DOCSLIB.ORG

CS-21-04 -Whereas Motion- Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CS-21-04 -Whereas Motion- Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Item: CS-21-04 Community Services Committee – January 18, 2021 Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park The Community Services Committee recommends to City Council: Whereas on January 25, 2019, Council approved Capital Project 19510104 – Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Redevelopment, formally the Harbour Park Master Plan, in the amount of $540,000 to develop a vision for, and determine the appropriate uses of the Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park, including evaluating the feasibility and design for developing a boat launch on a portion of the parkland; and, Whereas on March 18, 2019, Report CS-19-23 was approved by Council setting out the Terms of Reference for a consulting firm to prepare a Feasibility Study for the site, including the feasibility and detailed design of a public boat launch; and, Whereas Purchasing Services issued Request of Proposal C2019-048 for the provision of the Harbour Lands Feasibility Study; and, Whereas on June 24, 2019 Council approved a contract award for Brook McIlroy in the amount of $313,396, excluding H.S.T., detailed in Report FIN-19-56, to undertake the study; and, Whereas Brook McIlroy prepared a Background Report as a component of the scope of work, which provides an overview of potential options and next steps for the Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park, in consideration of existing site constraints and opportunities; and, Whereas preliminary concept plans were developed which took into consideration the spatial constraints of environmental soils capping and the flood plain, and provide high- level recommendations for passive recreational uses, natural areas, and a potential boat launch location; and, Whereas the Background Report identifies that further work could not proceed regarding opportunities for a public boat launch or shoreline works in the absence of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment; and, Whereas the Background Report also identifies that basic parkland development can proceed in the absence of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, and, Whereas Report CS-20-65 concerning the Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Feasibility Study Update was presented to Community Services Committee on November 16, 2020; and, Whereas Report CS-20-65, dated November 12, 2020, recommended that the City advance the appropriate Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process as 4 additional work related to the future boat launch, shoreline remediation, and park development (Attachment 1); and, Whereas on November 16, 2020, Community Services Committee deferred Report CS- 20-65 concerning the Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Feasibility Study Update until December 7, 2020 or until City Council has dealt with the 2021 Capital Budget; and, Whereas Council approved, as part of the 2021 budget process, a funding strategy to advance only the basic parkland development for the Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park at this time; and, Whereas additional consulting services would be required for the detailed design of basic parkland and stakeholder consultation; and, Whereas the existing scope of work outlined in the Terms of Reference for the Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Master Plan Study, approved by Council on March 18, 2019, will require amendment to undertake basic parkland development only; and, Whereas in order to expedite the parkland development based on the funding strategy approved by Council, staff have advanced the Request for Proposals process to retain a consultant to implement the amended Terms of Reference for basic parkland development (Attachment 2); and, Whereas, Finance Services advises there is uncommitted funds in the amount of $204,467 remaining in Project 19510104 Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Redevelopment and, Therefore be it resolved: 1. That Capital Project 19510104 be amended to advance only basic parkland development at this time, and defer the boat launch component to a future phase; and, 2. That Council approve the amended Terms of Reference to advance the detailed design for only the basic parkland development and stakeholder consultation as set out in Attachment 2 to said Report; and, 3. That the contract with Brook McIlroy be terminated due to substantial change in the scope of the project. 