Urban Transportation System in

2015. 9.

Joonho Ko, Ph.D. Research Fellow

The Seoul Institute Contents

Ⅰ _Seoul Transportation Overview Ⅱ _Subway System Ⅲ _Bus System Ⅳ_ Travel Demand Management and Initiatives Ⅴ_ Big Data

Ⅰ. Overview Overview

Transportation settings

4 Overview

Change of travel modes and roadway network

Mode of transportation

Walk (~ 1945) Streetcar (1945~1970) Bus (1971~1985) Car (1986 ~ 2000)

Expansion of Road Network

1936 1966 1972 2000

5 Overview

Number of cars and traffic congestion cost

Population and Number of Cars

# of vehicles Population

1980 99,286 8,364,379

2013 2,338,864 10,388,055

2255.7%↑ 24.2%↑

Traffic congestion costs (unit: KRW) (Unit : billion)

2001 2013 Traffic Congestion costs 5,087 8,414 65.4%↑ (KRW) Overview

Mode share Mode share

1996 2013

Auto 24.6% 23.1% 1.5%↓

Public 59.5% 65.6% 6.1%↑ Transportation

Transit ridership

1985 2013

Total 3,313 4,145 25%↑

Subway 511 2,485 386%↑

Bus 2,802 1,660 41%↓ Ⅱ. Urban Railway System Subway System

Subway system Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 1 - Line #5: 1990 ~ 1996 - Line #9: 2001 ~ 2009 - Line #1: 1971 ~ 1974 - Line #6: 1994 ~ 2001 - Ui-Sinseol Line (7.8km, – Cheongnangri) - Line #7: 1990 ~ 2000 - Line #2: 1978 ~ 1984 - Line #8: 1990 ~ 1999 - Line #3, #4: 1980 ~ 1985 Subway System

Subway system

1st 2nd Stage Stage Metro Metro

3rd Stage Regional Metro Rail Subway System

Subway system Subway Extension Subway System

Subway station catchment area . 41% of Seoul area (built-up area) is included within the station catchment area on the basis of 500m radius

Subway station catchment area

Radius Catchm- Ratio to Catchm- Ratio to ent area whole ent area Seoul Seoul within built-up area built-up area area 100m 9.9㎢ 1.6% 6.5㎢ 1.8%

200m 38.2㎢ 6.3% 27.3㎢ 7.6%

300m 83.2㎢ 13.7% 61.2㎢ 16.9%

500m 202.3㎢ 33.4% 148.0㎢ 41.0%

* Seoul area: 605.25 ㎢ (built-up area: 361 ㎢)

Legend 500m 역세권 구경계_Project Subway System

Crowdedness . Tolerable degree of crowdedness = 150%, but current conditions during rush hour exceed the degree

Overall Line 1 Line 2 Line 3 Line 4 Line 5 Line 6 Line 7 Line 8 Line 9

2009 159% 122% 202% 122% 172% 168% 177% 179% 176% RH

2011 169% 144% 196% 149% 180% 170% 143% 182% 147% 215% RH

Difference +10% +22% -6% +27% +8% +2% -34% +3% -29% - (2011 – 2009)

Note: For line 9, the highest crowdedness is for express services. Subway System

Subway operating companies As of 2011

Boarding (million Established Length (km) # of Stations Revenue (million USD/day)** persons/day)

Seoul Metro 1981 137.9 120 3.04 2.01

Seoul Metropolitan 1994 152 148 1.73 1.18 (SMRT) Metro 9 2004 25.5 25 0.17* 0.11* Note: * as of 2010; ** exchange rate: $1.0 = KRW1100 Subway System

Fare vs. operating cost Unit: KRW/passenger

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Average 659 723 736 727 726 725 791 fare

Seoul Operating 948 1,007 1,018 1,048 1,092 1,051 989 Metro cost

Difference -288 -284 -282 -321 -366 -326 -198

Average 687 756 760 754 749 750 818 fare

Operating SMRT 1,285 1,262 1,277 1,283 1,217 1,276 1,207 cost

Difference -598 -506 -517 -529 -468 -525 -388 Subway System

Plan for rail network expansion Central governm ent LRT construction for low transit Service Areas (73.7 km, 8 Lines) 12% Private Seoul 54% - Establishing a 10-Year Master Plan for Urban Railroad 34%

