DOCSLIB.ORG

Tsubota Et Al 2003 Hikobia14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tsubota Et Al 2003 Hikobia14 Hikobial4:55-702003 MOlecularphylo窪enyOftheGrimmiales(Musci)basedOnchlOroplast mcLsequencesI HIRoMITsuBoTA,YuMIAGENo,BELENEsTEBANEz,ＴＯＭＩoYAMAGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucHI TsuBoTA，Ｈ､，AGENo，Ｙ､，EsTEBANEz，Ｂ，YAMAGucHI，Ｔ＆DEGucHI，Ｈ、2003． MolecularphylogenyoftheGrimmiales(Musci)basedonchloroplastr6cLsequences・ Hikobial4:55-70． FamilialcircumscriptionsoftheGrimmialesandtheirallies，includingthe Orimmiaceae，thePtychomitriaceaeandtheSeligeriaceae，havebeenrepeatedly discussedHerewepresentphylogeneticinferencesontheGrimmiaceaeandtheir ロ alliesbasedonmaximumlikelihoodanalysesofchloroplast76cLgenesequences・ Oursmdyshowsthat（１）theGrimmiaceae(s」at.)withtheinclusionofthegenera CtJ叩〕ﾉﾉosje/伽ａｎｄＰ〃c〃o〃か伽lismonophyletic;(2)Ｇ〃んo〃"伽hasaclose affinitytMrcjoaoftheDicranales;(3)theSeligeriaceaefblmadistinctcladesisterto theGrimmiaceae（s・lat)；（４）theGrimmiales（s」at.）withtheinclusionofthe SeligeriaceaearemonophyleticwhentheDrummondiaceae,theScouleriaceaeandthe Wardiaceaeareomitted;ａｎｄ(5)theDrummondiaceae-Scouleriaceaecladeappearsat thebasalpositionofthehaplolepidousmossgroupDicranidae，adjacenttothe Bryoxiphiaceae．SincethemonophylyoftheGrimmiales(s」at.)includingmembers oftheSeligeriaceaeiswellsupported,weproposeherethattheordercanbetreatedin awidesense,andincludesfamilieswhichhaveinｃｏｍｍｏｎｔｈｅＧ伽〃α/Mjgel･ja typeperistome、 H1、伽乃"Ｍα,Ｔｂ〃ｏ】'bwmg"cﾙﾉ＆ﾉﾌﾞﾉｧo"MDegz`chj,ＤＥｐｑ"ｍｅ"'ｑ/Ｄｊｏ/ogjcaノ 比je"Ｃｅ，Ｇｍａ"α/ｅ比/ioo／ｑ／Sbje"Ｃｅ,〃ｉｍｓｈｊ"ｚａＵ７ｍﾉeﾊﾉﾉﾘﾉ,ＫｔＪｇα"!(〕ﾉαｍα／-3-/， HjgZzsﾙﾉｰﾊjrosh〃α-sﾊﾉ,HIrosh〃α7398526,ノヒＷｎ ＹｊｌｍＭｇｅ"０，Depα"ｍｅ"／ｑ/Ｄｉｏ/OgjcaノＳｂ/e"Ｃｅ，ＦｔＪＭｌｌ〕ノｑ／Ｓｂｊｅ"Ｃｅ，脇、s/i〃α 肋加e'Fjlﾜﾉ,KtJgzJmJi〕′α"zα/-3-/,ノリｉｇａＷ－ｈ"ｏｓｈｊ"Ｔａ－ｓｈｊ,HIroSﾙ〃α739-8526,.ﾉﾋJpα〃 Be/6〃ＥＳ肋α"ez，Depα"α"Te"'０火Ｂｊｏ/oｇｊａ（Bor伽αZﾉ，Ｆａｃ"ﾉﾉα`ノ火Ｃｉｅ"ｃｊａｓ， 肋ⅣＣＭ/､１Ｍ伽"o"zα火MIC/rj仏280ｲ,α"/o6/α"ＣＯ,Mzc/ｒｊ仏Slpaj〃 TheorderGrimmialesisoneofthebasalmem- Orimmiaceae（asGrinunieae）andPtychomitria- bersofthehaplolepidousmosses，ａcconmodat- ceae（asPtychomitrieae）intheGrimmiales（as ingthetwofamiliesGrimmiaceaeandPtychomi- Grimmiaceae)inthefirsteditionof"Dienatiirli- triaceae・TheorderSeligeriales，accommodating chenPHanzenfamilien，，、Subsequently,Brotherｕｓ 品 thefamilySeligeriaceae，isalsooneofthebasal (1924-1925）transferredthePtychomitriaceaeto orders・Circumscriptionandtaxonomicposition thelsobryales、Nyholm（1954-1960)placedthe ofthefamiliesGrimmiaceae，Ptychomitriaceae， PtychomitriaceaeintheEubryales，inwhichare Seligeriaceaeandtheirallieshavebeenrepeat- includedthefamiliesprimarilywithadiplolepi- edlydiscussedAfterthefirstdescriptionofthe dousperistome:Bryaceae,Mniaceae,Aulacomnia- GrimmiaceaeasanindependentfamilybyArnott ceae，Meesiaceae，Timniaceae，Catoscopiaceae， (1825)，manyworkersvariouslyproposedtheir Bartramiaceae，Orthotrichaceae，andHedwigia- systemsontheGrimmiaceaeandtheirallies ceaeNoguchi（1954)discussedtherelationship (Tableｌ）Brotheruｓ（1901-1902）placedthe betweenPltW/io〃/伽加，Ｇ７加伽ａａｎｄＲａｃｏ〃ノー rj"mbasedonleafstrucmres，especiallyoma- lContributionfmmtheLaboratoryofPlantTaxonomy mentationofleafcells,ａｎｄｐｌａｃｅｄＰひc/io〃〃i"m andEcology,HiroshimaUniversity､ＮＳｅｒ・No.