The Transition of New Tendencies from Neo-Avant- Garde Subculture to Institutional Mainstream Culture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Transition of New Tendencies from Neo-Avant- Garde Subculture to Institutional Mainstream Culture The Transition of New Tendencies from Neo-Avant- Garde Subculture to Institutional Mainstream Culture. An Example of Network Analysis. Kolešnik, Ljiljana Source / Izvornik: Modern and Contemporary Artists' Networks. An Inquiry into Digital History of Art and Architecture, 2018, 84 - 122 Book chapter / Poglavlje u knjizi Publication status / Verzija rada: Published version / Objavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF) https://doi.org/10.31664/9789537875596.05 Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:254:605097 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-06 Repository / Repozitorij: PODEST - Institute of Art History Repository The Transition of New Tendencies from Neo-Avant-Garde Subculture INTRODUCTION in the canon of new media art history.156 to Institutional Mainstream Culture. An Example of Network Analysis. In the course of that process – lasting from History of international art movement New 2005 to, approximately, 2010 – archival Tendencies, attracted researchers attention documents on New Tendencies earlier his- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31664/9789537875596.05 just recently, following a (re)discovery of tory, on the events and exhibitions held be- the series of discursive events (seminars, tween 1961 and 1965, were also carefully conferences, colloquia), and exhibitions explored, and explained, but in a manner (Computers and Visual Arts, Tendencije 4, which downplayed, or outright neglected Art and Computers, Tendencije 5), held in the ideological presumptions of the move- Zagreb, at the end of the 1960’s, and at ment, and its direct engagement with the the beginning of 1970s. Shortly after they social, and political reality at the time. The were “discovered” – between 2006, and strategy of curtailing and decreasing the 2010 – New Tendencies became the subject importance of New Tendencies’ social ob- of several large international exhibitions,155 jectives,157 and their relation to both Europe’s presenting legacy of the movement in terms new left, as well to the political, social and of an important and forgotten episode cultural practices of Yugoslav socialism, to of new media art history. Art works and make them fit to a predefined requirements printed materials (exhibition catalogues, of the new media art history canon, spar- magazines, working papers), private and kled the interest in the that period in the official correspondence among the artists, history of New Tendencies. The result was curators, and theorists engaged in discus- still another, recently published series of sions on the “computer supported visual monographs and studies on cultural, social Ljiljana Kolešnik research”, a central theme of New Tenden- and political framework of the movement, cies between 1968 to 1973, were carefully which constructed their accounts of New collected, described, and interpreted in Tendencies by closely following the traces order to provided a discursive framework they have left in visual arts and visual culture for the inclusion of that particular episode (graphic design, experimental film, TV), but from the overall story of the movement also in a debates on cultural policies, and political issues at the time.158 Along with the 155 Die Neuen Tendenzen Eine europäische 156 Tobias Hoffmann: Die neuen Tendenzen: Künstlerbewegung 1961-1973, Museum für Eine europäische Künstlerbewegung 1961- konkrete Kunst Ingolstadt, Sept 29. 2006 1973 (Heidelberg: Edition Braus, 2006); – Jan 7., 2007; Leopold-Hoesch-Museum, Christoph Klütsch: Computergrafik: Düren, 28 Jan-25 Mar 2007; bit interna- Ästhetische Experimente zwischen zwei tional – [Nove] tendencije Computer und Kulturen. Die Anfänge der Computerkunst visuelle Forschung. Zagreb 1961–1973, in den 1960er Jahren (Vienna/New York: Nueu Galerie Graz am Landesmuseum Springer, 2007); Margit Rosen, at al., eds: Joanneum, 28.4-26.8.2007; bit interna- A Little-Known Story about a Movement, A tional. [Nove] Tendencije - Computer und Magazine, And the Computer’s Arrival In visuelle Forschung, Zagreb 1961-1973, Art: New Tendencies and Bit International, ZKM, Karlsruhe, 2008/2009; New Tendencies 1961–1973 (Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, and Architecture: Abstraction, Ambience, 2011). Algorithm, International Architecture Exhibition, Venice, Aug 