DOCSLIB.ORG

This Email Has Been Scanned by the Symantec Email Security.Cloud Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

From: Victoria Lane (Brodies Solicitors) To: Hornsea Project Three Cc: Karen Hamilton (Brodies Solicitors) Subject: Spirit Energy ISH 1 Submission - Appendix A, C, D, G - I, K [BRO-D.FID4510105] Date: 14 December 2018 23:41:19 Attachments: image002.png image004.png image006.png image008.png image010.png image012.png SE ISH 1 - Appendix H - MCA, Methodology for Assessing the Marine Navigational Safety & Emergency Response Risks of Offshore Renewable Energy Installations 2013_44074596_1.PDF SE ISH 1 - Appendix K - Transport Committee Seocnd Report on Helicopter Safety (July 2014)_44074367_1.PDF SE ISH 1 - Appendix I - CAA CAP 1145 Offshore helicopter review and annexes 24214 - February 2014_44074250_1.PDF SE ISH 1 - Appendix G - Map of the UK_Exclusive_Economic_Zone_44074304_1.PDF SE ISH 1 - Appendix D - Advice-note-9.-Rochdale-envelope-web - Feb 2009_44074237_1.PDF SE ISH 1 - Appendix C - MCA MGN_372 (August 2008)_44074569_1.PDF SE ISH 1 - Appendix A - 19830815 Licence P.468 (Block 49-4a) dated 15 August 1983_44079455_1.PDF CONFIDENTIAL MESSAGE - INTENDED RECIPIENT ONLY Please find attached Appendix A, C, D, G – I, K Kind regards Victoria Lane Senior Solicitor Edinburgh, UK www.brodies.com Direct Line +44(0) 131 656 0127 ************************************************************************************************************ IMPORTANT NOTICE: This notice applies to this email and to any other email subsequently sent by anyone at Brodies LLP and appearing in the same chain of email correspondence. References below to "this email" should be read accordingly. This e-mail and its attachments (if any) are confidential, protected by copyright and may be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, notify us immediately by reply e-mail, delete it and do not use, disclose or copy it. Unless we expressly say otherwise in this e-mail, this e-mail does not create, form part of, or vary, any contractual or unilateral obligation. No liability is accepted for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Where this e-mail is unrelated to the business of Brodies LLP, the opinions expressed within this e-mail are the opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those of Brodies LLP. Brodies LLP is a limited liability partnership and responsibility for e-mails related to its business lies with Brodies LLP and not the individual sender. The e-mail system of Brodies LLP is subject to random monitoring. A list of all the members is maintained and may be inspected during office hours at Brodies LLP's registered office. Privacy: The e-mail system of Brodies LLP is subject to random monitoring. To find out more about how we use your personal information generally, please read our privacy statement. http://www.brodies.com/privacy-notice Brodies LLP (registered no SO300334), Registered Office: 15 Atholl Crescent, Edinburgh, EH3 8HA, Scotland UK. T 0131 228 3777, F 0131 228 3878, DX Ed10 Edinburgh-1 Also at: 110 Queen Street, Glasgow G1 3BX, Scotland UK T 0141 248 4672, F 0141 221 9270, DX GW11 Glasgow-1; And: Brodies House, 31-33 Union Grove, Aberdeen AB10 6SD, Scotland UK T 01224 392 242, F 01224 392 244, DX AB10 Aberdeen; And: Dingwall Business Park, Dingwall, IV15 9XB, Scotland UK T 01349 860 111, F 01349 860 112; And: Scotland House, Rond-Point Schuman 6, 1040 Brussels, Belgium T +322 282 8301 ************************************************************************************************************ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX I CAA, CAP1145: SAFETY REVIEW OF OFFSHORE PUBLIC TRANSPORT HELICOPTER OPERATIONS IN SUPPORT OF OIL AND THE EXPLOITATION OF OIL AND GAS (FEBRUARY 2014) 44048031v3 Civil Aviation Authority – Safety review of offshore public transport helicopter operations in support of the exploitation of oil and gas CAP 1145 © Civil Aviation Authority 2014 All rights reserved. Copies of this publication may be reproduced for personal use, or for use within a company or organisation, but may not otherwise be reproduced for publication. To use or reference CAA publications for any other purpose, for example within training material for students, please contact the CAA at the address below for formal agreement. Enquiries regarding the content of this publication should be addressed to: Safety and Airspace Regulation Group Civil Aviation Authority Aviation House Gatwick Airport South West Sussex RH6 0YR The latest version of this document is available in electronic format at www.caa.co.uk/publications, where you may also register for e-mail notification of amendments. CAP 1145 Civil Aviation Authority – Safety review of offshore public transport helicopter operations in