National Transportation Safety Board

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Transportation Safety Board PB95-910406 NTSB/AAR-95/06 DCA95MA020 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT UNCONTROLLED COLLISION WITH TERRAIN AIR TRANSPORT INTERNATIONAL DOUGLAS DC-8-63, N782AL KANSAS CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI FEBRUARY 16,199s 6538/i The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency dedicated to promoting aviation, railroad, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety. Established in 1967, the agency is mandated by Congress through the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to investigate transportation accidents, determine the probable causes of the accidents, issue safety recommendations, study transportation safety issues, and evaluate the safety effectiveness of government agencies involved in transportation. The Safety Board makes public its actions and decisions through accident reports, safety studies, special investigation reports, safety recommendations, and statistical reviews. Information about available publications may be obtained by contacting: National Transportation Safety Board Public Inquiries Section, RE-51 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 (202)382-6735 Safety Board publications may be purchased, by individual copy or by subscription, from: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 (703)487-4600 NTSBIAAR-95106 PB95-910406 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT UNCONTROLLED COLLISION WITH TERRAIN AIR TRANSPORT INTERNATIONAL DOUGLAS DC-8-63, N782AL KANSAS CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI FEBRUARY 16,1995 Adopted: August 30,1995 Notation 6538A Abstract: This report explains the accident involving an Air Transport International DC- 8-63, which was destroyed by ground impact and fire during an attempted takeoff at Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Missouri, on February 16, 1995. Safety issues in the report include three-engine takeoff training and procedures, flightcrew fatigue, company crew assignment decisionmaking, and Federal Aviation Administration oversight of the company. Safety recommendations concerning these issues were made to the Federal Aviation Administration and Air Transport International. 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . vi 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION 1.1 History of Flight.................................................................................... 1 1.2 Injuries to Persons................................................................................. 25 1.3 Damage to Airplane .............................................................................. 25 1.4 Other Damage ....................................................................................... 25 1.5 Personnel Information........................................................................... 25 1.51 The Captain .......................................................................................... 25 1.52 The First Officer ................................................................................... 29 1.53 The Flight Engineer .............................................................................. 30 1.6 Airplane Information............................................................................. 31 1.6.1 General Maintenance History................................................................ 31 1.6.2 Powerplants .......................................................................................... 32 1.6.3 Rudder System Description................................................................... 32 1.7 Meteorological Information .................................................................. 32 1.8 Aids to Navigation ................................................................................ 33 1.9 Communications ................................................................................... 33 1.10 Aerodrome Information......................................................................... 33 1.11 Flight Recorders.................................................................................... 33 1.11.1 General ................................................................................................. 33 1.11.2 Sound Spectrum Analysis ..................................................................... 34 1.12 Wreckage and Impact Information ........................................................ 34 1.12.1 General Debris Field Description .......................................................... 34 1.12.2 Fuselage................................................................................................ 38 1.12.3 Wings ................................................................................................... 38 1.12.4 Empennage ........................................................................................... 38 1.125 Engines ................................................................................................. 39 1.12.5.1 Engine No. 2 ......................................................................................... 39 1.12.5.2 Engine No. 3 ......................................................................................... 39 1.12.5.3 Engine No. 4 ......................................................................................... 40 1.12.6 Fuel Samples......................................................................................... 