DOCSLIB.ORG

Aristarchus (1), of Samos, Greek Astronomer, Mathematician, 3Rd Century BCE | Oxford Classical Dictionary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aristarchus (1), of Samos, Greek Astronomer, Mathematician, 3Rd Century BCE | Oxford Classical Dictionary Aristarchus (1), of Samos, Greek astronomer, mathematician, 3rd century BCE Nathan Camillo Sidoli https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.737 Published online: 22 December 2015 This version: 28 June 2021 Subjects: Science, Technology, and Medicine Updated in this version Article rewritten to reflect current scholarship. Aristarchus, often called the “mathematician” in our sources, is dated through a summer solstice observation of 280 BCE attributed to him by Ptolemy (Alm. 3.1). He is said to have been a student of Straton of Lampsacus, who succeeded Theophrastus as the head of the Peripatetic school in 288/287 BCE (Stob. Ecl. 1.16.1); and he is most famous for having advanced the heliocentric hypothesis, although his only surviving work in mathematical astronomy assumes a geocentric cosmos. According to Archimedes, Aristarchus hypothesized that the fixed stars and sun are unmoved, while the earth is carried around the sun on a circle, and that the sphere of the fixed stars is so large that the ratio of the circle about which the earth moves to the distance of the stars is that which a centre has to the surface of a sphere (Sand Reckoner, 4–5). We do not know how Aristarchus understood or utilized this hypothesis, which Archimedes claims is strictly impossible, but Archimedes himself reinterprets it to mean that the ratio of the diameter of the earth to the diameter of the earth’s orbit is the same as that of the diameter of the earth’s orbit to the diameter of the cosmos. Furthermore, Plutarch says that Aristarchus supposed that the earth rotates about its own axis (De fac. 923A, Quaest. Plat. 1006C). Philolaus of Croton and Heraclides Ponticus had previously put forward various claims about the mobility of the earth, but with the exception of Seleucus of Seleucia, the Chaldaean, there is little indication that anyone further developed these ideas after Aristarchus. In fact, Archimedes himself probably had no commitment to these ideas, because he puts them forward, not to advance any serious work in astronomy, but to have the hypothesis of a very large cosmos, which he can fill with sand in order to demonstrate a new system for working with large numbers that he had invented. On the other hand, the views of Aristarchus’s contemporary, Cleanthes of Assos, the head of the Stoic school, who wrote a treatise called Against Aristarchus and asserted that charges of impiety should be brought against him (Plut. De fac. 923A, Diog. Laert. 7.125), were probably also not held by many people. Aristarchus’s only surviving work, On the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and the Moon, was an influential piece of mathematical reasoning that was included in collections of classic texts in the mathematical sciences in the late ancient and medieval periods. On Sizes assumes a geocentric configuration of the solar and lunar orbits, as shown by the description of the celestial bodies in On Sizes 6. The treatise begins with a series of six hypotheses, some of Page 1 of 3 Printed from Oxford Classical Dictionary. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 July 2021 which are purely geometrical, while others include numerical information and assert some ostensibly observational phenomena, although it is not certain what role observation actually played in their development. The treatise then proceeds through eighteen well-structured propositions, using elementary geometry, ratio manipulations, and proto-trignonometric lemmas asserting ratio inequalities between angles and sides in a right-angled triangle (see trigonometry). Through these means, Aristarchus shows that, among other things, the distance of the sun from the earth is between 18 and 20 times the distance of the moon from the earth (On Sizes 7), the ratio of the volume of the sun to that of the moon is between 5,832:1 and 8,000:1 (On Sizes 10), the ratio of the diameter of the sun to that of the earth is between 19:3 and 42:6 (On Sizes 15), the ratio of the volume of the sun to that of the earth is between 6,859:27 and 79,507:216 (On Sizes 16), the ratio of the diameter of the earth to that of the moon is between 108:43 and 60:19 (On Sizes 17), and the ratio of the volume of the earth to that of the moon is between 1,259,712:79,507 and 216,000:6,859 (On Sizes 18). (In Greek astronomical texts following Aristarchus it is also common to find celestial sizes and distances expressed as ratios.) The large discrepancies between these results and more accurate values are mostly due to certain geometric assumptions made in establishing the bounds, and to On Sizes Hypothesis 4, which asserts that the angular separation between the sun