The First Six Months of Iapetus Observations by the Cassini Iss Camera
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Topography of Iapetus' Leading Side
Icarus 193 (2008) 359–371 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus The topography of Iapetus’ leading side Bernd Giese a,∗, Tilmann Denk b, Gerhard Neukum b, Thomas Roatsch a, Paul Helfenstein c, Peter C. Thomas c, Elizabeth P. Turtle d, Alfred McEwen e, Carolyn C. Porco f a DLR, Institute of Planetary Research, Rutherfordstr. 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany b Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, 12249 Berlin, Germany c Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA d Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd., Laurel, MD 20723, USA e Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1541 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA f Cassini Imaging Central Laboratory for Operations, Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder, CO 80301, USA Received 12 December 2006; revised 15 May 2007 Available online 18 July 2007 Abstract We have used Cassini stereo images to study the topography of Iapetus’ leading side. A terrain model derived at resolutions of 4–8 km reveals that Iapetus has substantial topography with heights in the range of −10 km to +13 km, much more than observed on the other middle-sized satellites of Saturn so far. Most of the topography is older than 4 Ga [Neukum, G., Wagner, R., Denk, T., Porco, C.C., 2005. Lunar Planet. Sci. XXXVI. Abstract 2034] which implies that Iapetus must have had a thick lithosphere early in its history to support this topography. Models of lithospheric deflection by topographic loads provide an estimate of the required elastic thickness in the range of 50–100 km. -
Accretion of Saturn's Mid-Sized Moons During the Viscous
Accretion of Saturn’s mid-sized moons during the viscous spreading of young massive rings: solving the paradox of silicate-poor rings versus silicate-rich moons. Sébastien CHARNOZ *,1 Aurélien CRIDA 2 Julie C. CASTILLO-ROGEZ 3 Valery LAINEY 4 Luke DONES 5 Özgür KARATEKIN 6 Gabriel TOBIE 7 Stephane MATHIS 1 Christophe LE PONCIN-LAFITTE 8 Julien SALMON 5,1 (1) Laboratoire AIM, UMR 7158, Université Paris Diderot /CEA IRFU /CNRS, Centre de l’Orme les Merisiers, 91191, Gif sur Yvette Cedex France (2) Université de Nice Sophia-antipolis / C.N.R.S. / Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur Laboratoire Cassiopée UMR6202, BP4229, 06304 NICE cedex 4, France (3) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, M/S 79-24, 4800 Oak Drive Pasadena, CA 91109 USA (4) IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8028 CNRS / UPMC, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France (5) Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA (6) Royal Observatory of Belgium, Avenue Circulaire 3, 1180 Uccle, Bruxelles, Belgium (7) Université de Nantes, UFR des Sciences et des Techniques, Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, 2 rue de la Houssinière, B.P. 92208, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France (8) SyRTE, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8630 du CNRS, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France (*) To whom correspondence should be addressed ([email protected]) 1 ABSTRACT The origin of Saturn’s inner mid-sized moons (Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione and Rhea) and Saturn’s rings is debated. Charnoz et al. (2010) introduced the idea that the smallest inner moons could form from the spreading of the rings’ edge while Salmon et al. -
Scientific Goals for Exploration of the Outer Solar System
Scientific Goals for Exploration of the Outer Solar System Explore Outer Planet Systems and Ocean Worlds OPAG Report v. 28 August 2019 This is a living document and new revisions will be posted with the appropriate date stamp. Outline August 2019 Letter of Response to Dr. Glaze Request for Pre Decadal Big Questions............i, ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 The Outer Solar System in Vision and Voyages ................................................................ 5 1.2 New Emphasis since the Decadal Survey: Exploring Ocean Worlds .................................. 8 2.0 GIANT PLANETS ............................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Jupiter and Saturn ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Uranus and Neptune ……………………………………………………………………… 15 3.0 GIANT PLANET MAGNETOSPHERES ........................................................................... 18 4.0 GIANT PLANET RING SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 22 5.0 GIANT PLANETS’ MOONS ............................................................................................. 25 5.1 Pristine/Primitive (Less Evolved?) Satellites’ Objectives ............................................... -
Scientific Goals for Exploration of the Outer Solar System