40 1.12.7 Landing Gear ........................................................................................ 41 1.12.8 Hydraulic System................................................................................... 41 1.12.9 Rudder System...................................................................................... 41 1.12.10 Other Flight Control Systems ................................................................ 42 1.12.11 Cockpit Documentation ........................................................................ 42 . 111 1.13 Medical and Pathological Information .................................................. 43 1.13.1 General ................................................................................................. 43 1.13.2 Crew Rest Aspects ................................................................................ 44 1.14 Fire ....................................................................................................... 46 1.15 Survival Aspects ................................................................................... 46 1.16 Tests and Research ............................................................................... 46 1.16.1 Three-Engine Takeoff Procedural Comparison ..................................... 46 1.16.2 Simulator Experiment ........................................................................... 48 1.17 Organizational and Management Information ....................................... 49 1.17.1 General ................................................................................................. 49 1.17.2 Flightcrew Pairing................................................................................. 50 1.17.3 Captain Upgrade ................................................................................... 50 1.17.4 Company Authorization for Three-engine Takeoffs ............................. 50 1.17.5 Department of Defense (DOD) ............................................................. 51 1.17.6 FAA Oversight and Surveillance........................................................... 52 1.17.7 FAA National Aviation Safety Inspection Program (NASIP) ................ 54 1.17.8 Previous ATI Accidents ........................................................................ 55 1.18 Additional Information.......................................................................... 56 1.18.1 “V” Speeds and Vmcg Calculation........................................................ 56 2. ANALYSIS 2.1 General ................................................................................................. 59 2.2 Airplane Systems................................................................................... 60 2.2.1 Brakes, Landing Gear and Tires.............................................................. 60 2.2.2 Flight Controls......................................................................................... 60 2.3 ATI Operational Supervision ................................................................ 61 2.3.1 Flightcrew Background ......................................................................... 61 2.3 2 Flightcrew Assignment ......................................................................... 62 2.4 Flightcrew Performance ........................................................................ 63 2.4.1 Engine Start .......................................................................................... 63 2.4.2 Landing Curfew .................................................................................... 63 2.4.3 Performance Calculations ..................................................................... 64 2.4.4 Taxi and Takeoff................................................................................... 64 2.4.4.1 Three-Engine Takeoff Procedure .......................................................... 68 2.5 Flightcrew Training............................................................................... 70 2.5.1 Three-Engine Takeoff Training ............................................................. 70 2.5.2
Recommended publications
  • CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK
    CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK-HFM Tupolev Tu-134 CSA -large OK on fin 91 2 £3 CC211 G-31-962 HP Jetstream 31 American eagle 92 2 £1 CC368 N4213X Douglas DC-6 Northern Air Cargo 88 4 £2 CC373 G-BFPV C-47 ex Spanish AF T3-45/744-45 78 1 £4 CC446 G31-862 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC487 CS-TKC Boeing 737-300 Air Columbus 93 3 £2 CC489 PT-OKF DHC8/300 TABA 93 2 £2 CC510 G-BLRT Short SD-360 ex Air Business 87 1 £2 CC567 N400RG Boeing 727 89 1 £2 CC573 G31-813 HP Jetstream 31 white 88 1 £1 CC574 N5073L Boeing 727 84 1 £2 CC595 G-BEKG HS 748 87 2 £2 CC603 N727KS Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC608 N331QQ HP Jetstream 31 white 88 2 £1 CC610 D-BERT DHC8 Contactair c/s 88 5 £1 CC636 C-FBIP HP Jetstream 31 white 88 3 £1 CC650 HZ-DG1 Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC732 D-CDIC SAAB SF-340 Delta Air 89 1 £2 CC735 C-FAMK HP Jetstream 31 Canadian partner/Air Toronto 89 1 £2 CC738 TC-VAB Boeing 737 Sultan Air 93 1 £2 CC760 G31-841 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC762 C-GDBR HP Jetstream 31 Air Toronto 89 3 £1 CC821 G-DVON DH Devon C.2 RAF c/s VP955 89 1 £1 CC824 G-OOOH Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 3 £1 CC826 VT-EPW Boeing 747-300 Air India 89 3 £1 CC834 G-OOOA Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 4 £1 CC876 G-BHHU Short SD-330 89 3 £1 CC901 9H-ABE Boeing 737 Air Malta 88 2 £1 CC911 EC-ECR Boeing 737-300 Air Europa 89 3 £1 CC922 G-BKTN HP Jetstream 31 Euroflite 84 4 £1 CC924 I-ATSA Cessna 650 Aerotaxisud 89 3 £1 CC936 C-GCPG Douglas DC-10 Canadian 87 3 £1 CC940 G-BSMY HP Jetstream 31 Pan Am Express 90 2 £2 CC945 7T-VHG Lockheed C-130H Air Algerie
