Hans-Werner Sinn Und 25 Jahre Deutsche Wirtschaftspolitik
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CALENDRIER Du 11 Février Au 17 Février 2019 Brussels, 8 February 2019 (Susceptible De Modifications En Cours De Semaine) Déplacements Et Visites
European Commission - Weekly activities CALENDRIER du 11 février au 17 février 2019 Brussels, 8 February 2019 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 11 février 2019 Eurogroup President Jean-Claude Juncker receives Mr Frank Engel, Member of the European Parliament. President Jean-Claude Juncker receives Mr Sven Giegold, Member of the European Parliament. President Jean-Claude Juncker receives Mr Joseph Daul, President of the European People's Party and Manfred Weber, Chairman of the EPP Group, in the European Parliament. President Jean-Claude Juncker receives Mr José Ignacio Salafranca, Member of the European Parliament. Mr Jyrki Katainen receives representatives of the Medicines for Europe Association. Mr Günther H. Oettinger in Berlin, Germany: meets representatives of the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP). Mr Pierre Moscovici à Berlin, en Allemagne : participe à une réunion du parti social-démocrate allemande, (SPD). Mr Christos Stylianides in Barcelona, Spain: meets Mr Antoni Segura, President of the Barcelona Centre for International Affairs; participates in a debate on Civil Protection at the Barcelona Centre for International Affairs; holds a speech at an information seminar on the European Solidarity Corps; holds a speech at the third meeting of Civil Protection Director-Generals of the Member States of the Union for the Mediterranean; and holds a speech at an event on Forest Fire Prevention at the European Forest Institute Mediterranean Facility. Mr Phil Hogan in Sydney, Australia: visits the University of Sydney Institute of Agriculture. Ms Mariya Gabriel in Berlin, Germany: visits the John Lennon Gymnasium together with filmmaker Wim Wenders and delivers a speech on Safer Internet. -
(Jens Spahn), Ralph Brinkhaus
Sondierungsgruppen Finanzen/Steuern CDU: Peter Altmaier (Jens Spahn), Ralph Brinkhaus CSU: Markus Söder, Hans Michelbach SPD: Olaf Scholz, Carsten Schneider Wirtschaft/Verkehr/Infrastruktur/Digitalisierung I/Bürokratie CDU: Thomas Strobl, Carsten Linnemann CSU: Alexander Dobrindt, Ilse Aigner, Peter Ramsauer SPD: Thorsten Schäfer-Gümbel, Anke Rehlinger, Sören Bartol Energie/Klimaschutz/Umwelt CDU: Armin Laschet, Thomas Bareiß CSU: Thomas Kreuzer, Georg Nüßlein, Ilse Aigner SPD: Stephan Weil, Matthias Miersch Landwirtschaft/Verbraucherschutz CDU: Julia Klöckner, Gitta Connemann CSU: Christian Schmidt, Helmut Brunner SPD: Anke Rehlinger, Rita Hagel Bildung/Forschung CDU: Helge Braun, Michael Kretschmer CSU: Stefan Müller, Ludwig Spaenle SPD: Manuela Schwesig, Hubertus Heil Arbeitsmarkt/Arbeitsrecht/Digitalisierung II CDU: Helge Braun, Karl-Josef Laumann CSU: Stefan Müller, Emilia Müller SPD: Andrea Nahles, Malu Dreyer Familie/Frauen/Kinder/Jugend CDU: Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, Nadine Schön CSU: Angelika Niebler, Paul Lehrieder SPD: Manuela Schwesig, Katja Mast Soziales/Rente/Gesundheit/Pflege CDU: Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, Hermann Gröhe, Sabine Weiss CSU: Barbara Stamm, Melanie Huml, Stephan Stracke SPD: Malu Dreyer, Andrea Nahles, Karl Lauterbach Migration/Integration CDU: Volker Bouffier, Thomas de Maizière CSU: Joachim Herrmann, Andreas Scheuer SPD: Ralf Stegner, Boris Pistorius Innen/Recht CDU: Thomas Strobl, Thomas de Maizière CSU: Joachim Herrmann, Stephan Mayer SPD: Ralf Stegner, Eva Högl Kommunen/Wohnungsbau/Mieten/ländlicher -
Language, Migration and Citizenship in Europe
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Language Policy and Social Inclusion: Language, Migration and Citizenship in Europe M by Patrick Stevenson Centre for Transnational Studies University of Southampton UK I DELIVERED AT THE CONFERENCE Debating Language Policies in Canada and Europe University of Ottawa Ottawa (Ontario) Canada 31 March - 2 April 2005 DRAFT/NOT FOR CITATION I Introduction: Language, Migration and Anti-Cosmopolitanism In the literature on language policy and language planning in modern nation-states, lan- guage is seen to be central both to the practical, instrumental processes of nation build- ing (for example, in relation to citizenship) and to the symbolic, integrative processes of developing a national ‘culture’ (for example, in relation to national identity) (Wright 2004: 42). Standard languages, in particular, are seen as both a vehicle for articulating and achieving common political goals and a manifestation of a common purpose and singular identity. While these processes are sometimes cast as political and ideological issues respectively, I want to argue that discourses of citizenship are not separate from, but rather subsumed in, discourses of national identity, and that recent public debates and national policies on the relationship between language and citizenship in western European states are not merely issues of political ‘management’ but part of a larger ide- ological process and constitute a classic example of what Blommaert (1999) calls a lan- guage ideological debate1. 