DOCSLIB.ORG

Slovakia Political Briefing: the Review of Slovak Political Development in 2019 Peter Csanyi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Slovakia Political Briefing: the Review of Slovak Political Development in 2019 Peter Csanyi ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 24, No. 1 (SK) Dec 2019 Slovakia political briefing: The review of Slovak political development in 2019 Peter Csanyi 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 The review of Slovak political development in 2019 This current government’s term was marred by corruption and by the brutal murder of the investigative journalist Ján Kuciak and his fiancée, after he started digging into alleged links between the office of the then Prime Minister, Robert Fico, and the Italian mafia. The murder caused a huge outcry from the public, who demanded a thorough investigation and staged the largest protests since the Velvet Revolution. The public called for anti-corruption measures and posed questions about the country’s state of democracy. This ultimately resulted in the resignation of Fico, who was replaced by Peter Pellegrini. Multiple ministers also stepped down. However, with Fico still heading SMER-SD, he maintained scope to influence Pellegrini and set the direction of the government. The protests has also continued in 2019. The murder accelerated the decline of SMER-SD and bolstered the opposition. The presidential elections were seen as a crossroads: sticking with the old establishment in the form of SMER- SD-supported EC Vice-President for Energy Union, Maroš Šefčovič; or a desire for change embodied in the political novice Zuzana Čaputová from the relatively new social liberal Progressive Slovakia (PS) party. Besides, Slovakia has faced another problems during this year, what began with the chaos regarding the election of Constitutional Court judges and continued with another affairs of the Slovak coalition government - the Threema messages. Additionally, this year’s EP elections could be a stepping stone towards next year’s parliamentary elections, which will be decisive for Slovakia in choosing whether to follow the progressive or nationalist path. The most important political events, which has had an effect on Slovakia in 2019: Slovak Presidential Elections: Thanks to the victory of Zuzana Čaputová, Slovakia joined the few countries in the world with female presidents. She gained 1,056,582 votes in the recent presidential election and became not only the first Slovak female president, but also the first female president among the countries of Central Europe. Although observers warn about jumping to quick conclusions about how progressive Slovak society is in terms of gender equality. Still, electing a woman to the highest constitutional post in the country is definitely a breaking point. However, even though the election of Čaputová is symbolic, one should keep in mind that Slovaks did not elect “a woman” to the presidential post, but a specific candidate. She has a background in law and 1 in the third sector, a woman who openly talks about her liberal attitudes, her view of how insulting and equivocal is the political communication in Slovakia. Čaputová is a political newbie whose anti-corruption campaign struck a chord in a country still grappling with the murder in February last year of investigative journalist Ján Kuciak. The murder triggered some of the biggest protests seen in post-communist Slovakia. The killings were one of the main reasons what motivated Čaputová to run for office for the very first time. Although Čaputová was largely unknown before she skyrocketed in polls just weeks before the election, she has condemned widespread corruption and vowed to fight for justice for all. Her connection with journalist Kuciak's case began long before his death. Čaputová as a lawyer previously waged a 14-year legal battle with a company represented by accused businessman Marian Kočner that planned to build an illegal landfill in her home town in Pezinok, and she won the case. During the election campaign Čaputová turned her back on issues that have worked so effectively for populist parties in neighboring Hungary and Poland, such as migrants and family values. Besides, in Slovakia, a country where same-sex marriage is illegal, she called for greater LGBT rights. Voters apparently liked what they heard, and Čaputová gained just over 58% of the vote in a second-round run-off against a European commissioner Maroš Šefčovič. Besides the success of the new president, a very positive news for Slovakia was that some extreme candidates for the presidency were eliminated already after the first round of voting on