DOCSLIB.ORG

THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR Also by A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR Also by A THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR Also by A. B. Murphy ASPECTIVAL USAGE IN RUSSIAN INlRODUCTION AND COMMENTARY TO SHOLOKHOV'S TlKHlY DON MIKHAIL ZOSHCHENKO: A Literary Project Also by G. R. Swain EASTERN EUROPE SINCE 1945 (co-author) THE ORIGINS OF THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR RUSSIAN SOCIAL DEMOCRACY AND THE LEGAL LABOUR MOVEMENT,1906-14 The Russian Civil War Documents from the Soviet Archives Edited by v. P. Butt Senior Scientific Collaborator Institute of Russian History Russian Academy of Sciences A. B. Murphy Professor Emeritus of Russian University of Ulster N. A. Myshov Senior Scientific Collaborator and ChiefArchivist Russian State Military Archive and G. R. Swain Professor ofHistory University of the West of England First published in Great Britain 1996 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-0-333-59319-6 ISBN 978-1-349-25026-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-25026-4 First published in the United States of America 1996 by ST. MARTIN'S PRESS, INC., Scholarly and Reference Division, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 ISBN 978-0-312-16337-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Russian civil war: documents from the Soviet archives / edited by V. P. Butt ... ret al.l p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-312-16337-2 (cloth) I. Soviet Union-History-Revolution, 1917-1921-Sources. I. Butt, V. P. DK265.A5372 1996 947.084'I-dc20 96-19904 CIP Selection, editorial matter and translation © V. P. Butt, A. B. Murphy, N. A. Myshov and G. R. Swain 1996 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WIP 9HE. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. 10987654321 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 96 Contents Introduction vii Glossary of Russian Terms xvi 1 The Directory 1 2 The Don Rebellion 45 3 The Kaleidoscope of War 82 4 The Labour Armies of the Soviet Republic 124 5 The Final Curtain 175 Index 207 v Introduction For historians of Russia interested in the twentieth century it was until recently traditional to include in the preface to any book a disclaimer about the problems caused by the closure of the Soviet archives. For historians of the Russian Civil War such comments were de rigueur. Thus over twenty-five years ago John Bradley wrote in The Civil War in Russia, 1917-20 (Batsford, 1975) that the Soviet Government's policy concerning the Russian archives meant 'nothing fresh and revealing can be expected from that source' (p. 7), while as late as 1990 Bruce Lincoln could bemoan in his Red Victory (Simon & Schuster, 1990) that 'parts of Russia's Civil War story will almost certainly never be told for the documents remain locked away in the Soviet archives' (p. 13). That has all changed. The opening of the Soviet archives in the years since Mikhail Gorbachev's term as President of the Soviet Union, and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union itself, have enabled scholars to gain new perspectives on the Russian Civil War. The Civil War was a rather strange episode in the historiography of twentieth-century Russia. It saw an unlikely degree of agreement between Western and Soviet scholars on its origins and the reasons for the Bolshevik triumph. Whereas on most aspects of Russian history in the twentieth cen­ tury Western and Soviet scholars took diametrically opposite views on how to interpret events, the Civil War period witnessed something quite different. Western and Soviet scholars were pretty much at one. Take, for example, Bruce Lincoln's Red Victory. He writes in the pre- face (p. 12): The Bolsheviks' desperate struggle to survive during the Russian Civil War shaped the Soviet system of government and dictated its future course. Only by placing all human and natural resources within reach at the service of a government that spoke in the name of the people but acted in the interest of the Communist Party did Lenin and his comrades defeat their enemies. These included soldiers from fourteen countries, the armed forces of nearly a dozen national groups that struggled to establish independent governments upon the lands that once had been part of the Russian Empire, and a half-dozen White armies that formed on Russia's frontiers between 1918 and 1920. To comprehend the Soviet Union of today, it is important to understand how the Bolsheviks tri­ umphed against such crushing odds and how that struggle shaped their vision of the future. vii Vlll Introduction Apart from the reference to the Communist Party, few Soviet scholars would have been unhappy with such a summary. Of course, there have been differences of interpretation. Evan Mawdsley has done much in his definitive study, The Russian Civil War (Allen & Unwin, 1987), to qualify the received wisdom on a number of issues. In particular he had debunked the myth of the fourteen interventionist powers (foreign intervention was half-hearted and ineffective); he had made clear that the Red Army won not simply as a result of its military skill, but because it was far bigger than the White armies; and he had reminded us that, more than the Reds winning the Civil War, the Whites lost it since they represented nothing but the old pre-revolutionary ruling elite. But, with the honourable exception of Mawdsley, the differences between historians tend to be nuances within the same broad approach. For most, the Civil War was a heroic period in Russian history, before things started to go wrong, as it were. The Civil War took place before the emergence of Stalin as leader of the Russian Communist Party and saw Trotsky playing the leading role on the Bolshevik side in both building the Red Army and