and the moon at half moon is ⅟30 of a right angle less than a right angle (= 87°). The numerical results that are derived are quite sensitive to this angle. On the other hand, On Sizes Hypothesis 6, which states that the moon subtends ⅟15 of a zodiacal sign (= 2°), has a relatively small effect on the resulting numerical ratios. Hence, even if Aristarchus had replaced this by the much more accurate value of ⅟720 of the circle of the zodiac (= ½°), which Archimedes tells us that Aristarchus had elsewhere used (Archim., Sand Reckoner, 4), it would have made little difference in the final numbers. In the 4th century BCE, Pappus compared Aristarchus’s approach to this subject with Ptolemy’s in the Almagest, and provided some lemmas of use in reading On Sizes (Pappus, Collection 6.37–40). Aristarchus is also associated with other work in the astral sciences. Vitruvius attributes to him a discussion of the causes of the phases of the moon as well as the invention of two types of sundial, hemispherical and flat-disc (De arch. 9.2.3–4, 9.8.1). Censorinus credits Aristarchus with a lunar and solar eclipse cycle that was a modification of Callippus’s cycle (DN 19.2), and he is reported to have written about the views of Thales on solar eclipses and perhaps of Heraclitus on the lunar cycle (POxy. 3710). Bibliography Berggren, J. Lennart, and Nathan Camillo Sidoli. “Aristarchus’s On the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and the Moon: Greek and Arabic texts.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 61 (2007): 213–254. Bowen, Alan C., and Bernard R. Goldstein. “Aristarchus, Thales, and Heraclitus on Solar Eclipses: An Astronomical Commentary on P. Oxy. 53.3710 Cols. 2.33–3.19.” Physics 31 (1994): 689–729. Carman, Christián. “Two problems in Aristarchus’s Treatise On the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and the Moon.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 68 (2014): 35–65. Evans, James. The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Page 2 of 3 Printed from Oxford Classical Dictionary. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 July 2021 Heath, Thomas Little. Aristarchus of Samos: The Ancient Copernicus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913. Neugebauer, Otto. A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. New York: Springer, 1975. Noack, Beate. Aristarch von Samos: Untersuchungen zur Überlieferungsgeschichte der Schrift περὶ μεγεθῶν καὶ ἀποστημάτων ἡλίου καὶ σελήνης. Wiesbaden, Germany: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 1992. Wall, Byron Emerson. “Anatomy of a Precursor: The Historiography of Aristarchos of Samos.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 6 (1975): 201–228. Related Articles astronomical instruments astronomy Philolaus Page 3 of 3 Printed from Oxford Classical Dictionary. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 July 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece
    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ancient Greek Philosophy but didn’t Know Who to Ask Edited by Patricia F. O’Grady MEET THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT GREECE Dedicated to the memory of Panagiotis, a humble man, who found pleasure when reading about the philosophers of Ancient Greece Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask Edited by PATRICIA F. O’GRADY Flinders University of South Australia © Patricia F. O’Grady 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Patricia F. O’Grady has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identi.ed as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask 1. Philosophy, Ancient 2. Philosophers – Greece 3. Greece – Intellectual life – To 146 B.C. I. O’Grady, Patricia F. 180 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask / Patricia F.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics and Cosmology in Plato's Timaeus
    apeiron 2021; aop Andrew Gregory* Mathematics and Cosmology in Plato’s Timaeus https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2020-0034 Published online March 18, 2021 Abstract: Plato used mathematics extensively in his account of the cosmos in the Timaeus, but as he did not use equations, but did use geometry, harmony and according to some, numerology, it has not been clear how or to what effect he used mathematics. This paper argues that the relationship between mathematics and cosmology is not atemporally evident and that Plato’s use of mathematics was an open and rational possibility in his context, though that sort of use of mathematics has subsequently been superseded as science has progressed. I argue that there is a philosophically and historically meaningful space between ‘primitive’ or unre- flective uses of mathematics and the modern conception of how mathematics relates to cosmology. Plato’s use of mathematics in the Timaeus enabled the cosmos to be as good as it could be, allowed the demiurge a rational choice (of which planetary orbits and which atomic shapes to instantiate) and allowed Timaeus to give an account of the cosmos (where if the demiurge did not have such a rational choice he would not have been able to do so). I also argue that within this space it is both meaningful and important to differentiate between Pythagorean and Platonic uses of number and that we need to reject the idea of ‘Pythagorean/ Platonic number mysticism’. Plato’s use of number in the Timaeus was not mystical even though it does not match modern usage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Earths of Eratosthenes Author(S): Christián Carlos Carman and James Evans Source: Isis, Vol