５２６． intheGrimmiaceae・Noguchi（1974)suggested 5６ ＨｉｋｏｂｉａＶｏｌｌ４,No.1，２００３ thatRaco伽かｊ"misanintennediategenusbe- PCRamplificationsofsegmentsfbr『bcLgene， tweｅｎＰｔＷｈｏｍかj"ｍａｎｄＧｒ加伽ａｏｎｔｈｅｂａｓｉｓ anddirectsequenceanalyseswerecarriedoutus- ｏｆｔｈｅｌｅａｆｃｅｌｌｓａｎｄｅｘothecialcelldevelopment、 ingstandardconditionsaccordingtothemanufac- Deguchi(1979)treatedP〃c〃o加伽"ｍａｓａｍｅｍ‐ turer'sinstructionsReactionswereperfbnnedin beroftheGrimmiaceaeemphasizingthemorpho- athennalcycler（ThermalCycler9600,Perkin logicalandanatomicalaffinityofcalyptra，leaf Elmer)withPCRamplificationkitsandsynthetic cellsandsetatwistingVitt(1984),andBuckand primers(TsubotaeM/200lb)．DirectDNAse‐ Goffinet（2000）treatedthePtychomitriaceaeas quenceanalysisofthePCRproductswasper- anindependentfamilyoftheGrimmiaceaelnre- lbnnedusingABIorAmershamkitsaccordingto centyears，severalmolecularphylogeneticworks themanufacturer1sinstructions・Thesequences relevanttothephylogenyofhaplolepidousmoss- wereelectrophoresedonautomatedsequencers eshavebeencarriedout(LaFarge＆coworkers (ABI373AandABIPmSM310),andanalyzed 2000,2002;GofTmete/α/､2001),showingthe onthedata-analysisSystems、Thesequencesob- monophylyoftheGrimmialesandSeligeriales， tainedinthepresentstudyweresubmittedtothe ａｌｔｈｏｕｇｈｔｈｅｎｕｍｂｅｒｓｏｆＯＴＵｓｆｂｒｔｈeseorders ＤＤＢＪ/ＥＭＢＬ/GenBanklnternationalNucleotide seemtobenotenoughtoclarifyanddiscusstheir SequenceDatabaseCollaborationDetailsand phylogeneticpositionswithinthesystem・ fUrtherinfbnnationfbrDNAextractingprotocols， Theohjectivesofthisstudywere:（１）tocon‐ amplificationprimers，PCRprotocolsandthose structaphylogenetictreefbrtheGrimmiaceae， ofsequencingreactionsaredescribedpreviously theSeligeriaceaeandtheiralliesbasedonmaxi- inTsubotaandcoWorkers(1999,2000,2001a,ｂ） mumlikelihoodcriteria；（２）ｔｏｔｅｓｔｔｈｅｍｏｎｏ‐ Ｓｂ"'cesα"`Ｍ"αかze`、"α phylyofthefamiliesandclarifytheftlmilialand Dataset--9076cLgenesequencesfbr86moss genericrelationshipsWepresentberephylog- specieswereexaminedfbrtheanalyses(Table２， eneticinferencesfbrthefamiliespreviouslytreat- withＤＤＢＪ/EMBL/GenBankAccessionNos.） edintheGrimmialesandSeligeriales，basedon The76cLgenesequencesofthegrinmialeanand themaximum-likelihood(ＭＬ)analysesof90se- seligerialeanmossesweremanuallyalignedwith quencesofthechloroplastribulｏｓｅｌ,5-bisphos- ７１mosssequencesregisteredintheDNAdata- phatecarboxylase/oxygenaselargesubunit(『bcL)， base、Outgrouptaxawereselectedbasedonthe togetherwithrecentinfbnnationonthemolecular phylogenetichypothesispropｏｓｅｄｂｙＬａＦａｒｇｅｅ／ phylogenyofgrimmialeanmosses，anddiscuss α/､(2000)andTsubotaetal.(ｉｎｍｓ.,andtheab‐ theimplicationsofourfindingsontheGrimmia- stractoftheMOSymposium2003） ceaeandtheirrelatedfamilies． 