(0.9 trillion KRW for 11.4km) Subway System

Ppp project: Metro 9

Planning Construction Operation

Infra

30 year concession BTO 10 year contract Rolling stock, station

17 Ⅲ. Bus System Bus System

Bus system As of December 2011 City bus : 7,534buses/363 routes, Community bus :1,401 buses/210 routes No. of passengers in a day (average) 5.7 million Bus only lane : 52 corridors, 203.6km (Median bus lane : 12 corridors,114.3km)

Bus System

Color-coded hierarchical bus system

(sub)Urban areas ↔ (sub)Center cities Meet the demand of private car. Inter-regional Lines

Connecting suburban areas and center cities Punctuality and speediness. Trunk Lines

Link trunk line buses or subways for easy transfer Satisfy the local needs and securing accessibility. Feeder Lines

Circular bus service for business and shopping in urban areas.

Circular Lines Bus System

Integrated distance-based transit fare system

Free transfer between bus-bus and bus-subway, free transfer within 30 minutes. (maximum 5 times)

Subway (single ride) : Basic Fare W1,050 for 10 Km Distance-based Fare W100 for 5Km up to 40Km and for 10Km beyond

 Bus [single ride] : Flat Fare W1,050(Trunk) / W 1,850 (Inter regional bus)

 Expansion of the fare system in Metropolitan area

July 2004 Seoul urban bus ↔ Seoul metropolitan subway

July 2007 Seoul urban bus ↔ Seoul metropolitan subway ↔ Gyeonggi bus

September 2008 Seoul urban bus ↔ Seoul metropolitan subway ↔ Gyeonggi bus ↔ Red bus October Seoul urban bus ↔ Seoul metropolitan subway ↔ Gyeonggi bus 2008 ↔ Red bus ↔ bus Bus System

Number of bus – subway transfer passengers

thousand passengers % 600 35

500 30

25 400 20 300 Number of passengers who transfer Transfer passengers/Total passengers 15 200 10

100 5

0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Note: Data is only applied to 5,6, 7 and 8 lines. Bus System

Bus management system

For Public Seoul BMS Bus Company

BIT -Real-time Bus -Real-time Bus Operation Information Operation Info -Route and Transfer -Bus Operation DB Info • Bus Location ARS Mobile Internet • Allocating Bus • Route and operation Info • Real-time • Notice • Bus Arrival Time Bus location Info •Interval and operation Info

•Bus Interval Info •Bus Operation Info Bus System

Median bus lanes - 12 corridors of 115.3km (210 km including planned corridors) For faster and reliable bus operation To improve passengers’ convenience by comfortable shelter, transfer center

Under Operation

Plan for 2013

Plan for 2014 - 2016

After 2017 Bus System

Transportation centers

Yeoido Transportation Center

Seoul Station Center

Cheongnyangni Transportation Center, July. 2005 Bus System

Night Bus Implemented on two pilot routes (N37 and N26) using 6 buses for each route Service hour: from midnight until 3:30am Service interval: 35 ~ 40 minutes Fare: 1,850 KRW (higher than regular fare)

26 Bus System

Electric bus pilot project

. EV Bus in Namsan . Namsan EV Bus Routes

Type Category Features Weight 10.7 ton Vehicle 11m(Length) × 2.49m(Width) × Size 3.5m(Height) Drive Motor 240kW (322hp) Engine Line No. 02 Battery Lithium-ion polymer(80kWh) Line No. 05 Top speed 100km/h Line No. 03 Gradability* 30%(17˚) Performance Distance per 110km (Driving at 60km/h) Charging Charging time 20mins(Rapid charging) Bus System

Transit Mall

Target road: Yonsei-ro (550 meter) Opened in Jan. 2014 Provision of more pedestrian and bike spaces Allowed to run for buses and emergency vehicles Taxies are allowed to travel during midnight to 6am

28 Travel Demand Management and Ⅳ. Initiatives Travel Demand Management

Historical TDM program evolvement

Namsan Raised fee impact traffic Parking cap Parking pricing

Annual fee impact traffic Non

Raised fee impact traffic

Expanding Expanding cap parking area

Raised fee impact traffic

Illegal enforcement parking

-

free parking

Mandatory

congestion congestion charging

1990 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2013

Employer

Car Sharing

Publictransit reform Flexible hours working

Monthly public Monthly day transit

Weekly no Chunggae Business taxi

Revised Revised Employer

2nd phase systemmetro

1

st

phase metro phase systemmetro

Voluntary

(Line 1~4,’85)