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 3-2015 The woT Earths of Eratosthenes James Evans University of Puget Sound, [email protected] Christián Carlos Carman Buenos Aires, Argentina Follow this and additional works at: http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/faculty_pubs Citation Christián C. Carman and James Evans, “The wT o Earths of Eratosthenes,” Isis 106 (2015), 1-16. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Two Earths of Eratosthenes Author(s): Christián Carlos Carman and James Evans Source: Isis, Vol. 106, No. 1 (March 2015), pp. 1-16 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/681034 . Accessed: 08/12/2015 15:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristarchus of Samos and Graeco-Babylonian Astronomy George Huxley
    Arfstarchus of Samos and Graeco-Babylonian Astronomy Huxley, George Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1964; 5, 2; ProQuest pg. 123 Aristarchus of Samos and Graeco-Babylonian Astronomy George Huxley N THE HALF CENTURY following the death of Alexander the Great the I history of astronomy amongst the Greeks is dominated by Aris­ tarchus the Samian, who is best known for his theory of the earth's revolution about the sun. His life cannot be dated exactly, but it is clear that he was already of mature age by 280 B.C., for Ptolemy states that "the men around Aristarchus," that is to say his pupils, observed the summer solstice in that year, the 50th of the first Callippic period [Ptolemy, Almagest 3.1]. He was a pupil of Strato the Lampsacene, who succeeded Theophrastus as head of the Lyceum in ca. 288/7 B.C. [Apollodorus 244 F 40] and remained in that post for eighteen years till his death not later than 269 B.C. [Apollodorus 244 F 350]. The date of the publication of Aristarchus's heliocentric theory is not known, but the doctrine was attacked by Cleanthes the Stoic land so must have been well known by 232 B.C., when Cleanthes died; but the helio­ centric hypothesis may have been formulated much earlier than that. Vitruvius spoke highly of the versatility of Aristarchus in geometry, astronomy, and music [De Architectura 1.1.16], and ascribes to him the invention of two kinds of sundial-the hemispherical uKac/>T} and the disc in the plane [9.8.1].2 He perhaps made use of these improved instruments in his observations of the solstices.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellas in the East: Dr. Nikolaos Mavridis Moments and Portraits Phd, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Hellas in the East: Dr. Nikolaos Mavridis Moments and Portraits PhD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Abstract Hellenism, throughout its millennia of historical existence, has mainly been associated with the West: Athens, Rome, and Jerusalem are often regarded as providing the main pillars of “Western Civilization”, whatever the semantics attributed to this term might be. However, in this paper it is argued that, not only geographically, but also culturally, Hellenism might well have very strongly reciprocally influenced cultures that are usually classified as more “Eastern” – starting from Persia to Arabia and to the Islamic civilization, and moving all the way, through the Indian subcontinent, to Central Asia and the Far East. In this paper, through a collection of 12 moments and portraits, a first sampling of the spatio- temporal axis of the convolution of Hellas and the East is provided, with a special emphasis to the main ingredients of this most interesting living synergy: not only Times and Places, but most importantly People and Ideas. Introduction The arrival of the Proto-Greeks [1] to the southern tip of the Balkans, is usually dated at the end of the 3rd millennium BC. Since then, Hellenism has passed through many historical phases: From the Cycladic and the Minoan, through the Mycenaean, to the Classical, Hellenistic, Roman, Byzantine, Ottoman, all the way to the modern Greek State. As witnessed by the three main names used when referring to the Greeks, there seem to always have been three different viewpoints towards them (“Greeks-Grece” when viewing Greece from the West, “Yunan-Yavan” [2] when viewed from the East, and “Hellenes-‘Ελληνες” when viewed from their own self).