marshalling it towards victory. Progressive opinion in the West and Soviet propaganda could therefore be at one. Among the points on which Western and Soviet scholars were agreed were the following. One, that the 'democratic' phase of the Civil War, over the summer of 1918, was a meaningless interlude; the only group cap­ able of defeating the Bolsheviks were the White generals. The Bolsheviks' democratic opponents, if referred to at all, were depicted as ineffectual idealists who could talk but not fight. The true Civil War was fought between the Bolsheviks, who represented progress, and reactionary White generals, who were supported in their attempt to restore the old regime by the rampant imperialist ambitions of almost every conceivable European and world power. Another point of agreement was that the Bolsheviks, partly through their exceptional propaganda but also through their pro­ gressive social policies, succeeded in winning the hearts and minds of the bulk of the Russian population. And finally, it was agreed that, if a little brutally, Trotsky succeeded in turning the Red Army from a rabble to an incomparable fighting force. All historians agree that, to paraphrase Bruce Lincoln, Russia's Civil War experience determined the framework within which the Russian peo­ ple thought and governed throughout the Soviet period; what the newly released documents on the Civil War reveal is that the events of 1918-22 reflected struggles and tensions in Russian society far more complex than the simple Red-White struggle of 'progress' versus 'reaction', and fore­ shadow all the horrors of the Stalin period. They remind us first that many Introduction IX of the Whites were not 'White' at all, and that the Civil War began as a war between the Bolsheviks and their socialist opponents - the 'peasant' socialist SRs (Socialist Revolutionaries) - who did not simply talk but created the People's Army which at times had the Red Army on the run and always held its own. They show how the antipathy towards peasant socialism led the Bolsheviks to be suspicious of Russia's entire rural population, making it tremendously difficult to adopt a social policy in the countryside which could win even lukewarm support. They show how this failing was linked to the Bolsheviks' essentially urban ideology, and how that ideology was central to Bolshevism. The first attempt at post-war reconstruction took place according to the dictates of Bolshevik ideology, and the firm conviction that world revolution was only a matter of months away. They show a regime founded on terror, and which relied on terror throughout the war. They show that while the Red Army was able to defeat the Whites, it was not the disciplined army of Bolshevik propaganda. Desertion, low morale and poor supplies dogged it at every level; and the much vaunted commissar system of political edu­ cation scarcely operated. Finally, they show us the limitations and other­ worldliness of the Bolsheviks' White opponents. THE COURSE OF THE WAR The Russian Civil War began the moment the Bolsheviks seized power on the night of 24-25 October 1917. Within a week forces loyal to Kerensky's Provisional Government tried to wrest power from the Bolsheviks at the Battle of Pulkovo Heights on the outskirts of Petrograd. Few, however, were keen for a fight and Lenin's promise to hold elections to the Con­ stituent Assembly and form a coalition administration with the Left SRs was sufficient to restore relative calm.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dissidents Versus Communists
    DISSIDENTS VERSUS COMMUNISTS An Examination of the Soviet Dissidence Movement Matthew Williams Professor Transchel History 419 May 12, 2016 Williams 1 On February 25, 1956, Nikita Khrushchev gave a speech to the Twentieth Congress and to the Communist Party stating that Joseph Stalin was responsible for all of the empire’s then-current issues. He also gave insight into the criminal actions performed by the man during his lifetime. This speech was called the “Secret Speech” as it was not publicized at first, but once word got out about the true nature of Stalin, people began to doubt everything they knew to be true. Khrushchev decreased the censorship and restrictions on people and also freed millions of political prisoners from Gulags, beginning what would come to be referred to as the “thaw”. Many people had practically worshipped Stalin and knew him to represent the Communist party’s creed of infallibility. The tarnishing of his image led many people to seriously doubt the capabilities of the party.1 As truths came out and people began to discuss issues, there was increasing dissatisfaction with the Communist Party and a community of dissenters was born. This community of dissenters would ultimately keep the fight for freedom going long after the end of the thaw era, until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. This paper will examine the dissent movement, from its roots in the end of the Stalin era to the collapse in 1991; it will address how the dissent movement came into being, and how it evolved as new challenges were presented to it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Russian Eschatology: Theological Reflections on the Music of Dmitri Shostakovich
