DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 & 2020 Facility Scoring Methodology for Cost & Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 & 2020 Facility Scoring Methodology for Cost & Quality 2019 & 2020 Facility Scoring Methodology for Cost & Quality Designations In keeping with its goal of providing members with high-quality, lower-cost health care, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina (BCBSNC) developed the following methodology to best evaluate the quality and efficiency of partner facilities. Based on evaluation results, BCBSNC will designate PPO network facilities as Low Cost High Quality, High Quality, or Not Designated (NOTE: Critical Access facilities will maintain their Critical Access designation). This document describes the methodology used by Blue Cross NC for the 2019 and 2020 Cost & Quality Designations and is provided for informational purposes only. Designation Overview BCBSNC will base its designations on quality and efficiency. Any facility that does not meet the quality criteria will not be designated. Any practice that meets the quality criteria will also be assessed on efficiency criteria to determine its final designation. Please note, the designation is made at the facility level and only includes In-network Facilities contracted with BCBSNC. The initial driver of eligibility is the ability to meet the quality standards set forth in BCBSNC’s Facility-level standards (described below). Facilities that are unable to meet the quality standard for the network are not designated. Facilities that qualify for designation based on their quality evaluation will then be evaluated against BCBSNC’s efficiency criteria (described below) to determine if the organization meets the standards for the Low Cost High Quality designation. Facilities that meet both the quality and efficiency standards are designated as Low Cost High Quality. Facilities that meet the quality standard, but do not attain the efficiency standard, are designated as High Quality. Tiered Network Product Quality Thresholds for Facilities The quality scoring methodology considers measures from the Hospital Compare plus a risk adjusted readmission rate measure from BCBSNC claim data. These measures assess Health Outcomes and Patient Safety (70%), Resource Use (10%), and Patient Experience (20%). The performance on each measure derives is scored based on percentile and combined into an overall score. A facility’s quality score must be above the lower quartile compared to all partner facilities to be considered a pass of the quality evaluation. See Appendix below for underlying measures and methodology. Efficiency Threshold for Facilities With the quality standards in place, BCBSNC then analyzed claims to stratify facilities on the basis of efficiency performance.The objective of this analysis was to distinguish between the Low Cost High Quality designation and the High Quality designation. Facilities were assigned to cohorts based on bed size, total volume, transfers and the provision of certain types of services including burns, trauma, transplants, maternity, hip and knee arthroplasty, spine surgery, oncology, complex cardiology, and complex neurology.Bed size was obtained from the NC Division of Health Services Regulation and service volume was determined from claims from October 2016 through September 2017. Peer cohorts were established using Cohort Analysis, which identifies patterns of similarity in the selected characteristics and then classifies Facilities into groups, called “Peer Cohorts” here forward. 1 Cluster Variable Defined as DRGs/MDCs defining service line Hospital Beds Total hospital beds (Source: NC Division of N/A Health Services Regulation, downloaded 2/9/17 from www.ncdhhs.gov/dhsr/reports.htm) Total Volume Total volume All Transfer Dichotomous indicator if volume of cases as All a result of a transfer from another facility designated by discharge status => 10 Maternity Volume of maternity cases / total volume MDC 14 Hip & Knee Volume of hip and knee arthroplasty DRGs 469, 470, 480, 481, 461, 462, 483, Arthroplasty cases/total volume 468, 466, 467 Spine Surgery Dichotomous indicator if volume of spinal DRGs 460, 455, 456, 457, 458, 453, 454, surgery cases => 10 471, 472, 473, 459, 515, 516 Oncology Dichotomous indicator if volume of MDC 17, DRGs 054, 055, 333, 334, 374, oncology cases >= 10 375, 376, 435, 436, 437, 582, 583, 666, 667, 668, 669, 670, 711, 712, 722, 723, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 744, 826, 827, 745, 754, 755, 756, 686, 687, 656, 657, 658, 584, 585, 597, 598, 688, 828, 829, 830, 843, 844, 845 Complex Dichotomous