support of the exploitation of oil and gas www.caa.co.uk 20 February 2014 CAP 1145 Contents Contents Executive summary 7 SECTION A Chapter 1 Introduction and background 9 Introduction 9 Background 9 Aim 11 Chapter 2 The offshore industry and regulatory framework 12 The offshore industry - UK 12 The offshore industry - Norway 14 Regulatory framework 15 Regulatory support and development 17 Chapter 3 The review process 18 SECTION B: ANALYSIS Chapter 4 Occurrence investigation 20 Chapter 5 Accident review 22 Chapter 6 Comparison with Norway 26 Chapter 7 Review of AAIB reports 27 Airworthiness review 28 Operations review 28 SECTION C: PasseNGER SAFETY AND SURVIVABILITY Chapter 8 Background 29 Chapter 9 Ditching and water impact 30 Chapter 10 Fire-fighting 41 February 2014 Page 4 CAP 1145 Contents SECTION D: OperaTIONS Chapter 11 Background 43 Chapter 12 Helicopter operators - organisational matters 45 Safety management systems 45 Operator resilience 46 Chapter 13 Commercial aspects 47 Contracts 47 Globalisation 48 Chapter 14 Operations to helidecks 49 Chapter 15 Operational procedures 51 Standard operating procedures 51 Flight following 51 ‘Exposure’ approval 51 Chapter 16 Air traffic management and offshore communications 53 Chapter 17 Weather and meteorology 55 Chapter 18 Pilot training and performance 57 Pilot training 58 Pilot duties 60 Training material 60 Pilot automation dependency 62 Instructor training 63 Loss of control 63 Examination assessment 64 Pilot helideck operational experience 65 SECTION E: AIrwORTHINESS Chapter 19 Airworthiness scope 66 Chapter 20 Certification requirement development 68 Chapter 21 Extended review of accident reports 70 Chapter 22 Failures advising ‘land immediately’ 72 Chapter 23 Specialist review of MOR data 74 February 2014 Page 5 CAP 1145 Chapter 24 Critical parts 75 Chapter 25 Vibration health monitoring and controlled service introduction 77 Chapter 26 Continuing airworthiness across the operators for the north sea fleet 79 Human factors errors 80 SECTION F: HELICOPTER SAFETY research Chapter 27 Research overview 82 Key areas of research 83 Addressing technical cause accidents 83 Addressing operational cause accidents 84 Addressing external cause accidents 84 Mitigation of accidents 85 Summary 85 SECTION G Chapter 28 Conclusion 87 Safety performance 87 Actions and recommendations 88 Next steps 88 SECTION H Chapter 29 Actions and recommendations 89 February 2014 Page 6 CAP 1145 Executive summary Executive summary The safety of those who rely on offshore helicopter flights is the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) absolute priority. The steps detailed in this report will result in significant improvements in safety for those flying to and from offshore sites in the UK and potentially worldwide. We will monitor and report publicly on the progress of all actions and recommendations. Offshore helicopter services provide a vital link to ensure the viability of the UK’s oil and gas industry. They transfer the majority of the workforce to and from offshore installations in an open sea environment that is both challenging and hazardous. Recent accidents have understandably given rise to serious concerns, particularly with offshore workers who rely so heavily on these helicopter flights. We therefore initiated this review in September 2013 to examine thoroughly the risks and hazards of operating in the North Sea and consider how these can be managed more effectively. The CAA decided to conduct the review in conjunction with the Norwegian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) so that a comparison could be made of any safety or operational differences. An independent peer review group was appointed to challenge the work of the review team to ensure that the objectives of the review were appropriate and being met. In gathering evidence for the review we have engaged with employee representative groups of pilots and the offshore workforce, the oil and gas industry, helicopter operators, manufacturers, government and regulatory bodies and other experts in the field, as well as analysing available data and reports. There were a total of 25 UK offshore helicopter accidents between 1992 and 2013, equating to 1.35 accidents per 100,000 flying hours; seven involved fatalities. Whilst the collective aim is to prevent accident occurrence, it is unrealistic to expect they can be eliminated altogether. Therefore, the protection of passengers and crew following an accident formed an essential part of the review. The CAA has identified actions to improve the survivability of accidents that include: Prohibiting helicopter flights
Recommended publications
  • A Care Ethics Analysis of the Piper Alpha Oil Platform Disaster STS Research Paper Presented to the Faculty of the School of En

