DOCSLIB.ORG

Response to East Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response to East Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation BOROUGH COUNCIL OF WELLINGBOROUGH AGENDA ITEM 5 Development Committee 11 September 2017 Report of the Director Response to East Midlands Rail Franchise public consultation 1 Purpose of report To seek approval to send a council response to the public consultation on proposed changes to the East Midlands Rail Franchise. 2 Executive summary 2.1 This public consultation is on proposed changes to the rail service from Wellingborough. This will involve fewer trains stopping at Wellingborough during peak hours in order to speed up train journey times on InterCity services (those services from Sheffield, Nottingham and Derby to London). 2.2 To counter this reduction in peak time services Wellingborough will be on a commuter line from Corby to London that will be serviced by longer trains in order to try and reduce the resultant overcrowding due to cutting InterCity services. This would also mean fewer direct trains northwards to Leicester in peak times. 3 Appendices Appendix 1 – Borough Council of Wellingborough response to the East Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation. Appendix 2 – East Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation document. 4 Proposed action: The Committee is invited to RESOLVE to submit the response in Appendix 1 to the East Midlands Rail Franchise public consultation. 5 Background 5.1 This document proposes changes to the East Midlands rail service currently operated by East Midlands Trains (EMT) through a public consultation process. The overall aim of these changes will be to improve the experience of passengers by providing more space and comfort, better and more frequent customer communication with the rail operator, improving the reliability and value for money of the service. The consultation document outlines ten top priorities for improving the East Midlands Franchise, these are: Price and value for money All passengers able to get a seat Trains sufficiently frequent Free Wifi available Train companies to keep passengers informed about delays More trains on time Less frequent disruption Accurate and timely information at stations Well maintained toilet facilities Trains clean and maintained. 5.2 The proposed changes to the rail service from Wellingborough are in response to issues of long journey times and overcrowding on peak time services. 5.3 The document proposes a solution that involves dividing the East Midlands mainline into two distinct markets, an InterCity service that will no longer serve Wellingborough during peak hours and a commuter service from Corby to London which would go via Wellingborough. It is suggested that by doing this it will lower journey times on InterCity services and due to longer trains will reduce overcrowding on the commuter line. 5.4 There are other proposals within the document such as the aim to improve East to West connectivity and the potential for the extension of Thameslink services as well as increasing evening and weekend services. 5.5 The consultation document asks specific questions that consultees can answer within their response. The proposed response in Appendix 1 does not use these questions, as it is considered that the issues highlighted are more fundamental than the suggested questions and therefore it is more appropriate to comment on the document as a whole. 5.6 The Deadline for comments on the consultation document is the 11th October 2017. 6 Discussion 6.1 The draft response in Appendix 1 objects to the proposed changes to the rail service from Wellingborough in particular the reduction in services stopping at Wellingborough during peak times. 6.2 There is no evidence that implementing this proposal would result in a reduction in overcrowding particularly given the additional development at Stanton Cross and Rushden Lakes. 6.3 Considering the consultation document the draft response in Appendix 1 identifies that these proposals: Would have a detrimental effect on the passenger experience from Wellingborough and as a result are contrary to the overall aims and objectives of the franchise document. Would result in additional stops during peak hours for commuter trains from Wellingborough resulting in increased numbers of potential passengers and an increase in journey times. Imply that Wellingborough (as well as Kettering and Corby) are entirely commuter towns into London. This ignores the amount of commuters heading north to Leicester and other locations who will now have to change in order to reach their place of work rather than a direct service. Could result in the train becoming a less attractive mode of travel from Wellingborough to both the north and south and may result in an increase in the number of commutes by car, meaning additional road congestion and a negative effect on the environment through increased car usage. 6.4 The reference within the document to a proposal to extend the Thameslink line north from Bedford is supported, as is the reference to improving East- West connectivity and improving and extending evening and weekend services. 