5 CS-21-04 Attachment 1 Public Report To: Community Services Committee From: Ron Diskey, Commissioner, Community Services Department Report Number: CS-20-65 Date of Report: November 12, 2020 Date of Meeting: November 16, 2020 Subject: Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Feasibility Study - Update File: F-6105 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this report is to: 1. Provide Council with an update on the Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Feasibility Study; and, 2. Recommend that the City advance the appropriate Municipal Class Environmental Assessment as additional work related to the future boat launch, shoreline remediation, and park development. 2.0 Executive Summary N/A 3.0 Recommendation That the Community Services Committee recommend to City Council: 1. That, based on Report CS-20-65 dated November 12, 2020, staff advance the process to retain a consultant to undertake the appropriate Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for a boat launch, shoreline remediation, and park development; and, 2. That, based on Report CS-20-65 dated November 12, 2020, an additional $291,155, exclusive of H.S.T., be allocated to capital project 51-0104 Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park for the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, to be funded from the Parks, Recreation and Trails Development Charge and Harbour Rehabilitation and Improvement reserves; and, 3. That, based on Report CS-20-65 dated November 12, 2020, an amended Terms of Reference to undertake the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment and 6 Report to Community Services Committee Item: CS-20-65 Meeting Date: November 16, 2020 Page 2 required supporting studies be developed to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Community Services, and issued through a competitive Request for Proposal process; and, 4. That, based on Report CS-20-65 dated November 12, 2020, the contract with Brook McIlroy be terminated, due to substantial change and additional work required by the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. 4.0 Input From Other Sources • Development Services o Planning Services • Finance Services o Purchasing Services o Financial Reporting & Planning • Community Services o Parks Planning and Development • C.L.O.C.A. 5.0 Analysis 5.1 Background The Ed Broadbent Waterfront Park Feasibility Study (the Study) was initiated in 2019 to develop a vision for, and determine the appropriate uses of, a 14.3 hectare waterfront parcel of land (the Site) situated on the south east corner of Simcoe Street South and Harbour Road (refer to Figure 1 of Attachment 2), including evaluating the feasibility and design for developing a boat launch on a portion of the Site. On March 18, 2019, Report CS-19-23 (Attachment 1) was approved by Council setting out the Terms of Reference for a consulting firm to prepare a Feasibility Study for the site, including opportunities to provide a public boat launch. Subsequently, Purchasing Services issued Request for Proposal (R.F.P.) C2019-048 for the provision of Harbour Lands Feasibility Study and on June 24, 2019, Council approved a contract award for Brook McIlroy in the amount of $313,396, excluding all taxes, detailed in Report FIN19-56. 5.2 Background Report by Brook McIlroy A Background Report (Attachment 2) was prepared which provides an overview of the initial background research, shoreline surveys, constraints and opportunities, and provides an overview of options and next steps based on these initial findings. It was identified that further work could not proceed regarding opportunities for a public boat launch in the absence of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (E.A.). Accordingly, the Background Report explores scenarios for the future of the Site in relation to the requirements for an E.A., and summarized below. 7 Report to Community Services Committee Item: CS-20-65 Meeting Date: November 16, 2020 Page 3 The Site is near a number of the City’s recreational and natural heritage assets, including Lakeview Park and the Oshawa Creek valley system to the west, and the Second Marsh Wildlife area to the east. The site also lies near the Port of Oshawa, which is an active industrial area managed by the federal government via the Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority. To date, the City has undertaken extensive work in order to ensure that the site meets the minimum requirements for parkland as set by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (M.E.C.P.). Currently, several options are available to the City in order to develop the site as a parkland asset that complements the larger parks and open space system. Initial analysis of the Site included a review of the following topics, which are described in further detail in