DOCSLIB.ORG

V. Legalism/Legism (Fajia ) and Legalist/Legist Teachings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
V. Legalism/Legism (Fajia ) and Legalist/Legist Teachings V. LEGALISM/LEGISM (FAJIA ) AND LEGALIST/LEGIST TEACHINGS A. General Surveys and Collective Works standard works BODDE, Derk China’s First Unifier. A Study of the Ch’in Dynasty as seen in the life of Li Ssu (280?–208). Leiden 1938. BODDE, Derk “The state and empire of Ch’in.” CHC I pp. 21–102. CREEL, Herrlee G. “The Fa-chia—Legalists or Administrators?” In: Studies Presented to Tung Tso Pin on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology. Academia Sinica. Extra Volume 4 (1961) pp. 607–636. Rp in: id., “What Is Taoism?” pp. 92–120. HANSEN, Chad D. “Fa (Standards; Laws) and Meaning Changes in Chinese Philosophy.” PEW 44.3 (1994) pp. 435–488. LI Yu-ning [LI Youning] The First Emperor of China: The Politics of Histori- ography. New York 1975. RUBIN, Vitaly A. Individual and State in Ancient China: Essays on Four Phi- losophers. New York 1976. [from the Russian “Ideologiia yi kultura drev- nego kitaia” by von Steven I. LEVINE] VANDERMEERSCH, Leon La formation du légisme. Recherche sur la con- stitution d’une philosophie politique charactéristique de la Chine ancienne. Paris 1965. works indispensable for the specialist BODDE, Derk “Basic Concepts of Chinese Law: The Genesis and Evolution of Legal Thought in Traditional China.” In: Charles LE BLANC and Dor- othy BORER eds., Essays on Chinese Civilization. Princeton 1981. pp. 171–194. FU Zhengyuan China’s Legalists. The Earliest Totalitarians and Their Art of Ruling. Armonk 1996. New Studies in Asian Culture. HSIAO Kung-chuan “Legalism and Autocracy in Traditional China.” THJ NS 4.2 (1964) pp. 108–121. Rp in: CSH 10.1–2 (1976–1977) pp. 125–143 and in: LI Yu-ning ed., Shang Yang’s Reforms and State Control in China pp. 125–143. [from the Chinese] WANG Gungwu “‘Burning Books and Burying Scholars Alive’: Some Recent Interpretations concerning Ch’in Shih-huang.” Papers on Far East- ern History 9 (1974) pp. 137–186. works with additional information BODDE, Derk “A ‘Totalitarian’ Form of Government in Ancient China.” In: Far Eastern Leaflets 1–6. Washington 1942, pp. 23–25. 152 legalism/legism and legalist/legist teachings BODDE, Derk and Clarence MORRIS “Basic Concepts of Chinese Law.” In: James T. C. LIU and Wei-ming TU eds., Traditional China. Englewood Cliffs 1970. pp. 92–108. [from id., Law in Imperial China. Cambridge/Mass. 1967. pp. 3–29; without the footnotes] CHENG Chung-ying “Legalism versus Confucianism: A Philosophical Appraisal.” JCP 8.3 (1981) pp. 271–302. Rev. ed. in: id., New Dimensions pp. 311–338. CHENG Yung [ZHENG Yong], YEN Yen [YAN Yan] et al. “A Tentative Dis- cussion of Legalist Military Thought during the Warring States Period.” CSP 7.3 (1976) pp. 40–56. [from the Chinese] CHUNG Cheh “Chin Shih Huang and the struggle between the Confucians and the Legalists.” China Reconstructs 24.9 (1975) pp. 8–11. CREEL, Herrlee G. “The Meaning of Hsing-ming.” In: Sören EGERÖD and Else GLAHN eds., Studia Serica Bernhard Karlgren Dedi- cata. Kopenhagen 1959. pp. 199–211. Rp in: id., What Is Taoism? pp. 79– 91. FELBER, Roland “Zur Interpretation des Legismus in der VR China 1972– 1975.” In: Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von M. J. SLADKOVSKIJ. Berlin-Ost 1976. pp. 38–52. FIELDS, Lanny B. “The Legalists and the Fall of Ch’in: Humanism and Tyr- anny.” JAH 17 (1983) pp. 1–39. HSIEH, Shan-yuan “The Legalist Philosophers.” In: Donald H. BISHOP ed., Chinese Thought pp. 81–109. HULSEWÉ, Anthony F. P. “The Legalists and the Laws of Ch’in.” In: Wilt L. IDEMA ed., Leyden Studies in Sinology. Leiden 1981. pp. 1–22. HUNG Cheng [HONG Cheng] “A Tentative Discussion of Pre-Ch’in Legalists’ Ideas Concerning War Preparedness.” CSH 9.2 (1975–1976) pp. 21–36. JAN Yün-hua “Taoist Silk Manuscripts and Early Legalist Thought.” In: Julia CHING and Richard W. L. GUISSO eds., Sages and Filial Sons pp. 65–79. [main focus on SHEN Buhai, Shangjun shu and SHEN Dao] KUDO Motoo “The Ch’in Bamboo Strip Book of Divination (Jih- shu) and Ch’in Legalism.” AA 58 (1990) pp. 24–37. KUNG, Charles C. “The Legalist School and Shi Huang Ti.” In: CC 4.3 (1962) p. 107–114. LAU, Ulrich. Vom Schaf zur Gerechtigkeit—Der sakrale Hintergrund