1. Ingrid Piller (2001) argues along similar lines in her critique of naturalization language testing in a range of con- texts (including, as in the present paper, Germany). For a recent critical analysis of debates on language testing régimes in relation to citizenship in Britain, see Blackledge (2004). -
Collaborate, Understand, Innovate
Collaborate, understand, innovate. 2013 Reports and Accounts his report describes the work that the UniCredit & Universities Foundation is doing to support the studies and research of TEurope’s brightest young minds. It details the full range of programs implemented by the foundation to assist promising young people develop original ideas in the fields of economics and finance. Collaboration, understanding, innovation, facilitation, selectivity and responsiveness are all key aspects of the UniCredit & Universities mission. These words express the motivations that underlie the foundation’s programs for students and researchers who want to make a difference. The foundation is committed to providing them with concrete solutions and tangible benefits that can clear a pathway to their future careers. At the heart of its activities, UniCredit & Universities listens closely to its scholars and fellows to ensure that it can provide them with direct and effective support. This is a vital part of the process of enabling them to focus on their work at the world’s best academic institutions. The foundation seeks to make these opportunities available to students and researchers in every community where UniCredit is present. Inside this report, you will find the full record of the activities and ideals embraced by UniCredit & Universities. The stories and statistics it contains are intended to further enhance foundation’s relationship with all of its stakeholders and reaffirm its commitment to its work. 2013 Reports and Accounts Collaborate Working more efficiently, with better results Effective academic work requires a willingness and an ability to interact well with everyone in the university environment. At UniCredit & Universities, collaboration is not only a way of working but also a mindset. -
Deutscher Bundestag
Deutscher Bundestag 44. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Freitag, 27.Juni 2014 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 4 Entschließungsantrag der Abgeordneten Caren Lay, Eva Bulling-Schröter, Dr. Dietmar Bartsch, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE. zu der dritten Beratung des Gesetzentwurfs der Bundesregierung Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur grundlegenden Reform des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes und zur Änderung weiterer Bestimmungen des Energiewirtschaftsrechts - Drucksachen 18/1304, 18/1573, 18/1891 und 18/1901 - Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 575 Nicht abgegebene Stimmen: 56 Ja-Stimmen: 109 Nein-Stimmen: 465 Enthaltungen: 1 Ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 27.06.2014 Beginn: 10:58 Ende: 11:01 Seite: 1 Seite: 2 Seite: 2 CDU/CSU Name Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg. Stephan Albani X Katrin Albsteiger X Peter Altmaier X Artur Auernhammer X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Julia Bartz X Günter Baumann X Maik Beermann X Manfred Behrens (Börde) X Veronika Bellmann X Sybille Benning X Dr. Andre Berghegger X Dr. Christoph Bergner X Ute Bertram X Peter Beyer X Steffen Bilger X Clemens Binninger X Peter Bleser X Dr. Maria Böhmer X Wolfgang Bosbach X Norbert Brackmann X Klaus Brähmig X Michael Brand X Dr. Reinhard Brandl X Helmut Brandt X Dr. Ralf Brauksiepe X Dr. Helge Braun X Heike Brehmer X Ralph Brinkhaus X Cajus Caesar X Gitta Connemann X Alexandra Dinges-Dierig X Alexander Dobrindt X Michael Donth X Thomas Dörflinger X Marie-Luise Dött X Hansjörg Durz X Jutta Eckenbach X Dr. Bernd Fabritius X Hermann Färber X Uwe Feiler X Dr. Thomas Feist X Enak Ferlemann X Ingrid Fischbach X Dirk Fischer (Hamburg) X Axel E. -
What Does GERMANY Think About Europe?
