Michael James Bowes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Michael James Bowes An analysis of the private water provision in Great Britain. By Michael James Bowes Of Cornell University Law School Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Law (JSD) (January 2014) (i) Copyright © 2014 Michael James Bowes All Rights Reserved (ii) Abstract Michael James Bowes (JSD) Cornell University 2014 An analysis of the private water provision in Great Britain. In 1989 England and Wales transferred their public provision of water to the private sector. This was the largest public to private water transfer ever to have happened in the Western World. The main objective of this study is to determine if there has been a positive or negative impact on provision due to this privatisation and whether this provision can be called effective. In order to ascertain the effective nature of the provision and to determine whether there has been an improvement or deterioration, six key performance criteria have been devised from the most critical areas in the provision of water. Various forms of information were gathered which include statistics from regulators, corporate providers and secondary sources. In addition a series of elite interviews were carried out which included a variety of stakeholders including; corporate providers, quasi- autonomous non-regulatory organisations, charities and consumer bodies. This study shows that although the systems in England and Wales have areas which need to be improved, all six of the key performance criteria have improved since privatisation and that the current system of private provision is effective. Biographical Sketch Michael James Bowes is a qualified solicitor in both Scotland and England. He obtained his initial law degree (LLB with honours) in 2004 from Glasgow University and completed half of his honours grades at the National University of Singapore. Following this he obtained Diplomas in both Scots and English Law from the Glasgow Graduate School of Law and Nottingham Law School. He also passed his English Transfer Examinations allowing him to practice in England. Professionally he practised law in a large commercial firm for two years to qualify as a solicitor, subsequently he taught commercial law at Glasgow University for a year. After teaching, he has worked for a variety of institutions ranging from the United Nations, Hedge funds and the Council of Europe. At Cornell University he obtained a (LLM) Master of Laws degree in (2009) and following enrolled for a Doctorate in Law (JSD), which is the purpose of this submission. (iii) Dedication Dedicated to My Parents Mr Jim and Mrs Katrina Bowes. Their support has been only been exceeded by their love. My Father is my best friend and my Mother is my hero. And My dear Grandmother Mrs M Scott. Her joy for life is shown in the happiness of those she loves. “Every day I wake up and try to make someone happy!” (iv) Acknowledgements Many thanks to my Chairman and Committee for their support: Professor Gregory S Alexander Professor Eduardo M Peñalver (Chairman) Professor Keith Porter Professor Laura Underkuffler I would like to thank the many who contributed to the invaluable interview process of the Thesis. I would also like to thank: Professor Jim Murdoch who has been a constant academic mentor and friend, Dean Charles Cramton for his support, Dr David Benson for his guidance on methodology, Miss Victoria McNicol for her administrative skills and Mrs Mary-Jane porter for her cooking. (v) An analysis of the private water provision in Great Britain. Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introductory Chapter – Water The Most Important Compound Part 1 Importance of the Topic Research Claims and Objectives Global Problem with the Provision of Drinking Water Part 2 Private Sector Provision Part 3 Chapter Components and Objectives (vi) Chapter 2 Current Literature and Methodology Part 1 Current Literature Part 2 Methodology Chapter 3 The Transformation to Privatisation Chapter 4 Scotland Chapter 5 Legislation and Governance (vii) Chapter 6 England and Wales Part 1 The Regulators Part 2 England Part 3 Wales Chapter 7 Sustainability Part 1 Catchment Management and Sustainable Development Part 2 Ofwat and Sustainable Development Needed Improvements (viii) Chapter 8 Global and National Problems and the Future of Water Part 1 Recent water problems in Great Britain Part 2 Future Global Concerns Part 3 Elements which have aided effective provision Concluding Remarks (viii) APPENDIX Appendix 1 Industry Interviews Appendix 2 Global Water Statistics Appendix 3 The Hydrological Cycle Appendix 4 Water Statistics for the United Kingdom Appendix 5 The Factors Behind Water Scarcity Appendix 6 Bottled Water Appendix 7 Water Companies’ Information Appendix 8 Water Companies Corporate Web-pages (xi) Appendix 9 Countries with Ownership Interest not in The UK Appendix 10 Water Companies Share Prices Appendix 11 Water Companies Revenue and Profit Appendix 12 Private Purchase Example Appendix 13 Staff Employed and Contracted Appendix 14 Fieldwork (RELU) 2010 Appendix 15 Fieldwork (Crete) 2010 Appendix 16 Fieldwork (Wetlands) 2009 /2010 REFERENCES Reference List (x) List of Tables Table 1 Example Costs of Domestic Water Table 2 Virtual Water Content of Consumer Goods Table 3 The Privatisation Timeline Table 4 Charges of Water and Waste Services by Scottish Water 2012-2013 Table 5 2008 Water Test Findings of Rivers and Lochs Table 6 Rights and Responsibilities of Water Ownership and Use Table 7 Average Household Bills 2012/13 – Water and Sewage Providers (xi) List of Abbreviations EA / The Environment Agency The British Government Agency concerned with pollution and flooding. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/ CCW / The Consumer Council for Water This body represents the interests of consumers in England and Wales and deals with complaints against water providers. http://www.ccwater.org.uk/ DEFRA / The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs The British Government department concerned with environmental protection. http://www.DEFRA.gov.uk/ DWI / The Drinking Water Inspectorate This regulatory body monitors the quality of drinking water provided by the water companies in England and Wales/ (xii) DWQR / The Drinking Water Quality Regulator for Scotland This regulatory body monitors the quality of drinking water provided in Scotland/ http://www.dwqr.org.uk/ NAWC / National Association of Water Companies (USA) This is an association of private water and sewage providers in the United States of America. NGO / Non Governmental organisation Ofwat / The Water Services Regulation Authority This is the regulator who monitors price in England and Wales. http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/ Quango / Quasi Autonomous Non-Governmental Organisation RELU / The Rural Economy and Land Use Programme This is an academic programme which is focused on the rural economy. http://www.relu.ac.uk/ UN / The United Nations WICS / The Water Industry Commission for Scotland This is the regulator who sets the price for water customers in Scotland. http://www.watercommission.co.uk/ (xiii) Chapter 1 Introductory Chapter – Water The Most Important Compound Introduction Our Planet is consumed and comprised mostly of water, over two thirds is comprised by liquid water in the seas, over one twentieth is composed of ice and the majority of most living things are comprised primarily of water. As Ball states, “We call our home Earth, but Water would be more apt.”1 Water is a unique and irreplaceable resource, which is necessary for life. The adequate provision of water is of paramount importance in any country. Provision comes in many forms, one of which is by private corporations as in England and Wales. The basic claim of the Thesis is that water provision in England and Wales has improved since the transfer from public to private ownership and that the current private provision can be deemed to be effective. It is the principle focus of this study to scrutinise private provision and in particular the private 1 Ball P “Life’s Matrix. A Biography of Water ” University of California Press, 2001 1 provision in England and Wales, to ascertain if there is effective provision in these countries and to determine whether privatisation has had a positive or detrimental impact to this provision. The island of Great Britain is unique in that it has three systems of provision under one head of state (Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II) in one kingdom, two of those systems are different forms of private provision and England is unique in that it was the western world’s largest ever water transfer from public to private provision. In addition the author being British was able to access and interview elite individuals connected with the provision and regulation of water. These combined factors has allowed a work to be produced which gains completely new knowledge into a unique sector of a topic which is globally important. Part 1 of this chapter begins with highlighting the global problem and international concerns surrounding the adequate provision of drinking water. The importance of the topic is then further illustrated both by discussing water as necessary and irreplaceable to humanity, as a legal human right and also as a commercial product. Part 2 of this chapter introduces private sector provision to the reader, different forms of privatisation are then discussed including the systems in England and Wales. Part 3 highlights the main areas of discussion and their objectives in all of the chapters of the text. 2 Research Claim and Objectives The principle claim behind the work is that since privatisation water provision has improved in England and Wales and that the service being provided can be called effective. In order to establish this claim certain objectives have been accomplished and are listed below: This Thesis will evaluate water provision in Great Britain, with particular focus given to the system of private provision in England and Wales. The Thesis will first determine to what extent water as a resource and its method of provision is an important area for discussion.