Metro line9

(Line 5~8)

-

basedTDM

stream stream restorationproject

-

driving day driving program

-

basedTDM

30 Travel Demand Management

Energy consumption and mode share

Mode share VS. Energy consumption share

Energy에너지 12.1% 5.5% 55.7% 6.1% 19.2% 1.5%

Motorcycle

Bus Metro Passenger Taxi Truck car

수단분담률Mode(2009) 27.8% 35.2% 25.9% 6.2% 4.1% 0.8% share (2009)

버스 지하철 승용차 택시 트럭 오토바이

31 Travel Demand Management

Annual traffic impact fee . Why? - Reducing the amount of traffic - Securing revenue for transit system improvement

. Who pays? - Building owners (≥1,000 ㎡ of Total floor area)

. Equation for annual traffic impact fee - Floor area × Traffic impact fee unit × Coefficient by building type

2 . Traffic impact fee unit (unit: KRW/m ) Jan. 1990 May 1995 Oct. 1996 Total floor area <3,000㎡, < 10 parking spaces 350 350 350 Total floor area ≥ 3,000㎡, ≥10 parking spaces 500 700 Note: Revenue (2011) of about 84 billion KRW (70 million USD)

32

Travel Demand Management

Employer-Based TDM . Incentives for the employer-based TDM: reduction of traffic impact fee . Different reduction rates for different employer-based TMD programs

⇒ Average traffic impact fee reduction rate: 17.9% (for the applicants; as of 2010)

Traffic impact fee reduction rate(%) reductionfee impact Traffic Program 15. Business taxi 1. Number plate rationing program (last digit) 16. Shuttle bus operation for customers 2. Voluntary weekly no driving day program 17. Commuting bus operation 3. Number plate rationing program (weekday) 18. Installment of parking guidance system 4. Number plate rationing program (even & odd) 21. Elimination of free parking 22. Reduction of parking space 23. Employee parking restriction 24. Others 33

Travel Demand Management

Congestion Pricing . Charging implementation: `96.11.11

. Charging time period: Weekdays 07:00 ~ 21:00

. Charging point: Namsan 1 tunnel, Namsan 3 tunnel

. Amount: 2,000 KRW

. Target: passenger cars with less than 3 occupants

. Legal speed criteria for the selection of target roads

Expressways Arterials

# of lanes >= 4 >= 4 <= 3 (one way)

Speed < 30km/h < 21km/h < 15km/h

Occurrence At least 3 times per day

34 Travel Demand Management

Weekly No Driving Day Program: Characteristics

. Voluntary participants can choose at least one weekday as their no-driving day

. Applied time : 7am to 10pm, weekdays except for Sat., Sun., and national holidays

. Target vehicles : non-commercial vehicles carrying less than 11 passengers

. Incentives : discount on annual car tax (5%), congestion charge (50%), public parking fees (10- 20%), gasoline price (1-6¢/liter), car maintenance cost (5-10%), and auto insurance premiums (8.7%)

. Management : adopting RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) technology: participants should attach RFID-tag on the windshield of their car

Apply for and receive electronic tag

Attach the tag to the car

RFID readers verify compliance

Successful sincere participants are given incentives 35 Travel Demand Management

Car-sharing system

Run by a total of 5 business operators (regular cars : 2, electric cars : 3)

1,816 cars running in 850 sharing stations throughout Seoul (regular car : 1,474, electric car : 342)

# of trips by car-sharing: 7,909 trips/day (0.02% of total trips in Seoul)

Regula Electric Sum r Cars Cars

Number of 349,999 290,222 59,777 members

Number of cars 1,816 1,474 342

Number of 769,265 691,062 78,203 accumulated users

Number of users 2,775 2,540 202 per day

Number of users 1.5 1.7 0.7 per car each day

Average rental time 4hr 2min 4hr 24min 3hr 49min

# of sharing cars : 대 대 대 대 대 Average mileage 1 2 3~5 6~10 11~15 57 74 46 per rental (km) 36 Ⅴ. Big Data in Transportation Big Data

Background

. 2.5 quintillion bytes of data are generated every day! - A quintillion is 1018 . Data come from many quarters - Social media sites - Sensors - Digital photos - Business transactions - Location-based data

Source: IBM http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/bigdata/ Big Data

Definition

Big data was defined by IBM in 2010 Big Data

There is much more than meets the eye!!