indicator if volume of complex DRGs 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 231, Cardiology cardiology cases >= 10 232, 233, 234, 228, 229, 230, 235, 236, 242, 243, 244, 21, 217, 218, 231, 232, 228, 229, 260, 261, 270, 271, 224, 225, 226, 227, 273, 274 Complex Dichotomous indicator if volume of DRGs 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 031, 032, Neurology craniotomy cases >= 10 033 Burns or Trauma Dichotomous indicator if total volume of MDC 22, 24 trauma or burns => 10 Transplants Dichotomous indicator if total volume of DRGs 001, 002, 005, 006, 007, 008, 014, transplants => 5 016, 017, 652 Next, two metrics of efficiency performance were constructed based on inpatient and outpatient claims for Facilities within each peer cohort. Data preparation and analytical approaches for the evaluation are described below. Inpatient Costs Analyses were conducted on inpatient case data for services performed between October 2016 – September 2017. Includes Inpatient allowed facility costs only (i.e. no professional or ancillary costs) Lines of business: Blue Options (Group Underwritten, ASO, State Health Plan, Blue Select/Blue Select Plus, CDHP), Blue Advantage (Individual, CDHP). Excludes denials, Medicare crossovers, COB, and State Health Plan retirees. To reduce the effect of outliers, allowed costs were truncated at the 95th percentile by MS DRG. Analysis is limited to those MS DRGs performed at least 30 times at a minimum of two facilities statewide. Two inpatient cost metrics were computed for each facility called “observed” and “expected” costs. o Expected costs were determined by calculating the average cost for each MS DRG within a peer cohort if there were at least 30 cases in a minimum of 2 facilities; if there was insufficient volume within a peer cohort, the expected costs reflect the average cost for Facilities statewide. o Observed costs are equivalent to the allowed costs. Observed and expected costs were summed for all cases with sufficient MS DRG volume. 2 All DRGs were evaluated. If DRGs are missing, there was not enough volume to be evaluated. In the following table, "Cohort" refers to the DRG analysis within the cohort only. "Statewide" refers to the DRG analysis done statewide due to the low volume. MS Description Peer Peer Peer Peer Peer Peer DRG Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Cohort 4 Cohort 5 Cohort 6 003 ECMO OR TRACH W MV 96+ HRS OR PDX EXC statewide statewide statewide cohort FACE, MOUTH & NECK W MAJ O.R. 004 TRACH W MV 96+ HRS OR PDX EXC FACE, statewide statewide statewide statewide statewide MOUTH & NECK W/O MAJ O.R. 014 ALLOGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT statewide 016 AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT W statewide CC/MCC 023 CRANIO W MAJOR DEV IMPL/ACUTE COMPLEX statewide statewide cohort CNS PDX W MCC OR CHEMO IMPLANT 025 CRANIOTOMY & ENDOVASCULAR INTRACRANIAL statewide cohort cohort PROCEDURES W MCC 026 CRANIOTOMY & ENDOVASCULAR INTRACRANIAL statewide statewide statewide cohort PROCEDURES W CC 027 CRANIOTOMY & ENDOVASCULAR INTRACRANIAL statewide statewide cohort cohort PROCEDURES W/O CC/MCC 029 SPINAL PROCEDURES W CC OR SPINAL statewide statewide cohort NEUROSTIMULATORS 030 SPINAL PROCEDURES W/O CC/MCC statewide statewide cohort 039 EXTRACRANIAL PROCEDURES W/O CC/MCC statewide statewide cohort cohort statewide 054 NERVOUS SYSTEM NEOPLASMS W MCC statewide statewide statewide cohort 055 NERVOUS SYSTEM NEOPLASMS W/O MCC statewide statewide statewide statewide cohort 057 DEGENERATIVE NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS statewide statewide statewide statewide statewide statewide W/O MCC 060 MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS & CEREBELLAR ATAXIA statewide statewide statewide statewide W/O CC/MCC 064 INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE OR CEREBRAL statewide statewide cohort cohort INFARCTION W MCC 065 INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE OR CEREBRAL statewide cohort cohort cohort cohort statewide INFARCTION W CC OR TPA IN 24 HRS 066 INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE OR CEREBRAL statewide cohort cohort cohort cohort statewide INFARCTION W/O CC/MCC 069 TRANSIENT ISCHEMIA statewide statewide statewide cohort statewide statewide 070 NONSPECIFIC CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS W statewide statewide statewide statewide MCC 074 CRANIAL & PERIPHERAL NERVE DISORDERS W/O statewide statewide cohort statewide statewide MCC 076 VIRAL MENINGITIS W/O CC/MCC statewide statewide statewide statewide statewide 087 TRAUMATIC STUPOR & COMA, COMA <1 HR statewide statewide