DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey Situations in Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene in Damaged by the Conflict Areas in Eastern Ukraine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey Situations in Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene in Damaged by the Conflict Areas in Eastern Ukraine SURVEY SITUATIONS IN WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION AND HYGIENE IN DAMAGED BY THE CONFLICT AREAS IN EASTERN UKRAINE Customer: UN Children's Fund(UNICEF) Perfomer: Luhansk Regional charitable organization "Luhansk communities fund"KHORS " Terms of the survey: 15.12.2014-05.01.2015 Date of report: 15.01.2015 Фонд громадВибір Table of contents Name of the Project: ............................................................................................................................ 3 Survey objectives ................................................................................................................................. 3 Place for Survey Implementation ........................................................................................................ 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Limitations in making the survey ........................................................................................................ 4 Short description of survey results ...................................................................................................... 4 Territories ....................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Affected population ........................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Temporarily displaced people ......................................................................................................... 5 Vulnerable groups .......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Problems in WASH sector (water, sanitation, hygiene) .................................................................. 6 Water supply ................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Sanitation and hygiene ................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Conclusions and recommendations ................................................................................................... 11 Appendicies ........................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 1. Population data. Affected population .............................................................................. 16 Table 2. Temporarily displaced people .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 3. Vulnerable groups .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 4. Water supply situation ..................................................................................................... 20 Table 5. Sanitaion and hygiene situation ....................................................................................... 22 Objects in the field of water supply, sanitation and hygiene, which is necessary to restore / improve and problems to be solved ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Territories questionnaires .................................................................................................................. 28 Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Survey in the conflict affected areas of the Eastern Ukraine Name of the Project: Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Survey in the conflict affected areas of the Eastern Ukraine Survey objectives Overall objective: Determine the needs in the WASH sphere (water, sanitary, hygiene) in Donetsk and Luhansk regions; Create an interactive map showing which territories of which region were surveyed, with pop up function where precisely in city were WASH objects surveyed Place for Survey Implementation Region: Lugansk region, Donetsk region. Lugansk region: Krasnyy Luch, Bryanka, Slavyanoserbsk rayon, Stanitsa Luganskaya, Popasnaya rayon, Severodonetsk, Lisichansk, Rubezhnoe, Kremennaya rayon, Novoaidar rayon, Svatovo rayon, Starobelsk rayon, Belovodsk rayon, Donetsk region: Svetlodarsk, Krasnogorovka, Yasinovataya, Avdeevka, Zugres, Mariinka, Mospino, Amvrosievka, Krasnyy Liman, Semyonovka, Kramatorsk, Slaviansk, Artyomovsk, Seversk, Konstantinovka, Dobropolie, Krasnoarmeisk, Mariupol, Volodarskoe, Volnovakha. Methodology The survey was conducted by the CF “KHORS” with the involvement of partner NGOs (Severodonetsk community development agency, Dyvokray-2008, Teremok, Kreminna Business Association, Community development fund of Kramatorsk etc). To arrange the survey two coordinators from CF “KHORS” were invited (coordinators of the survey in Lugansk and Donetsk Oblasts) and experts conducting the survey based on “cluster” method (one expert per several neighboring territories). Request form were complied and sent to the relevant organizations by the survey coordinators. “Cluster” experts controled the responses preparation. Assessment of the situation in WASH in Donetsk and Lugansk Oblasts was carried out by the representatives of the CF “KHORS” and the partner organizations in compliance with the questionnaire provided by UNICEF. The survey was conducted with the representatives of the authorities, water supply companies, healthcare institutions, tutors of kindergartens, teaches at schools, residential care facilities, sanatoria, rest houses and other places of compact settlement for the temporary displaced people, IDP`s, NGO`s, entrepreneurs and business leaders (depend on territory, approximately – 8 respondents in each survey site). That is, the people who possesses the information or can assess the situation in the WASH sphere will be interviews in dynamics. The sample for the survey and target groups composed by the “cluster” experts under the direct supervision of the coordinators. 