DOCSLIB.ORG

Estado Diario Subdirección De Marcas 10/08/2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estado Diario Subdirección De Marcas 10/08/2018 Estado Diario Subdirección de Marcas 10/08/2018 Sección M1: Observaciones de Forma Solicitud Representante Tipo signo Marca Observaciones 1272515 ESTUDIO FEDERICO VILLASECA Y COMPAÑIA, Denominativa GALLAGHER Atendido lo dispuesto en el art. 9 letra c) del Reglamento en representación de Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. de la Ley N° 19.039 en concordancia con lo dispuesto en la Resolución Exenta N° 391 de 2017 de INAPI, y habiéndose advertido ciertas imprecisiones o ítems de redacción confusa en la descripción de los productos y/o servicios solicitados, se observa lo que a continuación se indica: En clase 35, reclasifique en clase 36 “evaluación de costos de indemnización laboral” y “evaluación de costos de proveedores médicos para la indemnización de trabajadores y planes de tratamiento a seguir” como “evaluación de costos financieros de indemnización laboral” y “evaluación de costos financieros de proverdores médicos para la indemnización de trabajadores y planes de tratamiento a seguir” respectivamente; corrija “ergonómicos” por “económicos” en “evaluaciones de riesgos ergonómicos relacionados con asuntos comerciales y evaluaciones estadísticas de riesgos ergonómicos de medidas de desempeño de reclamos de seguros para terceros”; reclasifique en clase 36 “intercambio de seguros en la naturaleza de un mercado que ofrece a los compradores de seguros y de otros productos de beneficios, una variedad de planes y productos de múltiples proveedores”; reclasifique en clase 45 “desarrollo y coordinación de proyectos de voluntarios para organizaciones de caridad”. A escrito de fecha 11/07/2018: Por cumplido lo ordenado en clase 36. 1 Estado Diario Subdirección de Marcas 10/08/2018 Sección M1: Observaciones de Forma Solicitud Representante Tipo signo Marca Observaciones 1272516 ESTUDIO FEDERICO VILLASECA Y COMPAÑIA, Mixta G Atendido lo dispuesto en el art. 9 letra c) del Reglamento en representación de Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. de la Ley N° 19.039 en concordancia con lo dispuesto en la Resolución Exenta N° 391 de 2017 de INAPI, y habiéndose advertido ciertas imprecisiones o ítems de redacción confusa en la descripción de los productos y/o servicios solicitados, se observa lo que a continuación se indica: En clase 35, reclasifique en clase 36 “evaluación de costos de indemnización laboral” y “evaluación de costos de proveedores médicos para la indemnización de trabajadores y planes de tratamiento a seguir” como “evaluación de costos financieros de indemnización laboral” y “evaluación de costos financieros de proverdores médicos para la indemnización de trabajadores y planes de tratamiento a seguir” respectivamente; corrija “ergonómicos” por “económicos” en “evaluaciones de riesgos ergonómicos relacionados con asuntos comerciales y evaluaciones estadísticas de riesgos ergonómicos de medidas de desempeño de reclamos de seguros para terceros”; reclasifique en clase 36 “intercambio de seguros en la naturaleza de un mercado que ofrece a los compradores de seguros y de otros productos de beneficios, una variedad de planes y productos de múltiples proveedores”; reclasifique en clase 45 “desarrollo y coordinación de proyectos de voluntarios para organizaciones de caridad”. A escrito de fecha 11/07/2018: Por cumplido lo ordenado en clase 36. 2 Estado Diario Subdirección de Marcas 10/08/2018 Sección M1: Observaciones de Forma Solicitud Representante Tipo signo Marca Observaciones 1273674 Covarrubias & Cia, en representación de Denominativa LOGISNEXT Atendido lo dispuesto en el art. 9 letra c) del Reglamento MITSUBISHI LOGISNEXT CO., LTD. de la Ley N° 19.039 en concordancia con lo dispuesto en la Resolución Exenta N° 391 de 2017 de INAPI, y habiéndose advertido ciertas imprecisiones o ítems de redacción confusa en la descripción de los productos y/o servicios solicitados, se observa lo que a continuación se indica: : A escrito de 7 de junio de 2018.A lo Principal:Téngase por corregidas clases 12 y 35. En clase 7, se observa, no ha lugar a modificación, se le reitera observación apara elimine el producto solicitado para “sistemas de almacenamiento automático” por cuanto no pertenece a la presente clase. 