DOCSLIB.ORG

Progress and Challenges in Probing the Human Brain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progress and Challenges in Probing the Human Brain University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Neuroethics Publications Center for Neuroscience & Society 10-2015 Progress and Challenges in Probing the Human Brain Russell A. Poldrack Martha J. Farah University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons, and the Neurosciences Commons Recommended Citation Poldrack, R. A., & Farah, M. J. (2015). Progress and Challenges in Probing the Human Brain. Nature, 526 (7573), 371-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature15692 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/136 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Progress and Challenges in Probing the Human Brain Abstract Perhaps one of the greatest scientific challenges is to understand the human brain. Here we review current methods in human neuroscience, highlighting the ways that they have been used to study the neural bases of the human mind. We begin with a consideration of different levels of description relevant to human neuroscience, from molecules to large-scale networks, and then review the methods that probe these levels and the ability of these methods to test hypotheses about causal mechanisms. Functional MRI is considered in particular detail, as it has been responsible for much of the recent growth of human neuroscience research. We briefly er view its inferential strengths and weaknesses and present examples of new analytic approaches that allow inferences beyond simple localization of psychological processes. Finally, we review the prospects for real-world applications and new scientific challenges for human neuroscience. Keywords cognitive neuroscience, psychiatric disorders Disciplines Bioethics and Medical Ethics | Neuroscience and Neurobiology | Neurosciences This working paper is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/136 REVIEW doi:10.1038/nature15692 ; Progress and challenges in probing < the human brain = Russell A. Poldrack1 & Martha J. Farah2 > Perhaps one of the greatest scientific challenges is to understand the human brain. Here we review current methods in human neuroscience, highlighting the ways that they have been used to study the neural bases of the human mind. We ? begin with a consideration of different levels of description relevant to human neuroscience, from molecules to large-scale networks, and then review the methods that probe these levels and the ability of these methods to test hypotheses about causal mechanisms. Functional MRI is considered in particular detail, as it has been responsible for much of the recent growth of human neuroscience research. We briefly review its inferential strengths and weaknesses and present examples of new analytic approaches that allow inferences beyond simple localization of psychological processes. Finally, we review the prospects for real-world applications and new scientific challenges for human neuroscience. he way that we conceptualize brain function has always been of one centimetre. The second characteristic is the ability of each method constrained by the methods available to study it. Studies of to elucidate the mechanistic role of an observed brain molecule, cell, T patients with focal brain lesions in the nineteenth century led region or network in a mental function of interest. By mechanism we to the view of the brain as a collection of focal centres specialized for mean the causal chain of events that result in the realization of a func- particular cognitive abilties, such as ‘Broca’s area’ for speech production. tion. To fully understand human brain function is to know the causal The development of neurophysiological recording techniques in the chains of events at the molecular, cellular, population, and network twentieth century led to Barlow’s ‘neuron doctrine’, according to which levels that give rise to psychological function. For this reason, the power the functions of individual neurons can be extrapolated to explain the to identify causal relationships is a crucial dimension of difference function of the brain as a whole. The cognitive neuroimaging studies of among methods. the 1980s focused on subtractive comparisons between cognitive tasks Some methods used in the study of human brain function provide meant to isolate specific cognitive operations, and led to a relatively relatively little insight into causal mechanisms. This includes methods modular view of brain function as involving localized and separable that exploit naturally occurring variation by observing the strength of regions that implement elementary mental operations. association between individual differences in brain function and beha- The methods of contemporary human neuroscience have provided a viour. Analysis of relationships between behavioural traits, genes, brain much more complex and nuanced view of the human brain as a dynamic structure, and brain function exemplify this approach (see Box 1 for a network with multiple levels of organization, in which