DOCSLIB.ORG

INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION the Transformation of Society from Agricultural and Cottage Industries to Urban Factory Life Because of New Inventions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION the Transformation of Society from Agricultural and Cottage Industries to Urban Factory Life Because of New Inventions INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION The transformation of society from agricultural and cottage industries to urban factory life because of new inventions AgriculturalAgricultural RevolutionRevolution = “More Food” AgriculturalAgricultural RevolutionRevolution = “More Food” CropCrop RotationRotation – Fewer farmers needed •Lord Townshend in England introduced crop rotation – land could now be used year-round; certain crops revitalized soil EnclosedEnclosed FarmsFarms – Increased farming efficiency •Enclosure movement had large land owners buying and then fencing public land LivestockLivestock BreedingBreeding – More productive AverageAverage WeightWeight ofof SteerSteer 1700: 370 lbs 1786: 840 lbs AverageAverage WeightWeight ofof SheepSheep 1700: 28 lbs 1786: 100 lbs New inventions - “ Increased productivity and lowered prices of food” Jethro Tull’s seed drill was one of the inventions which helped improve agricultural production and led to the need for fewer workers on the farm. MoreMore ProductiveProductive – Meat and Wheat = less starvation •More food produced = population increase •Cheaper prices for food •Better nutrition (improved health care) •In 1700 there were about 100 million people in Europe, by 1800 the population had grown to over 200 million Europe Population 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 100 163 203 276 408 Smaller farmers pushed off of land to work as wage laborers for various land owners or to move to the growing cities Textile Industry Takes Off Domestic system (cottage industry) had dominated the early 1700s; merchants dropped off raw materials at people’s homes, picked up finished products later The Putting-Out System ^ The "putting-out system" was a way for 18th-century businesses to contract workers from their homes; an example of cottage industry. ^ Different parts of a product were made in the home, collected, and then assembled at a central location. ^ The main products of this system were textiles, locks, guns, and iron goods such as pots, pans, and pins. ^ In the cottage textile industry, for example, the entire family was involved in cotton yarn production: ^ Children would sort the cotton fibers in a process called carding. ^ Women would spin the fibers into threads. ^ Men would weave the threads into fabric. Series of inventions modernize textile manufacturing, including: 1733 - Flying Shuttle (John Kay) – Used to weave cloth 1767 – Spinning Jenny (James Hargreaves) – Allowed for multiple threads to be woven together 1769 – Water Frame (Richard Arkwright) – Used water to power the spinning frame 1785 – Water Loom (Edmund Cartwright) – First machine that could weave cloth The Water Wheel Grist Mill Sound A water wheel is a means of converting the kinetic energy of flowing water into mechanical energy to operate machines. Water wheels were primarily used to power grist mills for making flour. During the Industrial Revolution, Richard Arkwright used the water wheel to spin cotton thread. Later, water wheels were adapted to run many spinning machines and looms. The most powerful water wheel built in the United Kingdom was the 100 hp water wheel at Quarry Bank Mill. Water Wheels Factory Falls in Lowell Water Wheel on the Orontes River in Syria Water Wheel in New Lanark, Scotland •1793 – Cotton Gin (Eli Whitney) – Machine that separated cotton seeds from the cotton •These advancements resulted in the movement of work from the home to the factory New Inventions -“Increased Productivity and Lowered Prices” Advances in Steam “Factory Machines to Trains” James Watt developed the first practical steam engine in 1765 James Watt and Practical Steam Power James Watt was a Scottish engineer who, in 1775, modified the steam engine and made it practical for industrial use. He is credited with the invention of the sun and planet gear, a method of converting reciprocal (back and forth) motion to rotary (circular) motion. James Watt Sun and Planet Gear .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Belper Mills Site
    Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site February 2017 Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site Contents Page numbers 1 Introduction 1 2 Heritage significance 1 - 4 3 End uses 4 - 5 4 Development strategy 5 - 9 4.1 Phase 1 6 - 7 4.2 Phase 2 7 4.3 Phase 3 8 4.4 The end result 9 5 Costs of realisation 10 - 11 6 Potential financing – capital and revenue 11 - 15 6.1 Capital/realisation 11 - 12 6.2 Revenue sustainability 12 - 15 7 Delivery 15 - 16 Appendices 1 Purcell's Statement of Significance 2 Purcell's Feasibility Study Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site 1 Introduction As part of this phase of work for the Belper North Mill Trust we have, with Purcell Architects, carried out an outline masterplanning exercise for the whole Belper Mills site. At the outset, it is important to say that at the moment the site is privately owned and that while Amber Valley Borough Council initiated a Compulsory Purchase Order process in 2015, that process is still at a preliminary stage. This is a preliminary overview, based on the best available, but limited, information. In particular, access to the buildings on site has been limited; while a considerable amount of the North Mill is accessible because it is occupied, access to the East Mill, now empty, was not made available to us. Also, while we have undertaken some stakeholder consultation, we have not at this stage carried out wider consultation or public engagement, nor have we undertaken detailed market research, all of which would be essential to any next stage planning for the future of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices and Profits in Cotton Textiles During the Industrial Revolution C
    PRICES AND PROFITS IN COTTON TEXTILES DURING THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION C. Knick Harley PRICES AND PROFITS IN COTTON TEXTILES DURING THE 1 INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION C. Knick Harley Department of Economics and St. Antony’s College University of Oxford Oxford OX2 6JF UK <[email protected]> Abstract Cotton textile firms led the development of machinery-based industrialization in the Industrial Revolution. This paper presents price and profits data extracted from the accounting records of three cotton firms between the 1770s and the 1820s. The course of prices and profits in cotton textiles illumine the nature of the economic processes at work. Some historians have seen the Industrial Revolution as a Schumpeterian process in which discontinuous technological change created large profits for innovators and succeeding decades were characterized by slow diffusion. Technological secrecy and imperfect capital markets limited expansion of use of the new technology and output expanded as profits were reinvested until eventually the new technology dominated. The evidence here supports a more equilibrium view which the industry expanded rapidly and prices fell in response to technological change. Price and profit evidence indicates that expansion of the industry had led to dramatic price declines by the 1780s and there is no evidence of super profits thereafter. Keywords: Industrial Revolution, cotton textiles, prices, profits. JEL Classification Codes: N63, N83 1 I would like to thank Christine Bies provided able research assistance, participants in the session on cotton textiles for the XII Congress of the International Economic Conference in Madrid, seminars at Cambridge and Oxford and Dr Tim Leung for useful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventions in the Cotton Industry
    Inventions in the Cotton Industry Paisley Thread Mill Museum A Family of Threads John Kay: The Flying Shuttle 1733 • For centuries handloom weaving had been carried out by the shuttle with the yarn on being passed slowly and awkwardly from one hand to the other. • In 1733 John Kay patented his flying shuttle which dramatically increased the speed of this process. • Kay placed shuttle boxes at each side of the loom connected by a long board, known as a shuttle race. • With cords, a single weaver, using one hand, could knock the shuttle back and forth across the loom from one shuttle box to the other. • A weaver using Kay's flying shuttle could produce much wider cloth at much faster speeds than before. James Hargreaves: The Spinning Jenny 1764 • In 1764 Hargreaves built what became known as the Spinning- Jenny. • The machine used eight spindles onto which the thread was spun. • By turning a single wheel, the operator could now spin eight threads at once. • Later, improvements were made that enabled the number to be increased to eighty. • However, the thread that the machine produced was coarse and lacked strength. Richard Arkwright: The Water Frame 1771 • Richard Arkwright: The Water Frame 1771 • In 1762 Richard Arkwright met John Kay and Thomas Highs, who were trying to produce a new spinning- machine, to improve on the Spinning-Jenny. • Kay and Highs had run out of money and Arkwright offered to employ John Kay to make the new machine, with other, local craftsman to help. • It was not long before the team produced the Spinning-Frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Clarkson Family in England
