DOCSLIB.ORG

UN ODIEUX GUET.APENS Leparti D'abdul Rahman Ghassemlou

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UN ODIEUX GUET.APENS Leparti D'abdul Rahman Ghassemlou INSTITUT URD DE PARIS Information and liaison bulletin ISpecial Issue I July-August 1989 This bulletin is issued in French, German, Enghh. Kurdish, Spanish and Turkish. Price per issue: (France) 25 FF, (ElsewheJe): 30 p:.. Annual subscribtion (12 issues) France: 240 FF, (E sl'where) 265 FF Monthly review Director of publication: Mohamad HASSAN numero de la Commission Paritaire: 659 i5 A.S. ISSN 0761 1285 INSTITUT KURDE 106, rue La Fayette - 7iOlQ PARV; Tel.: (1) 48 24 64 64 - Fax: (1) 47 70 99 Oit spec/a/Issue: A. R. GHASSEMLOU SUMMARY o TRIPLE MURDER IN VIENNA o WHO ARE THE ASSASSINS AND WHAT HAS BECOME OF THEM? o ATTITUDE OF THE AUSTRIAN GOVERNMENT o PUBLIC EMOTIONS AND THE SILENCE OF STATES o FUNERAL SERVICES IN PARIS : MOMENT OF STRONG KURDISH NATIONAL UNITY o PORTRAITS OF THE KURDISH MARTYRS o SPECIAL RESOLUTIONSOF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN PARIS o ACCOUNT OF THE NEGOTIATIONS BETWEENTHE IRANIAN KURDISH MOVEMENT AND THE TEHRAN AUTHORITIES o BRIEF PRESSREVIEWS TRIPLE MURDER IN VIENNA n Thursday, July 13th 1989, at approximately 7 Socialist Congress, having come to Vienna on Tues- pm, the Kurdish Iranian leader AbelelRahman day evening, July 11th,to meet with Iranian emissaries Ghassemlou, Secretary General of the Demo- delegated by RAFSANDJANI, the then powerful presi- O cratic Party of Kurdistan of Iran, and two other dent of the Iranian Parliament and declared candidate important Kurdish individuals, Abdoullah GHADERI- for the presidency of the Republic. The following day, AlAR, representative of the PDKI in Europe, and along with Ghaderi-Azar and Dr. F. Rassoul, Ghas- Dr. Fadhel RASSOUL, researcher at the University of semlou had his first meeting at 2:30 pm with these Vienna, were assassinated inan apartment on Lindes- "emissanes». Because of marked progress during the trasse Street in Vienna. The assassination occurred course of this first meeting, a second and final meeting while they were in the process of peace talks with had been called for Thursday the 13th at 5 pm. That Iranian government emissaries. Dr. Ghassemlou had day, around 4:45 pm, the PDKI representative in Vien- come to Europe to participate in the International na dropped off Ghassemlou and Ghaderi-Azar infront INFORMATION AND UAISON BUUETIN 2 of the Hilton Hotel, approximately 100 meters from the went Into the building and realized what had happened: meeting point. As arranged, he carne back to the same the bodies of A. Ghaderl.Azar and Dr. F. Rassoul were place to pick them up around 7:15; they were not there. lying In pools of blood on the carpet and Ghassemlou was slouched In an armchair. The apartment was In He drove off and came back again at 7:30; he saw complete disorder, Indicating that a fierce struggle police cars and some people gathered In front of a must have taken place between the killers and Ghas- building on L1ndestrasse Street, close to the Hilton. He semlou's two companions. WHO ARE THE ASSASSINS AND WHAT HAS BECOME OF THEM? The Inquest by the Austrian police rapidly established strange client being very nervous and asking to be that the killers had not broken into the apartment. taken tothe airport, then changing his mind and asking Neitherthe front doorto the apartment nor the lock had to be taken to the Iranian Embassy. been forced. As early as July 17th, the ballstic report established that the assassinations had been carried Nobody has seen him since. The Austrian justice out by people standing facing the victims. Contrary to a minister affirmed at the end of August that Moustafawi version of the story diffused by Iranian propaganda, was still to be found on Austrian territory and that a war- there is no doubt that an outsider came to commit this rant for his arrest had been sent out at the end of July. crime, neither the moudjahiddin, nor Iraqi agents. The Other witnesses maintain having seen Moustafawi Kurdish figures, carrying no weapons, were assassina- walking about freely in the Iranian capital In September. ted by so-called Iranian negotiators that turned out to be everyday killers. Mohammad Jafar Sahraroudl was injured at the site of the crime by a bullet hitting his forearm and then the The identity of these «emissaries» was all the more lower part of his face. Before, during orafterthe attack? easily established because the same ones had partici- He was taken to Franz Josef Hospital where the report pated in December 1988 in the first set of talks With he gave to the police was incoherent and contradicted Ghassemlou (and now again in Vienna). The three the facts given by Bozorgian. The Austrian authonties people in question