einiger frühchinesischer Rechtstermini. In: Christiane HAMMER und Bernhard FÜHRER eds., Tradition und Moderne pp. 37–47. LEANG K’i-ch’ao [LIANG Qichao] La conception de la loi et les théories des légistes à la veille des Ts’in. Traduction, introduction et notes par Jean Escarra et Robert Germain. Peking 1926. [from the Chinese (Yinbingshi wenji ) by Jean ESCARRA and Robert GERMAIN] LEE Kwang Kyu “The Legalist School and Legal Positivism.” JCP 3.1 (1975– 1976) pp. 23–56. LÉVI, Jean “Solidarité de l’ordre de la nature et de l’ordre de la societé: ‘loi’ naturelle et ‘loi’ sociale dans la pensée légiste de la Chine ancienne.” EOEO 3 (1983) pp. 23–36. LÉVI, Jean “Qin Shi Huang Di und die Staatsdoktrin von Shang Yang und Han Fei.” In: Dokumentation - China -Akademie - Herbst 1990. Dortmund 1991. pp. 103–119..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Qing Æ…–In the Huainanziâ•Žs Ethics
    Susquehanna University Scholarly Commons Religious Studies Faculty Publications 9-2015 The Role of Qing 情in the Huainanzi’s Ethics Matthew L. Duperon Susquehanna University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.susqu.edu/reli_fac_pubs Part of the Chinese Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Duperon, Matthew L., "The Role of Qing 情in the Huainanzi’s Ethics" (2015). Religious Studies Faculty Publications. Paper 1. http://scholarlycommons.susqu.edu/reli_fac_pubs/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Role of Qing 情 in the Huainanzi’s Ethics Matthew Duperon Susquehanna University The second-century BCE text Huainanzi purports to be an exhaustive compendium of all knowledge needed to successfully govern a vast, diverse empire like the one administrated by the early Han dynasty. As such, it addresses topics from a range of theoretical and applied fields like military theory, politics and the administration of government, economics, geography, ritual practice, and much more, all within the metaphysical framework of correlative cosmology in vogue at the time. In developing an overall program for how the Han empire should be administered, the Huainanzi authors take normative stances on these issues, and the text consequently includes a great deal of ethical content. The authors’ syncretic vision based in correlative cosmology provides the meta-ethical foundation upon which they build this ethical program. Thus, their program of ethical self-cultivation—how humans can move from a state of imperfection toward one of sagely perfection—partakes of the same theoretical framework that shapes the argument of the text as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Han Fei and the Han Feizi
    Introduction: Han Fei and the Han Feizi Paul R. Goldin Han Fei 韓非 was the name of a proli fi c Chinese philosopher who (according to the scanty records available to us) was executed on trumped up charges in 233 B.C.E. Han Feizi 韓非子, meaning Master Han Fei , is the name of the book purported to contain his writings. In this volume, we distinguish rigorously between Han Fei (the man) and Han Feizi (the book) for two main reasons. First, the authenticity of the Han Feizi —or at least of parts of it—has long been doubted (the best studies remain Lundahl 1992 and Zheng Liangshu 1993 ) . This issue will be revisited below; for now, suffi ce to it to say that although the contributors to this volume accept the bulk of it as genuine, one cannot simply assume that Han Fei was the author of everything in the Han Feizi . Indeed, there is a memorial explic- itly attributed to Han Fei’s rival Li Si 李斯 (ca. 280–208 B.C.E.) in the pages of the Han Feizi ( Chen Qiyou 陳奇猷 2000 : 1.2.42–47); some scholars fear that other material in the text might also be the work of people other than Han Fei. Second, and no less importantly, even if Han Fei is responsible for the lion’s share of the extant Han Feizi , a reader must be careful not to identify the philosophy of Han Fei himself with the philosophy (or philosophies) advanced in the Han Feizi , as though these were necessarily the same thing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideology and Significance of the Legalists School and the School Of
