BOROUGH COUNCIL OF WELLINGBOROUGH AGENDA ITEM 5 Development Committee 11 September 2017
Report of the Director
Response to East Midlands Rail Franchise public consultation
1 Purpose of report
To seek approval to send a council response to the public consultation on proposed changes to the East Midlands Rail Franchise.
2 Executive summary
2.1 This public consultation is on proposed changes to the rail service from Wellingborough. This will involve fewer trains stopping at Wellingborough during peak hours in order to speed up train journey times on InterCity services (those services from Sheffield, Nottingham and Derby to London).
2.2 To counter this reduction in peak time services Wellingborough will be on a commuter line from Corby to London that will be serviced by longer trains in order to try and reduce the resultant overcrowding due to cutting InterCity services. This would also mean fewer direct trains northwards to Leicester in peak times.
3 Appendices
Appendix 1 – Borough Council of Wellingborough response to the East Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation. Appendix 2 – East Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation document.
4 Proposed action:
The Committee is invited to RESOLVE to submit the response in Appendix 1 to the East Midlands Rail Franchise public consultation.
5 Background
5.1 This document proposes changes to the East Midlands rail service currently operated by East Midlands Trains (EMT) through a public consultation process. The overall aim of these changes will be to improve the experience of passengers by providing more space and comfort, better and more frequent customer communication with the rail operator, improving the reliability and value for money of the service.
The consultation document outlines ten top priorities for improving the East Midlands Franchise, these are: Price and value for money All passengers able to get a seat Trains sufficiently frequent Free Wifi available Train companies to keep passengers informed about delays More trains on time Less frequent disruption Accurate and timely information at stations Well maintained toilet facilities Trains clean and maintained.
5.2 The proposed changes to the rail service from Wellingborough are in response to issues of long journey times and overcrowding on peak time services.
5.3 The document proposes a solution that involves dividing the East Midlands mainline into two distinct markets, an InterCity service that will no longer serve Wellingborough during peak hours and a commuter service from Corby to London which would go via Wellingborough. It is suggested that by doing this it will lower journey times on InterCity services and due to longer trains will reduce overcrowding on the commuter line.
5.4 There are other proposals within the document such as the aim to improve East to West connectivity and the potential for the extension of Thameslink services as well as increasing evening and weekend services.
5.5 The consultation document asks specific questions that consultees can answer within their response. The proposed response in Appendix 1 does not use these questions, as it is considered that the issues highlighted are more fundamental than the suggested questions and therefore it is more appropriate to comment on the document as a whole.
5.6 The Deadline for comments on the consultation document is the 11th October 2017.
6 Discussion
6.1 The draft response in Appendix 1 objects to the proposed changes to the rail service from Wellingborough in particular the reduction in services stopping at Wellingborough during peak times.
6.2 There is no evidence that implementing this proposal would result in a reduction in overcrowding particularly given the additional development at Stanton Cross and Rushden Lakes.
6.3 Considering the consultation document the draft response in Appendix 1 identifies that these proposals: Would have a detrimental effect on the passenger experience from Wellingborough and as a result are contrary to the overall aims and objectives of the franchise document. Would result in additional stops during peak hours for commuter trains from Wellingborough resulting in increased numbers of potential passengers and an increase in journey times. Imply that Wellingborough (as well as Kettering and Corby) are entirely commuter towns into London. This ignores the amount of commuters heading north to Leicester and other locations who will now have to change in order to reach their place of work rather than a direct service. Could result in the train becoming a less attractive mode of travel from Wellingborough to both the north and south and may result in an increase in the number of commutes by car, meaning additional road congestion and a negative effect on the environment through increased car usage.
6.4 The reference within the document to a proposal to extend the Thameslink line north from Bedford is supported, as is the reference to improving East- West connectivity and improving and extending evening and weekend services.
7 Legal powers
Part 1 of the Local Government Act 2000 provides power for the council to promote the economic, social and environmental well-being of the area. Section 1(1) of the Localism Act 2011 provides the local authority with the power to do anything that individuals generally may do.
8 Financial and value for money implications
8.1 A good quality rail service for the borough has many economic benefits and can contribute towards jobs, investment and infrastructure projects that are critical for the success of other council policies and projects.
8.2 The frequency and quality of the rail service, particularly into London is a major attraction for the town and attracts many commuters to move here. This is particularly the case with the forthcoming Stanton Cross development where it is anticipated that commuters will be attracted to live due to its location near the railway station. Failure to keep the standard and level of service on the railway at current levels could result in the town and the new developments in the town becoming less attractive to people looking for an easy commute into London.
Risk analysis
Nature of risk Consequences Likelihood of Control if realised occurrence measures Loss of Rail Less frequent High Respond to the services as and fast consultation to try proposed. connections to and make the rail destinations for franchise consider commuters into alternative London and solutions. north to Leicester. Loss of Rail A reduction in Medium Respond to the services as what is a major consultation to try proposed. attractor to the and make the rail town for people, franchise consider jobs and alternative services. solutions. Loss of Rail Possible Medium Respond to the services as increased consultation to try proposed. overcrowding as and make the rail a result of franchise consider growth in alternative Wellingborough solutions. and loss of services.
9 Implications for resources
There would be no direct impacts on council resources as a result of this response.