March 16. The final results were a victory for a different brand of politics. Čaputová’s victory may give a boost to opposition parties looking to replace Smer-SD, still the most popular party, in next year’s general election. However, the fact that anti-system voters, represented in the first round of the presidential race by far-right extremist Marian Kotleba and Supreme Court judge Štefan Harabin, who together won some 25 percent of the vote, may pose a problem. The victory is also unique when compared to some of Slovakia’s neighbors. Her emphatic victory represents a rare success for liberal forces in Central Europe, where populist and nationalist parties have racked up a string of victories in recent years, and pushed through illiberal reforms that have sparked consternation in Brussels that the region is drifting away from its democratic moorings. 2 European Parliament Election in Slovakia: The EP election in Slovakia was predicted as combative campaigning with a clash between pro- and anti-EU political movements with an expectation that the new Slovak delegation in the EP would be probably significantly fragmented. While the election was important for new parties to consolidate their presence on the Slovak political scene, the far- right extremist ĽSNS, for example, were trying to build as much as possible on the relatively strong showing of its leader in the recent presidential elections. The coalition of Progressive Slovakia and Spolu (who supported Zuzana Čaputová in the presidential election in March) won the election ahead of the ruling Smer-SD. The far right ĽSNS ended third. The election turnout was 22.74 percent, much higher than in 2014, when Slovakia posted a turnout of 13 percent. It was a substantial improvement over 2014. Despite the fact that the turnout in Slovakia has almost doubled since 2014, it was still the lowest within the EU, with the European average at almost 51 percent. It is nothing the Slovaks could be proud of, but it does show a positive trend. Slovakia has reversed the decreasing turnout that had been dropping in the last three European elections. It partly means that Slovak citizens are interested in issues that concern the international community and are not focused only on themselves. The results of the European Parliament election in Slovakia have clearly shown and confirmed the victory of pro-EU forces. Slovaks have chosen mostly pro-European politicians to represent them in the European Parliament in the next five years. In the EU election, voters have turned away from parties of the ruling coalition. The EP election meant a total blow-out of the two coalition partners of Smer-SD (Most-Híd and SNS). They did not get any mandates in the European Parliament. Out of the 14 mandates that Slovakia gets in the EP (13 + 1 after Brexit), only three will be taken by candidates of a coalition party (Smer-SD), while six go to non-parliamentary opposition, two mandates to far-right extremists, and three to parliamentary opposition parties. A coalition of two new parties, Progressive Slovakia and Spolu, confirmed their victory wave during the elections to European Parliament. After electing Matúš Vallo as Bratislava mayor and Zuzana Čaputová as the president of Slovakia, they won the EP elections with 20.11 percent of votes, which will translate into four mandates. However, the far-right People’s Party- Our Slovakia (ĽSNS) also had a strong result. With the support of 12 percent of votes, it obtained two seats in the EP. 3 As many expected prior to the elections, those two forces, strongly pro-EU (PS and Spolu) and strongly anti-EU (ĽSNS), were most successful in mobilizing their electorates. This mobilization helped to increase the turnout to slightly over 22 percent. The election in Slovakia, however, also highlighted other parties. The Christian Democratic Movement (KDH) and Freedom and Solidarity (SaS) also managed to mobilize their voters, both gaining two seats in the European Parliament. Election of Constitutional Court Judges: Nine vacancies were formed at the Constitutional Court in February 2019, with the Parliament supposed to elect double the number of candidates, from which the President was expected to appoint nine judges to the bench. However, the Parliament was not capable of electing the needed number of judges or just did not want to do it. This failure was considered mainly as the failure of the incumbent ruling coalition. The direct cause behind the failure of voting in parliament was a dispute inside the tripartite government coalition. Most-Híd, the smallest party in the government coalition, was opposed to the candidacy of Robert Fico for Constitutional Court judge. As a result, Smer-SD tried to push through a secret manner of electing the candidates, which would have made it easier for Fico to forge behind-the-scenes alliances. However, neither Most-Híd nor Smer-SD’s second coalition partner, the Slovak National Party (SNS), nor the opposition backed this proposal. Faced with a high likelihood of open defeat, Fico withdrew his candidacy, and Smer- SD’s MPs cast invalid votes, thus blocking the election of judges. The paralysis of the Constitutional Court was to a great extent an effect of Robert Fico’s ambitions which also met with resistance from the then-President Andrej Kiska.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom House