7 Legal powers Part 1 of the Local Government Act 2000 provides power for the council to promote the economic, social and environmental well-being of the area. Section 1(1) of the Localism Act 2011 provides the local authority with the power to do anything that individuals generally may do. 8 Financial and value for money implications 8.1 A good quality rail service for the borough has many economic benefits and can contribute towards jobs, investment and infrastructure projects that are critical for the success of other council policies and projects. 8.2 The frequency and quality of the rail service, particularly into London is a major attraction for the town and attracts many commuters to move here. This is particularly the case with the forthcoming Stanton Cross development where it is anticipated that commuters will be attracted to live due to its location near the railway station. Failure to keep the standard and level of service on the railway at current levels could result in the town and the new developments in the town becoming less attractive to people looking for an easy commute into London. Risk analysis Nature of risk Consequences Likelihood of Control if realised occurrence measures Loss of Rail Less frequent High Respond to the services as and fast consultation to try proposed. connections to and make the rail destinations for franchise consider commuters into alternative London and solutions. north to Leicester. Loss of Rail A reduction in Medium Respond to the services as what is a major consultation to try proposed. attractor to the and make the rail town for people, franchise consider jobs and alternative services. solutions. Loss of Rail Possible Medium Respond to the services as increased consultation to try proposed. overcrowding as and make the rail a result of franchise consider growth in alternative Wellingborough solutions. and loss of services. 9 Implications for resources There would be no direct impacts on council resources as a result of this response. 10 Implications for stronger and safer communities A frequent, fast and quality rail service can help to create stronger communities by attracting new people to the area as well as attracting businesses and services and by significantly increasing the connections Wellingborough has with other towns and cities. 11 Implications for equalities There would be no direct impacts on equalities as a result of this response. 12 Author and contact officer Thomas Shaw, Planning Policy Officer 13 Consultees Liz Elliott, Managing Director Julie Thomas, Director Bridget Gamble, Director Victoria Phillipson, Principal Planning Policy and Regeneration Manager Sue Bateman, Senior Planning Policy Officer Simon James, Policy Manager, NNJPDU 14 Background papers None Appendix 1 Borough Council of Wellingborough response to East Midlands Rail Franchise public consultation Introduction 1.0 This document proposes changes to the East Midlands rail service currently operated by East Midlands Trains (EMT) through a public consultation process. The overall aim of these changes will be to improve the experience of passengers by providing more space and comfort, better and more frequent customer communication with the rail operator, improving the reliability and value for money of the service. 1.1 The consultation document outlines ten top priorities for improving the East Midlands Franchise, these are: Price and value for money All passengers able to get a seat Trains sufficiently frequent Free Wifi available Train companies to keep passengers informed about delays More trains on time Less frequent disruption Accurate and timely information at stations Well maintained toilet facilities Trains clean and maintained. 1.2 Whilst the above priorities are fully supported by the Borough Council of Wellingborough it is suggested that two important priorities that are of great importance to passengers have been omitted. That journey times between destinations should not increase and that the need to change trains should be kept to a minimum. The borough council has significant concerns that the proposed changes are likely to result in passengers travelling to or from Wellingborough experiencing increased journey times and would result in passengers needing to change trains when travelling on lines north of Kettering. The borough council is concerned that stated priorities are not being met by the proposed changes in this consultation document, particularly in respect of the service that would be provided from Wellingborough. 1.3 This document is a response to challenges that the East Midlands franchise is facing. These include a lack of line capacity, meaning substantial investment in infrastructure is required if additional services were to be run. Long journey times, overcrowded trains, limited connectivity to other lines and routes and below average customer satisfaction results on the current franchise. Comments 2.0 The document suggests that the long journey times on InterCity services (those services from Sheffield, Nottingham and Derby to London) is because of these trains stopping at Kettering, Wellingborough, Bedford and Luton when they are already busy with passengers from further north.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A-4E Finds New Home Tasked with Transferring the Craft
