DOCSLIB.ORG

The Israel-Lebanon War of 2006 and the Failure of US Foreign Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Israel-Lebanon War of 2006 and the Failure of US Foreign Policy Journal of Politics and Law; Vol. 8, No. 1; 2015 ISSN 1913-9047 E-ISSN 1913-9055 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Israel-Lebanon War of 2006 and the Failure of US Foreign Policy Hamed Mousavi1 1 Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada Correspondence: Hamed Mousavi, Room B640, Loeb Building, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel by Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 19, 2015 Accepted: February 5, 2015 Online Published: February 27, 2015 doi:10.5539/jpl.v8n1p130 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v8n1p130 Abstract This paper argues that the US encouraged the starting, continuation and even expansion of the 2006 Israeli war on Lebanon in order to achieve its own hegemonic objectives in the region. While global hegemony has always been on Washington’s agenda, in the Bush administration, with neoconservatives sitting behind influential desks in the capital, the initiative got new impetus. According to this new approach, the goal was to be advanced with the confrontation and eventual defeat of the Iran-Syria-Hezbollah-Hamas axis, a move that would help create a ‘New Middle East’ in which opposition to US-Israeli policies would not be tolerated. The paper uses a Neoclassical Realist theoretical approach to show that Washington’s miscalculation of power relations in the region led to the failure of its foreign policy. Like the Iraq War of 2003, the 2006 Lebanon War was a disaster for the US. With the encouragement and support of the Americans, the Israeli war machine fought an inconclusive war with Hezbollah, as a result of which the status of the Israeli military as the Middle East’s ‘Invincible Army’ was shattered and archenemies Hezbollah and Iran were strengthened. Keywords: 2006 Lebanon War, US foreign policy, neoclassical realism, Middle East politics, Israeli-Arab conflict, US-Israel relations 1. Introduction On July 12th 2006 Hezbollah forces in a cross border attack on two Israeli armored Humvees killed three soldiers and took two soldiers prisoner. In retaliation Israel started a massive assault on Lebanon. What ensued was an open war between Israel and Hezbollah that lasted for 33 days, left over 1100 Lebanese and 43 Israelis killed and caused major destruction to Lebanese infrastructure with minimum estimates standing at 3.6 billion dollars. There are however estimates as high as 15 billion dollars on the destruction on Lebanese economy according to the UN development program (Zafiris & Sayed, 2008). Israel’s aim was to cause massive destruction to Lebanon, or to put it in the words of Israel’s Chief of Staff, Dan Halutz, “turn Lebanon's clock back 20 years" (Avnery, 2007). The aim of this policy was to turn the Lebanese population against Hezbollah. Initially there was wide spread speculation of pre-planning by Israel for the summer 2006 war, with the San Francisco Chronicle stating that Army officers had started giving power point presentations on a “three week assault” on Lebanon, with very similar details to the conflict in question, to the US administration and think thanks, almost a year in advance of July 2006 (Kalman, 2006). Speculation turned into fact when in a leaked testimony to the Winograd commission, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert confessed to have started planning for the conflict at least 4 months in advance. According to the leading Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, which obtained the leaked testimony, Olmert discussed the possibility of war in January 2006 and asked to see military plans in March of the same year (Urquhart, 2007). In the years prior to the 2006 conflict some elements of the Bush administration especially in the State department had advised restraint on Israeli assaults on the occupied Palestinian territories mainly due to the fact that the US was fighting a war in Iraq and was working to “win the hearts and minds” of the Iraqis. The state department and more sensible elements within the administration were strongly against any joint Israeli-US military efforts mainly due to the fact that the State Department correctly believed that this would make the ‘War on Terror’ look like a US-Israeli war on Muslim countries. However when the time came America’s actual policy was much more in tune with the views of hawkish neoconservatives who were occupying key positions in Washington. This article will try to address how and why the US administration encouraged the starting, continuation and even expansion of the 2006 Israeli war on Lebanon using a neoclassical realist theoretical 130 www.ccsenet.org/jpl Journal of Politics and Law Vol. 8, No. 1; 2015 framework. 