Tuna Fishing Ground Modeling Based on Geographic Information System in Bitung Sea Waters
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
POTENTIALS and INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES GOVERNOR VICE GOVERNOR OLLY DONDOKAMBEY, SE Drs
GOVERNMENT OF NORTH SULAWESI PROVINCE POTENTIALS AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES GOVERNOR VICE GOVERNOR OLLY DONDOKAMBEY, SE Drs. S. O. KANDOW NORTH SULAWESI IN THE WORLD MAP GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Geography The Province of North Sulawesi is located in Northern Peninsula of Sulawesi Island, and constitutes one of the three (3) Provinces in Indonesia which located in Northern part of Khatulistiwa Line (equator line), Two other Provinces are; South Sulawesi Province and Aceh Province. On the geographical position perspective, North Sulawesi Province is located between 0.300 – 4.300 North Latitude and 1210-1270 East Longitude. Barang ALKI I ALKI II ALKI III 2. Territory Length and Division 15,272.44 km2 area is spacious, has 4 cities and 11 regancies. Most of the land area consists of mountains, hills and valleys. Height from sea level is varied 0 - > 1,000 meters. Barang Bukit Doa, Tomohon 3. Climate North Sulawesi is a tropical area that is affected by the wind muzon. In November to April the West wind blows that brought rain on the north coast , while in May to October there is a change of dry southerly winds. The average rainfall ranges from 2000-3000 mm per year, and the number of rainy days between 90-139 days. Temperatures range from 20 0C - 32 0C. Barang Mount Lokon , Tomohon Pulau Bunaken 4. Demography Total population of 2.54725 million people, scattered in the regancy/city as follows : REGANCIES/CITIES POPULATION KOTA MANADO 484.744 KOTA BITUNG 223.980 KOTA TOMOHON 97.775 KOTA KOTAMOBAGU 123.623 KAB. MINAHASA UTARA 222.062 KAB. -
PROFIL PARIWISATA PESISIR KABUPATEN MINAHASA, KOTA MANADO Dan KOTA BITUNG, SULAWESI UTARA
PROFIL PARIWISATA PESISIR KABUPATEN MINAHASA, KOTA MANADO dan KOTA BITUNG, SULAWESI UTARA Tim Peneliti PPLH & Sumberdaya Alam UNSRAT untuk ATLAS Sumberdaya Wilayah Pesisir Minahasa – Manado – Bitung Ir. Pankie N. L. Pangemanan, MSi, Ir. Joudie Luntungan, MSi, Dra. J. Waworuntu SH, MSi, Ir. Henneke Pangkey, MSc, PhD TE-02/08-I CRC/URI CRMP Phone : (62-21) 7209596 Ratu Plaza Building 18th Floor Fax : (62-21) 7207844 Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 9 E-mail : [email protected] Jakarta Selatan 10270, Indonesia www.pesisir.or.id PROFIL PARIWISATA PESISIR KABUPATEN MINAHASA, KOTA MANADO dan KOTA BITUNG, SULAWESI UTARA Oleh: Tim Peneliti PPLH & Sumberdaya Alam UNSRAT untuk ATLAS Sumberdaya Wilayah Pesisir Minahasa – Manado – Bitung Ir. Pankie N. L. Pangemanan, MSi, Ir. Joudie Luntungan, MSi, Dra. J. Waworuntuk SH, MSi, Ir. Henneke Pangkey, MSc, PhD Persiapan dan pencetakan dokumen ini didanai oleh Proyek Pesisir/CRMP sebagai bagian dari Program Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam (NRM) USAID-BAPPENAS dan USAID-CRC/URI Program Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Pesisir (CRMP). Keterangan lebih lengkap mengenai publikasi Proyek Pesisir dapat diperoleh di www.pesisir.or.id Keterangan lebih lengkap mengenai publikasi Program NRM dapat diperoleh di www.nrm.or.id Keterangan lebih lengkap mengenai publikasi Coastal Resources Center dapat diperoleh di www.crc.uri.edu Dicetak di: Jakarta, Indonesia Kutipan: Tim Peneliti PPLH & Sumberdaya Alam UNSRAT untuk ATLAS Sumberdaya Wilayah Pesisir Minahasa – Manado – Bitung, (2002), Profil Pariwisata Pesisir Kabupaten Minahasa, Kota Manado Dan Kota Bitung, Sulawesi Utara, Laporan Teknis Proyek Pesisir, TE-02/08-I, Coastal Resources Center, University Of Rhode Island, Jakarta, Indonesia, 19 halaman KATA PENGANTAR Salah satu potensi unggulan Provinsi Sulawesi Utara adalah sektor Pariwisata. -
Studi Kasus: Kota Manado, Kota Bitung, Kota Tomohon, Dan Kota Kotamobagu)