3 Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Survey in the conflict affected areas of the Eastern Ukraine The training to clarify the methodology for the “cluster” experts was conducted by Skype, phone and e-mail. Information on results of the survey was entered in the specially designed Google forms under the control of the survey coordinators. Based on survey the analysis report on needs in WASH sphere in Donetsk and Lugansk Oblasts was prepared. Limitations in making a survey During making a survey following limitations were arised: 1) Lack of numeric data. As a rule, the authorities and other organizations do not keep records of the affected population in the context of interest groups. Also, do not always have data on the presence of vulnerable groups, especially in areas outside the control of Ukraine. Therefore, the data shown in the "affected population" and "Vulnerable groups" are estimates. 2) In areas that are not controlled by Ukraine, many informants refused to be interviewed for safety reasons. Therefore, in the territory uncontrolled by Ukraine, preference was given to individual interviews. Within the territory of Ukraine, the survey was conducted mainly in the form of focus group research. 3) In a number of cases, informants asked not to disclose their contact details for security reasons. In this regard, in the reports for the publication, the information may indicate the respondents removed. Short description of survey results Territoties The study interviewed 296 informants to 33 territories, including 20 in the Donetsk region and 13 - Luhansk. Of those, 26 areas are mainly controlled by the Government of Ukraine (including those that are controlled partially and undergo to periodic shelling by militants:Avdiyivka, Krasnogorovka, Marinka, Stanitsa Luhanskaya, Novoaydarsky and Popasnjansky areas). Not controlled by the Government of Ukraine are 7 areas (cities Amrosiyivka, Zugres, Mospino and Yasinovataya in Donetsk region, cities Bryanka, Krasny Luch and Slavyanoserbsky area in Luhansk region). In order to ensure safety in the territories beyond the control of the Government of Ukraine, in the form of individual interviews. In areas controlled by the Government of Ukraine, the survey was conducted mainly in the form of focus - groups. By the degree of influence of the conflict (damages) informants assigned territories as follows: The most damaged – 9 (Avdiyivka, Amvrosiyivka, Krasnogorovka, Marinka, Mospino, Semyonovka, Yasinovataya, Slavyanoserbsky area, Stanitsa Luhanskaya); 4 Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Survey in the conflict affected areas of the Eastern Ukraine strongly damaged – 5 (Volnovaha, Slavyansk, Bryanka, Lysychansk, Popasnjansky area); average impact – 4 (Zugres, Svetlodarsk, Novoaydarsky area Starobelsky area) minor damage – 15 (Artemivs'k, Volodarskoe, Dobropole, Konstantinovka, Kramatorsk, Krasnoarmejsk, Krasny Liman, Mariupol, Seversk, Belovodsky area, Krasny Luch, Kreminna area, Rubezhnoye, Svatovsky area, Severodonetsk) At the same time, in some cases, the area was called as less affected by the informants because previously damaged objects at the time of the survey have already been restored and the consequences were not so obvious. Affected population As noted above, in many cases there is no information on victims in the context of interest groups. In this regard, the study was able to gather information about the affected populations only in 15 territories. Information is mostly estimated. According to reports the number is 208 216 people (161 262 people in the Donetsk region and 46 954 people in the Luhansk region). Of these, 30,899 women (20,152 in the Donetsk region, and 10,747 in the Luhansk region), 7,928 children
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • NRC: Profiling of IDP Situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine
    ProfilingAnnual of IDP situation Report in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-drivenfrom approach the toBoard durable solutions 2019 Acknowledgements NRC would like to thank NRC staff and Mr. Petr Kostohryz, JIPS staff, members of the Techni- cal Working Group and the Advisory Group, Luhansk State Regional Administration, in partic- ular the Social Protection Department, Prof. Volodymyr Sarioglo, Analytical Center Sociocon- sulting, NGO Stabilisation Support Services, Luhansk Regional IDP Council. List of Abbreviations CSO Civil Society Organisation GCA Government-Controlled Area (includes any government-controlled area in Ukraine not limited to Luhansk or Donetsk regions) GDP Gross Domestic Product IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person JIPS Joint IDP Profiling Service NGCA Non-Government Controlled Area NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NRC Norwegian Refugee Council SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise SSS NGO Stabilisation Support Services UAH Ukrainian Hryvnia UN United Nations Profiling of IDP situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-driven approach to durable solutions 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...............................................................4 2. Introduction .......................................................................5 3. Methodology ......................................................................7 4. Limitations ........................................................................7 5. International Standards and National Frameworks on Durable Solutions