』ﾉﾉg""?e"j-Manualalignmentwascarriedout ibrthedatasetagainstacompleteγbcLsequence Materialsandlnethods ofLe"co6M/"zsca6r"ｍ(ABO29388)withanedi- torprogramandouroriginalprogram，Sclean Phylogeneticanalysesbasedonther6cLgene 287（Tsubotal998-2003，inourhttpsites,see sequenceswereperfbnnedfbllowingthemethods AppendixB)．Undetenninedsites,gaps,andre‐ ofTsubotaandcoworkers（1999,2001a,2002)． gionsnotclearlyalignablefiDrallsequenceswere ② Themethodconsistsoftwosteps:（１）detennin- excludedfiomtheanalyses・Amongsequences ingsequencedata(DNAextractionPCRamplifl- aligned，identicalsequencesarerepresentedbya cationandDNAsequencing，orDNAdatabase singlesequence,andanunalignablesequencewas homologysearch);and(2)dataanalyses， omittedftomthedatasets． ＤＭ欧伽ajo",ＰＣＲ。〃/抗cα/ｊｏ〃α"`/Ｄ/V,４ A"αｌｂＭＭｍ"oqb Se9"e"cmg Treeswereconstructedbythefbllowingthree TotalDNAiswereextractedfi･omfiPeshsamples methods:theneighborjoining(NJ;Saitou＆Nei ordriedherbariumspecimensbymodificationsof l987)，themaximum-parsimony（ＭＰ；Fitch thｅＣＴＡＢｍethod(Murray＆Thompsonl98u l971),andthemaximum-likelihood(ＭＬ;Felsen- Arikawa＆Higuchil999;TsubotaeM2000)or steinl981)．Thetreesobtainedbythethree phenol-chlorofbrmmethod(TsubotaeM/1999)． methodswereappraisedbythelog-likelihood HTsuBoTA,Ｙ・ＡGENｏ,BEsTEBANEz,ＴＹＡＭＡＧｕｃＨＩＡＮＤＨ・DEGucHI 5７ measurewithNucMLinMOLPHY23b3(Ada- MJx〃"川ﾉﾉﾋcﾉﾉﾉjooaα"α加応一MLtreeswere chi＆Hasegawal996,seeAppendixB） constructedwithNucMＬｉｎＭＯＬＰＨＹａｎｄｆａｓｔ－ Ｄｊｓｊα"Ｃｅα"α11〕入,jJ-ANJtreewasconstructed ＤＮＡｍｌ1.2.2(Olsenetα/､1994)．InMLanaly- withNuｃＭＬａｎｄＮＪｄｉｓｔｉｎＭＯＬＰＨＹｕｓｉｎｇｔｈｅ ses，thebest-confbnnedtransition/transversion ＨＫY85model（Hasegawae/αＬ1985）fbrthe (Ts/ＴＶ）parameterwasestimatedbyNucML distanceestimations accordingtocalculationswiththeHKY85model PZJ芯加o'1Ｗ"αOA,js-MPtreeswereconstructed employingthe“-topt，,optionparameteras2､093 byPAUPRat(Sikes＆Lewis2001),whichisa (as4185intheNucMLnotationalsystem)．ML tooltoimplementtheParsimonyRatchetsearches treeswereconstructedwiththelocalrearrange- (Nixonl999)withPAUP*,overPAUP40blO mentsearchffomtｈｅＮＪｔｒｅｅｂｙＮｕｃＭＬａｎｄ (Swoffbrd2002)．hanalysesbyPAUPRat,MP ＮＪｄｉｓｔＩｎａｎａｌｙｓｅｓｂｙｆｔｌｓｔＤＮＡｍｌ，MLtrees treesweresearchedusingtheParsimonyRatchet weresearchedwiththeglobalrearrangements searchstrategyintwenty200iterationruns． optionsTheTs/Tｖｐａｒａｍｅｔｅｒｗａｓｔｈｅｎｕｓｅｄａｓ Table１．ＣｌassificationsoftheOrimmiaceae,PtychomitriaceaeandSeligeriaceae,orpartsoftheftlmily， andpossiblyrelatedgenera・Thetableshowsthedistributionoffamiliesandgenerathathavebeencon- sideredtobelongingtotheGrimmialesandSeligerialesatonetimeoranotherandincludedinthepresent analysis． Ｂｍｃｈ＆Schimper Schimper(1876）Limpricht(1885-1889）Brothems('901-1902）Fleischer(1915-1923） (1837-1846） Seligeriaceae Seligeriaceae Seligeriaceae Dicranaceae 、icranales 6MgUJ7a Seligerieae Stﾀﾉﾙg［?rm Seligerieae Seligeriaceae Bﾉﾉ"c/ｍ Sｾﾉ'9℃rm Bﾉﾉ"ぬａ 比｣I/gcr/α StWgw、 ＣｂｍＰﾘﾉﾉbsje"zｲ耐 Blindieae β〃7c/7ａ βﾉﾉ"cﾒﾉα B"、ﾉｶﾞﾋJ Campylosteliaceae OIthotrichaceae Brachyodonteae Bmcﾉ(〕ﾉﾋﾞﾉb""""１ Grimmiaceae Grimmiales P〃Ｃ〃ｏｍｊｗ""l Cmγ収ｿﾉbsだ"""７ ｃｍ"ﾉﾌﾘﾉﾉＯＳ雌ﾉﾉ""l Ptychomitrieae Grimmiaceae Gblp"o"""７２ｨ"’ G卯/､'''/かｊ"ｍ Sbo"ん'･ｍ ＣＤＳＣｊ"odb〃 Grimmiaceae Grimmiaceae ＰｌＤﾉcho'"ｊ"ｍｍ Ｃｂｓｃｊ"ocjb〃 Grimmieae Cinclidonteae ＥＵ《gOlMo""""'"７ Ｓと〃jSj減""’ Grimmiaceae Gr/"ｍｍＪ C/"cﾉﾉﾋﾉＷ"ｓ ｃｔJ"ﾘﾘﾉﾉnFje"""１ ０r/〃〃ね Sb〃ｊｓｊ城""ｊ Ｒａｃｏｍｊかｊ"m （Sbo"ん'ね） Scoulerieae Ｒ力αＣＯ"""７""Z Ｇ'･〃”ｊａ Ptychomitrieae Ｇｒｉｍｍｉｅａｅ SboMIerm Ｒａｃｏ"""７"'〃 CoFcj"ocﾉb〃 Ｓｂ"1F'jdh/"l Grimmieae Isobryales Ｐ〃c〃ｏｍｊ"7"m CQFc"Todb〃 Cosc/"ＯＬ/b〃 Erpodiaceae GOlpﾉｍｍｊ"７""’ Ｇﾉﾌﾞ"1"ｊｍ Ｇ'．