Agri-SosioEkonomi Unsrat, ISSN 1907– 4298, Volume 14 Nomor 1, Januari 2018 : 241 - 246 KAJIAN BATAS PENGARUH KOTA TERHADAP WILAYAH SEKITARNYA (STUDI KASUS: KOTA MANADO, KOTA BITUNG, KOTA TOMOHON, DAN KOTA KOTAMOBAGU) Anna Maria Watung Supit O. Esry H. Laoh Melissa L. G. Tarore ABSTRACT This study aims to find out how far the limits of city influence on the surrounding area (case study: Manado City, Bitung City, Tomohon City, and Kotamobagu City). The data used in this research is secondary data. The variables measured in this study include population (soul) and distance (km). In this research the analysis used is Breaking Point. The study took place from October to April starting from preparation, data collection, to the production of research results. The location of the research was conducted in Manado City. The results showed that the development of City Region (BWK) of Manado City, Bitung, Tomohon, and Kotamobagu, has different influence limits. BWK Manado City Center has a stronger boundary of influence over Airmadidi, Tondano Utara, Bitung and Amurang areas. BWK Bitung City Center has stronger limits of influence, especially on Kauditan and Airmadidi areas. While the area of Manado has lower influence limits. The limits of influence of BWK Tomohon City Center have a stronger boundary effect on North Tondano and Sonder areas. While the area of Manado has lower influence limits. Similarly, the Influence Limits of BWK Kotamobagu City Center has a stronger influence limit on the Amurang and Tutuyan areas. Then the relationship of the four cities shows that Manado City has more influence than Bitung, Tomohon and Kotamobagu. -
Maksimalisasi Pencapaian Targ Melalui Implementasi Fam Di
MAKSIMALISASI PENCAPAIAN TARGET PS MELALUI IMPLEMENTASI FAM DI WITEL SULUT MALUT by ALDA APRILIA ARUNGTASIK / 830045 (Asman WOC) FATMAWATY / 810010 (Asman Fulfillment) BACKGROUND CAKUPAN LAYANAN WITEL SULUT MALUT PROP. MALUKU UTARA PROP. SULAWESI UTARA Witel Sulut Malut terdiri atas 3 Kandatel yaitu Kandatel Bitung, Kandatel Kotamobagu dan Luas Wilayah 14.979 km2 ; Kandatel Ternate serta didukung oleh 26 STO Luas Wilayah 145.819,1 km²; Terdiri dari 11 Kab & 4 Kota ; Terdiri dari 8 Kab & 2 Kota ; Juml Penduduk 2,412 juta ; a. Manado c. Kandatel Kotamobagu : Juml. Penduduk 1,162 juta ; a.1 STO Manado Centrum (MOC) c.1 STO Kotamobagu (KTG) House Hold 240.062 House Hold 611.314 a.2 STO Bahu (BAH) c.2 STO Amurang (AMR) a.3 STO Paniki (PIK) c.3 STO Tutuyan (TUT) a.4 STO Airmadidi (AMD) c.4. STO Lolak b. Kandatel Bitung : d. Kandatel Ternate : b.1 STO Bitung (BIT) d.1 STO Ternate (TNT) b.2 STO Kauditan (KAU) d.2 STO Soasio (SSI) b.3 STO Tondano (TDN) d.3 STO Jailolo (JLL) b.4 STO Tomohon (TMH) d.4 STO Labuha (LBH) b.5 STO Langowan (LAN) d.5 STO Tobelo (TOB) b.6 STO Beo (BEO) d.6 STO Sanana (SNN) b.7 STO Tahuna (THN) d.7 STO Mangole (MGL) b.8 STO Tagulandang (TAG) d.8 STO Morotai (MTA) b.9 STO Hulusiau (HLS) d.9 STO Galela (GLL) NAMA KAB / KOTA IBUKOTA KAB. BOLAANG MONGONDOW LOLAK KAB. BOLAANG MONGONDOW SELATAN BOLANG UKI KAB. BOLAANG MONGONDOW TIMUR TUTUYAN NAMA KAB / KOTA IBUKOTA KAB. -
Labor Conditions in the Tuna Sector of Bitung, Indonesia Annex I
Labor Conditions in the Tuna Sector B I T U N G , I N D O N E S I A The USAID Oceans and Fisheries Partnership (USAID Oceans) 2018 Release Date: December 2018 Contract Number: AID-486-C-15-00001 Contract Period: May 15, 2015 to May 13, 2020 Submitted by: Verité Telephone: +1 413 253 9227 Email: Allison Arbib, [email protected] Website: www.verite.com This document was produced by Verité for the USAID Oceans and Fisheries Partnership, a United States Agency for International Development/Regional Development Mission for Asia (USAID/RDMA) Activity. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 4 Methodology ....................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Research Objectives and Background ..................................................................................... 7 1.2 Research Phases ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Research Design and Sampling .................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Analytic Framework .................................................................................................................. 10 1.5 Limitations .................................................................................................................................... 11 1.6 Informed Consent and Confidentiality ................................................................................. -