Section 2.0 of the Background Report (Attachment 2): • Site History; • Works and studies undertaken from 2012-Present Day; • Natural Heritage System and floodplain considerations; • Existing shoreline conditions; and, • Environmental Assessment (E.A.) Requirements. As a new piece of parkland in the City’s inventory there are opportunities for the City to develop a waterfront park that serves an important role in the City’s urban fabric. These opportunities include creating a signature four-season park on the waterfront; developing an ecologically productive, sustainable, and resilient park; and creating a destination that celebrates Oshawa’s past, present, and future. Following the initial analysis and evaluation of opportunities, preliminary concept plans were developed which take into consideration the spatial constraints of environmental soil capping and the flood plain, and provide high-level recommendations for passive recreational uses, natural areas, and a potential boat launch location. These preliminary concept plans, as well as considerations for E.A. requirements, informed the development of a series of options for the Site: Option A: Shoreline remediation to mitigate risk As identified in the Background Report, areas of the existing shoreline are moderately to severely degraded, and are not likely suitable for safe public access in their current state.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C
    Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C. Dewar Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d'études canadiennes, Volume 53, Number/numéro 1, Winter/hiver 2019, pp. 178-196 (Article) Published by University of Toronto Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/719555 Access provided by Mount Saint Vincent University (19 Mar 2019 13:29 GMT) Journal of Canadian Studies • Revue d’études canadiennes Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent KENNETH C. DEWAR Abstract: This article argues that the lines separating different modes of thought on the centre-left of the political spectrum—liberalism, social democracy, and socialism, broadly speaking—are permeable, and that they share many features in common. The example of Tom Kent illustrates the argument. A leading adviser to Lester B. Pearson and the Liberal Party from the late 1950s to the early 1970s, Kent argued for expanding social security in a way that had a number of affinities with social democracy. In his paper for the Study Conference on National Problems in 1960, where he set out his philosophy of social security, and in his actions as an adviser to the Pearson government, he supported social assis- tance, universal contributory pensions, and national, comprehensive medical insurance. In close asso- ciation with his philosophy, he also believed that political parties were instruments of policy-making. Keywords: political ideas, Canada, twentieth century, liberalism, social democracy Résumé : Cet article soutient que les lignes séparant les différents modes de pensée du centre gauche de l’éventail politique — libéralisme, social-démocratie et socialisme, généralement parlant — sont perméables et qu’ils partagent de nombreuses caractéristiques.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Times, Health Policy Review, 17NOV2014
    TWENTY-FIFTH YEAR, NO. 1260 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2014 $4.00 HEARD ON THE HILL BUZZ NEWS HARASSMENT Artist paints Queen, other prominent MPs like ‘kings, queens in their people, wants a national portrait gallery little domains,’ contribute to ‘culture of silence’: Clancy BY LAURA RYCKEWAERT “The combination of power and testosterone often leads, unfortu- n arm’s-length process needs nately, to poor judgment, especially Ato be established to deal in a system where there has been with allegations of misconduct no real process to date,” said Nancy or harassment—sexual and Peckford, executive director of otherwise—on Parliament Hill, Equal Voice Canada, a multi-par- say experts, as the culture on tisan organization focused on the Hill is more conducive to getting more women elected. inappropriate behaviour than the average workplace. Continued on page 14 NEWS HARASSMENT Campbell, Proctor call on two unnamed NDP harassment victims to speak up publicly BY ABBAS RANA Liberal Senator and a former A NDP MP say the two un- identifi ed NDP MPs who have You don’t say: Queen Elizabeth, oil on canvas, by artist Lorena Ziraldo. Ms. Ziraldo said she got fed up that Ottawa doesn’t have accused two now-suspended a national portrait gallery, so started her own, kind of, or at least until Nov. 22. Read HOH p. 2. Photograph courtesy of Lorena Ziraldo Liberal MPs of “serious person- al misconduct” should identify themselves publicly and share their experiences with Canadians, NEWS LEGISLATION arguing that it is not only a ques- tion of fairness, but would also be returns on Monday, as the race helpful to address the issue in a Feds to push ahead on begins to move bills through the transparent fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The August 2015 Issue of Inside Policy