2014. Nowa sztuka 157 See, for example, Rosen, A Little Known. dla nowego społeczeństwa / New Art For 158 Jasna Jakšić, Ivana Kancir, eds.: New Society/, Muzeum Współczesne Wrocław, Nowa sztuka dla nowego społeczeńst- 84 85 2015. wa / New Art For New Society/ (Wrocław: descriptions of working procedures, com- azines, critical studies, polemics), and com- in their history (968-1973), as a phenom- sive discussions on its potential to outgrow munication practices, personal, and pro- paration with similar artistic tendencies at enological, artistic, and – in terms of the such format, were already underway.161 In fessional relationships among artists, art other European locations. engaged approach to the existential re- that respect, describing New Tendencies as groups, and cultural professionals involved As a consequence, some previous expla- ality of modern, industrial society – cultur- just another, although important “biannual with the movement, they also provided a nations of the important turning points and al entity on its own right, which is, as such, exhibition” of the Cold War era, might be detailed, theoretically informed analysis of well-known events from the overall history also included in the historic narratives on unjustified, but it is – from my point of view – New Tendencies’ ideological, and social as- of the movement were proven to be ideo- kinetic and programmed art of the 1960s. as inappropriate, as it is a widely accepted pirations, presented on the background of logically biased, and superficial. The same Although inscribed in those narratives as an signifier “international art movement”. the global Cold War politics, and in relation could be claimed for the contact points, international art movement, the insistence Gathering, over the period of twelve years to the transition from industrial to post-in- divergences and borderlines among certain on self-imposed theoretical, and formal rig- a several hundred artists from three conti- dustrial, information society. Descriptions of political and aesthetic choices constituent or, and on the “ideological concentration nents, and from both sides of the Iron cur- New Tendencies as an attempt in formulat- to its programmatic orientation, seeming and commonality of goals”, typical for the tain, New Tendencies were simply too big, ing a socially progressive artistic practice to be quite different if approached from organization model of art movement, was and lasted too long, to maintain the level engaged with science and technology, also the perspective informed by the social and apparent only in period between 1963 and of formal coherence, poetic integrity, and assumed explanations of its inner conflicts, political history of the 1960s, and 1970s. 1965. What New Tendencies were before that theoretical rigor implied by the term “artis- and contradictions grounded in a thorough In other words, those recent findings, and short-time interval, and after 1965, how they tic movement”. There were, however – as in examination of historical documentation accounts made it clear that it is necessary were organized and which was their modus the period between 1963 and 1965 – some (publications, private and official letters, to conduct a thorough reexamination of operandi is another, serious question. serious attempts in defining a common pro- manuscripts), public responses (exhibitions both poetic and political configuration of Some authors as, for example, Piotr Pi- gram, shared goals and rules of conduct in- reviews in daily press and specialized mag- on New Tendencies. otrowski, perceive New Tendencies as an tended to provide New Tendencies with the The attempt in describing process of articu- ambitious, periodical exhibition of contem- prerogatives of an art movement. However, :Muzeum Współczesne Wrocław, 2015); Armin lation, and dissemination of the discourse on porary art,160 which managed to transcend both the nature of these prerogatives, that Medsoch: New Tendencies. Art at the art and technology created in the context of national and ideological borders estab- have been too formal, and restrictive, and Threshold of the Information Revolution that art movement between 1961 and 1965, lished by the Cold War politics. Preferring the oppressive manner of the attempts of (1961 - 1978) (Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 2016); Ljiljana Kolešnik, “Zagreb that is, the attempt in describing series of the signifier “New Tendencies biennale”, their impositions were met with the resist- as the Location of the New Tendencies exhibitions, and