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Through the Ages 1 Early History and Greek Astronomy
    Astronomy Through the Ages 1 Early History and Greek Astronomy ASTR 101 9/26/2018 1 Early History • Astronomy is often described as the oldest of the natural sciences. – Humans attempts to understand and make sense of the sky predates antiquity. – Religious, mythological and astrological beliefs and practices of pre-historical societies related to celestial objects and events can be seen from many artifacts that have survived to date. The Blanchard Bone, depicting a series of moon phases (France. 25,000 - 32,000 BCE) Stonehenge The Mayan observatory at Chichen Itza, seemed to have built to observe Venus and the Sun. The pyramid is aligned to solar equinox 2 Babylonian and ancient Egyptian astronomy (left) Mul Apin tablet(1100 BCE): Describing the appearance of different constellations and stars: Astronomical ceiling. 1470BCE Egyptian tomb (right) Babylonian clay tablets listing observation of Venus painting with constellations, planets, lunar th c. 7 century BCE. www.mesopotamia.co.uk/astronomer/explore/mulapin1.html cycle and stars depicted. • Astronomy and mathematics were in an advance state in the Babylonian civilization: • They kept records of position of the stars and planets and eclipses Many constellations visible from the northern hemisphere, and the zodiac are of Babylonian/Sumerian origin. • They used a number system with base 60 (sexadesimal), and a year of 360 days. • Circle 360 degrees, 60 minutes and 60 seconds descend from the Babylonian sexadesimal number system. • Egyptian astronomy mostly carried out by priest astronomers was largely concerned with time reckoning. Its main lasting contribution was the civil calendar of 365 days, with 12 months 3 • Unable to comprehend their underlying causes, early cultures resort to mysticism and religion for answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography A. Aaboe, Episodes from the Early History of Mathematics (Random House, New York, 1964) A.D. Aczel, Fermat’s Last Theorem: Unlocking the Secret of an Ancient Mathematical Problem (Four Walls Eight Windows, New York, 1996) D. Adamson, Blaise Pascal: Mathematician, Physicist, and Thinker About God (St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1995) R.P. Agarwal, H. Agarwal, S.K. Sen, Birth, Growth and Computation of Pi to ten trillion digits. Adv. Differ. Equat. 2013, 100 (2013) A.A. Al-Daffa’, The Muslim Contribution to Mathematics (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, 1977) A.A. Al-Daffa’, J.J. Stroyls, Studies in the Exact Sciences in Medieval Islam (Wiley, New York, 1984) E.J. Aiton, Leibniz: A Biography (A. Hilger, Bristol, Boston, 1984) R.E. Allen, Greek Philosophy: Thales to Aristotle (The Free Press, New York, 1966) G.J. Allman, Greek Geometry from Thales to Euclid (Arno Press, New York, 1976) E.N. da C. Andrade, Sir Issac Newton, His Life and Work (Doubleday & Co., New York, 1954) W.S. Anglin, Mathematics: A Concise History and Philosophy (Springer, New York, 1994) W.S. Anglin, The Queen of Mathematics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995) H.D. Anthony, Sir Isaac Newton (Abelard-Schuman, New York, 1960) H.G. Apostle, Aristotle’s Philosophy of Mathematics (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1952) R.C. Archibald, Outline of the history of mathematics.Am. Math. Monthly 56 (1949) B. Artmann, Euclid: The Creation of Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1999) C.N. Srinivasa Ayyangar, The History of Ancient Indian Mathematics (World Press Private Ltd., Calcutta, 1967) A.K. Bag, Mathematics in Ancient and Medieval India (Chaukhambha Orientalia, Varanasi, 1979) W.W.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Solar System
    MEASURING THE SOLAR SYSTEM Eratosthenes, Aristarchus The century after Euclid Two remarkable astronomers, Eratosthenes and Aristarchus, accomplished what seemed impossible in the ancient world, they measured the size of the solar system. It is significant that this took place during the century after Euclid. Euclid’s geometry empowered creative people like these two to do things they would not otherwise have been able to accomplish. Solving great problems requires first asking the right question. The questions we are discussing were posed by these two in geometric terms. Once set forth in those terms, the problems became quite straightforward to answer as we will see. So Euclid’s work was not only the greatest mathematical advance of the ancient world, it also allowed others to use those tools to reach farther than ever before imagined in understanding the world around us. SHADOWS SIZE OF EARTH ERATOSTHENES - 225 BC