DOCSLIB.ORG

VISION January 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A 4-star council Awarded top marks by the Audit Commission January 2008 OH YEA, OH YEAVISION ONLINE FROM THE HEART Take a fresh look at Enter competitions and Teens share historic Lancashire write to us online their feelings Page 5 www.lancashire.gov.uk/corporate/vision page 7 ROAD CHAOS: ENDINSIGHTto issue £60 penalty charge notices, which should be a strong deterrent. Time for action - “I have seen cars parked two abreast outside some schools – with headteacher Legal move to end children trying to navigate their way through the traffic. It is shock- HOLY Trinity CE Primary School is ing and completely selfish. one of dozens, possibly hundreds, “Many headteachers are sick of of schools county-wide which will writing to parents asking for some benefit from extra enforcement of consideration. It is about time that school “zig-zag” zones. school-gate anarchy something was done.” John Aspin, headteacher at the Surveys have already been Stacksteads school, said: “I have A COUNTY council clamp- (TROs) for 2008 will make it easier “Some would drive their car right ordered to ensure that zig-zag road- sent many letters to parents telling down against dangerous for parking attendants to enforce into the school hall if they could. marks and signs are up to legal them to park considerately. It some- times works – but doesn’t last. parking is set to boost safe- parking restrictions on zig-zags. Parents, pupils and teachers are standards at all of Lancashire’s County Councillor Tony Martin, the winners in this move. 600-plus schools. “Some parents drop their children ty at the school gates. Cabinet member for Sustainable “It has always been an offence to The TROs will be introduced on a off on the zig-zags. They think it will Many parts of Lancashire have Development, said: “People have park on zig-zags, but – until now – district-by-district basis. By late only take a few seconds – but park- schools where drivers ignore zig- complained for years that a minori- parking attendants have only been spring, schools in every part of the ing there causes a danger to other zag “safety zones” in front of school ty of selfish parents park their cars able to inform the police, giving the county will be included. Until then people trying to cross the road. gates. The resulting congestion is right next to the gates, making it offender the chance to drive away. – and after then – the existing “Almost every school can report a danger to children. very dangerous for children trying “The changes will mean that offence of obstruction will continue near-misses and some have actually But new traffic regulation orders to cross the road. parking attendants will now be able to be enforced by police. had children being hit by cars.” A cassette version of Vision is now available for visually impaired people from Galloway’s Society for the Blind by calling 01772 744148 The presence of promotional leaflets delivered inside Vision does not imply Lancashire County Council endorsement. YOUR LANCASHIRE: A PLACE WHERE EVERYONE MATTERS 2 January 2008 Providing • food safety • welfare advice www.lancashire.gov.uk A full job description of all vacancies is available on our website www.lancashire.gov.uk/vacancies ASK THE EXPERT Car use Questions answered by your falls by 13 friend in the know per cent Road repairs About seven years ago I bought a house on quite Travel plans extended a large, new housing estate. The estate was after South Ribble shows completed four years ago and the developer moved public transport can work off site. I have just found out that our street has still By Martin Crabtree not been adopted by Lancashire County CAR trips in South Ribble were slashed Council, so therefore by 13 per cent following a marketing they are not responsible exercise carried out under the CIVITAS for repairs. There are NEED to get rid of something? Recycling centres are the way to go. SUCCESS banner. problems on the road The project is now being extended to parts of and several streetlights process is underway. For much rubbish as possi- from nothing to £1,000s Preston, Lancaster and Morecambe to relieve con- do not work. any existing defects you ble so you should be depending on the work gestion on the roads. I have spoken to the will have to contact your able recycle your card- carried out and the eli- The TravelSmart project involved making direct developer but still noth- developer again. board and old units, but gibility criteria used for contact with households by phone and on the ing has been done. How if you’re in any doubt the grant. doorstep to offer personalised