are: Mohammad Jafar SAHAROU- decided to confine him to a residence so that he could 01 (alias RAHIMI), head of the Iranian delegation, a be acceSSible to the courts. Sahraroundi and Mousta- high government official at the Ministry of the Interior, fawi were both holders of diplomatic passports. but they specialist on the Kurdish question, assistant comman- were not accredited. On July 22nd 1989, upon leaving der-in-chief of the 15th Division of the Pasdarans Army the hospital, Sahraroudi was escorted by police to the (soldiers of the Islamic revolution), special envoy of airport where he was sent directly to Tehran. From RAFSANDJANI, current President of Iran; Hadji informed sources we know that the Minister of Foreign MOUSTAFAWI (alias DJAWADI or LADJEVARDI), a Affairs received a number of telegrams from Tehran high government official at the central information threatening the kidnapping of Austrians in Iran as a way bureau, in charge of the secret service forthe Western of retaliating, among other forms of terrorism. Azerbaidjan region (Kurdistan), second in charge in the Iranian delegation at the Vienna talks; Amir Mausur Amlr Mansour Borzorgian was Immediately arrested BOlORGIAN, officially SAHAROUDl's body guard. but released 24 hours later. The police did not have any truely valid reasons for retaining him. Borzorgian took Hadji Mustafawi disappeared immediately following refuge in the Iranian Embassy. categorically refusing to the attack. He was momentarily seen near Sahraroudi, put himself atthedispositlon of the authorities in charge who was in the street, hurt. He then disappeared on a of the inquest. Indignant, the police restated their Suzuki motorcycle for which the papers and rear-view demands; a warrant for Borzorgian's arrest was sent mirror were later found in a garbage can in close out for «failure to render assistance to a person in proximity to the site of the crime, along with the wea- danger». In orderfor hlmto agree to leave the Embas- pons used in the attack and a parka spattered With sy, Mr. Foregger, MInister of Justice, was asked by blood - all in a plastic bag. Proof of Moustafawi using Tehran to release the suspect following his interroga- the motorcycle is insufficient, we are told. Somebody tion; an incident which caused great unrest in Vienna else might well have used the motorcycle. Later, and Yielded no tangible results ... And yet, Borzor- Moustafawi took a taxi. The driver of the taxi was able gian's behaVior merits the most attention. He swears to to recognise him from a photo. He remembered this know nothing about the crime, saying that he left the INFORMATION AND UAISON BULLETIN 3 building to go down and buy some food. Nobody In the dl for a few minutes, going away in the direction of a shops In that neighborhood remembers his face. From neighboring park returned. Sahraroudl took out some his side, Sahraroudi denies that Bozorglan ever left.. documents and 9,000 American dollars from his poc- . At 7:30 In the evening, F. Rassoul's brother-in-law ket. The envelope was given back to Its owner by the received a phone call from Bozorglan announcing that Austrian authorities at the time of his departure for something terrible had happened: that F. Rassoul was Tehran. We conclude, finally, that Borzorglan had not dead. Borzorglan affirms having discovered Sahrarou- participated Inthe talks In December/January 1988, but dl hurt on the sidewalk. Although, he then left Sahrarou- that he was nevertheless in Vienna during this period. ATTITUDE OF THE AUSTRIAN GOVERNMENT The least that one can say Is that the Austrian authori- sent out a warrant for the arrest of the three Iranians ties have not acted with the promptness and firmness who, aftertheircrime, were reintergrated into the killing necessary to shed light on this horrible attack and bring machine of the Islamic Repubic. What were the rea- its authors to justice. Nevertheless, the police were sons given by the state? It has been said that Iran easily able to apprehend two of the three members of threatened attacks in Austria and kidnappings of Aus- the Iranian delegation: Amir Mansour Bozozrgian and trians in Lebanon and elsewhere. The Austrian press Mohammad Jafar Sahraroudi. The former was arres- also revealed a NORECOM affair being carried out, of ted at the place of the crime on Lindestrasse Street, the clandestine sale of arms to Iran for thousands of was released 24 hours later and took refuge in the Austrian schillings. It appears that an Iranian was the Iranian Embassy. The latter, injured by a stray bullet, principal negotiator of this illegal trafficking committed was able to fly peacefully to Tehran as early as July in Gulf War; Hadjl MOUSTAFANI, the brain behind a 22nd. That is to say, he was released five days after the commando of killers who assassinated A. R. Ghassem- first decisive findings from the balistic report, leaving Iou and hiS two companions. practically no doubt about the Iranian «emissaries' .. responsibility in this triple murder.