3 Estado Diario Subdirección de Marcas 10/08/2018 Sección M1: Observaciones de Forma Solicitud Representante Tipo signo Marca Observaciones 1274948 Christian Ernst S., en representación de Microsoft Denominativa MICROSOFT UNIFIED SUPPORT Atendido lo dispuesto en el art. 9 letra c) del Reglamento Corporation de la Ley N° 19.039 en concordancia con lo dispuesto en la Resolución Exenta N° 391 de 2017 de INAPI, y habiéndose advertido ciertas imprecisiones o ítems de redacción confusa en la descripción de los productos y/o servicios solicitados, se observa lo que a continuación se indica: A escrito de 26 de junio de 2018:Se reitera, aclare "implementación", "integración" y "administración" en "diseño, implementación, integración y administración de hardware, software y redes computacionales, y sistemas de tecnología de la información" por error con otras clases, debiendo indicar al menos de qué se tratan los servicios, a fin de ayudarlo en su búsqueda se le indica que en el Clasificador de Niza, Ud. podrá revisar la clasificación de los servicios, para lo cual se le entrega el siguiente link: https://ion.inapi.cl/Marca/ClasificadorNiza.aspxNo ha lugar a la modificación de "administración de sistemas informáticos para terceros" por "gestión de sistemas computacionales para terceros", por no aclarar la nueva redacción el servicio que solicita. Se reitera, aclare "administración de sistemas informáticos para terceros".No ha lugar a modificación para “gestión de incidentes para probar y desplegar la infraestructura de TI, sistemas operativos, sistemas de bases de datos, software, hardware y aplicaciones web”, especifique el servicio a solicitar conforme al Clasificador de Niza para la clase 42.. 4 Estado Diario Subdirección de Marcas 10/08/2018 Sección M1: Observaciones de Forma Solicitud Representante Tipo signo Marca Observaciones 1275837 ESTUDIO CAREY LTDA., en representación de Mixta BRAND SAFWAY Atendido lo dispuesto en el artículo 9 letra b) del Brand Shared Services LLC Reglamento de la Ley 19.039, referido a la especificación clara de la marca, cumpla con señalar la traducción al español de la marca solicitada o de los elementos en idioma extranjero de los cuales está compuesto el signo pedido. A escrito de fecha 16/05/2018: Respecto de cobertura de clase 6, 7, 19, 37, 40, 41 y 42 se reitera íntegramente observación de fecha 03/04/2018 por cuanto aclaración de cobertura es confusa al no quedar claro cuáles son los productos cuya redacción esta modificando o eliminando. Al aclarar cobertura observada señale expresamente cuales son los productos que se le han observado, su correspondiente modificación o si lo ha eliminado o no de la cobertura, puesto que de lo contrario, y dado lo extensa y confusa redacción de la cobertura se hace imposible verificar claramente si se está cumpliendo o no con la observación precedente. 5 Estado Diario Subdirección de Marcas 10/08/2018 Sección M1: Observaciones de Forma Solicitud Representante Tipo signo Marca Observaciones 1275838 ESTUDIO CAREY LTDA., en representación de Denominativa BRANDSAFWAY Atendido lo dispuesto en el art. 9 letra c) del Reglamento Brand Shared Services LLC de la Ley N° 19.039 en concordancia con lo dispuesto en la Resolución Exenta N° 391 de 2017 de INAPI, y habiéndose advertido ciertas imprecisiones o ítems de redacción confusa en la descripción de los productos y/o servicios solicitados, se observa lo que a continuación se indica: .. A escrito de fecha 16/05/2018: Respecto de cobertura de clase 6, 7, 19, 37, 40, 41 y 42 se reitera íntegramente observación de fecha 03/04/2018 por cuanto aclaración de cobertura es confusa al no quedar claro cuáles son los productos cuya redacción esta modificando o eliminando. Al aclarar cobertura observada señale expresamente cuales son los productos que se le han observado, su correspondiente modificación o si lo ha eliminado o no de la cobertura, puesto que de lo contrario, y dado lo extensa y confusa redacción de la cobertura se hace imposible verificar claramente si se está cumpliendo o no con la observación precedente. 