function is char- discussion of genomic approaches). For many important psychological acterized by a balance of regional specialization and network integ- phenomena, from effects of life history to personality traits, we are limited ration. Although current methods are limited in their utility for to observational methods. For example, individual differences in the per- studying brain function at fine-grained levels of organization (such as sonality trait of impulsiveness have been associated with differences in single neurons or cortical columns), human neuroscience has nonethe- striatal dopamine release1, fMRI activation2, and cortical grey matter less made remarkable progress in understanding basic aspects of func- volume3. Observed associations between neural and psychological traits tional organization, and with this have come a number of applications to do not necessarily imply a causal relationship, as these associations could address real-world problems. Our goal here is to review the current state result from an unmeasured third variable that independently influences of human neuroscience, focusing on what kinds of questions can and the two measures. Nevertheless, such associations provide a valuable cannot be answered using current techniques and how those answers are starting point for theorizing about the neural mechanisms of human relevant to real-world applications. psychology, and their evidentiary value can be strengthened by measuring possible confounds to rule them in or out. How can we study the human brain? Although functional neuroimaging, electroencelphalography/mag- Methods for studying human brain function can be organized according netoencelphalography (EEG/MEG) and single-cell recordings are some- to the kinds of mechanistic insights that each technique provides. As times criticized as being purely correlative and therefore uninformative shown in Table 1 the first characteristic is the level of mechanism cap- about mechanism, that criticism is only partly accurate. When psycho- tured by the method. Mechanisms range from the molecular level (neu- logical processes are experimentally manipulated by presenting a certain rotransmitters and receptors) to large-scale networks (the dynamic kind of stimulus and/or engaging the subject in a task, we can infer integration and coordination of different functional areas of the brain). that any reliably elicited brain activity was caused by performing these Although this distinction is related to physical scale, it does not depend psychological functions. We cannot, however, infer with confidence on the method’s spatial resolution per se. For example, positron emis- that the observed brain activity is causally responsible for the psycho- sion tomography (PET) using neurotransmitter ligands measures logical process under study. Despite this limitation (which is shared by molecular mechanisms, even though its spatial resolution is on the order neuronal recordings in non-human animals), neuroimaging studies 1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 2Center for Neuroscience & Society, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. 00 MONTH 2015 | VOL 000 | NATURE | 1 RESEARCH REVIEW Table 1 | An overview of the levels of analysis and levels of causal inference afforded by different human neuroscience methods Level of mechanism Molecules Cells Populations NETWORKS Strength of causal Purely observational Genetic associations with Structural morphometry N Resting functional evidence (associations do not behaviour, brain function or correlated with psychological connectivity (fMRI, necessarily imply causal brain structure traits EEG/MEG) or structural relations between mind Postmortem studies of gene connectivity (sMRI, DTI) and brain) expression correlated with psychological traits Correlations of MRI spectroscopy or PET ligand imaging with psychological traits Manipulate psychological Task modulation studies using Intracerebral Task activation studies N Task-based functional process and observe brain PET with neurotransmitter recording in (PET, fMRI, EEG/MEG) connectivity (fMRI, (neural measures may be ligands or MRI spectroscopy surgical patients Representational analysis EEG/MEG) epiphenomenal) (fMRI, EEG/MEG) Computational neuroimaging (fMRI, EEG/MEG) Manipulate brain and Pharmacological manipulation Direct brain Focal cortical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distance Learning Program Anatomy of the Human Brain/Sheep Brain Dissection
