Scientific Goals for Exploration of the Outer Solar System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Topography of Iapetus' Leading Side
Icarus 193 (2008) 359–371 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus The topography of Iapetus’ leading side Bernd Giese a,∗, Tilmann Denk b, Gerhard Neukum b, Thomas Roatsch a, Paul Helfenstein c, Peter C. Thomas c, Elizabeth P. Turtle d, Alfred McEwen e, Carolyn C. Porco f a DLR, Institute of Planetary Research, Rutherfordstr. 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany b Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, 12249 Berlin, Germany c Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA d Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd., Laurel, MD 20723, USA e Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1541 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA f Cassini Imaging Central Laboratory for Operations, Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder, CO 80301, USA Received 12 December 2006; revised 15 May 2007 Available online 18 July 2007 Abstract We have used Cassini stereo images to study the topography of Iapetus’ leading side. A terrain model derived at resolutions of 4–8 km reveals that Iapetus has substantial topography with heights in the range of −10 km to +13 km, much more than observed on the other middle-sized satellites of Saturn so far. Most of the topography is older than 4 Ga [Neukum, G., Wagner, R., Denk, T., Porco, C.C., 2005. Lunar Planet. Sci. XXXVI. Abstract 2034] which implies that Iapetus must have had a thick lithosphere early in its history to support this topography. Models of lithospheric deflection by topographic loads provide an estimate of the required elastic thickness in the range of 50–100 km. -
The First Six Months of Iapetus Observations by the Cassini Iss Camera
Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVI (2005) 2262.pdf THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF IAPETUS OBSERVATIONS BY THE CASSINI ISS CAMERA. T. Denk1, G. Neukum1, P. Helfenstein2, P.C. Thomas2, E.P. Turtle3, A.S. McEwen3, T. Roatsch4, J. Veverka2, T.V. Johnson5, J.E. Perry3, W.M. Owen5, R.J. Wagner4, C.C. Porco6, and the Cassini ISS Team. 1Freie Universität Berlin, Malteserstr. 74-100 Haus D, 12249 Berlin, Germany ([email protected]), 2Cornell University, Ithaca NY, 3University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, 4DLR (German Aerospace Center) Berlin, 5JPL, Pasadena CA, 6Space Science Institute, Boulder CO. Abstract/ Introduction. Since Saturn arrival in June equator in the dark terrain, others appeared to be correlated 2004, Iapetus has been studied intensively by the Cassini to the huge basin. ISS camera [1] at various ranges. The first of two relatively Cassini July 2004 data (post-conjunction). Cassini close flybys in the primary mission occured on Dec 31, observed high southern latitudes and the south pole for the 2004 at an altitude of ~123,400 km over the northern lead- first time; best image resolution was 15 km/pxl. These data ing hemisphere, resulting in images with a minimum pixel revealed a second large impact structure (at ~15°S/120°W, scale of 740 m. Detailed results of this flyby are given in diameter is ~390 km), also with a polygonal shape, which [2], while this abstract covers the observations obtained is more difficult to discern [3, 9]. Dark crater rims facing earlier. Among the most important discoveries are: (a) Four towards Iapetus' apex of motion were clearly identified [3]. -
Pluto's Far Side
Pluto’s Far Side S.A. Stern Southwest Research Institute O.L. White SETI Institute P.J. McGovern Lunar and Planetary Institute J.T. Keane California Institute of Technology J.W. Conrad, C.J. Bierson University of California, Santa Cruz C.B. Olkin Southwest Research Institute P.M. Schenk Lunar and Planetary Institute J.M. Moore NASA Ames Research Center K.D. Runyon Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory and The New Horizons Team 1 Abstract The New Horizons spacecraft provided near-global observations of Pluto that far exceed the resolution of Earth-based datasets. Most Pluto New Horizons analysis hitherto has focused on Pluto’s encounter hemisphere (i.e., the anti-Charon hemisphere containing Sputnik Planitia). In this work, we summarize and interpret data on Pluto’s “far side” (i.e., the non-encounter hemisphere), providing the first integrated New Horizons overview of Pluto’s far side terrains. We find strong evidence for widespread bladed deposits, evidence for an impact crater about as large as any on the “near side” hemisphere, evidence for complex lineations approximately antipodal to Sputnik Planitia that may be causally related, and evidence that the far side maculae are smaller and more structured than Pluto’s encounter hemisphere maculae. 2 Introduction Before the 2015 exploration of Pluto by New Horizons (e.g., Stern et al. 2015, 2018 and references therein) none of Pluto’s surface features were known except by crude (though heroically derived) albedo maps, with resolutions of 300-500 km obtainable from the Hubble Space Telescope (e.g., Buie et al. 1992, 1997, 2010) and Pluto-Charon mutual event techniques (e.g., Young & Binzel 1993, Young et al. -