    7!1 7 Vol. 24, No. 6 Serving Marine Forces Pacific, MCB Hawaii, Ill Marine Expeditionary Forces, Hawaii and 1st Radio Battalion February 15, 1996 A-4E finds new home tasked with transferring the craft. It LC,p1. Steven Williams is the only unit in Hawaii with heavy-lift capability. The other mili- The Aviation Support Element and tary installations on the island don't Combat Service Support Group-3 have the aircraft to lift the jet, aboard MCB Hawaii teamed up according to Maj. Jesse E. Wrice, Monday to transfer a 7,000-pound ASE operations officer. Douglas A-4E Skyhawk from Naval The six leaders in the transfer pro- Air Station Barbers Point to ject surveyed the jet Jan. 22. to Dillingham Air Field. ensure the aircraft was safe to move. The aircraft was donated to the "We did all of our homework in Find what's got the dolphins Hawaiian Historical Aviation January so it would run smoothly in jumping. See B-1 for story. Foundation, a non-profit organiza- February," said Wrice. tion, Sept. 19 by the Navy's Fleet Before it was transferred, the jet's Composite Squadron 1. The nose gear door was removed and the Great Aloha Run squadron decommissioned in tail hook was dropped. Dropping the September 1993 leaving most of its tail hook allowed the belly bands to transportation aircraft to the National Naval sit flesh on the aircraft's stomach. Aviation Museum in Pensacola, Fla. The team also added 400 to 600 The 12th annual Great Aloha Following the down-size, HHAF put pounds of weight to the nose of the Run will be held Monday at 7 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Metro Transit Pouce: Keeping the Community Safe Interview with Daniel Hall
    The Washington Metro Transit PoUce: Keeping the Community Safe Interview with Daniel Hall Nicole White U.S. History, David Brandt 2/5/2005 statement of Purpose The purpose ofthis oral history project is to offer a personal account of the beginning years of the Washington Area Transit system and its police department, through an interview with retired Metro Transit Deputy Chief Police, Daniel Hall. Hall was one of the first members of the Washington Metro Transit Police Department and his direct involvement with Metro helps to provide a very detailed account of the creation, growth, and changes that the Washington Metro and its police department have experienced over the years, and the effect that it has had on its surrounding community. Biography of Daniel Hall Daniel Deidrich Hall was bom in Cleveland, Ohio in 1948 and was raised in a middle class communis onthe East Side of Cleveland with his two sisters, his cousin, and his parents. He has hved in Cleveland, Ohio; Reading, Pennsylvania; Centreville, Virginia; and Silver Spring, Maryland. Daniel Hall graduated from Glenville High School and studied at the Universi^ of Cleveland, the F.B.I. Academy and the Southern Police Institute. After High school, Daniel Hall became the first Afiican American technician to work for the N.C.R. (The National Cash Register Company), and he later was drafted into the marines. Preferring not to serve in the Marines, he enhstedhimself for a four-year term in the U.S. Army. He served in the U.S. Army from August 1968 to April 1974. Furthermore, he tempormily served as the bodyguard for His Imperial Majesty while stationed in Ethiopia, where he was deployed twice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rail User Express. We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News Items from Groups Around the UK. Please Keep Your C
    September 2019 Welcome to the Rail User Express. RUX is published around the middle of each month. It may be forwarded, or items reproduced in another newsletter (quoting sources). Anyone may request RUX as an email attachment, or opt to be notified when it is posted on the Railfuture (Rf) website. There is no charge for either service. Following GDPR, Railfuture Membership now maintains both lists. Please advise if you no longer wish to receive the newsletter or link, or if you know of anyone who would like to be added. For further details of any of the stories mentioned, please consult the relevant website, or ask the editor for the source material. RUX congratulates Network Rail (NR) for delivering £98million of vital improvements over the late August Bank Holiday weekend. Blessed with fine albeit very hot weather, a 10,500 strong team worked round the clock to finish 448 projects on time, allowing a normal service to resume on the Tuesday. Some projects such as track renewal and the transfer of signalling control will have an immediate benefit; some will enable an improved timetable in December, while others have laid the ground for future developments. But all contribute to the Rf aim of a better railway. Well done! Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line FoFNL is still awaiting news of any improvements, which seems to extend back at least a couple of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Draftrail Strategy