Recommended publications
  • Celebrities As Political Representatives: Explaining the Exchangeability of Celebrity Capital in the Political Field
    Celebrities as Political Representatives: Explaining the Exchangeability of Celebrity Capital in the Political Field Ellen Watts Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics 2018 Declaration I, Ellen Watts, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Ellen Watts September 17, 2018. 2 Abstract The ability of celebrities to become influential political actors is evident (Marsh et al., 2010; Street 2004; 2012, West and Orman, 2003; Wheeler, 2013); the process enabling this is not. While Driessens’ (2013) concept of celebrity capital provides a starting point, it remains unclear how celebrity capital is exchanged for political capital. Returning to Street’s (2004) argument that celebrities claim to speak for others provides an opportunity to address this. In this thesis I argue successful exchange is contingent on acceptance of such claims, and contribute an original model for understanding this process. I explore the implicit interconnections between Saward’s (2010) theory of representative claims, and Bourdieu’s (1991) work on political capital and the political field. On this basis, I argue celebrity capital has greater explanatory power in political contexts when fused with Saward’s theory of representative claims. Three qualitative case studies provide demonstrations of this process at work. Contributing to work on how celebrities are evaluated within political and cultural hierarchies (Inthorn and Street, 2011; Marshall, 2014; Mendick et al., 2018; Ribke, 2015; Skeggs and Wood, 2011), I ask which key factors influence this process.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes a to J
    PCR Annexes A-C Submarine Dismantling Project (SDP) Post-Consultation Report on the Site for Interim Storage of Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste Annexes A to J July 2015 Contents A Consultation Press Release B Consultation Document Map C Exhibition Adverts D Local Workshop Reports E National Workshop Reports F Submissions from Organisations and Elected Representatives G Feedback Forms H Emails and Letters I Advisory Subgroup Reports J Statistical Breakdown Annex A: ISS Consultation Press Release PRESS RELEASE 134/2014 16 October 2014 MoD confirms sites for submarine dismantling consultations Five UK nuclear facilities have been confirmed as potential sites to store waste from decommissioned nuclear-powered submarines. A public consultation process will now help to determine which site is selected. The sites, which already hold radioactive materials, are either owned by MOD, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) or industry. They are: • the Atomic Weapons Establishment sites at Aldermaston and Burghfield in Berkshire which are owned by MOD and run by AWE plc; • Sellafield in west Cumbria, owned by the NDA; • Chapelcross in Dumfriesshire, owned by the NDA; • Capenhurst in Cheshire, which is run by Capenhurst Nuclear Services. Philip Dunne MP, Minister for Defence Equipment, Support and Technology: “When the submarines in the Royal Navy fleet reach the end of their lives we need to dispose of them in a way that is safe, secure and environmentally sound. “This open and transparent public consultation process provides the opportunity to work closely with local communities near to potential sites to listen carefully to their views with the aim of delivering a solution that achieves these objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Boris Johnson
    DEC-01/08 REPORT OF AN INVESTIGATION BORIS JOHNSON MAYOR OF LONDON CHAIRMAN, METROPOLITAN POLICE AUTHORITY BY JONATHAN GOOLDEN, BA(LAW) SOLICITOR 24th February 2009 SCHEDULE OF EVIDENCE jonathan goolden SOLICITORS PO Box 117 Louth LN11 0WW Tel 0845 370 3117 Fax 0845 370 3118 [email protected] www.goolden.co.uk regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority 1 This page is intentionally blank 2 Schedule of evidence Page Number Description 5 JTG 1 Letter dated 5th December 2008 from Len Duvall to Fiona Ledden, GLA – complaints against Boris Johnson 8 JTG 2 Biography of Boris Johnson 9 JTG 3 Home Secretary’s statement to the House of Commons on Home Office leaks 28 JTG 4 Times article – 29th November 2008 29 JTG 5 Transcript of London Assembly Plenary – 3rd December 2008 47 JTG 6 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee press announcement of inquiry into