Papers of the British School at Rome the Historical

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Papers of the British School at Rome the Historical Papers of the British School at Rome http://journals.cambridge.org/ROM Additional services for Papers of the British School at Rome: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The Historical Interpretation of the Reliefs of Trajan's Column H. Stuart Jones Papers of the British School at Rome / Volume 5 / January 1910, pp 434 - 459 DOI: 10.1017/S0068246200005353, Published online: 09 August 2013 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0068246200005353 How to cite this article: H. Stuart Jones (1910). The Historical Interpretation of the Reliefs of Trajan's Column. Papers of the British School at Rome, 5, pp 434-459 doi:10.1017/S0068246200005353 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/ROM, IP address: 169.230.243.252 on 03 Apr 2015 PAPERS OF THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME VOL. V. No. 7 THE HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE RELIEFS OF TRAJAN'S COLUMN BY H. STUART JONES, M.A. Formerly Director of the British School af Rome; Member of the German Imperial Archaeological Institute LONDON: 1910 F F THE HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE RELIEFS OF TRAJAN'S COLUMN. THE object of this paper is neither to discuss the artistic significance of the reliefs which adorn the Column of Trajan, nor to solve the problem raised by the inscription on its base, but solely to treat the sculptures as embodying an historical narrative in stone, and to present certain conclusions differing from those of earlier interpreters. These conclusions were originally formed during my residence in Rome as Director of the British school; they were first tentatively expressed at a meeting of the School held on April 4, 1906 (when I had ceased to hold the office of Director) and developed with greater detail in a paper read before the Oxford Philological Society on March 15, 1907 (see Class. Rev. 1907, p. 125) and finally in a communication made to the International Historical Con- gress at Berlin on August 8, 1908. It is unnecessary to say that the great publication of Cichorius1 (and the incisive criticisms of that work by Petersen2) have brought the question here to be discussed into the fore- ground of archaeological debate ; the views since put forward by von Domas- zewski3 and Weber4 appear to me (as will presently be shewn) to betoken a retrogression in the direction of theories which should have been recog- nised as put definitely out of court by the researches of Cichorius and Petersen. 'No attempt has been made in this paper to enter into full topo- graphical detail, except where such is essential to the argument. I have not had an opportunity of visiting the scenes of Trajan's campaigns, and 1 Die Keliefs dcr Trajayissciule, 1896-1 goo. 2 Trajans dakischc Kriege nach dem Saulenrelief erzahlt, 1899-1903 (two vols., referred to below as ' Petersen i and ii'). 3 Philologus, 1906, pp. 321 ff. 4 Untersuchungen zur Geschichie des Kaisers Haariamts, pp. 18 f. F F 2 436 THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME. without such personal inspection of the sites an adequate commentary on the reliefs cannot be written. We may assume at the outset that the designer of the reliefs was an innovator, seeking for a means of expression under fresh material conditions aud obliged to create new conventions with this end in view. The history of the spiral column in ancient architecture has been traced by M. Victor Chapot,1 but he has not been able to furnish any example of such decoration as we here see applied to a helicoid surface. But in the reign of Trajan the time was ripe for such an experiment. Whatever the merits of Roman art, it must be conceded that it had the defect of overloading the field of decoration with ornament. The function of the artist was to tell with the least possible omission the story of the Imperial triumphs (whether in peace or war) which he was called to celebrate ; and since the Flavian period the restraining influence of the classical Hellenic standards was growing weaker. A comparison of the Arch of Trajan at Beneventum with that of Titus at Rome will do more than any words to make this point clear. Nor can we be surprised that the spiral column seemed to afford too good an opportunity for the perpetuation of Trajan's military exploits to be lost. Thus it is not necessary to search for models in the earlier history of sculpture or painting, nor to appeal to the remoter analogies of the book-roll or the cncvTaKrj. The style thus brought into being is commonly known—after Wickhoff —as 'continuous.' This term is not altogether well chosen. If it expresses more than the bare fact that a continuous band of relief is here used to depict a connected narrative, it must imply