Capacities in Facing Natural Hazards: a Small Island Perspective
Int J Disaster Risk Sci (2014) 5:247–264 www.ijdrs.com DOI 10.1007/s13753-014-0031-4 www.springer.com/13753 ARTICLE Capacities in Facing Natural Hazards: A Small Island Perspective Mercy M. F. Rampengan • Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono • Lisa Law • J. C. Gaillard • Jeffrey Sayer Published online: 13 December 2014 Ó The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Isolated communities on small islands are often Keywords Human and social characterized as vulnerable and marginalized. We studied resources Á Indonesia Á Livelihood diversity Á Natural the recent history of Laingpatehi, a village on Ruang Island hazards Á Remote marginal communities Á Small islands off the north coast of Sulawesi, Indonesia to show that the marginalization-vulnerability nexus can be offset by capacity and social cohesion to enable sustainable liveli- hoods. The island has been impacted by volcanic eruptions, 1 Introduction earthquakes, and competition for marine resources from mainland-based fishermen. The community has shown a Vulnerability to multiple hazards is thought to be a char- remarkable ability to cope and prosper in the face of a acteristic of small, remote island communities (Lewis series of external hazards. We used a sustainable liveli- 2009). Their small size and isolation allegedly expose them hoods approach to identify the assets that enabled the vil- to a wide range of internal and external hazards. Several lagers to cope. Strong social cohesion was central to the studies have documented impacts of disasters on Small ability to organize the community and confront hazards. A Island Developing States (SIDS) (Briguglio 1995;Me´heux diversified livelihood strategy drawing on the small island et al. -
2.1.26 Indonesia North Sulawesi Port of Bitung
2.1.26 Indonesia North Sulawesi Port of Bitung Port Overview Port Picture Description and Contacts of Key Companies Port Performance Discharge Rates and Terminal Handling Charges Berthing Specifications General Cargo Handling Berths Port Handling Equipment Container Facilities Customs Guidance Terminal Information MULTIPURPOSE TERMINAL GRAIN AND BULK HANDLING MAIN STORAGE TERMINAL Stevedoring Hinterland Information Port Security Port Overview The port of Bitung is located in Bitung City, about 40 km East of Manado City. There are two ports in Bitung City managed by Pelindo IV North Sulawesi; co nventional port and container port. The conventional port segment consists of LCT berth, passenger berth, and container berth, while the container port is specially for container handling activities. Port of Bitung is functioning as the East International Gate port in North Sulawesi that is visited and anchored by passenger ships between major cities in Indonesia and internationally. Goods supplied to North Sulawesi mainly come from Makassar and Surabaya by sea transport through Conventional Port of Bitung and are then distributed to Manado City, other districts and Islands. Port website: https://inaport4.co.id/branch/read/1/22 https://inaport4.co.id/ Key port information can also be found at: http://www.maritime-database.com Port Location and Contact Country Indonesia Province or District North Sulawesi Province Nearest Town or City Bitung City with Distance from Port 1 km Port's Complete Name Port of Bitung Latitude 01°26’00” S Longitude 125°11’00”E Managing Company or Port Authority PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia IV (Persero) Cabang Pelabuhan Bitung Management Contact Person Makmur Syam Operation Manager Container Port Bitung M. -
LAMPIRAN : KEPUTUSAN MENTERI PERTANIAN NOMOR : 69/Kpts/HK
