DOCSLIB.ORG

Site 6086 (Boreal Stand 86): St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site 6086 (Boreal Stand 86): St Site 6086 (Boreal Stand 86): St. Ignace, Mackinac County, Michigan, Township 41N, Range 4W, Section 10. 1956-07-24 [s.l.]: [s.n.], 1956-07-24 https://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/TEC45NKMV4ZKF8U This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17, US Code). For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright The libraries provide public access to a wide range of material, including online exhibits, digitized collections, archival finding aids, our catalog, online articles, and a growing range of materials in many media. When possible, we provide rights information in catalog records, finding aids, and other metadata that accompanies collections or items. However, it is always the user's obligation to evaluate copyright and rights issues in light of their own use. 728 State Street | Madison, Wisconsin 53706 | library.wisc.edu : Data Yorn Wo. 20 Plent cology Research Univ. of Wisconsin 36 tae ae oe Boone FORSSTS : Stand We, af Oe Mes hf : ‘\ : a oe ae H-Igraty rt us Ht mace Wt pinitn oe 9 Mat Names St Sqyack- N: Machen Locality: oe My ae County: Mitkina, if ®: 4 R: AW Sec: (0 a) ae Tater lg 24 SD Observers: ee : er | Size of Stand 60 101: eM pe Shee oF heme Sampled: : a0 Forest Type: (2//M, - Spruce ~ babar Satiomp Soil Fype: oe ae Popography: Slope: Directions 8 % s iS Prat ef ed = Abang. tail # ytd : ed tay wile Table Wet-Mace — Wel. 3 iy brat dandy - bavuly any bsabaceara parla, - rnb Aa abavert repli Moves Open Grown Tress: % Canopy? ; ee. Stumps: er ee he. 4. 7. : 10, A oe 20 50 a. lis : ae « ee 3. 6. 9. 12. Si agi ; . oy - Te ee : Soil Data: : ees ie ie rE NW P00 CK Ca” Mg Org. Mat. = Colloids © WHC. RO ee a ee a hee ae z ia Oe ee Neel See a gk alee eennn a Spee acpecaneeS acer | area ees aS GE DEPTH CHARACTERISTICS (Color, Texture, Structure, ete.) pS ee, ee — | Ay ue Mad — Mack ~~ Ts ack ee Pedege Ag Lifint ed -~ ad = So Le ee Se ; eee “ a ‘ Parent Material: : * a \ * Maps BFS oy : j : ; a = i eo : oa ae se : J : . a Pos : Sete PE hp i es ee eile 7 Wer. Data Form No. 16 Plant Ecology Research University of Wisconsin TREE DATA SUMMARY SHEET Spruce fon Sfpute- for -rrupud hardwoods. Station Number: S$ jms [of] aap ar] | te [tt] tat Set ae] it ae] te fe fice me 1/21/31 | | [ool [| [Hoole glosiizelase| | fee ee Ed ee ee iced Vogt, a oe pie Lo te ee fo. soos | a] 9] | [sg] ai ssl [300|/a7| zs] 4al ans] | bite LY ee ee betas tl Pa Ld ee | rim me | 8] 3] | | [aga| slasl [aseluslo7iosjaes| fees [roll | | [az] slot [asl iaz| ollie] | ene tt i ae ll A ee fe sere Ee rope» | 21 31 | | [vst ifos| [e7| asi2s| sel ag] | oem | bet to da Le eee | pence a et Ed eee cd P| eee moe | tL ie | bite ne ee le a a a ee ee main oocs |29{72| | | [rpsal gs] 7as|_ [ttl 4osleno|sa.s{isy-s| | Rew a Po toe ee ee fare ta { TT | | [el ats] [sal p¢los{osfas] | ee ee pe ee Lwras |W [ial | | aA rao|imo| —_|sbs{io0.o|(m.o| rea] sooo] | et a ae oe Data.Form No. 19 Plant Ecology Research Univ. of Wisconsin POINT RECORD TREES NORTHERN PINE-HARDWOODS Stand No. pe te | et te pom a ree ines ee emit | dt eeu pee dE etm oo ee pe eter a pr i a eae | eg ie tie ee ee ie vm A ee a a me ee [rile be ee. Se eee gt a ome ee ae Wee ee = [rnin ESD ET Ee ee tee ed eee 8 em ee Be Slate: 3 po Eee | rat —Tie er te Ther tet er Data:Form No. 19 Plant Ecology Research : Univ. of Wisconsin POINT RECORD TREES NORTHERN PINE-HARDWOODS Stand No. &- (7 L mirevmef i | 2 pe ef ts Ts Ts | fee eee —-f ee 7 eee ot ee ee pee Pe ee de ere pore Ft eee a ee ae a ei A ee peer ee dene ce fw | Ee De meaty fees ee ea eee ae tt ee pre Fa Le poe a eg mo pee a Eee oe ie | ee ae fe AA ee me pie a i ee te eae oe oa cee a | Data:Form No. 19 Plant Ecology Research : Univ. of Wisconsin POINT RECORD TREES NORTHERN PINE-HARDWOODS Stand No. _ wire pif t | cs ts | ef ee] | fates tes ee ee mee Ed ree ea biel PO er ae sree eS ea ee = HGH fetes es ee fret a ore ee ieee oe a ee ferme TT =.2 Ses. ee protic = ee a ee a bee | dd eee 4 ieee ee eet oe i ed Pa eee eee ee ee eae ese ee | eae Wut Ss ere