    7/14/2020 Slovakia | Freedom House FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2020 Slovakia 88 FREE /100 Political Rights 36 /40 Civil Liberties 52 /60 LAST YEAR'S SCORE & STATUS 88 /100 Free Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. TOP https://freedomhouse.org/country/slovakia/freedom-world/2020 1/15 7/14/2020 Slovakia | Freedom House Overview Slovakia’s parliamentary system features regular multiparty elections and peaceful transfers of power between rival parties. While civil liberties are generally protected, democratic institutions are hampered by political corruption, entrenched discrimination against Roma, and growing political hostility toward migrants and refugees. Key Developments in 2019 In March, controversial businessman Marian Kočner was charged with ordering the 2018 murder of investigative reporter Ján Kuciak and his fiancée. After phone records from Kočner’s cell phone were leaked by Slovak news outlet Aktuality.sk, an array of public officials, politicians, judges, and public prosecutors were implicated in corrupt dealings with Kočner. Also in March, environmental activist and lawyer Zuzana Čaputová of Progressive Slovakia, a newcomer to national politics, won the presidential election, defeating Smer–SD candidate Maroš Šefčovič. Čaputová is the first woman elected as president in the history of the country. Political Rights A. Electoral Process A1 0-4 pts Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 TOP Slovakia is a parliamentary republic whose prime minister leads the government. There is also a directly elected president with important but limited executive powers. In March 2018, an ultimatum from Direction–Social Democracy (Smer–SD), a https://freedomhouse.org/country/slovakia/freedom-world/2020 2/15 7/14/2020 Slovakia | Freedom House junior coalition partner, and center-right party Most-Híd, led to the resignation of former prime minister Robert Fico.
    [Show full text]
  • Unter Europäischen Sozialdemokraten – Wer Weist Den Weg Aus Der Krise? | Von Klaus Prömpers Von Der Partie
    DER HAUPTSTADTBRIEF 23. WOCHE AM SONNTAG 09.JUNI 2019 DIE KOLUMNE Rückkehr zu außenpolitischen Fundamenten AM SONNTAG Die Reise des Bundespräsidenten nach Usbekistan zeigt, wie wichtig die Schnittstelle zwischen Europa und Asien ist | Von Manfred Grund und Dirk Wiese Sonstige Vereinigung ie wichtig Zentralasien für Mirziyoyev ermutigen, „auf diesem Weg Europa ist, hat Frank-Walter entschlossen weiterzugehen“. Steinmeier WSteinmeier früh erkannt. Im und Mirziyoyev kannten sich bereits vom November 2006 bereiste er als erster Au- Berlin-Besuch des usbekischen Präsidenten GÜNTER ßenminister aus einem EU-Mitgliedsland im Januar 2019 – dem ersten eines usbeki- BANNAS BERND VON JUTRCZENKA/DPABERND VON alle fünf zentralasiatischen Staaten. Er schen Staatsoberhaupts seit 18 Jahren. PRIVAT wollte damals ergründen, wie die Euro- Die Bedeutung Zentralasiens für Europa päische Union mit der Region zusammen- hat seit 2007 weiter zugenommen. Zugleich ist Kolumnist des HAUPTSTADTBRIEFS. Bis März 2018 war er Leiter der Berliner arbeiten könne, die – so war ihm schon hat sich die geopolitische Schlüsselregion – Redaktion der Frankfurter Allgemeinen damals klar – „einfach zu wichtig ist, als Usbekistan zeigt es – grundlegend verändert. Zeitung. Hier erinnert er an die politisch dass wir sie an den Rand unseres Wahr- Die EU-Kommission und die Hohe Vertrete- vielgestaltige Gründungsphase der nehmungsspektrums verdrängen.“ Ein rin der EU für Außen- und Sicherheitspoli- Grünen vor 40 Jahren. halbes Jahr später nahm die EU auf Initi- tik haben diesen Entwicklungen Rechnung ative der deutschen Ratspräsidentschaft getragen und am 15. Mai eine überarbeitete die Strategie „EU und Zentralasien – eine Zentralasienstrategie vorgestellt. Unter dem nfang kommenden Jahres wer- Partnerschaft für die Zukunft“ (kurz: EU- Titel „New Opportunities for a Stronger Part- Aden die Grünen ihrer Grün- Zentralasienstrategie) an.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Wages in 2021: Annual Review
