DOCSLIB.ORG

Perceived Partner Responsiveness Encourages Emotional Expression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perceived Partner Responsiveness Encourages Emotional Expression See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335196604 Can I tell you how I feel? Perceived partner responsiveness encourages emotional expression Article in Emotion · August 2019 DOI: 10.1037/emo0000650 CITATIONS READS 0 176 5 authors, including: Yan Ruan Harry Reis University of Rochester University of Rochester 3 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS 176 PUBLICATIONS 13,533 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Margaret S Clark Jennifer L. Hirsch Yale University Yale University 144 PUBLICATIONS 9,392 CITATIONS 6 PUBLICATIONS 50 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Are You into Me? Uncertainty and Sexual Desire in Online Encounters and Established Relationships View project Hook Up Motives View project All content following this page was uploaded by Yan Ruan on 18 November 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Emotion Can I Tell You How I Feel? Perceived Partner Responsiveness Encourages Emotional Expression Yan Ruan, Harry T. Reis, Margaret S. Clark, Jennifer L. Hirsch, and Brian D. Bink Online First Publication, August 15, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000650 CITATION Ruan, Y., Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., Hirsch, J. L., & Bink, B. D. (2019, August 15). Can I Tell You How I Feel? Perceived Partner Responsiveness Encourages Emotional Expression. Emotion. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000650 Emotion © 2019 American Psychological Association 2019, Vol. 1, No. 999, 000 1528-3542/19/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000650 Can I Tell You How I Feel? Perceived Partner Responsiveness Encourages Emotional Expression Yan Ruan and Harry T. Reis Margaret S. Clark, Jennifer L. Hirsch, and University of Rochester Brian D. Bink Yale University When do people express their emotions to other people and when do they choose not to do so? Emotional experience—positive or negative—often leads people to reveal their feelings to others, especially to close relationship partners. Although emotional expression has been incorporated into recent dyadic models of emotion regulation, little research has examined the specific interpersonal processes responsible for facilitating or inhibiting emotional expression. This article reports results from a pair of methodologically distinct studies examining the impact of perceived partner responsiveness (PPR) on emotional expression. The results of Study 1, a 2-week daily diary study, demonstrated that within-person variations in the perceived responsive- ness of a close partner were associated with corresponding day-to-day variations in emotional expression to that partner. In Study 2, in the context of a stressful situation, we manipulated perceptions of a romantic partner’s responsiveness and then measured emotion expression toward that partner. Higher levels of experimentally induced PPR causally led to greater expression of anxiety. Together, these studies identify PPR as an important interpersonal mechanism underlying emotional expression. Keywords: responsiveness, perceived partner responsiveness, emotional expression Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000650.supp Felt emotion is sometimes expressed to others; at other times, it ing one’s emotions for both nonexpressers and their partners (e.g., is not. Though researchers have previously explored individual English, John, Srivastava, & Gross, 2012; Peters, Overall, & differences in emotional openness (e.g., Gross, 1998), to date little Jamieson, 2014), people nonetheless do not always express their research has been reported on the conditions that determine when emotions, even to others with whom they are in close relationships people do and do not express the emotions they feel to others. In (e.g., English, Lee, John, & Gross, 2017; Richards, Butler, & this article, we describe a pair of methodologically distinct studies Gross, 2003). showing that relational context, specifically perceived partner re- Expressing emotion (or not) is generally conceptualized as a sponsiveness (PPR), guides people’s expression of both positive distinct emotion-regulation strategy used to modulate the trajec- and negative emotion to that partner. tory of the emotional experience, shaping both the intensity and duration of emotions (Brans, Koval, Verduyn, Lim, & Kuppens, When Do People Express Emotions? 2013; Gross & John, 2002; Verduyn, Van Mechelen, & Tuer- linckx, 2011). As such, these expressions of emotion, which may When people experience emotions—positive or negative—they reflect deliberate or automatic choices, may fulfill or thwart any of often describe them to other people, an action defined as emotional a diverse variety of affective goals, such as lessening unhappy expression. Considerable research suggests that doing so enhances feelings, eliminating a source of distress, or prolonging happy liking, intimacy, trust, and received support (Graham, Huang, feelings. Often, pursuit of these affective goals involves other This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its alliedClark, publishers. & Helgeson, 2008; Nils & Rimé, 2012), both in the moment people—for example, individuals regulating emotions often draw This article is intended solely for the personal use ofand the individual user and is not over to be disseminated broadly. the long term (Cameron & Overall, 2018). Despite the on other people as resources, to receive support or advice, to well-documented personal and interpersonal costs of not express- promote closeness, or to boost one’s image in the eyes of others (e.g., Fitzsimons, Finkel, & Vandellen, 2015; Kennedy-Moore & Watson, 2001; Orehek, Forest, & Barbaro, 2018; Rimé, 2007, 2009; Zaki & Williams, 2013). Although research has examined the effectiveness of certain specific interpersonal strategies in X Yan Ruan and X Harry T. Reis, Department of Clinical and Social achieving emotion-regulation goals (e.g., Cameron & Overall, Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester; X Margaret S. Clark, 2018; Thoits, 1984), relatively few researchers have looked at how X Jennifer L. Hirsch, and Brian D. Bink, Department of Psychology, relational context itself affects the initial decision to enact a Yale University. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Harry T. behavior central to most interpersonal strategies—that is, to ex- Reis, Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Univer- press (or not express) one’s emotion to others. As a step toward sity of Rochester, River Campus Box 270266, Rochester, NY 14627-0266. better integrating the emotion and relationship literatures, here, we E-mail: [email protected] examine how relational context influences emotional expression. 1 2 RUAN, REIS, CLARK, HIRSCH, AND BINK We suggest that the functional significance of emotional relying on the relationship and are more willing to self-disclose expression depends on the nature of the relationship between (McCarthy, Wood, & Holmes, 2017). In contrast, when the pos- the emotion-expresser and the recipient (Barasch, Levine, & sibility of nonresponsiveness or even exploitation becomes appre- Schweitzer, 2016; Clark & Taraban, 1991; Von Culin, Hirsch, ciable, self-protection goals (which often involve being emotion- & Clark, 2018). Emotions often convey critical information ally closed) become prominent. To the best of our knowledge, this about the self that requires people to balance the potential gains of model has not yet been tested in the specific case of expressing expression against the foreseeable risks in doing so. For example, emotions that arise in everyday life (as opposed to emotions expressions of anxiety and sadness reveal the person’s vulnerabil- triggered by the relationship itself). ities and dependencies to others (Clark & Taraban, 1991). Whereas Integrating the Gross (2015) and Murray et al. (2006) models is these expressions can lead to the receipt of social support (Clark, important for at least two reasons: (a) it identifies a conceptual Ouellette, Powell, & Milberg, 1987; Graham et al., 2008; Öhman bridge linking growing literatures in the subfields of emotion and & Mineka, 2001), they also can be exploited or ignored (Coyne & relationship science, and (b) it provides insight into a specific Whiffen, 1995), resulting in the psychological pain that accompanies relational process that underlies emotional expression. With regard such rejection (Eisenberger & Lieberman, 2004). Although there is to this latter point, Clark et al. (2001) speculated that people’s risk in revealing one’s vulnerabilities, emotional openness—that is, emotional openness should depend on their anticipating or per- the disclosure of the emotions that one is experiencing—is also central ceiving that partners will be responsive when they convey their to the development of intimacy, as the intimacy process model pro- emotional states. The two studies reported in this article test this poses (Reis & Shaver, 1988), and is therefore key to relationship specific and as yet untested hypothesis. development. Similarly, expressions of happiness can lead others to like us more (e.g., Clark & Taraban, 1991; Staw, Sutton, & Pelled, Perceived Partner Responsiveness Encourages 1994), to find us more attractive (Mueser, Grau, Sussman, & Emotional Expression Rosen, 1984), and to help us savor the moment (Gable, Reis, Impett, & Asher, 2004). Yet, expressions of happiness also can PPR refers to the belief
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I'm Sad You're Sad: Emotional Contagion In
    I’m Sad You’re Sad: Emotional Contagion in CMC Jeffrey T. Hancock,1,2 Kailyn Gee,2 Kevin Ciaccio2 & Jennifer Mae-Hwah Lin1 1Information Science 2Department of Communication Cornell University jth34, kg95, kac83, jml232 @cornell.edu ABSTRACT necessarily undermined in CMC. For example, in one An enduring assumption about computer-mediated study, participants were asked to act nicely or meanly to a communication is that it undermines emotional communication partner during a get to know you type task understanding. The present study examined emotional that took place either FtF or in CMC [11]. The results communication in CMC by inducing negative affect in one revealed that the partners could discern the likable and condition and neutral affect in another. The results revealed dislikable participants as accurately in the CMC condition that 1) participants experiencing negative affect produced as in the FtF condition. In a second study that more directly fewer words, used more sad terms, and exchanged examined emotional expression, participants acted either messages at a slower rate, 2) their partners were able to happy or sad while interacting with a partner through detect their partners emotional state, and 3) emotional Instant Messenger [7]. After the interaction, partners were contagion took place, in which partners interacting with easily able to determine whether their partner seemed happy participants in the negative affect condition had or sad. The study also provided some indications of how significantly less positive affect than partners in the control emotion is communicated through text: participants acting condition. These data support a relational view of CMC. sad used fewer words, agreed less with their partner, used Author Keywords less punctuation, and responded less quickly than Computer-mediated communication, Emotion, Affect participants acting happy (see also work by Gill et al, [4]).