Scientific Goals for Exploration of the Outer Solar System Explore Ocean Worlds OPAG Report DRAFT 11 November 2015 Outline Executive Summary Introduction: Explore Ocean Worlds, Small and Large Giant Planets Jupiter and Saturn Uranus and Neptune Giant Planet Magnetospheres Rings Moons Pristine to Primitive Satellites Ganymede Triton Io Enceladus Titan Europa 2 Executive Summary The purpose of this document is to frame the science objectives for exploration of the outer solar system. It is consistent with the 2013 Decadal Survey “Visions and Voyages” but will be kept up-to-date as new discoveries are made, models evolve, our understanding of solar system processes changes, and new questions are posed. This document will be used as a resource for defining technology development directions and needed laboratory experiments. This document may be used as a resource for mission and instrument science objectives. Ultimately this document will guide our preparation for the outer solar system portion of the next decadal survey. The most important science objectives for each destination are identified, with the understanding that the over-arching theme will define the key questions to be addressed from the collection of intriguing topics. The over-arching theme will guide the prioritization that will be required, to recommend the next Decadal mission set. What does the outer solar system provide, that uniquely addresses NASA’s top-level strategic goal to ascertain the content, origin, and evolution of the solar system and potential for life (2011 NASA Strategic Plan). How did the outer planets mold the solar system and create habitable worlds? The emerging science theme for future exploration of the outer solar system is to understand ice giants and ocean worlds. -
EPSC-DPS2011-1527-1, 2011 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011 C Author(S) 2011
EPSC Abstracts Vol. 6, EPSC-DPS2011-1527-1, 2011 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011 c Author(s) 2011 Building the Ridge of Iapetus: Modeling an In-Falling Ring K. J. Walsh (1), H. F. Levison (1), D. C. Richardson (2), S. R. Schwartz (2,3) (1) Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA, (2) University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, (3) University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Nice, France ([email protected]) Abstract (Fig 6d or image N1476575655). Given the current observations, with confirmed ex- The ridge on Iapetus is a puzzling feature – up to istence of the ridge spanning the entire well-observed 15 km tall and 100’s of km wide; it is challenging leading-side hemisphere [4, 5], the leading-side limb to reconcile with the global history of Iapetus. The [3] and also the trailing-side [5] it is safe to assume most commonly proposed exogenic cause of this fea- that this feature is indeed global. Overall, to summa- ture is the build up of in-falling material from a ring, rize the observations and construct a list of target con- or disk, of orbiting material [1, 2]. However no de- straints for this modeling effort we find, tailed modeling exists for which a comparison can be made against the known features of the Iapetan 1. The ridge is global. It appears to encircle almost ridge. The constraining features of the Iapetan ridge the entire world, though there are significant re- are: general dimensions, morphology/slopes, possibil- gions where it has seemingly been removed or did ity for incomplete coverage and some localised cases not exist. -
Mission Science Highlights and Science Objectives Assessment
CASSINI FINAL MISSION REPORT 2019 1 MISSION SCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS AND SCIENCE OBJECTIVES ASSESSMENT Cassini-Huygens, humanity’s most distant planetary orbiter and probe to date, provided the first in- depth, close up study of Saturn, its magnificent rings and unique moons, including Titan and Enceladus, and its giant magnetosphere. Discoveries from the Cassini-Huygens mission revolutionized our understanding of the Saturn system and fundamentally altered many of our concepts of where life might be found in our solar system and beyond. Cassini-Huygens arrived at Saturn in 2004, dropped the parachuted probe named Huygens to study the atmosphere and surface of Saturn’s planet-sized moon Titan, and orbited Saturn for the next 13 years making remarkable discoveries. When it was running low on fuel, the Cassini orbiter was programmed to vaporize in Saturn’s atmosphere in 2017 to protect the ocean worlds, Enceladus and Titan, where it discovered potential habitats for life. CASSINI FINAL MISSION REPORT 2019 2 CONTENTS MISSION SCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS AND SCIENCE OBJECTIVES ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 1 Executive Summary................................................................................................................................................ 5 Origin of the Cassini Mission ....................................................................................................................... 5 Instrument Teams and Interdisciplinary Investigations ............................................................................... -
Debess Debess Pavasaris