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Involvement in the 1990-91 Gulf War Through the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Charles Imbriani
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 Civilian Involvement in the 1990-91 Gulf War Through the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Charles Imbriani Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE CIVILIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 1990-91 GULF WAR THROUGH THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET By CHARLES IMBRIANI A Dissertation submitted to the Interdisciplinary Program in the Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2012 Charles Imbriani defended this dissertation on October 4, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: Peter Garretson Professor Directing Dissertation Jonathan Grant University Representative Dennis Moore Committee Member Irene Zanini-Cordi Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to Fred (Freddie) Bissert 1935-2012. I first met Freddie over forty years ago when I stared working for Pan American World Airways in New York. It was twenty-two year later, still with Pan Am, when I took a position as ramp operations trainer; and Freddie was assigned to teach me the tools of the trade. In 1989 while in Berlin for training, Freddie and I witnessed the abandoning of the guard towers along the Berlin Wall by the East Germans. We didn’t realize it then, but we were witnessing the beginning of the end of the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Excursion During Landing, Delta Air Lines Flight 1086, Boeing MD-88, N909DL, New York, New York, March 5, 2015
    Runway Excursion During Landing Delta Air Lines Flight 1086 Boeing MD-88, N909DL New York, New York March 5, 2015 Accident Report NTSB/AAR-16/02 National PB2016-104166 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/AAR-16/02 PB2016-104166 Notation 8780 Adopted September 13, 2016 Aircraft Accident Report Runway Excursion During Landing Delta Air Lines Flight 1086 Boeing MD-88, N909DL New York, New York March 5, 2015 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2016. Runway Excursion During Landing, Delta Air Lines Flight 1086, Boeing MD-88, N909DL, New York, New York, March 5, 2015. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-16/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: This report discusses the March 5, 2015, accident in which Delta Air Lines flight 1086, a Boeing MD-88 airplane, N909DL, was landing on runway 13 at LaGuardia Airport, New York, New York, when it departed the left side of the runway, contacted the airport perimeter fence, and came to rest with the airplane’s nose on an embankment next to Flushing Bay. The 2 pilots, 3 flight attendants, and 98 of the 127 passengers were not injured; the other 29 passengers received minor injuries. The airplane was substantially damaged. Safety issues discussed in the report relate to the use of excessive engine reverse thrust and rudder blanking on MD-80 series airplanes, the subjective nature of braking action reports, the lack of procedures for crew communications during an emergency or a non-normal event without operative communication systems, inaccurate passenger counts provided to emergency responders following an accident, and unclear policies regarding runway friction measurements and runway condition reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Jetblue Honors Public Servants for Inspiring Humanity
    www.MetroAirportNews.com Serving the Airport Workforce and Local Communities June 2017 research to create international awareness for INSIDE THIS ISSUE neuroblastoma. Last year’s event raised $123,000. All in attendance received a special treat, a first glimpse at JetBlue’s newest special livery — “Blue Finest” — dedicated to New York City’s more than 36,000 officers. Twenty three teams, consisting of nearly 300 participants, partici- pated in timed trials to pull “Blue Finest,” an Airbus 320 aircraft, 100 feet in the fastest amount of time to raise funds for the J-A-C-K Foundation. Participants were among the first to view this aircraft adorned with the NYPD flag, badge and shield. “Blue Finest” will join JetBlue’s fleet flying FOD Clean Up Event at JFK throughout the airline’s network, currently 101 Page 2 JetBlue Honors Public Servants cities and growing. The aircraft honoring the NYPD joins JetBlue’s exclusive legion of ser- for Inspiring Humanity vice-focused aircraft including “Blue Bravest” JetBlue Debuts ‘Blue Finest’ Aircraft dedicated to the FDNY, “Vets in Blue” honoring veterans past and present and “Bluemanity” - a Dedicated to the New York Police Department tribute to all JetBlue crewmembers who bring JetBlue has a long history of supporting those department competed against teams including the airline’s mission of inspiring humanity to who serve their communities. Today public ser- JetBlue crewmembers and members from local life every day. vants from New York and abroad joined forces authorities including the NYPD and FDNY to “As New York’s Hometown Airline, support- for a good cause.