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Hugh Seton-Watson, Nations and States (London, 1982), 5. 2. Ibid., 3. 3. Tom Nairn, The Break-up of Britain (London, 1977), 41–2. 4. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London, 1983), 15. 5. Ibid., 20. 6. Ibid. 7. Miroslav Hroch, ‘From National Movement to the Fully Formed Nation,’ New Left Review 198 (March/April 1993), 3–20. 8. Ibid., 6–7. 9. Ibid., 18. 10. Seton-Watson, Nations and States, 147–8. 11. Anderson, Imagined Communities, 127. 12. Ibid., 86. 13. Ibid., 102. 14. In the case of Iran, the Belgian constitution was the model for the Iranian constitution with two major adaptations to suit the country’s conditions. There were numerous references to religion and the importance of religious leaders. The constitution also made a point of recognizing the existence of the provincial councils. Ervand Abrahamian, Iran between Two Revolutions (Princeton, NJ, 1982), 90. 15. Peter Laslett, ‘Face-to-Face Society,’ in P. Laslett (ed.), Philosophy, Politics and Society (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967), 157–84. 16. Anderson, Imagined Communities, 122. 17. Arjun Appadurai, ‘Introduction, Commodities and the Politics of Value,’ in A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspec- tive (Cambridge, 1986), 3–63. 18. Ibid., 9. 19. Luca Anderlini and Hamid Sabourian, ‘Some Notes on the Economics of Barter, Money and Credit,’ in Caroline Humphrey and Stephen Hugh- Jones (eds), Barter, Exchange and Value (Cambridge, 1992), 75–106. 20. Ibid., 89. 21. The principal issue in the rise of Kurdish national awareness is the erosion in the fabric of the Kurdish ‘face-to-face’ society.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the IRAN-UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL the Hague
    BEFORE THE IRAN-UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL The Hague The Netherlands The Islamic Republic of Iran, Claimant, v. Claim No . A/30 United States of America, Full Tribunal Respondent. STATEMENT OF DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES Sean D . Murphy Agent of the United States Counsel: Michael J . Matheson Jeffrey D . Kovar BEFORE THE IRAN-UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL The Hague The Netherlands The Islamic Republic of Iran, Claimant, v. Claim No . A/30 United States of America, Full Tribunal Respondent. STATEMENT OF DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES On August 12, 1996, the Islamic Republic of Iran filed a Statement of Claim (Doc . 1) in a new interpretive dispute against the United States, Case No . A/30, alleging that the United States has violated its commitments under the Algiers Accords by interfering in Iran's internal affairs and implementing economic sanctions against Iran . Pursuant to the Tribunal's Order of August 21, 1996 (Doc . 3), and subsequent extension orders (Docs. 5, 9, and 12), the United States submits this Statement of 1 Defense. 1 In the event the Tribunal permits Iran to file further written statements or other materials in this case (Rules of Procedure, Art . 22-23), the United States requests that the Tribunal accord it the right to respond thereto . - 2 ­ I . INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY The Government of Iran, which has a long record of using terrorism and lethal force as an instrument of state policy, is seeking a ruling from the Tribunal that the United States has violated the Algiers Accords by intervening in Iran's internal affairs and enacting economic sanctions against it .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Factional Rivalries and Iran-European Union Relations | 187
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The Iranian political elite, state and society relations, and foreign relations since the Islamic revolution Rakel, E.P. Publication date 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Rakel, E. P. (2008). The Iranian political elite, state and society relations, and foreign relations since the Islamic revolution. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:29 Sep 2021 Chapter 6 Factional Rivalries and Iran-European Union Relations | 187 Chapter 6 Factional Rivalries and Iran-European Union Relations 6.1 Introduction Chapter 6 and 7 discuss the relations between Iran and the EU158 since the Iranian Islamic revolution until 2007. Chapter 6 focuses on the foreign policy of the IRI towards the EU and its main member countries that are the EU countries with the most diplomatic and economic ties to Iran (Britain, France, Germany, and Italy).