2. Theoretical Framework In the Theory of International Politics, Kenneth Waltz (1979) lays the foundation of Neorealist IR theory by isolating structural variables and ignoring state level variables. The theory’s main assumption is that unlike domestic politics, the state of international affairs is one of anarchy. His theory also takes states as the main actors of this arena and assumes that they rely on self-help to ensure their survival. All these are core realist assumptions and are shared by scholars such as Carr, Morgenthau, Mearsheimer and even classical writers such as Machiavelli, Hobbes and Thucydides. However what makes Waltz’s theory unique is that by distinguishing between structure and process he is able to build a theory that is both parsimonious and powerful. His theory is based on the assumption that the position of units in the system is not a property of the units themselves but rather a property of the system and thus by studying the system one can find regularities in state behavior. Another logical conclusion to this assumption is that the structure only changes when the arrangement of its parts changes and not by any change in process level variables. Thus by isolating the third image from the first and second images, Waltz aims to explain the constraints imposed on the units by the structure. Therefore the third image is influencing and affecting the first two images, not the other way round. A well-devised structural theory will explain how states with vastly different unit level variables will behave similarly due to the impositions of the structure (Waltz, 1979, pp. 79-101). Nevertheless while neorealism provides important improvements over past realist approaches, it has been criticized for completely ignoring domestic level factors such as the ideological orientations of decision makers. This weakness of Waltz’s theory is caused by its assumption that all states are homogeneous units of the international system (Rosecrance, 1981, pp. 700-708). To address these weaknesses neoclassical realism brings unit level factors into the analysis, while at the same time accepting many of neorealism’s assumptions. Neoclassical realists assert that a state’s foreign policy is driven primarily by its place in the international system and its relative material capabilities. This is a major area of commonality with neorealist theory. Where it differs from structural theory is that it argues that a state’s relative power in the system is not directly translated into foreign policy. Rather its impact is dependent on unit level “intervening variables” which act in between the independent (relative power capabilities) and dependent (foreign policy) variables. Neoclassical realists for example stress that the perception of decision makers and domestic state structures are key to how states view the international system and how they define their country’s interests. By accounting for intervening variables that ‘translate’ the independent variable, realist theory becomes more complex but at the same time results in greater accuracy and specificity (Rose, 1998, pp. 166-167). Neoclassical Realism also differs from constructivism in that the main driver of a state’s foreign policy is its relative power capabilities and the other factors pointed earlier only act as intervening variables, whereas constructivism sees norms as constituting the very identity and interests of states. Also there are objective structural constraints and incentives on state behavior in neoclassical realism and as a result anarchy is not what states make of it. As future sections will demonstrate neoclassical realism can be successfully used to analyze how the ideology of decision makers can affect American policy in the Middle East in negative ways. 3. Encouragement Beyond the Usual Endorsement From the start of the 2006 Lebanon War it was evident that the Bush administration strongly supported Israel’s war with its northern neighbor. This support came through in terms of both public statements and more importantly via actions on the ground. A day after the war started President Bush repeated the right of Israel to “defend” itself, which is usually used by Washington whenever Israel attacks its opponents with disproportional force. The American President also called Hezbollah “the root of the problem” (CTV News, 2006). The US Congress tried not to fall behind the executive branch in supporting Israel by passing