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 351 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019) The Ideology and Significance of the Legalists School and the School of Diplomacy in the Warring States Period Chen Xirui The Affiliated High School to Hangzhou Normal University [email protected] Keywords: Warring States Period; Legalists; Strategists; Modern Economic and Political Activities Abstract: In the Warring States Period, the legalist theory was popular, and the style of reforming the country was permeated in the land of China. The Seven Warring States known as Qin, Qi, Chu, Yan, Han, Wei and Zhao have successively changed their laws and set the foundation for the country. The national strength hovers between the valley and school’s doctrines have accelerated the historical process of the Great Unification. The legalists laid a political foundation for the big country, constructed a power framework and formulated a complete policy. On the rule of law, the strategist further opened the gap between the powers of the country. In other words, the rule of law has created conditions for the cross-border family to seek the country and the activity of the latter has intensified the pursuit of the former. This has sparked the civilization to have a depth and breadth thinking of that period, where the need of ideology and research are crucial and necessary. This article will specifically address the background of the legalists, the background of these two generations, their historical facts and major achievements as well as the research into the practical theory that was studies during that period.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Shen Dao
    慎到 A STUDY OF SHEN DAO John Emerson Copyright 2012 John Emerson [email protected] SHEN DAO: MYSTIC AND BUREAUCRAT I Shen Dao was a member of the Jixia Academy in Qi during the Hundred Schools era, sometime between 350 BC and 275 BC. Xunzi criticized him, Xunzi’s student Han Feizi acknowledged him as one of three masters of Legalism (along with Shang Yang and Shen Buhai), and the author of the Tianxia chapter of Zhuangzi discussed him at some length. Details about his life are scanty and uncertain, but at least we can be sure that he existed and was not purely legendary. The Hundred Schools era was perhaps the most fertile period in the history of Chinese philosophy, but because of censorship and the destruction of war, few of its texts survive, usually in heavily-edited late versions, and many figures are known only as names attached to anecdotes. In the case of Shen Dao, the available material consists of a late text called the Shenzi, the three discussions mentioned above, and scattered quotations and anecdotes of widely differing value. Thompson has carefully edited the materials that remain and I have used his text. Shen Dao is classified sometimes as a Daoist, sometimes as a Legalist, and sometimes as a follower of Huanglao, but these late retrospective classifications are not very helpful. There were no organized Daoist, Legalist, or Huanglao schools comparable to the Mohist and Confucian schools, and in effect, these classifications merely serve to lump tendencies. Insofar as these three labels mean anything, they are probably all applicable to Shen Dao.1 Given the decimation of the sources, it’s hard to discuss the history of Chinese philosophy during that era without the help of speculative assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shenzi Fragments
    The Shenzi Fragments A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS AND TRANSLATION Eirik Lang Harris Th e Shenzi Fragments TRANSLATIONS FROM THE ASIAN CLASSICS C7004.indb i 7/13/16 9:33 AM TRANSLATIONS FROM THE ASIAN CLASSICS Editorial Board Wm. Th eodore de Bary, Chair Paul Anderer Donald Keene George A. Saliba Haruo Shirane Burton Watson Wei Shang C7004.indb ii 7/13/16 9:33 AM Th e Shenzi Fragments A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS AND TRANSLATION Eirik Lang Harris Columbia University Press New York C7004.indb iii 7/13/16 9:33 AM Columbia University Press wishes to express its appreciation for funding support given by the Tang Center for Early China in the publication of this book. Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex cup.columbia.edu Copyright © 2016 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Harris, Eirik Lang, author. | Shen, Dao, approximately 350 B.C.