Eratosthenes was a Renaissance Man of his generation in ancient Greece (almost 2000 years ahead of his time). He was very good, but never the best at whatever he did. He was only the second best mathematician, second best poet, second best musician, etc. In ancient Greece, they used the alphabet, alpha, beta, gamma, etc, to indicate first place, second, third, etc. So his friends gave him the knickname Beta. Well, Beta left his mark on the world, perhaps more so than his friends. He managed one of the great accomplishments of the ancient world; he measured the size of the earth. ERATOSTHENES BELIEVED EARTH TO BE SPHERICAL SUN’S RAYS NEARLY PARALLEL THEREFORE SUN’S RAYS ARRIVE AT DIFFERENT ANGLES AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS Here is how his thinking went.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise History of the Philosophy of Mathematics
    A Thumbnail History of the Philosophy of Mathematics "It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Imannuel Kant ( 1724 – 1804 ) ( However naïve realism is no substitute for truth [1] ) [1] " ... concepts have reference to sensible experience, but they are never, in a logical sense, deducible from them. For this reason I have never been able to comprehend the problem of the á priori as posed by Kant", from "The Problem of Space, Ether, and the Field in Physics" ( "Das Raum-, Äether- und Feld-Problem der Physik." ), by Albert Einstein, 1934 - source: "Beyond Geometry: Classic Papers from Riemann to Einstein", Dover Publications, by Peter Pesic, St. John's College, Sante Fe, New Mexico Mathematics does not have a universally accepted definition during any period of its development throughout the history of human thought. However for the last 2,500 years, beginning first with the pre - Hellenic Egyptians and Babylonians, mathematics encompasses possible deductive relationships concerned solely with logical truths derived by accepted philosophic methods of logic which the classical Greek thinkers of antiquity pioneered. Although it is normally associated with formulaic algorithms ( i.e., mechanical methods ), mathematics somehow arises in the human mind by the correspondence of observation and inductive experiential thinking together with its practical predictive powers in interpreting future as well as "seemingly" ephemeral phenomena. Why all of this is true in human progress, no one can answer faithfully. In other words, human experiences and intuitive thinking first suggest to the human mind the abstract symbols for which the economy of human thinking mathematics is well known; but it is those parts of mathematics most disconnected from observation and experience and therefore relying almost wholly upon its internal, self - consistent, deductive logics giving mathematics an independent reified, almost ontological, reality, that mathematics most powerfully interprets the ultimate hidden mysteries of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • From Mythology to Science: the Development of Scientific
    From mythology to science: the development of scientific hydrological concepts in the Greek antiquity and its relevance to modern hydrology Demetris Koutsoyiannis* and Nikos Mamassis Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical 5 University of Athens, Heroon Polytechneiou 5, GR 157 80 Zographou, Greece * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. Whilst hydrology is a Greek term, it has not been in use in the Classical literature but much later, during the Renaissance, in its Latin version, hydrologia. On the other hand, Greek natural philosophers (or, in modern vocabulary, scientists) created robust knowledge in related scientific areas, to which they gave names such as meteorology, climate and 10 hydraulics. These terms are now in common use internationally. Greek natural philosophers laid the foundation of hydrological 30 Deleted: Within these areas, concepts and the hydrological cycle in its entirety. Knowledge development was brought about by search for technological solutions to practical problems, as well as by scientific curiosity. While initial explanations belong to the sphere of mythology, Deleted: to explain natural phenomena the rise of philosophy was accompanied by the quest for scientific descriptions of the phenomena. It appears that the first Deleted: attempts to provide geophysical problem formulated in scientific terms was the explanation of the flood regime of the Nile, then regarded as a 15 paradox because of the spectacular difference from the river flow regime in Greece, i.e., the fact that the Nile flooding occurs Deleted: and other Mediterranean regions in summer when in most of the Mediterranean the rainfall is very low.