    AUGUST 2015 A politician of the Old School Irwin Cotler leaves Parliament with a legacy of pursuing justice The Election Issue INSIDE: Democratic reform: Reviving Five ideas for A new government Solution or more medicare as an transforming needs to tackle problems? election issue Aboriginal affairs Canada Post PublishedPublished by by the the Macdonald-Laurier Macdonald-Laurier Institute Institute PublishedBrianBrian Lee Lee Crowley, byCrowley, the Managing Macdonald-LaurierManaging Director,Director, [email protected] [email protected] Institute David Watson,JamesJames Anderson,Managing Anderson, Editor ManagingManaging and Editor, Editor,Communications Inside Inside Policy Policy Director Brian Lee Crowley, Managing Director, [email protected] James Anderson,ContributingContributing Managing writers:writers: Editor, Inside Policy Past contributors ThomasThomas S. AxworthyS. Axworthy ContributingAndrewAndrew Griffith writers: BenjaminBenjamin Perrin Perrin Thomas S. AxworthyDonald Barry Laura Dawson Stanley H. HarttCarin Holroyd Mike Priaro Peggy Nash DonaldThomas Barry S. Axworthy StanleyAndrew H. GriffithHartt BenjaminMike PriaroPerrin Mary-Jane Bennett Elaine Depow Dean Karalekas Linda Nazareth KenDonald Coates Barry PaulStanley Kennedy H. Hartt ColinMike Robertson Priaro Carolyn BennettKen Coates Jeremy Depow Paul KennedyPaul Kennedy Colin RobertsonGeoff Norquay Massimo Bergamini Peter DeVries Tasha Kheiriddin Benjamin Perrin Brian KenLee Crowley Coates AudreyPaul LaporteKennedy RogerColin Robinson Robertson Ken BoessenkoolBrian Lee Crowley Brian
    [Show full text]
  • CBC Nir May 12.Indd
    THE NDP CHOOSES A NEW LEADER Introduction On March 24, 2012, the members of the only in 2007 that he joined the NDP, Focus federal New Democratic Party chose recruited specifically by Jack Layton to This News in Review story examines the Thomas Mulcair as their new leader. be his Quebec lieutenant. rise of Thomas Mulcair Mulcair took control at an extraordinary Mulcair served Layton well, winning a to the leadership of time. It was less than one year since the seat in a 2007 by-election and becoming the New Democratic NDP had celebrated its best-ever election the architect of the NDP’s 59-seat victory Party (NDP) and how results, winning 102 seats and assuming in Quebec in the 2011 federal election. the NDP is changing the role of Official Opposition. And it In his campaign, Mulcair called for the under Mulcair. We also was only eight months after the death of party to modernize its language and consider the possibility that the rise of the Jack Layton, the NDP’s beloved leader approach to voters. His essential message NDP might result who had led the party to that historic was that the party could not win power in a new political election victory. without changing the way it campaigned. dynamic in the The leadership race was a contest “We did get 4.5 million votes but we ongoing competition between two factions within the NDP: are still far from being able to form a between progressives representatives of the party’s old guard, government,” he argued.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pain Society Conference May 23 – 26, 2007, Ottawa, Ontario
    CPS_Abstracts_2007.qxd 27/04/2007 11:43 AM Page 107 ABSTRACTS Canadian Pain Society Conference May 23 – 26, 2007, Ottawa, Ontario COMMUNITY PUBLIC EVENT 8:45 AM – SESSION 101 WEDNESDAY MAY 23, 2007 3 THE NATURE AND NURTURE OF PAIN 6:30 PM – PAIN RELIEF – A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT UNDERSTANDING THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND THE 7:15 PM – PAIN MANAGEMENT AND REGULATORS IMPORTANCE OF GENETICS AND ENVIRONMENT Chair: Ellen Thompson MB BS FRCPC Assistant Professor, University of Ottawa, Department of 1 Anaesthesiology, the Ottawa Hospital, CPM Chronic Pain Chair: David Mann C Eng FIET Management, Ottawa, Ontario, Local Arrangements Committee President FM-CFS Canada, Ottawa, Ontario Chair, 2007 Speakers: Hon Ed Broadbent PhD PC CC, Rocco Gerace MD Speakers: Allan Basbaum PhD FRS Chair, Department of Anatomy, Registrar W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Conference delegates, pain patients and their University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California families and friends are invited, as well as the physicians caring for them. Jeffrey S Mogil PhD, Department of Psychology and Centre for We extend a particular invitation to physicians who have had concerns Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec about the CPSO and regulatory impact on prescribing pain medications. 1A 8:45 AM – SESSION 102 PAIN RELIEF – A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT Hon Ed Broadbent PhD PC CC 4 Former Leader of the New Democratic Party of Canada, Founding President of the International Centre for Human Rights and TRENDS IN OPIOID RELATED