information and advice do residents get this Learn to drive just ask one of the A lot of the grants are on the best ways to travel. road adopted? My daughter is plan- “Here To Help” staff dependent on the work Help included individually tailored local bus Mr N, Chorley ning to learn to drive available on all the being carried out by an timetables and discounts on cycles. this year. sites. approved installer. County Councillor Tony Martin, Cabinet member To get the road adopted, Is there any information Even where work has for Sustainable Development, said: “The project has the person who owns available to help her get Childcare been carried out at lim- shown that by making better use of public transport the road (most likely the started? My family and I have ited or no cost, you are information and taking steps to promote alternatives developer) has to apply Mrs R, Preston recently moved to entitled for it to have to the car, we can achieve great results. for what is known as Preston and I am look- been done properly and “This 13 per cent would go a long way towards “Section 38” Lancashire County ing to find a local child- effectively. tackling traffic congestion Agreement”. Council Road Safety minder who can look It is normally the and climate change if it Easy travel This is the process that Group's Pre-Pass after my two young chil- responsibility of the were repeated across the has to be gone through Support scheme helps dren. Where can I find installer to correct country.” Make your journeys simpler by the land owner to get learners and friends and their details and how defects. The South Ribble cam- - by leaving your car at Don’t know who to a road adopted. family planning to much will they cost? The initial complaint paign involved more than home. contact when you Developers who wish to accompany them on Mr M, Preston should be made to the 10,700 households. Visit: www.transportfor need help? build a road to be main- practice sessions. installer directly but, if Evaluation of the proj- lancashire.com tained by the council There is the opportunity The Childcare this is not successful, ect has shown that people for timetable information Baffled by will normally be expect- to attend a free course Information Service will should be escalated to increased their walking and a link to a journey bureaucracy? ed to enter into an and receive a free be happy to help you. Warmfront. by up to 45 per cent, planner. Agreement under CD-ROM. You can contact them on Complaints should be cycling by 75 per cent and Ring Shirley on Section 38 of the For more information 0800 1950137 or email made by, or on behalf public transport use by 10 Visit www.civitas-initia 0845 0530000 or email Highway Act 1980, a call 01772 530316 or them at: childcare of, the customer to: per cent - resulting in a tive.org Shirley on enquiries@ function that is under- email roadsafety@env. informationservice@ 1) the contact centre on 13 per cent reduction in for a wider view of transport css.lancscc.gov.uk taken by district coun- lancscc.gov.uk csc.lancscc.gov.uk 0800 3166011; car-driver trips. in the future. cils on behalf of They can produce a per- 2) If unable to resolve, Write to: Lancashire Highways. Permit worries sonalised list of child- it should be referred to Ask Shirley Before this process the I have fitted a new care providers that can the customer services Museum steams ahead Customer Service Centre road has to be brought kitchen in my home and be posted or e-mailed to team on 0800 408 0392; The Red Rose Hub up to Lancashire as a result I have a you. Details should 3) It could be escalated Bluebell Way County Council’s adop- large amount of rubbish include contact num- to a manager or: Preston tion standard. Please which I need to take to bers, available working 4) It can be escalated PR2 5PZ contact Lancashire the tip. hours and cost. Local, for a written response Highways on Do I need a permit in registered providers can to: Customer Response 0845 order to get rid of it and, also be found on the Team, Eaga House, 0530011 if so, how do I go about web at www.child Archbold Terrace, who can getting one? carelink.gov.uk/ Newcastle upon Tyne inform Mr K, Carnforth lancashire. For details NE2 1DB. you if about available places If this process is the Lancashire’s Household you should then contact followed, and it fails, Waste Recycling Centres the childminder directly. Trading Standards can are open daily from 8am pursue the complaint. to 7pm except Christmas Boiler help Day, Boxing Day and I have had a grant GAWARD for bringing history to life: from left, Ian Gibson, New Year’s Day.
Recommended publications
  • Belper Mills Site