policing process of Home Office leak inquiries – 11th December 2008 48 JTG 7 Home Affairs Committee – uncorrected transcript of oral evidence – Rt. Hon. Jacqui Smith MP and Sir David Normington – 20th January 2009 75 JTG 8 Home Affairs Committee – uncorrected transcript of oral evidence – Mr. Boris Johnson – 3rd February 2009 88 JTG 9 Home Affairs Committee – uncorrected transcript of oral evidence – AC Robert Quick – 10th February 2009 120 JTG 10 Statement of Len Duvall – 11th February 2009 3 123 JTG 11 Statement of Catherine Crawford – 13th February 2009 127 JTG 12 First Statement of Guto Harri – 10th February 2009 135 JTG 13 Statement of Sir Paul Stephenson – received 19th February 2009
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament
    Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament Annual Report 2016–2017 Chair: The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament Annual Report 2016–2017 Chair: The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP Presented to Parliament pursuant to sections 2 and 3 of the Justice and Security Act 2013 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20 December 2017 HC 655 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at isc.independent.gov.uk Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us via our webform at isc.independent.gov.uk/contact ISBN 978-1-5286-0168-9 CCS1217631642 12/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office THE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE OF PARLIAMENT This Report reflects the work of the previous Committee,1 which sat from September 2015 to May 2017: The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP (Chair) The Rt. Hon. Richard Benyon MP The Most Hon. the Marquess of Lothian QC PC (from 21 October 2016) The Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Duncan KCMG MP The Rt. Hon. Fiona Mactaggart MP (until 17 July 2016) The Rt. Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of UK Political Leadership on the Environment Since the 2010
    A review of UK political leadership on the environment since the 2010 general election GREEN STANDARD 2013 Green Standard 2013 © Green Alliance 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- A review of UK political leadership on the Noncommercial-No derivative works environment since the 2010 general election 3.0 unported licence. This does not replace copyright but gives certain by: rights without having to ask Green Alliance for permission. Campaign for Better Transport, Friends of the Under this licence, this work may Earth, Greenpeace, Green Alliance, RSPB, The be shared freely. It provides the Wildlife Trusts and WWF. freedom to copy, distribute and transmit this work on to others, provided text is unaltered. This work Acknowledgements must not be resold or used for Thanks to the following individuals for their input: commercial purposes. These Richard Benwell, Ruth Davis, Penny Evans, conditions can be waived under certain circumstances with the written Andrew Farmer, Joss Garman, Owen Gibbons, permission of Green Alliance. For Alastair Harper, Richard Hebditch, Stephen more information about this licence Hinchley, Donna Hume, Liz Hutchins, Harry go to http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Huyton, Elaine King, Hannah Kyrke-Smith, Gareth Morgan, Doug Parr, Andrew Pendleton, Hazel Phillips, Ellie Robinson, George Smeeton, Ben Stafford and Matt Trimmer. Published by Green Alliance September 2013 ISBN 978-1-905869-96-1 Green Alliance 36 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 0RE T 020 7233 7433 [email protected] www.green-alliance.org.uk blog: greenallianceblog.org.uk twitter: @GreenAllianceUK The Green Alliance Trust Registered charity no.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Policy and the Internet:Charity 5/2/08 15:39 Page 1