that there is an unbroken background upon which the events unfold themselves ; and this is very far from being true. To the historian the breaks and pauses in the narrative revealed by attentive study are of the first importance; and it is essential to the right understanding of the monument that we should distinguish three modes by which the artist unfolds his story : (a) The episodic, successive, or isolating style, where we have a series of incidents clearly marked off as individual scenes : of this the most obvious examples are to be found at the beginning of the several campaigns, where the Allocutio, the Lustratio exercitus, and the council of war are successively shewn, or again in the disconnected episodes which follow the great crisis of the action, such as the Allocutio (Cich. xlii.), the interment of 1 La colonne torse et le dtcor en hilice dans I'art antique, Paris, 1907. INTERPRETATION OF THE RELIEFS OF TRAJAN'S COLUMN. 437 the Dacian chiefs (Cich. xliii.), the distribution of the dona militaria (Cich. xliv.), and the torture of Roman prisoners (Cich. xlv.) : (6) The continuous style, properly so called, where the march of events proceeds in the foreground without abrupt transitions (the back- ground being represented as continuous) in such a manner that the spectator is carried on through a series of scenes adroitly linked together to the climax of the narrative : the journey of Trajan at the outset of the second war is the classical example of this : (c) The panoramic style—a bold experiment, in which the artist, assuming in the spectator some acquaintance with the subject-matter of the narrative and also with the principles of symmetrical composition, inherited from Greek art, unfolds in a comprehensive picture a series of events or moments not in reality contemporaneous; it will be shewn that we have a striking instance of this procedure in the Second War. A careful study of the reliefs leads to the conclusion that the designer became only gradually aware of the potentialities inherent in the style which he was creating, and that in the treatment of the Second War he attained greater freedom of composition and ventured on bolder and more successful experiments than in the earlier stacje of his work. It will not be amiss here to give a very brief resume of the story as he tells it; marking the changes of method. The numbering of scenes follows that of Cichorius, but is adopted solely for convenience of reference, since (as Petersen pointed out) the divisions are often arbitrary. Where the artist has not clearly indicated a break in the narrative by such conventional signs as a tree, a change of direction, or a repetition of the principal figures, subdivision is perilous and often misleading. I.—FIRST WAR (A.D. 101-2). (a) First Campaign (A.D. 102). § 1. Introductory (i.-iii.). The Danube frontier line. § 2. Crossing of the river (iv., v.). § 3. Advance and clearing of route (vi.-xx.) ; episodic. § 4. Final advance and engagement (xxi.-xxiv.) ; continuous. § 5. Later operations (xxv.-xxx.); episodic. 438 THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME. (b) Winter Campaign (A.D. 102-3). § 1. Dacians take the offensive (xxxi., xxxii.). § 2. Trajan proceeds to the scene of action and drives off the raiders (xxxiii.-xxxvii.); continuous. § 3. Operations in Lower Moesia (including battle-scene) and return of Trajan (xxxviii.-xlvii.). (c) Second Campaign (A.D. 103). § 1. Crossing of the Danube (xlviii.). § 2. Advance by fresh route and storm of Dacian positions (xlix.-lxxiii); mainly episodic. § 3. Fall of Sarmizegetusa and submission of Decebalus (lxxiv.-lxxvi.); panoramic. § 4. Final allocutio (lxxvii.). II.—SECOND WAR (A.D. 105-6). {a) First Campaign (A.D. 105). § 1. Journey of Trajan to Moesia (lxxix.-xc.); continuous. § 2. Sacrifice at Six Altars (xci.). § 3. Relief of Roman garrisons (xcii.-xcviii) ; panoramic. (b) Operations Suspended {Winter, A.D. 105-6). § I. Trajan at Pontes (xcix.). § 2. Trajan at Drobetae (a). (c) Second Campaign (A.D. 106). § I. Preliminary scenes (ci.-cv.); episodic. § 2. Advance in two columns (cvi.-cx.) ; continuous. § 3. Dacians' alarm ; first contact of the armies (cxi., cxii.). § 4. Siege of Sarmizegetusa (cxiii.-cxviii.) ; continuous. § 5. Fall of Sarmize^etusa (cxix.—cxxii.) ; panoramic. § 6. War in the mountains (cxxiii.-end); mainly episodic (some scenes treated in the continuous manner). In translating the narrative whose outlines have been thus traced from picture-language into that of prose history, it is to be assumed that the INTERPRETATION OF THE RELIEFS OF TRAJAN'S COLUMN. 439 designer endeavoured to make his record of fact as plain and as straight- forward as the conditions of his art allowed. Sometimes, it is true, especially in the great panoramic chapter which relates the story of the timely relief given by Trajan to his hard-pressed garrisons in A.D.