    RESEARCH REPORT Industrial relations and social dialogue Minimum wages in 2021: Annual review Minimum wages in 2021: Annual review European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions When citing this report, please use the following wording: Eurofound (2021), Minimum wages in 2021: Annual review, Minimum wages in the EU series, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Authors: Christine Aumayr-Pintar and Carlos Vacas Soriano Research manager: Christine Aumayr-Pintar Eurofound project: Minimum wages – Annual review (210204) Peer reviewers: Barbara Gerstenberger and Maria Jepsen (Eurofound) Contributor: Aoife Doyle Provider: Network of Eurofound Correspondents (see Annex, p. 66, for list of correspondents) Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Print: ISBN 978-92-897-2171-4 ISSN 2599-9303 doi:10.2806/178045 TJ-AS-21-001-EN-C PDF: ISBN 978-92-897-2172-1 ISSN 2599-9311 doi:10.2806/47491 TJ-AS-21-001-EN-N This report and any associated materials are available online at http://eurofound.link/ef21015 It is part of Eurofound's Minimum wages in the EU series. See the full series at http://eurofound.link/efs027 © European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the Eurofound copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Cover image: © JackF/Adobe Stock Photos Any queries on copyright must be addressed in writing to: [email protected] Research carried out prior to the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union on 31 January 2020, and published subsequently, may include data relating to the 28 EU Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Social Democracy in the Visegrad Countries Limits and Challenges Faced by Smer-SD Darina Malová January 2017
    Strengthening Social Democracy in the Visegrad Countries Limits and Challenges Faced by Smer-SD Darina Malová January 2017 Smer-Sociálna Demokracia (Smer-SD) was founded in December 1999 as a result of the defection from the post-communist Party of the Democratic Left (SDĽ) by Robert Fico, the party’s most popular politician at that time. Smer-SD is the largest mainstream party in Slovakia, with stable support. Its mixed, mostly traditional left- -wing (bread-and-butter) appeals and selected social policies have proven popular with the electorate. Robert Fico has remained the key person in Smer-SD. He is the uncontested leader, exercising a large amount of control over the party organisation, including territorial party units, selection of candidates for public elections and many key party decisions. Smer-SD is, in terms of its rhetoric, a traditional socialist party, speaking to the poorer strata, advocating a welfare state, but in reality the party pursues fairly strict austerity policies with occasional ‘social packages’. Unlike Western social democratic parties the leaders of Smer-SD are prone to using national and populist appeals. In terms of ideology (like many other parties in Slovakia) Smer-SD is a typical catch-all party with centrist and partly inconsistent party programmes, appeals to ever wider audiences, and the pursuit of votes at the expense of ideology. The weakest points in the public perception of the party are Smer-SD’s murky relations with oligarchs and high levels of corruption. Strengthening Social Democracy in the Visegrad Countries Limits and Challenges Faced by Smer-SD Darina Malová January 2017 ISBN 978-80-87748-32-9 (online) Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in SLOVAKIA 30Th March 2019
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN SLOVAKIA 30th March 2019 European Zuzana Caputova becomes the first Elections monitor woman to be president of the Republic Corinne Deloy of Slovakia Results As expected, Zuzana Caputova (Progressive Slovakia, PS) was elected President of Slovakia 2nd round on 30th March. The accession of a woman to this post is a first in the country’s history. The candidate won 58.4% of the vote and therefore won easily against her rival, Vice- President of the Commission, responsible for Energy, Maros Sefcovic, who was supported by the party in office Direction-Social Democracy (SMER-SD), who won 41.6% of the vote. During the first round of the election organised on 16th March last Zuzana Caputova had already taken an comfortable lead over her adversary winning 40.57% of the vote (Maros Sefcovic won 18.66%). Turnout rose to 41.79% and was well below that registered in the second round of the previous election on 29th March 2014 (- 8.69 points). Results of the Presidential election on 16th and 30th March 2019 in Slovakia Turn out: 48.74% (1st round) and 41.79% (2nd round) No of votes won % of votes won No of votes won No of votes won Candidates (1st round) (1st round) (2nd round) (2nd round) Zuzana Caputova (Progressive Slovakia, PS) 870 415 40.57 1 056 582 58.40 Maros Sefcovic 400 379 18.66 752 403 41.60 Stefan Harabin 307 823 14.34 Marian Kotleba (Kotleba-People’s Party-New 222 935 10.39 Slovakia, L’SNS) Frantisek Miklosko, independent 122 916 5.72 Bela Bugar (Most-Hid) 66 667 3.10 Milan Krajniak (We are a family, AME R) 59
