DOCSLIB.ORG

Rwanda's MDR Party Repudiates Faustin Twagiramungu the Democratic Republic Movement Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rwanda's MDR Party Repudiates Faustin Twagiramungu the Democratic Republic Movement Party Digital Commons @ George Fox University David Rawson Collection on the Rwandan Genocide Archives and Museum 11-21-1995 Rwanda's MDR Party Repudiates Faustin Twagiramungu the Democratic Republic Movement Party Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/rawson_rwanda (TH) 07. 28. ' 1:14 I 0; DtJ I'U, 1 40UU"'"+Uv"' ,,...,_," Faustin TWAGIRAMUNGU RWANDA (Phonetic: twahgearahMUHNgoo) Prime Minister (since 19 July 1994) Addressed as: Mr. Prime Minister Twagiramungu was bom in Cyangugu in 'Faustin Twagiramungu, a Hutu, heads a five­ southwestern Rwanda in 1946. He holds a degree party coalition government that was formed by the in business administration from the University of Tutsi-dominated Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) Ottawa, a BA in international relations from after it defeated the forces of the interim McGill University, and a MA from the University government formed after the death of former of Quebec. Twagiramungu worked for the President (1973-94) Juvenal Habyarimana, government's transportation parastatal for several according to press reports. Twagiramungu, who years before forming his own transportation leads a faction of the Democratic Republican company in the 1980s. After Habyarimana Movement (MDR), had been designated Prime legalized independent political parties in 1991, Minister of a transition government to be formed Twagiramungu founded the MDR. as part of the Arusha Accord--an agreement between the Habyarimana regime and its Twagiramungu is the son-in-law of opponents, which was signed in August 1993 but independent Rwanda's first President (1962-73), never implemented. Publicly supportive of ethnic Gregoire Kayibanda, who was overthrown by reconciliation, Twagiramungu was forced to flee in Habyarimana. The Prime Minister speaks French Apri11994 after Habyarimana's death sparked and English in addition to his native renewed ethnic and political violence, according to Kinyarwandan. press reports. He returned to Kigali in early July 1994. 22 July 1994 6 N.J. 'r'1:l6 001 WAI~tt.IQTON, g.C:. Lll • , ••.••• , . • . 1 I) ••. ....... - ------ (11 RELEASED IN FULL AMBA&&AOE DE LA AEPUBLIOUE RWANDAifiE 171 .. NEW HA .. I'S~tllt AVENUE. N.W. VifABMING1'0H. D.C. aooo. c;oa• a•a·a•ea n, UISO" IIWAW UM 'All 1110. c;o:a1 a*a ... e.w Et\CSIMILH TJ.ANSMITIAL SHHE:f nArn-rJ.ov ~ taC PLEASE DBUVER TO:-~-i-'!!!C--~~S[.k:!.-.L. __ ---~~-···--~~~ ~~-- ·-------- FROM;¥-~-'--- @ NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET)--·-----~-------·-- IF YOU 00 NOT RECEIVE ALL THE. PAGES TRANSMriTED, PLEASE CALL (202) 232-2882 AND ASK FOR--------~---------------- COMMENTS: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVIEW ,AUTHORITY: JOHN L MILLS DATE/CASE ID: 03 NOV 2008 200103014 UNCLASSIFIED ·'i -··,. ., .. - •• .,_..r' .-, ..._.IL..I'4-V"""' J _4. •1.'-\J -·-~-! .. :.:· -· -;.::1 J.:;;J: ~-y- Ml~FET .~ . • RELEASED IN FULL OJ:MOCRATIC REPUBLIC MOUVENIENT PARTV (MDR) SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT we. membel's of the political committee and o"ther level$ of authorities of the MDR Patty: After analytsing the dectariftlons by Mr. TWAGIRAMUNGU Faustfn In BruxeUs&, Belgium inGiting r~fugee& not to return to their country; In LaHaye. Natheflend, ittlvgstlng th~t the government for which he was tne Prtma Minlter killed 300.000 people: in Montreal, Canada, stating that the present government ls worse than HABYARtMANA's regime, and fn New York, W&&hington, where he appealed to tnt International ComrnunltY to stop glvlng eld to the rwandeae government for the reason that he was dismissed as Prime Minister: . Having noted that Mr. TWAGIRAMUNGU F:austin has demonstrated nfs greed of power for selfish motives and interest~ vvith contempt far national interst for 'he population es a whole: ~aving realised that Mr. TWAGIRAIVIUNGU Faust in has e avsternatlc ~im of discradlting tke rwendese government of wl'\ich the MOll patty Is mandated to lead by acting against the governrnent fundamental principles and programmes for .the national unity; Having understood that in his discradltlng declaratiQns ageinst the present government, Mr. TWAGIRAMUNGU ~austin Is using his former title as Prime Minister of Rwanda and a:s rhe currrent president of t~e MOR party; lt'l comformlty to the fact that the MOR pertv Is within the current rwandese government and was Intrusted Its leadershiPi We hereby announce to the rwanelese people and tO the International Community the following: 1. The MDR party has never asked Mr. TWAGI~AMUNGU Faustin to go wondering arrouna places and make such aeclaretions. Consequentty. all his speeches are from his own opinion beceuse the MOR party never Q8Ve hirn any form of related mandate. 