Indekss 2214 ZVAIGÞÒOTÂ ZVAIGÞÒOTÂ 2009 DEBESS DEBESS PAVASARIS STARPTAUTISKAIS ASTRONOMIJAS GADS 2009 ATKLÂTS PARÎZÇ Orbita Sciences Corporation projektçtais kosmosa kuìis Cygnus sâkotnçji tiktu izmantots kravu pârvadâðanai, vçlâk arî pilotçjamiem lidojumiem. Attçls: OSC GALAKTIKU SADURSMES – IZPLATÎTA PARÂDÎBA – VELKAS SIMTIEM MILJONU GADU Ðâdi varçtu izskatîties SpaceX kosmosa kuìa Dragon pilotçjamâs versijas iekðçjais pilotu un sistçmu izvietojums. Attçls: SpaceX ASTRONOMIJA ATGRIEÞAS SKOLÂ Kas IR “LIEKÂ SEKUNDE”? Kâ IEGUVA ÛDENI KOSMISKAJÂ STACIJÂ «MIR»? Sk. M. Sudâra rakstu “Space Shuttle pensijâ, iespçjams, nâkoðgad vçl neies”. TOP A S V PRIVÂTU KOMPÂNIJU KOSMOSA KUÌI Cena Ls 1,85 PIRMIE Z M P PASTMARKÂS 01.08.2008. plkst. 12:54 GMT: pçdçjie Saules stari (attçlâ pa kreisi) pirms pilnâs fâzes. Pilnâ fâze plkst. 12:55 GMT (pa labi). Saules labajâ augðçjâ malâ labi redzama protuberance. Diska apakðçjâ kreisajâ malâ iespçjams novçrot Mçness reljefu. Vainagâ labi redzamas magnçtiskâ lauka lînijas, kas veido izteiktus starus polos (pa diagonâli no kreisâs apakðçjâs malas uz labo augðçjo malu). Fotokamera: Sony Alpha 700, jutîba: ISO 200, objektîvs: Sony SAL–500F80, reflektora tipa konstrukcija, diafragma: f/8. Ekspozîcijas laiks: 1/640 s. Novçroðanas vieta 49°58’05.28" N, 85°57’37.97" E. Fotografçjis autors Sk. G. Ðíilas rakstu “Par Saules aptumsumu Sibîrijâ jeb Altaja odiseja 2008". Laiks abonçt þurnâlu 6. att. Mijiedarbîgas galaktikas. Saplûstoðu galaktiku attçli no 59 attçlu lielas kolekcijas, kas iegûta ar Habla kosmisko teleskopu un publicçta ðî teleskopa 18. gadadienâ 2008. gada 24. aprîlî. NASA/ESA/STScI/AURA (The Hubble Heritage Team) – ESA/Hubble Collaboration/University of Virginia, Charlottesville, NRAO, Stony Brook University (A. Evans) Sk. Z. Alksnes, A. -
Cassini Mission Science Report – ISS
Volume 1: Cassini Mission Science Report – ISS Carolyn Porco, Robert West, John Barbara, Nicolas Cooper, Anthony Del Genio, Tilmann Denk, Luke Dones, Michael Evans, Matthew Hedman, Paul Helfenstein, Andrew Ingersoll, Robert Jacobson, Alfred McEwen, Carl Murray, Jason Perry, Thomas Roatsch, Peter Thomas, Matthew Tiscareno, Elizabeth Turtle Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 1 ISS Instrument Summary …………………………………………………………………………… 2 2 Key Objectives for ISS Instrument ……………………………………………………………… 4 3 ISS Science Assessment …………………………………………………………………………….. 6 4 ISS Saturn System Science Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 4.1 Titan ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 9 4.2 Enceladus ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 4 3 Main Icy Satellites ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16 4.4 Satellite Orbits & Orbital Evolution…………………………………………………….……………………. 21 4.5 Small Satellites ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 4.6 Phoebe and the Irregular Satellites ………………………………………………………………………… 23 4.7 Saturn ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 25 4.8 Rings ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 4.9 Open Questions for Saturn System Science ……………………………………………………………… 33 5 ISS Non-Saturn Science Results …………………………………………………………………. 41 5.1 Jupiter Atmosphere and Rings………………………………………………………………………………… 41 5.2 Jupiter/Exoplanet Studies ………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 5.3 Jupiter Satellites………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 5.4 Open Questions for Non-Saturn Science …………………………………………………………………. -
Iapetus' Geophysics: Rotation Rate, Shape, and Equatorial Ridge
Icarus 190 (2007) 179–202 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Iapetus’ geophysics: Rotation rate, shape, and equatorial ridge J.C. Castillo-Rogez a,∗,D.L.Matsona,C.Sotina,b, T.V. Johnson a, J.I. Lunine c, P.C. Thomas d a Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, M/S 230-260, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA b UMR – CNRS 6112 Laboratoire de planétologie et géodynamique de Nantes, 2, rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France c Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA d Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, 422 Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Received 23 July 2006; revised 30 January 2007 Available online 28 March 2007 Abstract Iapetus has preserved evidence that constrains the modeling of its geophysical history from the time of its accretion until now. The evidence is (a) its present 79.33-day rotation or spin rate, (b) its shape that corresponds to the equilibrium figure for a hydrostatic body rotating with a period of ∼16 h, and (c) its high, equatorial ridge, which is unique in the Solar System. This paper reports the results of an investigation into the coupling between Iapetus’ thermal and orbital evolution for a wide range of conditions including the spatial distributions with time of composition, porosity, short-lived radioactive isotopes (SLRI), and temperature. The thermal model uses conductive heat transfer with temperature-dependent conductivity. Only models with a thick lithosphere and an interior viscosity in the range of about the water ice melting point can explain the observed shape. -
The Irregular Satellites of Saturn