    Distance Learning Program Anatomy of the Human Brain/Sheep Brain Dissection This guide is for middle and high school students participating in AIMS Anatomy of the Human Brain and Sheep Brain Dissections. Programs will be presented by an AIMS Anatomy Specialist. In this activity students will become more familiar with the anatomical structures of the human brain by observing, studying, and examining human specimens. The primary focus is on the anatomy, function, and pathology. Those students participating in Sheep Brain Dissections will have the opportunity to dissect and compare anatomical structures. At the end of this document, you will find anatomical diagrams, vocabulary review, and pre/post tests for your students. The following topics will be covered: 1. The neurons and supporting cells of the nervous system 2. Organization of the nervous system (the central and peripheral nervous systems) 4. Protective coverings of the brain 5. Brain Anatomy, including cerebral hemispheres, cerebellum and brain stem 6. Spinal Cord Anatomy 7. Cranial and spinal nerves Objectives: The student will be able to: 1. Define the selected terms associated with the human brain and spinal cord; 2. Identify the protective structures of the brain; 3. Identify the four lobes of the brain; 4. Explain the correlation between brain surface area, structure and brain function. 5. Discuss common neurological disorders and treatments. 6. Describe the effects of drug and alcohol on the brain. 7. Correctly label a diagram of the human brain National Science Education
    [Show full text]
  • GLOSSARY Glossary Adapted with Permission from R
    GLOSSARY Glossary adapted with permission from R. Kalb (ed.) Multiple Sclerosis: The Questions You Have: The Answers You Need (5th ed.) New York: Demos Medical Publishing, 2012. This glossary is available in its entirety (as well as additional MS terms) online at nationalMSsociety.org/glossary. 106 | KNOWLEDGE IS POWER 106 | KNOWLEDGE IS POWER Americans with Disabilities Act Blood-brain barrier (ADA) A semi-permeable cell layer around The first comprehensive legislation blood vessels in the brain and spinal to prohibit discrimination on the cord that prevents large molecules, basis of disability. The ADA (passed immune cells, and potentially in 1990) guarantees full participation damaging substances and disease- in society to people with disabilities. causing organisms (e.g., viruses) from The four areas of social activity passing out of the blood stream into the covered by the ADA are employment; central nervous system (brain, spinal public services and accommodations; cord and optic nerves). A break in the transportation; and communications blood-brain barrier may underlie the Autoimmune(e.g., telephone disease services). Centraldisease process nervous in system MS. A process in which the body’s immune The part of the nervous system that system causes illness by mistakenly includes the brain, optic nerves, and attacking healthy cells, organs or tissues Cerebrospinalspinal cord. fluid (CSF) in the body that are essential for good health. In multiple sclerosis, the specific antigen — or target — that the immune A watery, colorless, clear fluid that cells are sensitized to attack remains bathes and protects the brain and unknown, which is why MS is considered spinal cord.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Representation of Human Cortical Networks for Subject and Population-Level Connectomic Visualization
    NeuroImage 60 (2012) 1340–1351 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg Full Length Articles Circular representation of human cortical networks for subject and population-level connectomic visualization Andrei Irimia ⁎, Micah C. Chambers, Carinna M. Torgerson, John D. Van Horn Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles E Young Drive South, Suite 225, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA article info abstract Article history: Cortical network architecture has predominantly been investigated visually using graph theory representa- Received 13 September 2011 tions. In the context of human connectomics, such representations are not however always satisfactory Revised 19 January 2012 because canonical methods for vertex–edge relationship representation do not always offer optimal insight Accepted 20 January 2012 regarding functional and structural neural connectivity. This article introduces an innovative framework for Available online 28 January 2012 the depiction of human connectomics by employing a circular visualization method which is highly suitable to the exploration of central nervous system architecture. This type of representation, which we name a Keywords: ‘ ’ Connectomics connectogram , has the capability of classifying neuroconnectivity relationships intuitively and elegantly. A Cortical network multimodal protocol for MRI/DTI neuroimaging data acquisition is here combined with automatic image seg- DTI mentation to (1) extract cortical and non-cortical anatomical structures, (2) calculate associated volumetrics MRI and morphometrics, and (3) determine patient-specific connectivity profiles to generate subject-level and Neuroimaging population-level connectograms. The scalability of our approach is demonstrated for a population of 50 adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Brain Anatomy