    Belper Mills Site

    Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site February 2017 Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site Contents Page numbers 1 Introduction 1 2 Heritage significance 1 - 4 3 End uses 4 - 5 4 Development strategy 5 - 9 4.1 Phase 1 6 - 7 4.2 Phase 2 7 4.3 Phase 3 8 4.4 The end result 9 5 Costs of realisation 10 - 11 6 Potential financing – capital and revenue 11 - 15 6.1 Capital/realisation 11 - 12 6.2 Revenue sustainability 12 - 15 7 Delivery 15 - 16 Appendices 1 Purcell's Statement of Significance 2 Purcell's Feasibility Study Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site 1 Introduction As part of this phase of work for the Belper North Mill Trust we have, with Purcell Architects, carried out an outline masterplanning exercise for the whole Belper Mills site. At the outset, it is important to say that at the moment the site is privately owned and that while Amber Valley Borough Council initiated a Compulsory Purchase Order process in 2015, that process is still at a preliminary stage. This is a preliminary overview, based on the best available, but limited, information. In particular, access to the buildings on site has been limited; while a considerable amount of the North Mill is accessible because it is occupied, access to the East Mill, now empty, was not made available to us. Also, while we have undertaken some stakeholder consultation, we have not at this stage carried out wider consultation or public engagement, nor have we undertaken detailed market research, all of which would be essential to any next stage planning for the future of the site.
  • Prices and Profits in Cotton Textiles During the Industrial Revolution C

    Prices and Profits in Cotton Textiles During the Industrial Revolution C

    PRICES AND PROFITS IN COTTON TEXTILES DURING THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION C. Knick Harley PRICES AND PROFITS IN COTTON TEXTILES DURING THE 1 INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION C. Knick Harley Department of Economics and St. Antony’s College University of Oxford Oxford OX2 6JF UK <[email protected]> Abstract Cotton textile firms led the development of machinery-based industrialization in the Industrial Revolution. This paper presents price and profits data extracted from the accounting records of three cotton firms between the 1770s and the 1820s. The course of prices and profits in cotton textiles illumine the nature of the economic processes at work. Some historians have seen the Industrial Revolution as a Schumpeterian process in which discontinuous technological change created large profits for innovators and succeeding decades were characterized by slow diffusion. Technological secrecy and imperfect capital markets limited expansion of use of the new technology and output expanded as profits were reinvested until eventually the new technology dominated. The evidence here supports a more equilibrium view which the industry expanded rapidly and prices fell in response to technological change. Price and profit evidence indicates that expansion of the industry had led to dramatic price declines by the 1780s and there is no evidence of super profits thereafter. Keywords: Industrial Revolution, cotton textiles, prices, profits. JEL Classification Codes: N63, N83 1 I would like to thank Christine Bies provided able research assistance, participants in the session on cotton textiles for the XII Congress of the International Economic Conference in Madrid, seminars at Cambridge and Oxford and Dr Tim Leung for useful comments.
  • Colne BID Limited AGM Agenda

    Colne BID Limited AGM Agenda

    Tuesday 23rd February 2021 6pm Colne BID Limited AGM Agenda • Directors report • Board Director Elections • BID Officer Update: Promote, Pride, Protect, Partnership, ERDF • CYAG Presentation • Any Questions? Director’s Report Delivered by Stuart Wilson Current Board Members: • Stuart Wilson of Coversure Insurance – Chair • Jane Turner of Tubbs of Colne – Vice Chair • Nicola Holding of Create Studios • Ash Metcalfe of Sainsburys • Jo'anne Greenwoood of Swankies Director • Mark Bateman of The Bookshop Election • Kevin Mason of Pendle Hippodrome • Christina Cope of Pendleside Hospice • Cllr. David Clegg, Pendle Borough Council Representative Nominations • Norma Tinsley of Santander Promote Current Activity • Virtual High Street • Leaflet Distribution - Christmas for VHS • Marketing Lancashire Membership • Social Media Campaigns – project by project (roadmap activity etc) Future Plans • Christmas in Colne • Colne Markets • Local / National PR engagement Pride Current Activity • Fresh Lick of Paint: 4 approvals and 6 spaces left • Former Zebras and Higgin Chamber • Street Cleaning on Skipton road and Hartley Square • Engagement with local estate agents keeping empty units to a minimum Future Plans • Ongoing street cleaning during our term throughout the high street • Colne’s clean up day • Monthly litter picks and pledging minutes to Keep Britain Tidy Protect Current Activity • Pledged £10k per year to Colne Youth Action Group (CYAG) • Paying for a new CCTV camera • Future Plans • Shopwatch • Crime Group for North Valley • ANPR Cameras along
  • Inventions in the Cotton Industry