    Our Clarkson Family in England Blanche Aubin Clarkson Hutchison Text originally written in 1994 Updated and prepared for the “Those Clarksons” website in August 2008 by Aubin Hutchison and Pam Garrett Copyright Blanche Aubin Clarkson Hutchison 2008 In any work, copyright implicitly devolves to the author of that work. Copyright arises automatically when a work is first fixed in a tangible medium such as a book or manuscript or in an electronic medium such as a computer file. Table of Contents Title Page Table of Contents Introduction 1 Finding James in America 3 James Before the American Revolution 7 Blackley Parish, Lancashire 11 A Humorous Tale 17 Stepping Back from Blackley to Garstang 19 Garstang Parish, Lancashire 23 Plans for Further Searching 31 Appendix A: Reynolds Paper 33 Appendix B: Sullivan Journal 39 Appendix C: Weaving 52 Appendix D: Blackley Parish Register 56 Our Clarkson Family in England - 1 Chapter 1: Introduction My father, Albert Luther Clarkson, and his younger brother Samuel Edwin Clarkson Jr. were the most thoughtful and courteous gentlemen I ever knew. Somewhere in their heritage and upbringing these characteristics were dominant. How I wish they were still alive to enjoy with us the new bits of family history we are finding, for clues they passed along have led to many fascinating discoveries. These two brothers, Ab and Ed as they were called, only children of SE (Ed) and Aubin Fry Clarkson, actually knew a bit more about some of their mother’s family lines. This has led to exciting finds on Fry, Anderson, Bolling, Markham, Cole, Rolfe, Fleming, Champe, Slaughter, Walker, Micou, Hutchins, Brooks, Winthrop, Pintard, and even our honored bloodline to the Princess Pocahontas and her powerful father Powhatan! These families were early in Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinning Jenny
    Spinning Jenny There were other inventors before and around the time of Richard Arkwright. The first was probably James Hargreaves from Lancashire. He invented the “Spinning Jenny” in 1864-1865 with eight and later even more spindles, which was enough to spin enough yarn to match the modern fly- shuttle. The yarn which could be produced with the Spinning Jenny, however, was not very strong. This only changed when Richard Spinning Jenny Arkwright invented the water-powered spinning frame or water frame. This was also the moment when the water from streams and rivers became essential to drive the new machines. The true origin of these inventions and the identity of the inventors is not quite clear. Especially a Mr Thomas Highs claimed that he built the Spinning Jenny and that Richard Arkwright just copied some of his ideas. Others say that John Kay, a mechanic who had worked for both, Highs and Arkwright, was the the improved Spinning Jenny rightful creator of the machines. Richard Arkwright even lost the right on his exclusive patent, which would have given him a huge advantage over every- body else. Richard Arkwright became a very impor- tant and very rich entrepreneur. If you travel around Derbyshire today you can still witness his achievements and his wealth: many of the mills, factories, workshops and houses which he owned can still be seen today. It is said, however, that he was not a very nice man and it was difficult to get along with him. Spinning frame by R. Arkwright [compiled by from information from wikipedia, some English museums and others] Spinning Jenny – Vocabulary achievement Erfolg advantage Vorteil claim behaupten, angeben entrepreneur Unternehmer especially inbesondere exclusive exklusiv get along with sb.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Teacher’S Kit