    A Care Ethics Analysis of the Piper Alpha Oil Platform Disaster STS Research Paper Presented to the Faculty of the School of En

    A Care Ethics Analysis of the Piper Alpha Oil Platform Disaster STS Research Paper Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia By Summer Xu October 31st, 2019 On my honor as a University student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments. Signed: _______________________________________________ Approved: _______________________________________ Date ________________________ Benjamin Laugelli, Department of Engineering and Society Introduction On July 6, 1988, a sequence of explosions and failures across the Piper Alpha oil platform, owned by Occidental Petroleum, resulted in the death of 167 workers in the world’s deadliest offshore oil industry disaster, in terms of human fatalities. This case has become a landmark in industry safety, as it helped to establish industrial safety standards, has pushed safety research forwards, and has served as a crucial example of safety in engineering practice (Nasa Safety Center, 2013). Currently, several scholars agree upon the lack of organizational integrity and technical redundancies that ultimately resulted in the Piper Alpha disaster. Scholars are especially focused on placing the blame on the technological failures and regulatory insufficiencies that allowed such a tragic sequence of events to unfold (Cullen, 2018). However, despite being such a famous landmark of engineering safety, virtually no literature exists evaluating the morality of those who should be held responsible. A failure to recognize the ethical stake engineers play in their design will allow engineers to continue blindly following rules and regulations, rather than understanding their obligation to act ethically for the good of the greater whole.
  • Extracts From…

    Extracts From…

    Extracts from…. The VMARS News Sheet Issue 147 June 2015 British Post War Air Defence Radar been largely cobbled together, developed, At 07:00 On 29th August 1949, the Steppes of modified and added to as the demands of war northeast Kazakhstan were shaken by a huge dictated, but which still formed the bedrock of explosion as the USSR detonated a nuclear test bomb British air defence capability in 1949. A report was as the culmination of Operation First Lightning, the commissioned, in which it identified weaknesses first of the 456 Soviet nuclear tests destined to take in detecting aircraft at high altitude, geographical place in that region over the following 40 years. Since areas that were inadequately covered, poor IFF July 1945, when the first nuclear bomb test was systems, an outdated communications and carried out in New Mexico, the USA had been the reporting network and obsolete equipment with only country to possess a nuclear capability and the poor reliability, leaving Britain vulnerable to a news that the USSR was now similarly equipped, Soviet nuclear attack. Even so, the possibility of stunned America. Relations between the USSR and high altitude Soviet TU-4s carrying 20 megaton Western governments had deteriorated rapidly nuclear bombs reaching British shores undetected following the end of the war with Germany and in a was insufficient to motivate the government humiliating defeat of Joseph Stalin’s attempts to Treasury department to loosen their purse strings isolate Berlin from the western Allied nations of sufficiently for anything more urgent than a 10 Britain, USA and France, the Russian blockade of year programme of renewal.
  • RAF Football Association - E-Bulletin