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Development of the Kurds in Iran: Pastoral Nationalism/ Farideh Koohi-Kamali
    The Political Development of the Kurds in Iran Pastoral Nationalism Farideh Koohi-Kamali The Political Development of the Kurds in Iran This page intentionally left blank The Political Development of the Kurds in Iran Pastoral Nationalism Farideh Koohi-Kamali Department of Social Sciences, New School University, New York Q Farideh Koohi-Kamali 2003 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted her right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2003 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. MacmillanT is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 0–333–73169–7 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdish National Congress of North America P.O. Box 90823, Nashville, TN 37209-USA
    Kurdish National Congress of North America P.O. Box 90823, Nashville, TN 37209-USA www.kncna.org Ms. Maria Fekter Federal Minister of Interior Affairs Herrengasse 7 1010 Vienna, Austria July 2, 2009 Dear Madam Fekter: New information revealed by the Green Party Security Spokesman Mr. Peter Pilz identified Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, now president of Iran, as one of the members of a death squad who murdered the top Kurdish leader Dr. Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou (the secretary general of the Kurdistan Democratic Party-Iran), his deputy Abdullah Ghaderi- Azar and a companion Dr. Fadel Rasoul on July 13, 1989 in Vienna. The Kurdish leaders were engaged in negotiation to discuss a peaceful solution to the Kurdish issue in Iran at the time of their murders. Contrary to the Kurdish intention to find a peaceful solution and promote democracy in Iran, the Iranian delegation used this negotiation as an opportunity to murder three men who were acting in good faith, and to liquidate any chance for peace in Iran. Despite the overwhelming evidence available at the time of the murders, under the pressure of the Iranian government, Austrian authorities let the murderers go free. We hope this time, with the new information that points to Ahmadinejad as one of the murderers, the Austrian government will do its due diligence to make sure that justice is served. If every time a death squad from a so-called ‘friendly country’ murders a political leader in Austria – a political leader who is struggling for peace and justice for his people -- and the crime goes unpunished, it diminishes the moral standing of the Austrian government.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Kurdistan? Class Politics and Kurdish Nationalism in the Middle East, 1918-2018
    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Whose Kurdistan? Class Politics and Kurdish Nationalism in the Middle East, 1918-2018 Nicola Degli Esposti A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. London, 13 September 2020 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 98,640 words. 2 Abstract This thesis is a study of the different trajectories of Kurdish nationalism in the Middle East. In the late 2010s – years of momentous advance for Kurdish forces in Turkey, Iraq, and Syria – Kurdish politics was deeply divided into competing movements pursuing irreconcilable projects for the future of the Kurdish nation. By investigating nationalism as embedded in social conflicts, this thesis identifies in the class basis of Kurdish movements and parties the main reason for their political differentiation and the development of competing national projects. After the defeat of the early Kurdish revolts in the 1920s and 1930s, Kurdish nationalism in Iraq and Turkey diverged along ideological lines due to the different social actors that led the respective national movements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enemy of My Enemy the Soviet Union, East Germany, and the Iranian Tudeh Party’S Support for Ayatollah Khomeini
    The Enemy of My Enemy The Soviet Union, East Germany, and the Iranian Tudeh Party’s Support for Ayatollah Khomeini ✣ Jeremy Friedman The Iranian revolution raises two key questions for scholars, just as it did for contemporaries: Why did the Shah fall, and why was he ultimately replaced by a theocratic regime that has proven to be remarkably resilient? The second outcome was not an automatic result of the first. The coalition that brought down the Shah ran the gamut from Maoist guerillas to secular and religious liberals to Islamists of various stripes and, perhaps most importantly, rested on a mass base without any explicit political commitments beyond the removal of the Shah. In February 1979 the best-organized armed forces belonged to the Marxist Fadaiyan, which launched a guerrilla struggle against the Pahlavi regime with an attack on the Siyakhal barracks in 1971, and the Islamic Left- ist Mujahidin, which began as a militant offshoot of the Liberation Move- ment of Iran.1 Liberals of various stripes, including the Freedom Movement led by post-revolutionary Iran’s first prime minister, Mehdi Bazargan, and the National Front led by Karim Sanjabi, were best positioned in terms of tech- nocratic skill and international legitimacy, and as a result were initially given the formal levers of power. Meanwhile, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s con- ception of the Velayat-e-Faqih, or “Guardianship of the Jurist,” was opposed by many senior clerics, including some, like Ayatollah Mohammad Kazem Shariatmadari, who rivaled him in prestige and influence.2 Some scholars have 1. See Ervand Abrahamian, The Iranian Mojahedin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Support of Ethnic Violent Groups by Co-Ethnic Groups
