Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process Chapter 4 Environmental Values and Management of Impacts Table of Contents 4. Environmental Values and Management of Impacts ................................................................................ 1 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 4.1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 1 4.1.2 Project Description ............................................................................................................... 1 4.1.3 Legislative Overview ............................................................................................................ 4 4.1.4 Other Potentially Applicable National Plans or Policies ...................................................... 10 4.1.5 Project Standards and Guidelines ....................................................................................... 10 4.1.6 Impact Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................ 17 4.1.7 Cumulative Impact Assessment Methodology ..................................................................... 18 4.1.8 Chapter Overview .............................................................................................................. 19 4.2 Weather and Climate ................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Existing Environment .......................................................................................................... 25 4.3 Geology, Geohazards and Soils ................................................................................................... 31 4.3.1 Standards and Reference Values Applied ............................................................................ 31 4.3.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 31 4.3.3 Existing Values ................................................................................................................... 34 4.3.4 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................ 40 4.3.5 Impact Assessment ............................................................................................................. 44 4.3.6 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................... 48 4.4 Surface Water Quality and Flows ................................................................................................. 51 4.4.1 Standards Applied .............................................................................................................. 51 4.4.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 51 4.4.3 Existing Values ................................................................................................................... 54 4.4.4 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................ 55 4.4.5 Impact Assessment ............................................................................................................. 57 4.4.6 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................... 62 4.5 Groundwater ................................................................................................................................ 66 4.5.1 Standards Applied .............................................................................................................. 66 4.5.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 67 4.5.3 Existing Values ................................................................................................................... 69 4.5.4 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................ 73 4.5.5 Impact Assessment ............................................................................................................. 74 4.5.6 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................... 76 4.6 Community Water Supply ............................................................................................................ 77 4.6.1 Regulatory Agencies ........................................................................................................... 77 4.6.2 Standards Applied .............................................................................................................. 77 4.6.3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 78 4.6.4 Existing Values ................................................................................................................... 80 4.6.5 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................ 83 4.6.6 Impact Assessment ............................................................................................................. 85 4.6.7 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................... 88 4.7 Freshwater Ecology ...................................................................................................................... 91 4.7.1 Standards Applied .............................................................................................................. 91 4.7.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 91 4.7.3 Existing Values ................................................................................................................... 93 4.7.4 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................ 99 4.7.5 Impact Assessment ........................................................................................................... 103 4.7.6 Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................................... 106 4.8 Marine Ecology .......................................................................................................................... 109 4.8.1 Standards Applied ............................................................................................................ 109 4.8.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 109 4.8.3 Existing Values ................................................................................................................. 112 4.8.4 Potential Impacts .............................................................................................................. 