Recommended publications
  • Recreating Viminacium in 3D and Presenting Roman Cultural Heritage
    Golubović and Mrđić - Rebirth of the Past...(155-167) Archaeology and Science 13 (2017) SNEŽANA GOLUBOVIć, 904:725.182]:004.92”652”(497.11) Institute of Archaeology 930.85(497.11:100) Belgrade, Serbia COBISS.SR-ID 264134156 [email protected] Original research article NEMANJA MRĐIć, Received: April 06th 2018 Institute of Archaeology Accepted: April 30th 2018 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] reBIRTH oF tHe Past – reCREATInG VIMInaCIuM In 3d and PRESENTING ROMAN CULTURAL HERITAGE ABSTRACT Recreating invisible or highly damaged archaeological remains in 3D technologies has become one of the best ways to bring the past to regular visitors. The Project ARCHEST was designed to improve the presentation of the site and to, consequently, attract new visitors. The main objectives were support- ing the archaeology-related creative sectors to operate transnationally and to increase the knowledge of common Roman history through the most important archaeological sites. Additionally, there was an objective to increase the audience with an integrated approach and modern technology, transforming a non-audience into a new audience and changing the opinion that archaeology is something boring or too elitist. The results of the project have a huge appeal to ordinary audiences and support a better understanding and acceptance of Roman civilization through clear images which, at the same time, do not contradict the scientific concept but, rather, aim to support it. keyWords: 3d reConstruCtIon, VIRTUAL reaLIty, VIMInaCIuM, arCHest. INTRODUCTION museums are not scientists and are not able to un- derstand remains in the same way as profession- A visualisation of the past is one of the most als.
    [Show full text]
  • Archäologie Und Politik
    1 CHRISTIAN WITSCHEL Römische Außenpolitik Kaiser Trajan, die Dakerkriege und die Donauprovinzen Politica externă romană Împăratul Traian, războaiele dacice și provinciile dunărene Roman Foreign Policy Emperor Trajan, the Dacian Wars and the Danube Provinces 28 CHRISTIAN WITSCHEL Im Zentrum dieses Bandes steht ein În centrul acestui volum se află un At the centre of this volume stands an imposantes Monument, das der römi- monument impunător, înălțat de imposing monument built by the Roman sche Kaiser Trajan (reg. 98–117 n. Chr.) împăratul roman Traian (domnie: emperor Trajan (r. 98–117 CE) to com- zur Erinnerung an seine Siege über 98–117 d. Hr.) pentru a comemora vic- memorate his victories over the Dacian das Volk der Daker errichten ließ: das toriile sale asupra poporului dacilor: people: The Tro paeum Traiani at Adam- Tro paeum Traiani bei Adam klissi [4]. Tro paeum Traiani, de la Adam clisi [4]. clisi [4]. It is located south of the Danube, Es befindet sich südlich der Donau, Acesta este situat la sud de Dunăre, în in the Dobruja landscape in southeast in der Landschaft Dobrudscha ganz peisajul Dobrogei, în sud-estul Româ- Romania. Given the location of the Tro- im Süd osten des heutigen Rumänien. niei de astăzi. Având în vedere locația paeum, one question immediately arises: Angesichts des Standortes des Tro- monumentului, survine nemijlocit între- Why was it not built in the heartland of paeum stellt sich unmittelbar eine barea: de ce nu a fost edificat în inte- the Dacian Empire conquered by Trajan, Frage: Warum wurde dieses nicht im riorul Regatului Dac, cucerit de Traian, i.