    RAF Football Association - E-Bulletin

    RAF Football Association - E-Bulletin RAF FA CUP ‘THE KEITH CHRISTIE TROPHY’ AND RAF FA PLATE 19/20 UPDATE With the RAF Cup now in full swing, the second round produced some more exciting ties and saw some big names exit the competition. RAF Leeming’s away trip to Akrotiri was the eagerly anticipated tie of the round, however it proved to be a tough trip for the visitors as they were on the receiving end of a heavy 5-1 defeat. SAC Liam Thornton grabbed four of the goals, taking his overall tally to six and making him the current top scorer in the competition. RAF Brize Norton faced the long journey up to Lossiemouth and it proved to be successful as they ground out a 1-0 win with Sgt Dave Wanless scoring the all-important goal, Brize Norton will be hoping for a slightly shorter journey if they are drawn away in the next round. SAC Liam Wood scored his first two goals of the competition helping RAF Northolt to an away win at Wyton with RAF Coningsby also picking up a convincing away victory running out 4-0 winner against JFC Chicksands & RAF Henlow. RAF Honington who have a great history with the competition were knocked out at the hands of RAF Odiham thanks to a single goal from SAC Clarke Goulding. RAF FA E-Bulletin – RAF Cup Update Elsewhere, RAF Shawbury and RAF Marham both scored four goals each to take them through with victories over MOD St Athan and RAF Waddington respectively. RAF Boulmer also strolled through to the next round with an impressive 7-1 victory over RAF Cranwell.
  • Defence and Security After Brexit Understanding the Possible Implications of the UK’S Decision to Leave the EU Compendium Report

    Defence and Security After Brexit Understanding the Possible Implications of the UK’S Decision to Leave the EU Compendium Report

    Defence and security after Brexit Understanding the possible implications of the UK’s decision to leave the EU Compendium report James Black, Alex Hall, Kate Cox, Marta Kepe, Erik Silfversten For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1786 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: HMS Vanguard (MoD/Crown copyright 2014); Royal Air Force Eurofighter Typhoon FGR4, A Chinook Helicopter of 18 Squadron, HMS Defender (MoD/Crown copyright 2016); Cyber Security at MoD (Crown copyright); Brexit (donfiore/fotolia); Heavily armed Police in London (davidf/iStock) RAND Europe is a not-for-profit organisation whose mission is to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.rand.org/randeurope Defence and security after Brexit Preface This RAND study examines the potential defence and security implications of the United Kingdom’s (UK) decision to leave the European Union (‘Brexit’).
  • Paying for the Piper

    Paying for the Piper

    Series Editors Tony Elger and Peter Fairbrother Centre for Comparative Labour Studies Department of Sociology University of Warwick PAYING FOR THE PIPER .... has all the hallmarks of [the authors'] previous works •.. the vivid style, the careful description of tactical debates and the eye for telling detail ... a highly readable, often fascinating account of a grim and depressing saga.' John Kelly, Senior Lecturer in Industrial Relations, London School of Economics. Editor, British J6l1rJUd of Indwtrial Relations The North Sea oil industry has been riven by industrial conflict, human tragedy and disaster. This book investigates the crisis of industrial relations which followed the 1988 Piper Alpha disaster, the world's worst offshore accident. in which 167 oil workers died. The strikes which followed in 1989 and 1990 challenged the health and safety practices upon which the system of offshore production had been based, rejecting as unacceptably high the human price of oil extraction. In mounting this challenge the labour force precipitated a fundamental strategic shift in the political economy of the British oil and gas industry. Paying for die Pi;erIDllkes the first serious appraisal of the current offshore safety regulatory regime instituted af't:« Piper Alpha, and of the oil industry's attempts to contain subsequent ~e re~ry interference. It concludes that. as yet. offshore safety is little or not at aB_~ _ anthon also examine the fraught history of trade unionism in the offshore ,e.~ successful strategies of employers to sustain a virtually union-free r~1I"he ~t over health and safety offshore has been inextricably bound up widt'the~es brutal struggle over union rights as the workforce has attempted to rive voice in the reform of safety and production standards.
  • Safety of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations: Lessons from Past Accident Analysis

    Safety of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations: Lessons from Past Accident Analysis