discussions comprising for and basically referring to the rhythm of Za- ance. The response to such an attempts in International Art Movement (1961–73)”, in the chronology of the movement’s transition greb exhibitions, such approach tends to a wider cultural context sympathetic to the Art beyond Borders: Artistic Exchange in from the framework of neo-avant-garde ar- overlook the overall meaning and effects of concept of “art as research”, was a mix- Communist Europe (1945-1989), eds. Jérôme tistic subculture to the realm of institutional numerous discussions, working meetings, ture approval and restrain, or as American Bazin, Pascal Dubourg Glatigny, and Piotr culture, grounded on the reconstruction and publications, international
Recommended publications
  • Minerva Auctions
    MINERVA AUCTIONS ARTE MODERNA E CONTEMPORANEA MARTEDÌ 28 APRILE 2015 MINERVA AUCTIONS Palazzo Odescalchi Piazza SS. Apostoli 80 - 00187 Roma Tel: +39 06 679 1107 - Fax: +39 06 699 23 077 [email protected] www.minervaauctions.com FOLLOW US ON: Facebook Twitter Instagram LIBRI, AUTOGRAFI E STAMPE GIOIELLI, OROLOGI E ARGENTI Fabio Massimo Bertolo Andrea de Miglio Auction Manager & Capo Reparto Capo Reparto Silvia Ferrini Beatrice Pagani, Claudia Pozzati Office Manager & Esperto Amministratori DIPINTI E DISEGNI ANTICHI FOTOGRAFIA Valentina Ciancio Marica Rossetti Capo Reparto Specialist Adele Coggiola Junior Specialist & Amministratore Public Relations Muriel Marinuzzi Ronconi Amministrazione Viola Marzoli ARTE DEL XIX SECOLO Magazzino e spedizioni Claudio Vennarini Luca Santori Capo Reparto ARTE MODERNA E CONTEMPORANEA Georgia Bava Capo Reparto Photo Stefano Compagnucci Silvia Possanza Layout Giovanni Morelli Amministratore Print CTS Grafica srl MINERVA AUCTIONS ROMA 111 ARTE MODERNA E CONTEMPORANEA MARTEDÌ 28 APRILE 2015 ROMA, PALAZZO ODESCALCHI Piazza SS. Apostoli 80 PRIMA TORNATA - ORE 11 (LOTTI 1 - 169) SECONDA TORNATA - ORE 16 (LOTTI 170 - 349) ESPERTO / SPECIALIST Georgia Bava [email protected] REPARTO / DEPARTMENT Silvia Possanza [email protected] Per partecipare a questa asta online: www.liveauctioneers.com www.invaluable.com ESPOSIZIONE / VIEWING ROMA Da venerdì 24 a lunedì 27 aprile, ore 10.00 - 18.00 PREVIEW Per visionare i nostri cataloghi visitate il sito: ROMA www.minervaauctions.com Giovedì 23 aprile, ore 18.00 PRIMA TORNATA ORE 11 (LOTTI 1 - 169) Lotto 1 α 1 Jannis Kounellis (Pireo 1936) ROSA cartoncino sagomato e carta Japon nacrè, es.1/12, cm 76,5 x 57 Firma a matita in basso a sinistra Una piega al margine inferiore e tracce di umidità ai margini ed al verso.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Henderikse to Infinity
    press release JAN HENDERIKSE TO INFINITY Galerie Schoots + Van Duyse, Antwerp, and Kunstzolder.be, Lembeke Curator: Antoon Melissen JAN HENDERIKSE TO INFINITY Summary From 28 June to 27 September, Galerie Schoots + Van Duyse in 100 words and Kunstzolder.be are staging an exhibition in Antwerp by Dutch artist Jan Henderikse (Delft, 1937), curated by independent publicist-curator Antoon Melissen. Henderikse, co-founder of the Dutch Nul Group in 1961, already moved to Dusseldorf in 1959, at that time the cradle of the international ZERO movement. ‘Jan Henderikse - ZERO to Infinity’ features work both from the Nul period and from later, including the most recent work from 2015. Furthermore, several large assemblages made in 1965-1967 from the collection of the artist have never previously been exhibited. JAN HENDERIKSE TO INFINITY Consistent with the increasing interest and revaluation of the international ZERO movement, Galerie Schoots + Van Duyse and Kunstzolder.be are organizing a major presentation by Jan Henderikse in Antwerp. In 1961, Henderikse (together with Armando, Henk Peeters and Jan Schoonhoven), was co-founder of the Dutch Nul Group, the artists’ group that expressly sought contact with the international ZERO movement and its sympathizers. Since 2000, Henderikse has been working both in New York and in his studio in Antwerp and is thus, together with Paul van Hoeydonck, one of the last artists of the ‘ZERO generation’ still active in Belgium. Under the title ‘Jan Henderikse - ZERO to Infinity’, independent publicist-curator Antoon Melissen has compiled an exhibition that contrasts early work from the Nul era with new work. Several large assemblages made in 1965-1967 from the collection of the artist have never previously been shown and are premiered in the exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Export / Import: the Promotion of Contemporary Italian Art in the United States, 1935–1969
