Sustainable Cities and Society 23 (2016) 23–36
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Sustainable Cities and Society
jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scs
Analysis of the electricity consumptions: A first step to develop a district cooling system
a a a b,∗
Luca Pampuri , Nerio Cereghetti , Davide Strepparava , Paola Caputo
a
Istituto di Sostenibilità Applicata All’ambiente Costruito, Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana, Campus Trevano, Via Trevano,
CH-6952 Canobbio, Switzerland
b
Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering Department, Politecnico di Milano, Via Bonardi 9, 20133 Milano, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Space cooling represents an increasingly and often understated important energy demand even in moder-
Received 23 December 2015
ate climates. Usually space cooling is provided at building level by electric driven appliances. This implies
Received in revised form 17 February 2016
several problems in summer due to the peak of electricity consumption.
Accepted 18 February 2016
Analytical methods for investigating energy consumption due to space cooling demand at urban or
Available online 26 February 2016
regional level are needed. The research here reported is focused on the territory of southern Canton
Ticino, in Switzerland, and is based on real data provided by the local electricity company. The research
Keywords:
investigates the electricity consumptions of big users in order to verify if there is a significant cooling
District cooling
demand, how this demand affects electricity consumptions and if this demand can be satisfied by district
Electricity consumption
cooling (DC). The possible DC connections were selected by a defined procedure and mapped by GIS, as
Energy consumers
Clustering well as the density of the electricity consumption and the peak power. Three main areas suitable for DC
Energy signature were identified. The analysis demonstrates that DC could represent an alternative to electric driven air
GIS conditioning systems, with benefits for the consumers, the utilities and the environment.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction Despite the energy efficiency measures developed in Europe and
in Switzerland, the global energy consumption in buildings con-
The path to carbon neutral communities represent long lasting tinues to rise. In particular, considering the focus of the present
and urgent challenges for all governments. For example, the EU has paper, BFE (2015) stated that energy consumption related to air
approved the “Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon conditioning had increased of 39% from 2000 to 2013. Many author-
economy in 2050” (EU COM112/2011, 2011) with the objective to itative researches have investigated space cooling in terms of
reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80–95% by 2050 in compar- predicting cooling loads in buildings, but a significant level of
ison to those of 1990. Analogously Switzerland has approved the complexity is recognized in this framework as reported also in
Energy Strategy 2050 that includes the main aims for the energy Damnu, Wanga, Zhai, and Li (2013). The present research sug-
policy towards 2050 (BFE, 2015). Among these aims, as conse- gests another approach, that starts from the available electricity
quences of abandoning nuclear power, a reduction of the electricity consumption, since space cooling demand is usually provided by
consumption is required. compression chillers. The increasing of the electricity demand due
Energy statistics show that European and Swiss buildings are to space cooling is in contradiction with the defined energy targets,
responsible of more than the 40% of the total final energy con- as empathized also by the media during the hot summer of 2015
sumption (Odyssee, 2012; BFE, 2015), representing an important (IEA, 2015).
energy saving opportunity. More in details, energy statistics show In general, it is difficult to obtain reliable data about electric-
that buildings space heating accounts for 68% and 71% of end-use ity consumption for a large number of users (Caputo, Costa, &
energy consumption respectively in Europe and Switzerland, while Zanotto, 2013). Furthermore, with few exceptions, these data are
lighting and electrical appliances account for 15%, water heating for available as a whole, without the details of electricity consump-
12% and cooking for 4% (Odyssee, 2012; BFE, 2015). tion for cooling demand. The evaluation of the summer surplus due
to space cooling is difficult because often data do not cover a full
year and significant sample of users. For these reasons, a methodol-
∗ ogy for analyzing this hidden energy demand and for studying how
Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 0223999488; fax: +39 0223999484.
E-mail address: [email protected] (P. Caputo). it can be satisfied without affecting electricity consumptions was
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.02.015
2210-6707/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
24 L. Pampuri et al. / Sustainable Cities and Society 23 (2016) 23–36
Fig. 1. Territorial context of the study (left) and map of municipalities supplied by AIL (in red) in Canton Ticino (right). (For interpretation of the references to color in this
figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
•
developed. The present paper reports the results of a research con- conventional compressor-based cooling;
•
ducted on the territory of southern Canton Ticino, in Switzerland absorption cooling, transforming waste heat into cooling;
•
(Fig. 1). Even though this territory is small, it can be considered rep- free cooling, using cool ambient air or cool water from the ocean,
resentative of a large arear with similar climatic and morphological lake or river.