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: an Early Assessment
    THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: An Early Assessment John Peterson University of Edinburgh Paper prepared for the 14th Biennial Conference of the EU Studies Association, Boston, 5-7th February 2015 DRAFT: Not for citation without permission Comments welcome [email protected] Abstract This paper offers an early evaluation of the European Commission under the Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker, following his contested appointment as the so-called Spitzencandidat of the centre-right after the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. It confronts questions including: What will effect will the manner of Juncker’s appointment have on the perceived legitimacy of the Commission? Will Juncker claim that the strength his mandate gives him license to run a highly Presidential, centralised Commission along the lines of his predecessor, José Manuel Barroso? Will Juncker continue to seek a modest and supportive role for the Commission (as Barroso did), or will his Commission embrace more ambitious new projects or seek to re-energise old ones? What effect will British opposition to Juncker’s appointment have on the United Kingdom’s efforts to renegotiate its status in the EU? The paper draws on a round of interviews with senior Commission officials conducted in early 2015 to try to identify patterns of both continuity and change in the Commission. Its central aim is to assess the meaning of answers to the questions posed above both for the Commission and EU as a whole in the remainder of the decade. What follows is the proverbial ‘thought piece’: an analysis that seeks to provoke debate and pose the right questions about its subject, as opposed to one that offers many answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendrier Du 24 Juin Au 30 Juin 2019 Brussels, 21 June 2019 (Susceptible De Modifications En Cours De Semaine) Déplacements Et Visites
    European Commission - Weekly activities Calendrier du 24 juin au 30 juin 2019 Brussels, 21 June 2019 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 24 juin 2019 President Jean-Claude Juncker receives Mr Jacques Santer, Mr Romano Prodi, Mr José Manuel Barroso and Mr Pascal Lamy for an informal lunch; and hosts the presentation of the book « La commission européenne 1986 – 2000: Histoire et mémoires d'une institution », in the presence of former Members of the European Commission, Mr José Manuel Barroso, Mr Romano Prodi, Mr Jacques Santer and Mr Pascal Lamy. Mr Maroš Šefčovič gives a keynote speech at the New Energy Outlook 2019 Brussels launch, in Brussels. Mr Günther H. Oettinger in Berlin, Germany: meets Ms Angela Merkel, German Chancellor. Mr Johannes Hahn in Amman,Jordan: meets key political country's authorities; visits EU-funded projects; and signs an EU-Jordan financial agreement to support job creation and sustainable growth. Mr Miguel Arias Cañete in Berlin, Germany: meets Mr Peter Altmaier, Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy of Germany; and meets Ms Svenja Schulze, Federal Minister for Environment of Germany. Mr Karmenu Vella in Budapest, Hungary:attends the Virtuous Circle Tour in Hungary. Mr Vytenis Andriukaitis in Berlin, Germany :Participates in the ‘eCommerce of Food: International Conference on Trends and Official Control'. M. Pierre Moscovici à Paris, France : rencontre M. Philippe Herzog, Fondateur de Confrontations Europe et Directeur de la Revue la Lettre de Confrontations Europe. Mr Phil Hogan meets MsBridget McKenzie, Agriculture Minister for Australia, in Brussels. Ms Vĕra Jourová in Prosek, Czech Republic: visits the Bohnice Psychiatric Hospital and Mental Health Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia: Continuation of Electoral Earthquakes Peter Spácˇ