    A Russian Eschatology: Theological Reflections on the Music of Dmitri Shostakovich Submitted by Anna Megan Davis to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology in December 2011 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 2 3 Abstract Theological reflection on music commonly adopts a metaphysical approach, according to which the proportions of musical harmony are interpreted as ontologies of divine order, mirrored in the created world. Attempts to engage theologically with music’s expressivity have been largely rejected on the grounds of a distrust of sensuality, accusations that they endorse a ‘religion of aestheticism’ and concern that they prioritise human emotion at the expense of the divine. This thesis, however, argues that understanding music as expressive is both essential to a proper appreciation of the art form and of value to the theological task, and aims to defend and substantiate this claim in relation to the music of twentieth-century Russian composer Dmitri Shostakovich. Analysing a selection of his works with reference to culture, iconography, interiority and comedy, it seeks both to address the theological criticisms of musical expressivism and to carve out a positive theological engagement with the subject, arguing that the distinctive contribution of Shostakovich’s music to theological endeavour lies in relation to a theology of hope, articulated through the possibilities of the creative act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Men-On-The-Spot and the Allied Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1917-1920 Undergraduate
    A Highly Disreputable Enterprise: Men-on-the-Spot and the Allied Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1917-1920 Undergraduate Research Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation "with Honors Research Distinction in History" in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Conrad Allen The Ohio State University May 2016 Project Advisor: Professor Jennifer Siegel, Department of History The First World War ended on November 11, 1918. The guns that had battered away at each other in France and Belgium for four long years finally fell silent at eleven A.M. as the signed armistice went into effect. "There came a second of expectant silence, and then a curious rippling sound, which observers far behind the front likened to the noise of a light wind. It was the sound of men cheering from the Vosges to the sea," recorded South African soldier John Buchan, as victorious Allied troops went wild with celebration. "No sleep all night," wrote Harry Truman, then an artillery officer on the Western Front, "The infantry fired Very pistols, sent up all the flares they could lay their hands on, fired rifles, pistols, whatever else would make noise, all night long."1 They celebrated their victory, and the fact that they had survived the worst war of attrition the world had ever seen. "I've lived through the war!" cheered an airman in the mess hall of ace pilot Eddie Rickenbacker's American fighter squadron. "We won't be shot at any more!"2 But all was not quiet on every front.
    [Show full text]
  • Scripting the Revolutionary Worker Autobiography: Archetypes, Models, Inventions, and Marketsã
    IRSH 49 (2004), pp. 371–400 DOI: 10.1017/S0020859004001725 # 2004 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis Scripting the Revolutionary Worker Autobiography: Archetypes, Models, Inventions, and Marketsà Diane P. Koenker Summary: This essay offers approaches to reading worker autobiographies as a genre as well as source of historical ‘‘data’’. It focuses primarily on one example of worker narrative, the autobiographical notes of Eduard M. Dune, recounting his experiences in the Russian Revolution and civil war, and argues that such texts cannot be utilized even as ‘‘data’’ without also appreciating the ways in which they were shaped and constructed. The article proposes some ways to examine the cultural constructions of such documents, to offer a preliminary typology of lower- class autobiographical statements for Russia and the Soviet Union, and to offer some suggestions for bringing together the skills of literary scholars and historians to the task of reading workers’ autobiographies. In the proliferation of the scholarly study of the autobiographical genre in the past decades, the autobiographies of ‘‘common people’’ have received insignificant attention. Autobiography, it has been argued, is a bourgeois genre, the artifact of the development of modern liberal individualism, the product of individuals with leisure and education to contemplate their selfhood in the luxury of time.1 Peasants, particularly during the time of ‘‘motionless history’’, are judged to constitute ‘‘anti-autobiographical space’’. Workers, whether agricultural,
    [Show full text]
  • THE LAND WARFARE PAPERS Perestroika and Soviet Military
    THE LAND WARFARE PAPERS No.5 OCTOBER 1990 Perestroika and Soviet Military Personnel By Robert B. Davis A National Security Affairs Paper Published on Occasion by THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY Arlington, Virginia PERESTROIKA AND SOVIET MILITARY PERSONNEL by Robert B. Davis THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN AUSA INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER In 1988 the Association of the United States Army (AUSA) established within its existing organization a new entity known as the Institute of Land Warfare. Its purpose is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of the editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an AUSA Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that AUSA believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. S, OCTOBER 1990 Perestroika and Soviet Military Personnel by Robert B. Davis Mr. Robert B. Davis is a research psychologist with the U.S. Army Foreign Science and Technology Center in Charlottesville, Virginia. Mr. Davis received his undergraduate degree from Arkansas College and his advanced degree from Troy State University, Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Russia and the Formation of the Soviet Union