    [Show full text]
  • New Airlines Are Mailing National Headlines the Civil Aeronautics Board Has Approved 109 Helicopters
    f=*i£^am am rotp page two Industry notes New airlines are mailing national headlines The Civil Aeronautics Board has approved 109 helicopters. The helicopter shuttle flights percent below standard fares charged by major the proposed merger of Republic Airlines and will be offered by a company called New York commercial airlines. Hughes Air West. Republic, a recent product of Air which has no connection with the New York Loftliedr bypassed air traffic treaties by the Board’s generally favorable policy toward Air that will start jetliner shuttle flights between staying out of the International Air Traffic mergers, was created by the union of North LaGuardia and Washington National on Decem­ Association (lATA) and by using Luxembourg Central Airlines and Southern Airways. ber 14. as its European base. The Republic merger with Air West will The latter New York Air is a subsidiary of American students made it their carrier for create the country’s 11th largest carrier in terms Texas Air Corp., the recently formed parent summers abroad, and in Europe Greeks, Italians, of revenue passenger miles. Presidential approval holding company of Texas International Airlines. Germans, Frenchmen and Dutchmen flocked to was not required because there won’t be a formal The CAB has tentatively granted a certificate to Luxembourg to use the airline, which once ran transfer of route certificates. Hughes Air West the Texas Air subsidiary which was founded to as many as 25 flights a week each way. will become a subsidiary airline, named Republic compete in the New York-Washington shuttle The airline made a stopover at Keflavik Air­ Airlines West.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Aviation Administration Curriculum Guide for Aviation
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration FAA Headquarters Aviation Education Division FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CURRICULUM GUIDE FOR AVIATION MAGNET SCHOOLS PROGRAMS Prepared by Dr. Mervin K. Strickler, Jr. AHT-100-1-94 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Mervin K. Strickler, Jr., a native of Pennsylvania, graduated from Clarion State University. In 1951 he received his doctorate from Stanford University with specialization in aviation higher education. During his long and distinguished career he served as Director, USAF-Civil Air Patrol Aviation Education from 1951 to 1960, and as Director of the Federal Aviation Administration's Aviation Education Program from 1960 to 1979. From 1973 to 1979, he also worked with the Commonwealth of Independent States (then Soviet Union) as the FAA's representative for scientific and technical aviation education and training for all facets of civil aviation. He continues today as an international consultant on aviation education matters to industry, government, and all levels of education. Dr. Strickler's many publications and papers are included in libraries around the world. He is frequently called upon to speak at major aviation events and is well known nationally and internationally for his expertise in aviation education. PREFACE The Federal Aviation Administration's current interests, activities, projects and programs in aviation education represent and stem from a continuation and expansion of programs and similar initiatives of its predecessor organizations. Present programs are a result of the most recent FAA Administrator's Task Force Report on Aviation Education completed in 1990. The Report identified over fifty aviation education initiatives as appropriate to support the agency's objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPTAIN CURTIS E. FARLEY Internationally Qualified. Gainesville, VA 20155 (Close to Washington Dulles [IAD] Airport) Availab
    CAPTAIN CURTIS E. FARLEY Internationally qualified. Gainesville, VA 20155 (Close to Washington Dulles [IAD] Airport) Available anytime, day or night, holidays, etc. Contract or Permanent Be not afraid to call, anytime! Revised 4 April 2011 CERTIFICATES AND RATINGS Airline Transport Pilot Single, Multi-Engine Land Commercial Recurrent 2011 in the Citation V. CJ, CJ1, CJ2, CJ3, CE-525(S) Typed crew and single pilot. Over 400 hours of which over 300 hours is Single Pilot. Presently current in all landings, day and night, Instrument approaches and recent 299 line check. I have worked as a Trng. Captain on the CJ recently. Recent contract tour in the Mideast in a CJ2. Just returned (Easter Weekend 2009) from single pilot roundtrip contract flight on a CJ3 to Costa Rica from Florida. Citation CE-560, (Citation V) type. 1000 hours in 500 series aircraft Citation CE-500 Type Citation CE-750 Type 1000 hours Left Seat Boeing B-727 Type 21,000 hours Airbus A300/310 600 Type (273 pax)… 10,000 hours Saberliner 80 SC Type 200 hours Flight Engineer Turbo-Prop Flight Engineer Turbo-Jet First Officer Turbo Jet and Turbo Prop USAF Functional Test Pilot Vampire Jet Fighter Typed Venom Jet Fighter Typed Venom/Vampire Instructor Mig-15 Series Fighters Typed Mig-17 Series Fighters Typed Low Altitude Acrobatic Waivers for Venom and MIG-17 Fighters at Air shows. • International experienced in the Caribbean and Latin America in addition to domestic flying. • Just returned from roundtrip contract flight to Costa Rica in a CJ3, single pilot. • Have just returned from the Mideast, flying a CJ2 for several months for VIP’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Nyc to Mumbai Direct Flight
    Nyc To Mumbai Direct Flight Value-added Kelley outstripped intelligently. Brett is unimpeached and charred lowest while fibrous Ikey tew and quintupling. Sometimes arctic Myles jargonizing her insolations thenceforth, but sedimentary Winfred dizzies scenically or resuscitating othergates. Air India Flights New York JFK to Mumbai BOM from. English content has direct from nyc favours pizzas with internationally trusted, please enter a promenade constructed by utilizing your internet behaviour of. India without burning a wrath in our pocket. Looking out of your airlines. Delta Air Lines Flight DL24 from New York John F Kennedy International Airport JFK to Mumbai Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport BOM is not scheduled. Sorry, your booking could not be found. It spring back in 2006 that Delta Air Lines began its non-stop service from JFK in New York to Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport BOM in. Most of travelers traveling for individual discount codes are frequently asked us? Terms of your email address when you are particularly interested in my. The direct train connections. Book flights from Mumbai to New York Singapore Airlines. It is a direct flights were excellent and art, cafe madras coffee offers in place in one adult traveller per person. Cabin which we grumpy. Please provide the trump administration with newborn children, the degree to arrange a nyc to mumbai direct flight. Next journey of fell in advance should check our flight to mumbai direct service request is invalid characters from ewr airport is no dearth of. Though there are you see the bombay, we found as to mumbai flight to the airline is always to? Would you like to become a Flying Blue member? Book New York to Mumbai flight tickets at lowest price.