6 Estado Diario Subdirección de Marcas 10/08/2018 Sección M1: Observaciones de Forma Solicitud Representante Tipo signo Marca Observaciones 1280806 ESTUDIO FEDERICO VILLASECA Y COMPAÑIA, Denominativa APTIV Atendido lo dispuesto en el art. 9 letra c) del Reglamento en representación de Delphi Technologies, LLC de la Ley N° 19.039 en concordancia con lo dispuesto en la Resolución Exenta N° 391 de 2017 de INAPI, y habiéndose advertido ciertas imprecisiones o ítems de redacción confusa en la descripción de los productos y/o servicios solicitados, se observa lo que a continuación se indica: En clase 40, se reitera, especifique los “materiales” en “tratamiento de materiales”; elimine “productos según pedido y especificación de terceros”, “sistemas de vehículos de motor y sus partes según pedido y especificación de terceros y “sistemas avanzados de asistencia al conductor según pedido y especificación de terceros”, pues no se trata de descripciones de servicios, pues lo que se solicitó con fecha 25/04/2018 fue que eliminara "fabricación personalizada de productos según el pedido y especificación de terceros", "fabricación personalizada de partes y sistemas de vehículos de motor según el pedido y la especificación de terceros", "fabricación personalizada de sistemas avanzados de asistencia al conductor según el pedido y especificación de terceros"
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENERGY DRINK Buyer’S Guide 2007
    ENERGY DRINK buyer’s guide 2007 DIGITAL EDITION SPONSORED BY: OZ OZ3UGAR&REE OZ OZ3UGAR&REE ,ITER ,ITER3UGAR&REE -ANUFACTUREDFOR#OTT"EVERAGES53! !$IVISIONOF#OTT"EVERAGES)NC4AMPA &, !FTERSHOCKISATRADEMARKOF#OTT"EVERAGES)NC 777!&4%23(/#+%.%2'9#/- ENERGY DRINK buyer’s guide 2007 OVER 150 BRANDS COMPLETE LISTINGS FOR Introduction ADVERTISING EDITORIAL 1123 Broadway 1 Mifflin Place The BEVNET 2007 Energy Drink Buyer’s Guide is a comprehensive compilation Suite 301 Suite 300 showcasing the energy drink brands currently available for sale in the United States. New York, NY Cambridge, MA While we have added some new tweaks to this year’s edition, the layout is similar to 10010 02138 our 2006 offering, where brands are listed alphabetically. The guide is intended to ph. 212-647-0501 ph. 617-715-9670 give beverage buyers and retailers the ability to navigate through the category and fax 212-647-0565 fax 617-715-9671 make the tough purchasing decisions that they believe will satisfy their customers’ preferences. To that end, we’ve also included updated sales numbers for the past PUBLISHER year indicating overall sales, hot new brands, and fast-moving SKUs. Our “MIA” page Barry J. Nathanson in the back is for those few brands we once knew but have gone missing. We don’t [email protected] know if they’re done for, if they’re lost, or if they just can’t communicate anymore. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR John Craven In 2006, as in 2005, niche-marketed energy brands targeting specific consumer [email protected] interests or demographics continue to expand. All-natural and organic, ethnic, EDITOR urban or hip-hop themed, female- or male-focused, sports-oriented, workout Jeffrey Klineman “fat-burners,” so-called aphrodisiacs and love drinks, as well as those risqué brand [email protected] names aimed to garner notoriety in the media encompass many of the offerings ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER within the guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Emergency Department Visits Involving Energy Drinks: a Continuing Public Health Concern January 10, 2013
    January 10, 2013 Update on Emergency Department Visits Involving Energy Drinks: A Continuing Public Health Concern Energy drinks are flavored beverages containing high amounts of caffeine and typically other additives, such as vitamins, taurine, IN BRIEF herbal supplements, creatine, sugars, and guarana, a plant product containing concentrated caffeine. These drinks are sold in cans and X The number of emergency bottles and are readily available in grocery stores, vending machines, department (ED) visits convenience stores, and bars and other venues where alcohol is sold. involving energy drinks These beverages provide high doses of caffeine that stimulate the doubled from 10,068 visits in central nervous system and cardiovascular system. The total amount 2007 to 20,783 visits in 2011 of caffeine in a can or bottle of an energy drink varies from about 80 X Among energy drink-related to more than 500 milligrams (mg), compared with about 100 mg in a 1 ED visits, there were more 5-ounce cup of coffee or 50 mg in a 12-ounce cola. Research suggests male patients than female that certain additives may compound the stimulant effects of caffeine. patients; visits doubled from Some types of energy drinks may also contain alcohol, producing 2007 to 2011 for both male a hazardous combination; however, this report focuses only on the and female patients dangerous effects of energy drinks that do not have alcohol. X In each year from 2007 to Although consumed by a range of age groups, energy drinks were 2011, there were more patients originally marketed