ｊ"ｌ"Jliq EJipoa7""' Ｒａｃｏ〃"'７""l Grj"'""α 随"/"rje"b「 Ptychomitrieae Ｓｃ"ｌＷｊ的Ⅲ"ノ Orthotrichaceae Bmc伽花ﾙﾉｨ"’ Ｒｈａｃｏ"ﾉﾉ〃/""Ｉ G〃んo"'ｊ"７""， （PI(〕ﾉc力o""か/""7） Ｃ、"Pﾘﾉﾉbsr/e"Ⅲ"】 （GOlp/io"""72J"'） （Ch1”γﾉbs'e""腕） Dixon(1924） Brothems(1924-1925）Jones(1933)inGrout，NyhoIm('954-1960）Churchill(1981） ＆GrouMl936） Dicranaceae Dicranales Bryales Dicranales Grimmiaceae Seligerieae Seligeriaceae Seligeriaceae Seligeriaceae Grimmioideae Sb/jgU7m「 Sc/jg〃ね Scﾉigcrm Bﾉﾉ'7., GJ7"】"】ね「 Dicraneae β肋めα B""｡、 sｾﾉﾉgヅノα Ｓどんな'枕""７ B""ぬａ Ｂ'pcﾉiyzjb""z'"’ Coscinodontoideae Grimmiales
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Systematic Botany 29(1):29-41. 2004 Doi
    Systematic Botany 29(1):29-41. 2004 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364404772973960 Phylogenetic Relationships of Haplolepideous Mosses (Dicranidae) Inferred from rps4 Gene Sequences Terry A. Heddersonad, Donald J. Murrayb, Cymon J. Coxc, and Tracey L. Nowella aBolus Herbarium, Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, Republic of South Africa bThe Birmingham Botanical Garden, Westbourne Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3TR U. K. cDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 dAuthor for Correspondence ( [email protected]) Abstract The haplolepideous mosses (Dicranidae) constitute a large group of ecologically and morphologically diverse species recognised primarily by having peristome teeth with a single row of cells on the dorsal surface. The reduction of sporophytes in numerous moss lineages renders circumscription of the Dicranidae problematic. Delimitation of genera and higher taxa within it has also been difficult. We analyse chloroplast-encoded rps4 gene sequences for 129 mosses, including representatives of nearly all the haplolepideous families and subfamilies, using parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian criteria. The data set includes 59 new sequences generated for this study. With the exception of Bryobartramia, which falls within the Encalyptaceae, the Dicranidae are resolved in all analyses as a monophyletic group including the extremely reduced Archidiales and Ephemeraceae. The monotypic Catoscopium, usually assigned to the Bryidae is consistently resolved as sister to Dicranidae, and this lineage has a high posterior probability under the Bayesian criterion. Within the Dicranidae, a core clade is resolved that comprises most of the species sampled, and all analyses identify a proto-haplolepideous grade of taxa previously placed in various haplolepideous families.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?