    South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority DRAFT RAIL STRATEGY Consultation Draft – October 2008 South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice 1 South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice Contents Contents Page Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 5 2. The Rail Strategy in Context 9 National Context 10 Regional Context 10 Context Diagram 10 Strategy Objectives 11 3. Current Conditions 13 South Yorkshire Network 13 Local Network 13 Express Long Distance 15 Open Access 17 Freight 18 Rolling Stock 21 Train Capacity 23 South Yorkshire Stations 24 Access to Stations 28 Network Performance 29 Network Constraints 32 Ticketing and Pricing 34 Recent Land Use and Demand Changes 35 4. Recent Research 37 5. Future Conditions 39 Future Demand 39 New Stations 40 New Lines 41 Delivery Priorities 43 6. Action Plan 43 Details of Delivery/Funding 43 7. Monitoring and Consultation 46 Details of current Monitoring 46 Reporting processes 46 Consultation 48 2 Appendix One – The Rail Strategy in Context Appendix Two – Network Diagram/Map Appendix Three – Current Station Standards and Facilities Appendix Four – Proposed Housing Growth related to Rail Stations Appendix Five – Network bottlenecks and scheme dependencies Appendix Six – Delivery Plan 3 Executive Summary Executive Summary South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice To be drafted once contents are endorsed 4 Chapter 1 Introduction South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice Summary This document brings together changes in contextual policy and investment plans and Identifies the role of the Rail Strategy Provides an update on work completed since 2004 Summarises key developments and the effect on rail users Links all the above to explain the need for change Provides the planned actions to take the Strategy forward in the short, medium and long term 1.1 This Rail Strategy is produced by South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE), on behalf of South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority (SYPTA) and represents an update of the previous strategy issued in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Rail Campaigner Number 48 – March 2020
    Yorkshire Rail Campaigner Number 48 – March 2020 Yorkshire President: Alan Whitehouse: Vice-Presidents: Mike Crowhurst, Alan Williams & Chris Hyomes Trans-Pennine Upgrade Under Threat! By Mark Parry With the proposed trans-Pennine high speed line being supported, we feared the upgrade of the existing line had been quietly forgotten. Transpennine Express new rolling stock at Manchester Piccadilly–Photo by Robert Pritchard The following is a joint press release from our branch and HADRAG: The Halifax & District Rail Action Group; SHRUG: Stalybridge to Huddersfield Rail Users Group; UCVRSTG: Upper Calder Valley Renaissance Sustainable Transport Group. CAMPAIGNERS in West Yorkshire are extremely concerned about lack of progress by the Government and Network Rail on infrastructure proposals that should deliver improvements for travellers in the next few years, including the TransPennine Route Upgrade (TRU). Three rail user groups and the Yorkshire Branch of Railfuture have written to Andrew Haines, Chief Executive of Network Rail, who was recently been quoted as casting doubt on TRU. In a magazine interview (RAIL 897, 29 Jan’2020) Haines had said the scope of TRU could depend on the high-speed rail proposal “Northern Powerhouse Rail” (NPR). The campaigners say NPR is decades away and will not benefit stations on regional routes that desperately need investment now. Continued overleaf… Railfuture, Yorkshire & North West Joint Branch Meeting This meeting has been postponed because of concerns about the Coronavirus. We will contact members later about alterative arrangements. 1 | Railfuture: Yorkshire Rail Campaigner 4 8 – M a r c h 2020 The campaigners have also written to Secretary of State for Transport Grant Shapps MP, and to the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, calling for urgent, overdue projects to go ahead without further delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining and Improving Britain's Railway Stations
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Maintaining and improving Britain's railway stations Twenty–second Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 19 December 2005 HC 535 Published on 2 February 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £12.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Alistair Carmichael MP (Liberal Democrat, Orkney and Shetland) Greg Clark MP (Conservative, Tunbridge Wells) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Helen Goodman MP (Labour, Bishop Auckland) Mr Sadiq Khan MP (Labour, Tooting) Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) Sarah McCarthy-Fry MP (Labour, Portsmouth North) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Kitty Ussher MP (Labour, Burnley) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) The following was also a Member of the committee during the period of the enquiry: Diana R Johnson MP (Labour, Hull North) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail Report