Accretion of Saturn's Mid-Sized Moons During the Viscous
Accretion of Saturn’s mid-sized moons during the viscous spreading of young massive rings: solving the paradox of silicate-poor rings versus silicate-rich moons. Sébastien CHARNOZ *,1 Aurélien CRIDA 2 Julie C. CASTILLO-ROGEZ 3 Valery LAINEY 4 Luke DONES 5 Özgür KARATEKIN 6 Gabriel TOBIE 7 Stephane MATHIS 1 Christophe LE PONCIN-LAFITTE 8 Julien SALMON 5,1 (1) Laboratoire AIM, UMR 7158, Université Paris Diderot /CEA IRFU /CNRS, Centre de l’Orme les Merisiers, 91191, Gif sur Yvette Cedex France (2) Université de Nice Sophia-antipolis / C.N.R.S. / Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur Laboratoire Cassiopée UMR6202, BP4229, 06304 NICE cedex 4, France (3) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, M/S 79-24, 4800 Oak Drive Pasadena, CA 91109 USA (4) IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8028 CNRS / UPMC, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France (5) Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA (6) Royal Observatory of Belgium, Avenue Circulaire 3, 1180 Uccle, Bruxelles, Belgium (7) Université de Nantes, UFR des Sciences et des Techniques, Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, 2 rue de la Houssinière, B.P. 92208, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France (8) SyRTE, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8630 du CNRS, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France (*) To whom correspondence should be addressed ([email protected]) 1 ABSTRACT The origin of Saturn’s inner mid-sized moons (Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione and Rhea) and Saturn’s rings is debated. Charnoz et al. (2010) introduced the idea that the smallest inner moons could form from the spreading of the rings’ edge while Salmon et al. -
Scientific Goals for Exploration of the Outer Solar System
Scientific Goals for Exploration of the Outer Solar System Explore Outer Planet Systems and Ocean Worlds OPAG Report v. 28 August 2019 This is a living document and new revisions will be posted with the appropriate date stamp. Outline August 2019 Letter of Response to Dr. Glaze Request for Pre Decadal Big Questions............i, ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 The Outer Solar System in Vision and Voyages ................................................................ 5 1.2 New Emphasis since the Decadal Survey: Exploring Ocean Worlds .................................. 8 2.0 GIANT PLANETS ............................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Jupiter and Saturn ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Uranus and Neptune ……………………………………………………………………… 15 3.0 GIANT PLANET MAGNETOSPHERES ........................................................................... 18 4.0 GIANT PLANET RING SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 22 5.0 GIANT PLANETS’ MOONS ............................................................................................. 25 5.1 Pristine/Primitive (Less Evolved?) Satellites’ Objectives ............................................... -
EPSC-DPS2011-1527-1, 2011 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011 C Author(S) 2011
EPSC Abstracts Vol. 6, EPSC-DPS2011-1527-1, 2011 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011 c Author(s) 2011 Building the Ridge of Iapetus: Modeling an In-Falling Ring K. J. Walsh (1), H. F. Levison (1), D. C. Richardson (2), S. R. Schwartz (2,3) (1) Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA, (2) University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, (3) University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Nice, France ([email protected]) Abstract (Fig 6d or image N1476575655). Given the current observations, with confirmed ex- The ridge on Iapetus is a puzzling feature – up to istence of the ridge spanning the entire well-observed 15 km tall and 100’s of km wide; it is challenging leading-side hemisphere [4, 5], the leading-side limb to reconcile with the global history of Iapetus. The [3] and also the trailing-side [5] it is safe to assume most commonly proposed exogenic cause of this fea- that this feature is indeed global. Overall, to summa- ture is the build up of in-falling material from a ring, rize the observations and construct a list of target con- or disk, of orbiting material [1, 2]. However no de- straints for this modeling effort we find, tailed modeling exists for which a comparison can be made against the known features of the Iapetan 1. The ridge is global. It appears to encircle almost ridge. The constraining features of the Iapetan ridge the entire world, though there are significant re- are: general dimensions, morphology/slopes, possibil- gions where it has seemingly been removed or did ity for incomplete coverage and some localised cases not exist. -
Mission Science Highlights and Science Objectives Assessment