LAMPIRAN : KEPUTUSAN MENTERI PERTANIAN NOMOR : 69/Kpts/HK.310/8/2001 TANGGAL : 1 AGUSTUS 2001 TENTANG : TEMPAT-TEMPAT PEMASUKAN DAN PENGELUARAN MEDIA PEMBAWA ORGANISME PENGGANGGU TUMBUHAN KARANTINA I. Tempat-tempat Pemasukan (Impor) Media Pembawa Organisme Pengganggu Tumbuhan Karantina ke Dalam Wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia. A. Bandar Udara: 1. Polonia - Medan 13. Sepinggan – Balikpapan 2. Tabing - Padang 14. Supadio - Pontianak 3. Hang Nadim – Batam 15. Juwata – Tarakan 4. St Mahmud Badaruddin II - palembang 16. Sam ratulangi – Menado 5. Halim Perdana Kusuma – Jakarta 17. Hasanuddin – Makassar 6. Soekarno-Hatta – Cengkareng 18. Patimura – Ambon 7. Husein Sastranegara – Bandung 19. Frans Kaisiepo – Biak 8. Adi Sumarmo – Solo 20. Tembaga Pura – Timika 9. Juanda – Surabaya 21. Sentani – Jayapura 10. Ngurah Rai – Denpasar 22. St Iskandar Muda -Banda Aceh 11. Selaparang – Mataram 23. St Syarif Kasim II – Pekanbaru 12. EI Tari - Kupang 24. Kijang – Tanjung Pinang B. Pelabuhan Laut dan Pelabuahn Sungai : 1. Malahayati/Krueng Raya-Banda Aceh 31. 2. Sabang – Sabang 32. Waingapu - Waingapu 3. Lhokseumawe – Lhokseumawe 33. Pontianak- Pontianak 4. Meulaboh – Meulaboh 34. Banjarmasin – Banjarmasin 5. Sinabang – Sinabang 35. Balikpapan – Balikpapan 6. Tj Balai Asahan – Tj Balai Asahan 36. Lingkas- Tarakan 7. Belawan – Medan 37. Samarinda – Samarinda 8. Sibolga – Sibolga 38. Nunukan – Nunukan 9. Teluk Bayur – Padang 39. Sebatik – Sebatik 10. Dumai – Bengkalis 40. Bontang – Bontang 11. Pekanbaru – Pekanbaru 41. Makassar – Makassar 12. Tanjung Pinang – Tanjung Pinang 42. Malili – Ujung Pandang 13. Batu Ampar – Batam 43. Pare – Pare 14. Sekupang – Batam 44. Nusantara – Kendari 15. Tj Balai Karimun-Tj Balai Karimun 45. Pantoloan –Pantoloan 16. Lagoi – Lagoi 46. Ambon – Ambon 17. Panjang – Bandar Lampung 47. -
North Sulawesi Province Soekarno Bridge in Manado Orth Sulawesi Is Located on Minahasa, the Northern Peninsula of the Island of Sulawesi
PROVINCE OVERVIEW INDONESIA INDUSTRIAL ESTATES DIRECTORY 2018-2019 North Sulawesi Province Soekarno bridge in Manado orth Sulawesi is located on Minahasa, the northern peninsula of the island of Sulawesi. Its natural Basic Data borders are the Celebes Sea to the north, the Molucca NSea to the east and south; while in the west, there is the province of Gorontalo. North Sulawesi moreover includes Capital: Manado the Talaud and Sangihe groups of islands in the Celebes Sea. The capital is Manado City, near the northeastern Major Cities: tip of the province’s mainland. Administratively, North • Bitung : 269.368 inhabitants Sulawesi is divided into eleven regencies and four cities. • Kotamobagu : 116.180 inhabitants In developing the province, the government has set • Tomohon : 95.011 inhabitants the vision of “realizing North Sulawesi as a self-sufficient 2 economy with a sovereign government and culture”. This Size of Province: 15.273 km vision is planned to be achieved by enhancing economic Population: independence, strengthening the agricultural sector and (1) Province : 2.412.118 inhabitants use of maritime resources, and encouraging the industry (2) Province Capital : 473.499 inhabitants and services sector. Under the National Medium Term Development Salary (2018): Plan of 2015-2019, the central government has planned The provincial monthly minimum wage : to create a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in Bitung, as a USD 209,21. designated center of fishery, coconut processing, and pharmaceuticals. The infrastructures along the site, such as toll road, water distribution network, enhancement of electricity capacity, will also be further developed to Educational Attainment accommodate the needs of potential investors. -
Bitung, North Sulawesi, Indonesia
Policy Review for APEC Low-Carbon Model Town Phase 5 Final Report Bitung, North Sulawesi, Indonesia June 2016 Report for the APEC Energy Working Group APEC Low-Carbon Model Town (LCMT) Phase 5 - Study Group B Policy Review: Bitung, Indonesia APEC Project: APEC Low-Carbon Model Town (LCMT) Project Phase 5: EWG 06 2014A Produced by Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre Inui Building, Kachidoki, 1-13-1, Kachidoki, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0054, Japan Phone: (81) 3-5144-8551 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://aperc.ieej.or.jp/ For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2016 APEC Secretariat APEC#216-RE-01.11 i APEC Low-Carbon Model Town (LCMT) Phase 5 - Study Group B Policy Review: Bitung, Indonesia TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................................................... iv RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................................................................................................................................1 PART I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................8 -