    Safety of offshore oil and gas operations: Lessons from past accident analysis Ensuring EU hydrocarbon supply through better control of major hazards Michalis Christou and Myrto Konstantinidou 2012 Report EUR 25646 EN European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport Contact information Michalis Christou Address: Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, TP 230, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +39 0332 78 9516 Fax: +39 0332 78 6671 http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ This publication is a Reference Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/. JRC77767 EUR 25646 EN ISBN 978-92-79-27954-6 (print) ISBN 978-92-79-28004-7 (pdf) ISSN 1018-5593 (print) ISSN 1018-9424 (online) doi:10.2790/71887 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012 © European Union, 2012 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Italy Instead of Foreword “…. Deepwater energy exploration and production, particularly at the frontiers of experience, involve risks for which neither industry nor government has been adequately prepared, but for which they can and must be prepared in the future.
  • List of Current Isolated Unit Status (ISU) Locations for the Army And

    List of Current Isolated Unit Status (ISU) Locations for the Army And

    Ministry of Defence Main Building Whitehall London SW1A 2HB United Kingdom Telephone : +44 (0)20 721 89000 Our Reference: FOI2016/00421 9 February 2016 Dear , Thank you for your email to the Ministry of Defence (MOD) dated 12 January in which you requested the following information: My request is: How many Units in the Armed Forces, broken down by individual Service (Royal Navy, Army and RAF), had Isolated Unit Status in 2005? How many Units in the Armed Forces, broken down by individual Service (Royal Navy, Army and RAF), had Isolated Unit Status in 2010? How many Units in the Armed Forces, broken down by individual Service (Royal Navy, Army and RAF), had Isolated Unit Status in 2015? I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) 2000. Following a search of our records, I can confirm that the MOD does hold some information relating to your request. The Royal Navy have confirmed that no locations currently have Isolated Unit Status (IUS) The Army have provided the following list of current IUS locations: 14 Signal Regiment, Brawdy Upavon Station Albemarle Barracks, Northumberland Army Foundation College, Harrogate The following overseas units also have IUS status: British Army Training Unit Kenya British Army Training Unit Suffield (Canada) British Army Training and Support Unit Belize Nepal Brunei The Royal Air Force (RAF) has provided the following current IUS locations: RAF Boulmer Remote Radar Head Benbecula RAF Fylingdales Force Development Training Centre Fairbourne RAF Honington RAF Linton-On-Ouse RAF Leeming RAF Staxton Wold RAF Spadeadam RAF Valley RAF Marham Please note that information prior to 2011 is not held.
  • SCOPING REVIEW: a Needs-Based Assessment and Epidemiological Community-Based Survey of Ex-Service Personnel and Their Families in Scotland

    SCOPING REVIEW: a Needs-Based Assessment and Epidemiological Community-Based Survey of Ex-Service Personnel and Their Families in Scotland