Senate resolution 534 with a 98-0 vote, "Condemning Hezbollah and Hamas and their state sponsors and supporting Israel's exercise of its right to self-defense" (United Sates Senate, 2006, p. Res.534), and the house passing resolution 921 with a 410-8 vote, with such an exaggerated tone that is hard to find even in Israel. On the ground according to the New York Times, Washington expedited the delivery of satellite and laser guided bombs to Israel (Reuters, US rushes precision-guided bombs to Israel: paper, 2006). Also on July 14th just two days after the start of the conflict the US Congress was notified of a very large JP-8 jet fuel shipment to Israel amounting to 210 million dollars so that “the jet fuel will be consumed while the aircraft is in use to keep peace and security in the region” (Defense Security Cooperation Agency, 2006), or to put it in other terms it was needed for the Israeli Air Force more than 12,000 combat missions in the 33 war.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rediscovering the Arab Dimension of Middle East Regional Politics
    Review of International Studies page 1 of 22 2011 British International Studies Association doi:10.1017/S0260210511000283 The New Arab Cold War: rediscovering the Arab dimension of Middle East regional politics MORTEN VALBJØRN AND ANDRÉ BANK* Abstract. This article provides a conceptual lens for and a thick interpretation of the emergent regional constellation in the Middle East in the first decade of the 21st century. It starts out by challenging two prevalent claims about regional politics in the context of the 2006 Lebanon and 2008–09 Gaza Wars: Firstly, that regional politics is marked by a fundamental break from the ‘old Middle East’ and secondly, that it has become ‘post-Arab’ in the sense that Arab politics has ceased being distinctly Arab. Against this background, the article develops the understanding of a New Arab Cold War which accentuates the still important, but widely neglected Arab dimension in regional politics. By rediscovering the Arab Cold War of the 1950–60s and by drawing attention to the transformation of Arab nationalism and the importance of new trans-Arab media, the New Arab Cold War perspective aims at supplementing rather that supplanting the prominent moderate-radical, sectarian and Realist-Westphalian narratives. By highlighting dimensions of both continuity and change it does moreover provide some critical nuances to the frequent claims about the ‘newness’ of the ‘New Middle East’. In addition to this more Middle East-specific contribution, the article carries lessons for a number of more general debates in International Relations theory concerning the importance of (Arab-Islamist) non-state actors and competing identities in regional politics as well as the interplay between different forms of sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnolia- Spring 2002
    Magnolia Bulletin of the Magnolia grandiflora Southern Garden The Laurel Tree of Carolina Catesby’s Natural History, 1743 History Society Vol. XVII No. 3 Spring 2002 Gardening with Mrs. Balfour: An Antebellum Vicksburg Gardener By John Sykes, Baton Rouge, Louisiana clan on the Walnut Hills near the confluence of the n May 1853 Emma Balfour wrote her sister-in- Yazoo and the Mississippi Rivers.3 The commanding I law: “I wish you could see my garden location was the site of an early Spanish fort. now. It is really beautiful. The Some two hundred feet above the high roses are as fine as they can well be & I water mark of the river, the rolling hills have such a variety of other flowers presented an incredible vista across that the whole garden as one miles of flat delta land sweeping looks at it from the gallery West and North. A 19th- above or from the street looks century visitor commented on like a mass of flowers. It is the unusual geography: so complimented that I “There [is] only one way to begin to feel very account for the hills of proud.” 1 Throughout Vicksburg — after the the 1850s, Emma Lord of Creation had Harrison Balfour made all the big pursued her passion for mountains and ranges of gardening at her new hills, He had left on His home in Vicksburg, hands a large lot of Mississippi. For her scraps; these were all garden Emma Balfour dumped at Vicksburg . conducted an extensive ”4 The entrepreneurial search for plants from Parson Vick envisioned a friends, local nurseries town on the hills and and those available down managed to sell a lot before river from New Orleans.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Military Preparedness Commission Biennial Report Table of Contents