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2016 Export / Import: The Promotion of Contemporary Italian Art in the United States, 1935–1969 Raffaele Bedarida Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/736 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] EXPORT / IMPORT: THE PROMOTION OF CONTEMPORARY ITALIAN ART IN THE UNITED STATES, 1935-1969 by RAFFAELE BEDARIDA A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 RAFFAELE BEDARIDA All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Art History in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________ Date Professor Emily Braun Chair of Examining Committee ___________________________________________________________ Date Professor Rachel Kousser Executive Officer ________________________________ Professor Romy Golan ________________________________ Professor Antonella Pelizzari ________________________________ Professor Lucia Re THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT EXPORT / IMPORT: THE PROMOTION OF CONTEMPORARY ITALIAN ART IN THE UNITED STATES, 1935-1969 by Raffaele Bedarida Advisor: Professor Emily Braun Export / Import examines the exportation of contemporary Italian art to the United States from 1935 to 1969 and how it refashioned Italian national identity in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Art in Europe 1945 — 1968 the Continent That the EU Does Not Know
    Art in Europe 1945 Art in — 1968 The Continent EU Does that the Not Know 1968 The The Continent that the EU Does Not Know Art in Europe 1945 — 1968 Supplement to the exhibition catalogue Art in Europe 1945 – 1968. The Continent that the EU Does Not Know Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Trauma and Remembrance Abstraction The Crisis of Easel Painting Trauma and Remembrance Art Informel and Tachism – Material Painting – 33 Gestures of Abstraction The Painting as an Object 43 49 The Cold War 39 Arte Povera as an Artistic Guerilla Tactic 53 Phase 6: Phase 7: Phase 8: New Visions and Tendencies New Forms of Interactivity Action Art Kinetic, Optical, and Light Art – The Audience as Performer The Artist as Performer The Reality of Movement, 101 105 the Viewer, and Light 73 New Visions 81 Neo-Constructivism 85 New Tendencies 89 Cybernetics and Computer Art – From Design to Programming 94 Visionary Architecture 97 Art in Europe 1945 – 1968. The Continent that the EU Does Not Know Introduction Praga Magica PETER WEIBEL MICHAEL BIELICKY 5 29 Phase 4: Phase 5: The Destruction of the From Representation Means of Representation to Reality The Destruction of the Means Nouveau Réalisme – of Representation A Dialog with the Real Things 57 61 Pop Art in the East and West 68 Phase 9: Phase 10: Conceptual Art Media Art The Concept of Image as From Space-based Concept Script to Time-based Imagery 115 121 Art in Europe 1945 – 1968. The Continent that the EU Does Not Know ZKM_Atria 1+2 October 22, 2016 – January 29, 2017 4 At the initiative of the State Museum Exhibition Introduction Center ROSIZO and the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow, the institutions of the Center for Fine Arts Brussels (BOZAR), the Pushkin Museum, and ROSIZIO planned and organized the major exhibition Art in Europe 1945–1968 in collaboration with the ZKM | Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome – Milan: Space and Colour, Rhythm and Matter 1 October
    Press Release Rome – Milan: Space and Colour, Rhythm and Matter 1 October – 28 November 2020 Private View: 1 October 2020, 12-8pm by appointment Mazzoleni is delighted to announce the launch of the new exhibition season in its London gallery on 1 October 2020, with the group show Rome – Milan: Space and Colour, Rhythm and Matter. The show brings together a number of the leading figures of the Italian art scene that were operating in these two major Italian cities with works realised mainly between the 1950s and 1960s. Acclaimed for their artistic revolutions, pioneers Lucio Fontana (1899-1968) and Alberto Burri (1915-1995) were the points of departure and reference for the experimentation later conducted by the artists born in the 1930s such as Agostino Bonalumi (1935-2013), Enrico Castellani (1930-2017), Dadamaino (1930-2004), Jannis Kounellis (1936-2017), Piero Manzoni (1933-1963) and Mario Schifano (1934-1998). They were to explore new and further strands of research as their artistic careers evolved. Fontana’s innovative reflections on space and Burri’s in-depth experimentation with materials were to be the driving forces behind the