    [Show full text]
  • Domitian's Dacian War Domitian'in Daçya Savaşi
    2020, Yıl 4, Sayı 13, 75 - 102 DOMITIAN’S DACIAN WAR DOMITIAN’IN DAÇYA SAVAŞI DOI: 10.33404/anasay.714329 Çalışma Türü: Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article1 Gökhan TEKİR* ABSTRACT Domitian, who was one of the most vilified Roman emperors, had suf- fered damnatio memoriae by the senate after his assassination in 96. Senator historians Tacitus and Cassius Dio ignored and criticized many of Domitian’s accomplishments, including the Dacian campaign. Despite initial setbacks in 86 and 87, Domitian managed to push the invading Dacians into the Dacian terri- tory and even approached to the Dacian capital in 88. However, the Saturninus revolt and instability in the Chatti and Pannonia in 89 prevented Domitian from concluding the campaign. The peace treaty stopped the Dacian incursions and made Dacia a dependent state. It is consistent with Domitian’s non-expansionist imperial policy. This peace treaty stabilized a hostile area and turned Dacia a client kingdom. After dealing with various threats, he strengthened the auxiliary forces in Dacia, stabilizing the Dacian frontier. Domitian’s these new endeavors opened the way of the area’s total subjugation by Trajan in 106. Keywords: Domitian, Roman Empire, Dacia, Decebalus, security 1- Makale Geliş Tarihi: 03. 04. 2020 Makale Kabül Tarihi: 15. 08. 2020 * Doktor, Email: [email protected] ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7442 75 DomItIan’s DacIan War ÖZ Domitian 96 yılında düzenlenen suikast sonucunda hakkında senato tarafından ‘hatırası lanetlenen’ ve hakkında en çok karalama yapılan Roma imparatorlarından birisidir. Senatör tarihçilerden olan Tacitus ve Cassius Dio, Domitian’ın bir çok başarısını görmezden gelmiş ve eleştirmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 1 Institute of Archaeology Belgrade, Serbia 24. LIMES CONGRESS Serbia 02-09 September 2018 Belgrade - Viminacium BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Belgrade 2018 PUBLISHER Institute of Archaeology Kneza Mihaila 35/IV 11000 Belgrade http://www.ai.ac.rs [email protected] Tel. +381 11 2637-191 EDITOR IN CHIEF Miomir Korać Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade EDITORS Snežana Golubović Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade Nemanja Mrđić Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade GRAPHIC DESIGN Nemanja Mrđić PRINTED BY DigitalArt Beograd PRINTED IN 500 copies ISBN 979-86-6439-039-2 4 CONGRESS COMMITTEES Scientific committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology Miroslav Vujović, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology Stefan Pop-Lazić, Institute of Archaeology Gordana Jeremić, Institute of Archaeology Nemanja Mrđić, Institute of Archaeology International Advisory Committee David Breeze, Durham University, Historic Scotland Rebecca Jones, Historic Environment Scotland Andreas Thiel, Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Esslingen Nigel Mills, Heritage Consultant, Interpretation, Strategic Planning, Sustainable Development Sebastian Sommer, Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege Lydmil Vagalinski, National Archaeological Institute with Museum – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Mirjana Sanader, Odsjek za arheologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Organization committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology
    [Show full text]
  • The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora
    THE REMAKING OF THE DACIAN IDENTITY IN ROMANIA AND THE ROMANIAN DIASPORA By Lucian Rosca A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Sociology Committee: ___________________________________________ Director ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Department Chairperson ___________________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: _____________________________________ Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University, Fairfax, VA The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at George Mason University By Lucian I. Rosca Bachelor of Arts George Mason University, 2015 Director: Patricia Masters, Professor Department of Sociology Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis coordinators: Professor Patricia Masters, Professor Dae Young Kim, Professor Lester Kurtz, and my wife Paula, who were of invaluable help. Fi- nally, thanks go out to the Fenwick Library for providing a clean, quiet, and well- equipped repository in which to work. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoth Park at Viminacium, Serbia Building Type: Archaeological Park / Paleontology Museum