2. All members of the MOFt party and all rwandese people should not pay anv attention to what Mr. TRWAGIRAMUNGU Fau&tin is publicising because his oeclarations are aimed at misleading people, perpetrating hatred among the rwandes.e people and bringing misundefstanding between the government ot Rwanda al")d the •nternational Cornmuntty. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVIEW AUTHORITY: JOHN L MILLS D~TE/CASE ID: 03 NOV 2008 200103014 " UNCLASSIFIED TO: 2 3. Tl'le rwandese refugees must reulise that when Mr. TWAGIRAMUNGU Fau~tln incites them not to return home It It only tor hta selflah political jnterest&. Thus, his propaganda Is similar to the one used by so called govemment o' "ABATABAZI• lthe genocidal government) who led them in e bottomless pit. 4. The lntern~:~tianal Community should not listen to false declarations of Mr. TWAGIRAMUNGU Feustin. Instead. the tnternatinal Community should continue to support and help the rwandese government of the national unity In its undertaken programme of bringing home refugees. of rehabilitating and reconstructing a country which has been devasteted by last year genocide and massacres. 5. Given that Mr. TWAGIRAMUNGU Faustin is determined to oppose to the current rwandese government of which the MDA pertv takes part and that the MOA party waa inducted to lead 1:he same government; thiS is enough evidence thet Mr. TWAGIRAMUNGU Faustln is in contradiction with the fundamente~l principles end objectil6es of tha same political parw. · Henceforth, We nave decided from now that Mr. TWAGIAAMUNGU Faustin is no longer the president of the MOR perty be it at the national or prefectural levels. .~ pJ ~· ,,, I) i11.' i"i. I Ct J.~t.: c:.. 'J, At:: ·-<. \ ."' ,.,.. (t; • 6t.~ t. £ cl • t --~ .J_f ../14e i4.; ·- /~i ~· '· ." -1:i ~I,. I" • - I .. I .. (., ... UNCLASSIFIED .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dispute Over U.N. Report Evokes Rwandan Déjà Vu by HOWARD W
    September 30, 2010 Dispute Over U.N. Report Evokes Rwandan Déjà Vu By HOWARD W. FRENCH and JEFFREY GETTLEMAN When drafts of a United Nations study recently surfaced accusing Rwandan forces of committing atrocities against Hutu refugees in Congo in the 1990s — crimes that could constitute acts of genocide — the Rwandan government protested vociferously. It even threatened to withdraw its peacekeepers from Sudan and elsewhere if the report was published. The dispute immediately raised some pointed questions. Would the United Nations stand its ground, or would it suppress or alter a report about the past for the sake of the present? But often lost in the debate was a salient déjà vu: The two sides had been in a similar standoff years before. In the fall of 1994, just after nearly a million people had been killed in the Rwandan genocide, a team of United Nations investigators concluded that the Rwandan rebels who finally stopped the genocide had killed tens of thousands of people themselves. But after strong pressure from both Rwanda and Washington and intense debate within the United Nations, the report was never published. Sixteen years later, a 14-page official summary of that investigation paints a disturbing picture of the victorious rebel forces who would form the new Rwandan government. The findings in the 1994 report tell of soldiers rounding up civilians and methodically killing unarmed men, women and children. Several of the allegations are uncannily similar to the scale and tactics depicted in the new United Nations report, expected to be released on Friday, which says that these same Rwandan forces systematically hunted down tens of thousands of refugees fleeing across the Democratic Republic of Congo, as well as attacking local Congolese Hutu.