–approximately 275 B.C. Shenzi. English. Title: Th e Shenzi Fragments : a philosophical analysis and translation | Eirik Lang Harris. Other titles: Philosophical analysis and translation of the Shenzi Description: New York : Columbia University Press, 2016. | Series: Translations from the Asian classics | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. Identifi ers: LCCN 2015049110 (print) | LCCN 2015046861 (ebook) | ISBN 9780231542166 (electronic) | ISBN 9780231177665 (cloth : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Shen, Dao, approximately 350 B.C.– approximately 275 B.C. Shenzi. Classifi cation: LCC B128.S543 (print) | LCC B128.S543 S5434 2016 (ebook) | DDC 181/.11 —dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2015049110 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • TAOISM and CONFUCIANISM (Through the Han Dynasty) Russell
    TAOISM AND CONFUCIANISM (through the Han Dynasty) Russell Kirkland For: Encyclopedia of Taoism The relationship of early Confucianism and Taoism was more complex than many modern minds imagine. Looking back through 2000 years, with lenses shaped by modern Confucian and Western biases, we have commonly assumed that Taoism arose mainly as a reaction against Confucianism. Indeed, many writers have simplistically presented Confucianism and Taoism in a dualistic caricature. A more realistic appraisal requires careful analysis of the social, cultural and political realities of early China. Modern assumptions that Confucianism was founded by Confucius and Taoism by "Lao- tzu" are in error. Confucius, for his part, maintained that his ideals were not his own formula- tions, but only a restatement of the values bequeathed by the wise and virtuous men of earlier eras. There is some reason to believe that certain behaviorial ideals, stressing honor and propri- ety, had in fact been cherished, and at least sometimes practiced, by members of the ruling clans of the various statelets of Confucius' day. But those ideals of noblesse oblige were trans- formed by Confucius from a social ideal, requiring aristocratic status, into a moral ideal that any conscientious man should develop and practice. Yet all Confucians considered social responsi- bility a primary concern. Even the more "cosmic" or "mystical" dimensions of classical Confu- cianism C e.g., in the Zhongyong C retain a social focus, insisting that the ultimate reason for a person to cultivate Confucian ideals is to lead a socio-political transformation. Despite the dis- parities between other proponents of classical Confucianism, such as Mencius (Mengzi) and Hsün-tzu (Xunzi), their core concerns were resolutely humanistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Selections from Mencius, Books I and II: Mencius's Travels Persuading
    MENCIUS Translation, Commentary, and Notes Robert Eno May 2016 Version 1.0 © 2016 Robert Eno This online translation is made freely available for use in not for profit educational settings and for personal use. For other purposes, apart from fair use, copyright is not waived. Open access to this translation, without charge, is provided at: http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23423 Also available as open access translations of the Four Books The Analects of Confucius: An Online Teaching Translation http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23420 Mencius: An Online Teaching Translation http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23421 The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean: An Online Teaching Translation http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23422 The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean: Translation, Notes, and Commentary http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23424 Cover illustration Mengzi zhushu jiejing 孟子註疏解經, passage 2A.6, Ming period woodblock edition CONTENTS Prefatory Note …………………………………………………………………………. ii Introduction …………………………………………………………………………….. 1 TEXT Book 1A ………………………………………………………………………………… 17 Book 1B ………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Book 2A ………………………………………………………………………………… 41 Book 2B ………………………………………………………………………………… 53 Book 3A ………………………………………………………………………………… 63 Book 3B ………………………………………………………………………………… 73 Book 4A ………………………………………………………………………………… 82 Book 4B ………………………………………………………………………………… 92 Book 5A ………………………………………………………………………………... 102 Book 5B ………………………………………………………………………………... 112 Book 6A ……………………………………………………………………………….. 121 Book 6B ……………………………………………………………………………….. 131 Book