Denk T., Mottola S., Tosi F., Bottke W. F., and Hamilton D. P. (2018) The irregular satellites of Saturn. In Enceladus and the Icy Moons of Saturn (P. M. Schenk et al., eds.), pp. 409–434. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, DOI: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816537075-ch020. The Irregular Satellites of Saturn Tilmann Denk Freie Universität Berlin Stefano Mottola Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Federico Tosi Istituto di Astrofsica e Planetologia Spaziali William F. Bottke Southwest Research Institute Douglas P. Hamilton University of Maryland, College Park With 38 known members, the outer or irregular moons constitute the largest group of sat- ellites in the saturnian system. All but exceptionally big Phoebe were discovered between the years 2000 and 2007. Observations from the ground and from near-Earth space constrained the orbits and revealed their approximate sizes (~4 to ~40 km), low visible albedos (likely below ~0.1), and large variety of colors (slightly bluish to medium-reddish). These fndings suggest the existence of satellite dynamical families, indicative of collisional evolution and common progenitors. Observations with the Cassini spacecraft allowed lightcurves to be obtained that helped determine rotational periods, coarse shape models, pole-axis orientations, possible global color variations over their surfaces, and other basic properties of the irregulars. Among the 25 measured moons, the fastest period is 5.45 h. This is much slower than the disruption rotation barrier of asteroids, indicating that the outer moons may have rather low densities, possibly as low as comets. Likely non-random correlations were found between the ranges to Saturn, orbit directions, object sizes, and rotation periods. -
Remarks on the Iapetus' Bulge and Ridge
LETTER Earth Planets Space, 65, 929–934, 2013 Remarks on the Iapetus’ bulge and ridge Leszek Czechowski and Jacek Leliwa-Kopystynski Institute of Geophysics, Department of Physics, University of Warsaw, Ul. Pasteura 7, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland (Received April 4, 2008; Revised May 26, 2012; Accepted December 18, 2012; Online published September 17, 2013) Iapetus is a medium sized icy satellite of Saturn. It has two spectacular features: the equatorial ridge (ER) and the abnormally large flattening. The flattening is usually explained in terms of large non-hydrostatic fossil equatorial bulge (EB) supported by a thick lithosphere. Here we show, building on the principle of isostasy, that EB and ER could be a result of low density roots underlying the lithosphere below the equator. The low density matter formed the layer over the core of the satellite. Such situation was unstable. The instability led to origin of axially symmetric plumes that formed equatorial bulge and equatorial ridge. So, we explain both: EB and ER in the frame of one hypothesis. Key words: Iapetus; satellite, shape; satellites, surface; tectonics. 1. Introduction vanced model of Robuchon et al. (2010) further reduces the Iapetus is a medium-sized icy satellite (MIS) of Saturn range of possible time of accretion and indicates that special with two spectacular features: the geologically old equa- Burgess rheology is necessary. torial ridge (ER) rising above the equatorial bulge (EB)— Other explanations of the origin of ER are also proposed: Fig. 1. The topographic map of elevation of Iapetus con- 1. Exogenic origin. ER is the build up of in-falling ma- firms that ER is rising above EB—see e.g. -
Evolution of Icy Satellites
Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-010-9635-1 Evolution of Icy Satellites G. Schubert · H. Hussmann · V. L a i n e y · D.L. Matson · W.B. McKinnon · F. Sohl · C. Sotin · G. Tobie · D. Turrini · T. Van Hoolst Received: 10 July 2009 / Accepted: 8 February 2010 © The Author(s) 2010 Abstract Evolutionary scenarios for the major satellites of Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, and Pluto-Charon are discussed. In the Jovian system the challenge is to understand how the G. Schubert () Department of Earth and Space Sciences and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA e-mail: [email protected] H. Hussmann · F. Sohl German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Planetary Research, 12489 Berlin, Germany H. Hussmann e-mail: [email protected] F. Sohl e-mail: [email protected] V. Lainey IMCCE-Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8028 du CNRS, 77 Avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] D.L. Matson JPL 183-335, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA e-mail: [email protected] W.B. McKinnon Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA e-mail: [email protected] C. Sotin JPL/Caltech, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA e-mail: [email protected] G. Tobie University of Nante, Nantes, France e-mail: [email protected] G. Schubert et al. present Laplace resonance of Io, Europa, and Ganymede was established and to determine whether the heat being radiated by Io is in balance with the present tidal dissipation in the moon.