CASSINI FINAL MISSION REPORT 2019 1 MISSION SCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS AND SCIENCE OBJECTIVES ASSESSMENT Cassini-Huygens, humanity’s most distant planetary orbiter and probe to date, provided the first in- depth, close up study of Saturn, its magnificent rings and unique moons, including Titan and Enceladus, and its giant magnetosphere. Discoveries from the Cassini-Huygens mission revolutionized our understanding of the Saturn system and fundamentally altered many of our concepts of where life might be found in our solar system and beyond. Cassini-Huygens arrived at Saturn in 2004, dropped the parachuted probe named Huygens to study the atmosphere and surface of Saturn’s planet-sized moon Titan, and orbited Saturn for the next 13 years making remarkable discoveries. When it was running low on fuel, the Cassini orbiter was programmed to vaporize in Saturn’s atmosphere in 2017 to protect the ocean worlds, Enceladus and Titan, where it discovered potential habitats for life. CASSINI FINAL MISSION REPORT 2019 2 CONTENTS MISSION SCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS AND SCIENCE OBJECTIVES ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 1 Executive Summary................................................................................................................................................ 5 Origin of the Cassini Mission ....................................................................................................................... 5 Instrument Teams and Interdisciplinary Investigations ............................................................................... -
Ocean Worlds in the Outer Solar System F
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. ???, XXXX, DOI:10.1029/, Ocean Worlds in the Outer Solar System F. Nimmo1 and R.T. Pappalardo2 Abstract. Many outer solar system bodies are thought to harbor liquid water oceans beneath their ice shells. This article first reviews how such oceans are detected. We then discuss how they are maintained, when they formed, and what the oceans’ likely char- acteristics are. We focus in particular on Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Titan and Ence- ladus, bodies for which there is direct evidence of subsurface oceans. We also consider candidate ocean worlds such as Pluto and Triton. 1. Introduction consequences of these oceans; and the extent to which they might be habitable. We begin with a general discussion of The outer solar system contains a stunningly diverse ar- each of these topics, and then discuss applications to differ- ray of planetary bodies (Figs 1,2): Europa, with its bizarre ent ocean worlds. We focus in particular on the five bodies array of surface features; tiny, geologically-active Enceladus; for which oceans are currently best established - Europa, Titan, the only moon with a substantial atmosphere; Pluto, Ganymede, Callisto, Enceladus and Titan - but where ap- with its nitrogen glaciers; and many others. Over the last propriate we mention other potential ocean worlds, includ- twenty-five years spacecraft measurements have revealed ing Triton and Pluto. that many of these bodies are “ocean worlds”, possessing large volumes of liquid water beneath insulating ice shells. In this article we will review the exploration history of these 2. History of Exploration and Ideas ocean worlds, what we currently know about them, and what revelations the next twenty-five years may bring. -
Debess Debess Pavasaris
Indekss 2214 ZVAIGÞÒOTÂ ZVAIGÞÒOTÂ 2009 DEBESS DEBESS PAVASARIS STARPTAUTISKAIS ASTRONOMIJAS GADS 2009 ATKLÂTS PARÎZÇ Orbita Sciences Corporation projektçtais kosmosa kuìis Cygnus sâkotnçji tiktu izmantots kravu pârvadâðanai, vçlâk arî pilotçjamiem lidojumiem. Attçls: OSC GALAKTIKU SADURSMES – IZPLATÎTA PARÂDÎBA – VELKAS SIMTIEM MILJONU GADU Ðâdi varçtu izskatîties SpaceX kosmosa kuìa Dragon pilotçjamâs versijas iekðçjais pilotu un sistçmu izvietojums. Attçls: SpaceX ASTRONOMIJA ATGRIEÞAS SKOLÂ Kas IR “LIEKÂ SEKUNDE”? Kâ IEGUVA ÛDENI KOSMISKAJÂ STACIJÂ «MIR»? Sk. M. Sudâra rakstu “Space Shuttle pensijâ, iespçjams, nâkoðgad vçl neies”. TOP A S V PRIVÂTU KOMPÂNIJU KOSMOSA KUÌI Cena Ls 1,85 PIRMIE Z M P PASTMARKÂS 01.08.2008. plkst. 12:54 GMT: pçdçjie Saules stari (attçlâ pa kreisi) pirms pilnâs fâzes. Pilnâ fâze plkst. 12:55 GMT (pa labi). Saules labajâ augðçjâ malâ labi redzama protuberance. Diska apakðçjâ kreisajâ malâ iespçjams novçrot Mçness reljefu. Vainagâ labi redzamas magnçtiskâ lauka lînijas, kas veido izteiktus starus polos (pa diagonâli no kreisâs apakðçjâs malas uz labo augðçjo malu). Fotokamera: Sony Alpha 700, jutîba: ISO 200, objektîvs: Sony SAL–500F80, reflektora tipa konstrukcija, diafragma: f/8. Ekspozîcijas laiks: 1/640 s. Novçroðanas vieta 49°58’05.28" N, 85°57’37.97" E. Fotografçjis autors Sk. G. Ðíilas rakstu “Par Saules aptumsumu Sibîrijâ jeb Altaja odiseja 2008". Laiks abonçt þurnâlu 6. att. Mijiedarbîgas galaktikas. Saplûstoðu galaktiku attçli no 59 attçlu lielas kolekcijas, kas iegûta ar Habla kosmisko teleskopu un publicçta ðî teleskopa 18. gadadienâ 2008. gada 24. aprîlî. NASA/ESA/STScI/AURA (The Hubble Heritage Team) – ESA/Hubble Collaboration/University of Virginia, Charlottesville, NRAO, Stony Brook University (A. Evans) Sk. Z. Alksnes, A. -