development of new artistic idioms. In parallel, predominantly through painting, Giulio Turcato (1912-1995), Piero Dorazio (1927-2005) and Carla Accardi (1924 -2014) (already members of the group Forma 1) combined a skilled use of shapes and colours with new “painterly” materials such as, foam rubber, enamels and casein. Meanwhile Giuseppe Capogrossi (1900-1972), the founder with Burri of the Origine group, developed a personal sign alphabet. In sculpture, from his debut alongside Lucio Fontana, Fausto Melotti (1901-1986) developed a lyrical and poetic dimension that led him to a truly unique artistic path of the Italian art scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Yaacov Agam. Transformable - Transformables
    1 [AGAM]..YAACOV AGAM. New York, Marlborough-Gerson Gallery 1966. 22x21. 52 pp. including 4 pages on one folding leaf. More than 70 photos and reproductions including 10 in colour. Pictorial wrappers. 200 2 [AGAM]..YAACOV AGAM. TRANSFORMABLE - TRANSFORMABLES. New York, Galerie Denise René, 1971. 26x21. 52 pp. + 6 opaque leaves with drawings. 76 photos, 26 full-page including 2 in colour, plus 12 portrait photos etc. Pictorial wrappers. Exhibition publication with introduction by Jean-Jacques Lévèque. 300 4 3 Alechinsky, Pierre / Christian Dotremont. ABSTRATES. Printed in Denmark (Copenhagen) by Permild & Rosengreen 1963. Colour lithograph 64x87 with text rendered in "tapuscrit. No. 14 of 25 numbered copies, signed in pencil by Alechinsky. This copy also has a pencil inscription "Pour mon ami Rune J. / Christian Dotremont" (to the Swedish artist Rune Jansson). Very weak damp streak in lower left corner, otherwise fine. A collaboration of the two Cobra co-founders consisting of a vivid colour print made by Alechinsky around a text by Dotremont. 5000 4 Alechinsky, Pierre. L'AVENIR DE LA PROPRIETÉ. (Paris), Yves Rivière, 1972. 31x21. 64 pp. + a loosely inserted colour etching signed by Alechinsky. 35 facsimile reproductions including 15 full- or double-page. A beautiful copy in pictorial covers with protective glassine wrapper, kept in the original decorated slipcase. No. 159 of 999 copies, signed by Alechinsky and Rivière. From the total edition of 999, this is one of 151 copies numbered 100-250 and provided with an original colour etching printed on an 18th-century manuscript leaf. The etching is signed by Alechinsky and numbered 59 (of 151 plus 16 H.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine Ingrams
    HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.14324/111.2396-9008.034 ‘A KIND OF FISSURE’: FORMA (1947-1949) Catherine Ingrams We declare ourselves to be Formalists and Marxists, convinced that the terms Marxism and Formalism are not irreconcilable, especially today when the progressive elements of our society must maintain a revolutionary avant-garde position and not give over to a spent and conformist realism that in its most recent examples have demonstrated what a limited and narrow road it is on.1 hese are the opening lines of Forma’s manifesto, signed in Rome in March 1947 by eight young artists: Carla Accardi, Ugo Attardi, Pietro TConsagra, Piero Dorazio, Mino Guerrini, Achille Perilli, Antonio Sanfilippo and Giulio Turcato. They had met during the previous year through the realist painter, Renato Guttuso, a fellow member of the Italian Communist Party (the PCI) and a would-be mentor to them. Guttuso was on a trip to Paris when Forma signed their manifesto in his studio, a place where he had been letting many of them stay. With its contemptuous dismissal of realism, together with the method of its execution, Forma’s manifesto came as a compound rejection of Guttuso’s art, his hospitality and his network of connections, and it acted as a deliberate gesture of rupture, one which announced Forma’s ambitions to belong to ‘a revolutionary avant-garde’. In the discussion that follows, I connect Forma’s rhetoric of rupture with a more complex socio-political context, and I move to engage their art as a gesture of historical resistance worked through their reimagined return to the theories of Russian Formalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Press Release LIGHT IN MOTION: Balla, Dorazio, Zappettini 30 September – 9 December 2017 Private View: Friday 29 September, 6–8pm Mazzoleni is pleased to announce its autumn exhibition ‘LIGHT IN MOTION: Balla, Dorazio, Zappettini’, whicH will explore shared tHemes in tHe work of three major Italian artists working througHout the 20th century, Giacomo Balla (1871–1958), Piero Dorazio (1927–2005) and Gianfranco