    [Show full text]
  • Eratosthenes of Cyrene (C.276-C.196 BC) Aristarchus of Samos (C.310-C
    Eratosthenes of Cyrene (c.276­c.196 BC) A Greek scholar who was the first person to determine the circumference of the Earth. He compared the midsummer’s noon shadow in deep wells in Cyrene (now Aswan on the Nile in Egypt) and Alexandria. Then, correctly assuming that the Sun’s rays are virtually parallel (since the Sun is so far away) and knowing the distance between the two locations, he worked out the Earth’s circumference to be 250,000 stadia. The exact length of a stadium is not known, so his accuracy is uncertain, but he wasn’t far off the mark. Among his many other accomplishments, he accurately measured the tilt of Earth’s axis and the distance to the Sun and Moon, and devised a method for finding all the prime numbers up to a given number (the Sieve of Eratosthenes). Eratosthenes Aristarchus of Samos (c.310­c.230 BC) A Greek mathematician and astronomer who was the first to propose a heliocentric theory, with Earth revolving around the Sun. To explain the lack of observed stellar parallax, he argued that the stars must lie very far away. However, his new scheme for the Solar System found little support at a time when Aristotle’s geocentric model was in favor and the idea of a moving Earth was frowned upon. Aristarchus also applied modern geometric methods to measuring the size of celestial bodies. From a lunar eclipse, he concluded that the Moon’s radius is half that of Earth (actually it is 0.28 times as big).
    [Show full text]
  • The Hellenistic Period1
    The Hellenistic Period1 In this brief section, we show what type of problems mathemati- cians solved, and the extent of Greek mathematics before the collapse of the mathematical world in about 400 CE. 1 Aristarchus of Samos (CA. 310-230 BCE) Aristarchus of Samos was considered by the ancients, particularly Vit- ruvius2, who considered him to be one of the few great men knowl- edgeable in all sciences, especially astronomy and mathematics. Note that his dates are only surmised. For example, he lived before the Sand Reckoner of Archimedes, a work published before 216 BCE. He is also known to have observed the summer solstice in about 280 BCE. Perhaps, foremost among them is that he formulated the Coperni- can hypothesis He was the first to formulate the Copernican hypotheses and is sometimes called the Ancient Copernican. His heliocentric the- ory was never accepted in his day and remained dormant until it was proposed again by Copernicus. His contributions to science and math- ematics are many. He discovered an improved sundial, with a concave hemispherical circle. In supporting his heliocentric theory, he countered the non parallax objection by asserting that the stars to be so far dis- tant that parallax was not measurable. For this he needed the following measure of distance to the stars. distance(earth, stars) distance(radius of the sun) » He also determined a more accurate estimate of the solar year. He wrote as well on light and colors. He wrote On the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and Moon,in which by the way the heliocentric ideas are not mentioned or in any event are not present in the copied version extant.
    [Show full text]