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents RE-INVENTING THE LEFT IN CANADA Introduction........................................................................................................ 31 A Party in Crisis?..................................................................................................33 The Informed Viewer ..........................................................................................34 Canadian Social Democratic Movement Overview ..............................................35 Fortune and Men’s Eyes ...................................................................................... 39 Discussion, Research, and Essay Questions ..........................................................43 RE-INVENTING THE LEFT IN CANADA Introduction After a disappointing showing in the Novem- deficits, there is increased public support for ber 2000 federal election, its third since a halt to further cuts to spending in educa- 1993, the federal New Democratic Party tion, health, and social programs, and a faces serious challenges as it contemplates its reinvestment of tax revenues into these vital political future. Under the leadership of areas. Alexa McDonough, the NDP’s campaign Such trends should offer a promising focused directly on what all the opinion polls environment for the NDP and its social indicated was the primary concern of Cana- reform message, yet in three successive dians: the preservation of the country’s federal elections the party has been relegated publicly funded health-care system. Despite to an increasingly marginal position in the NDP’s often-repeated claims that as the Canadian federal politics. In fact, during the party responsible for introducing medicare in last campaign most media coverage was Canada it could best be counted on to defend devoted to what were viewed as the only two the system from further cuts, only eight per parties that could realistically claim to be cent those who voted in the election gave it serious contenders for power—the Liberals their support. The NDP’s total representation and the Canadian Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining Constituency Work for Local Democratic Engagement
    SAMARA’S MP EXIT INTERVIEWS: VOLUME II Beyond the Barbecue Reimagining constituency work for local democratic engagement REPORT ONE: MPs IN PARLIAMENT REPORT TWO: MPs IN THEIR CONSTITUENCY REPORT THREE: MPs IN THEIR POLITICAL PARTY One of the quintessential experiences of the Member of Parliament in their constituency is the summer barbecue circuit. MPs travel from community event to event, spatula in hand, in order to meet as many constituents as possible face-to-face. But are MPs and citizens really hearing each other? “At the end of it all, I really don’t know how to connect with the broad range of constituents. I door-knocked every Friday for four and a half years. I held town halls. I did my social media. I sent something in the neighbour- hood of six million pieces of literature. Really trying actively for engagement. I don’t know that there was any real uptake.” 2 Contents INTRODUCING SAMARA’S MP EXIT INTERVIEWS: VOLUME II 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 WHO PARTICIPATED? 8 INTRODUCTION 9 But that’s how it’s always been 10 The job description: MPs in the constituency 13 EVENTS: “THERE ARE A HUNDRED OR HUNDRED AND FIFTY CAN’T-MISS EVENTS” 11 “I’m here because you were smiling” 15 Those are not the people 16 CONSULTATIONS: “HOW MUCH ARE YOU GOING TO YELL AT ME TODAY?” 17 Mabel, he’s calling from Ottawa! 18 Feeling around in the dark 18 Technology will save us! 20 CASEWORK: “THERE’S A SERVICE CANADA DOWN THE ROAD” 21 Where the work is 22 Not created equal 23 Plugging holes in the dam 24 Missing the forest for the trees 26 CONCLUSION: DOING LOCAL DEMOCRATIC ENGAGEMENT BETTER 28 Step #1: Clear the casework from the constituency office 29 Step #2: Make MPs and their staff consultation experts 30 How to make it happen: Who does what? 32 METHODOLOGY 34 ENDNOTES 35 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 36 PARTICIPATING FORMER MPS 38 3 Introducing Samara’s MP Exit Interviews: Volume II Representative democracy is in trouble.