    Case Study Project: Mammoth Park at Viminacium, Serbia Building Type: Archaeological Park / Paleontology Museum Mammoth Park, part of the Viminacium Archaeological Park near Kostolac in Eastern Serbia, opened in June 2014, and is now an exquisite tourist destination. The park is situated in an underground cave where visitors can see exposed skeletons of a female mammoth, Vike, found in 2009, as well as the remains of her four young relatives. After a million years spent beneath the Drmno mine, the Viminacium mammoths (the oldest residents of the EU continent), are now on display to the public in a layer of sand in which they were discovered. Objective The Mammoth was found 270 meters east of the Imperial Mausoleum, at a depth of 27 meters and subsequently moved to Viminacium in April 2014. The Institute for Nature Conservation issued the official criteria by which to carry out the delicate move of the skeletons. Experts at the Natural History Museum in Belgrade carried out the restoration and conservation of the Mammoth, followed by the construction of a protective structure allowing visitor accessibility, 5.8 meters below ground. Cooperation with the Institute of Archaeology required proper lightning without damaging UV exposure for the mammoth skeleton and proper air flow of the underground space. Solution To meet their goals, Kerber presented a solution with Solatube® Daylighting Systems to help achieve enough natural light with minimal thermal impact to the underground cave of 1300 m² (32.5 m x 40 m); thereby creating the best possible environment for visitors and employees. Furthermore, Solatube Daylighting Systems eliminate the damaging effects of UV radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Result of the Historic Evolution and Contemporary Urban Planning Tool
    ROMANIAN REVIEW OF REGIONAL STUDIES, Volume XII, Number 1, 2016 BUILT HERITAGE IN THE LAND OF HAȚEG – RESULT OF THE HISTORIC EVOLUTION AND CONTEMPORARY URBAN PLANNING TOOL GHEORGHE-GAVRILĂ HOGNOGI1, ANA-MARIA POP2 ABSTRACT – The Regional Geography papers, especially those dedicated to the “land”-type studies sequentially mention certain historical aspects, because historical evolution is treated largely as having a supportive role, far from becoming a component of interaction. This research aims to address the historical evolution of the Land of Hațeg in the light of the specific territorial elements and to provide evidence for using the built heritage as a tool for decision-makers. Methodologically, the research has implied the completion of three stages, each with its specific work methods (direct observation, mapping, chorematic analysis). The findings highlight the applicative and utilitarian character of historical studies in the land use planning documents. Keywords: Land of Hațeg, historical monument, land use planning, chorem INTRODUCTION Over the last decades, the emphasis is increasingly being placed on interdisciplinarity, regardless of the type of study addressed. This is also the case of the Regional Geography papers, where the interrelations between various territorial components argue its functionality (Cocean, 2011). In addition, although historical studies have been regulated since the 1990’s as components of the urban planning documents, they are currently not mandatory. For this reason, they are often not included. They were left at the discretion of beneficiaries who considered they did not have much impact due to the fact that many of them contained only a brief history not related to other elements of a planning document.
    [Show full text]
  • 165 Years of Roman Rule on the Left Bank of the Danube. at The
    92 Chapter III PROVINCIA DACIA AUGUSTI: 165 years of Roman rule on the left bank of the Danube. At the beginning of the 2nd century, in the Spring of 101AD, Roman Forces marched against the Kingdom of Decebal. We already know what the Roman's rationale was for starting this war and we also know that the real reason was likely to have been the personal ambition of the first Provincial Emperor, Trajan (he was born in Hispania a man of Macedonian background among Greeks). The Roman armies marched against a client-state of Rome, which was a subordinate ally of Rome. Decebal did not want to wage war against Rome and his recurring peace offers confirm this. It is unlikely that Trajan would only have decided on the total conquest of the Dacian Kingdom after he waged his first campaign in 101-102. After this, Roman garrisons were established in the Province - their ongoing presence is reflected by the Latin names of towns (as recorded by Ptolemy). At Dobreta they begin to build the stone bridge which will span the Danube. It was built in accordance with plans made by Apollodorus of Damascus to promote continuous traffic - it was an accomplishment unmatched - even by Rome. This vast project portends that Trajan began the expedition against Dacia in 101 with the intention of incorporating the Kingdom into the Roman Empire. The Emperor, who founded a city (Nicopolis) to commemorate his victory over Dacia, has embarked on this campaign not only for reasons of personal ambition. The 93 economic situation of the Empire was dismal at the beginning of Trajan's reign; by the end of the second Dacian War it has vastly improved.