    Chapter 2 Basic Brain Anatomy Where this icon appears, visit The Brain http://go.jblearning.com/ManascoCWS to view the corresponding video. The average weight of an adult human brain is about 3 pounds. That is about the weight of a single small To understand how a part of the brain is disordered by cantaloupe or six grapefruits. If a human brain was damage or disease, speech-language pathologists must placed on a tray, it would look like a pretty unim- first know a few facts about the anatomy of the brain pressive mass of gray lumpy tissue (Luria, 1973). In in general and how a normal and healthy brain func- fact, for most of history the brain was thought to be tions. Readers can use the anatomy presented here as an utterly useless piece of flesh housed in the skull. a reference, review, and jumping off point to under- The Egyptians believed that the heart was the seat standing the consequences of damage to the structures of human intelligence, and as such, the brain was discussed. This chapter begins with the big picture promptly removed during mummification. In his and works down into the specifics of brain anatomy. essay On Sleep and Sleeplessness, Aristotle argued that the brain is a complex cooling mechanism for our bodies that works primarily to help cool and The Central Nervous condense water vapors rising in our bodies (Aristo- tle, republished 2011). He also established a strong System argument in this same essay for why infants should not drink wine. The basis for this argument was that The nervous system is divided into two major sec- infants already have Central nervous tions: the central nervous system and the peripheral too much moisture system The brain and nervous system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Brain Hemisphere Controls the Left Side of the Body and the Left What Makes the Human Brain Unique Is Its Size
    About the brain Cerebrum (also known as the The brain is made up of around 100 billion nerve cells - each one cerebral cortex or forebrain) is connected to another 10,000. This means that, in total, we The cerebrum is the largest part of the brain. It is split in to two have around 1,000 trillion connections in our brains. (This would ‘halves’ of roughly equal size called hemispheres. The two be written as 1,000,000,000,000,000). These are ultimately hemispheres, the left and right, are joined together by a bundle responsible for who we are. Our brains control the decisions we of nerve fibres called the corpus callosum. The right make, the way we learn, move, and how we feel. The human brain hemisphere controls the left side of the body and the left What makes the human brain unique is its size. Our brains have a hemisphere controls the right side of the body. The cerebrum is larger cerebral cortex, or cerebrum, relative to the rest of the The human brain is the centre of our nervous further divided in to four lobes: frontal, parietal, occipital, and brain than any other animal. (See the Cerebrum section of this temporal, which have different functions. system. It is the most complex organ in our fact sheet for further information.) This enables us to have abilities The frontal lobe body and is responsible for everything we do - such as complex language, problem-solving and self-control. The frontal lobe is located at the front of the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience
    NEUROSCIENCE SCIENCE OF THE BRAIN AN INTRODUCTION FOR YOUNG STUDENTS British Neuroscience Association European Dana Alliance for the Brain Neuroscience: the Science of the Brain 1 The Nervous System P2 2 Neurons and the Action Potential P4 3 Chemical Messengers P7 4 Drugs and the Brain P9 5 Touch and Pain P11 6 Vision P14 Inside our heads, weighing about 1.5 kg, is an astonishing living organ consisting of 7 Movement P19 billions of tiny cells. It enables us to sense the world around us, to think and to talk. The human brain is the most complex organ of the body, and arguably the most 8 The Developing P22 complex thing on earth. This booklet is an introduction for young students. Nervous System In this booklet, we describe what we know about how the brain works and how much 9 Dyslexia P25 there still is to learn. Its study involves scientists and medical doctors from many disciplines, ranging from molecular biology through to experimental psychology, as well as the disciplines of anatomy, physiology and pharmacology. Their shared 10 Plasticity P27 interest has led to a new discipline called neuroscience - the science of the brain. 11 Learning and Memory P30 The brain described in our booklet can do a lot but not everything. It has nerve cells - its building blocks - and these are connected together in networks. These 12 Stress P35 networks are in a constant state of electrical and chemical activity. The brain we describe can see and feel. It can sense pain and its chemical tricks help control the uncomfortable effects of pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Expansion of Connectivity Between Multimodal Association Areas in the Human Brain Compared with Chimpanzees,” by Dirk Jan Ardesch, Lianne H