    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 072–097 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7 Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution? MicHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2 & ELENA V. MASLOVA3 1 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Belgorod State University, Pobedy Square, 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-042X * author for correspondence: �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6315 Abstract The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES FACT SHEET Ryszard's Racomitrium Moss
    SPECIES FACT SHEET Common Name: Ryszard's racomitrium moss Scientific Name: Codriophorus ryszardii Recent synonyms: Racomitrium ryszardii. All reports of Racomitrium aquaticum (= Codriophorus aquaticus) from North America refer to Codriophorus ryszardii. Division: Bryophyta Class: Bryopsida Order: Grimmiales Family: Grimmiaceae Taxonomic Note: All North American records for Codriophorus aquaticus (= Racomitrium aquaticum) have been renamed Codriophorus ryszardii (= Racomitrium ryszardii), and C. aquaticum has been restricted to the Old World (Benarek-Ochyra 2000; Ochyra and Benarek-Ochyra 2004a). Nomenclature used in this species fact sheet follows the conspectus for the Racomitroideae proposed for use in the Bryophyte Flora of North America (Ochyra and Benarek-Ochyra 2004b). Technical Description: Plants trailing or to erect, 1-10 cm long, branched irregularly. Leaves green, yellow-green to blackish below, linear-lanceolate, straight or curved at shoot tips, imbricate when dry, 2- 4 mm long, 0.4-1 mm wide, tapered to a rounded, roughened tip; margins entire, recurved, lacking row of large thin-walled cells at base; costa forming prominent keel at back of leaf, extending nearly to leaf tip and never forming an awn; leaf cells multipapillose, the cell walls sinuose-wavy. Setae 4-8 mm long, twisted clockwise when dry. Capsules 2-3 mm long, cylindrical. Peristome teeth 0.6-0.8 mm long. Distinctive characters: (1) Leaf cells multipapillose, (2) leaves imbricate, strongly keeled and consistently awnless, (3) leaves bright green to yellow-green, (4) peristome 1 mm long, (5) moist shaded rock substrate. Similar species: Codriophorus varius (= Racomitrium varium) is very similar, but (1) usually at least some of its leaves have distinct awns, (2) its peristome teeth are an astonishing 1-1.7 mm long, forming a tepee-shaped cone that is frequently broken, and (3) its habitat on rocks, logs and soil is usually drier than that of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Grimmia (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Neotropics
    Grimmia (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Neotropics CLAUDIO DELGADILLO-MOYA Instituto de Biología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Grimmia fuscolutea Hook. Photo by Carmen Loyola. Grimmia (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Neotropics Claudio Delgadillo-Moya Diseño de portada y formación: Julio César Montero / D.G. Diana Martínez Diseño: D.G. Julio César Montero / D.G. Diana Martínez Fotografía de portada: Susana Guzmán Fotografía portadilla: Carmen Loyola Primera edición: 1 de octubre de 2015 D.R.©2015 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México, Distrito Federal www.unam.mx INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGÍA www.ib.unam.mx ISBN: 978-607-02-7185-4 Prohibida la reproducción total o parcial por cualquier medio sin la autorización escrita del titular de los derechos patrimoniales. Hecho en México Índice PREFACE . 4 INTRODUCTION . 6 MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY . 6 ECOLOGY . 8 DISTRIBUTION . 8 SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT . 9 1. Grimmia anodon Bruch & Schimp. 14 2. Grimmia atrata Miel. 16 3. Grimmia austrofunalis Müll. 19 4. Grimmia bicolor Herz. 22 5. Grimmia donniana Sm. 24 6. Grimmia elongata Kaulf. 26 7. Grimmia fuscolutea Hook. 29 8. Grimmia herzogii Broth. 32 9. Grimmia involucrata Card. 34 10. Grimmia laevigata (Brid.) Brid. 37 11. Grimmia lisae De Not. 38 12. Grimmia longirostris Hook. 42 13. Grimmia mexicana Greven. 48 14. Grimmia molesta Muñoz, Ann. 50 15. Grimmia montana Bruch & Schimp. 52 16. Grimmia moxleyi Williams, . 54 17. Grimmia navicularis Herz. 56 18. Grimmia ovalis (Hedw.) Lindb. 59 19. Grimmia pilifera P. Beauv. 62 20. Grimmia pseudoanodon Deguchi, Stud. 65 21. Grimmia pulla Card. 67 22. Grimmia pulvinata (Hedw.) Sm.