gs" b= Jo S¢ LE | My, Cauppy = 67% he 1 LL : Data Form No. 84a Plant Ecology Research University of Wisconsin TABULATION FORM SPRUCE - FIR, SPRUCE - FIR MIXED HARDWOODS STAND NO. Sb elrfals|as|s]7[e]s frofmfrafia) fis |r| |r|] a0 fom Achillea millefolium Pe Actaea pachypoda aS Sak wa ae Se aS SSeS SSS ae Agastache foeniculum ttt +t} +++ +} 4} 4} +++ ++ +++ 4] pieescaeeene tt tt tt | |) Agrostis perennans Ht Ff} pee Allium tricoccum fete eae tt+++++++4++4+ +++ + +4 Alnus crispa ee |S | pe ee Ue | a |e |e Alnus rugosa Saeeeocn os 2 os ee Amphicarpa bracteata p+ttt tt ft tt edd Aepi Ti aemmmepeesen cect) ccf] Se fies ee] ace oe ee ee | re fe Lrg |e Anemone canadensis BSS at Sk hea eS Ss Se Se Sass Anemone cylindrica bd a ee Anemone _quinquefolia Skea ee eS ee Sees SSeS Saas Anemone virginiana SSS Rate See ere SSS ease ae ea Antennaria spp. ee af Ee fea a ee | Apocynum androsaemifoliu tot ttt tL fe] tf] Be} HH Aquilegia canadensis a a da Aralia hispida fa ee [i | Aralia nudicaulis ee eee Aralia racemosa a ee a eee || dectostamylon wrest | Po i Arenaria lateriflora Se Se eS Se ee Be ee Seabee Se Ee) Arisaema atrorubens ei Yd fe Td | oe ee Asarum canadense ps eee SIR ee a Te] Sh | Asclepias exaltata lee ees Pe fea al ap [eT a |e ae eel Aster acuminatus sere fe [i fee eet DT se ea |e Ce Aster ciliolatus ea] ff Lea ce [| Aster furcatus Ce ss es ee ee eS Ee eo Aster lateriflorus CEs a ee a De Ee Se Aster macrophyllus ea | ef a Sae e eaeee Aster nova-angliae Pee a ER eT YS a ee Aster paniculatus ee AN rea ee Ua edd a | Seale | Aster puniceus oa ce | ee |e a | | a | Aster sagittifolius es |e eed a | Pe ee ee Aster umbellatus ee |e ale ee | sl ele ee eee Athvriumfilixfemiga 2) Slee ie Athyrium thelypterioides | | [| [ [| [| [ [ [ TT T T TT 7 tT ty tT tt ty 7 Botrychium lunaria pe a es IAS fe aT a || pacenaeisien SSS eee Saas SSeS See Powerit mulettidum = l(a cfs fee Lf 8 cel a le ie | ee Botrychium virginianum BY ef ae Biachyelymumereceum fesse o| se [| |e el es altha palustri a ae a ee ee ee ee eed Calypso bulbosa epee | oP a a [ae ee Canpanulaleotundifetia<a:| sci | 215" | oa) |e alse esl (eae |e ee Carex arctata (Ss ee ae a | | |e Carex aurea eas a ea | ele ales |e Carex brunnescens ie ces ee Ee arex canescens ae |e | fo ere Data Form No. 84b Plant Ecology Research University of Wisconsin TABULATION FORM SPRUCE - FIR, SPRUCE - FIR MIXED HARDWOODS STAND NO. 36 PI 2 B/4/5/6) 78 Ad (910/12 j ) 3/4/5/6| 7169/0) OQ | Carex disper Pee Carex ebumea ete eae eee on BIBS ES Resa Sees Carex intumescens Pe a ea Le |e Carex leptalea tT EE] a -} 4 Carex pedunculata Pele eal +1} + +++-+ +++} PISiea| Carex pensylvanica r++} | tt cotta eee caste a Carex projecta ese ee LAN dP Piss Ye a |e | ae ee [ed Carex woodii t+ —+—+ +++ ++ f+ +f fff ff ft tt Gaulophyllumehalicroides | [eof esl eu SP fe | fel Gelastrus scandens p+—tt tt tf tt H+tttttt tt tt Chrysanthemum leucanthemm | [| [ [ | [ [ | | [ | [ T [ T TT TT Tt 7 | Chrysosplenium americanu +++] 4+} + +] 4} +] 4 HH EEF EH Cicuta maculata cea he ee eee a eee Cinna latifolia feed i ee | ee nl | Circaea alpina t+} ++ fff} $f} + ff Cirsium altissimum Be See ees eB ee eS eee ae aes Cirsium arvense PN Tae a ca | oes || Cirsium vulgare ptf it ff tf et ft tf} fo tt Glayecniavcacotinteaa so |e Vp a SS fe eS Te fe | a a [| Claytonia virginica hk la ha oll a gl ee Clematis virginiana a dT lea a ee Je | ed ces || Glemaeia vercieltarte< e| oe ee | | aaa eae Clintonia borealis hp ee Comandra richardsiana Ye Uo dS] |e | ne | P e| Comandra umbellata SE aa a ee [ee ee era [ee Comptonia peregrina Sa See aS sea See ee eee ee aes) Convolvulus:spitvameunc.o (5 = (sc | si) |e Peale | eae | ee ee ee Coptis groenlandicum |Y| | | | TY] | | [viv7t tT tT tT tT tT tT tT ty 3 [Zo Cotptlodinn waco oT Corallorhiza striata Pee a Sp aE aa ee | [| Corallorhiza trifida Ae ee ee ee ee Sea eae ornus alternifolia SS SS SS Ba Se Se ae Bae Cornus canadensis CaS a aa eee ESS See Se See Cornus racemosa ASS Swe eh See aS Eases Comus rugosa Aeneas SaaS Sea ae Se Seas Cornus stolonifera SSE Cory deli: aemperwineus sees |e 50 [ec ee [es fe fe teed a) a a ee | Corylus americana ae ee I pe pa ee ee Ei Corylus