    Inventions in the Cotton Industry

    Inventions in the Cotton Industry Paisley Thread Mill Museum A Family of Threads John Kay: The Flying Shuttle 1733 • For centuries handloom weaving had been carried out by the shuttle with the yarn on being passed slowly and awkwardly from one hand to the other. • In 1733 John Kay patented his flying shuttle which dramatically increased the speed of this process. • Kay placed shuttle boxes at each side of the loom connected by a long board, known as a shuttle race. • With cords, a single weaver, using one hand, could knock the shuttle back and forth across the loom from one shuttle box to the other. • A weaver using Kay's flying shuttle could produce much wider cloth at much faster speeds than before. James Hargreaves: The Spinning Jenny 1764 • In 1764 Hargreaves built what became known as the Spinning- Jenny. • The machine used eight spindles onto which the thread was spun. • By turning a single wheel, the operator could now spin eight threads at once. • Later, improvements were made that enabled the number to be increased to eighty. • However, the thread that the machine produced was coarse and lacked strength. Richard Arkwright: The Water Frame 1771 • Richard Arkwright: The Water Frame 1771 • In 1762 Richard Arkwright met John Kay and Thomas Highs, who were trying to produce a new spinning- machine, to improve on the Spinning-Jenny. • Kay and Highs had run out of money and Arkwright offered to employ John Kay to make the new machine, with other, local craftsman to help. • It was not long before the team produced the Spinning-Frame.
  • Authority's Monitoring Report (AMR)

    Authority's Monitoring Report (AMR)

    Local Plan for Pendle Authority’s Monitoring Report (AMR) st 1 April 2015 st to 31 March 2016 For an alternative format of this document phone 01282 661330 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 2. Spatial Portrait ..................................................................................................... 5 3. Local Development Scheme Review ...................................................................... 9 4. Duty to Co-operate ............................................................................................ 16 5. Topic Areas ........................................................................................................ 24 Spatial Development and Infrastructure .................................................................... 24 Environment (including Renewable Energy and Transport) ....................................... 30 Living: Creating a Vibrant Housing Market ................................................................. 63 Economy (including Retailing and Town Centres) ...................................................... 92 Community ............................................................................................................... 115 Appendices Appendix A: Local Development Scheme Timetable Appendix B: Data Collection Methodology Appendix C: Document / Indicator Index Appendix D: SHLAA Update Appendix E: Five Year Supply Calculation Appendix F: Employment Land Review Update
  • Cotton and the Community: Exploring Changing Concepts of Identity and Community on Lancashire’S Cotton Frontier C.1890-1950

    Cotton and the Community: Exploring Changing Concepts of Identity and Community on Lancashire’S Cotton Frontier C.1890-1950