WHat doEs GERMaNY tHiNk aboUt europE? Edited by Ulrike Guérot and Jacqueline Hénard aboUt ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: •a pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over one hundred Members - politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries - which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer and Mabel van Oranje. • a physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome and Sofia. In the future ECFR plans to open offices in Warsaw and Brussels. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • a distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets. -
Complete Protocol
133rd Bergedorf Round Table Reforms in the Middle East How Can Europe and the US Contribute ? March 17–19, 2006, Washington, D. C. CONTENTS Picture Documentation 1 Participants 20 Summary 21 Protocol Welcome 23 I. EU and US Approaches 24 1. Definitions of the Middle East 24 2. EU and USA: Strengths, Weaknesses and Common Ground 25 3. The Middle East After the Invasion of Iraq 39 4. Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib 44 II. Regional Perspectives 47 1. The West and the Region’s Autocrats 47 2. Perceptions and Prejudices 51 3. The Arab-Israeli Conflict 56 4. Causes of Radicalism 58 5. Can the Middle East be Democratic ? 60 III. What Should Be Done ? 75 1. The Arab-Israeli Conflict 76 2. Iran 81 3. Instruments and Partners for Reform 89 4. Iraq 97 5. Transatlantic Cooperation 99 Annex 6. Turkey and Lebanon — Models for the Region ? 103 Participants 110 Recommended Literature 118 Glossary 120 Index 128 Previous Round Tables 132 The Körber Foundation 143 Imprint 144 INITIATOR Joschka Fischer, MdB fmr. German Foreign Minister, Dr. Kurt A. Körber German Bundestag, Berlin MDg Dr. Horst Freitag Director General, Near and Middle Eastern Affairs and CHAIR the Maghreb, Federal Foreign Office, Berlin Dr. Werner Hoyer, MdB Dr. Theo Sommer Deputy Chairman and Spokesman for Foreign Affairs, Editor-at-Large, DIE ZEIT, Hamburg FDP Parliamentary Group, German Bundestag, Berlin Dr. Saad Eddin Ibrahim Chairman of the Board, Ibn Khaldun Center for SPEAKERS Development Studies, Cairo Dr. Mohamed M. Kamal Professor Dr. Sadeq Al-Azm Member, Committee on Education and Youth, Visiting Professor, Princeton University, Princeton Shura Council, Cairo Dr. -
Giving Hardship the Red Card - Uninews
Interview : Giving hardship the red card - UniNews https://uninews.unicredit.eu/en/articles/headlines/interview/?ida=13789 Home > Articles > Headlines > Interview > Details Giving hardship the red card September 12, 2012 On occasion of the UEFA Champions League final at the Munich it was announced that UniCredit Foundation and Hvb would be extending their partnership with the buntkicktgutassociation. On occasion of the UEFA Champions League final at the Olympiapark in Munich it was announced that UniCredit Foundation and Hvb would be extending their partnership with the Buntkicktgut association. It was back in 2009 that UniCredit first began supporting this association which uses street football as a tool for favouring integration among young immigrants that live in conditions of social hardship. The history and the goals of the project as described by Rudiger Heid, director and founder of buntkicktgut. Buntkicktgut is considered a pioneering project in street football. What does it consist of? Could you briefly talk about it? «It was around 1995/96 when I discovered that football and even more street football was an ideal and attractive medium for a continuous work with socially disadvantaged and marginalized young people - especially with a migration background. With my background as a geographer and a high sensitivity for issues of migration, ethnical or political conflicts and regional disparities I was engaged in so called community lodgings for war refugees and applicants for political asylum. Many individuals and families living there with their children came from Afghanistan and Africa, but most from former Yugoslavia in order to take refuge from the terrible and the whole decade lasting Balkan wars in the 1990s. -
Ostracized in the West, Elected in the East – the Successors of the SED
Volume 10. One Germany in Europe, 1989 – 2009 The Red Socks (June 24, 1994) The unexpected success of the successor party to the SED, the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS), at the ballot box in East Germany put the established (Western) parties in a difficult situation: what response was called for, ostracism or integration? The essay analyzes the reasons behind the success of the PDS in the East and the changing party membership. The Party that Lights a Fire Ostracized in the West, voted for in the East – the successors to the SED are drawing surprising support. Discontent over reunification, GDR nostalgia, or a yearning for socialism – what makes the PDS attractive? Last Friday, around 12:30 pm, a familiar ritual began in the Bundestag. When representative Uwe-Jens Heuer of the PDS stepped to the lectern, the parliamentary group of the Union [CDU/CSU] transformed itself into a raging crowd. While Heuer spoke of his party’s SED past, heckling cries rained down on him: “nonsense,” “outrageous.” The PDS makes their competitors’ blood boil, more so than ever. Saxony-Anhalt votes for a new Landtag [state parliament] on Sunday, and the successor to the SED could get twenty percent of the vote. It did similarly well in the European elections in several East German states. In municipal elections, the PDS has often emerged as the strongest faction, for example, in Halle, Schwerin, Rostock, Neubrandenburg, and Hoyerswerda. A specter is haunting East Germany. Is socialism celebrating a comeback, this time in democratic guise? All of the Bonn party headquarters are in a tizzy. -