10 Implications for stronger and safer communities
A frequent, fast and quality rail service can help to create stronger communities by attracting new people to the area as well as attracting businesses and services and by significantly increasing the connections Wellingborough has with other towns and cities.
11 Implications for equalities
There would be no direct impacts on equalities as a result of this response.
12 Author and contact officer
Thomas Shaw, Planning Policy Officer
13 Consultees
Liz Elliott, Managing Director Julie Thomas, Director Bridget Gamble, Director Victoria Phillipson, Principal Planning Policy and Regeneration Manager Sue Bateman, Senior Planning Policy Officer Simon James, Policy Manager, NNJPDU
14 Background papers
None
Appendix 1
Borough Council of Wellingborough response to East Midlands Rail Franchise public consultation
Introduction
1.0 This document proposes changes to the East Midlands rail service currently operated by East Midlands Trains (EMT) through a public consultation process. The overall aim of these changes will be to improve the experience of passengers by providing more space and comfort, better and more frequent customer communication with the rail operator, improving the reliability and value for money of the service.
1.1 The consultation document outlines ten top priorities for improving the East Midlands Franchise, these are:
Price and value for money All passengers able to get a seat Trains sufficiently frequent Free Wifi available Train companies to keep passengers informed about delays More trains on time Less frequent disruption Accurate and timely information at stations Well maintained toilet facilities Trains clean and maintained.
1.2 Whilst the above priorities are fully supported by the Borough Council of Wellingborough it is suggested that two important priorities that are of great importance to passengers have been omitted. That journey times between destinations should not increase and that the need to change trains should be kept to a minimum. The borough council has significant concerns that the proposed changes are likely to result in passengers travelling to or from Wellingborough experiencing increased journey times and would result in passengers needing to change trains when travelling on lines north of Kettering. The borough council is concerned that stated priorities are not being met by the proposed changes in this consultation document, particularly in respect of the service that would be provided from Wellingborough.
1.3 This document is a response to challenges that the East Midlands franchise is facing. These include a lack of line capacity, meaning substantial investment in infrastructure is required if additional services were to be run. Long journey times, overcrowded trains, limited connectivity to other lines and routes and below average customer satisfaction results on the current franchise.
Comments
2.0 The document suggests that the long journey times on InterCity services (those services from Sheffield, Nottingham and Derby to London) is because of these trains stopping at Kettering, Wellingborough, Bedford and Luton when they are already busy with passengers from further north. This creates overcrowded and slow inter city services.
2.1 The document attempts to solve this issue by dividing the service into two distinct markets, an InterCity market that offers fast travel from Sheffield/Derby/Nottingham and Leicester direct through to London whilst intermediate stops including Wellingborough will be served by a commuter route starting at Corby into London. This, according to the document, would create an additional 1000 seats in peak hours and solve the issue of long journey times for InterCity passengers.
2.2 The suggestion is that ‘commuter’ trains will be extended to up to 12 carriages to counter the loss of InterCity services. Wellingborough is currently served by four trains per hour during peak times, if all intercity services no longer stop; this will be reduced to just two per hour, a 50% decrease in peak time service. The borough council do not consider this to meet the objective that trains are sufficiently frequent.
2.3 Whilst the increase in the length of trains to up to 12 coaches may increase capacity slightly, as would the fact that the trains have no passengers from further north than Corby, would it be enough to counter the fact that half the trains no longer stop at Wellingborough and two train loads of Wellingborough and Kettering ‘commuters’ would be getting on one, extended, train? This is highly debatable. This would also be before any passengers get on at Bedford, Luton or Luton Airport Parkway, although it is recognised that access to alternative Thameslink services from these three stations may partially negate the impacts of these proposals in these locations.
2.4 Given two of the aims of the proposed new franchise are to reduce overcrowding and make trains sufficiently frequent, it is odd therefore to see services cut by 50% at stations including Wellingborough. Surely this is contrary to the overall aims of the document.
2.5 Even if the proposed 12 carriage trains were doubling the current length of the trains that serve Wellingborough (debatable given that InterCity trains are 8 coaches and often during peak times ‘Meridian’ trains are 8-10 coaches) the impacts on creating additional seats would be minimal given that 50% more people would be getting on one train that is 50% larger therefore creating a
minimal improvement if any at all. It is a struggle to see how these proposals will reduce overcrowding either at the stations or on the trains.
2.6 Currently most peak time services from Wellingborough to London only stop at one intermediate station, and two trains do not stop at all between Wellingborough and London (08:07 and 08:25). Whether the service stops once or nowhere the journey takes around 45 minutes. Firstly it is questionable how much quicker this journey could be done if the train did not stop at Wellingborough or Kettering. Secondly, it is assumed that in the case that these fast services would no longer serve Wellingborough the replacement commuter service would stop at Bedford and one of the Luton stations at least. Whilst the InterCity services may save a minimal amount of time by not stopping at Kettering or Wellingborough, trains from Wellingborough and Kettering would take longer due to the number of stops increasing.
