalls that competition policy is 1. Recalls that competition policy is vital to strengthening and ultimately vital to strengthening and ultimately completing the single market by providing completing the single market by providing a fair and level playing field for all market a fair and level playing field for all market participants, enabling the growth of participants, enabling the growth of innovative businesses, and guaranteeing a innovative businesses, ensuring high level of consumer protection and competitiveness of EU companies at choice; global level and guaranteeing a high level of consumer protection and choice; Stresses that consumer welfare must remain the ultimate goal of the competition policy; Or. en Amendment 4 Maria Grapini Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Recalls that competition policy is 1. Recalls that competition policy is vital to strengthening and ultimately vital to strengthening and ultimately completing the single market by providing completing the single market by providing a fair and level playing field for all market a fair and level playing field for all market participants, enabling the growth of participants, enabling the growth of innovative businesses, and guaranteeing a innovative businesses, and guaranteeing a high level of consumer protection and high level of consumer protection and choice; more varied choice; Or. ro PE662.163v01-00 4/40 AM\1220902EN.docx EN Amendment 5 Jean-Lin Lacapelle, Virginie Joron, Marco Campomenosi, Markus Buchheit Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1a. Stresses that competition policy applies only to actors operating on European territory, but that the globalised nature of the economy and trade enables key players to implement global strategies that are not subject to EU legislation and are designed to circumvent it, generating significant economic and social harm in Europe while appearing to meet the objectives of European competition; strongly recommends that these objectives, in particular those of low prices and the strong competition supposedly conducive to creativity, be revised in the light of the costs and destruction that their implementation entails, with the focus shifting to fair prices and equitable development; Or. fr Amendment 6 Anna Cavazzini on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1a. Stresses that competition rules, consumer welfare and sustainability issues are closely interlinked; highlights therefore the need to address sustainability in shaping EU competition policy tools, especially in its ex-ante regulatory mechanism as well as State Aid AM\1220902EN.docx 5/40 PE662.163v01-00 EN guidelines, to be a supporting tool to the objectives of the Green New Deal, Sustainable Development Goals and Climate Paris Agreement, and address market distortions by taking into consideration all aspects of unfair competition, including social and environmental negative externalities; Or. en Amendment 7 Tomislav Sokol, Edina Tóth, Romana Tomc, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Arba Kokalari, Deirdre Clune, Maria da Graça Carvalho Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1a. Emphasizes in particular that competition and consumer policies complement each other as they both aim to protect consumers and to ensure the normal functioning of the single market; recalls that the New Consumer Agenda presented by the European Commission as one of its objectives envisages the continuation of the fight against consumer scams, unfair marketing practices and fraud; Or. en Amendment 8 Marco Campomenosi, Alessandra Basso, Antonio Maria Rinaldi, Isabella Tovaglieri, Markus Buchheit, Virginie Joron, Jean-Lin Lacapelle Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1a. Recalls the importance of safeguarding consumers' right to a PE662.163v01-00 6/40 AM\1220902EN.docx EN conscious and safe choice by promoting tools that will ensure the highest level of transparency about the composition and origin of products; Or. en Amendment 9 Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt, Sylvie Guillaume, Adriana Maldonado López, Maria- Manuel Leitão-Marques, Andreas Schieder, Maria Grapini, Biljana Borzan Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1a. Underlines the high necessity of rigorous application of competition rules from which SMEs can also benefit; Or. en Amendment 10 Anna Cavazzini on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1b. Highlights that in a global economy, potential distortion to competition in the internal market emanates from companies established outside the EU; calls on the Commission to enhance global cooperation on competition to provide for a level-playing field with third countries, particularly when it comes to State aid; asks furthermore for unfair trading practices to be addressed effectively, including taking into account social and environmental dumping; AM\1220902EN.docx 7/40 PE662.163v01-00 EN Or. en Amendment 11 Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt, Sylvie Guillaume, Adriana Maldonado López, Maria- Manuel Leitão-Marques, Andreas Schieder, Maria Grapini, Biljana Borzan Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1b. Acknowledges that third-country companies benefitting from State aid or other subsidies might potentially distort the competition in the internal market; in this regard, calls on the Commission to take appropriate measures to ensure fair market access, in every concerned sector, such as the aviation; Or. en Amendment 12 Tomislav Sokol, Edina Tóth, Romana Tomc, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Deirdre Clune, Maria da Graça Carvalho Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1b. Recalls that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states that Union policies shall ensure a high level of consumer protection; Or. en Amendment 13 Tomislav Sokol, Edina Tóth, Romana Tomc, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Arba Kokalari, Deirdre Clune, Maria da Graça Carvalho PE662.163v01-00 8/40 AM\1220902EN.docx EN Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1c. Recalls that competition rules protect the integrity of the single market and help create a level playing field for businesses, while also undoubtedly helping to better protect consumer rights and promote innovations; Or. en Amendment 14 Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt, Sylvie Guillaume, Adriana Maldonado López, Maria- Manuel Leitão-Marques, Andreas Schieder, Maria Grapini, Biljana Borzan Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1c. Calls on the Commission to assess how competition policy can further contribute to the European Green Deal objectives; Or. en Amendment 15 Marc Angel, Evelyne Gebhardt, Sylvie Guillaume, Adriana Maldonado López, Maria- Manuel Leitão-Marques, Andreas Schieder, Maria Grapini, Biljana Borzan Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1d. Notes that the Commission responded to the outbreak of the COVID- 19 crisis by adopting special competition rules which should remain temporary; recalls in this context that state aid guaranteed under the extraordinary AM\1220902EN.docx 9/40 PE662.163v01-00