    [Show full text]
  • New National and Regional Bryophyte Records, 63
    Journal of Bryology ISSN: 0373-6687 (Print) 1743-2820 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjbr20 New national and regional bryophyte records, 63 L. T. Ellis, O. M. Afonina, I. V. Czernyadjeva, L. A. Konoreva, A. D. Potemkin, V. M. Kotkova, M. Alataş, H. H. Blom, M. Boiko, R. A. Cabral, S. Jimenez, D. Dagnino, C. Turcato, L. Minuto, P. Erzberger, T. Ezer, O. V. Galanina, N. Hodgetts, M. S. Ignatov, A. Ignatova, S. G. Kazanovsky, T. Kiebacher, H. Köckinger, E. O. Korolkova, J. Larraín, A. I. Maksimov, D. Maity, A. Martins, M. Sim-Sim, F. Monteiro, L. Catarino, R. Medina, M. Nobis, A. Nowak, R. Ochyra, I. Parnikoza, V. Ivanets, V. Plášek, M. Philippe, P. Saha, Md. N. Aziz, A. V. Shkurko, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. Uygur, K. Erkul, M. Wierzgoń & A. Graulich To cite this article: L. T. Ellis, O. M. Afonina, I. V. Czernyadjeva, L. A. Konoreva, A. D. Potemkin, V. M. Kotkova, M. Alataş, H. H. Blom, M. Boiko, R. A. Cabral, S. Jimenez, D. Dagnino, C. Turcato, L. Minuto, P. Erzberger, T. Ezer, O. V. Galanina, N. Hodgetts, M. S. Ignatov, A. Ignatova, S. G. Kazanovsky, T. Kiebacher, H. Köckinger, E. O. Korolkova, J. Larraín, A. I. Maksimov, D. Maity, A. Martins, M. Sim-Sim, F. Monteiro, L. Catarino, R. Medina, M. Nobis, A. Nowak, R. Ochyra, I. Parnikoza, V. Ivanets, V. Plášek, M. Philippe, P. Saha, Md. N. Aziz, A. V. Shkurko, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. Uygur, K. Erkul, M. Wierzgoń & A. Graulich (2020): New national and regional bryophyte records, 63, Journal of Bryology, DOI: 10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 Published online: 18 May 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Plant DNA in Adults of the Phytoplasma Vector Cacopsylla
    insects Article Identification of Plant DNA in Adults of the Phytoplasma Vector Cacopsylla picta Helps Understanding Its Feeding Behavior Dana Barthel 1,*, Hannes Schuler 2,3 , Jonas Galli 4, Luigimaria Borruso 2 , Jacob Geier 5, Katrin Heer 6 , Daniel Burckhardt 7 and Katrin Janik 1,* 1 Laimburg Research Centre, Laimburg 6, Pfatten (Vadena), IT-39040 Auer (Ora), Italy 2 Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, IT-39100 Bozen (Bolzano), Italy; [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (L.B.) 3 Competence Centre Plant Health, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, IT-39100 Bozen (Bolzano), Italy 4 Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, BOKU, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, A-1190 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 5 Department of Botany, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] 6 Faculty of Biology—Conservation Biology, Philipps Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8, D-35043 Marburg, Germany; [email protected] 7 Naturhistorisches Museum, Augustinergasse 2, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (K.J.) Received: 10 November 2020; Accepted: 24 November 2020; Published: 26 November 2020 Simple Summary: Cacopsylla picta is an insect vector of apple proliferation phytoplasma, the causative bacterial agent of apple proliferation disease. In this study, we provide an answer to the open question of whether adult Cacopsylla picta feed from other plants than their known host, the apple plant. We collected Cacopsylla picta specimens from apple trees and analyzed the composition of plant DNA ingested by these insects.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Sphagnum</I> Peat Mosses