2.7 The increase in the number of intermediate stops will also have effects on the number of passengers using the trains. It is acknowledged that starting the trains at Corby would decrease the crowdedness of the service when arriving at Kettering, however if two train lots of passengers get on at Kettering then the same at Wellingborough, then the service picks up more passengers at Bedford and Luton/Luton Airport, where normally it wouldn’t stop, it is obvious that the ‘commuter’ trains, by the time they get to London will be very busy and possibly overcrowded. As referred to above, currently the majority of peak time services stop at a maximum of one station between Wellingborough and London in peak times and whilst it is recognised that the trains are overcrowded from Wellingborough there are not a significant number of additional passengers getting on between there and London. Should these proposals mean at least two intermediate stops, then it is hard to suggest that the over crowdedness of the train will be reduced or that the journey time will be reduced. It is a struggle to see how this meets any of the aims or objectives of the franchise or how it solves any of the aforementioned challenges.
Wellingborough growth
2.8 Wellingborough is currently planning for significant growth, with a focus on two sustainable urban extensions (SUEs). One of these SUEs (WEAST/Stanton Cross) of 3650 houses and significant new employment is situated adjacent to Wellingborough station and is expected to attract commuters, particularly South East/London commuters. A key selling point of this SUE will be its location close to the station with easy, fast and frequent access into London. It is therefore critical for the success and attractiveness of
this SUE in particular and Wellingborough as a whole, that the train service remains as frequent and good as it can be, especially at peak times to serve the growing commuter market in the town. Overall, the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy prescribes a housing requirement of 7000 additional houses in Wellingborough up to 2031. This additional growth will create and attract a significant number of potential passengers into Wellingborough and therefore any reduction of the service from Wellingborough will cause issues for its future development and the attractiveness of the borough as a place to live, as well as impacts on overcrowding at Wellingborough station and on the trains. Whilst these are not direct issues for the railway franchise to solve, it is considered that regard should be had to potential increases in demand of this scale in the near future.
2.9 Rates of housing delivery are primarily driven by demand and the current planned growth rates were set on the basis that the current level of rail service would continue to be provided. If there is a detrimental effect on the service, this will result in reduced demand and reduce the delivery rate of housing which is contrary to Government housing policy.
2.10 It is considered that these proposals outlined in this consultation could have a detrimental effect on the experience of Wellingborough travellers and commuters which is considered contrary to the overall aims and objectives of the document.
Off Peak services
2.11 There is little within the document regarding off peak services. It is therefore assumed that these will remain the same in terms of frequency, (2 trains an hour into London; one train per hour to Leicester and beyond; and one an hour to Corby). Clarification is sought on page 29 of the consultation document where reference is made to off peak services increasing to Kettering and Corby, there is no mention of Wellingborough in the sentence although it is hoped and assumed that any additional services to and from Kettering and Corby would also stop at and serve Wellingborough as well. This should be made explicitly clear within the document.
Commuter Towns
2.12 The proposal to create a commuter specific line from Corby to London implies that Corby, Kettering and Wellingborough are entirely commuter towns for London. Whilst there may be elements of truth in that description, particularly in the case of Wellingborough, it is important to recognise the significant number of passengers travel northwards to Leicester in particular but also Market Harborough and beyond for work, university or school. It appears that peak services for these passengers will now largely require a change at Kettering and an obvious increase in journey time, disruption and effort. If this
proposal were to take place it would be crucial that timings are such that connections from Kettering northwards to Leicester link closely to the arrival of Wellingborough to Kettering trains to limit the increase in journey times to Leicester and other places as much as possible. This proposal could potentially lead to a decrease in the attractiveness of commuting to Leicester by train and more people may look to cars as a more viable option and therefore promote an unsustainable modal shift towards the use of private cars rather than using the train.
2.13 Commuters from Wellingborough to London typically spend around three hours a day on their door-to-door commute and are away from home for around 12 hours a day. This results in very little leisure time during a working day, taking into account the morning routine and evening meal. As a result, any increase in journey times will further reduce this small amount of leisure time.
2.14 Given the above, it is not surprising that commuters take every possible step to minimise their journey time. This is amply illustrated at Bedford where there is a choice of services between the InterCity and Thameslink trains. Even though the southbound Thameslink trains that start at Bedford guarantee a seat for passengers, few commuters choose them and instead choose the faster InterCity trains even though very few passengers will get a seat. Similarly when travelling from St Albans, passengers choose to cram onto fast Thameslink trains rather than the slower service that starts at St Albans.
2.15 There are a number of factors that affect the overall commute time such as; the speed that the trains travel, the number of stops the train makes and the time between trains. There is no reference to reducing commuting time in the consultation document.
Thameslink
2.16 Consultation is apparently ongoing with Thameslink to potentially include some of ‘East Midlands’ lines. It is assumed that this could potentially include Wellingborough. This could act as an alternative service to East Midlands trains and could dramatically reduce overcrowding. It would also potentially offer direct routes through London to Gatwick Airport and Brighton and a variety of other destinations.
2.17 The Thameslink service could be a vehicle to create cheaper options for people travelling into London. From Wellingborough-London a peak day travelcard is £68 with a railcard/£103 without a railcard. The exact same journey from Bedford (1 stop and between 12 and 15 minutes on the train) costs £48.30 without a railcard and £31.90 with a railcard, under half the cost from Wellingborough. The extension of Thameslink services up to Wellingborough could help to lower prices to more affordable rates during
peak times by increasing competition and the availability of cheaper tickets. This could create a better value for money service for passengers. However, this is not guaranteed nor is any specific timescale for this outlined.