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine December 2017-January 2018 the Protection Cluster Includes Sub-Clusters on Child Protection, Gender Based Violence and Mine Action
    UKRAINE DECEMBER 2017-JANUARY 2018 THE PROTECTION CLUSTER INCLUDES SUB-CLUSTERS ON CHILD PROTECTION, GENDER BASED VIOLENCE AND MINE ACTION © E. Kaplin/ As the village of Novooleksandrivka is located © Photographer name/Organization, Photo description, Date between the extreme positions of the conflict sides, the movement of local population is restricted. PROTECTION CONCERNS Security situation: In December 2017, OHCHR recorded 39 conflict- PROTECTION CLUSTER CONTACTS related civilian casualties: 7 people killed and 32 injured. This is a 56 % increase compared to November 2017, and the highest since August Anna Rich, Protection Cluster Coordinator, [email protected] 2017. On December 18, Novoluhankse village (Donetsk GCA) was shelled with Sadaqat Shah Roghani, Child Protection Sub Cluster Coordinator heavy artillery ‘Grad’ rockets, which caused extensive damage to civilian [email protected] housing and infrastructure. According to the local authorities, 41 private Olena Kochemyrovska, GBV Sub houses, 12 apartment blocks, a hostel, a medical facility, a kindergarten Cluster Coordinator, and a school were damaged together with electricity and gas supply [email protected] lines. Martin Oubrecht, Mine Action Sub Cluster Coordinator, Freedom of movement: De-facto authorities in Donetsk NGCA adopted [email protected] ‘Decree’ No.363 of 25 December 2017, introducing a temporary Mykhailo Verych, Age and Disability prohibition for managers working in the public sector to cross the TWG Coordinator, contact line and undertake visits to the GCA. [email protected] Villages at the contact line: At the end of January, Novooleksandrivka Olena Lukaniuk, House, Land and village (Luhansk GCA)with population of 15 people was taken under the Property TWG Coordinator, [email protected] control of armed forces of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kremlin's Irregular Army: Ukrainian Separatist Order of Battle
    THE KREMLIN’S IRREGULARY ARMY: UKRAINIAN SEPARATIST ORDER OF BATTLE | FRANKLIN HOLCOMB | AUGUST 2017 Franklin Holcomb September 2017 RUSSIA AND UKRAINE SECURITY REPORT 3 THE KREMLIN’S IRREGULAR ARMY: UKRAINIAN SEPARATIST ORDER OF BATTLE WWW.UNDERSTANDINGWAR.ORG 1 Cover: A Pro-Russian separatist sits at his position at Savur-Mohyla, a hill east of the city of Donetsk, August 28, 2014. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing or from the publisher. ©2017 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2017 in the United States of America by the Instittue for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515 | Washington, DC 20036 understandingwar.org 2 Franklin Holcomb The Kremlin’s Irregular Army: Ukrainian Separatist Order of Battle ABOUT THE AUTHOR Franklin Holcomb is a Russia and Ukraine Research Analyst at the Institute for the Study of War where he focuses on the war in Ukraine, Ukrainian politics, and Russian foreign policy in Eastern Europe. His current research focuses on studying the development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Russian-backed separatist formations operating in Eastern Ukraine, as well as analyzing Russian political and military activity in Moldova, the Baltic, and the Balkans. Mr. Holcomb is the author of “The Order of Battle of the Ukrainian Armed Forces: A Key Component in European Security,” “Moldova Update: Kremlin Will Likely Seek to Realign Chisinau”, “Ukraine Update: Russia’s Aggressive Subversion of Ukraine,” as well as ISW’s other monthly updates on the political and military situation in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Cash Working Group Meeting, Kramatorsk 14 May 2019
    Cash Working Group Meeting, Kramatorsk 14 May 2019 Discussion Action points/Decisions ACTED provided the briefing/refresher on the tasks and modality of cash working group (CWG). As of last year, ACTED is voluntary co-facilitates the CWG and presents the findings of market monitoring. Also, the amount of multipurpose case (MPC) is regularly reconsidered on CWG. 1. Results on MPC in Q1 2019 (by UNOCHA) ACTED to re-send the link to the • 7 partners were operational in terms of cash in Q1 – ACTED (non-HRP), Caritas Ukraine, Dorcas Aid International, IOM (non-HRP), CWG page on People in Need, Terre des Hommes, SOS Children's Villages International. humanitarianresponse.info to • Based on information provided by partners, the total amount of MPC provided in Q1 was 23’163’250 UAH. partners • In terms of number of beneficiaries, 2092 were within HRP and 3251 outside HRP, respectively UAH 6’807’090 and UAH 16’356’160 provided. The request to participants was shared for the cross-checking of the figures. • All information is available in the form of interactive dashboards on HR.info web platform with detailed information as per Cluster, partner, delivery mechanism and modality. • ICRC was implementing cash in Q1 2019 but did not share the data officially. • Individual protection assistance provided by UNHCR is reported to Protection Cluster and not to CWG in order to avoid double reporting (as it was agreed with CWG). 2. Plans of partners for Q2 in term of MPC and other sectoral cash assistance programs 2.1 Caritas Kramatorsk in Q1 was operation in the “buffer zone”.