    Texas Military Preparedness Commission Biennial Report Table of Contents 2 Letter to the Governor 3 Executive Summary 4 The Defense Economy and Texas Highlights 6 The Commission Mission & Strategies Commissioners Ex-Officio Members Staff & Interns Funding Programs, Texas Military Value Revolving Loan Fund (TMVRLF) Funding Programs, Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant (DEAAG) Texas Military Value Task Force (TMVTF) Governor’s Committee to Support the Military (GCSM) 16 Texas Commander’s Council, Recommendations 18 State Defense Legislation 21 Military Installations in Texas: Overview and Economic Impact 22 Economic Impact: Methodology and Disclaimers 24 Economic Impact Map 25 U.S. Air Force Installations Dyess Air Force Base Goodfellow Air Force Base Laughlin Air Force Base Sheppard Air Force Base 34 U.S. Army Installations & Army Futures Command Corpus Christi Army Depot Fort Bliss Fort Hood Red River Army Depot Army Futures Command 45 U.S. Navy Installations Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth Naval Air Station Kingsville 52 Joint Base San Antonio & Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base 57 Texas Military Forces Air National Guard Army National Guard Texas State Guard 62 Resources: Wind Energy and Military Operations 64 Resources: Maps Cover photo courtesy of U.S. Army/ By Capt. Roxana Thompson 1 Letter to the Governor Dear Governor Abbott: On behalf of the Texas Military Preparedness Commission (TMPC), I am pleased to submit to you the 2019-2020 TMPC Biennial Report. It has been an eventful two years since our last biennial report to you. The military continues to grow in their missions as Texas seeks opportunities to continue being the best home to military personnel in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Second Lebanon War and Operation CAST LEAD
    BACK TO BASICS A Study of the Second Lebanon War and Operation CAST LEAD Lieutenant Colonel Scott C. Farquhar General Editor Combat Studies Institute Press US Army Combined Arms Center Fort Leavenworth, Kansas Form Approved Report Documentation Page OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 2. REPORT TYPE 2009 00-00-2009 to 00-00-2009 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Back to Basics. A Study of the Second Lebanon War and Operation 5b. GRANT NUMBER CAST LEAD 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION US Army Combined Arms Center,Combat Studies Institute,Fort REPORT NUMBER Leavenworth,KS,66027 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) 11.
    [Show full text]
  • George W Bush Childhood Home Reconnaissance Survey.Pdf
    Intermountain Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior August 2015 GEORGE W. BUSH CHILDHOOD HOME Reconnaissance Survey Midland, Texas Front cover: President George W. Bush and First Lady Laura Bush speak to the media after touring the President’s childhood home at 1421 West Ohio Avenue, Midland, Texas, on October 4, 2008. President Bush traveled to attend a Republican fundraiser in the town where he grew up. Photo: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images CONTENTS BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE — i SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — iii RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY PROCESS — v NPS CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE — vii National Historic Landmark Criterion 2 – viii NPS Theme Studies on Presidential Sites – ix GEORGE W. BUSH: A CHILDHOOD IN MIDLAND — 1 SUITABILITY — 17 Childhood Homes of George W. Bush – 18 Adult Homes of George W. Bush – 24 Preliminary Determination of Suitability – 27 HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF THE GEORGE W. BUSH CHILDHOOD HOME, MIDLAND TEXAS — 29 Architectural Description – 29 Building History – 33 FEASABILITY AND NEED FOR NPS MANAGEMENT — 35 Preliminary Determination of Feasability – 37 Preliminary Determination of Need for NPS Management – 37 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS — 39 APPENDIX: THE 41ST AND 43RD PRESIDENTS AND FIRST LADIES OF THE UNITED STATES — 43 George H.W. Bush – 43 Barbara Pierce Bush – 44 George W. Bush – 45 Laura Welch Bush – 47 BIBLIOGRAPHY — 49 SURVEY TEAM MEMBERS — 51 George W. Bush Childhood Home Reconnaissance Survey George W. Bush’s childhood bedroom at the George W. Bush Childhood Home museum at 1421 West Ohio Avenue, Midland, Texas, 2012. The knotty-pine-paneled bedroom has been restored to appear as it did during the time that the Bush family lived in the home, from 1951 to 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Damascus, Betraying Beirut: Hezbollah's Communication