    Cotton and the Community: Exploring Changing Concepts of Identity and Community on Lancashire’s Cotton Frontier c.1890-1950 By Jack Southern A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements for the degree of a PhD, at the University of Central Lancashire April 2016 1 i University of Central Lancashire STUDENT DECLARATION FORM I declare that whilst being registered as a candidate of the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another aware of the University or other academic or professional institution. I declare that no material contained in this thesis has been used for any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work. Signature of Candidate ________________________________________________ Type of Award: Doctor of Philosophy School: Education and Social Sciences ii ABSTRACT This thesis explores the evolution of identity and community within north east Lancashire during a period when the area gained regional and national prominence through its involvement in the cotton industry. It examines how the overarching shared culture of the area could evolve under altering economic conditions, and how expressions of identity fluctuated through the cotton industry’s peak and decline. In effect, it explores how local populations could shape and be shaped by the cotton industry. By focusing on a compact area with diverse settlements, this thesis contributes to the wider understanding of what it was to live in an area dominated by a single industry. The complex legacy that the cotton industry’s decline has had is explored through a range of settlement types, from large town to small village.
  • 2546 the London Gazette, Sth April 1960

    2546 the London Gazette, Sth April 1960

    2546 THE LONDON GAZETTE, STH APRIL 1960 Igali Limited Copies of the draft Order may be inspected by any person free of charge at all reasonable hours during J. J. Supply Co. Limited a period of twenty-eight days from the 8th April J. M. O'Kelly Limited 1960, at: John Jamieson (Holborn) (Limited the Ministry of Housing and (Local Government, Johnston-Carlton (Surrey) Limited Whitehall, London S.W.I ; Joseph King & Sons {Civil Engineers) Limited ithe offices of Accrington 'Borough (Council, Town Hall, Accrington ; Kandel & Co. (Sales) Limited the offices of Haslingden Borough Council, (Muni- cipal Offices, Haslingden,; Les Brodie (The Tailor) Limited •the offices of Church Urban .District Council, Lindibarry Fabrics Limited Church ; L. P. Brown and Sons Limited the offices of Clayton-le-iMoors Urban District L. W. Brunswick & Company Limited Council, Clayton-le-Moors ; the offices of Great Harwood Urban District Maddock's Sales (Wolstanton) Limited Council, Town Hall, Great Harwood ; Magyar Shoes (Treforest) Limited the offices of Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council, Manor (Wholesale) (Limited Town Hall, Oswaldtwistle; Marfab Limited ithe offices of 'Padiham Urban District Council, Town Mary Dick Limited Hall, (Padiham; Metaframe Construction Company Limited the offices of Rishton Urban District Council, Mirmett (Caterers) Limited JRishtoni; Morgan Birley Limited the offices of (Burnley Rural District Council, Reedley, near Burnley. N. J. Darling (Collapsible Containers) Limited A notice explaining the effect of the Order will be •found in -the issues of .the Accrington Observer and Office Services (Cambridge) Limited Times, the Burnley Express and News and the Lan- Oznel Couplings Limited cashire Evening Post for the 9th April 1960, the issue Parkstone Engraving Company Limited' of the Blackburn Times for the 8th April 1960 and P.
  • Our Clarkson Family in England

    Our Clarkson Family in England

    Our Clarkson Family in England Blanche Aubin Clarkson Hutchison Text originally written in 1994 Updated and prepared for the “Those Clarksons” website in August 2008 by Aubin Hutchison and Pam Garrett Copyright Blanche Aubin Clarkson Hutchison 2008 In any work, copyright implicitly devolves to the author of that work. Copyright arises automatically when a work is first fixed in a tangible medium such as a book or manuscript or in an electronic medium such as a computer file. Table of Contents Title Page Table of Contents Introduction 1 Finding James in America 3 James Before the American Revolution 7 Blackley Parish, Lancashire 11 A Humorous Tale 17 Stepping Back from Blackley to Garstang 19 Garstang Parish, Lancashire 23 Plans for Further Searching 31 Appendix A: Reynolds Paper 33 Appendix B: Sullivan Journal 39 Appendix C: Weaving 52 Appendix D: Blackley Parish Register 56 Our Clarkson Family in England - 1 Chapter 1: Introduction My father, Albert Luther Clarkson, and his younger brother Samuel Edwin Clarkson Jr. were the most thoughtful and courteous gentlemen I ever knew. Somewhere in their heritage and upbringing these characteristics were dominant. How I wish they were still alive to enjoy with us the new bits of family history we are finding, for clues they passed along have led to many fascinating discoveries. These two brothers, Ab and Ed as they were called, only children of SE (Ed) and Aubin Fry Clarkson, actually knew a bit more about some of their mother’s family lines. This has led to exciting finds on Fry, Anderson, Bolling, Markham, Cole, Rolfe, Fleming, Champe, Slaughter, Walker, Micou, Hutchins, Brooks, Winthrop, Pintard, and even our honored bloodline to the Princess Pocahontas and her powerful father Powhatan! These families were early in Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and Virginia.