East and West
2.18 The desire to increase East to West services involving the East Midlands route is supported. Currently there are few viable ways of transferring between the East Coast Mainline, the Midland mainline and the West coast Mainline. From Wellingborough it requires travelling to Leicester to then get a train to Nuneaton or Birmingham or the other direction to Peterborough/Stansted Airport, both of which are reasonably slow and mean a long journey time between Wellingborough and Peterborough and Birmingham for connections elsewhere on the West or East coast mainline. Often travelling into London and walking to either Kings Cross or Euston and then getting the train out of London again is quicker than reaching particularly Peterborough/Cambridge/Stanstead but also Birmingham on this route via Leicester. An increase in services and a lowering of journey times on these East to West routes would be welcomed and could reduce crowding on London bound trains.
Later trains
2.19 Reference to later trains on weekends and evenings is welcomed. Currently the latest train back to Wellingborough from London on a Saturday is at 22:25, it is 23:00 on a Sunday and 00:15 during the week including Friday evening. This Saturday timing is particularly problematic. It means people in Wellingborough cannot, without considerable effort, get the train home after watching an evening show in the West End, or a concert or sporting event or from a night out after this time. This should be one of the priorities of any changes to later evening services.
Conclusions
3.0 Whilst the borough council support the aims and objectives of the document we feel that the objective of maintaining or reducing overall journey times should be made an additional and high priority objective. A further objective should aim to minimise the changes needed to make journeys.
3.1 It is considered that the proposed changes will fail to meet the aims and objectives outlined in the consultation document in relation to Wellingborough. By cutting peak time services in half and moving to a more localised commuter service it will adversely affect the experience of passengers from the borough. Isolating Wellingborough on a commuter service into London ignores those passengers that commute north to Leicester and Market Harborough. It will also increase the over crowdedness of the stations
themselves with longer waiting times between trains and despite promises of longer trains, these will not be significantly longer than those already serving the station in peak times and so the impacts on overcrowded trains will be minimal at best and possibly worsened, particularly in light of the substantial new development in Wellingborough near the station that will add significantly to the numbers of passengers using Wellingborough station particularly for commuting to London, and the increasing number of stops between Wellingborough and London in peak hours.
3.1 Overall it is considered that this proposal would worsen the experience of passengers from Wellingborough, with minimal benefits. It is suggested that this proposal is at odds with the key aims outlined in the document and would not solve the identified challenges for the franchise.
3.2 Whilst not supportive of this element of the document there are some proposals that have the full support of the borough council, for example the idea of increasing connectivity East to West and introducing more late evening and weekend services. It is considered that a key target for these timetable changes should be a later train back north on Saturday evenings.
3.3 There is potential with the proposed electrification for the running of Thameslink services through to Wellingborough and Kettering and Corby. This would help to increase competition, increase seat availability and possibly lead to more reasonable pricing of tickets as seen at Bedford; it would also offer direct services to locations through London and to Gatwick Airport and Brighton. Any proposals to provide Thameslink services to Wellingborough would be supported.
3.4 Overall, the Borough Council of Wellingborough objects to this document and particularly to the cutting of InterCity services through Wellingborough, without any additional alternative provision during peak hours. The conclusion that this will increase the frequency and comfort of travel for passengers and lead to an increase in seat availability is highly optimistic particularly in light of the new development taking place in Wellingborough and the high demand that already exists from these stations into London. There is a danger that the end result will be InterCity trains running half empty and the ‘commuter’ trains being even more overcrowded than at present.
Scarborough
York Leeds
Manchester Doncaster Liverpool
Sheffield Barton-on -Humber
Chesterfield Worksop Lincoln Grimsby Crewe Matlock Cleethorpes Mansfield Skegness Sleaford Grantham Stoke-on-Trent Derby Nottingham East Midlands Parkway Loughborough Peterborough Norwich Leicester
Corby Ely Market Harborough Kettering
Bedford
Luton
St Pancras
East Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation
Driving Growth in the East Midlands – Connectivity as a Driver for Social and Economic Prosperity
July 2017 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
East Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation
Driving Growth in the East Midlands – Connectivity as a Driver for Social and Economic Prosperity
July 2017 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-transport General enquiries: forms.DepartmentforTransport.gov.uk
© Crown copyright 2017 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown.
You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU or email: [email protected]
Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
Contents
1. Introduction What is this document for? 3
2. Foreword Secretary of State’s foreword 5
3. The current service The current East Midlands service 9 4. Challenges Challenges facing the East Midlands franchise 18
5. Upgrades Planned improvements on the Midland Main Line 21
6. Our aims Our aims for the franchise 24
7. Improvement Options for improvement 27
8. Bringing it all together Our vision for the future 37
9. What will happen next 43
1 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
The Salt Cellar, Gritstone Tor, Derwent Edge
1 Introduction
2 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
1. What is this document for?
This document sets out proposals to improve the We also encourage you to attend one of our train services on the East Midlands rail network. consultation events. A full list of the events is Soon a new contract will be let for the right to run available on our website at bit.ly/east-midlands- the East Midlands services and as part of that we consultation. are running this consultation. Throughout this document the arrangement we have with the service operator is referred to as a franchise. In this document: This is a consultation document and we would like −− We explain why we are running a to hear your views on the service now, as well as competition to find the next operator your thoughts on how to improve it in the years to and the benefits this will bring. come. Please read this consultation document all −− We set out our aims for improving the way through and then, in the response form, your service. give us your answers to our questions. −− We seek your views on these aims and You can fill in the response form and post it to us, the options for improving your service. or you can respond online, or by email. Full details are shown at Section 9. We must receive your response by 11 October 2017.