Cassini Mission Science Report – ISS
Volume 1: Cassini Mission Science Report – ISS Carolyn Porco, Robert West, John Barbara, Nicolas Cooper, Anthony Del Genio, Tilmann Denk, Luke Dones, Michael Evans, Matthew Hedman, Paul Helfenstein, Andrew Ingersoll, Robert Jacobson, Alfred McEwen, Carl Murray, Jason Perry, Thomas Roatsch, Peter Thomas, Matthew Tiscareno, Elizabeth Turtle Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 1 ISS Instrument Summary …………………………………………………………………………… 2 2 Key Objectives for ISS Instrument ……………………………………………………………… 4 3 ISS Science Assessment …………………………………………………………………………….. 6 4 ISS Saturn System Science Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 4.1 Titan ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 9 4.2 Enceladus ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 4 3 Main Icy Satellites ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16 4.4 Satellite Orbits & Orbital Evolution…………………………………………………….……………………. 21 4.5 Small Satellites ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 4.6 Phoebe and the Irregular Satellites ………………………………………………………………………… 23 4.7 Saturn ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 25 4.8 Rings ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 4.9 Open Questions for Saturn System Science ……………………………………………………………… 33 5 ISS Non-Saturn Science Results …………………………………………………………………. 41 5.1 Jupiter Atmosphere and Rings………………………………………………………………………………… 41 5.2 Jupiter/Exoplanet Studies ………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 5.3 Jupiter Satellites………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 5.4 Open Questions for Non-Saturn Science …………………………………………………………………. -
Iapetus' Geophysics: Rotation Rate, Shape, and Equatorial Ridge
Icarus 190 (2007) 179–202 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Iapetus’ geophysics: Rotation rate, shape, and equatorial ridge J.C. Castillo-Rogez a,∗,D.L.Matsona,C.Sotina,b, T.V. Johnson a, J.I. Lunine c, P.C. Thomas d a Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, M/S 230-260, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA b UMR – CNRS 6112 Laboratoire de planétologie et géodynamique de Nantes, 2, rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France c Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA d Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, 422 Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Received 23 July 2006; revised 30 January 2007 Available online 28 March 2007 Abstract Iapetus has preserved evidence that constrains the modeling of its geophysical history from the time of its accretion until now. The evidence is (a) its present 79.33-day rotation or spin rate, (b) its shape that corresponds to the equilibrium figure for a hydrostatic body rotating with a period of ∼16 h, and (c) its high, equatorial ridge, which is unique in the Solar System. This paper reports the results of an investigation into the coupling between Iapetus’ thermal and orbital evolution for a wide range of conditions including the spatial distributions with time of composition, porosity, short-lived radioactive isotopes (SLRI), and temperature. The thermal model uses conductive heat transfer with temperature-dependent conductivity. Only models with a thick lithosphere and an interior viscosity in the range of about the water ice melting point can explain the observed shape. -
Exploration of Enceladus and Titan
Exploration of Enceladus and Titan 1 Exploration of Enceladus and Titan Authors Mitri, Giuseppe IRSPS InGeo Univ. d’Annunzio Italy [email protected] Barnes Jason Univ. of Idaho U.S.A. [email protected] Coustenis Athena LESIA, Observatoire de Paris France [email protected] Flamini Enrico IRSPS, Università d’Annunzio Italy [email protected] Hayes Alexander Cornell University U.S.A. [email protected] Lorenz Ralph D. JHU Applied Physics Lab. U.S.A. [email protected] Mastrogiuseppe Marco Università La Sapienza Italy [email protected] Orosei Roberto INAF Italy [email protected] Postberg Frank University of Heidelberg Germany [email protected] Reh Kim Jet Propulsion Laboratory U.S.A. [email protected] Soderblom Jason M. MIT U.S.A. [email protected] Sotin Christophe Jet Propulsion Laboratory U.S.A. [email protected] Tobie Gabriel Université de Nantes France [email protected] Tortora Paolo University of Bologna Italy [email protected] Vuitton Veronique Univ. Grenoble Alpes France [email protected] Wurz Peter University of Bern Switzerland [email protected] 2 Exploration of Enceladus and Titan Executive Summary Recent observations from the ground and in space have shown that Earth is not the only place in the Solar System to possess exposed surface liquid. Observations have provided evidence of subsurface liquid water oceans covered by icy shells on multiple objects in the Solar System, called ocean worlds, including the icy moons of Jupiter (Europa, Ganymede and Callisto) and of Saturn (Titan and Enceladus) and dwarf planets (Ceres and Pluto) (see Lunine 2017 for a review).