Paper: the Political Economy of Germany in the Sovereign Debt Crisis
The Political Economy of Germany in the Sovereign Debt Crisis Daniela Schwarzer German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) Paper prepared for Resolving the European Debt Crisis, a conference hosted by the Peterson Institute for International Economics and Bruegel, Chantilly, France, September 13-14, 2011. 1. The German Economic Situation Economic Growth Perspectives and Employment After the downturn in 2008–09, there has been a strong economic recovery in Germany in 2010 and the first half of 2011. But in the context of an economic deceleration expected for the OECD countries, also the German economy will probably slow down considerably in the second half of 2011 and in 2012. Export growth is likely to weaken as key export markets cool down, partly due to fiscal tightening in Germany’s main trading partners. Export growth scored a high 14.4 percent in 2010 and is likely to decelerate to 8 percent in 2011, as a consequence of fiscal tightening and the flattening of the stock cycle in most major markets. Meanwhile, import growth is expected to decrease from 12.8 percent in 2010 to a still strong 6.6 percent in 2011. Domestic demand is also expected to decline as consumers and business are becoming more cautious. Private consumption growth is forecast to accelerate to 1.6 percent in 2011 from 0.4 percent in 2010, but will then stay at around 1.4 percent on average in 2012 to 2015. Employment is expected to expand which will support domestic demand, but real wages are expected to grow only slowly. -
Annual Report 2010 Contents
ANNUAL REPORT 2010 CONTENTS EDITORIAL 2 BUILDING BRIDGES: 20 YEARS OF THE ROSA LUXEMBURG FOUNDATION 4 Award-winning east-west projects 5 Posters from 20 years of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation 6 KEY ISSUE: AUTOMOBILES, ENERGY AND POLITICS 8 «Power to the People» conference of the Academy of Political Education 9 «Auto.Mobil.Krise.» Conference of the Institute for Social Analysis 10 THE ACADEMY OF POLITICAL EDUCATION 12 PUBLICATIONS OF THE ROSA LUXEMBURG FOUNDATION 16 EDUCATIONAL WORK IN THE FEDERAL STATES 20 CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL DIALOGUE AND COOPERATION 32 Interview with the new director of the Centre, Wilfried Telkämper 33 New presences: The Foundations in Belgrade and Quito 34 Africa Conference «Resistance and awakening» 35 Visit by El Salvador’s foreign minister 36 Israel and Palestine: Gender dimensions. Conference in Brussels 36 RELAUNCH OF THE FOUNDATION WEBSITE 40 PROJECT SPONSORSHIP 42 FINANCIAL AND CONCEPTUAL SUPPORT: THE SCHOLARSHIP DEPARTMENT 52 Academic tutors 54 Conferences of the scholarship department 56 RosAlumni – an association for former scholarship recipients 57 Scholarship recipient and rabbi: Alina Treiger 57 ARCHIVE AND LIBRARY 58 Finding aid 58 What is a finding aid? 59 About the Foundation’s library: Interview with Uwe Michel 60 THE CULTURAL FORUM OF THE ROSA LUXEMBURG FOUNDATION 61 PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT 64 THE FOUNDATION’S BODIES 66 General Assembly 66 Executive Board 68 Scientific Advisory Council 69 Discussion Groups 70 ORGANIGRAM 72 THE FOUNDATION’S BUDGET 74 PUBLISHING DETAILS/PHOTOS 80 1 Editorial Dear readers, new political developments, the movements for democratic change in many Arab countries, or the natural and nuclear disaster in Japan all point to one thing: we must be careful about assumed certainties. -
Who Is Who in Impeding Climate Protection
Who is Who in Impeding Climate Protection Links between politics and the energy industry The short route to climate collapse The UK meteorological offi ce forecast at the very beginning of the year that 2007 would be the warmest year since weather records began being made. The scientists there estimated that the global average temperature would be 0.54 degrees above the 14 degree average experienced over many years. The record so far, an average of 14.52 degrees, is held by 1998. 2005, which was similarly warm, went into the meteorologists’ record books on reaching an average of 14.65 degrees in the northern hemisphere. Findings made by the German meteorological service also confi rm the atmosphere to be warming. Shortly before the beginning of 2007 the service reported that the year 2006 had been one of the warmest years since weather records began being made in 1901, and the month of July had been the hottest ever since then. An average of 9.5 degrees was 1.3 degrees Celsius above the long-term average of 8.2 degrees. International climate experts are agreed that the global rise in temperature must stay below two degrees Celsius if the effects of climate change are to remain controllable. But the time corridor for the effective reduction of greenhouse gases damaging to the climate is getting narrower and narrower. In the last century already the Earth’s average temperature rose by 0.8 degrees. The experts in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change anticipate a further rise of up to 6.4 degrees by 2100.