Exotic Hunt in Texas ARTICLE and PHOTOS by CRAIG MOORE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EST. S 1987 Wildlife Systems, Inc
EST. s 1987 Wildlife Systems, Inc. was founded in 1987 with a primary focus of providing a dual blend of hunting services for sportsmen seeking quality outdoor adventure, as well as providing landowners with wildlife management services, and this enterprise concept remains the same today. WSI has worked across most regions of Texas, several other states, and multiple foreign countries, and the company's ability to provide adaptive services is one of the unique features that have allowed WSI to successfully integrate into various settings, regardless of the region or resources of interest. WSI currently operates hunting programs on approximately 700,000 acres of private land, offering hunting services for a variety of game species, and hosts hunts each year for clients from over 30 states. Wildlife consulting is provided on numerous other properties which are not enrolled under a WSI hunting program. The growth and continued success of WSI is a direct funtion of a support staff who share in similar operational philosophies developed through company training protocols, striving to offer consistent quality service to our hunters and landowners. From office personnel to guides, cooks to field techs, part-time, fulltime, and seasonal, this group of 30-40 staffers represent the heartbeat of WSI. The quality of their work has been featured in many national and regional magazines, several major television networks, and have received various recognitions including being named the 2002 Dodge Outfitter of the Year, from a cast of over 400 different hunting operations in North America. Company founder and owner, Greg Simons, is a respected wildlife biologist who has been active in his professional peer field for many years, serving as an officer in Texas Chapter of The Wildlife Society and Texas Wildlife Associa tion. -
Animals of Africa
Silver 49 Bronze 26 Gold 59 Copper 17 Animals of Africa _______________________________________________Diamond 80 PYGMY ANTELOPES Klipspringer Common oribi Haggard oribi Gold 59 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Copper 17 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Gold 61 Copper 17 Diamond 80 Diamond 80 Steenbok 1 234 5 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Cape grysbok BIG CATS LECHWE, KOB, PUKU Sharpe grysbok African lion 1 2 2 2 Common lechwe Livingstone suni African leopard***** Kafue Flats lechwe East African suni African cheetah***** _______________________________________________ Red lechwe Royal antelope SMALL CATS & AFRICAN CIVET Black lechwe Bates pygmy antelope Serval Nile lechwe 1 1 2 2 4 _______________________________________________ Caracal 2 White-eared kob DIK-DIKS African wild cat Uganda kob Salt dik-dik African golden cat CentralAfrican kob Harar dik-dik 1 2 2 African civet _______________________________________________ Western kob (Buffon) Guenther dik-dik HYENAS Puku Kirk dik-dik Spotted hyena 1 1 1 _______________________________________________ Damara dik-dik REEDBUCKS & RHEBOK Brown hyena Phillips dik-dik Common reedbuck _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________African striped hyena Eastern bohor reedbuck BUSH DUIKERS THICK-SKINNED GAME Abyssinian bohor reedbuck Southern bush duiker _______________________________________________African elephant 1 1 1 Sudan bohor reedbuck Angolan bush duiker (closed) 1 122 2 Black rhinoceros** *** Nigerian -
Common Eland
Tragelaphus oryx – Common Eland recognised, though their validity has been in dispute (Thouless 2013): Tragelaphus o. livingstonii (Sclater 1864; Livingstone's Eland): also called kaufmanni, niediecki, selousi and triangularis. It is found in the Central Zambezian Miombo woodlands i.e. south- central Africa (Angola, Zambia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Malawi). Livingstone's Eland has a brown pelt with up to twelve stripes. Tragelaphus o. oryx (Pallas 1766; Cape Eland): also called alces, barbatus, canna and oreas. This subspecies is found south of the Zambezi river (South Africa, Botswana and Namibia). The fur is tawny, and adults lose their stripes. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Tragelaphus o. pattersonianus (Lydekker 1906; East National Red List status (2004) Least Concern African Eland or Patterson's Eland): also called Reasons for change No change billingae. It is found in east Africa extending into the Somali arid areas, hence its common name. Its coat Global Red List status (2008) Least concern can have up to 12 stripes. TOPS listing (NEMBA) None Tragelaphus o. oryx occurs throughout the larger part of South Africa, but the far northern Limpopo Province CITES listing None bordering Zimbabwe is regarded as a transitional zone Endemic No between T. o. oryx and T. o. livingstonii or an area where they overlap. This argues the case that they should rather During drought conditions Eland roam extensively be described as ecotypes (in ecotypes, it is common for in order to meet forage and water requirements; in continuous, gradual geographic variation to impose the southern Kalahari during abnormally dry analogous phenotypic and/or genetic variation; this conditions, Eland were found to cover more than situation is called cline.). -
Mixed-Species Exhibits with Pigs (Suidae)
Mixed-species exhibits with Pigs (Suidae) Written by KRISZTIÁN SVÁBIK Team Leader, Toni’s Zoo, Rothenburg, Luzern, Switzerland Email: [email protected] 9th May 2021 Cover photo © Krisztián Svábik Mixed-species exhibits with Pigs (Suidae) 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 Use of space and enclosure furnishings ................................................................... 3 Feeding ..................................................................................................................... 3 Breeding ................................................................................................................... 4 Choice of species and individuals ............................................................................ 4 List of mixed-species exhibits involving Suids ........................................................ 5 LIST OF SPECIES COMBINATIONS – SUIDAE .......................................................... 6 Sulawesi Babirusa, Babyrousa celebensis ...............................................................7 Common Warthog, Phacochoerus africanus ......................................................... 8 Giant Forest Hog, Hylochoerus meinertzhageni ..................................................10 Bushpig, Potamochoerus larvatus ........................................................................ 11 Red River Hog, Potamochoerus porcus ............................................................... -
Archaeozoology in Sub-Saharan Africa 211
210 Field Manual for African Archaeology. Chapter 5 $5&+$(2=22/2*<,168%6$+$5$1$)5,&$ Wim Van Neer 1 $UFKDHR]RRORJ\RU]RRDUFKDHRORJ\GHDOVZLWKWKHDQL VHSDUDWHO\IRU¿QHUVLHYLQJRQDPPDQGPPPHVK PDOUHPDLQVIRXQGDWDUFKDHRORJLFDOVLWHV7RJHWKHUZLWK DQG ZLOO DOORZ FRUUHFWLQJ RI YDOXHV REWDLQHG RQ WKH DUFKDHRERWDQLFDO VWXGLHV WKH IDXQDO DQDO\VLV DOORZV PPVFUHHQ6XFKVHGLPHQWVDPSOHVFDQDOVREHVKDUHG UHFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSDVWHQYLURQPHQWDVZHOODVWKH ZLWKDUFKDHRERWDQLVWVLQWHUHVWHGLQPDFURERWDQLFDO UH ZD\SHRSOHLQWHUDFWHGZLWKSODQWVDQGDQLPDOVLQIRUPHU mains and charcoal, and it is therefore useful to agree on WLPHV$QLPDOERQHVDQGWHHWKDUHWKHPRVWFRPPRQO\ WKHVDPSOLQJVWUDWHJLHVZLWKRWKHUVSHFLDOLVWVSULRUWRWKH encountered remains, but mollusk shells, bird feathers, H[FDYDWLRQ:KHQUHWULHYLQJIDXQDOUHPDLQVLQWKH¿HOG ¿VKVFDOHVHJJVKHOOIUDJPHQWVLQVHFWUHPDLQVDQLPDO it is important that no selection is carried out by the ex droppings are other examples of material that can be FDYDWRUV$OODQLPDOUHPDLQVLQFOXGLQJWKRVHWKDWPD\ found. VHHPXQGLDJQRVWLFRUWRRVPDOOWREHLGHQWL¿DEOHKDYHWR Preservation conditions YDU\ D ORW LQ VXE6DKDUDQ be kept for analysis by the archaeozoologist. Moreover, $IULFDDQGFHUWDLQUHJLRQV\LHOGYHU\OLWWOHIDXQD7KH WKHSURSRUWLRQRIXQLGHQWL¿DEOHUHPDLQVLQDQDVVHP DFLGVRLOVLQODUJHSDUWVRI&HQWUDO$IULFDUHVXOWLQWKH blage is also important as it is a measure of the degree dissolution of the mineral part of animal bone, teeth of fragmentation and thus the state of preservation. It is DQGVKHOO)DXQDOUHPDLQVIURPWKDWUHJLRQDUHWKHUHIRUH evident that to prevent further breakage, care needs to -