statewide cohort W/O CC/MCC 091 OTHER DISORDERS OF NERVOUS SYSTEM W statewide statewide statewide statewide MCC 092 OTHER DISORDERS OF NERVOUS SYSTEM W CC statewide statewide statewide statewide statewide 093 OTHER DISORDERS OF NERVOUS SYSTEM W/O statewide statewide statewide statewide statewide CC/MCC 100 SEIZURES W MCC statewide statewide statewide statewide statewide 101 SEIZURES W/O MCC statewide cohort cohort cohort cohort statewide 103 HEADACHES W/O MCC statewide statewide cohort cohort cohort statewide 132 CRANIAL/FACIAL PROCEDURES W/O CC/MCC statewide statewide cohort statewide 134 OTHER EAR, NOSE, MOUTH & THROAT O.R. statewide statewide statewide statewide PROCEDURES W/O CC/MCC 149 DYSEQUILIBRIUM statewide statewide statewide statewide statewide 153 OTITIS MEDIA & URI W/O MCC statewide statewide statewide
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effectiveness of Distal Tibial Osteotomy
    Nozaka et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2020) 21:31 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3061-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Effectiveness of distal tibial osteotomy with distraction arthroplasty in varus ankle osteoarthritis Koji Nozaka* , Naohisa Miyakoshi, Takeshi Kashiwagura, Yuji Kasukawa, Hidetomo Saito, Hiroaki Kijima, Shuichi Chida, Hiroyuki Tsuchie and Yoichi Shimada Abstract Background: In highly active older individuals, end-stage ankle osteoarthritis has traditionally been treated using tibiotalar arthrodesis, which provides considerable pain relief. However, there is a loss of ankle joint movement and a risk of future arthrosis in the adjacent joints. Distraction arthroplasty is a simple method that allows joint cartilage repair; however, the results are currently mixed, with some reports showing improved pain scores and others showing no improvement. Distal tibial osteotomy (DTO) without fibular osteotomy is a type of joint preservation surgery that has garnered attention in recent years. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports on DTO with joint distraction using a circular external fixator. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of DTO with joint distraction using a circular external fixator for treating ankle osteoarthritis. Methods: A total of 21 patients with medial ankle arthritis were examined. Arthroscopic synovectomy and a microfracture procedure were performed, followed by angled osteotomy and correction of the distal tibia; the ankle joint was then stabilized after its condition improved. An external fixator was used in all patients, and joint distraction of approximately 5.8 mm was performed. All patients were allowed full weight-bearing walking immediately after surgery. Results: The anteroposterior and lateral mortise angle during weight-bearing, talar tilt angle, and anterior translation of the talus on ankle stress radiography were improved significantly (P < 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • FGM in Canada
    Compiled by Patricia Huston MD, MPH Scientific Communications International, Inc for the Federal Interdepartmental Working Group on FGM. Copies of this report are available from: Women's Health Bureau Health Canada [email protected] The Canadian Women's Health Network 203-419 Graham Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 0M3 fax: (204)989-2355 The opinions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Government of Canada or any of the other organizations represented. Dedication This report is dedicated to all the women in the world who have undergone FGM and to all the people who are helping them live with and reverse this procedure. This report is part of the ongoing commitment of Canadians and the Government of Canada to stop this practice in Canada and to improve the health and well-being of affected women and their communities. Executive Summary Female genital mutilation (FGM), or the ritual excision of part or all of the external female genitalia, is an ancient cultural practice that occurs around the world today, especially in Africa. With recent immigration to Canada of peoples from Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea, Sudan and Nigeria, women who have undergone this practice are now increasingly living in Canada. It is firmly believed by the people who practise it, that FGM improves feminine hygiene, that it will help eliminate disease and it is thought to be the only way to preserve family honour, a girl's virginity and her marriageability. FGM has a number of important adverse health effects including risks of infection and excessive bleeding (often performed when a girl is pre-pubertal).