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities
    Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance Civil Society in Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities Volodymyr Lukichov Tymofiy Nikitiuk Liudmyla Kravchenko Luhansk oblast DONBAS DONBAS Stanytsia Donetsk Luhanska Zolote oblast Mayorske Luhansk Donetsk Maryinka Novotroitske RUSSIA Hnutove Mariupol Sea of Azov About DCAF DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is dedicated to improving the se- curity of people and the States they live in within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. DCAF contributes to making peace and de- velopment more sustainable by assisting partner states and international actors supporting them to improve the governance of their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms. It creates innovative knowledge products, promotes norms and good practices, provides legal and policy advice and supports capacity building of both state- and non-state security sector stakeholders. Active in over 70 countries, DCAF is internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading centres of excellence for security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). DCAF is guided by the principles of neutrality, impartiality, local ownership, inclusive participation, and gender equality. www.dcaf.ch. Publisher DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance P.O.Box 1360 CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland [email protected] +41 (0) 22 730 9400 Authors: Volodymyr Lukichov, Tymofiy Nikitiuk, Liudmyla Kravchenko Copy-editor: dr Grazvydas Jasutis, Richard Steyne
    [Show full text]
  • INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ASSISTANCE February 2020
    UNHCR UKRAINE Thematic Update | February 2020 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ASSISTANCE February 2020 Olena* and little Daryna* had to rebuild their lives from scratch after their family’s house, in the town of Zolote, was damaged by shelling in February 2019. Having witnessed the hardships of war, 3-year-old Daryna became psychologically traumatized and stopped talking. For a while, the family lived with relatives and later moved to social housing provided by the local administration. With support by UNHCR and its NGO partner Proliska, the family was provided with psychosocial assistance and Individual Protection Assistance (IPA) cash. This was used to access medical examination for Daryna as well as to purchase a bed to sleep on, a small oven, a kettle, and warm clothes to protect them from the freezing winter of Ukraine. Thanks to the support the family received, Daryna is now ready to attend the local kindergarten while her father has already found a job as a miner which allows him to provide for his family. Photo by Proliska. As part of its wider protection response, UNHCR provides Individual Protection Assistance (IPA) to the most vulnerable among the displaced and other conflict-affected persons in eastern Ukraine. The IPA programme provides a one-time cash or non-cash assistance to persons with specific protection needs in order to prevent their exposure to further risks. Potential beneficiaries are identified, either by UNHCR or NGO partners, during case management or protection monitoring missions to the field. IPA is also used to complement other UNHCR protection activities such as shelter, Peaceful Coexistence projects, Community Support Initiatives, protection counselling, legal assistance and/or advocacy on individual cases/issues at the local level.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Highlights
    G NER Y SE E CU O R T I A T Y N NATO ENERGY SECURITY C E CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE E C N T N R E E LL OF EXCE ENERGY HIGHLIGHTS ENERGY HIGHLIGHTS 1 Hybrid warfare against Critical Energy Infrastructure: The Case of Ukraine* by Vytautas Butrimas by Jaroslav Hajek, PhD by Sukhodolia Oleksandr, Doctor of Science, Professor, by Bobro Dmytro, PhD, by Sergii Karasov ANNOTATION This study seeks to answer the question. It aims to determine whether it is necessary to review his study identifies and analyses the the existing approach to ensuring the protection success of different hybrid warfare tools and resilience of critical energy infrastructure used by Russia in the Ukrainian energy throughout the Alliance. The case of Ukraine is sector between 2014 and 2017, namely unique – it is a country at war whose political, le- Tdifferent types of malicious acts against critical gal and economic conditions are, or until recently energy infrastructure, the implication of these have been, very different from those of NATO events for Ukraine and the lessons to be learned Nations. Any lessons learned will thus take this for NATO security. difference into account.2 INTRODUCTION The conflict in Ukraine is often referred to as an Ensuring the uninterrupted functioning of energy example of hybrid warfare, where conventional systems is among the most important issues fac- methods of fighting do not play a primary role. ing every country. This mission is not a new one Instead, an expanded use of the tools of political and measures have been developed to secure and economic pressure comes to the fore, includ- critical energy infrastructure – facilities, services, ing information warfare and psychological opera- information and industrial control systems so vi- tions built on disinformation and propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of the SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN and RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical Report