    [Show full text]
  • ORIGINAL: ENGLISH TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Erik Møse
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda ORIGINAL: ENGLISH TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Erik Møse, presiding Judge Jai Ram Reddy Judge Sergei Alekseevich Egorov Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 18 December 2008 THE PROSECUTOR v. Théoneste BAGOSORA Gratien KABILIGI Aloys NTABAKUZE Anatole NSENGIYUMVA Case No. ICTR-98-41-T JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE Office of the Prosecutor: Counsel for the Defence: Barbara Mulvaney Raphaël Constant Christine Graham Allison Turner Kartik Murukutla Paul Skolnik Rashid Rashid Frédéric Hivon Gregory Townsend Peter Erlinder Drew White Kennedy Ogetto Gershom Otachi Bw’Omanwa The Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora et al., Case No. ICTR-98-41-T TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 1 1. Overview ................................................................................................................... 1 2. The Accused ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Théoneste Bagosora ................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Gratien Kabiligi ....................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Aloys Ntabakuze ...................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Anatole Nsengiyumva .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda's Hutu Extremist Insurgency: an Eyewitness Perspective
    Rwanda’s Hutu Extremist Insurgency: An Eyewitness Perspective Richard Orth1 Former US Defense Attaché in Kigali Prior to the signing of the Arusha Accords in August 1993, which ended Rwanda’s three year civil war, Rwandan Hutu extremists had already begun preparations for a genocidal insurgency against the soon-to-be implemented, broad-based transitional government.2 They intended to eliminate all Tutsis and Hutu political moderates, thus ensuring the political control and dominance of Rwanda by the Hutu extremists. In April 1994, civil war reignited in Rwanda and genocide soon followed with the slaughter of 800,000 to 1 million people, primarily Tutsis, but including Hutu political moderates.3 In July 1994 the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) defeated the rump government,4 forcing the flight of approximately 40,000 Forces Armees Rwandaises (FAR) and INTERAHAMWE militia into neighboring Zaire and Tanzania. The majority of Hutu soldiers and militia fled to Zaire. In August 1994, the EX- FAR/INTERAHAMWE began an insurgency from refugee camps in eastern Zaire against the newly established, RPF-dominated, broad-based government. The new government desired to foster national unity. This action signified a juxtaposition of roles: the counterinsurgent Hutu-dominated government and its military, the FAR, becoming insurgents; and the guerrilla RPF leading a broad-based government of national unity and its military, the Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA), becoming the counterinsurgents. The current war in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DROC), called by some notable diplomats “Africa’s First World War,” involving the armies of seven countries as well as at least three different Central African insurgent groups, can trace its root cause to the 1994 Rwanda genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Undermining Unamir
    CHAPTER 4 UNDERMINING UNAMIR 4.1 THE A RUSHA PEACE ACCORDS It was a triumph for international diplomacy when on August 4, 1993, the Arusha Peace Accords between the Rwandan government and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) were signed. After one year of negotiations and three years of war, the parties agreed upon the power sharing agreement. Through external pressure, the two parties had come to the conclusion of the Peace Agreement, which made it a true victory for foreign diplomacy.l All regional states2 had been involved: the Organization ofAfrican Unity (OAU) had led the negotiations, and Western states had observer status3 or monitored the negoti­ ations from their embassies in Tanzania.4 The peace agreement provided for the so-called Broad Based Transitional Government (BBTG) that would hold power for 22 months at the most, after which elections would follow. This interim government would consist of 21 ministers. The Mouvement Revolutionaire National pour Ie Developpement (MRND) and the RPF would each have five ministers and the Mouvement Democratique Republicain (MRD), the largest opposition party, would have four ministers ofwhich one would be the prime minister during the transition. Faustin Twagiramungu would hold this position. The other seven ministerial posts were to be divided among the rest ofthe parties. The fear for dominance by one party or another was demonstrated by the voting system, which required a majority oftwo-thirds for decisions, meaning 14 votes in favor. 5 Linda Melvern, A People Betrayed. The Role ofthe West in Rwanda's Genocide, pp. 52-53 (2000) (hereinafter Melvern, 2000); Linda Melvern, Conspiracy to Murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to VP Kagame