    SCOPING REVIEW: A Needs-Based Assessment and Epidemiological Community-Based Survey of Ex-Service Personnel and their Families in Scotland FINAL REPORT Professor Susan Klein1 1Director, Aberdeen Centre for Trauma Research, Institute for Health & Welfare Research, Robert Gordon University 2 Emeritus Professor David A Alexander 2 Former Director, Aberdeen Centre for Trauma Research, Institute for Health & Welfare Research, Robert Gordon University IN COLLABORATION WITH: 3 Dr Walter Busuttil 3 Director Medical Services, Combat Stress, Tyrwhitt House, Leatherhead December 2012 CONTENTS Acknowledgements 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms 7 Executive Summary 11 Section 1: Introduction 21 1.1 Background to the Scoping Review 21 1.2 Terms of Reference 21 1.2.1 Aim 22 1.2.2 Objectives 23 1.2.3 Parameters of the Scoping Review 23 1.2.4 Methodological Framework and Analytic Strategy 24 1.3 Format of the Report 25 Section 2: Veteran-Related Policy, Strategy & Commitments 26 2.1 Preface 26 2.2 Role, Composition, and Ethos of the UK Armed Forces 27 2.3 Scotland‘s Contribution to the UK Armed Forces 31 2.4 Composition of the Veteran Community 31 2.5 Key Drivers of Veteran-Related Policy and Strategy 33 2.6 Moral and Social Factors 36 2.6.1 Recognition of Sacrifice 36 2.6.2 ―Duty of Care‖ 38 2.6.3 No Disadvantage 38 2.7 Economic Factors 39 2.7.1 Recruitment 39 2.7.2 Retention 39 2.7.3 Litigation 40 2.8 Political Factors 41 2.8.1 Public Support 41 2.8.2 Social Exclusion 42 2.9 Evolution of Veterans Policy and Strategy 43 Section 3: Provision of Healthcare and
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Monday Volume 577 17 March 2014 No. 137 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 17 March 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 533 17 MARCH 2014 534 of new contracts is even greater with over a third of all House of Commons new contracts placed with SMEs in each of the last three years. Monday 17 March 2014 Mrs Madeleine Moon (Bridgend) (Lab): Devolved Administrations and their arm’s length agencies often The House met at half-past Two o’clock have very close relationships with their SME community. What discussions is the Ministry of Defence having with the devolved Administrations to make sure defence PRAYERS contractors based outside England also have an opportunity to bid? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Dunne: Of course defence, and therefore defence procurement, is not a devolved matter and therefore the work the Ministry of Defence does is primarily with industries right across the country. I have undertaken Oral Answers to Questions events in Scotland and I am looking forward to an event in Wales in due course later this year. DEFENCE Angus Robertson (Moray) (SNP): May I wish you a very happy St Patrick’s day, Mr Speaker, and no doubt MOD Ministers will be pleased to put on record their The Secretary of State was asked— appreciation for the increasing co-operation with the Irish defence forces? Military Procurement In a parliamentary answer on 3 October 2011 the MOD admitted that out of 6,000 SME contracts with 1.
  • Foi2014/02622 Outstanding Ministry of Defence Contracts with Serco, G4s, Babylon Translations, Kbr and Tq Education & Training

    Foi2014/02622 Outstanding Ministry of Defence Contracts with Serco, G4s, Babylon Translations, Kbr and Tq Education & Training

    FOI2014/02622 OUTSTANDING MINISTRY OF DEFENCE CONTRACTS WITH SERCO, G4S, BABYLON TRANSLATIONS, KBR AND TQ EDUCATION & TRAINING Current Current Contract contract value Contract Number Contract Title contract Current vendor start date (attributable end date to vendor) AWE MANAGEMENT & OPERATION CONTRACT FOR AWE NUC41A/5001 1 Dec 1999 30 Nov 2024 MANAGEMENT £2,799,331,548 (ALDERMASTON) LIMITED CSVHC/04 HEAVY EQUIPMENT TRANSPORTER (HET) PFI 14 Dec 2001 1 Jul 2024 FASTTRAX LIMITED £292,484,836 PTC/CB/00642 MULTI ENGINE PILOT TRAINING AT RAF CRANWELL 1 Apr 2004 31 Mar 2014 SERCO LIMITED £163,458,884 REPAIR AND POST DESIGN SERVICES FOR E190 AVCOMM2/1433 15 Nov 2004 31 Mar 2014 SERCO LIMITED £403,855 EQUIPMENT CAMPUS INTEGRATOR FOR THE DEFENCE CBC(PI)038 10 Feb 2005 31 Aug 2028 SERCO LIMITED £475,524,944 ACADEMY SUPPORT TO COVER FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF AVCOMM4/0235 26 Aug 2005 30 Sep 2014 SERCO LIMITED £8,580,274 GENERAL PURPOSE SUSPENSION TEST SET CSIS/00143 SEMAPHORE TECHNICAL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 1 Apr 2006 30 Jun 2014 SERCO LIMITED £2,377,866 DSTL/AGR/00115/01 PRIME CONTRACT FOR PROJECT INSPIRE 1 Aug 2006 31 Mar 2021 SERCO LIMITED £490,143,191 PRIME CONTRACT (PC) INFRASTRUCTURE KELLOGG BROWN DE35/8074 13 Oct 2006 31 Mar 2012 £233,510,716 SUPPORT PROVIDER (ISP) - AFGHANISTAN & ROOT LIMITED PROVISION OF GENERAL PURPOSE SUSPENSION TECM/0193 EQUIPMENT AND RADIO FREQUENCY FILTER TEST 11 Dec 2006 30 Sep 2014 SERCO LIMITED £1,250,000 SETS THE PROVISION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT CS4D/2087 12 Dec 2006 30 Jun 2014 SERCO LIMITED £5,501,339 FOR 7 BATTALION
  • Royal Air Force (County) Football Association