Throughout this document you will see a number of questions in boxes, looking like this. These questions relate to the response form that comes with this document. ?
3 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
Old Market Square, Nottingham
2 Foreword
4 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
2. Secretary of State’s Foreword
The Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP Secretary of State for Transport
The prosperity of the Midlands is essential to provision of information to passengers, to offer our national economic success. The region tickets that serve flexible travel patterns and to is responsible for over a fifth of the UK’s total increase the frequency of services and the number manufacturing capability, with the service sector of seats. In short, I want the next East Midlands accounting for over four million jobs and worth franchise to deliver better and more comfortable around £158 billion a year. This is a dynamic region: journeys and better value for money, even as there are now 327,200 more people in employment passenger numbers continue to rise. Only by doing in the Midlands than there were in 2010 and the so will it serve the long term economic prosperity size of the Midlands economy has increased by £32.9 billion. of the region. Transport is at the heart of the East Midlands. So I am pleased to publish this consultation today. The region’s great manufacturers build trains, cars We are asking genuinely open, thought-provoking and jet engines. Its towns and cities are linked by questions in this consultation because I believe motorways and rail and its economy is growing. that some of your answers will stimulate innovative This means that more people are travelling too, ideas to find new and better ways of doing things, and in different ways. People want faster, long but I am clear that we will only do things that will distance rail services with more seats and simpler deliver for passengers and which have the support tickets. They also want better local services. of the public. As reflected in the government’s Midlands Engine Strategy1, transport and connectivity are essential to sustaining and building on this success. The award of a new East Midlands franchise gives us the opportunity to set the conditions for achieving this and for ensuring that the passenger remains firmly at the heart of decisions on services and investment. I want passengers to enjoy more space and comfort, more frequent and better communication with the operator and a reliable level of performance that delivers value for money. There are significant opportunities to achieve this across the East Midlands network, and this consultation document is an important part of that process. I will require the operator of the next franchise to bring forward exciting and innovative plans to improve customer service and the
1. www.gov.uk/government/publications/midlands-engine-strategy 5 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
The work to achieve this is already underway. On needs of passengers. I also want to see greater the Midland Main Line we are currently investing staff involvement in running the company for which in a significant upgrade across the whole route they work, including strategic decision-making at to reduce congestion and improve long distance the highest levels and, potentially, sharing in the journey times during the peak. As part of this success of the service. programme we have been exploring innovative Our plans for the East Midlands franchise fit with options for delivering improved journeys to intercity our strategy for rail across the country. The delivery passengers in a way that avoids the disruption of these plans will require the industry to break that electrification entails. Therefore, to ensure that free from traditional thinking and explore new and the enhancements deliver their full potential for all innovative ways of working. Train operators will passengers we will require the next operator to need to form new partnerships to deliver the service come forward with plans for modern, fast, efficient passengers expect, not just with Network Rail but and comfortable trains for the Midland Main Line, also with organisations that have a reputation for including a brand new fleet of bi-mode intercity innovation and excellence in customer service. trains able to run on both electrified and non- I will also seek to encourage additional private electrified lines. sector investment in infrastructure development, Delivering the best for passengers will also require which could deliver faster, more reliable journeys new ways of working. I recently set out my vision2 and new commercial, community and residential for the future of rail that brings together the different developments at stations. organisations who maintain the tracks and run I want to hear your views. In this document you the trains, so they can work collectively and to will read more about our plans, but I am always a common purpose. I want Network Rail and open to new ideas for delivering better services franchise operators to form a closer partnership to passengers. I encourage you to take this and work as one team with a shared focus: to opportunity to respond to the consultation and deliver a better railway for passengers. This ‘one I look forward to hearing from you. team’ approach will be brought to the new East Midlands franchise. Passengers’ expectations are increasing in today’s highly connected environment. Quite rightly they expect to be treated as individuals, to be rewarded for their loyalty and reimbursed quickly and efficiently when things go wrong. Staff need to be trained and equipped to respond effectively to the
2. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/an-innovative-modern-passenger-focused-railway-network 6 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
Break free from traditional thinking and explore new and innovative ways of working East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
East Midlands Parkway Station
3 The current service
8 Shaping the Future | East Midlands Rail Franchise
3. The current East Midlands service
Introduction The East Midlands franchise serves the heart of England – linking cities and towns such as Sheffield, Nottingham, Leicester, Lincoln and Derby. From there a network of long distance and local trains travel to other parts of the country including Liverpool, Norwich and London. It is a much used and growing rail service. The franchise offers 470 services each weekday and provides 26 million passenger journeys each year The franchise is made up of four distinct passenger markets: intercity, London commuter, inter-urban, and local and regional.
Midland Main Line
Scarborough Leeds Intercity: Long distance travel along York the Midland Main Line between Sheffield, Derby, Nottingham, Leicester and Wakefield Westgate Doncaster London St Pancras.