    [Show full text]
  • Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions
    Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions Spine Surgery Procedure Codes CPT CODES DESCRIPTION Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition 20930 to code for primary procedure) 20931 Allograft, structural, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); local (eg, ribs, spinous process, or laminar 20936 fragments) obtained from same incision (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); morselized (through separate skin or fascial 20937 incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); structural, bicortical or tricortical (through separate 20938 skin or fascial incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) 20974 Electrical stimulation to aid bone healing; noninvasive (nonoperative) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22206 body subtraction); thoracic Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22207 body subtraction); lumbar Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22208 body subtraction); each additional vertebral segment (List separately in addition to code for
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Health Spine and Joint Code List
    Priority Health Joint Services Code List Category CPT® Code CPT® Code Description Joint Services 23000 Removal of subdeltoid calcareous deposits, open Joint Services 23020 Capsular contracture release (eg, Sever type procedure) Joint Services 23120 Claviculectomy; partial Joint Services 23130 Acromioplasty or acromionectomy, partial, with or without coracoacromial ligament release Joint Services 23410 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; acute Joint Services 23412 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open;chronic Joint Services 23415 Coracoacromial ligament release, with or without acromioplasty Joint Services 23420 Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty) Joint Services 23430 Tenodesis of long tendon of biceps Joint Services 23440 Resection or transplantation of long tendon of biceps Joint Services 23450 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior; Putti-Platt procedure or Magnuson type operation Joint Services 23455 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior;with labral repair (eg, Bankart procedure) Joint Services 23460 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type; with bone block Joint Services 23462 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type;with coracoid process transfer Joint Services 23465 Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, posterior, with or without bone block Joint Services 23466 Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, any type multi-directional instability Joint Services 23470 ARTHROPLASTY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY ARTHROPLASTY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; TOTAL SHOULDER [GLENOID
    [Show full text]
  • Knee Joint Surgery: Open Synovectomy
    Musculoskeletal Surgical Services: Open Surgical Procedures; Knee Joint Surgery: Open Synovectomy POLICY INITIATED: 06/30/2019 MOST RECENT REVIEW: 06/30/2019 POLICY # HH-5588 Overview Statement The purpose of these clinical guidelines is to assist healthcare professionals in selecting the medical service that may be appropriate and supported by evidence to improve patient outcomes. These clinical guidelines neither preempt clinical judgment of trained professionals nor advise anyone on how to practice medicine. The healthcare professionals are responsible for all clinical decisions based on their assessment. These clinical guidelines do not provide authorization, certification, explanation of benefits, or guarantee of payment, nor do they substitute for, or constitute, medical advice. Federal and State law, as well as member benefit contract language, including definitions and specific contract provisions/exclusions, take precedence over clinical guidelines and must be considered first when determining eligibility for coverage. All final determinations on coverage and payment are the responsibility of the health plan. Nothing contained within this document can be interpreted to mean otherwise. Medical information is constantly evolving, and HealthHelp reserves the right to review and update these clinical guidelines periodically. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from HealthHelp.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Curriculum for Surgical Technology Sixth Edition
    Core Curriculum for Surgical Technology Sixth Edition Core Curriculum 6.indd 1 11/17/10 11:51 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Healthcare sciences A. Anatomy and physiology 7 B. Pharmacology and anesthesia 37 C. Medical terminology 49 D. Microbiology 63 E. Pathophysiology 71 II. Technological sciences A. Electricity 85 B. Information technology 86 C. Robotics 88 III. Patient care concepts A. Biopsychosocial needs of the patient 91 B. Death and dying 92 IV. Surgical technology A. Preoperative 1. Non-sterile a. Attire 97 b. Preoperative physical preparation of the patient 98 c. tneitaP noitacifitnedi 99 d. Transportation 100 e. Review of the chart 101 f. Surgical consent 102 g. refsnarT 104 h. Positioning 105 i. Urinary catheterization 106 j. Skin preparation 108 k. Equipment 110 l. Instrumentation 112 2. Sterile a. Asepsis and sterile technique 113 b. Hand hygiene and surgical scrub 115 c. Gowning and gloving 116 d. Surgical counts 117 e. Draping 118 B. Intraoperative: Sterile 1. Specimen care 119 2. Abdominal incisions 121 3. Hemostasis 122 4. Exposure 123 5. Catheters and drains 124 6. Wound closure 128 7. Surgical dressings 137 8. Wound healing 140 1 c. Light regulation d. Photoreceptors e. Macula lutea f. Fovea centralis g. Optic disc h. Brain pathways C. Ear 1. Anatomy a. External ear (1) Auricle (pinna) (2) Tragus b. Middle ear (1) Ossicles (a) Malleus (b) Incus (c) Stapes (2) Oval window (3) Round window (4) Mastoid sinus (5) Eustachian tube c. Internal ear (1) Labyrinth (2) Cochlea 2. Physiology of hearing a. Sound wave reception b. Bone conduction c.