40 Big Data

Transportation card

Number of bus passengers Level of crowding near and in CBD during morning peak hour

Temporal distribution of metro ridership (Weekdays) Temporal distribution of metro ridership (Weekends) (Data: Line 1- 4, 2013) (Data: Line 1- 4, 2013) 12 12 10 10

8 8

% % 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time of day Time of day 41 Big Data

Archived traffic speed

Congested road segments with more than Congested road segments with more than or equal to two hours of congestion per day or equal to two hours of congestion per day (hourly speeds of less than 10 km/h) (hourly speeds of less than 15 km/h)

100% 84% 87%

평일weekdays 85% 79% 81% 80% 73% 76% 주말weekend 70% 63% 58% 60% 46% 39% 40%

19% 20%

Cumulativeproportion 12% 0%0% 2%1% 0% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Threshold speed (km/h) 42 Big Data

Taxi digital Tachograph (DTG)

. A device for collecting taxi operation data - Location, passenger boarding/alighting, fare, operation time . 100% installment of DTG for 72,189 Seoul Taxis

Non- Data Vehicle Driver’ Service Nighttime Type of Type of Company Company Boarding Alighting Boarding x- Alighting y- service No. Collected Registratio s Distanc Fare Extra Paymen Taxi Name Time Time coordinate coordinate Distanc Date/Time ID n Number e Charge t ID e Corporati 2013-03-25 한양상운( 서울33사14 2013-03-24 2013-03-25 Credit 301200006 3323 3005 3700 Normal 127057771 37592720 3809 1 on 0:00 주) 33 23:52 0:00 Card Corporati 2013-03-25 삼익택시( 서울34사25 2013-03-24 2013-03-25 301200011 4970 6554 6900 Normal Cash 126907898 37519421 1699 2 on 0:00 주) 18 23:41 0:00 Owner- 2013-03-25 서울33사26 2013-03-24 2013-03-25 Extra 301200016 5127 1525 2400 Cash 126546260 37362755 686 3 driven 0:00 23 23:55 0:00 Charged Big Data

Taxi digital Tachograph (DTG)

Spatial distribution of Seoul taxi trips

During 8 a.m. – 9 a.m. During 12 a.m. – 1 a.m.

Seoul Taxi Operational Characteristics 1.0 7 0.8 6 0.6 5 % 0.4 4 0.2 3

Cumulative density Cumulative 0.0 2

0 1

40 80

120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 Daily travel distance (km) Time of day 44 Big Data

Characteristics of car-sharing Car-sharing stations with high usages (top 20%) - Large population in nearby areas - High accessibility to subway station Use less than 1 time a day 23% - Few car-sharing stations Use 1 - 2 times a day 52% in neighboring area (less competitions) Use 3 - 4 times a day 17% - Mixed land use - University-located area Use 5 or more a day 8%

⊙ less than 1 ⊙ 1~2 ⊙ 2~5 ⊙ 5~10 ⊙ above 10

top 20% of car-sharing stations 45 Big Data

Car-sharing

Peak time of Car-sharing use is different from that of traffic volume

More rentals during day time and night time

도심 교량 간선 시계 나눔카 대여

1.80

1.60

1.40

1.20

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00

00~01 01~02 02~03 03~04 04~05 05~06 06~07 07~08 08~09 09~10 10~11 11~12 12~13 13~14 14~15 15~16 16~17 17~18 18~19 19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23 23~24

시간 time 46 Big Data

Pedestrian activity

보 180 행 160 07:30 08:30

량( 140

인/5min) 120

100

80 60 40 20

0

07:05 07:35 08:05 08:35 09:05 09:35 10:05 10:35 11:05 11:35 12:05 12:35 13:05 13:35 14:05 14:35 15:05 15:35 16:05 16:35 17:05 17:35 18:05 18:35 19:05 19:35 20:05 20:35

------

07:00 07:30 08:00 08:30 09:00 09:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30

09:30 10:30 11:30 12:30

13:30 14:30 15:30 16:30

17:30 18:30 19:30 20:30

47 Big Data

edestrian activity P Weekday

08:00~09:00 12:30~13:30 18:00~19:00

Weekend 08:30~09:30 12:45~13:45 18:15~19:15

48 Big Data

What can we do with the big data?

. Pin-pointing problematic areas . Balancing supply and demand of services . Improving quality of services . Increasing operational efficiency

. Facilitating data collection

Saving money + Saving resources + …

49 Thank you!! [email protected]