comuta Gs] ah af Pd I i i a ee Copeoments consteneye dT a Cynoglossum boreale ee fo eS fa eee | ee Cgc picsmsemte Fite [eal es | NY a | || a Cypripedium acaule [eee feed aed aN | et el tee ea eee nha kA chia tio cecal cd ed CGppesp einen treatin |e ofS Sf |S) cee foes [| a eal ee [le Cypripedium reginae ea ee ae i a el a Cystopteris bulbifera ptf ff Cystopteris fragilis fa ese a ae | ele | eal and Dalibarda repens aN farce |e ied a ee] ea af Data Form No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Wiite Pine Forest Service Blister Rust Control FS-355 a Personal Account HISTORY of WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST CONTROL a PERSONAL ACCOUNT Warren V
    United States :5, Department of Agriculture History of WIite Pine Forest Service Blister Rust Control FS-355 A Personal Account HISTORY OF WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST CONTROL A PERSONAL ACCOUNT Warren V. Benedict Former Director Division of Forest Pest Control Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Washington, D.C. March 1981 1'or sale by the Su,erintiideiit of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword With much personal satisfaction I write this introduc- tion to Warren Benedict's story of white pine blister rust control. I first came in contact with this work in the 1930's. Whenever I visited Blister Rust Control (BRC) camps I always came away with the feeling that these young men were helping to save a valuable natural resource and that in the process they were learning much about forest conserva- tion. Moreover, thousands and thousands of young people were having this useful experience. Several years ago I repeatedly urged that someone write thehistoryoftheBlisterRust Control Program. Obviously, if a history of this kind were done, it should be done by someone who has had actual experience in the pro- gram. If some future historian without such experience should attempt to write the story merely by compiling scat- tered statistics, it would be not only a dry as dust account but the statistics might not be fully understood. Nearly all the former top administrators of the BRC program are gone. As one of the very few top BRC people still alive, we thought that Benedict's nearly half a century of intimate knowledge of this program should be utilized before it was too late.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.4. Northern Temperate and Boreal Forests in Ontario 11 1.4.1
    Effects of Intensification of Silviculture on Plant Diversity in Northern Temperate and Boreal Forests of Ontario, Canada by Frederick Wayne Bell A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science Guelph, Ontario, Canada © F. Wayne Bell, January, 2015 ABSTRACT EFFECTS OF INTENSIFICATION OF SILVICULTURE ON PLANT DIVERSITY IN NORTHERN TEMPERATE AND BOREAL FORESTS OF ONTARIO, CANADA Frederick Wayne Bell Advisors: University of Guelph, 2015 Professor S. Hunt Professor S. G. Newmaster Professor M. Anand Dr. I. Aubin Dr. J. A. Baker This thesis is an investigation of the intensification of silviculture has long presented a conundrum to forest managers in the northern temperate and boreal forests of Ontario, Canada aiming to sustainably produce wood fibre and conserve biodiversity. Although intensive silviculture has long been viewed as a threat to biodiversity, it is also considered as a means to increase wood fibre production. In this thesis I determine the nature of the biodiversity– silviculture intensity relationships and improve our understanding of the mechanisms that underpin these relationships. More specifically, studied (i) compositional and functional biodiversity-silviculture intensity relationships, (ii) the relative influence of silviculture on species richness, (iii) effects of intensification of silviculture on functional response groups, and (iv) susceptibility to invasion. My results are based on fifth-year post-harvest NEBIE plot network data. Initiated in 2001, the NEBIE plot network is the only study in North America that provides a gradient of silviculture intensities in northern temperate and boreal forests. The NEBIE plot network is ii located in northern temperate and boreal forests near North Bay, Petawawa, Dryden, Timmins, Kapuskasing, and Sioux Lookout, Ontario, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist Flora of the Former Carden Township, City of Kawartha Lakes, on 2016