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12547 Evolution of niche preference in Sphagnum peat mosses Matthew G. Johnson,1,2,3 Gustaf Granath,4,5,6 Teemu Tahvanainen, 7 Remy Pouliot,8 Hans K. Stenøien,9 Line Rochefort,8 Hakan˚ Rydin,4 and A. Jonathan Shaw1 1Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 2Current Address: Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, Illinois 60022 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvagen¨ 18D, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden 5School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 6Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden 7Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland 8Department of Plant Sciences and Northern Research Center (CEN), Laval University Quebec, Canada 9Department of Natural History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Museum, Trondheim, Norway Received March 26, 2014 Accepted September 23, 2014 Peat mosses (Sphagnum)areecosystemengineers—speciesinborealpeatlandssimultaneouslycreateandinhabitnarrowhabitat preferences along two microhabitat gradients: an ionic gradient and a hydrological hummock–hollow gradient. In this article, we demonstrate the connections between microhabitat preference and phylogeny in Sphagnum.Usingadatasetof39speciesof Sphagnum,withan18-locusDNAalignmentandanecologicaldatasetencompassingthreelargepublishedstudies,wetested
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Three East Antarctic Mosses
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2013 Phylogeny of Three East Antarctic Mosses Rhys A. Wyber University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Wyber, Rhys A., Phylogeny of Three East Antarctic Mosses, Bachelor of Medical Biotechnology Advanced - Honours thesis, , University of Wollongong, 2013. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4646 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong.
    [Show full text]
  • Grimmia-Pulvinata.Pdf
    Grimmiales Grimmia pulvinata Grey-cushioned Grimmia Key 110, 121 Arching seta 1 mm 2 mm G. pulvinata Identification This is the commonest British Grimmia, and forms round, almost furry, grey cushions about 1–2 cm tall. The narrow leaves are 3–4 mm long, nerved to the tip, with recurved margins. An important character is the leaf tip, which is abruptly contracted into a long hair point, which may be almost as long as the leaf blade. Oval capsules usually abound, bending back into the cushion on an arching seta (note, however, that when old and dry, the seta straightens and the capsule is held erect); the lid of the capsule has a long beak. In moist conditions, cushions appear dark green, the densely arranged leaves spread away from the stem and the hair points are only moderately conspicuous. When dry, the leaves fold together, with the result that the long, silvery hair points loosely entwine and are then particularly eye-catching. Similar species G. pulvinata most resembles G. orbicularis (Smith, p. 446), with which it sometimes grows, but G. orbicularis has a rounder capsule and a lid with a blunt, nipple-like tip (see photograph on opposite page). G. orbicularis grows on limestone (particularly Carboniferous) rocks and boulders in the lowlands, often in sunny, exposed places. Less often, it grows on the mortar of old walls. It is somewhat susceptible to pollution, and much less frequent than G. pulvinata. G. trichophylla (p. 529) forms less neat cushions on acidic rocks, has leaves that taper gradually to the tip, and rarely produces capsules.
    [Show full text]
  • New National and Regional Bryophyte Records, 59
    Journal of Bryology ISSN: 0373-6687 (Print) 1743-2820 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjbr20 New national and regional bryophyte records, 59 L. T. Ellis, L. A. Amélio, D. F. Peralta, M. Bačkor, E. Z. Baisheva, H. Bednarek- Ochyra, M. Burghardt, I. V. Czernyadjeva, S. S. Kholod, A. D. Potemkin, A. Erdağ, M. Kırmacı, V. E. Fedosov, M. S. Ignatov, D. E. Koltysheva, J. R. Flores, E. Fuertes, M. Goga, S.-L. Guo, W. K. Hofbauer, M. Kurzthaler, H. Kürschner, O. I. Kuznetsova, M. Lebouvier, D. G. Long, Yu. S. Mamontov, K. M. Manjula, C. N. Manju, B. Mufeed, F. Müller, M. C. Nair, M. Nobis, N. Norhazrina, M. Aisyah, G. E. Lee, M. Philippe, D. A. Philippov, V. Plášek, Z. Komínková, R. D. Porley, Yu. A. Rebriev, M. S. Sabovljević, A. M. de Souza, E. B. Valente, D. Spitale, P. Srivastava, V. Sahu, A. K. Asthana, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. A. Vilnet, K.-Y. Yao & J.-Ch. Zhao To cite this article: L. T. Ellis, L. A. Amélio, D. F. Peralta, M. Bačkor, E. Z. Baisheva, H. Bednarek- Ochyra, M. Burghardt, I. V. Czernyadjeva, S. S. Kholod, A. D. Potemkin, A. Erdağ, M. Kırmacı, V. E. Fedosov, M. S. Ignatov, D. E. Koltysheva, J. R. Flores, E. Fuertes, M. Goga, S.-L. Guo, W. K. Hofbauer, M. Kurzthaler, H. Kürschner, O. I. Kuznetsova, M. Lebouvier, D. G. Long, Yu. S. Mamontov, K. M. Manjula, C. N. Manju, B. Mufeed, F. Müller, M. C. Nair, M. Nobis, N. Norhazrina, M. Aisyah, G. E. Lee, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Palynology of Amphidiumschimp.(Amphidiaceae