    Industrial Heritage - The Textile Industry Education Teacher’s Kit Background There is archaeological evidence of textile production in Britain from the late-prehistoric period onwards. For many thousands of years wool was the staple textile product of Britain. The dominance of wool in the British textile industry changed rapidly during the eighteenth century with the development of mechanised silk production and then mechanised cotton production. By the mid-nineteenth century all four major branches of the textile industry (cotton, wool, flax, hemp and jute and silk) had been mechanised and the British landscape was dominated by over 10,000 mill buildings with their distinctive chimneys. Overseas competition led to a decline in the textile industry in the mid-twentieth century. Today woollen production is once again the dominant part of the sector together with artificial and man-made fibres, although output is much reduced from historic levels. Innovation Thomas Lombe’s silk mill, built in 1721, is regarded as the first factory-based textile mill in Britain. However, it was not until the handloom was developed following the introduction of John Kay’s flying shuttle in 1733 that other branches of the textile industry (notably cotton and wool) became increasingly mechanised. In the second half of the eighteenth century, a succession of major innovations including James Hargreaves’s spinning jenny (1764), Richard Arkwright’s water frame (1769), his carding engine (1775), and Samuel Crompton’s mule (1779), revolutionised the preparation and spinning of cotton and wool and led to the establishment of textile factories where several machines were housed under one roof.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 20Th APRIL 1973
    468 THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 20th APRIL 1973 Alliance Box Co. (Scotland) Ltd., Hamiltonhill Works, Saracen Cooke Sons & Co. (Hillington) Ltd., Watt Road Hin - Street, Glasgow. Industrial Estate, Glasgow. ' m ington Allied Industrial Services Ltd., Perseverance Mills, Richmond Co-operative Tea Society Ltd., Ordsall Lane, Salford. Road, Bradford. Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd., Hambledon Mill Angloprint Ltd., North Street, Huthwaite. borough Road, Accrington. ' George Angus & Co. Ltd., Bentham, Lancaster. The Country Maid Bakeries Ltd., Chester Road, Saltnev Sir Richard Arkwright & Co. (English Sewing Ltd.—Spinning Chester. " Division), Bridgewater Mill, Worsley Street, Pendlebury. Samuel Courtauld & Co. Ltd., The Causeway, Halstead. Ashe Laboratories Ltd., Land Lake Works, Shore, Littleborough. Courtaulds Ltd., Imperial Mill, Gorse Street, Blackburn. Thomas Ashworth & Co .Ltd., Sycamore Avenue, Burnley. Cross Paperware Ltd. (Packaging Division), Cleator Mill, Cleat D. Charles Astle Ltd., Thornham Mill, Oozewood Road, Royton, Cumberland Filter Co. Ltd., Leconfield Estate, Cleator Moor Oldham. Da r U Ce PackerS Ltd Nathan Way Wo Avana Bakeries Ltd., Avana Buildings, Pendyris Street, Cardiff. ^rt^ °c T; -,Q " > «lwich Industrial Bakelite Xylonite Ltd. (Cascelloid Division), Abbey Lane, Leic- ester; Plenmeler Factory, Haltwhistle and West Street, Stam- Data Recording Instrument Co. Ltd., The Glanty, Egham. ford. The Dawson Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Parkside Mill Fdewc Banister Bros. & Co. Ltd., Bee Mill, Ribchester, Nr. Preston. Street, Royton. ' A. E. Bangham & Co. Ltd., Stoddart Street, Ne wcas tie-upon- Deeko Ltd., Garman Road, Tottenham, N.17. Tyne. Donaldson Bros. (Alloa 1937) Ltd., Lornshill, Alloa. Batchelors Foods Ltd., Kennington Road, Willesborough, Ash- Downs, Coulter & Co. Ltd., Thornton Mills, West Lane, Brad- ford. XU& \Am B. & B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arkwrights
    THE ARKWRIGHTS The Industrial Re30lution at Stockport and Marple GEORGE UNWIN, M.A., M.Com. ~rofuirof Economic History in the U?lioersity of Manche~ter with Chapters by ARTHUR HULME and GEORGE TAYLOR, M.A. MANCHESTER - - AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, NEW YORK, 8rC. LONGMANS, GREEN & CO. '924 PREFACE Publications of the Utzio~rjityof Manckerter HREE leading contemporary authorities on the No. CLXII. early history of the cotton industry and of the Tfactory system-Robert Owen, William Radcliffe, and John Kennedy-agree in attributing considerable im- portance to the achievements of Samuel Oldknow, who first turned the new spinning inventions to full account by the production of finer cotton fabrics in successful rivalry with the East. In his delightful autobiogl-aptly, Owe11 has told us how, soon after he became an apprentice in Mr. McGuffog's shop at Stamford, Oldknow's British Mull Muslins beean4 to disvlace those of Indian manu- facture and were eagerly bought up by the nobility at half-a-guinea a yard. His subsequent account of Oldknow's beginnings as a master spinner anti of how " the handsonle and imposing mill at Mellor " proved a stumbling block to the ardent young Welshman's earliest ambitions will be found recorded in this book in Owen's inimitable style. This cotton mill. which ~assedinto the hands of the Arkwright family, has destroyed by fire in I 892, and has since that date been a picturesque and interesting ruin. A detached portion, however, lying by the river-side and within a stone's-throw of the residence built bv Oldknow.