    Hairy Beardtongue (Penstemon hirsutus) Checklist Flora of the Former Carden Township, City of Kawartha Lakes, ON 2016 Compiled by Dale Leadbeater and Anne Barbour © 2016 Leadbeater and Barbour All Rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or database, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, without written permission of the authors. Produced with financial assistance from The Couchiching Conservancy. The City of Kawartha Lakes Flora Project is sponsored by the Kawartha Field Naturalists based in Fenelon Falls, Ontario. In 2008, information about plants in CKL was scattered and scarce. At the urging of Michael Oldham, Biologist at the Natural Heritage Information Centre at the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Dale Leadbeater and Anne Barbour formed a committee with goals to: • Generate a list of species found in CKL and their distribution, vouchered by specimens to be housed at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, making them available for future study by the scientific community; • Improve understanding of natural heritage systems in the CKL; • Provide insight into changes in the local plant communities as a result of pressures from introduced species, climate change and population growth; and, • Publish the findings of the project . Over eight years, more than 200 volunteers and landowners collected almost 2000 voucher specimens, with the permission of landowners. Over 10,000 observations and literature records have been databased. The project has documented 150 new species of which 60 are introduced, 90 are native and one species that had never been reported in Ontario to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Site 6096 (Boreal Stand 96): Sucker Lake, Alger County, Michigan, Township 48N, Range 14W, Section 30
    Site 6096 (Boreal Stand 96): Sucker Lake, Alger County, Michigan, Township 48N, Range 14W, Section 30. 1956-08-01 [s.l.]: [s.n.], 1956-08-01 https://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/AFFV53QUJKVW784 This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17, US Code). For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright The libraries provide public access to a wide range of material, including online exhibits, digitized collections, archival finding aids, our catalog, online articles, and a growing range of materials in many media. When possible, we provide rights information in catalog records, finding aids, and other metadata that accompanies collections or items. However, it is always the user's obligation to evaluate copyright and rights issues in light of their own use. 728 State Street | Madison, Wisconsin 53706 | library.wisc.edu 4 Data Form No. 20 Plant Ecology Research Univ. af Wisconsin STAND RECORD FORES TS Stand Noo 9b ee a yd, ne ane: Sutlerr habe Loni 5 ys 2nu, ae W. @ t Gu fey . M4 77 County: Alyn Co. W. Mech. ots Re hiw* Sec: Dates gy ', (9Sb Observers Size of Stand 4p QUts- FM JEM Size of Area Sampled ; Forest Type + Maple beech. Aewlocle - fw “Spree. Soil Type: laude Topee any i : . Slope: Directions getty adios Aagot ti Faer. Condition of Stand: ‘ Keombfil ‘Mee - Open Gram Trees: % Canopy: Stumps 2 : le he To 10. eC. 5. 8. i. 3. 6 9o 12. Soil Datas pee ae K Ca Wg Org. Mat. Colloids § WeH.C. Ao : Ne ads Se el we ee a Oe oe ee SS Re a an eee a Bes tgs Se ea se a ee oe ees ee DEPTH CHARACTERISTICS (Color, Texture, Structure, etc.) be ave hae ee 2 tha, Clad fet, — — - t Ma pe <2 eed B Niet GeSe aol 2 i peel ee "Parent Material: ss x Map: f iy : Le tipi : - Ee : pees deen he pr ty EAT py Ne 2-8) p dkgir ly Micha " a ve a é hor: oe : fs 1, 450 : : | | | : HbA — isd 4a 2 S P me To q whl Ab.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Geoecology of Mont De La Table, Gaspésie, Québec