    [Show full text]
  • Persistent Misconceptions About Chinese “Legalism” Paul R
    Persistent Misconceptions about Chinese “Legalism” Paul R. Goldin The reasons for avoiding the term “legalism” in the study of classical Chinese philosophy were summarized years ago by Herrlee G. Creel, 1 and most scholars would probably agree, if pressed, that the term is flawed, and yet one continues to find it deployed in published books and articles—almost as though no one is prepared to admit that it has to be abandoned. 2 I believe that “legalism” is virtually useless as a hermeneutic lens; indeed, in many contexts it obscures more than it clarifies. Even as a bibliographical category, as it was frequently used in imperial times, its value is questionable. In the following pages, I shall first review the weaknesses of the term “legalism,” then ask why scholars persist in adopting it even though they can hardly be unaware of its defects, and finally suggest a better approach to the material that is conventionally categorized as “legalist.” * * * “Legalism” is an imprecise Sinological translation of the Chinese term fajia 法家 . 1 “The fa-chia : ‘Legalists’ or ‘Administrators’?” (1961), reprinted in Creel’s What Is Taoism? and Other Studies in Chinese Cultural History (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970), 92-120. It should be noted that in his earlier publications, such as Chinese Thought from Confucius to Mao Tse-tung (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953), Creel seemed comfortable with the term. 2 Lest readers suppose that I am arguing against a straw man, consider the following titles, published just since 2000, using the term “Legalism” (or some cognate): Roger Boesche, “Han Feizi’s Legalism versus Kautilya’s Arthashastra ,” Asian Philosophy 15.2 (2005), 157-72; idem , “Kautilya’s Arthashastra and the Legalism of Lord Shang,” Journal of Asian History 42.1 (2008), 64-90; Hans van Ess, “Éducation classique, éducation légiste sous les Han,” in Education et instruction en Chine , ed.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Hanfei's Political Philosophy
    An Introduction to Hanfei’s Political Philosophy An Introduction to Hanfei’s Political Philosophy: The Way of the Ruler By Henrique Schneider An Introduction to Hanfei’s Political Philosophy: The Way of the Ruler By Henrique Schneider This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Henrique Schneider All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0812-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0812-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ....................................................................................................... vii Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Introduction – Hanfei, Legalism, Chinese Philosophy Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 27 Methodology – Reading Hanfei as a “Social Scientist”? Chapter Three ............................................................................................ 43 History – If Unimportant, Why Look at the Past? Chapter Four .............................................................................................. 65
    [Show full text]
  • Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, "Legalism," "Et Cetera" Author(S): Kidder Smith and Sima Tan Source: the Journal of Asian Studies, Vol
    Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, "Legalism," "et cetera" Author(s): Kidder Smith and Sima Tan Source: The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 62, No. 1 (Feb., 2003), pp. 129-156 Published by: Association for Asian Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3096138 Accessed: 06-01-2016 12:20 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Asian Studies and Cambridge University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Asian Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.113.0.105 on Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:20:29 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, "Legalism,"et cetera KIDDER SMITH H ERE'S A SHORT VERSION: The "-ism" we invoke when we posit things like "Daoism" was glimpsed for the first time by Sima Tan-J,J--, a(d. 110 B.C.E.), lord grand astrologer (taishigongJ; _j_) to the Han court. His essay "Yaozhi"g^ (Essential points), included in the final chapter of his son Sima Qian's Taishigong,' analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of six approaches to governance: Yinyang =%|, Ru f (known to us as Confucians), Mo , (the Mohists), Fajia ~j * (called Legalists), Mingjia ; V (called Sophists), and Daojia I * (or Daode X {f , the supposed Daoists).