  • Spinning Jenny

    Spinning Jenny There were other inventors before and around the time of Richard Arkwright. The first was probably James Hargreaves from Lancashire. He invented the “Spinning Jenny” in 1864-1865 with eight and later even more spindles, which was enough to spin enough yarn to match the modern fly- shuttle. The yarn which could be produced with the Spinning Jenny, however, was not very strong. This only changed when Richard Spinning Jenny Arkwright invented the water-powered spinning frame or water frame. This was also the moment when the water from streams and rivers became essential to drive the new machines. The true origin of these inventions and the identity of the inventors is not quite clear. Especially a Mr Thomas Highs claimed that he built the Spinning Jenny and that Richard Arkwright just copied some of his ideas. Others say that John Kay, a mechanic who had worked for both, Highs and Arkwright, was the the improved Spinning Jenny rightful creator of the machines. Richard Arkwright even lost the right on his exclusive patent, which would have given him a huge advantage over every- body else. Richard Arkwright became a very impor- tant and very rich entrepreneur. If you travel around Derbyshire today you can still witness his achievements and his wealth: many of the mills, factories, workshops and houses which he owned can still be seen today. It is said, however, that he was not a very nice man and it was difficult to get along with him. Spinning frame by R. Arkwright [compiled by from information from wikipedia, some English museums and others] Spinning Jenny – Vocabulary achievement Erfolg advantage Vorteil claim behaupten, angeben entrepreneur Unternehmer especially inbesondere exclusive exklusiv get along with sb.
  • Burnley Task Force Report

    Burnley Task Force Report

    BURNLEY TASK FORCE Page No CONTENTS 1-3 LISTEN TO US 4 PREFACE 5-6 CHAIR’S INTRODUCTION 7-9 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLAN 10-23 MAPS OF BURNLEY 24-26 SECTION 1 1.1 The origins of the Task Force, its 27-30 Membership and Terms of Reference 1.2 The First Meeting 30-31 1.3 The Consultation Process 31-34 SECTION 2 2.1. What Happened? 35-36 2.2. Why Did it Happen? 36-37 SECTION 3 3.1. Submissions and Task Force Responses 38-39 3.2. Housing 39-47 3.2.1. Ways Forward 3.2.2. Housing Market Renewal Fund 3.2.3. Partnership Management 3.2.4. The Borough’s Approach 3.2.5. Information from other Local Authorities 3.2.6. Private Landlords Page 1 of 87 3.2.7. Housing and Landlords Associations 3.3. Community Relations 4753 3.3.1. Funding of Race Relations Work 3.3.2. The Politicisation of Race 3.3.3. The Asian Heritage Communities 3.3.4. The White Community 3.4. Community and Voluntary Sector 54-57 3.5. Burnley Borough Council 58-62 3.5.1. Council’s Submission 3.6. Police 63-65 3.7. Summary of Newspaper Media Analysis 65-67 3.8. Education 67-68 3.9. Young People 68-77 3.9.1. How the Young People’s Group Operated 3.9.2. How the views of Young People were Obtained 3.9.3. Young People’s Questionnaire 3.9.4. Web Page and ROBOT 3.9.5.
  • Education Teacher’S Kit