Climate-Change Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Strategies for Africa's
CLIMATE-CHANGE VULNERABILITIES AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR AFRICA’S CHARISMATIC MEGAFAUNA CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Jonathan Mawdsley Martha Surridge RESEARCH SUPPORT Bilal Ahmad Sandra Grund Barry Pasco Robert Reeve Chris Robertson ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Deb Callahan Matthew Grason Anne Marsh Ralph and Alice Mawdsley Christine Negra Thomas Nichols Conn Nugent Stacia Van Dyne REVIEWERS Matthew Lewis, WWF Shaun Martin, WWF Dennis Ojima, Colorado State University Robin O’Malley, USGS Wildlife and Climate Change Science Center Karen Terwilliger, Terwilliger Consulting, Inc. Cover photo credit: Martha Surridge CITATION OF THIS REPORT The Heinz Center. 2012. Climate-change Vulnerability and Adaptation Strategies for Africa’s Charismatic Megafauna. Washington, DC, 56 pp. Copyright ©2012 by The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment. The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment 900 17th St, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 Phone: (202) 737-6307 Fax: (202) 737-6410 Website: www.heinzctr.org Email: [email protected] Climate-change Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Strategies for Africa’s Charismatic Megafauna TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 Methods 6 Results and Discussion 8 Future Directions 10 Species Profiles The Big Five African Elephant 11 African Lion 13 Cape Buffalo 15 Leopard 17 Rhinoceros, Black 19 Rhinoceros, White 21 African Wild Dog 23 Bongo 25 Cheetah 27 Common Eland 29 Gemsbok 31 Giraffe 33 Greater Kudu 35 Hippopotamus 37 Okapi 39 Wildebeest, Black 41 Wildebeest, Blue 43 Zebra, Grevy’s 45 Zebra, Mountain 47 Zebra, Plains 49 Literature Cited 50 Climate-change Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Strategies for Africa’s Charismatic Megafauna EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The phrase “African animals” brings to mind elephants, lions and other iconic large mammals often referred to as “charismatic megafauna.” The powerful appeal of these animals is demonstrated in the many African wildlife documentaries on television and enduring public support for zoos and museums featuring African animals. -
June 18, 2018 Ms. Brenda Tapia Program Analyst/Data
June 18, 2018 Ms. Brenda Tapia Program Analyst/Data Administrator Branch of Permits Division of Management Authority U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Via electronic submission Re: PRT-62275C and PRT-63016C, Dub Wallace Ranch, LLC., Sonora, TX. Docket No. FWS-HQ-IA-2018-0011 Dear Ms. Tapia, On behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and its more than 6.5 million members and supporters, I urge the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) to deny Dub Wallace Ranch’s (DWR) requests under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for a Captive-Bred Wildlife (CBW) permit, PRT-62275C, and a permit authorizing interstate and foreign commerce, export, and cull (Take Permit), PRT-63016C, for Arabian oryx. FWS cannot lawfully grant DWR’s permit applications. DWR is a canned hunting facility that irresponsibly breeds endangered species without any consideration of the species’ genetic vitality or conservation. As DWR’s applications make abundantly clear, DWR’s sole interest in securing the CBW registration and Take Permit is to further its business of “breeding exotic bovids and cervids for sport hunting as well as for sport hunting itself.” These aims are fundamentally inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the ESA. As detailed in the enclosed comments and documented by the accompanying exhibits, granting DRW’s applications would be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, not in accordance with law, and in excess of FWS’ statutory authority and limitations. Should FWS nevertheless decide to issue either of these permits, PETA hereby requests notice of that decision, pursuant to 50 C.F.R. -
Last Call for the Sahelo-Saharan Megafauna!