    RHODORA, Vol. 117, No. 969, pp. 1–40, 2015 E Copyright 2015 by the New England Botanical Club doi: 10.3119/14-07; first published on-line March 11, 2015. VASCULAR FLORA AND GEOECOLOGY OF MONT DE LA TABLE, GASPE´ SIE, QUE´ BEC SCOTT W. BAILEY USDA Forest Service, 234 Mirror Lake Road, North Woodstock, NH 03262 e-mail: [email protected] JOANN HOY 21 Steam Mill Road, Auburn, NH 03032 CHARLES V. COGBILL 82 Walker Lane, Plainfield, VT 05667 ABSTRACT. The influence of substrate lithology on the distribution of many vascular and nonvascular plants has long been recognized, especially in alpine, subalpine, and other rocky habitats. In particular, plants have been classified as dependent on high-calcium substrates (i.e., calcicoles) based on common restriction to habitats developed in calcareous rocks, such as limestone and marble. In a classic 1907 paper on the influence of substrate on plants, M. L. Fernald singled out a particular meadow on Mont de la Table in the Chic-Choc Mountains of Que´bec for its unusual co-occurrence of strict calcicole and calcifuge (i.e., acidophile) plant taxa. We re-located this site, investigated substrate factors responsible for its unusual plant diversity, and documented current plant distributions. No calcareous rocks were found on site. However, inclusions of calcareous rocks were found farther up the mountain. The highest pH and dissolved calcium concentrations in surface waters were found in a series of springs that deliver groundwater, presumably influenced by calcareous rocks up the slope. Within the habitat delineated by common occurrences of calcicole species, available soil calcium varied by a factor of five and soil pH varied by almost 1.5 units, depending on microtopography and relative connection with groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wetland Plant List: 2016 Wetland Ratings
    Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1–17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X THE NATIONAL WETLAND PLANT LIST: 2016 WETLAND RATINGS ROBERT W. LICHVAR U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory 72 Lyme Road Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-1290 DARIN L. BANKS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 Watershed Support, Wetland and Stream Protection Section 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, Kansas 66219 WILLIAM N. KIRCHNER U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 911 NE 11 th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 NORMAN C. MELVIN USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Central National Technology Support Center 501 W. Felix Street, Bldg. 23 Fort Worth, Texas 76115-3404 ABSTRACT The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) administers the National Wetland Plant List (NWPL) for the United States (U.S.) and its territories. Responsibility for the NWPL was transferred to the Corps from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in 2006. From 2006 to 2012 the Corps led an interagency effort to update the list in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the FWS, and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), culminating in the publication of the 2012 NWPL. In 2013 and 2014 geographic ranges and nomenclature were updated. This paper presents the fourth update of the list under Corps administration. During the current update, the indicator status of 1689 species was reviewed. A total of 306 ratings of 186 species were changed during the update.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION This Check List of the Plants of New Jersey Has Been