    Defending Damascus, Betraying Beirut: Hezbollah’s Communication Strategies in the Syrian Civil War Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with research distinction in International Studies in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Maxwell Scurlock The Ohio State University April 2017 Project Advisor: Professor Jeffrey Lewis, International Studies Table of Contents Part 1 – Background Information and Historical Context Introduction – 1 1. Historical and Contextual Background – 6 a. Shi‘ism in Historical Context – 9 b. French Mandatory Period, 1920-1945 – 10 c. Independence to Black September, 1945-1970 – 14 d. The Early Years of the Lebanese Civil War and the Emergence of Hezbollah, 1970-1982 – 17 e. Hezbollah’s Formation – 21 f. Hezbollah’s Early Ideological Framework – 23 g. Syrian and Israeli Occupations of Lebanon, 1982-2005 – 24 h. Political Turmoil, 2006 Lebanon War, and 2008 Lebanese Political Crisis – 29 i. Hezbollah’s 2009 Manifesto – 31 j. The Syrian Civil War – 32 k. Sunni Islamists in Lebanon and Syria – 34 l. Lebanese Christians – 37 Part 2 – Analysis of Hezbollah’s Communications 2. Theoretical Approach to Hezbollah’s Communications – 40 3. Hezbollah in Syria – 44 a. Hezbollah’s Participation in Syria – April 30th, 2013 – 44 b. The Campaign for al-Qusayr, Part One – May 9th, 2013 – 48 c. The Campaign for al-Qusayr, Part Two – May 25th, 2013 – 50 4. Hezbollah’s Responses to Terrorism – 54 a. An Attack in al-Dahieh – August 16th, 2013 – 54 b. The Bombing of Iran’s Embassy – November 19th, 2013 – 56 5. Further Crises – 62 a. The Assassination of Hezbollah Commander Hassan al-Laqqis – December 3rd, 2013 – 62 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from the Second Lebanon War
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Browse Reports & Bookstore TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. All Glory Is Fleeting Insights from the Second Lebanon War Russell W. Glenn Prepared for the United States Joint Forces Command Approved for public release; distribution unlimited NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Joint Forces Command Joint Urban Operations Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgotten Palestinians
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 THE FORGOTTEN PALESTINIANS 10 1 2 3 4 5 6x 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36x 1 2 3 4 5 THE FORGOTTEN 6 PALESTINIANS 7 8 A History of the Palestinians in Israel 9 10 1 2 3 Ilan Pappé 4 5 6x 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS 5 NEW HAVEN AND LONDON 36x 1 In memory of the thirteen Palestinian citizens who were shot dead by the 2 Israeli police in October 2000 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 Copyright © 2011 Ilan Pappé 6 The right of Ilan Pappé to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by 7 him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 8 All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright 9 Law and except by reviewers for the public press) without written permission from 20 the publishers. 1 For information about this and other Yale University Press publications, 2 please contact: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #126
    #126 16 Nov 2001 USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Air University Air War College Maxwell AFB, Alabama Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with nuclear, biological and chemical threats and attacks. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established here at the Air War College in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-cps.htm for in-depth information and specific points of contact. Please direct any questions or comments on CPC Outreach Journal to Lt Col Michael W. Ritz, ANG Special Assistant to Director of CPC or Jo Ann Eddy, CPC Outreach Editor, at (334) 953-7538 or DSN 493-7538. To subscribe, change e-mail address, or unsubscribe to this journal or to request inclusion on the mailing list for CPC publications, please contact Mrs. Eddy. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Character Assassination As a Tool in International Politics (A Case Study of the United States-Russian Federation's Relations)