117 PAGE i 4.8.5 Impact Assessment ........................................................................................................... 124 4.8.6 Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................................... 129 4.9 Terrestrial Ecology ...................................................................................................................... 133 4.9.1 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 133 4.9.2 Existing Values ................................................................................................................. 136 4.9.3 Potential Impacts .............................................................................................................. 147 4.9.4 Impact Assessment ........................................................................................................... 150 4.9.5 Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................................... 155 4.10 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 158 4.10.1 Standards Applied ............................................................................................................ 158 4.10.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 159 4.10.3 Existing Values ................................................................................................................. 164 4.10.4 Potential Impacts .............................................................................................................. 164 4.10.5 Impact Assessment ........................................................................................................... 166 4.10.6 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • East Melanesian Islands Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile East Melanesian Islands Biodiversity Hotspot FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2012 Prepared by: University of the South Pacific in collaboration with: Conservation International University of Papua New Guinea on behalf of: Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund Drafted by the ecosystem profiling team: Bill Aalbersberg Michael Avosa Roger James Chalapan Kaluwin Paul Lokani Job Opu Suliana Siwatibau Marika Tuiwawa Hilda Waqa-Sakiti Andrew W. Tordoff Assisted by the following experts and contributors: Lawrence Abage Nathos Beach Club, New Ireland, Papua New Guinea Michael Aigro University of Papua New Guinea Julia Aimaea Ministry of Forests and Research, Papua New Guinea Cosmos Akong Whiteman Range, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea Philemon Ala Forestry Department, Vanuatu Freddie Alei University of Papua New Guinea Lui Allick Tafea Provincial Government, Vanuatu Jason Alonk University of Papua New Guinea Alwin Amat University of Papua New Guinea Jeane Amos Raura Manager, New Ireland, Papua New Guinea Lazarus Amos Samna Provincial Government, Vanuatu Philip Anacleti Department of Environment and Conservation, Vanuatu Ramokasa Anisi University of the South Pacific, Solomon Islands Bill Apusae Live and Learn, Solomon Islands Troy Apusae Solomon Islands College of Higher Education Philip Arul University of Papua New Guinea ii Andrew Assman University of Papua New Guinea James Atherton independent consultant, Samoa Gabriel Bata Kilu Locally Managed Marine Area, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea Bradley Ben Aua Wuvulu, Manus, Papua New
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries and Aquaculture
    Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation 7. GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR Formulation and Operationalization of National Action Plan for Poverty Alleviation and Rural Development through Agriculture (NAPA) Working Paper - 4 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE Yangon, June 2016 5. MYANMAR: National Action Plan for Agriculture (NAPA) Working Paper 4: Fisheries and Aquaculture TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. BACKGROUND 5 2.1. Strategic value of the Myanmar fisheries industry 5 3. SPECIFIC AREAS/ASPECTS OF THEMATIC AREA UNDER REVIEW 7 3.1. Marine capture fisheries 7 3.2. Inland capture fisheries 17 3.3. Leasable fisheries 22 3.4 Aquaculture 30 4. DETAILED DISCUSSIONS ON EACH CULTURE SYSTEM 30 4.1. Freshwater aquaculture 30 4.2. Brackishwater aquaculture 36 4.3. Postharvest processing 38 5. INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT 42 5.1. Management institutions 42 5.2. Human resource development 42 5.3. Policy 42 6. KEY OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS TO SECTOR DEVELOPMENT 44 6.1. Marine fisheries 44 6.2. Inland fisheries 44 6.3. Leasable fisheries 45 6.4. Aquaculture 45 6.5. Departmental emphasis on management 47 6.6. Institutional fragmentation 48 6.7. Human resource development infrastructure is poor 49 6.8. Extension training 50 6.9. Fisheries academies 50 6.10. Academia 50 7. KEY OPPORTUNITIES FOR SECTOR DEVELOPMENT 52 i MYANMAR: National Action Plan for Agriculture (NAPA) Working Paper 4: Fisheries and Aquaculture 7.1. Empowerment of fishing communities in marine protected areas (mpas) 52 7.2. Reduction of postharvest spoilage 52 7.3. Expansion of pond culture 52 7.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Terengganu East Coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia Ii Iii
    i Fishes of Terengganu East coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia ii iii Edited by Mizuki Matsunuma, Hiroyuki Motomura, Keiichi Matsuura, Noor Azhar M. Shazili and Mohd Azmi Ambak Photographed by Masatoshi Meguro and Mizuki Matsunuma iv Copy Right © 2011 by the National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. Copyrights of the specimen photographs are held by the Kagoshima Uni- versity Museum. For bibliographic purposes this book should be cited as follows: Matsunuma, M., H. Motomura, K. Matsuura, N. A. M. Shazili and M. A. Ambak (eds.). 2011 (Nov.). Fishes of Terengganu – east coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia. National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum, ix + 251 pages. ISBN 978-4-87803-036-9 Corresponding editor: Hiroyuki Motomura (e-mail: [email protected]) v Preface Tropical seas in Southeast Asian countries are well known for their rich fish diversity found in various environments such as beautiful coral reefs, mud flats, sandy beaches, mangroves, and estuaries around river mouths. The South China Sea is a major water body containing a large and diverse fish fauna. However, many areas of the South China Sea, particularly in Malaysia and Vietnam, have been poorly studied in terms of fish taxonomy and diversity. Local fish scientists and students have frequently faced difficulty when try- ing to identify fishes in their home countries. During the International Training Program of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (ITP of JSPS), two graduate students of Kagoshima University, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Repeated Evolution of Carnivory Among Indo-Australian Rodents