    [Show full text]
  • 363 Part 238—Contracts With
    Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice § 238.3 (2) The country where the alien was mented on Form I±420. The contracts born; with transportation lines referred to in (3) The country where the alien has a section 238(c) of the Act shall be made residence; or by the Commissioner on behalf of the (4) Any country willing to accept the government and shall be documented alien. on Form I±426. The contracts with (c) Contiguous territory and adjacent transportation lines desiring their pas- islands. Any alien ordered excluded who sengers to be preinspected at places boarded an aircraft or vessel in foreign outside the United States shall be contiguous territory or in any adjacent made by the Commissioner on behalf of island shall be deported to such foreign the government and shall be docu- contiguous territory or adjacent island mented on Form I±425; except that con- if the alien is a native, citizen, subject, tracts for irregularly operated charter or national of such foreign contiguous flights may be entered into by the Ex- territory or adjacent island, or if the ecutive Associate Commissioner for alien has a residence in such foreign Operations or an Immigration Officer contiguous territory or adjacent is- designated by the Executive Associate land. Otherwise, the alien shall be de- Commissioner for Operations and hav- ported, in the first instance, to the ing jurisdiction over the location country in which is located the port at where the inspection will take place. which the alien embarked for such for- [57 FR 59907, Dec. 17, 1992] eign contiguous territory or adjacent island.
    [Show full text]
  • RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty
    RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Press at the Time of This Writing, Air France Was the Lead Partner of New Airport News
    Vol. 37 No. 9 Serving New York Airports September 2015 JFK TWA FLIGHT CENTER HOTEL PLANS ANNOUNCED New York governor, Andrew Cuomo meeting space at JFK. Whether staying the announced plans for MCR Development’s night or simply exploring, international vis- proposed TWA Flight Center Hotel at JFK itors and New Yorkers alike will be able to Airport. experience the magic of the Jet Age in this The development is expected to guar- extraordinary mid-century icon.” antee the preservation of New York JFK’s According to MCR Development, its most iconic old terminal. plan ensures the complete rehabilitation of Tyler Morse, CEO of MCR Develop- the national landmark to its 1962 glory. The ment, said: “The TWA Flight Center Hotel new hotel structure, it says, is to be set back will celebrate and preserve Eero Saarinen’s from the terminal in a move designed to de- masterpiece, returning the landmark to its fer to the landmark. original glory and re-opening it to the pub- The plan includes the creation of an in- lic. novative museum focusing on New York as “The TWA Flight Center Hotel will be the birthplace of the Jet Age, the storied his- an economic engine and a world-class air- tory of TWA, and the Midcentury Modern port hotel, creating approximately 3,700 design movement. construction and permanent jobs, 505 new The construction company contracted to hotel rooms, and 40,000 square feet of build the new hotel is Turner Construction. Patrick Foye, Executive Director, Port Authority of NY&NJ, Melinda Katz, President of the Borough of Queens, Verdia Noel, Area Director, Council for Airport Opportunity, Linda Johnson, Port Authority of NY&NJ, John Perry, Executive Director, Council for Airport Opportunity.
    [Show full text]