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University David Rawson Collection on the Rwandan Genocide Archives and Museum 8-31-1995 Letter to VP Kagame US Embassy Rwanda Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/rawson_rwanda Recommended Citation US Embassy Rwanda, "Letter to VP Kagame" (1995). David Rawson Collection on the Rwandan Genocide. 90. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/rawson_rwanda/90 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Archives and Museum at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in David Rawson Collection on the Rwandan Genocide by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNCLASSIFIED 9 Date Printed: CHANNEL: n/a 17 Mar 2003 DOC NBR: 1995KIGALI02833 HANDLING: n/a <<<<.>>>> PTQ8863 UNCLASSIFIED PTQ8863 PAGE 01 KIGALI 02833 311609Z ACTION AF-01 INFO LOG-00 CIAE-00 OASY-00 DODE-00 SRPP-00 H-01 TEDE-00 INR-00 L-01 ADS-00 M-OO NSAE-00 NSCE-00 OMB-01 PA-02 PM-00 PRS-01 P-01 SP-00 SS-00 TRSE-00 T-OO USIE-00 PMB-00 PRME-01 DRL-09 G-OO /018W ------------------E86FDA 311609Z /38 P 311602Z AUG 95 FM AMEMBASSY KIGALI TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1277 UNCLAS KIGALI 002833 DEPARTMENT FOR AF/C AMB BOGOSIAN FROM AMBASSADOR E.O. 12356: N/A TAGS: PGOV, PREL, MOPS, RW SUBJECT: LETTER TO VP KAGAME 1. FOLLOWING IS THE TEXT OF A LETTER SENT TO VICE PRESIDENT KAGAME FROM AMBASSADOR RAWSON. BEGIN TEXT: KIGALI, RWANDA AUGUST 31, 1995 DEAR MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda: Background and Current Developments
    Rwanda: Background and Current Developments Ted Dagne Specialist in African Affairs February 4, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40115 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Rwanda: Background and Current Developments Summary In 2003, Rwanda held its first multi-party presidential and parliamentary elections in decades. President Paul Kagame of the Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF) won 95% of the votes cast, while his nearest rival, Faustin Twagiramungu, received 3.6% of the votes cast. In the legislative elections, the ruling RPF won 73% in the 80-seat National Assembly, while the remaining seats went to RPF allies and former coalition partners. In September 2008, Rwanda held legislative elections, and the RPF won a majority of the seats. Rwandese women are now the majority in the National Assembly. In October 2008, the National Assembly elected Ms. Mukantabam Rose as the first female Speaker of the Assembly. The next presidential elections are scheduled for 2010. In Rwanda, events of a prior decade are still fresh in the minds of many survivors and perpetrators. In 1993, after several failed efforts, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) and the government of Rwanda reached an agreement in Tanzania, referred to as the Arusha Peace Accords. The RPF joined the Rwandan government as called for in the agreement. In April 1994, the Presidents of Rwanda and Burundi, along with several senior government officials, were killed when their plane was shot down as it approached the capital of Rwanda, Kigali. Shortly after, the Rwandan military and a Hutu militia known as the Interhamwe began to systematically massacre Tutsis and moderate Hutu opposition members.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda: Setting the Scene for Elections: Two Decades of Silencing Dissent in Rwanda
    SETTING THE SCENE FOR ELECTIONS TWO DECADES OF SILENCING DISSENT IN RWANDA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: A Rwandan boy peers into a polling station in the capital Kigali on 16 September 2013 as (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. parliamentary elections kicked off. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode © TONY KARUMBA/AFP/Getty Images For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: AFR 47/6585/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 2. BACKGROUND 6 2.1 A BRIEF HISTORY OF ELECTIONS IN POST-GENOCIDE RWANDA 6 2.2 2017 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 8 3. LIMITS ON POLITICAL SPACE 10 3.1 2003: THE FIRST POST-GENOCIDE ELECTIONS 10 3.2 2010 ELECTIONS 12 3.3 SETTING THE SCENE FOR AUGUST 2017 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda: Background and Current Developments
    Rwanda: Background and Current Developments Ted Dagne Specialist in African Affairs March 23, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40115 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Rwanda: Background and Current Developments Summary In 2003, Rwanda held its first multi-party presidential and parliamentary elections in decades. President Paul Kagame of the Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF) won 95% of the votes cast, while his nearest rival, Faustin Twagiramungu, received 3.6 % of the votes cast. In the legislative elections, the ruling RPF won 73% in the 80-seat National Assembly, while the remaining seats went to RPF allies and former coalition partners. In September 2008, Rwanda held legislative elections, and the RPF won a majority of the seats. Rwandese women are now the majority in the National Assembly. In October 2008, the National Assembly elected Ms. Mukantabam Rose as the first female Speaker of the Assembly. The next presidential elections are schedule for 2010.This report will be updated as circumstances warrant. In Rwanda, events of a prior decade is still fresh in the minds of many survivors and perpetrators. In 1993, after several failed efforts, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) and the government of Rwanda reached an agreement in Tanzania, referred to as the Arusha Peace Accords. The RPF joined the Rwandan government as called for in the agreement. In April 1994, the Presidents of Rwanda and Burundi, along with several senior government officials, were killed when their plane was shot down as it approached the capital of Rwanda, Kigali. Shortly after, the Rwandan military and a Hutu militia known as the Interhamwe began to systematically massacre Tutsis and moderate Hutu opposition members.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Elections: Tightening Control in the Name of Unity