    STATE OF THE SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN AND RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical report 3 Contents INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................................5 BASIN, WATER USE AND CHANGES OVER THE PERIOD OF HOSTILITIES ...................................................................7 ASSESSMENT OF WATER BODIES IN THE NON-GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AREAS .........................................14 SURFACE WATER STATUS AND ITS CHANGES BASED ON THE MONITORING DATA .............................................20 HAZARD AND PREDICTED CONSEQUENCES OF ACCIDENTS.......................................................................................33 FURTHER STEPS: SURFACE WATERS ................................................................................................................................39 Dedicating the monitoring system to surface water quality ......................................................................................39 Analysis of sources and consequences of human-made accidents and emergency response measures .....42 GROUNDWATER STATUS .......................................................................................................................................................44 COAL MINE FLOODING AND ITS CAUSES ..........................................................................................................................54 FURTHER STEPS: GROUNDWATERS...................................................................................................................................61
    [Show full text]
  • I Impact O T of Th Oblasts E Conf S on Th Infr Lict in He
    15 September 2014 Kiev IMPACT OF THE CONFLICT IN LUHANSK AND DONETSK OBLASTS ON THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE SUMMARY This paper presents a summary of the damage assessment in areas affected by the armed conflict of Luhansk and Donets oblasts in the period since the beginning of the conflict until 14 September 2014. As of 14 September 2014, 1,968 facilities (including social infrastructure, residential houses, and enterprises) were reported to receive the damage, amounting to a monetary loss of total UAH 5.958 bn hryvnias, or US$ 440 mln (estimated, without account of unconfirmed damages in the residential sector, disruption of contracts, and lost profits of business enterprises). Among those reported 995 facilities are located in Luhansk oblast (UAH 1.094 million), and 783 facilities are in Donetsk oblast (UAH 3.964 billion). 190 facilities, with an estimated loss of UAH 900 m, belong to railway infrastructure situated in the territory of both oblasts. As can be seen in the consolidated table (page 6 and 7), 1230 housing buildings were damaged (667 in Luhansk and 563 in Donetsk oblasts), and this affected the shelter of 6,618 families (including 1,844 in Luhansk oblast and 4,774 in Donetsk oblast). Due to different limitations in determining the exact number of affected families, the real number of affected families is, most likely, of a greater scale than presented in this report. Indirectly (by worsened access to public services) the conflict in Donbass affected the majority of the 6,6 million population of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. It is worth noting, that the report indicates another 1873 housing buildings damaged during the conflict, however no verification (geographical/address localization) was possible by the team of data collectors, and this number remained outside the main analysis in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Ceasefire Violations As of 13 June 20171
    Table of ceasefire violations as of 13 June 20171 SMM position Location of Observation Type of Date/time event weapon/ammunition “DPR”-controlled, 5-8km NW Heard 8 undetermined explosions 12 June, 20:09-20:50 Donetsk city centre 3-5km NW Heard 3 undetermined explosions 12 June, 21:04 5-8km NW Heard 5 undetermined explosions 12 June, 21:09 3-5km NW Heard 13 undetermined explosions 12 June, 21:09-21:19 Heard 2 undetermined explosions 13 June, 00:20 Heard 2 undetermined explosions 13 June, 01:50 5-8km NW Heard 1 undetermined explosion 13 June, 02:11 N/K Heard 2 undetermined explosions 13 June, 02:15 Heard 1 undetermined explosion 13 June, 03:40 Heard 5 undetermined explosions 13 June, 04:45-04:54 3-5km NW Heard 1 undetermined explosion 13 June, 05:00 Heard 1 undetermined explosion 13 June, 05:10 3-5km WNW Heard 1 undetermined explosion 13 June, 05:20 Heard 6 undetermined explosions 13 June, 05:30-05:32 SMM camera in Recorded 5 airbursts 12 June, 19:34-19:36 3-4km ESE Avdiivka Recorded 1 undetermined explosion 12 June, 19:36 (government- Recorded 4 airbursts 12 June, 19:37-19:39 controlled, 17km N 3-4km SE Recorded 1 undetermined explosion 12 June, 19:39 of Donetsk) Recorded 1 airburst 12 June, 19:40 4-6km ESE Recorded 2 undetermined explosions 12 June, 19:45-19:46 3-4km ESE Recorded 2 undetermined explosions 12 June, 19:46 Recorded 3 undetermined explosions 4-6km ESE 12 June, 19:47-19:54 Recorded 2 undetermined explosions 4-6km E Recorded 2 undetermined explosions 12 June, 19:58-20:00 Recorded 1 undetermined explosion 12 June, 20:03 4-6km
    [Show full text]