Zappettini (b. 1939). The exhibition will bring together key works by each artist to demonstrate their shared mastery of ligHt, colour and perception during three pivotal moments in Post-War Italian art, Futurism, Lyrical Abstraction and Pittura Analitica. The exhibition will include over a dozen works on loan from private collections, never before exhibited in tHe UK. It is curated by Elena Gigli. Giacomo Balla, whose work was recently tHe subject of a major exHibition at tHe Estorick Collection, was a key proponent of Futurism. An original co-signatory of Marinetti’s Futurist Manifesto, signed in Milan in 1910, Balla was a pioneering figure of European Modernism. His work influenced many artists between tHe late 19tH and early 20tH centuries, with its characteristic preoccupation with new technology, speed, movement and light. He and his Futurist contemporaries were interested in abstract explorations of the rapidly evolving tecHnological advances of the time. The geometric style Balla developed, often composed of intersecting colourful bands, was cHampioned for its evocation of movement. BotH tHese Futurist works and tHe earlier Divisionist works that Balla produced at the start of his career were hugely influential on the development of younger artists, including subsequent collaborators and Futurist contemporaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    Josef Albers Max Bill Piero Dorazio Manuel Espinosa Friedrich Vordemberge-Gildewart Manuel Espinosa in Europe Josef Albers Max Bill Piero Dorazio Manuel Espinosa Friedrich Vordemberge-Gildewart Frieze Masters 2019 - Stand E7 Manuel Espinosa and his European Grand Tour Dr. Flavia Frigeri Once upon a time, it was fashionable among young members of the British and northern European upper classes to embark on what came to be known as the Grand Tour. A rite of passage of sorts, the Grand Tour was predicated on the exploration of classical antiquity and Renaissance masterpieces encountered on a pilgrimage extending from France all the way to Greece. Underpinning this journey of discovery was a sense of cultural elevation, which in turn fostered a revival of classical ideals and gave birth to an international network of artists and thinkers. The Grand Tour reached its apex in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, after which interest in the great classical beauties of France, Italy and Greece slowly waned.1 Fast-forward to 1951, the year in which the Argentine artist Manuel Espinosa left his native Buenos Aires to embark on his own Grand Tour of Europe. Unlike his cultural forefathers, Espinosa was not lured by 4 Fig. 1 Founding members of the Concrete-Invention Art Association pictured in 1946. Espinosa is third from the right, back row. Photo: Saderman. the qualities of classical and Renaissance Europe, but what propelled him to cross an ocean and spend an extended period of time away from home was the need to establish a dialogue with his abstract-concrete European peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Kusama 2 1 Zero Gutai Kusama
    ZERO GUTAI KUSAMA 2 1 ZERO GUTAI KUSAMA VIEWING Bonhams 101 New Bond Street London, W1S 1SR Sunday 11 October 11.00 - 17.00 Monday 12 October 9.00 - 18.00 Tuesday 13 October 9.00 - 18.00 Wednesday 14 October 9.00 - 18.00 Thursday 15 October 9.00 - 18.00 Friday 16 October 9.00 - 18.00 Monday 19 October 9.00 - 17.00 Tuesday 20 October 9.00 - 17.00 EXHIBITION CATALOGUE £25.00 ENQUIRIES Ralph Taylor +44 (0) 20 7447 7403 [email protected] Giacomo Balsamo +44 (0) 20 7468 5837 [email protected] PRESS ENQUIRIES +44 (0) 20 7468 5871 [email protected] 2 1 INTRODUCTION The history of art in the 20th Century is punctuated by moments of pure inspiration, moments where the traditions of artistic practice shifted on their foundations for ever. The 1960s were rife with such moments and as such it is with pleasure that we are able to showcase the collision of three such bodies of energy in one setting for the first time since their inception anywhere in the world with ‘ZERO Gutai Kusama’. The ZERO and Gutai Groups have undergone a radical reappraisal over the past six years largely as a result of recent exhibitions at the New York Guggenheim Museum, Berlin Martin Gropius Bau and Amsterdam Stedelijk Museum amongst others. This escalation of interest is entirely understandable coming at a time where experts and collectors alike look to the influences behind the rapacious creativity we are seeing in the Contemporary Art World right now and in light of a consistently strong appetite for seminal works.