    [Show full text]
  • Sheet1 Page 1 Name of Drink Caffeine (Mg) 5 Hour Energy 60
    Sheet1 Name of drink Size (mL) Caffeine (mg) 5 Hour Energy 60 Equivalent of a cup of coffee Amp Energy (Original) 710 213 Amp Energy (Original) 473 143 Amp Energy Overdrive 473 142 Amp Energy Re-Ignite 473 158 Amp Energy Traction 473 158 Bawls Guarana 473 103 Bawls Guarana Cherry 473 100 Bawls Guarana G33K B33R 296 80 Bawls Guaranexx Sugar Free 473 103 Beaver Buzz Black Currant Energy 355 188 Beaver Buzz Citrus Energy 355 188 Beaver Buzz Green Machine Energy 473 200 Big Buzz Chronic Energy 473 200 BooKoo Energy Citrus 710 360 BooKoo Energy Wild Berry 710 360 Cheetah Power Surge Diet 710 None? Frank's Energy Drink 500 160 Frank's Energy Drink Lime 250 80 Frank's Energy Drink Pineapple 250 80 Full Throttle Unleaded 473 141 Hansen's Energy Pro 246 39 Hardcore Energize Bullet Blue Rage 85.7 300 Hype Energy Pro (Special Edition) 355 114 Hype Energy MFP 473 151 Inked Chikara 473 151 Inked Maori 473 151 Jolt Endurance Shot 60 200 Jolt Orange Blast 695 220 Lost (Original) 473 160 Lost Five-O 473 160 Mini Thin Rush (6 Hour) 60 200 Monster (Original) 710 246 Monster Assault 473 164 Monster Energy (Original) 473 170 Monster Khaos 710 225 Monster Khaos 473 150 Monster M-80 473 164 Monster MIXXD 473 Monster Reduced Carb 473 140 NOS (Original) 473 200 NOS (Original)(Bottle) 650 343 NOS Fruit Punch 473 246.35 Premium Green Tea Energy 355 119 Premium Iced Tea Energy 355 102 Premium Pink Energy 355 120 Red Bull 250 80 Red Bull 355 113.6 Page 1 Sheet1 Red Rain 250 80 Rocket Shot 54 50 Rockstar Burner 473 160 Rockstar Burner 710 239 Rockstar Diet 473 160
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Marketing Unveiled
    SUGAR-SWEETENED BEVERAGE MARKETING UNVEILED VOLUME 1 VOLUME 2 VOLUME 3 VOLUME 4 THE PRODUCT: A VARIED OFFERING TO RESPOND TO A SEGMENTED MARKET A Multidimensional Approach to Reduce the Appeal of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages This report is a central component of the project entitled “A Multidimensional Approach to Reducing the Appeal of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSBs)” launched by the Association pour la santé publique du Québec (ASPQ) and the Quebec Coalition on Weight-Related Problems (Weight Coalition) as part of the 2010 Innovation Strategy of the Public Health Agency of Canada on the theme of “Achieving Healthier Weights in Canada’s Communities”. This project is based on a major pan-Canadian partnership involving: • the Réseau du sport étudiant du Québec (RSEQ) • the Fédération du sport francophone de l’Alberta (FSFA) • the Social Research and Demonstration Corporation (SRDC) • the Université Laval • the Public Health Association of BC (PHABC) • the Ontario Public Health Association (OPHA) The general aim of the project is to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by changing attitudes toward their use and improving the food environment by making healthy choices easier. To do so, the project takes a three-pronged approach: • The preparation of this report, which offers an analysis of the Canadian sugar-sweetened beverage market and the associated marketing strategies aimed at young people (Weight Coalition/Université Laval); • The dissemination of tools, research, knowledge and campaigns on marketing sugar-sweetened beverages (PHABC/OPHA/Weight Coalition); • The adaptation in Francophone Alberta (FSFA/RSEQ) of the Quebec project Gobes-tu ça?, encouraging young people to develop a more critical view of advertising in this industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Side Effects of Energy Drinks Caffeine