    MOLDOVA STATE UNIVERSITY As a manuscript C.Z.U.: 327(73+(470+571))(043,3) SMART JASON JAY CHARACTER ASSASSINATION AS A TOOL IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS (A CASE STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES-RUSSIAN FEDERATION’S RELATIONS) SPECIALTY 562.01 - THEORY AND METHODOLOGY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DIPLOMACY Doctoral thesis in Political Science Scientific adviser: Teosa Valentina, doctor hab. in Political Sciences, university professor Author: Smart Jason Jay CHISINAU, 2019 UNIVERSITATEA DE STAT DIN MOLDOVA Cu titlu de manuscris C.Z.U.: 327(73+(470+571))(043,3) SMART JASON JAY DENIGRAREA CA INSTRUMENT ÎN POLITICA INTERNAȚIONALĂ (STUDIUL DE CAZ AL RELAȚIILOR DINTRE STATELE UNITE ȘI FEDERAȚIA RUSĂ) SPECIALITATEA 562.01 – TEORIA ŞI METODOLOGIA RELAŢIILOR INTERNAŢIONALE ŞI A DIPLOMAȚIEI Teza de doctor în ştiinţe politice Conducător ştiinţific: Teosa Valentina, doctor hab. în ştiinţe politice, profesor universitar Autorul: Smart Jason Jay CHIŞINAU, 2019 2 © Smart, Jason Jay 2019 3 CONTENT ANNOTATIONS (in Romanian, English, and Russian) ….……………………………….….….6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS………………………………….……………………….………..9 INTRODUCTION.…………………………………………………………………………...….10 1. HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THEORETICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF CHARACTER ASSASSINATION IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS …………………………...................17 1.1. Character Assassination in Political Science: A Historiographical Study…………………....18 1.2. Theoretical Fundamentals of Character Assassination Study in Political Science………..….31 1.3. Conclusions to Chapter 1……………………………………………..……….…………..….46 2. CHARACTER ASSASSINATION IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS: EVOLUTION OF APPROACHES IN RUSSIAN AND AMERICAN HISTORY….…………………...……….49 2.1. The Dissertation’s Methodology of Researching Character Assassination in International Politics……………………………………………………………………………………….…….50 2.2. The Russian Tradition of Character Assassination in Internal and Foreign Politics………....63 2.3. Contradictions within American Approaches to Character Assassination in Politics …….…78 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • AUCTION CATALOG Allie Warnecke 8Th Grade
    AUCTION CATALOG Allie Warnecke 8th Grade Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Mike Warnecke are proud to support The Episcopal School of Dallas ABU DHABI DUBAI HONG KONG LONGVIEW PHILADELPHIA SINGAPORE AUSTIN FRANKFURT HOUSTON LOS ANGELES SAN ANTONIO WASHINGTON, D.C. BEIJING FORT WORTH IRVINE MOSCOW SAN FRANCISCO DALLAS GENEVA LONDON NEW YORK Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP is a leading global law firm providing innovative legal services and business solutions to individuals and institutions. Founded in 1945 by Richard Gump and Robert Strauss with the guiding vision that commitment, excellence and integrity would drive its success, the firm focuses on building lasting and mutually beneficial relationships with its clients. Our firm’s clients range from individuals to corporations and nations. We offer clients a broad-spectrum approach, with over 85 practices that range from traditional strengths such as appellate, corporate and public policy to 21st century concentrations such as climate change, intellectual property litigation and national security. © 2016 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising. akingump.com THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS PARENTS’ ASSOCIATION & THE 2016 AUCTION COMMITTEE present Allie Warnecke 8th Grade Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Mike Warnecke are proud to support The Episcopal School of Dallas ABU DHABI DUBAI HONG KONG LONGVIEW PHILADELPHIA SINGAPORE AUSTIN FRANKFURT HOUSTON LOS ANGELES SAN ANTONIO WASHINGTON, D.C. BEIJING FORT WORTH IRVINE MOSCOW SAN FRANCISCO DALLAS GENEVA LONDON NEW YORK Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP is a leading global law firm providing innovative legal services and business solutions to individuals and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cowboy Politics: the Changing Frontier Myth and the Presidencies Of
    COWBOY POLITICS: THE CHANGING FRONTIER MYTH AND PRESIDENCIES OF THEODORE ROOSEVELT, LYNDON JOHNSON, RONALD REAGAN AND GEORGE W. BUSH A Dissertation Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN SASKATOON BY DAVID ALEXANDER SMITH © Copyright David Alexander Smith, April 2016. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my dissertation work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my dissertation work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication of use of this dissertation or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my dissertation. DISCLAIMER Reference in this dissertation to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favouring by the University of Saskatchewan. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not state or reflect those of the University of Saskatchewan, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
    [Show full text]