PEMODELAN KECELAKAAN SEPEDA MOTOR PADA RUAS JALAN DI KOTA ATAMBUA Margareth E
Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. III, No. 2, September 2014 PEMODELAN KECELAKAAN SEPEDA MOTOR PADA RUAS JALAN DI KOTA ATAMBUA Margareth E. Bolla ([email protected] ) Dosen pada Jurusan Teknik Sipil, FST Undana Tri Mardiyati W. Sir ([email protected] ) Dosen pada Jurusan Teknik Sipil, FST Undana Christofel N. Bara ([email protected] ) Penamat dari Jurusan Teknik Sipil, FST Undana ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisa faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kecelakaan sepeda motor di Kota Atambua melalui pemodelan. Pemodelan menggunakan metode Generalized Linear Method dengan standar signifikansi sebesar 95%. Berdasarkan hasil pengolahan data hasil survei lalulintas dan survei kendaraan menggunakan program GenStat diperoleh persamaan pemodelan kecelakaan MCA = 0.002902 exp [-0.986 LbLajur – 0.674 LbBahu Jalan + 0.1761 Kecepatan] . Hasil pemodelan menunjukan bahwa faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kecelakaan sepeda motor adalah Total Lebar Ruas Jalan dengan koefisien sebesar -0.986, Total Lebar Bahu Jalan dengan koefisien sebesar -0.674, dan 85-Percentile Kecepatan Kendaraan dengan koefisien sebesar 0.1761. Analisa Deskriptif menunjukan bahwa kecelakaan sepeda motor sering terjadi pada pengendara dengan jenis kelamin laki-laki dengan jumlah kasus terbanyak sebesar 40 kasus, dengan rentang usia pengendara 18-25 tahun, yaitu 17 kasus. Kecelakaan sering terjadi pada pengendara dengan profesi swasta, yaitu sebesar 17 kasus dan paling sering terjadi pada rentang waktu pukul 12.00-17.59 yaitu sebanyak 7 kasus. Dari kriteria tipe tabrakan, kecelakaan sering terjadi dengan tipe Tabrak Pejalan Kaki, yaitu terjadi sebanyak 5 kasus dengan tingkat keparahan terbanyak Luka Berat, yaitu sebanyak 14 kasus. Kata kunci: Pemodelan Kecelakaan, Generalized Linear Models ABSTRACT This study aims to describe and analyze the factors that affect motorcycle accident through modeling. -
The Project for Enhancement of the Disaster Management Capacity of Bnpb and Bpbd Project Completion Report
NATIONAL AGENCY FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT (BNPB) REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE PROJECT FOR ENHANCEMENT OF THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT CAPACITY OF BNPB AND BPBD PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT NOVEMBER 2015 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. ASIAN DISASTER REDUCTION CENTER GE JR 15-152 NATIONAL AGENCY FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT (BNPB) REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE PROJECT FOR ENHANCEMENT OF THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT CAPACITY OF BNPB AND BPBD PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT NOVEMBER 2015 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. ASIAN DISASTER REDUCTION CENTER Project Completion Report Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures Abbreviations Page 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 OUTLINE OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................... 2 1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT .......................................................................................................... 7 2. METHODOLOGY OF TECHNICAL TRANSFER .................................................................. 15 2.1 DESCRIPTIONS OF ITEMS TO BE IMPLEMENTED .............................................................................. 15 2.2 COMMON ITEMS ...........................................................................................................................