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Sage-King Narratives: Idealized Concepts of Rulership in Warring States Chinese Thought
    DEVELOPMENT OF THE SAGE-KING NARRATIVES: IDEALIZED CONCEPTS OF RULERSHIP IN WARRING STATES CHINESE THOUGHT by CHUNG KUANG ALLEN CHEN B.A., The University of British Columbia, 2009 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Asian Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2012 © Chung Kuang Allen Chen, 2012 Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to investigate how contemporary scholarship interpreted sage-kings (聖王) narratives, commonly used in Warring States and Chinese philosophical texts to represent particular visions of ideal rulership, in their understanding of the historical and political contexts of the development of early Chinese intellectual history. Another aim is to find out how these narratives changed over time, and how they revealed the different political concerns of the Warring States philosophers. This project uses a primarily historiographical approach and first surveyed the works of leading scholarship in the field that discusses the use of the sage-kings. Then, two particular narratives are examined in order to demonstrate their evolution over time. The first of these sage-king narratives was on the taming of the great flood by Yu 禹 and the rise of human civilization; the second was on the abdication of Yao 堯 to Shun 舜 and the issue of legitimacy in the transfer of political authority. The results of the study shows that even though contemporary scholarship recognizes the importance of the sage-king narratives in understanding political concerns in the history of early China, and the evolution of these narratives over time, there is no consensus in the methodology best used to systematically integrate them.
    [Show full text]
  • Xunzi and Han Fei on Human Nature
    Xunzi and Han Fei on Human Nature Alejandro Bárcenas ABSTRACT: It is commonly accepted that Han Fei studied under Xunzi sometime during the late third century BCE. However, there is surprisingly little dedicated to the in-depth study of the relationship between Xunzi’s ideas and one of his best-known followers. In this essay I argue that Han Fei’s notion of xing, commonly translated as human nature, was not only influenced by Xunzi but also that it is an important feature of his political philosophy. “Aus so krummem Holze, als woraus der Mensch gemacht ist, kann nichts ganz Gerades gezimmert werden.” —Immanuel Kant, Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. T FIRST SIGHT, IT DOES not seem far-fetched to suggest that a thorough Astudy of Han Fei’s notion of xing (性)—commonly translated as human na- ture—should include an analysis of the role played by his teacher Xunzi. However, suggesting the existence of such influence has proven to be a quite controversial topic. For the most part recent interpreters of the history of Chinese philosophy tend to briefly mention the existence of some sort of philosophical relationship between Xunzi and Han Fei.1 What scholars generally acknowledge is that a master-student relationship existed between the two, which typically indicates some kind of influ- ence (or rejection) of one by the other. However, there is surprisingly little dedicated to the in-depth study of the relationship between Xunzi’s ideas and one of his best- known followers. This absence of detailed analysis is even more puzzling when it is contrasted with the profuse amount of research during recent years, dedicated to comparing Xunzi with Mencius, his most famous counterpart.2 In the following 1See, Geng Wu, Die Staatslehre des Han Fei: ein Beitrag zur chinesischen Idee der Staatsräson (Vienna: Springer, 1978) p.
    [Show full text]