    CLASSROOM COUNTRY PROFILES Revolution in Russia and the Formation of the Soviet Union The Russian Revolution often refers to two events that took place in 1917. The first, known as the February Revolution, forced Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate and led to the formation of a provisional government. During the second event, commonly known as the October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution, Vla- dimir Lenin’s Bolshevik Party seized power and began seven decades of one-party rule. Some scholars and Soviet critics have argued that the second event was actually a coup by Lenin and his supporters and not a true revolution. The Russian Empire in 1914. Date confusion—The February Revolution actually In the early 1900s, cracks were beginning to appear in the tsar’s control took place in early March. Because the Russian Em- over the Russian Empire. An attempted revolution in 1905, which saw pire followed the Julian Calendar, which is 13 days mass worker strikes and peasant revolts, shook the monarchy and forced behind the Gregorian Calendar, the events are referred Tsar Nicholas II to implement political reform, including the establishment to as the February Revolution. Likewise, the October of a parliament and a new constitution. Revolution actually took place in early November. Reform temporarily quieted the unrest, but the new policies proved inef- Soviet—The word means “council” in Russian. Soviets fective and the parliament, known as the State Duma, was largely unable were workers’ councils made up of various socialist to override the Tsar’s decrees. parties at the end of the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Culture: the End of Russian Intelligentsia
    Russian Culture Center for Democratic Culture 2012 Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia Dmitri N. Shalin University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture Part of the Asian History Commons, Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, Political History Commons, Slavic Languages and Societies Commons, and the Social History Commons Repository Citation Shalin, D. N. (2012). Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia. In Dmitri N. Shalin, 1-68. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture/6 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in Russian Culture by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia Dmitri Shalin No group cheered louder for Soviet reform, had a bigger stake in perestroika, and suffered more in its aftermath than did the Russian intelligentsia. Today, nearly a decade after Mikhail Gorbachev unveiled his plan to reform Soviet society, the mood among Russian intellectuals is decidedly gloomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature and Nihilism in Soviet Environmental Literature and Law Douglas Lind
    Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Volume 23 Article 2 Issue 2 Symposium on the Environment 1-1-2012 The rC ane, the Swamp, and the Melancholy: Nature and Nihilism in Soviet Environmental Literature and Law Douglas Lind Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp Recommended Citation Douglas Lind, The Crane, the Swamp, and the Melancholy: Nature and Nihilism in Soviet Environmental Literature and Law, 23 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 381 (2009). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol23/iss2/2 This Speech is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PANEL THE CRANE, THE SWAMP, AND THE MELANCHOLY: NATURE AND NIHILISM IN SOVIET ENVIRONMENTAL LITERATURE AND LAWt DOUGLAS LIND I. INTRODUCTION Here in the West, the entire seventy-year history of the Soviet Union carries an assortment of negative images. As to the environment, the Soviet image is one of ecological degradation-of large-scale natural resource depletion and rampant environmental despoliation. Justifica- tion for this view abounds, for the environmental record of the U.S.S.R. is indeed a sorry one.1 t On March 25, 2009, the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy hosted a panel discussion entitled "God and Godlessness in the Environment." A version of this paper was presented at that event.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasnost and the Great Patriotic War
    THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : Glasnost and the Great Patriotic War AUTHOR: Nin a Tumarkin CONTRACTOR: Wellesley College PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Nin a Tumarkin COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 804-07 DATE : April 199 1 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided by the National Councilfor Soviet and Eas t European Research. The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author. NCSEER NOTE This paper is a contemporary, analytical discussion of the impact of Glasnost on Soviet citizens ' perceptions of the experiences and memories of World War II, The Great Patriotic War." It is expected to be published in a more compressed form in an upcoming issue of The Atlantic. Summary of Final Report GLASNOST AND THE GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR Nina Tumarkin Today, fifty years after Operation Barbarossa, the 1941 German invasion of the Sovie t Union, the winds of glasnost and perestroikahave demolished that sonorous combination of self- pity and self-congratulation that for so long had characterized the official memorialization of th e "Great Patriotic War" . An enshrined, idealized saga is being replaced with raw human memory . "Our understanding of the war," historian Mikhail Gefter remarked to me not long ago, "i s being transformed from a heroic farce to the tragedy that it really was . " My final report is a summary article based on my forthcoming book, Russia Remember s the War . In 1985, when I began the book, its subject was the cult of the Great Patriotic War i n the Soviet Union . The astonishing events of the past five years have forced me to transform th e book into an exploration of the history, successes, and sudden demise of the war cult .