    [Show full text]
  • Once in a Lifetime Procedures Code List 2019 Effective: 11/14/2010
    Policy Name: Once in a Lifetime Procedures Once in a Lifetime Procedures Code List 2019 Effective: 11/14/2010 Family Rhinectomy Code Description 30160 Rhinectomy; total Family Laryngectomy Code Description 31360 Laryngectomy; total, without radical neck dissection 31365 Laryngectomy; total, with radical neck dissection Family Pneumonectomy Code Description 32440 Removal of lung, pneumonectomy; Removal of lung, pneumonectomy; with resection of segment of trachea followed by 32442 broncho-tracheal anastomosis (sleeve pneumonectomy) 32445 Removal of lung, pneumonectomy; extrapleural Family Splenectomy Code Description 38100 Splenectomy; total (separate procedure) Splenectomy; total, en bloc for extensive disease, in conjunction with other procedure (List 38102 in addition to code for primary procedure) Family Glossectomy Code Description Glossectomy; complete or total, with or without tracheostomy, without radical neck 41140 dissection Glossectomy; complete or total, with or without tracheostomy, with unilateral radical neck 41145 dissection Family Uvulectomy Code Description 42140 Uvulectomy, excision of uvula Family Gastrectomy Code Description 43620 Gastrectomy, total; with esophagoenterostomy 43621 Gastrectomy, total; with Roux-en-Y reconstruction 43622 Gastrectomy, total; with formation of intestinal pouch, any type Family Colectomy Code Description 44150 Colectomy, total, abdominal, without proctectomy; with ileostomy or ileoproctostomy 44151 Colectomy, total, abdominal, without proctectomy; with continent ileostomy 44155 Colectomy,
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Synovectomy with 166Ho-Ferric Hydroxide: a First Experience
    Radiation Synovectomy with 166Ho-Ferric Hydroxide: A First Experience Sedat Ofluoglu, MD1; Eva Schwameis, MD2; Harald Zehetgruber, MD2; Ernst Havlik, PhD3; Axel Wanivenhaus, MD2; Ingrid Schweeger, MD1; Konrad Weiss, MD4; Helmut Sinzinger, MD1; and Christian Pirich, MD1 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 2Department of Orthopedics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 3Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Vienna, Austria; and 4Department of Nuclear Medicine, General Hospital of Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria lage, leading to the progressive loss of joint function and Radiation synovectomy (RS) is indicated when conventional significant disability. Treatment of chronic synovitis using pharmacologic treatment of chronic synovitis has not relieved radiation synovectomy (RS) aims to stop the inflammatory its symptoms. The use of radionuclides that are bound to ferric process causing pain, disability, and nonreversible structural hydroxide (FH) particles has been shown to be effective and damage to the joint (1–3). RS has been in clinical use for 166 safe for this procedure. Ho-FH macroaggregates offer prom- 50y(4) primarily as an alternative to surgical treatment (5). ising properties for RS but there is a lack of clinical data. We Safety is one of the most important aspects when radionu- investigated the efficacy and safety of 166Ho-FH in a prospective clinical trial in patients suffering from chronic synovitis. Meth- clides are applied therapeutically. The use of ferric hydrox- ods: Twenty-four intraarticular injections were performed in 22 ide (FH) particles as a carrier may offer some advantages patients receiving a mean activity of 1.11 GBq (range, 0.77–1.24 over other carriers with respect to the frequency and degree GBq) 166Ho-FH.
    [Show full text]
  • GENDER DYSPHORIA TREATMENT Policy Number: 2016T0580A Effective Date: January 1, 2017
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Medical Policy GENDER DYSPHORIA TREATMENT Policy Number: 2016T0580A Effective Date: January 1, 2017 Table of Contents Page Related Commercial Policy INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE .......................................... 1 Blepharoplasty, Blepharoptosis and Brow Ptosis BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS ...................................... 1 Repair COVERAGE RATIONALE ............................................. 2 Botulinum Toxin A and B DEFINITIONS .......................................................... 3 Cosmetic and Reconstructive Procedures APPLICABLE CODES ................................................. 4 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES ...................................... 8 Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Analogs CLINICAL EVIDENCE ................................................. 8 Panniculectomy and Body Contouring Procedures U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION ................... 11 Rhinoplasty and Other Nasal Surgeries CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES ... 11 Speech Language Pathology Services REFERENCES .......................................................... 11 POLICY HISTORY/REVISION INFORMATION ................ 12 Community Plan Policy Gender Dysphoria Treatment Related Optum Guideline Gender Dysphoria INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE This Medical Policy provides assistance in interpreting UnitedHealthcare benefit plans. When deciding coverage, the member specific benefit plan document must be referenced. The terms of the member specific benefit plan document [e.g., Certificate of Coverage (COC), Schedule of
    [Show full text]
  • April 2013, Volume 5, Issue 4