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Political Science Theses Department of Political Science Summer 8-2012 Patterns of Support of Ethnic Violent Groups by Co-Ethnic Groups Deniz Gumustekin Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_theses Recommended Citation Gumustekin, Deniz, "Patterns of Support of Ethnic Violent Groups by Co-Ethnic Groups." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2012. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_theses/53 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Political Science at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PATTERNS OF SUPPORT OF ETHNIC VIOLENT GROUPS BY CO-ETHNIC GROUPS by DENIZ GUMUSTEKIN Under the direction of Dr. Michael Herb ABSTRACT Most studies examine how homeland policies influence the host state and what role the homeland plays for diaspora. In this paper, I will examine the reasons and conditions for why ethnic groups do or do not support violent ethnic groups. This study tests how external threats impact the level of support within the same ethnic groups. I will examine the causal relationship between external pressure and non-cooperation through a structured, comparative study of Kurdish ethnic groups. INDEX WORDS: Cooperation, Group cooperation, Ethnic war, Ethnic secessionist
    [Show full text]
  • Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou (December 22, 1930 – July 13, 1989) 1
    Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou (December 22, 1930 – July 13, 1989) 1 Kurdish political leader Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou (December 22, 1930 – July 13, 1989) Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP-IRAN) Abroad Committee Media Centre www.kdppress.org Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP-IRAN) Abroad Committee Media Centre www.kdppress.org Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou 2 (December 22, 1930 – July 13, 1989) Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou ,عەبدولڕەحامن قاسملوو :Kurdish) Ebdurehman Qasimlú) (December 22, 1930 – July 13, 1989) was a Kurdish political leader. Ghassemlou was the leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) Partiya/حیزبی دیموکڕاتی کوردستان - حدک) Demokrata Kurdistana - PDK) from 1973 to 1989, when he was killed by individuals thought to be agents of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Arly and private life Born in Urmia, West Azarbaijan, Iran, Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou was instructed in a Quranic school. He was the son of Mohammad Vesugh, a wealthy landowning Kurdish Ahga. Ghassemlou started his university studies in France, and pursued them in Czechoslovakia, where he met his wife Helen Krulich. They had two daughters together, Mina (1953) and Hewa (1955). He was fluent in 8 languages including his mother tongue. He could read and write and speak and understand Kurdish, Kurmanji Kurdish, Persian, Arabic, Azerbaijani, French, English, Czech, Russian, and was familiar with German andSlovakian. Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP-IRAN) Abroad Committee Media Centre www.kdppress.org Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou (December 22, 1930 – July 13, 1989) 3 Political life Ghassemlou went back to Kurdistan in 1952, after completing his studies. He then spent several years as an active militant in the Kurdish political field. In 1973, during the Third Congress of the PDKI, he was elected to the position of Secretary General of the party, a position to which he was re-elected several times until his assassination.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdistan Democratic Party