    [Show full text]
  • Ekman, Emotional Expression, and the Art of Empirical Epiphany
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY Journal of Research in Personality 38 (2004) 37–44 www.elsevier.com/locate/jrp Ekman, emotional expression, and the art of empirical epiphany Dacher Keltner* Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, 3319 Tolman, 94720 Berkeley, CA, USA Introduction In the mid and late 1960s, Paul Ekman offered a variety of bold assertions, some seemingly more radical today than others (Ekman, 1984, 1992, 1993). Emotions are expressed in a limited number of particular facial expressions. These expressions are universal and evolved. Facial expressions of emotion are remarkably brief, typically lasting 1 to 5 s. And germane to the interests of the present article, these brief facial expressions of emotion reveal a great deal about peopleÕs lives. In the present article I will present evidence that supports this last notion ad- vanced by Ekman, that brief expressions of emotion reveal important things about the individualÕs life course. To do so I first theorize about how individual differences in emotion shape the life context. With this reasoning as backdrop, I then review four kinds of evidence that indicate that facial expression is revealing of the life that the individual has led and is likely to continue leading. Individual differences in emotion and the shaping of the life context People, as a function of their personality or psychological disorder, create the sit- uations in which they act (e.g., Buss, 1987). Individuals selectively attend to certain features of complex situations, thus endowing contexts with idiosyncratic meaning. Individuals evoke responses in others, thus shaping the shared, social meaning of the situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review: Is the Emotional Expression of Contempt
    Literature Review: Is the Emotional Expression of Contempt Recognized Universally or Culturally? Julianna Phoukhao University of California, Merced Keywords: Contempt, Facial Expression, Forced Choice, Freely Labeling, Universal, Cultural, Emotion. 1 Abstract The universal facial expression of contempt is often described as one lip corner raised and tightened. This literature reviews whether or not this expression is recognized universally. After examining theories and methods, low agreement of this expression recognized as contempt was found across cultures. Evidence so far is not sufficient enough to support the unilateral lip corner as an universal expression for contempt. The expression and recognition of contempt is highly dependent on culture and context. 2 Literature Review Contempt is an emotion described as annoyance (Alvarado, 1996), ignoring or belittling a person (Fischer & Roseman, 2007), and involving another person’s negative actions and feelings of superiority (Wagner, 2000). This emotion is usually initiated when one perceives the inability to change or correct another person’s behavior. The social function of contempt is to end a relationship through rejection and exclusion (Fischer & Roseman, 2007). The concept of emotions serving functions dates back to Darwin’s days (1876) when he proposed the physiological component and facial expressions of basic emotions as innate because they serve towards a goal in one’s environment. He used his observations of evolution as evidence of the universality of emotions. Ekman (1971) challenged Darwin’s theory by conducting his own research in a remote village of Papua New Guinea. Ekman discovered emotions as innate and recognizable through facial expression. His research has also suggested the universality of a contempt expression (Ekman, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Natural History of Emotions: Darwin's Legacy
    revista de historia de la psicología © 2009: Publicacions de la Universitat de València 2009,On the vol. natural 30, núm. history 2-3 (junio-septiembre) of emotions 161-168 Valencia (España). ISSN: 0211-0040161 On the natural history of emotions: Darwin’s legacy Paulo Jesus* Universidade Lusófono do Porto Abstract One of the most striking applications of Darwinian principles resides in the evolutionary account of expression of emotions. The main purpose of this paper is to ask some fundamental questions concerning this realm of Darwinian investigations and its implicit or explicit legacy in contem- porary psychology of emotions, which appears inhabited by the essential tension between the primacy of embodiment (from James to Damasio) and that of cognitive mediation (from Peirce to Lazarus). One should ask again: what is an emotion? Is it reducible to a bodily expression or is there any qualitative difference between emotion and expression? Why do emotions belong to the phenomena of life? How do the grammar of life and the grammar of culture interact in emotional expressions? What is the «truth» of Darwin’s principles on expressions and what degree of coherence can be detected when one attempts at integrating the theory of emotions in the larger picture of the evolution of life forms and cultural meaningful phenomena? Darwin is systematically attracted towards normative invariants, that is, nomological relation- ships and functions which organise a dynamic morphogenetic process. Thus, Darwin’s theory of expression of emotions identifies a set of three universal principles that complement each other. These comprise not only the notion of adaptive behaviour, association of learned habits and evolution of instinct, but also that of body structure (specially the web of muscles that define and constrain the landscape of the face), inheritance of movements and independent action of the nervous system.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Affective Characters in Creating an Emotionally Dynamic Interactive