    Correction NEUROSCIENCE Correction for “Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees,” by Dirk Jan Ardesch, Lianne H. Scholtens, Longchuan Li, Todd M. Preuss, James K. Rilling, and Martijn P. van den Heuvel, which was first published March 18, 2019; 10.1073/pnas.1818512116 (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:7101–7106). The authors wish to note the following: “No new MRI data were acquired for this study. All chimpanzee MRIs were obtained from a data archive of scans obtained prior to the 2015 implementation of US Fish and Wildlife Service and National Institutes of Health regulations governing research with chimpanzees. All the scans reported in this publication were completed by the end of 2012. All chimpanzee MRI scans are part of the National Chimpanzee Brain Resource (http://www.chimpanzeebrain.org).” Published under the PNAS license. Published online April 29, 2019. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1906107116 9680 | PNAS | May 7, 2019 | vol. 116 | no. 19 www.pnas.org Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees Dirk Jan Ardescha, Lianne H. Scholtensa, Longchuan Lib, Todd M. Preussc,d,e, James K. Rillingc,d,f,g,h, and Martijn P. van den Heuvela,i,1 aConnectome Lab, Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; bMarcus Autism Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329; cYerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329; dCenter for Translational Social Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329; eDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307; fDepartment of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; gSilvio O.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Cognitive Deficits After Traumatic Brain Injury Predict Alzheimer's
    GeroScience (2020) 42:1411–1429 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-020-00245-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Acute cognitive deficits after traumatic brain injury predict Alzheimer’s disease-like degradation of the human default mode network Andrei Irimia & Alexander S. Maher & Nikhil N. Chaudhari & Nahian F. Chowdhury & Elliot B. Jacobs & the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Received: 9 June 2020 /Accepted: 29 July 2020 /Published online: 2 August 2020 # American Aging Association 2020 Abstract Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Alzheimer’s are leveraged to study the extent to which geriatric mild disease (AD) are prominent neurological conditions whose TBI(mTBI)canleadtoAD-like alteration of resting-state neural and cognitive commonalities are poorly understood. activity in the default mode network (DMN). This network The extent of TBI-related neurophysiological abnormali- is found to contain modules whose extent of AD-like, ties has been hypothesized to reflect AD-like neurodegen- posttraumatic degradation can be accurately prognosticat- eration because TBI can increase vulnerability to AD. ed based on the acute cognitive deficits of geriatric mTBI However, it remains challenging to prognosticate AD risk patients with cerebral microbleeds. Aside from establish- partly because the functional relationship between acute ing a predictive physiological association between geriatric posttraumatic sequelae and chronic AD-like degradation mTBI, cognitive impairment, and AD-like functional deg- remains elusive. Here, functional magnetic resonance im- radation, these findings advance the goal of acutely fore- aging (fMRI), network theory, and machine learning (ML) casting mTBI patients’ chronic deviations from normality along AD-like functional trajectories. The association of Andrei Irimia and Alexander S. Maher contributed equally to this geriatric mTBI with AD-like changes in functional brain work.
    [Show full text]
  • Patient-Tailored Connectomics Visualization for the Assessment of White Matter Atrophy in Traumatic Brain Injury
    Patient-Tailored Connectomics Visualization for the Assessment of White Matter Atrophy in Traumatic Brain Injury The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Irimia, Andrei, Micah C. Chambers, Carinna M. Torgerson, Maria Filippou, David A. Hovda, Jeffry R. Alger, Guido Gerig, et al. 2012. Patient-tailored connectomics visualization for the assessment of white matter atrophy in traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Neurology 3:10. Published Version doi://10.3389/fneur.2012.00010 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8462352 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA METHODS ARTICLE published: 06 February 2012 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2012.00010 Patient-tailored connectomics visualization for the assessment of white matter atrophy in traumatic brain injury Andrei Irimia1, Micah C. Chambers 1, Carinna M.Torgerson1, Maria Filippou 2, David A. Hovda2, Jeffry R. Alger 3, Guido Gerig 4, Arthur W.Toga1, Paul M. Vespa2, Ron Kikinis 5 and John D. Van Horn1* 1 Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2 Brain Injury Research Center, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA 3 Department of Radiology, David
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Comparisons Teacher's Guide