    [Show full text]
  • Excellent Information #1 World War I: Outbreak, Experience & Aftermath
    Excellent Information #1 World War I: Outbreak, Experience & Aftermath Terms and concepts: Hapsburgs (Dual Monarchy, Austria-Hungary) "Great Powers" Hohenzollerns (Germany) liberalism Romanovs (Russia) Ottoman Empire nation-states empires conservatism socialism (Marxism) parliaments Karl Marx (1818-1883) constitutional government Friedrich Engels (1820-1895) Reichstag (German parliament) Germany Social Democratic Party (SPD) Duma (Russian parliament, 1906-1917) Alsace-Lorraine Bosnia-Herzegovina Archduke Franz Ferdinand & Sarajevo Burgfrieden (peace of the fortress) August Days Schlieffen Plan Battle of the Marne trenches Battle of Verdun home front total war Turnip Winter (1916-17) Erich Ludendorff Paul von Hindenburg David Lloyd George November Revolution (Germany) Armistice (11 Nov 1918) Mustafa Kemal (Atatürk) Bela Kun (Hungarian communist) Woodrow Wilson Georges Clemenceau Fourteen Points Treaty of Versailles Rhineland “War guilt” clause (art. 231) League of Nations Major Language Groups: Romance Germanic Slavic Other Non Indo-Euro Indo-European French German Russian Latvian Hungarian Italian English Ukrainian Lithuanian Finnish Spanish Dutch Bulgarian Greek Estonian Portuguese Danish Serbo-Croatian Albanian Udmurt Romanian Norwegian Slovak Welsh Turkish Swedish Czech Gaelic Icelandic Polish Armenian Population of Powers (in millions) 1890 1900 1910 1913 Russia 116.8 135.6 159.3 175.1 US 62.6 75.9 91.9 97.3 Germany 49.2 56.0 64.5 66.9 Austria-Hung. 42.6 46.7 50.8 52.1 Japan 39.9 43.8 49.1 51.3 France 38.3 38.9 39.5 39.7 Britain 37.4
    [Show full text]
  • Glasnost, Perestroika and the Soviet Media Communication and Society General Editor: James Curran
    Glasnost, Perestroika and the Soviet Media Communication and Society General editor: James Curran Social Work, the Media and Public Relations Bob Franklin and Dave Murphy What News? The Market, Politics and the Local Press Bob Franklin and Dave Murphy Images of the Enemy: Reporting the New Cold War Brian McNair Pluralism, Politics and the Marketplace: The Regulation of German Broadcasting Vincent Porter and Suzanne Hasselbach Potboilers: Methods, Concepts and Case Studies in Popular Fiction Jerry Palmer Glasnost, Perestroika and the Soviet Media Brian McNair London and New York First published 1991 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2006. “ To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/.” Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge a division of Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc. 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1991 Brian McNair All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data McNair, Brian Glasnost, perestroika and the Soviet media. – (Communication and scoiety). 1. Soviet Union. Mass media I. Title II. Series 302.230947 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data McNair, Brian Glasnost, perestroika and the Soviet media / Brian McNair.
    [Show full text]