    Factors of Emotion and Affect in Designing Interactive Virtual Characters Proceedings of the 2013 Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum Kellen Maicher Department of Design, The Ohio State University Introduction: The term affective may be defined as anything that expresses or elicits emotion, which itself is the complex psychophysiological state of mind involving physiological arousal, expressive behaviors, and conscious experience (Myers, 2004). Affect (the experience of feeling emotion) is one of the three components of modern psychology that includes the cognitive (processing) and conative (instinctive) (“Affect”, 2011). Emotions themselves are components of a larger categorical subset that includes affective concepts such as mood, attitude, personality, and the motive (Norman, 2004. pg 43). Cognitive scientist Marvin Lee Minsky suggests in his book The Emotion Machine that emotions are simply different ways of thinking and serve as unique problem-solving paradigms that allow us to learn more effectively (“The Emotion Machine”, 2010). There are many theories regarding the specific mechanisms and functions of affect and emotion, with research dating back at least as far as the philosophers of ancient Greece (William, 1884). Notable historical contributors include Rene Descartes (1641), Charles Darwin (1872), and more recently William James and Paul Ekman. Modern theories of emotion include a number of somatic, neurobiological, cognitive, and evolutionary models; most of which are fairly complex and overlapping. Although relevant and intriguing concepts, a comprehensive overview of these theories is beyond the scope and purpose of this paper. Instead, a focus on the implications and processes of emotion and affect as they relate to interactive character design will be explored.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling the Experience of Emotion
    Modeling the Experience of Emotion Joost Broekens Man‐Machine Interaction group Delft University of Technology [email protected] (Draft manuscript submitted to the first issue of the International Journal of Synthetic Emotions) Abstract Affective computing has proven to be a viable field of research comprised of a large number of multidisciplinary researchers resulting in work that is widely published. The majority of this work consists of computational models of emotion recognition, computational modeling of causal factors of emotion and emotion expression through rendered and robotic faces. A smaller part is concerned with modeling the effects of emotion, formal modeling of cognitive appraisal theory and models of emergent emotions. Part of the motivation for affective computing as a field is to better understand emotional processes through computational modeling. One of the four major topics in affective computing is computers that have emotions (the others are recognizing, expressing and understanding emotions). A critical and neglected aspect of having emotions is the experience of emotion (Barrett, Mesquita, Ochsner, & Gross, 2007): what does the content of an emotional episode look like, how does this content change over time and when do we call the episode emotional. Few modeling efforts have these topics as primary focus. The launch of a journal on synthetic emotions should motivate research initiatives in this direction, and this research should have a measurable impact on emotion research in psychology. I show that a good way to do so is to investigate the psychological core of what an emotion is: an experience. I present ideas on how the experience of emotion could be modeled and provide evidence that several computational models of emotion are already addressing the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Kring-Moran-2008.Pdf
    Schizophrenia Bulletin vol. 34 no. 5 pp. 819–834, 2008 doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn071 Advance Access publication on June 25, 2008 Emotional Response Deficits in Schizophrenia: Insights From Affective Science Ann M. Kring1,2 and Erin K. Moran2 Many factors have contributed to the relatively recent 2Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA increaseinresearchonemotioninschizophrenia,butacen- trally important factor has been the development and adoption of methods and theories in basic affective sci- Our understanding of the emotional features of schizophre- ence.Emotionwaslongconsideredtobethe‘‘blacksheep’’ nia has benefited greatly from the adoption of methods and of the family with respect to behaviors that could be em- theory from the field of affective science. This article covers pirically studied, but pioneering work by investigators basic concepts and methods from affective science on the psy- such as Paul Ekman and Carroll Izard in the 1960s paved chological and neural mechanisms contributing to emotions the way for emotion research to become not only well ac- and reviews the ways in which this research has advanced our cepted and integrated into psychology and neuroscience understanding of emotional response deficits in schizophre- but also as a discipline in its own right. Indeed, the explo- nia. We review naturalistic studies and elicitation studies sion of brain imaging techniques has further advanced our that evoke emotion responses among participants, including understanding of how emotion works at the level of the emotion expression, experience, and autonomic physiology. brain, and taken together, we now know a great deal about emotional behavior and its neural underpinnings (see We also consider how these emotion response mea- 4 5 sures correspond to schizophrenia symptoms, and we focus Barrett et al and Wager et al for recent reviews).