    Teacher’s Guide Written by Leslie Miller, Ph.D., Barbara Tharp, M.S., Judith Dresden, M.S., Katherine Taber, Ph.D., Karen Kabnick, Ph.D., and Nancy Moreno, Ph.D. © 2015 Baylor College of Medicine TEACHER’S GUIDE Written by Leslie Miller, Ph.D., Barbara Tharp, M.S., Judith Dresden, M.S. Katherine Taber, Ph.D., Karen Kabnick, Ph.D., and Nancy Moreno, Ph.D. BioEd Teacher Resources from the Center for Educational Outreach Baylor College of Medicine ISBN: 978-1-888997-98-9 © 2015 Baylor College of Medicine © 2015 Baylor College of Medicine. All rights reserved. Fifth edition. First edition published 1992. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 978-1-888997-98-9 Teacher Resources from the Center for Educational Outreach at Baylor College of Medicine. The mark “BioEd” is a service mark of Baylor College of Medicine. The marks “BrainLink” and “NeuroExplorers” are registered trademarks of Baylor College of Medicine. No part of this book may be reproduced by any mechanical, photographic or electronic process, or in the form of an audio recording, nor may it be stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or otherwise copied for public or private use without prior written permission of the publisher, except for classroom use. The activities described in this book are intended for school-age children under direct supervision of adults. The authors, Baylor College of Medicine and the publisher cannot be responsible for any accidents or injuries that may result from conduct of the activities, from not specifically following directions, or from ignoring cautions contained in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • White Matter Dissection and Structural Connectivity of the Human Vertical
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN White matter dissection and structural connectivity of the human vertical occipital fasciculus to link vision-associated brain cortex Tatsuya Jitsuishi1, Seiichiro Hirono2, Tatsuya Yamamoto1,3, Keiko Kitajo1, Yasuo Iwadate2 & Atsushi Yamaguchi1* The vertical occipital fasciculus (VOF) is an association fber tract coursing vertically at the posterolateral corner of the brain. It is re-evaluated as a major fber tract to link the dorsal and ventral visual stream. Although previous tractography studies showed the VOF’s cortical projections fall in the dorsal and ventral visual areas, the post-mortem dissection study for the validation remains limited. First, to validate the previous tractography data, we here performed the white matter dissection in post-mortem brains and demonstrated the VOF’s fber bundles coursing between the V3A/B areas and the posterior fusiform gyrus. Secondly, we analyzed the VOF’s structural connectivity with difusion tractography to link vision-associated cortical areas of the HCP MMP1.0 atlas, an updated map of the human cerebral cortex. Based on the criteria the VOF courses laterally to the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) and craniocaudally at the posterolateral corner of the brain, we reconstructed the VOF’s fber tracts and found the widespread projections to the visual cortex. These fndings could suggest a crucial role of VOF in integrating visual information to link the broad visual cortex as well as in connecting the dual visual stream. Te VOF is the fber tract that courses vertically at the posterolateral corner of the brain. Te VOF was histori- cally described in monkey by Wernicke1 and then in human by Obersteiner2.
    [Show full text]
  • Disconnectome of the Migraine Brain: a “Connectopathy”
    Silvestro et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2021) 22:102 The Journal of Headache https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01315-6 and Pain RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Disconnectome of the migraine brain: a “connectopathy” model Marcello Silvestro1,2†, Alessandro Tessitore1,2†, Giuseppina Caiazzo1,2, Fabrizio Scotto di Clemente1,2,3, Francesca Trojsi1,2, Mario Cirillo1, Fabrizio Esposito1,2, Gioacchino Tedeschi1,2,3 and Antonio Russo1,2,3* Abstract Background: In the past decades a plethora of studies has been conducted to explore resting-state functional connectivity (RS-FC) of the brain networks in migraine with conflicting results probably due to the variability and susceptibility of signal fluctuations across the course of RS-FC scan. On the other hand, the structural substrates enabling the functional communications among the brain connectome, characterized by higher stability and reproducibility, have not been widely investigated in migraine by means of graph analysis approach. We hypothesize a rearrangement of the brain connectome with an increase of both strength and density of connections between cortical areas specifically involved in pain perception, processing and modulation in migraine patients. Moreover, such connectome rearrangement, inducing an imbalance between the competing parameters of network efficiency and segregation, may underpin a mismatch between energy resources and demand representing the neuronal correlate of the energetically dysfunctional migraine brain. Methods: We investigated, using diffusion-weighted MRI imaging tractography-based graph analysis, the graph- topological indices of the brain “connectome”, a set of grey matter regions (nodes) structurally connected by white matter paths (edges) in 94 patients with migraine without aura compared to 91 healthy controls.
    [Show full text]