    Community Rail Report Author: Jerry Swift, Interim Project Manager Date: August 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Committed obligations 2 1.2 Director's foreword 6 1.3 Executive Summary 7 2. Community Rail Report 8 2.1 Introduction to the report 8 2.2 Community and Sustainability Director’s report 8 2.2.1 Community Rail Partnerships 8 2.2.2 Funding for Community Rail Partnerships 8 2.2.3 Community Rail Partnership funding 9 2.2.4 Additional funding to support community rail 10 2.2.5 ComREG 11 2.2.6 Station adoption 12 2.2.7 Community Rail Partnerships 12 2.2.8 Volunteering 12 2.2.9 Working with communities 12 2.2.10 Growth in passenger numbers 13 2.2.11 The CRPs in their own words 13 3. Community Rail Partnership profiles 14 3.1 Settle & Carlisle Railway Development Company (SCRDC) 15 3.2 Leeds-Morecambe Community Rail Partnership (The Bentham Line) 17 3.3 Barton-Cleethorpes Community Rail Partnership 19 3.4 Yorkshire Coast Community Rail Partnership (YCCRP) 20 3.5 Penistone Line Community Rail Partnership 22 3.6 Bishop Line Community Rail Partnership 24 3.7 Tyne Valley Community Rail Partnership 26 3.8 Esk Valley Railway Development Company 28 3.9 South Fylde Line Community Rail Partnership 29 3.10 West of Lancashire Community Rail Partnership (WofLCRP) 31 3.11 Cumbrian Coast Line Community Rail Partnership 33 3.12 Furness Line Community Rail Partnership 35 3.13 Lakes Line Community Rail Partnership 37 3.14 North Cheshire Rail Users Group 39 3.15 Mid Cheshire Community Rail Partnership 40 3.16 East Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 42 3.17 Clitheroe Line Community Rail Partnership (CLCRP) 44 3.18 South East Manchester Community Rail Partnership 46 3.19 Crewe to Manchester Community Rail Partnership 48 3.20 High Peak and Hope Valley Community Rail Partnership 50 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail Report
    Community Rail Report Author: Carolyn Watson Date: 31 March 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Foreword 2 1.2 Executive Summary 3 2. Community Rail Report 4 2.1 Introduction to the Report 4 2.1.1 Community Rail Partnerships 4 2.1.2 Funding for Community Rail Partnerships 4 2.1.3 Community Rail Partnership Funding Table 1 5 2.1.4 Community Rail Executive Group (ComREG) 6 2.1.5 Community Rail Conference 6 2.1.6 Seed Corn Fund – Kick-starting new ideas 6 2.1.7 Association of Community Rail Partnerships (ACoRP) - Partnership delivery 8 2.1.8 Community Rail Lancashire (CRL) - Developing Engagement Through Education 9 2.1.9 Station Adoption Scheme 10 2.1.10 Northern Franchise/Arriva Strategy - Working with Communities 12 2.1.11 The Community Rail Partnerships 13 3. Community Rail Partnership profiles 14 3.1 Settle - Carlisle Railway Development Company 14 3.2 Leeds - Morecambe Community Rail Partnership 16 3.3 Barton - Cleethorpes Community Rail Partnership 18 3.4 Yorkshire Coast Community Rail Partnership 19 3.5 Penistone Line Community Rail Partnership 20 3.6 Bishop Line Community Rail Partnership 22 3.7 Tyne Valley Community Rail Partnership 24 3.8 Esk Valley Railway Development Company 26 3.9 South Fylde Line Community Rail Partnership 28 3.10 West of Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 30 3.11 Cumbrian Coast Line Community Rail Partnership 32 3.12 Furness Line Community Rail Partnership 34 3.13 Lakes Line Community Rail Partnership 36 3.14 North Cheshire Rail Users Group 38 3.15 Mid Cheshire Community Rail Partnership 39 3.16 East Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 41 3.17 Clitheroe Line Community Rail Partnership 43 3.18 South East Manchester Community Rail Partnership 45 3.19 Crewe to Manchester Community Rail Partnership 47 3.20 High Peak and Hope Valley Community Rail Partnership 49 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Benefit of Car-Free Housing Projects
    promoting access to White Rose research papers Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ This is an author produced version of a paper published in Ecological Economics. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/4735/ Published paper Ornetzeder, M., Hertwich, E.G. and Hubacek, K. (2008) The environmental effect of car-free housing: A case in Vienna, Ecological Economics, Volume 65 (3), 516-530. White Rose Research Online [email protected] The Environmental Effect of Car-free Housing: A Case in Vienna Michael ORNETZEDER1, Edgar HERTWICH2,*, Klaus HUBACEK3, Katarina KORYTAROVA4, Willi HAAS5 1 Institute of Technology Assessment, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Strohgasse 45/5, 1030 Vienna, Austria, www.oeaw.ac.at/ita, [email protected] 2 Department of Energy and Process Engineering and Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway; www.ntnu.no/indecol, [email protected] 3 School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK 4 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria 5 The Department of Social Ecology, Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies of Klagenfurt University (IFF), Vienna, Austria Abstract A case-control study of the car-free model housing project in Vienna was conducted to evaluate whether people living in this settlement have more ‘sustainable lifestyles’ than people living in comparable buildings in Vienna. Another aim was to identify the lifestyle characteristics and household activities which significantly influence the environmental impact of the residents of the car-free housing project and a control group.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2009-10