London commuter: Commuters into London St Pancras on the Midland Sheffield Main Line, provided by trains stopping at Corby, Dronfield Kettering, Wellingborough, Chesterfield Lincoln Bedford, Luton and Luton Collingham Airport Parkway. Newark Castle Belper Alfreton The above markets are currently Langley Mill served by the same trains. Lowdham Derby
Nottingham Beeston
East Midlands Parkway Long Eaton Loughborough
Melton Oakham Mowbray
Leicester
Market Harborough Corby
Kettering
Wellingborough
Bedford
Limited service throughout the day Luton Regular service throughout the day Limited Intercity service Luton Airport Parkway Intercity services London commuter services London St Pancras International
9 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
Inter-urban eet d Road tley dnes arrington Central Hazel Grove Edale Wi W Irlam Manchester Oxfor Manchester Piccadilly Stockport Chinley Hop e Hathersage Liverpool Lime Str Liverpool South Parkway Birchwood Bamford Hunts Cross Hough Green Grindleford Dore & To Sheffield
Dronfield
Chesterfield
n eto Alfr
Langley Mill ston Ilke m
Nottingham Grantha
NetherfielRadcliffed BinghamAslocktonElton & BottesfordOrston
East Midlands Parkway Loughborough
Peterborough Melton Oakham Stamford Whittlesea Mowbray March Ely Brandon Limited service throughout the day Thetford Regular service throughout the day Harling Road Eccles Road Limited Inter-urban service Attleborough Inter-urban service Wymondham Norwich
Inter-urban: Passengers using services across the country between Norwich and Liverpool via a number of major towns and cities including Peterborough, Grantham, Nottingham, Sheffield and Manchester.
10 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
Local and regional
er n
Doncaster ow Have Barton-on-HumBarr b New Holland GrimsbyGrimsby Dock Gr Cleethorp Goxhill eat Coates nton Abbey New Clee Healing Thor To wn e Stallingborough s s Gainsborough Ulceby Lea Road
Habrough
Barnetby Crewe Matlock Saxilby Worksop Alsager Matlock Bath Market Rasen Whitwell Kidsgrove Cromford Creswell Hykeham Lincoln Skegness Whatstandwell Langwith-Whaley Thorns Swinderby Longport Shirebrook Collingham Havenhouse Mansfield Woodhouse Newark Castle Stoke-on-Trent Ambergate Rolleston Mansfield Metheringham Wainfleet Fiskerton Longton Belper Sutton Parkway Newark North Gate Thorpe Culvert Kirkby-in-Ashfield Bleasby Blythe Bridge Duffield Newstead Thurgarton Ruskington Hucknall Lowdham Grantham Boston Uttoxeter Peartree Ancast Rauceby Bulwell Derby Burton Joyce Tutbury & Hatton Carlton er Hubberts Bridge Nottingham Spondon NetherfieldRadclif BinghamAslocktonElton & OrstonBottesfor Sleafor He Swineshead Beeston ck Attenborough ingto fe d d n East Midlands Parkway Spalding Loughborough Long Eaton Sileby Barrow-upon-Soar
Peterborough
Syston Limited service throughout the day Regular service throughout the day Leicester Limited local and regional service
Local and regional service
Barton-on-Humber line (to be transferred from Northern)
Local and regional: Centred on Nottingham, Derby and Lincoln providing connections to a range of regionally important destinations, as well as a large number of smaller rural locations.
11 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
East Midlands franchise These different types of services come together to form the whole East Midlands franchise.
Scarborough Leeds
York
er n
Wakefield Doncaster ow Have Westgate Barton-on-HumBarr b New Holland Grimsby Dock Gr Grimsby
Road Goxhill eat Coates
eet New Clee Healing Thornton Abbey To wn Stallingborough s tley Gainsborough Ulceby Cleethorpes Lea Road rrington Centra l
idnes field Hazel Grov e Edale Liverpool Lime Str Liverpool South Parkway W Wa Irla m Manchester Oxfo rd Manchester Piccadilly Stockpor t Chinley Hope Hathersage Hunts Cross Hough Green Birchwood Grindleford Bamfor d Dore & To Shef Habrough Langwith-Whaley Thor Barnetby W Crewe Matlock orksop Saxilby Whitwell Dr onfield Cr Market Rasen Alsager Matlock Bath esw ell Cromford Kidsgrove Chesterfield ns Lincoln Skegness Whatstandwell Sutto Hykeha Longport Kirkby-in-AshfieldMansfield Swinderby Havenhouse n Shirebrook Par Collingham m Stoke-on-Trent Ambergate Mansfield kway Woodhouse N Metheringham ewark Castle Wainfleet Newstead Rollesto Fiskerton Longton Belper Alfreton Newark North Gate Hucknall n Thorpe Culvert Blythe Bridge Duffield Bleasby Langley Mill Bulwell Ruskington Thurgarton Boston Uttoxeter R Peartree Lowdham Ancaster a uce Derby Ilkeston Burton Joyce by Tutbury & Hatton Carlton Sleaford Hubberts Bridge Nottingham Spondon He Swineshead Netherfield BinghamAslocktoEltonn &Bottesfor Orston Beeston Radcliff Grantha ck Attenborough ingto e m d n Spalding
Long Eaton Melton ough Mowbray Oakham Sileby Stamford Peterborough Loughbor Whittlesea East Midlands Parkway March Barrow-upon-Soar Syston Ely Brandon Thetford Leicester Harling Road Eccles Road Midland Main Line Attleborough Market Harborough Corby Limited Intercity service Wymondham Norwich Intercity services London commuter services
Kettering Inter-urban service Limited Inter-urban service Wellingborough Inter-urban service Bedford Local and regional service Luton Limited local and regional service
Local and regional service Luton Airport Parkway
Barton-on-Humber line (to be transferred from Northern) London St Pancras International
Limited service throughout the day Regular service throughout the day
12 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
Overview The franchise services have been delivered by East Midlands Trains since 2007. This is due to continue until 4 March 2018 with an option to extend it for a further year. The Secretary of State has decided to use the full extension period, taking the franchise to 3 March 2019, and intends to make further interim agreement with East Midlands Trains, which will end in August 2019. In this document when we mention the ‘next’ or the ‘new’ franchise this refers to the one scheduled to start in August 2019. Some of the key characteristics of the franchise are set out below. In Section 4 we share a number of the challenges that have been affecting the performance of the franchise and which we expect the next operator to address.