    VOLUME 5 MONTHLY ISSUE MEDICAL STAFF 4 NEWSLETTER ProgressNotes April TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 2013 this issue CPOE P.1 Doctor’s Day P.2 MEC Approvals P.3-4 Medical Staff Calendar P.5 New Providers P.6 Roster Updates P.6 What is it? CPOE Select Rewards is a tiered program geared to reward pro- CPOE viders as they expand their use of CPOE (Computerized Provider Order Entry). Computerized How are providers enrolled in the CPOE Select Rewards Provider Order Program? Entry Select Enrollment is automatic as you or your group begins CPOE. Rewards Program How does it work? Providers qualify for monthly raffles based on meeting or exceed- ing CPOE percentage goals for their assigned tier. When will winners be announced? Winners will be announced the second Monday of every month, beginning in April. CPOE Monthly Raffle includes several prizes including an i-Pad mini. Individualized program details will be sent out to providers. Please call CPOE hotline at x2763 (xCPOE) if you have any questions. Doctor’s Day Thank you to all the physicians who attended the Doctor’s Day Celebration at Torrance Memorial on Wednesday, March 27th. The event was a success with many physicians attending to enjoy a great meal, music and prizes. Congratulations to Dr. Lauren Nguyen and Dr. James Flores, the two lucky winners of the iPad mini and the thirty physicians who also won gift cards to Nordstroms, California Pizza Kitchen, HealthLinks, Starbucks and iTunes. Torrance Memorial appreciates our physicians’ dedication and commitment to the health of our community. Medical Executive Committee Approvals The following items were presented and actions were approved at the March 12, 2013 Medical Executive Committee meeting: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Dysphoria Treatment – Commercial Medical Policy
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Medical Policy Gender Dysphoria Treatment Policy Number: 2021T0580J Effective Date: April 1, 2021 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Related Commercial Policies Coverage Rationale ....................................................................... 1 • Blepharoplasty, Blepharoptosis and Brow Ptosis Documentation Requirements ...................................................... 3 Repair Definitions ...................................................................................... 4 • Botulinum Toxins A and B Applicable Codes .......................................................................... 5 • Cosmetic and Reconstructive Procedures Description of Services ................................................................. 9 • Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Analogs Benefit Considerations .................................................................. 9 Clinical Evidence ......................................................................... 10 • Habilitative Services and Outpatient Rehabilitation U.S. Food and Drug Administration ........................................... 15 Therapy References ................................................................................... 15 • Panniculectomy and Body Contouring Procedures Policy History/Revision Information ........................................... 16 • Rhinoplasty and Other Nasal Surgeries Instructions for Use ..................................................................... 17 Community Plan Policy • Gender Dysphoria
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICULAR BLEEDING (HEMARTHROSIS) in HEMOPHILIA an ORTHOPEDIST’S POINT of VIEW Second Edition
    TREATMENT OF HEMOPHILIA April 2008 · No. 23 ARTICULAR BLEEDING (HEMARTHROSIS) IN HEMOPHILIA AN ORTHOPEDIST’S POINT OF VIEW Second edition E. C. Rodríguez-Merchán Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon La Paz University Hospital Madrid, Spain Associate Professor of Orthopedics University Autonoma Madrid, Spain Published by the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH), 2000; revised 2008. © Copyright World Federation of Hemophilia, 2008 The WFH encourages redistribution of its publications for educational purposes by not-for-profit hemophilia organizations. In order to obtain permission to reprint, redistribute, or translate this publication, please contact the Programs and Education Department at the address below. This publication is accessible from the World Federation of Hemophilia’s eLearning Platform at eLearning.wfh.org Additional copies are also available from the WFH at: World Federation of Hemophilia 1425 René Lévesque Boulevard West, Suite 1010 Montréal, Québec H3G 1T7 CANADA Tel. : (514) 875-7944 Fax : (514) 875-8916 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.wfh.org The Treatment of Hemophilia series is intended to provide general information on the treatment and management of hemophilia. The World Federation of Hemophilia does not engage in the practice of medicine and under no circumstances recommends particular treatment for specific individuals. Dose schedules and other treatment regimes are continually revised and new side-effects recognized. WFH makes no representation, express or implied, that drug doses or other treatment recommendations in this publication are correct. For these reasons it is strongly recommended that individuals seek the advice of a medical adviser and/or to consult printed instructions provided by the pharmaceutical company before administering any of the drugs referred to in this monograph.
    [Show full text]