Evidence from Korean Reflexive Caki
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2019 Cue-based reflexive reference resolution: Evidence from Korean reflexive caki Namseok Yong The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3287 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] CUE-BASED REFLEXIVE REFERENCE RESOLUTION: EVIDENCE FROM KOREAN REFLEXIVE CAKI by NAMSEOK YONG A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in the Linguistics Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 i © 2019 NAMSEOK YONG All Rights Reserved ii Cue-based reflexive reference resolution: Evidence from Korean reflexive caki by Namseok Yong This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in the Linguistics Program in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _____________________ ________________________________________________ Date Irina A. Sekerina, Ph.D. Chair of Examining Committee _____________________ ________________________________________________ Date Gita Martohardjono, Ph.D. Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Jason Kandybowicz, Ph.D. William McClure, Ph.D. Jiwon Yun, Ph.D. THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract Cue-based reflexive reference resolution: Evidence from Korean reflexive caki by Namseok Yong Advisor: Irina A. Sekerina, Ph.D. This dissertation aims to reveal cognitive mechanisms and factors that underlie the reflexive dependency formation. In recent years, a lot of attention has been paid to the question of how our mind works in building linguistic dependencies (including an antecedent-reflexive dependency) because relevant research has proved promising and illuminating in regard to the properties (e.g., system architecture, computational algorithms, etc.) of human language processor and its close connection with other cognitive functions such as memory (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005; Lewis, Vasishth, & Van Dyke, 2006; McElree, 2000; McElree, Foraker, & Dyer, 2003; Van Dyke & Johns, 2012; Wagers, Lau, & Phillips, 2009). Building upon this line of research, the present dissertation provides empirical evidence to show that the parser can directly access potential antecedents (stored in memory) in forming an antecedent-reflexive dependency, using various linguistic cues and contextual knowledge available at the reflexive. In order to make this claim, this dissertation examines the Korean mono-morphemic reflexive caki ‘self’ (also known as a long-distance anaphor), using acceptability judgment and self-paced reading methodologies, and iv asks (i) what linguistic factors guide its reference resolution and (ii) how they are applied to cognitive processes for memory retrieval and phrase structure building. A series of acceptability judgment experiments (Experiments 1 through 5) show that caki has a very robust referential bias: it strongly prefers a subject antecedent. Moreover, it is established that syntactic constraints (e.g., binding constraints) are not the only available source of information during caki’s reference resolution. Indeed, various non-syntactic sources of information (or cues) can also determine caki’s reference resolution. Three self-paced reading experiments (Experiments 6 through 8) provide evidence compatible with the direct-access content-addressable memory retrieval model (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005; Lewis et al., 2006; McElree, 2000; Van Dyke & McElree, 2011) Based on these experimental findings, I present an explanation of why caki preferentially forms a dependency with a subject antecedent. I argue that caki’s subject antecedent bias is driven both externally (i.e., syntactic prominence of a grammatical subject and first-mention advantage) and internally (i.e., frequency-based prediction on caki-subject dependency relation). Finally, I showcase how a referential dependency between caki and a potential antecedent can be constructed by the cue-based retrieval parser (Lewis et al., 2006; Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003). v Acknowledgements I owe a number of people an enormous debt of gratitude for getting to this point (i.e., writing “Acknowledgements” for my dissertation). Here, I would like to thank all those who helped me come this far. First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Irina A. Sekerina. Without her, I am sure, I would never be able to finish my dissertation. She was always encouraging, cheerful, and showed me exactly where I stand in the journey of my disseratation research. Thanks to her direction and guidance, I could stay on the right track. Her vision and advice made me keep moving forward. For me, she is the best role model, mentor, and research advisor without a doubt. I thank God to have her as my advisor. I would also like to thank the faculty members of my dissertation committee, Jason Kandybowicz, William McClure, and Jiwon Yun. Undoubtedly, their razor-sharp comments and suggestions greatly improved this dissertation. Furthermore, they kept encouraging me, inspiring me, and gave help in every respect. I have also benefitted from the comments and help of many other people. In particular, Seongyeon Ko at Queens College – CUNY and Miseon Lee, Taehong Cho, and Sahyang Kim at Hanyang University (Seoul, South Korea). Also, thanks to the members of Hanyang Institute for Phonetics and Cognitive Sciences of Language (HIPCS), I could collect much of the data for this dissertation. Last but not least, I would like to extend my deep gratitude to my parents, Yoonjoon Yong and Taeyeon Kim. I was able to know how srong the term “trust” is, thanks to them. My beautifual wife Songok Jo, without her sacrifice, I am sure I could not have reached the end of vi this journey. Finally, my lovely kids Victoria, Jeremy, and James Yong. They were always my strongest supporters. This dissertation is dedicated to them. vii Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ xi List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. xii List of abbreviations .................................................................................................................. xiv 1 Introduction: Reflexive dependency and relevant cognitive mechanisms ...................... 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Memory retrieval in sentence comprehension ............................................................... 13 1.2.1 Serial Search (SS) approach.................................................................................... 15 1.2.2 Direct-access, content-addressable retrieval (DCR) approach ............................... 18 1.3 Reflexive dependency resolution: empirical evidence ................................................... 23 1.3.1 Evidence: Structure-guided serial search in reflexive dependency formation ........ 23 1.3.2 Evidence: Direct-access, content-addressable retrieval .......................................... 31 2 Korean reflexive caki: its linguistic properties and comprehension .............................. 37 2.1 Inventory of reflexives in Korean .................................................................................. 37 2.2 Linguistic features of caki .............................................................................................. 42 2.2.1 Basic lexical properties of caki ............................................................................... 42 2.2.2 Syntactic/distributional properties of caki .............................................................. 45 2.2.2.1 Caki can refer to a non-c-commanding antecedent......................................... 45 2.2.2.2 Caki can bind an antecedent outside of its local domain. ............................... 48 2.2.2.3 Non-subject NP can serve as antecedent of caki. ............................................ 49 2.2.2.4 Caki can be discourse-bound. ......................................................................... 52 2.2.2.5 Interim summary .............................................................................................. 53 2.3 Comprehension of caki................................................................................................... 57 2.3.1 Locality of antecedent ............................................................................................. 58 2.3.2 Subjectivity of antecedent ....................................................................................... 63 2.4 Present research .............................................................................................................. 69 3 Off-line interpretation of caki and affecting factors........................................................