    INTRODUCTION This Check List of the Plants of New Jersey has been compiled by updating and integrating the catalogs prepared by such authors as Nathaniel Lord Britton (1881 and 1889), Witmer Stone (1911), and Norman Taylor (1915) with such other sources as recently-published local lists, field trip reports of the Torrey Botanical Society and the Philadelphia Botanical Club, the New Jersey Natural Heritage Program’s list of threatened and endangered plants, personal observations in the field and the herbarium, and observations by other competent field botanists. The Check List includes 2,758 species, a botanical diversity that is rather unexpected in a small state like New Jersey. Of these, 1,944 are plants that are (or were) native to the state - still a large number, and one that reflects New Jersey's habitat diversity. The balance are plants that have been introduced from other countries or from other parts of North America. The list could be lengthened by hundreds of species by including non-persistent garden escapes and obscure waifs and ballast plants, many of which have not been seen in New Jersey since the nineteenth century, but it would be misleading to do so. The Check List should include all the plants that are truly native to New Jersey, plus all the introduced species that are naturalized here or for which there are relatively recent records, as well as many introduced plants of very limited occurrence. But no claims are made for the absolute perfection of the list. Plant nomenclature is constantly being revised. Single old species may be split into several new species, or multiple old species may be combined into one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Regional Phylogenies in Exploring the Structure of Plant Assemblages
    The use of regional phylogenies in exploring the structure of plant assemblages Tammy L. Elliott Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biology McGill University Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, Canada 2015-09-015 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy c Copyright Tammy L. Elliott, 2015 All rights reserved Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my parents, who sadly both left this world much to early. I like to dream that you are both enjoying your time together in a place with no worries, where you can enjoy all of the wonderful things in life. Dad—Although you left us when we were so young, I daily cherish the special times the two of us spent together. The memories of exploring the countryside, visiting neighbours, caring for the pigs and skipping school to fish are always close to my heart. Mom—I miss your strength, interesting perspective (albeit humorously pessimistic), no-nonsense attitude towards life and listening ear. I hope that you are finding ways to enjoy your grandchildren and tend your beautiful gardens. I would like to assure you that yes—one day I will have a full-time job. If Roses grow in Heaven Lord, please pick a bunch for me. Place them in my Mother’s arms and tell her they’re from me. Tell her that I love her and miss her, and when she turns to smile, place a kiss upon her cheek and hold her for awhile Because remembering her is easy, I do it every day, but there’s an ache within my heart that will never go away.
    [Show full text]
  • Njplantlist.Pdf
    List of Endangered Plant Species and Plant Species of Concern June 2016 Scientific Name Common Name G Rank S Rank Federal Status State Status Other Status Abies balsamea Balsam Fir G5 S1 E LP, HL Acorus americanus American Sweetflag G5 S1? HL Actaea rubra var. rubra Red Baneberry G5T5 S2 HL Adlumia fungosa Climbing Fumitory G4 S2 HL Aeschynomene virginica Sensitive Joint-vetch G2 S1 LT E LP, HL Agalinis auriculata Ear-leaf False Foxglove G3 SX HL Agalinis fasciculata Pine Barren Foxglove G5 S3 HL Agalinis paupercula var. paupercula Small-flower False Foxglove G5T5 S2 HL Agastache nepetoides Yellow Giant-hyssop G5 S2 HL Agastache scrophulariifolia Purple Giant-hyssop G4 S2 HL Agrimonia microcarpa Small-fruit Grooveburr G5 S2 HL Agrostis geminata Ticklegrass G5 S1? HL Alisma triviale Large Water-plantain G5 S1 E LP, HL Alopecurus aequalis var. aequalis Short-awn Meadow-foxtail G5T5 S2 HL Alopecurus carolinianus Tufted Meadow-foxtail G5 S3 HL Amaranthus pumilus Seabeach Amaranth G2 S1 LT E LP, HL Amelanchier humilis Low Service-berry G5 S1S2 HL Amelanchier nantucketensis Nantucket Service-berry G3Q S1 HL Amelanchier sanguinea var. sanguinea Round-leaf Service-berry G5T5 S1.1 E LP, HL Amelanchier stolonifera Running Service-berry G5 S3 HL Amianthium muscitoxicum Fly Poison G4G5 S2 HL Ammannia latifolia Koehn's Toothcup G5 S1 E LP, HL Andromeda polifolia var. glaucophylla Bog Rosemary G5T5 S1 E LP, HL Andropogon glomeratus var. hirsutior Hairy Beardgrass G5T5 SH.1 HL Andropogon gyrans Elliott's Beardgrass G5 S2 HL Andropogon ternarius var. ternarius Silvery Beardgrass G5T5? S2 HL Anemone canadensis Canada Anemone G5 SX HL Anemone cylindrica Long-head Anemone G5 S1 E LP, HL Anemone virginiana var.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to the Boreal Flora of the Northwest Territories with a Preliminary Vascular Flora of Scotty Creek