    Side Effects of Energy Drinks By: Sarah Holmboe, M.A., YSB Parent Education Coordinator Are there really side effects from the ingredients in energy drinks? The information below has been adapted from “Energy Drink Side Effects” from http://www.caffeineinformer.com/energy-drink-side-effects#2. Energy drinks are popular among youth, who are consuming more and more. Youth typically consume these drinks for a burst of energy, whether it’s to help them stay up late to study, or to help them stay awake the next day. However, recent research suggests that there are risks associated with the over-consumption of energy drinks. Energy drinks may contain supplements and vitamins and are required to list warnings on the label about consuming more than the recommended serving. In moderation, most people will have no adverse, short-term side effects from drinking energy drinks. However, the long-term side effects from consuming energy drinks aren’t fully understood as of yet. Let’s take a look at the most common energy drink ingredients and list the potential side effects that could result from ingesting too much of them. Caffeine This is the most common energy drink ingredient and one of the most widely consumed substances in the world. Energy drinks have varying levels of caffeine; here are some of the popular brands and their caffeine content: 10-Hour Energy 422 mg 5-Hour Energy 200 mg Monster 160 mg Mountain Dew Kickstart 92 mg Red Bull 80 mg Rockstar 160 mg Vamp Energy 240 mg (To find the caffeine content of your favorite drink, check out www.caffeineinformer.com) Caffeine tolerance varies between individuals, but for most people a dose of over 200-300mg may produce some initial symptoms, such as restlessness, increased heartbeat, and insomnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Energy Drinks on Metabolism at Rest and During Submaximal Treadmill Exercise in College Age Males
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by TopSCHOLAR Original Research Effects of Energy Drinks on Metabolism at Rest and During Submaximal Treadmill Exercise in College Age Males JANAE NIENHUESER1*, GREGORY A BROWN1‡, BRANDON S. SHAW2‡, and INA SHAW3‡ 1Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Leisure Studies, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, NE, USA; 2Tshwane University of Technology, Department of Sport, Rehabilitation and Dental Sciences, Pretoria, Gauteng, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA; 3Vaal University of Technology, Department of Marketing and Sport Management, Vanderbijlpark, Gauteng, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA * Denotes undergraduate student author, ‡Denotes professional author ABSTRACT Int J Exerc Sci 4(1) : 65-76, 2011. Energy drinks are widely available and popular among athletes and non-athletes. However, the effects of energy drinks on resting and exercise energy expenditure and metabolism remain largely unknown. On four separate occasions, baseline measurements of resting metabolic rate (RMR) and Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER) were obtained in ten healthy males (21.4 ± 1.6 y, 77.60± 7.5 kg, 180.0 ± 7.1 cm). Then, in a randomly assigned cross-over design, the subjects consumed 473 ml of one of three commercially available energy drinks or a placebo and then RMR and RER were measured 1 hour later. The subjects then engaged in 15 minutes of treadmill exercise at 50% of V02max, during which RER and oxygen consumption (VO2) were measured. RMR was not changed by placebo, but increased (P<0.05, means ± se) above baseline by 10 ± 2.5%, 15.0 ± 2.9%, and 15.3 ± 2.9%, following Energy Drink One, Energy Drink Two, and Energy Drink Three (respectively) with no differences between energy drinks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Alcohol Energy Drink Order
    STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GR0\11.n"H LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER The Michigan Liquor Control Commission (hereinafter Commission) has before it a certain matter involving the sale and distribution of Alcohol Energy Drinks in the State of Michigan_ The Commission has a reasonable belief that Alcohol Energy Drinks present a threat to the public health and safety and twenty-nine (29) Attorneys General from across the nation are of the opinion that Alcohol Energy Drinks pose serious health and safety risks to American youth. The popularity of Alcohol Energy Drinks is increasing among college students and underage drinkers and the safety of ingesting a mixture of stimulants and beer, e.g. Alcohol Energy Drinks, has not been established. The safety of these intentionally infused stimulants, Le. Caffeine, Taurine, Guarana, Ginkgo Biloba, Ginseng, or other herbal or chemical substances, at uncontrolled levels - mixed with alcohol, has not been established by scientific evidence or the FDA as "generally recognized as safe" additives to alcoholic beverages (GRAS). The Commission exercises complete control of the State's alcoholic beverage traffic through the Constitution 1963, Article 4, §40, and has the sole right, power and duty to control the State's alcoholic beverage traffic pursuant to MCL 436.1201(2). The Commission may disapprove any beer label submitted for registration that is deemed to promote intemperance, or intoxication, or to be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public. [Commission Rule 436.1611(1)(d)] The administrative process allows the Commission, upon discovery, to correct any errors that might have occurred in Its approval of Alcohol Energy Drinks.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Drinks: Health Risks and Toxicity