    [Show full text]
  • The Responsive Eye by William C
    The responsive eye By William C. Seitz. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, in collaboration with the City Art Museum of St. Louis [and others Author Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.) Date 1965 Publisher [publisher not identified] Exhibition URL www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/2914 The Museum of Modern Art's exhibition history— from our founding in 1929 to the present—is available online. It includes exhibition catalogues, primary documents, installation views, and an index of participating artists. MoMA © 2017 The Museum of Modern Art MoMA 757 c.2 r//////////i LIBRARY Museumof ModernArt ARCHIVE wHgeugft. TheResponsive Eye BY WILLIAM C. SEITZ THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CITY ART MUSEUM OF ST. LOUIS, THE CONTEMPORARY ART COUNCIL OF THE SEATTLE ART MUSEUM, THE PASADENA ART MUSEUM AND THE BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART /4/t z /w^- V TRUSTEES OF THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART David Rockefeller, Chairman of the Board; Henry Allen Moe, Vice-Chairman;William S. Paley, Vice-Chairman; Mrs. Bliss Parkinson, Vice-Chairman;William A. M. Burden, President; James Thrall Soby, Vice-President;Ralph F. Colin, Vice-President;Gardner Cowles, Vice-President;Wa l ter Bareiss, Alfred H. Barr, Jr., *Mrs. Robert Woods Bliss, Willard C. Butcher, *Mrs. W. Murray Crane, John de Menil, Rene d'Harnoncourt, Mrs. C. Douglas Dillon, Mrs. Edsel B. Ford, *Mrs. Simon Guggenheim, Wallace K. Harrison, Mrs. Walter Hochschild, "James W. Husted, Philip Johnson, Mrs. Albert D. Lasker,John L. Loeb, Ranald H. Macdonald, Porter A. McCray, *Mrs. G. Macculloch Miller, Mrs. Charles S.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberto Burri: the Art of the Matter
    Alberto Burri: The Art of the Matter Judith Rozner A thesis submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Volume I – Text Volume II - Illustration March 2015 School of Culture and Communication. The University of Melbourne. Produced on archival quality paper i VOLUME I ii For Avraham and Malka Ur iii iv ABSTRACT "Alberto Burri, an Italian artist of the immediate post WWII period, introduced common, everyday materials into his art. In so doing material became both the subject of his work as well as the object out of which the work was made. This thesis argues that the primary purpose of Burri's work throughout his career was to provoke a tactile, sensuous response in the viewer, a response which can best be understood through the lens of phenomenology." v vi DECLARATION This is to certify that: I. The thesis comprises only my original work. II. Due acknowledgment has been made in the text to all other material used. III. The thesis is less than 100.000 words in length exclusive of tables, maps, bibliography and appendices. Judith Rozner vii viii Preface In 1999, following an introduction by a mutual friend, I was invited by Minsa Craig- Burri, the widow of the artist Alberto Burri, to help her compile a biography of her life with her husband.1 I stayed and worked on the manuscript at their home at 59, Blvd. Eduard VII, in Beaulieu-sur-Mar, in the South of France for about six weeks. I had not seen the artist’s work before my arrival, and on my first encounter with it I just shrugged my shoulders and raised my eyebrows at the high prices it commanded in the market.
    [Show full text]