    Preparing for Elections: Tightening Control in the Name of Unity Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper May 2002 The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) is labeling possible political opponents “divisionist” and taking steps to silence them in order to ensure victory in upcoming elections. In late March President Paul Kagame warned that he would “wound” “divisionists” who threatened to undermine national unity and reprimanded foreign donors who give money to “people to teach divisions.” The Transitional National Assembly (TNA) voted unanimously to recommend dissolving the second largest political party in the country, the Mouvement Démocratique Republicain (Democratic Republican Movement, MDR) because of its “divisionism.” The MDR has been a political ally of the RPF since 1992 and a participant in the RPF-led unity government since it was established in 1994. Two high-ranking military officers singled out as “divisionist” fled the country while others were arrested or “disappeared.” A deputy of the assembly and other citizens have also “disappeared.” The government-influenced press has amplified the criticisms, sometimes attacking persons like the prime minister by name. Officials and press alike linked “divisionism” to the prospect of another genocide, thus heightening fears and tensions between the groups they profess to be unifying. Unity in the Face of Elections In July 1994 the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) defeated the Hutu Power government responsible for a genocide of at least half a million Tutsi and thousands of Hutu opposed to Hutu Power. Since that time, a transitional government of persons named by the RPF and the other political parties that signed the Arusha Accords has ruled the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rwanda Crisis Role of the International Community
    The Rwanda crisis Role of the international Community by Alfredo Jimeno Orrego for Dr Ray Smyke Webster Geneva, February 1995 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................. 4 I HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 5 A) THE ETHNIC GROUPS................................................................................................................................. 5 B) COLONIALISM .............................................................................................................................................. 6 II RECENT EVENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 7 A) THE MASSACRE OF CIVILIANS ............................................................................................................... 7 B) THE WAR ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 C) ROLE OF UNAMIR........................................................................................................................................ 9 III ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ......................................................................... 11 A) EARLY WARNING .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Elections: Tightening Control in the Name of Unity
    Preparing for Elections: Tightening Control in the Name of Unity Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper May 2003 The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) is labeling possible political opponents “divisionist” and taking steps to silence them in order to ensure victory in upcoming elections. In late March President Paul Kagame warned that he would “wound” “divisionists” who threatened to undermine national unity and reprimanded foreign donors who give money to “people to teach divisions.” The Transitional National Assembly (TNA) voted unanimously to recommend dissolving the second largest political party in the country, the Mouvement Démocratique Republicain (Democratic Republican Movement, MDR) because of its “divisionism.” The MDR has been a political ally of the RPF since 1992 and a participant in the RPF-led unity government since it was established in 1994. Two high-ranking military officers singled out as “divisionist” fled the country while others were arrested or “disappeared.” A deputy of the assembly and other citizens have also “disappeared.” The government-influenced press has amplified the criticisms, sometimes attacking persons like the prime minister by name. Officials and press alike linked “divisionism” to the prospect of another genocide, thus heightening fears and tensions between the groups they profess to be unifying. Unity in the Face of Elections In July 1994 the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) defeated the Hutu Power government responsible for a genocide of at least half a million Tutsi and thousands of Hutu opposed to Hutu Power. Since that time, a transitional government of persons named by the RPF and the other political parties that signed the Arusha Accords has ruled the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Assessment
    Rwanda, Country Information http://194.203.40.90/ppage.asp?section=191&title=Rwanda%2C%20Country%20Information RWANDA ASSESSMENT October 2001 Country Information and Policy Unit The Country Information and Policy Unit conducted a fact-finding mission to Rwanda between 5-27 March 2002. The purpose of the mission was to verify and update information contained in the October 2001 assessment and to collect additional information to assist in the determination of asylum applications from Rwandan nationals in the United Kingdom. The report of the fact-finding mission, which will also reflect other material that has been available in the meanwhile, will be published on this site as soon as it is finalised. A comprehensive country assessment incorporating this material will be produced in the normal way in October 2002. I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III HISTORY IV INSTRUMENTS OF THE STATE V HUMAN RIGHTS ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF MAJOR EVENTS 1899-2001 ANNEX B: PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX C: COMMON ABBREVIATIONS/POLITICAL GROUPS BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate of the Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them.
    [Show full text]