    Slovakia: Continuation of electoral earthquakes peter spácˇ The 2019 European Parliament (EP) election was held in Slovakia on May 25th, the fourth time since the country’s accession to the EU. Two points are worth mentio- ning at the outset. Firstly, turnout increased considerably since the previous election in 2014. However, with roughly one in four voters participating in the election, it was still the lowest turnout in the whole EU. Secondly, the results confirmed the substantial recent changes in Slovakia's political life, with critical implications for the coming years. In line with other EU countries, the elections are held under proportional re- presentation rules. Similar to national elections, there is only one constituency that comprises the whole country. The threshold is set at 5%, which effectively bans smal- ler parties from obtaining EP seats. Similar to several other member states, Slova- kia does not allow its citizens to vote from abroad in EP elections. The country elects fourteen members of the EP (MEPs), although it will only have thirteen until Bre- xit is finalised. background and campaign In the 2016 general election Slovakia experienced a huge shift of its party system. Although SMER-SD lost a considerable part of its support, it maintained its position as first party. As for past elections, populist and antisystem parties gained parliamentary representation, including the extreme right People’s Party-Our Slovakia (LSNS). This electoral success led the new coalition government formed by SMER-SD and its ju- nior partners to state that they serve as a ‘barrier against extremism’ (Rybáˇr and Spáˇc, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Politics and Views on Brexit
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8362, 2 May 2019 The EU27: Internal Politics By Stefano Fella, Vaughne Miller, Nigel Walker and Views on Brexit Contents: 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Croatia 5. Cyprus 6. Czech Republic 7. Denmark 8. Estonia 9. Finland 10. France 11. Germany 12. Greece 13. Hungary 14. Ireland 15. Italy 16. Latvia 17. Lithuania 18. Luxembourg 19. Malta 20. Netherlands 21. Poland 22. Portugal 23. Romania 24. Slovakia 25. Slovenia 26. Spain 27. Sweden www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The EU27: Internal Politics and Views on Brexit Contents Summary 6 1. Austria 13 1.1 Key Facts 13 1.2 Background 14 1.3 Current Government and Recent Political Developments 15 1.4 Views on Brexit 17 2. Belgium 25 2.1 Key Facts 25 2.2 Background 25 2.3 Current Government and recent political developments 26 2.4 Views on Brexit 28 3. Bulgaria 32 3.1 Key Facts 32 3.2 Background 32 3.3 Current Government and recent political developments 33 3.4 Views on Brexit 35 4. Croatia 37 4.1 Key Facts 37 4.2 Background 37 4.3 Current Government and recent political developments 38 4.4 Views on Brexit 39 5. Cyprus 42 5.1 Key Facts 42 5.2 Background 42 5.3 Current Government and recent political developments 43 5.4 Views on Brexit 45 6. Czech Republic 49 6.1 Key Facts 49 6.2 Background 49 6.3 Current Government and recent political developments 50 6.4 Views on Brexit 53 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Campaign for the 2014 Elections to the European Parliament in Slovakia
    INFORMATION CAMPAIGN FOR THE 2014 ELECTIONS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT IN SLOVAKIA 16 September 2013 - 25 May 2014 Presidential Debate (p5;25) Mr. Schulz visit (p2;22) Election Night (p3;27) European Parliament Information Office in Slovakia started the official information campaign for the 2014 Elections to the European Parliament in Slovakia in September 2013. Since then, almost 60 events, discussion forums, outdoor activities and dialogues took place in more than 20 towns and cities across the Slovak Republic. In addition, 6 nationwide competitions focusing on the European Elections were initiated. The most significant and interesting moments of our information campaign were definitely the visit of the EP President Martin Schulz in the Celebration of the 10th Anniversary of the EU membership in Bratislava on 30 April 2014, Election Night dedicated to the official announcement of the results of the 2014 Elections to the European Parliament in Slovakia on 25 May 2014 in the EPIO´s office in Bratislava, four outdoor events dedicated to the Celebration of the 10th Anniversary of the Slovak membership in the EU accompanied by the information campaign to the EE2014 taking place from April to May in four largest Slovak towns (Bratislava, Košice, Banská Bystrica and Žilina) and the watching of live stream of the Presidential Debate accompanied by analytical discussions on 15 May 2014. These activities caught the attention of hundreds of Slovaks who directly participated in them and other thousands of citizens who expressed their interest for our activities through social media. CONTENT I. Most significant moments of the EE2014 Information Campaign in Slovakia.............................
    [Show full text]