Last Call for the Sahelo-Saharan Megafauna! © Oliv ier Born Understanding the Challenge From the magnificent curved horns of the Scimitar Oryx, to the Addax and Dorcas Gazelle which are well adapted to their harsh habitat and can survive for most of their lives without water, the Sahelo-Saharan antelopes and gazelles are some of the most unique, and also the most threatened animals in Africa. Their rapid decline has been caused by natural and human-induced challenges such as overhunting and habitat degradation, as well as competition with domestic livestock. The Addax is rapidly heading towards extinction in the wild, with the Dama Gazelle close behind. This dire situation calls for immediate action! Moving from Decision to Action In order to restore and maintain gazelle and antelope populations in the Sahara and the Sahel, six antelope and gazelle species were included in Appendix I of the Convention, which requires strict protection by prohibiting the taking of such species. For targeted conservation, an Action Plan was adopted in 1998 by 14 Range States under the auspices of CMS. This tailored instrument provides a framework for governments, NGOs, scientists, local people and the wider international community to collaborate in the conservation of these animals. In the framework of this Action Plan, a number of Range State meetings and projects took place. Relevant national action plans are regularly updated and most importantly, conservation measures are being implemented on the ground; in 2007 for example, the Oryx and Addax were reintroduced in Tunisia. A large conservation area has been established in Eastern Niger to secure the last stronghold of the Addax species in the Termit and Tin Toumma regions. -
Tragelaphus Strepsiceros – Greater Kudu
Tragelaphus strepsiceros – Greater Kudu numerous protected areas across its range. There is an estimated mature population size of 63,708–67,383 animals (2013–2015 counts) across the country, with the majority of the population occurring on private land. The largest subpopulation is in Kruger National Park (KNP) with an estimated 8,239–13,490 animals (2012 count). Using a sample of 23 formally protected areas across its range with adequate long-term data, the population has increased by 72–81% over three generations (1990–2015). Similar increases are inferred on private lands. The high numbers of this species on private land reflect its value as one of Africa’s major trophy animals and it should continue to be utilised sustainably as part of the green Andre Botha economy. The wildlife industry is thus important for ensuring the continued existence of large numbers of Greater Kudu on private land. However, care should be Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern taken to not establish further extra-limital subpopulations National Red List status (2004) Least Concern to prevent competition with local browsers. There are no major threats to this species and thus no immediate Reasons for change No change conservation interventions are necessary. Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern Regional population effects: There is presumably TOPS listing (NEMBA) None dispersal along the northern border of South Africa between Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozambique through CITES listing None the Mapungubwe and Great Limpopo Transfrontier areas Endemic No and northeastern KwaZulu-Natal. Greater Kudu were classified as royal game in the Distribution Albany and Fort Beaufort districts of the Eastern Cape between 1890 and 1905 where legislation Historically, the Greater Kudu occurred over much of for sport hunting provided the foundation for both eastern and southern Africa, from Chad nearly to the Red game reserves, commercial hunting and Sea, south to the Eastern Cape, west to Namibia and ecotourism in the region (Gess & Swart 2014). -
Analysis of Game Meat Production in Namibia
R AN ANALYSIS OF GAME MEAT PRODUCTION AND WILDLIFE-BASED LAND USES ON FREEHOLD LAND IN NAMIBIA: LINKS WITH FOOD SECURITY PETER LINDSEY A TRAFFIC EAST/SOUTHERN AFRICA REPORT This report was published with the kind support of Published by TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa. © 2011 TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa. All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with perrmission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC International as the copyright owner. The views of the author expressed in this pub- lication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF or IUCN. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimi- tation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Lindsey, P. (2011). An Analysis of Game Meat Production and Wildlife-based Land Uses on Freehold Land in Namibia: Links with Food Security. TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe. ISBN 978-1-85850-249-6 Front cover photograph: Greater Kudu Tragelaphus strepsiceros and Springboks Antidorcas marsupialis, Namibia. Photograph credit: Martin Harvey/WWF- Canon. Printed on FSC-certified -
ANIMAL CARE and MANAGEMENT at the NATIONAL ZOO: FINAL REPORT Appeared in Peer-Reviewed, Accessible Literature
Prepublication copy Animal Care and Management at the National Zoo: Final Report Committee on the Review of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Zoological Park Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Division on Earth and Life Studies THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, DC www.nap.edu THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by Contract No. F0336CC10376 between the National Academy of Sciences and the Smithsonian Institution. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Smithsonian Institution, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US government. International Standard Book Number International Standard Book Number Additional copies of this report are available from The National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu Copyright 2005 by the National Academy of Sciences. -
Common Eland (Taurotragus Oryx)
Husbandry Guidelines For the Common Eland Taurotragus oryx Mammalia: Bovidae Author: Helen Harris Date of Preparation: 30 April 2010 Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Course Name and Number: Certificate III Captive Animals Lecturer: Graeme Phipps, Jackie Salkeld, Brad Walker, DISCLAIMER 2 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS WARNINGS These animals are classified as Hazardous. This is upgraded to Dangerous if an animal escapes. A viable escape route must be maintained at all times when working around these animals. These animals are flighty around humans and will run easily if threatened. They may run into their night yards when given access in the afternoon. Stand clear of gateway and take care opening access gates. Do not lock in. Do not chase. Do not force into a corner. Do not split the group. (TWPZ Animal Husbandry Notes) 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 7 2 TAXONOMY ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 NOMENCLATURE .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 SUBSPECIES .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 RECENT SYNONYMS ....................................................................................................................10