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12871 Repeated evolution of carnivory among Indo-Australian rodents Kevin C. Rowe,1,2 Anang S. Achmadi,3 and Jacob A. Esselstyn4,5 1Sciences Department, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Australia 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Research Center for Biology, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Cibinong, Jawa Barat, Indonesia 4Museum of Natural Science, 119 Foster Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 5Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 Received February 1, 2015 Accepted January 12, 2016 Convergent evolution, often observed in island archipelagos, provides compelling evidence for the importance of natural selection as a generator of species and ecological diversity. The Indo-Australian Archipelago (IAA) is the world’s largest island system and encompasses distinct biogeographic units, including the Asian (Sunda) and Australian (Sahul) continental shelves, which together bracket the oceanic archipelagos of the Philippines and Wallacea. Each of these biogeographic units houses numerous endemic rodents in the family Muridae. Carnivorous murids, that is those that feed on animals, have evolved independently in Sunda, Sulawesi (part of Wallacea), the Philippines, and Sahul, but the number of origins of carnivory among IAA murids is unknown. We conducted a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of carnivorous murids of the IAA, combined with estimates of ancestral states for broad diet categories (herbivore, omnivore, and carnivore) and geographic ranges. These analyses demonstrate that carnivory evolved independently four times after overwater colonization, including in situ origins on the Philippines, Sulawesi, and Sahul. In each biogeographic unit the origin of carnivory was followed by evolution of more specialized carnivorous ecomorphs such as vermivores, insectivores, and amphibious rats.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]
  • AJ Blok 2 2018 Sestava 1 8.8.2018 13:49 Stránka 3
    AJ_obalka 2_2018_Sestava 1 6.8.2018 7:44 Stránka 1 the magazine for friends of the Brno Zoo No. 2 august 2018 Brno’s Lion Cubs AJ_obalka 2_2018_Sestava 1 6.8.2018 7:44 Stránka 3 s Content Nature Protection s 04 Young Animals 14 EAZA Campaign The Story of Brno Zoo’s Lion Cubs Children Sang for Songbirds the magazin for friends of the Brno Zoo august 2018 No. 2/18, volume XX publisher four times per year MK ČR E 17723 Editor: 16 Anoona and Akashinga 16 Station for Handicapped Animals Brno Zoo and Environmental Education Lion Cubs Must Not Be Missed Annual Activities Centre, semi-budgetary organization U Zoologické zahrady 46, 635 00 Brno, Czech Republic IČ: 00101451 tel.: +420 546 432 311 fax: +420 546 210 000 e-mail: [email protected] Publisher: Moravian Museum Zelný trh 6, 659 37 Brno 08 African Village 17 SEV Hlídka Czech Republic A hoopoe in an open landscape. Photo: Petr Suvorov Blesboks Have Joined the Giraffes New Clubs for Children IČO: 00094862 and Zebras Editor’s office addres Helping Hoopoes. Zoo Brno a stanice zájmových činností, p. o. redakce Zooreportu U Zoologické zahrady 46, 635 00 Brno, Czech Republic A Special Box Hiding a Treasure tel.: +420 546 432 370 fax: +420 546 210 000 The project for the protection of Eurasian hoopoes in southern Moravia, which e-mail: [email protected] tional, in the Mediterranean, about 25 was started by Brno Zoo two years ago, has been a great success. This year, too, million birds perish every year,’ said Petr Editorial board: a couple of hoopoes have nestled in one of the boxes and have given birth to Suvorov, the Curator of Bird-Breeding 10 Unique Fish 18 Kura Kura Ing.
    [Show full text]
  • HCV Assessment for GPPOL
    Rapid Conservation Assessment Report GPPOL, Guadalcanal A.J.F.M. Dekker Consultant, Biodiversity Final Report March 2010 Disclaimer The presentation of material in this report and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the consultant concerning the legal status of any area or territory, or the delimitation of its boundaries. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the consultant and do not necessarily reflect those of GPPOL, its parent company, or the RSPO. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this report are factually correct, the author does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this report. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Guadalcanal Plains Palm Oil Limited (GPPOL) is engaged in the process of obtaining certification under the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). Certification enforces adherence to a set of Principles and Criteria (RSPO P&C), which cover operational, socio-economic, and environmental aspects. This report documents findings related to the rapid assessment of environmental conservation of the operations of GPPOL in Guadalcanal, the Solomon Islands. It is based on two short visits, from 14-25 April, and 26 July-August 3, 2009. Field surveys were carried out in five oil palm estates, and throughout the adjacent areas, with specific focus on the RSPO P&C 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 that are relevant to natural resource and biodiversity conservation, including potential High Conservation Value Areas (HCVA).