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 100 the Derwent Valley 100 95 95
    DERWENT VALLEY MILLS DERWENT VALLEY 100 The Derwent Valley 100 95 95 75 The Valley that changed the World 75 25 DERWENT VALLEY MILLS WORLD HERITAGE SITE 25 5 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 5 0 0 Edited by David Knight Inscriptions on UNESCO's SITE RESEARCH FRAMEWORK WORLD HERITAGE prestigious World Heritage List are based on detailed research into the sites' evolution and histories. The role of research does not end with the presentation of the nomination or indeed the inscription itself, which is rst and foremost a starting point. UNESCO believes that continuing research is also central to the preservation and interpretation of all such sites. I therefore wholeheartedly welcome the publication of this document, which will act as a springboard for future investigation. Dr Mechtild Rössler, Director of the UNESCO Division for Heritage and the UNESCO World Heritage Centre 100 100 95 95 75 75 ONIO MU IM N R D T IA A L P W L O A I 25 R 25 D L D N H O E M R E I T I N A O GE IM 5 PATR 5 United Nations Derwent Valley Mills Educational, Scientific and inscribed on the World 0 Cultural Organisation Heritage List in 2001 0 Designed and produced by Derbyshire County Council, County Hall, Matlock Derbyshire DE4 3AG Research Framework cover spread print 17 August 2016 14:18:36 100 100 95 95 DERWENT VALLEY MILLS WORLD HERITAGE SITE 75 75 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 25 25 5 Edited by David Knight 5 0 0 Watercolour of Cromford, looking upstream from the bridge across the River Derwent, painted by William Day in 1789.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Some Issuers of Countermarked Spanish Dollars
    NOTES ON SOME ISSUERS OF COUNTERMARKED SPANISH DOLLARS By S. A. H. WHETMORE THIS paper is an attempt to comply with the wishes of Presidents of the Society, expressed more than once, that more attention should be given to modern coins. It deals with some of the issuers in Great Britain, at the time of the Industrial Revolution, of Spanish pieces of eight reales—so-called Spanish dollars—suitably countermarked for the issuers' purposes. Information regarding the issuers is uneven in quantity. Further investigation would, no doubt, produce more knowledge, but perhaps the time has come to record what has been found. I have followed the territorial classification of W. J. Davis,1 except where it has been convenient to group some of the Scottish cotton mills together, as their development was due to the enterprise of a few persons. The descriptions of the countermarks given by Davis, when he knew them, are quoted, with such comment as seems neces- sary ; and references are made to the catalogues of the more important collections of this century, viz. J. G. Murdoch (1904), T. Bliss (1916), W. J. Davis (1924), A. Thellusson (1931), H. E. G. Paget (1944), F. Cokayne (1946), and H. M. Lingford (1950). Information from these and other catalogues of dates of dollars, and dates of first appearance of countermarks, is of interest. It is sometimes stated in the narrative that coins known in the early part of the century have not been noted since. Perhaps they passed into the possession of Mr. Cokayne and were permanently lost when his first collection was stolen.
    [Show full text]
  • Textile Industry and the Factory System
    What might be the advantages of factory weaving WhatWhatWhat isWhat the are are boy dothe the you inmachines workers the see machine here? doing?doing? doing? over cottage industry weaving? This is a picture of workers at the mule- spinning machines making cotton cloth in an English textile mill in 1834. The Textile Industry Invented Textiles: any cloth or goods produced by weaving, knitting or felting. The textile industry developed as a way to solve the problems of the putting-out system (cottage industries) and increase productivity and efficiency. The markets continued to demand more cloth, and the rural workers spinning yarn by hand and weaving cloth on a hand loom could not keep up. Notes: Textile Industry Invented: Cottage industry couldn’t keep up with the demand for textiles. 1767: James Hargreaves invented a compound spinning wheel. It was able to spin 16 threads at one time. He named this invention the Spinning Jenny, after his wife, Jenny. 1769: Richard Arkwright improved on the spinning wheel with his invention of the water frame. This machine involved winding thread through four pairs of rollers operating at varying speeds. What powers the water frame? A water wheel powered the water frame. What might be the advantages of the water frame? What might be the disadvantages of the water frame? 1779: Samuel Crompton made a further improvement on the spinning wheel. By using the mobile carriage of the spinning jenny and the rollers of the water frame, Crompton created a new machine that was able to spin strong yarn, yet also thin enough to be used in the finest fabrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Weaving a Fascinating Historical Tale 1/24/05 11:51 AM
    USATODAY.com - Weaving a fascinating historical tale 1/24/05 11:51 AM Powered by SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close Weaving a fascinating historical tale By Lyn Millner, Special for USA TODAY Did you know that dollar bills are made mostly of cotton blue-jean remnants? That ice cream is thickened with cotton's ground-up short fibers? That cottonseed, in its natural state, is poisonous? That gossypol, cotton's toxic pigment, has been used as a male contraceptive in China? 'Big Cotton: How a Humble Fiber Created Fortunes, Wrecked Civilizations, and Put America on the Map,' by Stephen Yafa; Viking, 398 pages, $25.95. These and other surprising facts begin Big Cotton, Stephen Yafa's history of a fiber we rarely stop to consider even though, chances are, each of us is touching something made of cotton right now. (Excerpt: 'Big Cotton') How did cotton become the so-called fabric of our lives? The story begins 5,500 years ago, when people in South America, Asia and Africa domesticated the plant and arrived at the process for cleaning, spinning and weaving it. They did so independently in cultures isolated from one another. Centuries later, when Columbus arrived in the New World, this contributed to his major miscalculation. He saw people wearing cotton cloth and took it as further evidence that he was off the coast of India. (As any European could have told you then, there was plenty of cotton in India.) While cotton played only a bit part in Columbus' story, it was much more influential in other ways.
    [Show full text]