Performance of the franchise
Punctuality and reliability of train services is assessed Passenger satisfaction against a performance measure that shows the percentage of trains that arrive at their destination 90% within five minutes of the timetabled arrival (or 88% within ten minutes for long distance services). The 86% performance of East Midlands services as a whole, 84% at the end of March each year, is shown in the chart 82% below, noting that it has been consistently above the 80% average for long distance operators. 78% 76% Train punctuality 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
East Midlands Trains Long Distance Operators 96% Source: Transport Focus 94%
92%
90% 88% Stations 86%
84% The East Midlands franchise serves 134 stations 82% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201420152016 2017 and operates 90. The stations that they operate comprise a mix of small and large stations from East Midlands Trains Long Distance Operators Source: ORR rural locations such as Matlock Bath and Fiskerton to city centres such as Derby, Nottingham, Sheffield Transport Focus, the independent passenger and Leicester. It also operates a small number of watchdog, carries out network-wide passenger stations where the sole train service provider is satisfaction surveys twice a year to produce the CrossCountry. Many of the smaller stations are on National Rail Passenger Survey. The chart above community rail lines, which give the local population and right, based on the autumn survey each year, a greater opportunity to support the station and indicates the proportion of passengers expressing integrate it with community activities. satisfaction with their train journeys on the East Midlands franchise, noting that it has performed broadly as well as the average of all long distance operators. 13 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
Community Rail
Community engagement is an increasingly The route between Barton-on-Humber and important feature of rail franchises. The East Cleethorpes, which will transfer from the Northern Midlands network has a number of local and franchise to the new East Midlands franchise, rural routes that have been designated by the is also a designated community rail service, Department for Transport as community rail managed by the Barton to Cleethorpes Community lines and/or community rail services. These are Rail Partnership. There are a number of other supported by community rail partnerships, which community rail partnerships on lines over which the are made up of representatives from the public East Midlands franchise operates but these have and business sectors and volunteers. These their primary relationship with other operators. partnerships are funded by contributions from the train operator, local transport authorities and the Department for Transport. Heritage Rail The aim of community rail partnerships is to benefit their local community and railway through There are also a number of heritage railways connecting people with and engaging them in the around the East Midlands region, which are railway. The train operator plays an important role operating preserved lines and providing important in community rail by supporting partnerships both leisure and tourism links; in some cases these join financially and by facilitating events and activities at the community rail lines and regional network, such stations, on trains and in the wider community. This as the Peak Rail line, which joins the Derwent Valley not only increases awareness and attractiveness Line at Matlock and the Ecclesbourne Valley of local rail services, but also improves links with Railway, which joins the Derwent Valley communities and the reputation of the railway line at Duffield. industry. Each community rail partnership is led by a community rail officer who is responsible for delivering an action programme agreed with the train operator. The community rail partnerships in the East Midlands franchise are: • North Staffordshire: the North Staffordshire Line, between Crewe and Derby. • Derwent Valley Line: the Derwent Valley Line, between Derby and Matlock. • Nottingham — Skegness: the Poacher Line, between Nottingham and Skegness.
14 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
Community Rail and Heritage Rail Lines
Scarborough Leeds
er n
Doncaster ow Have Barton-on-HumBarr b New Holland GrimsbyGrimsby Town Dock Gr Cleethorp Road Goxhill eat Coates eet nton Abbey New Clee Healing Thor e Stallingborough s s Ulceby Barton Line
Liverpool Lime Str Manchester Oxfo rd Sheffield
Darley Dale W Crewe Rowsley South Matlock orksop Peak Rail Alsager Matlock Bath
Kidsgrove Cromford Lincoln Skegness Whatstandwell Longport Havenhouse alley Line Stoke-on-Trent Ambergate Butterley Midland Railway Wainfleet
Longton Belper Newark North Gate North Staffordshire Line Idridgehay Thorpe Culvert Derwent V
Blythe Bridge Wirksworth Duffield Poacher Line Ecclesbourne Valley Boston Uttoxeter R Peartree Ancaster a Derby uce Langley Mill by Sleaford Tutbury & Hatton Hubberts Bridge Nottingham NetherfieldRadclifBinghaAslocktonm Elton &Bottesfor OrstonGrantham Heck Swineshead
ingto fe d n
Great Central Railway Loughborough East Ruddington Leake
Rothley Peterborough
Greenacres
Leicester
Norwich
Community Rail Line
Heritage Rail Line
London St Pancras International
15 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
Recent improvements to the service
East Midlands Trains first began operating the franchise in 2007, delivering a range of improvements to the service, including: • Introducing a new train service between London • Investing in new automatic gate lines at Derby, and Corby. St. Pancras and Nottingham stations. • Introducing a direct service between London • Installing 65 additional ticket vending machines and Lincoln. across the network. • Adding a second train service per hour between • Installing over 68 additional security cameras London and Sheffield. at stations. • Rolling stock improvements, including • Adding 750 station car parking spaces additional seats on local services. across the franchise, including 100 at Market Harborough and 130 at Chesterfield.