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship B-10409 Brussels Belgium
    Ms Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship B-10409 Brussels Belgium 10 September 2013 Dear Vice-President Reding Pre-trial detention in the EU As the European Commission, Council and Parliament have recognised, ‘excessively long periods of pre-trial detention are detrimental to the individual, can prejudice cooperation between the Member States, and do not represent the values for which the European Union stands’.1 We are writing to you now to follow-up on the European Union’s work to tackle this problem and to urge the Commission to continue its work in this area beyond the current legislative programme, including developing a timeframe for tabling a legislative proposal setting common minimum standards for the use of pre-trial detention in the EU. We understand that the European Commission is at this stage intending to focus on monitoring the implementation of three Framework Decisions: the European Supervision Order (ESO); the Prisoner Transfer Framework Decision; and the Framework Decision on the application of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions and is not currently proposing legislation. We take note of this emphasis on effective implementation but would highlight that only one of the three Framework Decisions, the ESO, has the potential to impact on pre-trial detention. While it may go some way to alleviating problems faced by non-nationals by enabling them to return home while awaiting trial, even this is very limited in scope. In addition, the three Framework Decisions are all pre-Lisbon measures and the European Commission therefore currently has no enforcement powers if problems with their implementation are identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Valdis DOMBROVSKIS Executive Vice-President of the European
    European Commission Valdis DOMBROVSKIS Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI Executive Vice-President Member of the European Commission of the European Commission Agriculture An Economy that Works for People Ms Irène Tolleret Member of the European Parliament European Parliament Per e-mail: [email protected] Brussels, 44/oi¡m/l EM/ss, Ares(2021 )s_350474 Dear Honourable Member, We would like to thank you and the co-signatories for your letter of 12 January 2021 requesting the establishment of a compensation fund to help the European wine sector, which is affected by the additional import duties that the United States have applied to certain European wines since 18 October 2019 and covering some additional wine products since 12 January 2021. The Commission is fully aware of the difficulties that the EU wine sector continues to encounter due in particular to these tariffs, but also to the COVID-19 pandemic. As indicated previously, the Commission considers that the best aid to be provided in such circumstances is to allow greater flexibility in the promotion of European wines on third-country markets. The Commission encourages the wine sector to make use of the promotion policy instruments targeting third countries1 and the promotion measure of support programmes in the wine sector (NSPs)2 as they can help consolidate their position on existing markets or seek new opportunities in other markets. Useful flexibilities for operators promoting EU wine in third countries were introduced already in January 20203 and will be extended with the adoption of the prolongation of the COVID-19 package4. 1 More information on the promotion policy and its funding opportunities is available at https://ec.europa.eu/chafea/agri/ 2 Article 45(b) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Interim Report
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0138/2020 20.7.2020 INTERIM REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law (COM(2017)0835 – 2017/0360R(NLE)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Juan Fernando López Aguilar RR\1210506EN.docx PE650.665v03-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_Consent_Interim CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION.............................................3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................24 ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT..................................................................................................................29 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY.30 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ...................................................................38 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ....................................39 PE650.665v03-00 2/39 RR\1210506EN.docx EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law (COM(2017)0835 – 2017/0360R(NLE)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2017)0835), – having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 2 and Article 7(1) thereof,