    Research Energy drinks: health risks and toxicity Naren Gunja he new millennium has ush- MB BS, FACEM, Medical Abstract 1 ered in a wave of synthetic, Director and Toxicologist, Objectives: To describe the epidemiology and toxicity of caffeinated energy and Clinical Senior caffeinated high-energy 2 T drink exposures in Australia. Lecturer drinks targeted at the youth market. Design, setting and subjects: Retrospective observational study analysing data Jared A Brown Over the past 10 years, the consump- BPharm(Hons), MPH, from calls regarding energy drink exposures recorded in the database of an Senior Poisons Specialist tion of caffeinated beverages intended Australian poisons information centre over 7 years to 2010. (Research and Audit)1 to “energise” has increased signifi- Main outcome measures: Type of exposure; co-ingestants; symptoms cantly. Energy drinks were recently reported; and reported hospitalisations. 1 NSW Poisons Information shown to comprise 20% of the total Centre, The Children’s Results: Callers reported 297 exposures to energy drinks, which showed an Hospital at Westmead, convenience store beverage market, increasing annual trend from 12 in 2004 to 65 in 2010. Median age for the 217 Sydney, NSW. with “Red Bull” and “V” accounting subjects with recreational exposure was 17 years (interquartile ratio [IQR], 15–21; 2 Discipline of Emergency range, 11–60) and 57% were male. One hundred recreational users co-ingested Medicine, Sydney Medical for over 97% of sales in this multimil- 1 School, University of lion-dollar industry. Increasingly, other substances, predominantly alcohol (50) or other caffeinated products Sydney, Sydney, NSW. toxicity from caffeine overdose is (44). The number of energy drinks consumed in one session varied greatly (median, 5 units; IQR, 3–8; range, 1–80).
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Drinks and Health: a Brief Review of Their Effects and Consequences
    Ciencias de la Conducta ©2012 Universidad Carlos Albizu González, Miranda-Massari, Rodríguez-Gómez, Ricart y 2012. Vol. 27 – Núm. 1, 23-34 San Juan, Puerto Rico Rodríguez-Pagán Energy Drinks and Health: A Brief Review of Abstract their Effects and Consequences Energy drinks have been promoted as a healthy beverage within many subpopulations, as for instance, athletes and college students. The chemical Composition of energy drinks can produce multiple adverse effects, including serious behavioral ones. This article presents and Michael J. González1, Jorge R. Miranda-Massari2, José discusses, in a brief form, some serious health complications of energy Rodríguez Gómez3, Carlos M. Ricart4 y Dharma Rodriguez- drinks on their human consumers. Pagán51 Keywords: Energy drinks effects, athletes, college students Resumen Las bebidas energizantes tan comúnmente promovidas como saludables en múltiples escenarios y subpoblaciones como lo son atletas y estudiantes universitarios pueden tener serios efectos adversos debido a sus ingredientes. Su consumo puede llevar a sufrir serias complicaciones incluyendo efectos adversos en el comportamiento. Este Energy drinks became popular in Asia long before they reached artículo presenta y discute, en forma breve, algunas implicaciones serias the United States. In 1962, the Japanese pharmaceutical company, que pueden presentar estas bebidas, muy particularmente en términos de Taisho, released its Lipovitan D drink. It was designed to help salud. employees to work hard well into the night hours. An Austrian businessman, Dietrich Mateschitz picked up on the business potential of energy drinks while on a trip to Asia. Along with two Thai business Palabras Claves: Bebidas energizantes, atletas, estudiantes partners, Mateschitz started the company Red Bull GmbH, with the idea universitarios of marketing the drink to young Europeans.