    [Show full text]
  • Empathy, Imitation, and the Social Brain
    Decety, J. , & Meltzoff, A. N. (2011). Empathy, imitation, and the social brain. In A. Copland & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological p erspectives (pp. 58-81). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 5 Empathy, Imitation, and the Social Brain Jean Decety and Andrew N. MeltzojJ 5.1 Introduction Imitation and empathy have long been studied by developmental and social psychol­ ogists. These topics now are hotbeds of interdisciplinary activity and are being influ­ enced by discoveries in cognitive neuroscience, which has begun to delineate the neural circuits that underpin these phenomena. The goal of this chapter is to bring together findings from developmental science and cognitive neuroscience on imitation and empathy. We place imitation within this larger framework, and it is also proposed to be grounded in shared motor representations between self and other (Meltzoff & Decety (2003» as well as regulated by executive functions (Decety (2006a» . Moreover, imitation has been theorized to scaffold the child's developing sense of agency, self, and self-other differentiation, which are also phenomenal characteristics involved in empathy. Thus, imitation and empathy are closely linked, but they are not under­ pinned by the identical neurological process. They are instead partially distinct, though inter-related. Studying the development and neural bases of these two abilities will enhance our understanding of both. 5.2 Infant Imitation and Foundations of Social Understanding and Empathy Human infants are the most imitative creatures in the world. Although scattered imitation has been documented in other species, Homo sapiens imitate a larger range t of behaviors than any other species, and they do so spontaneously, without any special training.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Farm Animal Emotions—Sensor-Based Approaches
    sensors Review Measuring Farm Animal Emotions—Sensor-Based Approaches Suresh Neethirajan * , Inonge Reimert and Bas Kemp Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (I.R.); [email protected] (B.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-068-343-2700 Abstract: Understanding animal emotions is a key to unlocking methods for improving animal welfare. Currently there are no ‘benchmarks’ or any scientific assessments available for measuring and quantifying the emotional responses of farm animals. Using sensors to collect biometric data as a means of measuring animal emotions is a topic of growing interest in agricultural technology. Here we reviewed several aspects of the use of sensor-based approaches in monitoring animal emotions, beginning with an introduction on animal emotions. Then we reviewed some of the available technological systems for analyzing animal emotions. These systems include a variety of sensors, the algorithms used to process biometric data taken from these sensors, facial expression, and sound analysis. We conclude that a single emotional expression measurement based on either the facial feature of animals or the physiological functions cannot show accurately the farm animal’s emotional changes, and hence compound expression recognition measurement is required. We propose some novel ways to combine sensor technologies through sensor fusion into efficient systems for monitoring and measuring the animals’ compound expression of emotions. Finally, we explore future perspectives in the field, including challenges and opportunities. Keywords: animal emotions; animal welfare; behavior; sensors; precision livestock farming; farm animals; animal-based measures Citation: Neethirajan, S.; Reimert, I.; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Infants Express Discrete Emotions? Adult Judgments of Facial, Vocal, and Body Actions
    DO INFANTS EXPRESS DISCRETE EMOTIONS? ADULT JUDGMENTS OF FACIAL, VOCAL, AND BODY ACTIONS By: Linda A. Camras, Jean Sullivan, and George Michel Camras, LA, Sullivan, J, & Michel, GF. Adult judgments of infant expressive behavior: Facial, vocal, and body actions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 1993; 17(3):171-186. Made available courtesy of Springer Verlag: http://www.springerlink.com/content/104925/?p=c13af7a4bec84f28b51fa65a0e061626&pi=0 The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com ***Note: Figures may be missing from this format of the document Abstract: Adult judges were presented with videotape segments showing an infant displaying facial configurations hypothesized to express discomfort/pain, anger, or sadness according to differential emotions theory (Izard, Dougherty, & Hembree, 