Since 2015, as part of the current franchise, East Midlands Trains has delivered a variety of further improvements, including: New services and connections Accessibility • 24 extra weekday services, and 22 extra • £1 million invested in improving accessibility Saturday services between Nottingham and at stations, along with 29 new accessible help Newark Castle. This adds to the timetable points at unstaffed stations, linked to a 24-hour improvements introduced in 2015 that mean customer contact centre. faster journeys and more services between • Reduced booking time for travel assistance Nottingham and Lincoln on Saturdays. to 12 hours prior to the journey. • From May 2017, earlier and more frequent Sunday services are running between Lincoln Customer service and Nottingham and between Nottingham • On-train Wi-fi has been upgraded to 4G on and Matlock. the London services. Information and ticketing • Food and drink services extended to 13 trains per weekday on services between Nottingham • Additional automatic ticket machines installed and Peterborough. across the network. • Improved cleanliness of all trains. • Better customer information, with a new mobile app that allows ticket purchases. Community development • More information screens installed at stations, • Links with the community have been expanded, including London St Pancras, Leicester, Derby which includes running a schools education and Sheffield. programme and a work experience initiative.
16 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
The Old John Tower, Bradgate Park, Leicestershire
4 Challenges
17 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
4. Challenges facing the East Midlands franchise
Introduction There are a number of challenges facing the train service on the East Midlands network. Many of these are faced by other operators across the UK rail network, however some are unique to this franchise.
Infrastructure Crowded trains
• The East Midlands franchise shares parts of its • Intercity London peak services are more network with many other passenger operators crowded on this franchise than comparable and freight services. intercity services on other routes. This means some passengers are standing for some or all • The Midland Main Line between Cricklewood of their journeys. and Leicester has been designated by Network Rail as ‘congested infrastructure’, meaning • Regional services are also overcrowded, there is no capacity on existing infrastructure for particularly between Crewe and Derby, additional passenger or freight services. Newark and Grimsby, on some services formed of single-vehicles and seasonal journeys to • Network Rail requires regular access to maintain holiday destinations, such as Skegness. and enhance the network which may affect passenger services.
Long journey times Limited connectivity
• Intercity services from Nottingham, Sheffield • The current configuration of services delivers and Derby call at a number of stations to pick poor connectivity from the regional stations up commuters into London during peak times. to central transport hubs and other lines, This means that many peak services journey in particular the East Coast Main Line. times are up to 30 minutes longer than for • Stakeholders have expressed a desire for off-peak services. journey times to be improved on routes where • Intercity style trains are used to make commuter a connection is required by reducing the wait stops. These trains were not designed to be for connecting trains. used for commuter services and the increased • Infrequent services at off-peak times, combined time it takes for passengers to alight and board with limited connections, has led to a rail service at each stop leads to a longer scheduled that does not meet regional customers’ needs. journey time. • Some inter-urban and regional journeys are unpopular because they have long journey times. This may be because they also cater for local markets and are often timetabled around other services.
18 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise Albert Square, Manchester
Poor customer satisfaction
• Although punctuality on this franchise is above average when compared across the national network, it has below average passenger satisfaction amongst the long distance operators. We recognise that this is an issue which needs to be addressed. • The provision of facilities and services at stations needs to support growing passenger numbers and expectations, including better information, accessibility needs, greater safety and security, onward journey options, Wi-Fi connectivity. • All services on the East Midlands franchise currently use diesel-powered trains. Many of these trains, including some of those operating on the Midland Main Line, are older than average and don’t necessarily fit with modern expectations in facilities and comfort. Introducing modern trains will deliver benefits to passengers. East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
Rutland Water
5 Upgrades
20 Public Consultation | East Midlands Rail Franchise
5. Planned improvements on the Midland Main Line
Introduction Upgrading the service for passengers will be a continuous focus for the operator of the next rail franchise. A significant upgrade of the Midland Main Line will be delivered within the next three years, allowing the operator to address the needs of its growing customer base and deliver a truly modern service. The new franchise operator has a key role to play in facilitating the delivery of new infrastructure and delivering the benefits the investment is funding, including the benefits delivered to passengers through a modern fleet of bi-mode trains. Bi-modes will deliver passenger benefits sooner than electrification would without the disruption from putting up wires and masts along the whole route. Mitigating the impact of construction work will need to be done in close co-operation with all parts of the wider transport system but particularly Network Rail with whom the new operator will be expected to develop a closer working relationship and set joint targets with a single, shared focus on serving the needs of passengers. In particular, the next operator of the East Midlands franchise will have to work with Network Rail to consider how to plan, consult and communicate with passengers throughout construction work, to ensure they are given the information they need to make informed and timely travel choices. Passengers should feel that their money and patronage is never taken for granted while this upgrade work is being delivered.
21 East Midlands Rail Franchise | Public Consultation
Infrastructure development Upgrading the Midland Main Line