    [Show full text]
  • 33000 ONDP-Program.Indd
    A Celebration of Life Une célébration de la vie July 18, 1950 – August 22, 2011 18 juillet 1950 – 22 août 2011 “So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world.” « Mes amis, aimons, gardons espoir et restons optimistes. Et nous changerons le monde.» Th e Honourable | L’honorable Jack Layton, P.C., M.P. | C.P., député Saturday, August 27, 2011 – 2:00 p.m. Le samedi 27 août 2011 – 14 heures Roy Th omson Hall Salle Roy Th omson 60 Simcoe Street, Toronto, Ontario 60, rue Simcoe, Toronto, Ontario In Memoriam | En mémoire In lieu of owers, Jack Layton’s family has asked that we help carry on his legacy of building a better country with a donation to the Broadbent Institute. e Broadbent Institute’s mission is to develop and support social democratic principles and give people the tools they need to build a better, fairer Canada. rough progressive education and training, the Institute aims to promote social democracy in all levels of Canadian government. Au lieu d’envoyer des eurs, la famille de Jack Layton a demandé à ce que des dons soient faits à l’Institut Broadbent a n de poursuivre ses e­ orts pour bâtir un meilleur pays. La mission de l’Institut Broadbent est de soutenir et de faire progresser les principes de la démocratie sociale et de donner aux gens les outils dont ils ont besoin pour bâtir un meilleur Canada, un Canada plus équitable. À travers un programme d’éducation et de formation progressive, l’Institut cherche à promouvoir la démocratie sociale à tous les niveaux du gouvernement canadien.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY 2003 Graham Fraser
    THE NDP LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE—RE-CONNECTING THE LEFT TO THE MIDDLE In the run-up to the NDP leadership vote on January 25, party activists faced a difficult choice between two apparent front runners, the well known face of NDP House Leader Bill Blaikie of Manitoba, and Toronto city councillor Jack Layton, an interesting new face with national credentials as president of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. While Blaikie represents the party’s deep roots in the West and the co-operative movement, Layton represents the possibility of taking the NDP back into the cities and union towns of southern Ontario, where it was strong during the era of Ed Broadbent from 1975-1988, a highwater mark in NDP history. Toronto Star columnist Graham Fraser, widely acclaimed for his books on Canadian politics, offers this situational update on a party confronting an agonizing choice. Graham Fraser En prévision du scrutin à la direction du Nouveau Parti Démocratique du 25 janvier, les militants font face à un choix difficile entre les deux candidats les plus en vue : le Manitobain Bill Blaikie, leader du NPD à la Chambre des communes, et Jack Layton, conseiller municipal de la ville de Toronto et un temps président de la Fédération canadienne des municipalités. Un premier visage très connu, donc, et un second qui gagne à l’être. Si Blaikie représente le profond enracinement du parti dans l’Ouest du pays et le mouvement coopératif, Layton incarne pour sa part l’espoir de lui rendre la popularité dont il jouissait dans les grands centres et les villes ouvrières du sud de l’Ontario, où le NPD a connu une période historiquement fastueuse sous le règne d’Ed Broadbent, de 1975 à 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberal Third Option
    The Liberal Third Option: A Study of Policy Development A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fuliiment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Political Science University of Regina by Guy Marsden Regina, Saskatchewan September, 1997 Copyright 1997: G. W. Marsden 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON KI A ON4 Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada Your hie Votre rdtérence Our ME Notre référence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distibute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substanîial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. This study presents an analysis of the nationalist econornic policies enacted by the federal Liberal government during the 1970s and early 1980s. The Canada Development Corporation(CDC), the Foreign Investment Review Agency(FIRA), Petro- Canada(PetroCan) and the National Energy Prograrn(NEP), coliectively referred to as "The Third Option," aimed to reduce Canada's dependency on the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary Alexa Mcdonough
    Commentary Alexa McDonough Back in 1974 when Muriel Duckworth than men for why children get their homework ran for the Nova Scotia legislature, I was relatively done or not." new to the NDP [New Democratic Party]. This [I owe so much to] one woman wbo fought surprises some people because my parents went to a really hard over a long period of time to break CCF [Cooperative Commonwealth Federation, the down harriers, to build structures. Rosemary Brown federal predecessor of the NDP] convention on bad tbe guts to run for the fed eral leadership of the their honeymoon in 1939, setting a very definite NDP in 1975 and came in a strong second against pattern in their lives together. But I became rive other candidates. Tbat really changed people's inspired by the Trudeaumania of the late 60s. I perceptions about what is possible. Rosemary never actually joined the Liberal Party, but I Brown was a huge influence on my decision to run. worked for it. There was no electoral presence of She was pushing and pushing me to run federally the NDP in Nova Scotia at that time, federally or in 1979 and I said, "I can't do tbat, Rosemary; I provincially. I wrote the social policy platform for have two small children." She said, "That is not a tbe Liberal Party in Nova Scotia in 1970. By 1972, good enough excuse; I had three when I ran." I I had left the party in a rage, with two driving said, "I can't run against my husband's Tory law passions for the political pursuit of social justice: partner," and she said, "Why not? I ran against my women's employment opportunities and working husband's Liberal medical partner." I said, "I don't conditions, and childcare.
    [Show full text]