1983). The segments also included the infant's nonfacial behavior and aspects of the situational context. Judges rated the segments using a set of emotion terms or a set of activity terms. Results showed that judges perceived the discomfort/pain and anger segments as involving one or more negative emotions not predicted by differential emotions theory. The sadness segments were perceived as involving relatively little emotion overall. Body activity accompanying the discomfort/pain and anger configurations was judged to be more jerky and active than body activity accompanying the sadness configurations. The sadness segments were accompanied by relatively little body movement overall. The results thus fail to conform to the predictions of differential emotions theory but provide information that may contribute to the development of a theory of infant expressive behavior. Article: Controversy exists as to whether infants experience and express discrete negative emotions. Early views of emotional development (Bridges, 1932; Werner, 1948) posited that infants initially respond similarly to any negative emotion stimulus.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Love and Hatred Are Common to the Whole Sensitive Creation': Animal Feeling in the Century Before Darwin1
    1 ‘Love and Hatred are Common to the Whole Sensitive Creation’: Animal Feeling in the Century before Darwin1 Jane Spencer Darwin was willing to discern a wide range of emotions in animals: not just those now considered basic in humans – anger, fear, sadness, disgust and enjoyment – but jealousy, pride, shame, ennui, wonder and curiosity. In Part I, chapter iii, of The Descent of Man (1871) he writes: Most of the more complex emotions are common to the higher animals and ourselves. Every one has seen how jealous a dog is of his master’s affection, if lavished on any other creature; and I have observed the same fact with monkeys. This shows that animals not only love, but have desire to be loved. Animals manifestly feel emula- tion. They love approbation or praise; and a dog carrying a basket for his master exhibits in a high degree self-complacency or pride. There can, I think, be no doubt that a dog feels shame, as distinct from fear, and something very like modesty when begging too often for food. ... Several observers have stated that monkeys certainly dislike being laughed at … Dogs show what may be fairly called a sense of humour, as distinct from mere play; if a bit of stick or other such object be thrown to one, he will often carry it away for a short distance; and then squatting down with it on the ground … will wait until his master comes quite close to take it away. The dog will then seize it and rush away in triumph, repeating the same manoeuvre, and evidently enjoying the practical joke.2 A monkey who disliked being laughed
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Emotional Expression on the Association Between Sensorimotor Simulation and Empathic Accuracy
    The Impact of Emotional Expression on the Association between Sensorimotor Simulation and Empathic Accuracy Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Psychology Jennifer Gutsell, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Psychology by Tong Lin August 2019 Copyright by Tong Lin © 2019 ABSTRACT The Impact of Emotional Expression on the Association between Sensorimotor Simulation and Empathic Accuracy A thesis presented to the Department of Psychology Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Tong Lin Understanding other people’s emotions is one of the most important things people do in daily life. Multiple systems are involved in this process including sensorimotor simulation, the inhibition of activity in sensorimotor networks (Wood, Rychlowska, & Niedenthal, 2016). Sensorimotor simulation has been studied in simple tasks such as reading a narrative or looking at pictures, but it is unclear how this simulation-related brain activity might play out in daily interactions that are far more complex than the experience of research participants in traditional social neuroscience studies that use non-naturalistic stimuli, nor do we know its impact on empathic accuracy. Therefore, we explored people’s ability to understand another’s emotions by combining a face-to-face interaction with a reliable index of sensorimotor simulation, which is mu suppression, an 8–13 Hz band-range of the electroencephalogram (EEG) over the motor cortex (Ulloa, & Pineda, 2007) in this study. In the experiment, we recorded EEG as participants took turns sharing one positive and one negative experience with their partner while the other listened passively.
    [Show full text]