    Royal Air Force (County) Football Association

    Royal Air Force (County) Football Association Oicial Handbook 2017-18 Handbook 2017-18 Table of Contents Page Foreword 6 Board of Trustees and Officers 12 Leagues 16 Royal Air Force (County) Football Association 17 Regional Directors and OIC Contacts 20 Objects, Membership and Affiliation of the Association 31 Respect - Codes of Conduct 35 Association Regulations - Travel 39 Rules and Regulations - General 41 Rules and Regulations - Competitions 47 Matches against Foreign Clubs 53 On-Field Disciplinary Procedures 56 Football Debt Recovery 73 Disciplinary Commissions and Appeal Boards 75 Disciplinary Procedures Dealt with by Affiliated Associations 78 Regulations for FA Appeals 81 Safeguarding Adults at Risk 86 Kit and Advertising Regulations 94 Third Generation (3G) Football Turf Pitches 102 The Football Association Equality Policy 103 Referees- Roll of Officers 104 Referees' Committee 105 Guide to Marking Referees 106 Rules Governing RAF Referees 107 Regulations for the Registration and Control of Referees 122 Goalpost Safety Guidelines 138 Goalpost and Pitch Sizes 139 Guidance Notes on Line Marking of Football Pitches 141 Inter-Service Champions 144 Inter-Service Champions (Ladies) 145 Inter-Service Champions (U23) 146 President's Cup Winners 147 Jubilee Cup Winners 148 RAF FA Challenge Cup Winners 149 RAF FA Junior Challenge Cup Winners 150 RAF Inter League / Inter Region (White Cup) Winners 151 RAF FA Festival of Football Winners 152 RAF FA Ladies Inter-Station Cup Winners 153 RAF FA Veterans Cup Winners 154 RAF FA Club of the Year
  • Issues 60 to 69

    Issues 60 to 69

    “Bristol” BLENHEIM The Journal of the Blenheim Society List of Contents Abbreviations for rank: Other Ranks Notes & Search Words: G/Cpt Group Captain LAC Leading Aircraftsman Main categories in this column are: W/Cdr Wing Commander AC1 Aircraftsman 1st Class People Places Sq/Ldr Squadron Leader AC2 Aircraftsman 2nd Class Squadrons Dates F/Lt Flight Lieutenant Bristol Blenheim (BB) Serial numbers F/O Flying Officer Other abbreviations P/O Pilot Officer CO Commanding Officer For ease of search & consistency: NCOs Non Commissioned Officers Wop/AG Wireless operator/Air gunner Dates are written as: dd/mm/yyyy W/O Warrant Officer Obs Observer (navigator) or (if month only): mm/yyyy F/Sgt Flight Sergeant OTU Operation Training Unit Squadrons listed as: 18Sq, 21Sq, etc Sgt Sergeant Kia Killed in Action Ref to journals: Issue 56, page 4 = 56/4 Cpl Corporal Other less frequently used abbreviations are listed at end Contact details (email, phone, address) given in the journal are not shown here. To respond to any requests for information please use the email address at the bottom of the website Issue 69: March 2011 Topic Page Type Title Author Notes & Search Words 1 Report An Easter Message Graham Progress on Mk I BB slow dues to lack of from our President Warner funds. Try to increase sale of Draw tickets. Stall sales by Ron Scott et al doing well. 1 Report Chairman’s Andrew £26,000 raised in 2010 (& £120,000 in last Comments Pierce 10 years) for Blenheim. Current work on engines expensive. Concern that cuts in RAF could affect Air Shows; last displays by a Harrier and Nimrod.