    [Show full text]
  • P. Serafimov ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS of THRACIAN TOPONYMS and HYDRONYMS
    134 P. Serafimov ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THRACIAN TOPONYMS AND HYDRONYMS Abstract This paper offers an etymological analysis of more than 60 Thracian toponyms, hydronyms and oronyms. It presents the evidence that the Slavs were the indigenous population in the region, in agreement to the testimony of Simokatta, who equated Thracians (called Getae) with the Old Slavs: «Sclavos sive Getas hoc enim nomine antiquitus appellati sunt” – “Slavs or Getae, because this is the way they were called in the antiquity”. Introduction The toponyms, hydronyms and oronyms can provide very valuable information about the inhabitants of certain lands, because every ethnic group has their own names for moun- tain, valley, lake, and village more or less different from these of the other people. Slavic Bela Gora (White mountain) corresponds to German Weiss Berg, the Greek Λέύκος Oρος and Latin Albus Mons. Judging by these differences and peculiarities we can determine the ethnic affiliation of people who lived a long time ago in a certain geographical area. In this paper the attention is given to the Old Thracian lands: from the Carpathian Mountains to Asia Minor and from Black Sea till Dardania (Serbia). But I have to clarify that these regions do not represent the totality of the Thracian domain, in reality it continued to the Hercynian forest (Schwarzwald in Germany), Map 1, where according to Strabo the country of the Getae began [1], VII-2-III-1. Facts and discussion The terms for different types of settlements in the Thracian lands were: DABA (DAVA), PARA (PHARA), BRIA, DIZA, MIDNE, OSS (VIS), and DAMA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Danube in Pages of History and Literature
    2nd International Conference - Water resources and wetlands. 11-13 September, 2014 Tulcea (Romania); Available online at http://www.limnology.ro/water2014/proceedings.html Editors: Petre Gâştescu ; Włodzimierz Marszelewski ; Petre Bretcan; ISSN: 2285-7923; Pages: 577-583; Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license ; THE LOWER DANUBE IN PAGES OF HISTORY AND LITERATURE Elena Teodoreanu Ecological University of Bucharest, Bd. Lascar Catargiu nr. 24-26, sc.A. ap. 16, Bucuresti, Romania, Email [email protected] Abstract The paper examines some information on the Danube River in their lower part, from ancient historians, from Romanian chroniclers and Turkish chroniclers who accompanied the troops when attacking Romanian countries. Also we have the data reported by foreign travelers on Romanian territory, of which with the passage of time, are more numerous: Polish, Austrians and Hungarians diplomats, Catholic priests. For example we have interesting data from Syrian traveler Paul of Aleppo or Turkish chronicler Evlia Celebi. The information refers specifically to periods of overflow of the Danube and damaging floods, or droughts when shrinking waters could and river goes on foot. Most data refer to periods when the Danube froze strong, especially in the centuries that constituted the Little Ice Age (approximately Fourteenth century until the mid- nineteenth century) opportunity for the Ottoman armies crossed the Danube on the ice, to plunder the territories of north of the Danube. Finally, it presents some descriptions of Romanian writers who loved Danube swamps, delta, among which Mihail Sadoveanu and George Topârceanu. Keywords: Lower Danube, ancient historians, foreign travelers, Turkish chroniclers, Romanian writers “Wherever you would see it in this country the Danube is (…) like a human being who has seen and suffered much and his face showing all the scars left by his struggles.” George Vâlsan 1.
    [Show full text]
  • N . 6 (2010) ARHEOLOGIJA I PRIRODNE NAUKE Center for New Technology Archaeological Institute Belgrade
    No . 6 (2010) ARHEOLOGIJA I PRIRODNE NAUKE Center for New Technology Archaeological Institute Belgrade ARCHAEOLOGY AND SCIENCE 6 2010 Belgrade 2011 Centar za nove tehnologije Arheološki institut Beograd ARHEOLOGIJA I PRIRODNE NAUKE 6 2010 Beograd 2011. Published: Center for New Technology Viminacium Archaeological Institute Belgrade Kneza Mihaila 35/IV 11000 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] Tel. +381 11 2637191 For the publishers: Miomir Korać Slaviša Perić Editor-in-chief: Miomir Korać Editorial Board: Roksana Chowaniec, University of Warsaw, Institute of Archaeology, Warsaw Gianfranco Cicognani, Central European Initiative (CEI-ES), Trieste Rosemarie Cordie, Archäologiepark Belginum Eric De Sena, John Cabot University, Rome Snežana Golubović, Archaeological Institute, Belgrade Gisela Grupe, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München Michaela Harbeck, Staatssammlung für Anthropologie und Paläoanatomie, München Lanfranco Masotti, Universita’ di Bologna, Bologna Žarko Mijailović, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mathematics, Belgrade Živko Mikić, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade Milan Milosavljević, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Belgrade Dragan Milovanović, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Belgrade Zoran Obradović, Temple University, Philadelphia Zoran Ognjanović, Mathematical Institute, Belgrade Marco Pacetti, Universita’ Politecnico delle Marche, Ancona Slaviša Perić, Archaeological Institute, Belgrade Milica Tapavički-Ilić, Archaeological Institute, Belgrade
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]