    [Show full text]
  • Untitled-1 2 6/11/15 6:51 PM 41725 Inside Cover.Pdf 1 6/16/15 6:44 PM
    41725 Outside Cover.pdf 1 6/11/15 6:33 PM Untitled-1 2 6/11/15 6:51 PM 41725 Inside Cover.pdf 1 6/16/15 6:44 PM Table of Contents BOARD OF DIRECTORS & OFFICERS BOARD OF DIRECTORS & OFFICERS continued Letter to Stockholders....1 Rodney C. Sacks Mark S. Vidergauz Form 10-K....3 Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director, Report of Independent Registered Public Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer, The Sage Group, LLC Accounting Firm....73 Hilton H. Schlosberg Kathy N. Waller Consolidated Financial Statements....74 Vice Chairman of the Board, Director, Executive Vice President President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of The Coca-Cola Company Corporate Directory....113 Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Annual Meeting Registrar and Transfer Agent Mark J. Hall American Stock Transfer & Trust Company The annual meeting of stockholders will be held Director, Chief Marketing Officer, Brooklyn, New York Monster Energy Company at 1:00 pm on Friday, August 7, 2015 at Monster Beverage Corporation, Norman C. Epstein Independent Auditors 1 Monster Way, Corona, CA 92879 Director, Former Managing Director Deloitte & Touche LLP Cheval Property Finance, PLC Costa Mesa, California Gary P. Fayard General Counsel Director, Former Executive Vice President Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP and Chief Financial Officer of The Coca-Cola Company New York, New York Benjamin M. Polk Common Stock Director, Partner, Veritas Capital The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market system under Sydney Selati the symbol MNST Director, Former President and Chairman of the Board Form 10-K The Galore Group (U.S.A.), Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Report
    TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS 2012 represented our 20th consecutive record year of increased gross sales. Gross sales rose to $2.37 billion in 2012, from $1.95 billion in 2011. This achievement was primarily attributable to increased sales of our Monster Energy® drinks, both internationally and in the United States. In 2012, our Monster Rehab® line continued to make good progress and sales of this line more than doubled over 2011, when the line was launched. Additionally, in 2012 we launched what is arguably our most successful individual line extension ever, Monster Energy® Zero Ultra, in a 16 oz. white can that has a special unique textured ink finish, which has proved to be very successful and has received positive responses from consumers. During 2012, we continued to expand the distribution of our Monster Energy® drinks into a number of new international markets, the most notable of which was Japan, where sales exceeded our expectations. Additional positive news on the international front was the conclusion by us of a new distribution agreement in December with Ambev for distribution of Monster Energy® drinks in Brazil, which is the largest energy drink market in South America. Distribution with Ambev commenced at the end of January 2013. We are encouraged by early results achieved by Ambev. In 2012, gross sales outside of the United States increased to $513.9 million from $381.0 million in the prior year. Our Monster Energy® drinks are now sold in approximately 90 countries and territories. We are continuing with our plans to expand the sale of Monster Energy® drinks into additional countries internationally and are continuing to focus on introducing lower calorie drinks to meet increased demand from consumers for such products.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alcoholic Energy Drinks Issue
    Check out College Humor’s Honest Four Loko Commerical Volume 12 www.collegehumor.com Learn more about toxic drinking November 2010 www.redwatchband.org The Alcoholic Energy Drinks Issue What are alcoholic Did you know… Four What?! energy drinks? -Studies have shown The “four” in Four Loko that one can of Four • Alcoholic energy is derived from the Loko has the same alco- drinks (AEDs) are malt drink’s four key ingre- hol content as 5.64 stan- dients: caffeine, taurine, beverages that in addi- dard drinks. tion to alcohol contain guarana, and alcohol. a comparable amount -Drinkers who consume It is NOT shorthand for of caffeine to other en- alcohol with energy how many standard ergy drinks. drinks are twice as likely as those not mix- drinks are in one can. • These drinks also con- ing the two to report tain energy supple- being taken advantage ments, such as taurine of sexually, taking advantage of someone and guarana (which sexually, or getting into have never been a car with a driver who evaluated by the FDA) has been drinking • Most also contain car- -Drinkers who consume bonation, artificial alcohol with energy sweeteners, and exotic drinks are three times -sounding ingredients as likely to binge drink such as ginseng. -The FDA has just • These drinks can con- deemed that caffeine is an unsafe additive to tain 6%-12% alcohol alcoholic beverages by volume—more than and ordered its removal Aliases for Four Loko the standard American from all existing alco- beer (4% ABV) holic energy drinks. “Blockout in a can” “Liquid Cocaine” In the news..
    [Show full text]