    Education Teacher’S Kit

    Industrial Heritage - The Textile Industry Education Teacher’s Kit Background There is archaeological evidence of textile production in Britain from the late-prehistoric period onwards. For many thousands of years wool was the staple textile product of Britain. The dominance of wool in the British textile industry changed rapidly during the eighteenth century with the development of mechanised silk production and then mechanised cotton production. By the mid-nineteenth century all four major branches of the textile industry (cotton, wool, flax, hemp and jute and silk) had been mechanised and the British landscape was dominated by over 10,000 mill buildings with their distinctive chimneys. Overseas competition led to a decline in the textile industry in the mid-twentieth century. Today woollen production is once again the dominant part of the sector together with artificial and man-made fibres, although output is much reduced from historic levels. Innovation Thomas Lombe’s silk mill, built in 1721, is regarded as the first factory-based textile mill in Britain. However, it was not until the handloom was developed following the introduction of John Kay’s flying shuttle in 1733 that other branches of the textile industry (notably cotton and wool) became increasingly mechanised. In the second half of the eighteenth century, a succession of major innovations including James Hargreaves’s spinning jenny (1764), Richard Arkwright’s water frame (1769), his carding engine (1775), and Samuel Crompton’s mule (1779), revolutionised the preparation and spinning of cotton and wool and led to the establishment of textile factories where several machines were housed under one roof.
  • THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 20Th APRIL 1973

    THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 20Th APRIL 1973

    468 THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 20th APRIL 1973 Alliance Box Co. (Scotland) Ltd., Hamiltonhill Works, Saracen Cooke Sons & Co. (Hillington) Ltd., Watt Road Hin - Street, Glasgow. Industrial Estate, Glasgow. ' m ington Allied Industrial Services Ltd., Perseverance Mills, Richmond Co-operative Tea Society Ltd., Ordsall Lane, Salford. Road, Bradford. Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd., Hambledon Mill Angloprint Ltd., North Street, Huthwaite. borough Road, Accrington. ' George Angus & Co. Ltd., Bentham, Lancaster. The Country Maid Bakeries Ltd., Chester Road, Saltnev Sir Richard Arkwright & Co. (English Sewing Ltd.—Spinning Chester. " Division), Bridgewater Mill, Worsley Street, Pendlebury. Samuel Courtauld & Co. Ltd., The Causeway, Halstead. Ashe Laboratories Ltd., Land Lake Works, Shore, Littleborough. Courtaulds Ltd., Imperial Mill, Gorse Street, Blackburn. Thomas Ashworth & Co .Ltd., Sycamore Avenue, Burnley. Cross Paperware Ltd. (Packaging Division), Cleator Mill, Cleat D. Charles Astle Ltd., Thornham Mill, Oozewood Road, Royton, Cumberland Filter Co. Ltd., Leconfield Estate, Cleator Moor Oldham. Da r U Ce PackerS Ltd Nathan Way Wo Avana Bakeries Ltd., Avana Buildings, Pendyris Street, Cardiff. ^rt^ °c T; -,Q " > «lwich Industrial Bakelite Xylonite Ltd. (Cascelloid Division), Abbey Lane, Leic- ester; Plenmeler Factory, Haltwhistle and West Street, Stam- Data Recording Instrument Co. Ltd., The Glanty, Egham. ford. The Dawson Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Parkside Mill Fdewc Banister Bros. & Co. Ltd., Bee Mill, Ribchester, Nr. Preston. Street, Royton. ' A. E. Bangham & Co. Ltd., Stoddart Street, Ne wcas tie-upon- Deeko Ltd., Garman Road, Tottenham, N.17. Tyne. Donaldson Bros. (Alloa 1937) Ltd., Lornshill, Alloa. Batchelors Foods Ltd., Kennington Road, Willesborough, Ash- Downs, Coulter & Co. Ltd., Thornton Mills, West Lane, Brad- ford. XU& \Am B. & B.