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-001156/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (Renew), Henna Virkkunen (PPE), Ondřej Kovařík (Renew), Sylvie Guillaume (S&D), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Anne Sander (PPE), Paolo De Castro (S&D), Bernard Guetta (Renew), Dominique Riquet (Renew), Irène Tolleret (Renew), Jérémy Decerle (Renew) Subject: Reduced VAT rates for equestrian and equine activities In Europe, breeding, sport and leisure, racing and employment in the equestrian and equine sector are agricultural activities which are well established in our territories. They actively contribute to the dynamism of rural areas and are still today activities which are sometimes performed by low-skilled workers. Pony clubs and equestrian centres are important private sports employers. Since 2012, following a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union, several Member States have done a U-turn with respect to the application of a reduced VAT rate for equestrian and equine activities, a move which has had extremely harmful consequences for the sector. The health crisis linked to COVID-19 compounds this precarious economic situation. A reduction in taxation would meet the challenges of employment, sustainable tourism, access to sport for all, including people with disabilities, and equine well-being, all of which the EU promotes. It would fit perfectly with the Commission’s ambition and long-term vision for rural areas. The finalisation of the reform of VAT rates, proposed in January 2018 by the Commission, is a priority for the Portuguese Presidency of the Council. How does the Commission intend to support the Council in finalising the current reform? PE690.310v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson Brussels, 30
    EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson Brussels, 30 October 2020 Dear Commissioner Johansson, It has been nearly two months since the fire in Moria left more than 12,000 persons destitute and the response from Greece, the EU and member states has been pitiful. Whilst responding to urgent needs warranted setting up a temporary camp on Lesvos, we now risk seeing this temporary solution turning into a permanent one. But, based on the account of refugees themselves and experienced service providers, the conditions in the new camp are worse than the conditions in Moria. Almost 8,000 people – mostly families with children – have been forced to live in tents and face dire living conditions. Rapid protection assessments1 carried out at the end of September identified numerous risks to the people living in the camp. These include limited access to food with reports of residents fainting out of hunger, inadequate measures against Covid-19 as well as no drainage nor sewerage system on site, with only one toilet being shared by twenty people and no access for persons with physical disabilities. Due to a lack of running water, residents are forced to wash themselves in the sea – this raises a risk to children who could drown. This lack of sanitary facilities coupled with the insufficient lighting exposes women to an increased risk of sexual and gender-based violence. Residents are unable to access health services or legal aid. Children have no access to education and truly risk becoming a lost generation. We are increasingly concerned that the camp, located by the beach, will not withstand the against adverse weather conditions, such as strong wind and rain.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results
    Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Parlement Européen (2019-2024)
    Le Parlement européen (2019-2024) Le parlement européen est composé de députés européens qui sont au nombre de 705 (L’un des sièges espagnol reste vacant à ce jour). A cela il faut ajouter 32 membres de la Commission et 32 membres du Conseil. Le parlement européen comprend donc au total 769 membres. Les députés européens sont élus au suffrage universel direct pour exercer un mandat de 5 ans renouvelable, en réalité nous avons 28 délégations de députés européens et le nombre de députés par pays est proportionnel à la population du pays (plus il y a d’habitants, plus l’Etat compte de députés). Le minimum de députés est fixé à 6 pour les Etats les moins peuplés (Malte, Estonie…). Depuis 1979, les députés européens sont élus au suffrage universel direct par les citoyens de chaque Etat membre. Le Parlement européen constitue le deuxième plus grand espace démocratique au monde (après l’Inde et avant les USA). FONCTIONS : Le Parlement européen exerce les fonctions classiques d’un parlement national, c’est un lieu de débat. Les députés européens évoquent les sujets d’intérêt européen, ils peuvent adopter des motions, des décisions sur n’importe quel sujet concernant l’Europe. La deuxième fonction du Parlement européen est de voter le budget annuel de 160 milliards d’euros avec le Conseil de l’Union européenne (très faible car à titre de comparaison, le budget annuel américain réservé uniquement à la défense est de 300 milliards). La troisième fonction du Parlement européen est de voter la législation européenne avec le Conseil toujours, il a le droit d’amendement, d’opposition et même le droit d’initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on the Draft Council Implementing Decision on The
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0100/2020 8.5.2020 * REPORT on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in the United Kingdom (14247/2019 – C9-0198/2019 – 2019/0819(CNS)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Juan Fernando López Aguilar RR\1204849EN.docx PE647.041v03-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_CNS_LegAct_rej Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act Amendments by Parliament set out in two columns Deletions are indicated in bold italics in the left-hand column. Replacements are indicated in bold italics in both columns. New text is indicated in bold italics in the right-hand column. The first and second lines of the header of each amendment identify the relevant part of the draft act under consideration. If an amendment pertains to an existing act that the draft act is seeking to amend, the amendment heading includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Amendments by Parliament in the form of a consolidated text New text is highlighted in bold italics. Deletions are indicated using either the ▌symbol or strikeout. Replacements are indicated by highlighting the new text in bold italics and by deleting or striking out the text that has been replaced.
    [Show full text]