    Additions to the Boreal Flora of the Northwest Territories with a Preliminary Vascular Flora of Scotty Creek MARIE -È VE GARON -L ABRECQUE 1, 2, 6 , É TIENNE LÉVEILLÉ -B OURRET 3, 4 , K ELLINA HIGGINS 5, and OLIVER SONNENTAG 5 1Département des sciences biologiques, Pavillon Marie-Victorin, Université de Montréal, 90 avenue Vincent-d’Indy, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7 Canada 2Department of Biology, 209 Nesbitt Biology Building, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6 Canada 3Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5 Canada 4Musée canadien de la nature, 1750 chemin Pink, Gatineau, Québec J9J 3N7 Canada 5Département de géographie, Université de Montréal, 520 chemin Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7 Canada 6Corresponding author: [email protected] Garon-Labrecque, Marie-Ève, Étienne Léveillé-Bourret, Kellina Higgins, and Oliver Sonnentag. 2015. Additions to the boreal flora of the Northwest Territories with a preliminary vascular flora of Scotty Creek. Canadian Field-Naturalist 129(4): 349–367. We present the first survey of the vascular flora of Scotty Cr eek, a peatland-dominated watershed with discontinuous permafrost about 60 km south of Fort Simpson, Northwest Territories (NWT). Of the 140 vascular plant taxa found at Scotty Creek, two are additions to the boreal flora of NWT: Arethusa bulbosa (Dragon’s-mouth, Orchidaceae) and Carex pauciflora (Few-flowered Sedge, Cyperaceae). The occurrence of Arethusa bulbosa extends the known range of this species 724 km to the northwest, making this purportedly eastern American plant almost pan-Canadian. Two other major range extensions (> 200 km) are reported for Carex brunnescens subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Vascular Plants
    NATURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES OF VIRGINIA: RARE PLANTS APRIL 2009 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION DIVISION OF NATURAL HERITAGE 217 GOVERNOR STREET, THIRD FLOOR RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 (804) 786-7951 List Compiled by: John F. Townsend Staff Botanist Cover illustrations (l. to r.) of Swamp Pink (Helonias bullata), dwarf burhead (Echinodorus tenellus), and small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) by Megan Rollins This report should be cited as: Townsend, John F. 2009. Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Plants. Natural Heritage Technical Report 09-07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report. April 2009. 62 pages plus appendices. INTRODUCTION The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation's Division of Natural Heritage (DCR-DNH) was established to protect Virginia's Natural Heritage Resources. These Resources are defined in the Virginia Natural Area Preserves Act of 1989 (Section 10.1-209 through 217, Code of Virginia), as the habitat of rare, threatened, and endangered plant and animal species; exemplary natural communities, habitats, and ecosystems; and other natural features of the Commonwealth. DCR-DNH is the state's only comprehensive program for conservation of our natural heritage and includes an intensive statewide biological inventory, field surveys, electronic and manual database management, environmental review capabilities, and natural area protection and stewardship. Through such a comprehensive operation, the Division identifies Natural Heritage Resources which are in need of conservation attention while creating an efficient means of evaluating the impacts of economic growth. To achieve this protection, DCR-DNH maintains lists of the most significant elements of our natural diversity.
    [Show full text]