    On the occasion of the 31st anniversary of the martyrs of Vienna - 1989 MAN of PEACE and DIALOGUE The life and death of Dr. Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou (1930-1989) Kurdistan Democratic Party - Iran Abroad Committee Media Centre 13 July 2020 This booklet has been prepared by Kurdistan Democratic Party (Abroad Committee Media Centre) to commemorate the 31st anniversary of the assassination of Dr. A.R. Ghassemlou, the Secretary General of Kurdistan Democratic Party-Iran, who was assassinated by the Iranian regime in Vienna on 13th of July 1989 while negotiating with the Iranian “terrorist-diplomats” to reach a peace agreement regarding the Kurdish Issue in Iran. Kurdistan Democratic Party - Iran Abroad Committee Media Centre 13 July 2020 On the occasion of the 31st anniversary of the martyrs of Vienna - 1989 MAN of PEACE and DIALOGUE The life and death of Dr. Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou (1930-1989) About us: www.kdppress.org twitter.com/KDPPRESS www.facebook.com/KDP.OFFICIAL.PAGE www.youtube.com/KDPPRESS www.flickr.com/KURDISTAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY [email protected] graphic by morad bahramian morad by graphic Abdul Rahman GHASSEMLOU MAN of PEACE and DIALOGUE The life and death of Dr. Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou (1930-1989) MAN of PEACE and DIALOGUE The Attainment of national Kurdish rights within a federal democratic Iran. Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou, the Secretary-General of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP- Iran), was born on 22 December 1930 in Ourmiah, Kurdistan. He went to university in Paris and later Czechoslovakia, had a Doctorate in economics and was an associate professor, having taught in Prague and Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Options of the Kurds. Part II: Historical Background
    Advances in Anthropology, 2018, 8, 235-272 http://www.scirp.org/journal/aa ISSN Online: 2163-9361 ISSN Print: 2163-9353 Future Options of the Kurds. Part II: Historical Background Ferdinand Hennerbichler Department of History, College of Humanities, University of Sulaimani (UoS), Sulaymaniyah, Iraq How to cite this paper: Hennerbichler, F. Abstract (2018). Future Options of the Kurds. Part II: Historical Background. Advances in Anth- The following second part of our analysis provides historical background in- ropology, 8, 235-272. formation in order to better understand future options of the Kurds. We ex- https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2018.83010 plain here in some detail why so far in contemporary history, virtually all ef- forts failed to achieve legitimate national rights for the Kurds and why they Received: July 30, 2018 Accepted: August 27, 2018 could and should not be repeated in the future. We basically show in sketched Published: August 30, 2018 small historical chapters that Kurds to date could only win limited national rights, like some forms of autonomous regional self-rule. The reasons for that Copyright © 2018 by author and are in many aspects. Firstly, because they were used over centuries both by Scientific Research Publishing Inc. dominant central as well as foreign powers as proxies for their interests and This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International also cooperated with them for own split aims. Second, because Kurds are License (CC BY 4.0). chronically divided, constantly at loggerheads, disunited (Sheikhmous, 1992 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ & 2013: “united in disunity”) and fragmented.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranianian Influence and Assassinations in the Kurdistan Regional Government
    MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Iranianian Influence and Assassinations in the Kurdistan Regional Government OE Watch Commentary: According to the accompanying article “Iran… whose influence has increased after the excerpted from the Turkish daily Karar, Iran has gradually increased its presence and influence in the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) referendum has been plotting assassinations and following the Kurdish independence referendum and has increased the attack against Iranian Kurdish leaders in Erbil. number of assassinations against the Kurdistan Democratic Party ” of Iran’s (KDPI) leaders based in the region. The article mentions a Source: Bekir Aydogan and Mehmet Alaca, “İran’ın Suikast bit of the history and it is worth remembering that the KDPI waged Politikası Altında Kürtler” (Kurds Under Iran’s Assassination a bloody conflict in the 1980s against the Iranian regime. When the Policy),” Karar, 28 April 2018. http://www.karar.com/gorusler/ Kurds of Iraq gained autonomy in 1991, it enabled the KDPI to set up iranin-suikast-politikasi-altinda-kurtler-833949# bases in the new autonomous region. From the 1990s until early 2015, Iranian Kurdish forces stationed in the Kurdish region refrained from After the independence referendum of the Iraqi Kurdistan Regional launching attacks on Iran in consideration of the interests of the KRG. Government (KRG), Iran has been increasing its influence within However, as the KRG gained more confidence over their fight against KRG borders, supporting Iraq’s sanctions against the KRG ISIS, they relaxed their grip on the KDPI to deploy their Peshmergas and taking control of a significant part of Kirkuk and disputed to border areas where they engaged in fighting Iranian border guards territories.
    [Show full text]