    Politics, policy and the internet:Charity 5/2/08 15:39 Page 1 CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES “In January 2007, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama launched their bids for the most powerful position in the world. But there was no bunting or cheering crowds. Instead, both candidates for the US Presidency made their announcements in a manner inconceivable just a few years ago: they released videos on their websites.” Politics, Policy and Television and radio transformed the way politics operated in the twentieth century. And, predicts the Internet Robert Colvile, the internet could do the same in the twenty-first. Yet the main British political parties are failing to exploit its potential. The BNP website has the ROBERT COLVILE same market share as all of the other major political parties combined. The internet will bring a far greater openness to politics, helping the activist and the citizen hold politicians to account. The web could also re-empower MPs, by linking them far more directly to the concerns of their constituents. And for policy development, the internet will revolutionise the way policy-making works. The most subtle, but perhaps most powerful, change, may be to the public’s mindset. As we grow used to the instant availability of information online, we will no longer tolerate delay and obfuscation in getting similar information from government. The individual, and not the state, will be the master in the digital age. Price: £5.00 Politics, Policy and the Internet ROBERT COLVILE CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES 57 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QL 2008 THE AUTHOR ROBERT COLVILE is a features editor and leader writer at The Daily Telegraph, where he also writes extensively about technology.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee Brexit: Fisheries Written and Oral Evidence Contents
    EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee Brexit: Fisheries Written and Oral Evidence Contents Angling Trust — Written Evidence (FBR0013) .................................................................................... 3 Thomas Appleby — Written Evidence (FBR0012) ............................................................................. 9 Bertie Armstrong, Marcus Coleman, Hazel Curtis and Barrie Deas — Oral Evidence (QQ 12 – 21) ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 John Ashworth — Written Evidence (FBR0004).............................................................................. 43 Professor Richard Barnes, Professor Robin Churchill and Dr Bryce Stewart — Oral Evidence (QQ 1 – 11) .............................................................................................................................................. 44 Professor Robin Churchill, Professor Richard Barnes and Dr Bryce Stewart — Oral Evidence (QQ 1 – 11) .............................................................................................................................................. 64 Marcus Coleman, Bertie Armstrong, Hazel Curtis and Barrie Deas — Oral Evidence (QQ 12 – 21) ............................................................................................................................................................ 65 Hazel Curtis, Bertie Armstrong, Marcus Coleman, and Barrie Deas — Oral Evidence (QQ 12 – 21)
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Belt 2.0 British Global Leadership in Ocean Conservation 2017-2022 Richard Benyon Mp
    BLUE BELT 2.0 BRITISH GLOBAL LEADERSHIP IN OCEAN CONSERVATION 2017-2022 RICHARD BENYON MP OCTOBER 2017 1 | BRITISH GLOBAL LEADERSHIP IN OCEAN CONSERVATION 2 | BRITISH GLOBAL LEADERSHIP IN OCEAN CONSERVATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY IS BEGINNING TO WAKE UP TO THE FACT THAT THE WORLD’S OCEANS ARE IN CRISIS. In June 2017 the United Nations hosted its first Ocean Conference in a bid to create a similar international cooperative effort as we have seen to tackle climate change. Just as the United Kingdom has shown global leadership in climate policy so can we, in partnership with our Overseas Territories, lead on ocean conservation. We have made remarkable progress over the past six years, committing nearly four million square kilometres of British waters to a ‘Blue Belt’ of protection by 2020. The UK must now support implementation of these Blue Belt commitments in full and, as we leave the European Union, take the opportunity as Global Britain to lead the world in ocean conservation through the following actions: JUST AS THE Support ambitious implementation of the Blue Belt in our UK Overseas Territories (UKOTs), with specific focus on the South Sandwich Islands, Saint UNITED KINGDOM Helena, Ascension Island and Tristan da Cunha. HAS SHOWN GLOBAL The Government has already committed £4.8 million of funding per year from 2016 LEADERSHIP IN to 2020 to the Blue Belt. This funding must be maintained and extended up to the end of this parliament in 2022 if Britain is to continue in its position as a global leader CLIMATE POLICY in ocean conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2018 Annual Statement