    [Show full text]
  • Diverzifikace Obratlovců Ve Východoafrických Horách - Srovnávací Přístup
    PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV BOTANIKY A ZOOLOGIE DIVERZIFIKACE OBRATLOVCŮ VE VÝCHODOAFRICKÝCH HORÁCH - SROVNÁVACÍ PŘÍSTUP Bakalářská práce Jana Jadvidžáková Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. et Mrg. Josef Bryja, Ph.D. Brno 2019 Bibliografický záznam Autor: Jana Jadvidžáková Přírodovědecká fakulta, Masarykova univerzita Ústav botaniky a zoologie Diverzifikace obratlovců ve východoafrických horách - Název práce: srovnávací přístup Studijní program: Ekologická a evoluční biologie Biologie se zaměřením na vzdělávání Studijní obor: Geografie a kartografie se zaměřením na vzdělávání Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. et Mgr. Josef Bryja, Ph.D. Akademický rok: 2018/2019 Počet stran: 50+6 Klíčová slova: diverzifikace; paleoendemiti; východní Afrika; taxonomické skupiny; obratlovci Bibliografic Entry Author: Jana Jadvidžáková Faculty of Science, Masaryk University Department of Botany and Zoology Diversification of vertebrates in East African mountains - Title of Thesis: comparative approach Degree programme: Ekological and Evolutionary Biology Biology with a view to Education Field of Study: Geography a cartography with a view to Education Supervisor: doc. Mgr. et Mgr. Josef Bryja, Ph.D. Akademic Year: 2018/2019 Number of Pages: 50+6 Keywords: diversification; paleoendemism; East Africa; taxonomic group; vertebrates Abstrakt Tato bakalářská práce se věnuje výzkumu diverzifikace obratlovců na území východní Afriky, které byla vždy jedna z nejvíce druhově bohatých oblastí na světě. Je tomu zvláště díky stabilitě klimatických podmínek po velmi dlouhou dobu, konkrétně od Miocénu. Navzdory tomuto faktu je oblast zatím velice málo prozkoumaná. Cílem této rešeršní práce bylo srovnat genetické struktury mezi jednotlivými taxony obratlovců a vyhodnotit, které z podmínek byly stěžejní pro vývoj biodiverzity na tomto území. Studie se zabývá sedmi druhy druhy obratlovců ze třech různých tříd obývajícími zejména pohoří, která vznikla v závislosti na přítomnosti Východoafrického riftového systému.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • The Living Planet Index (Lpi) for Migratory Freshwater Fish Technical Report
    THE LIVING PLANET INDEX (LPI) FOR MIGRATORY FRESHWATER FISH LIVING PLANET INDEX TECHNICAL1 REPORT LIVING PLANET INDEXTECHNICAL REPORT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are very grateful to a number of individuals and organisations who have worked with the LPD and/or shared their data. A full list of all partners and collaborators can be found on the LPI website. 2 INDEX TABLE OF CONTENTS Stefanie Deinet1, Kate Scott-Gatty1, Hannah Rotton1, PREFERRED CITATION 2 1 1 Deinet, S., Scott-Gatty, K., Rotton, H., Twardek, W. M., William M. Twardek , Valentina Marconi , Louise McRae , 5 GLOSSARY Lee J. Baumgartner3, Kerry Brink4, Julie E. Claussen5, Marconi, V., McRae, L., Baumgartner, L. J., Brink, K., Steven J. Cooke2, William Darwall6, Britas Klemens Claussen, J. E., Cooke, S. J., Darwall, W., Eriksson, B. K., Garcia Eriksson7, Carlos Garcia de Leaniz8, Zeb Hogan9, Joshua de Leaniz, C., Hogan, Z., Royte, J., Silva, L. G. M., Thieme, 6 SUMMARY 10 11, 12 13 M. L., Tickner, D., Waldman, J., Wanningen, H., Weyl, O. L. Royte , Luiz G. M. Silva , Michele L. Thieme , David Tickner14, John Waldman15, 16, Herman Wanningen4, Olaf F., Berkhuysen, A. (2020) The Living Planet Index (LPI) for 8 INTRODUCTION L. F. Weyl17, 18 , and Arjan Berkhuysen4 migratory freshwater fish - Technical Report. World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands. 1 Indicators & Assessments Unit, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society 11 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION of London, United Kingdom Edited by Mark van Heukelum 11 Data