    Acta Botanica Brasilica - 33(1): 135-140. Jan-Mar 2019. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0328 Palynology of Amphidium Schimp. (Amphidiaceae M. Stech): can spore morphology circumscribe the genus? Marcella de Almeida Passarella1* and Andrea Pereira Luizi-Ponzo2 Received: September 26, 2018 Accepted: January 7, 2019 . ABSTRACT Amphidium Schimp. is characterized by cushion-forming erect primary stems, linear-lanceolate leaves, and gymnostome capsules. The phylogenetic position ofAmphidium is uncertain, with the genus having been variously included in Zygodontaceae Schimp., Rhabdoweisiaceae Limpr., Orthotrichaceae Arn. and Amphidiaceae M. Stech. A palynological investigation was performed of the three species of the genus that occur in the Americas: Amphidium lapponicum (Hedw.) Schimp., Amphidium mougeotii (Bruch & Schimp.) Schimp., and Amphidium tortuosum (Hornsch.) Cufod. Spores were observed and measured for greatest diameter under light microscopy both before and after acetolysis. Non-acetolyzed spores were observed under scanning electron microscopy to assess surface ornamentation of the sporoderm. All spores observed were smaller than 20 µm and heteropolar, with surface ornamentation reflecting a combination of different elements, such as gemmae, rugulae and perforations. The palynological characteristics observed here suggest that the genus Amphidium, and thus its contained species, be placed in their own family. Keywords: Amphidiaceae, bryophytes, haplolepidous moss, palynology, spores circumscription. Brotherus (1924) included Amphidium
    [Show full text]
  • Grimmiaceae Subfam. Racomitrioideae (Bryophyta) in Hungary
    Polish Botanical Journal 61(1): 23–51, 2016 DOI: 10.1515/pbj-2016-0015 GRIMMIACEAE SUBFAM. RACOMITRIOIDEAE (BRYOPHYTA) IN HUNGARY Peter Erzberger, Halina Bednarek-Ochyra & Ryszard Ochyra Abstract. The subfamily Racomitrioideae of the Grimmiaceae is represented in Hungary by seven species belonging to four genera, including Bucklandiella affinis (F. Weber & D. Mohr) Bednarek-Ochyra & Ochyra, B. heterosticha (Hedw.) Bednarek- Ochyra & Ochyra, B. microcarpa (Hedw.) Bednarek-Ochyra & Ochyra, Codriophorus aciculare (Hedw.) P. Beauv., C. aquaticus (Brid.) Brid., Racomitrium lanuginosum (Hedw.) Brid. and Niphotrichum canescens (Hedw.) Bednarek-Ochyra & Ochyra. All species are briefly described and illustrated and their distribution in Hungary is mapped. A key for determination of genera and species is provided. Some ecological, bryogeographical and conservation questions related to particular species are discussed. The following new statuses and combinations are proposed: Codriophorus P. Beauv. sect. Hydrophilus (Bednarek-Ochyra) Bednarek- Ochyra & Ochyra, stat. et comb. nov., Codriophorus sect. Depressi (Bednarek-Ochyra) Bednarek-Ochyra & Ochyra, stat. et comb. nov., and Codriophorus sect. Andicola (Bednarek-Ochyra) Bednarek-Ochyra & Ochyra, stat. et comb. nov. Key words. Bucklandiella, Codriophorus, distribution, Niphotrichum, nomenclature, Racomitrium, taxonomy Peter Erzberger, Belziger Str. 37, D-10823 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Halina Bednarek-Ochyra & Ryszard Ochyra, Laboratory of Bryology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] and [email protected] Introduction This is the third and last paper in a series of publi- Although the Grimmiaceae exhibit remarkable cations dealing with the moss family Grimmiaceae variation and diversity of gametophyte and sporo- in Hungary (Erzberger & Schröder 2008; Erzberger phyte characters, the family as a whole is a dis- 2009a).
    [Show full text]