    The 2018 Annual Statement Human Rights in Northern Ireland 2018 Human Rights in Northern Ireland 2018 The 2018 Annual Statement 2018 The The 2018 Annual Statement Human Rights in Northern Ireland 1 2018 Human Rights in Northern Ireland 2018 About us The NI Human Rights Commission (the Commission) protects and promotes the human rights of everyone in NI. We do this by: • keeping under review the adequacy and effectiveness in NI of law and practice relating to the protection of human rights; • advising the Secretary of State for NI and the Executive Committee of The 2018 Annual Statement 2018 The the NI Assembly of legislative and other measures which ought to be taken to protect human rights; • advising the NI Assembly whether proposed legislation is compatible with human rights standards; • promoting understanding and awareness of the importance of human rights in NI, for example, by undertaking or commissioning or otherwise assisting research and educational activities. In addition, the Commission has powers to: • give assistance to individuals who apply to it for help in relation to proceedings involving law or practice concerning the protection of human rights; • bring proceedings involving law or practice concerning the protection of human rights; • institute, or intervene in, legal proceedings concerning human rights where it need not be a victim or potential victim of the unlawful act to which the proceedings relate; • conduct investigations; • require a person to provide information and documents in their possession, and to give oral evidence, in respect of an investigation; • enter a specified place of detention in NI, in respect of an investigation, and; • publish its advice and the outcome of its research and investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 573 6 January 2014 No. 98 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 6 January 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON.DAVID CAMERON,MP,MAY 2010) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. David Cameron, MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt Hon. Nick Clegg, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. William Hague, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. George Osborne, MP CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE TREASURY—The Rt Hon. Danny Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS—The Rt Hon. Vince Cable, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Iain Duncan Smith, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. Chris Grayling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Michael Gove, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt Hon. Eric Pickles, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH—The Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. Owen Paterson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Justine Greening MP
    Centre Write Autumn 2017 Conservatism refresh The Rt Hon Justine Greening MP | Jacob Rees-Mogg MP | The Rt Hon Ken Clarke MP | Sir Craig Oliver SAVE THE CHILDREN Hyams the Children/Jonathan Save Photo: ANNUAL RECEPTION Speakers include: Co-hosted by The Rt Hon Priti Patel MP Secretary of State for International Development ConservativeHome The Rt Hon Stephen Crabb MP Tuesday 3 October Paul Goodman 9.30pm – 11pm Editor, ConservativeHome Charter 4 Kevin Watkins Chief Executive, Save the Children Manchester Central Refreshments will be provided, wheelchair accessible RSVP to: [email protected] Registered charity England and Wales (213890) Scotland (SC039570) Party Conference Flyer 148x210_v4.indd 2 18/09/2017 12:27 CONTENS 3 Contents EDITORIAL Brexit together Editor’s letter Syed Kamall MEP 12 Laura Round 5 Director’s note SUCCESSFUL CONSERVATISM Ryan Shorthouse 6 Her secret... Letters to the editor 7 Lord Willetts 16 Beware Corbyn CONSERVATISM AT A CROSSROADS Kate Maltby 18 Contents for conservatism End of the insurgency? Julian Glover 8 Douglas Carswell 19 Time for more state? Dialogue with Lord Finkelstein, Nicky Sam Bowman and David Skelton 10 Morgan, Jacob Rees-Mogg & Craig Oliver 20 Page 8 Julian Glover Page 34 The Rt explores what’s next Hon Ken Clarke Bright Blue is an independent for conservatism MP reflects on his think tank and pressure group time in parliament for liberal conservatism. Director: Ryan Shorthouse Page 28 The Centre Write Chair: Matthew d’Ancona interview: The Rt Hon Board of Directors: Rachel
    [Show full text]