    Association of Community Rail Partnerships Annual Report and Accounts 2009-10 1 Principal Funders and Sponsors Department for Transport Network Rail Welsh Assembly Government Corporate Sponsors Abellio (formerly NedRailways) Angel Trains Association of Train Operating Companies East Coast Ltd (formerly NXEC) First Transpennine Greater Manchester PTE Grand Central Railway Kirklees Metropolitan Council Lancashire County Council London Midland Trains Merseytravel Virgin Trains Keeping the Service Running: Northern Rail 158 at Kirkby Stephen on the Settle - Carlisle line (Andrew Griffiths, Imagerail) Cover: Exchnage of greetings on the Heart of Wales Line (Chris Prichard) Association of Community Rail Partnerships Ltd A company limited by guarantee Registered in England no. 4219081 Registered Office: The Rail and River Centre Canal Side, Civic Hall 15a New Street Slaithwaite, Huddersfield HD7 5AB ACoRP Annual Report 2009-10 Telephone: 01484 847790 Email: [email protected] Website: www.acorp.uk.com Annual Report 2009-10 ISBN 1 900497 26 3 2 From the Chair O’r Gadair One of the great things about community rail, apart Un o’r pethau gwych am reilffyrdd cymunedol, ar from our day to day support to our members, is the wahân i’r gefnogaeth ddydd i ddydd i’n haelodau, opportunity to be able to work with others who wish yw’r cyfle i allu weithio gydag eraill sydd yn to develop new rail partnerships. There were discus- dymuno datblygu partneriaethau rheilffordd sions with several such groups and it is most reward- newydd. Bu trafodigaethau gyda nifer o grupiau fel ing to be in at the start and lend a guiding hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan Hearing 2021
    Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan Hearing 20 April 2021, order paper - Front page If calling, please ask for Democratic Services Transport Committee - Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan Hearing 2021 Tuesday 20 April 2021, 9.30am Council Chamber, Greater Wellington Regional Council 100 Cuba Street, Te Aro, Wellington Members Cr Blakeley (Chair) Cr Lee (Deputy Chair) Cr Brash Cr Connelly Cr Gaylor Cr Hughes Cr Kirk-Burnnand Cr Laban Cr Lamason Cr Nash Cr Ponter Cr Staples Cr van Lier Recommendations in reports are not to be construed as Council policy until adopted by Council 1 Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan Hearing 20 April 2021, order paper - Agenda Transport Committee - Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan Hearing 2021 Tuesday 20 April 2021, 9.30am Council Chamber, Greater Wellington Regional Council 100 Cuba Street, Te Aro, Wellington Public Business No. Item Report Page 1. Apologies 2. Conflict of interest declarations 3. Process for considering the submissions and 21.128 3 feedback on the draft Wellington Regional Public Transport plan 2021 4. Analysis of submissions to the draft Wellington 21.151 7 Regional Public Transport plan 2021 2 Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan Hearing 20 April 2021, order paper - Process for considering the submissions andfeedback on the draf... Transport Committee 20 April 2021 Report 21.128 For Information PROCESS FOR CONSIDERING THE SUBMISSIONS AND FEEDBACK ON THE DRAFT WELLINGTON REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLAN 2021 Te take mō te pūrongo Purpose 1. To inform the Transport Committee (the Committee) of the process for considering submissions on the draft Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan 2021 (the draft RPTP).
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 107 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 148 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002 No. 101—Part II House of Representatives b 1400 The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there for the Defense Department, including objection to the request of the gen- additional funds for the call-up of the CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.R. 4775, tleman from Florida? 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIA- Guard and Reserves as they were called There was no objection. to active duty to respond to September TIONS ACT FOR FURTHER RE- Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mr. Speaker, COVERY FROM AND RESPONSE 11; $6.7 billion is for homeland security I yield myself such time as I may con- requirements; $2.1 billion is for foreign TO TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE sume. assistance and embassy security pro- UNITED STATES Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to bring to grams; and $5.5 billion is to further Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mr. Speaker, the House the conference report on the pursuant to a previous order of the 2002 supplemental appropriations bill. support recovery in New York. House, I call up the conference report This is a war-time supplemental to add The bill also includes $1 billion in to accompany the bill (H.R. 4775) mak- further to our efforts to respond to the funds to avert the estimated shortfalls ing supplemental appropriations for terrorist attacks on September 11, to in the Pell Grant student aid program. further recovery from and response to provide necessary funding to pursue It includes $417 million for veterans’ terrorist attacks on the United States the al Qaeda, to secure America, and to medical care, $205 million for Amtrak, for the fiscal year ending September 30, support further recovery from the vi- $400 million for programs and activities 2002, and for other purposes.
    [Show full text]