set 2 Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Design Shapeshifter.nl Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Drawings Jeroen Helmer 12 Global trend Ottawa, ON, Canada 15 Tropical and temperate zones 3 Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Photography We gratefully acknowledge all of the 17 Regions New South Wales, Australia photographers who gave us permission 20 Migration categories 4 World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands to use their photographic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Stomach Contents of Banded Archerfish, Toxotes Jaculatrix (Pallas 1767) (Toxotidae) from Brackish Waters of South Andaman, India
    Asian Fisheries Science 26 (2013): 243-250 Asian Fisheries Society ISSN 0116-6514 E-ISSN: 2073-3720 https://doi.org/10.33997/j.afs.2013.26.4.006 Stomach Contents of Banded Archerfish, Toxotes jaculatrix (Pallas 1767) (Toxotidae) from brackish waters of South Andaman, India M.P. GOUTHAM-BHARATHI1*, R. MOHANRAJU2, P. KRISHNAN3, C.R. SREERAJ3 and K.D. SIMON4,5 1Fisheries Science Division, Central Agricultural Research Institute, Post Box No. 181, Garacharma (Post), Port Blair - 744 101, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India 2Department of Ocean Studies and Marine Biology, Pondicherry University, Brookshabad Campus, Post Bag No. 26, Chakkargaon Post, Port Blair - 744 112, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India 3National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management, Anna University Campus, Chennai - 600 025, India 4School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor D. E., Malaysia 5Marine Ecosystem Research Centre (EKOMAR), Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor D. E., Malaysia Abstract Stomach contents of banded archerfish, Toxotes jaculatrix (Pallas 1767) (Toxotidae) ranging from 13-24 cm total length (TL) collected from brackish waters of South Andaman, India were examined. Brachyuran crabs were the dominant prey item with an occurrence frequency (%F) of 89 followed by insects (71). Though insects were present in all length categories, their percent composition significantly decreased from 61% in the smallest to about only 3% in the largest. Ontogenetic changes in food preferences were apparent as significant decreases in number of prey categories with increasing fish size (nine, six and three prey categories from the smallest to the largest size class) were observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Monitoring Plan
    FLORA AND FAUNA SUBCONTRACTOR’S CI MONITORING PLAN PAGE TINA RIVER HYDROPOWER HEC-CDSB-CESMP-MP-005 Rev. 5 1 OF 79 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Flora and Fauna Monitoring Plan Person Responsible HEC HSE Manager REV DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED 1 31/12/2019 Version 1 issued for Lender’s Review HEC 2 08/05/2020 Version 2 issued for OE’s Review HEC 3 02/06/2020 Version 2 issued for Lenders’ Review – HEC OE(JG) Access Road Lot 1 4 17/09/2020 Version 3 issued for Lenders’ Review – HEC OE (JG) Access Road 5 13/11/2020 Version 3 resubmitted for Lenders’ Review HEC OE (KS,JG) – Access Road FLORA AND FAUNA SUBCONTRACTOR’S CI MONITORING PLAN PAGE TINA RIVER HYDROPOWER HEC-CDSB-CESMP-MP-005 Rev. 5 2 OF 79 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision Log Date Revised Detail Rev. (dd/mm/yyyy) Item Page Article Description FLORA AND FAUNA SUBCONTRACTOR’S CI MONITORING PLAN PAGE TINA RIVER HYDROPOWER HEC-CDSB-CESMP-MP-005 Rev. 5 3 OF 79 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Project Overview ............................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Institutional and Legal Framework .................................................................................. 8 1.3.1 Institutional Framework ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]