conditions. The research starts from the analysis of real data pro-
vided by the local electricity company (AIL SA, 2015) that supplies
Euroheat and Power (2006) affirms that a DC system can reach
electricity to most of southern Canton Ticino (Fig. 1). Following the
efficiencies typically 5 or even 10 times higher than the efficiencies
methodology reported in Section 3, the research investigates the
of electric chillers, as it is shown also in Table 1, where primary
electricity consumptions of big users in order to verify how space
resource factors (PRF) are adopted. Primary energy refers to energy
cooling affects electricity consumptions and if it can be satisfied
that has not been subjected to any conversion or transformation
by district cooling (DC). The analysis demonstrates that, despite
process (e.g. oil in the oil fields). Primary energy may be resource
the temperate climatic conditions, there is a significant consump-
energy or renewable energy or a combination of both. Resource
tion of electricity due to the space cooling demand, especially in
refers to a source depleted by extraction (e.g. fossil fuels) and
the tertiary sector and that DC can be an efficient alternative to
renewable energy to a source that is not depleted by extraction
conventional cooling devices.
(e.g. biomass, solar). The use of the primary resource factor (PRF)
enables to measure the savings and losses occurring from energy
generation to the delivery to the building. The primary resource
2. District cooling as an alternative to conventional cooling
devices factor expresses the ratio of the non-regenerative resource energy
required for the building to the final energy supplied to the build-
ing. The primary resource factor represents the energy delivery but
El Barky and Dyrelund (2013) report an interesting summary
excludes the renewable energy component of primary energy.
about the advantages of moving from conventional space cooling
Since southern Canton Ticino has several natural sources suit-
devices, chillers operating at building level, to DC. The operation of
able for DC such as the Lake of Lugano and several local rivers, free
electric chillers implies large investments in power peak plants and
cooling (i.e. the adoption of cold water for cooling purposes) could
even for blackouts in many cities around the world. A light reduc-
be the most appropriate technology in this case.
tion of the peak demand can be achieved in high thermal capacity
buildings, by other measures and users behavior, not always appli-
cable. 2.1. District cooling potential in Europe and Switzerland
In case of proper morphologic, climatic and density features of
the built environment, DC can be adopted as an alternative to con- DC still represents an uncommon technology for providing cool-
ventional cooling devices. As well explained by El Barky (2013), DC ing. For example, the current DC market share represents only 1–2%
can bring advantages similar to those of district heating (DH) due of the cooling market in Europe and DC is almost not adopted in
to centralized production (i.e. risk reduction for the individual con- Switzerland. Despite of this, there are interesting examples in Asian
sumers and cost effectiveness for the energy supply companies). DC and European cities (IEA, 2015; Xiang-li, Lin, & Hai-wen, 2010), i.e.
can contribute to use local sources that otherwise would be wasted. Stockholm, Helsinki etc.
Euroheat and Power (2006) reports that DC is normally pro- Euroheat and Power (2006) estimated that the European cool-
duced by means of one or more of the following technologies that ing market would be around 660 TWh/y in the period 2012 to
can be also combined: 2020. This corresponds to an electricity consumption of 260 TWh,
L. Pampuri et al. / Sustainable Cities and Society 23 (2016) 23–36 25
Table 1
Performance of different cooling solutions (Euroheat and Power, 2006).
Solutions EER PRF
Conventional room and central air conditioning 1.5–3.5 1.7–0.7
District cooling solutions
Industrial chillers with efficient condenser cooling and/or recovered heat to district heating 5–8 0.5–0.3
Free cooling/industrial chillers 8–25 0.3–0.1
Free cooling and cooling spills 25–40 0.1–0.06
Absorption chiller driven from heat from waste or renewable sources 20–35 0.13–0.07
EER: (Seasonal System) Energy Efficiency Ratio. This states the output of yearly exploitable cooling energy per unit of yearly electrical energy input in the system.
PRF: Primary Resource Factor.
considering a seasonal system energy efficiency ratio of 2.5. There- On the other hand, the impact of DC on local infrastructures and
fore, according to Eurostat (2015), it is possible to summarize that finance is very important. DC requires significant investments, a
electricity consumed due to cooling needs represents about the stable policy framework, and collaboration between various stake-
8% of the yearly electricity generation in EU. These data demon- holders. This means that DC should be promoted in the framework
strate the large potential of penetration for DC in Europe and in of appropriate conditions. In this case, DC can become a very impor-
Switzerland, a small country in the European Alpine region. Since tant tool toward improving energy efficiency, reducing greenhouse
average temperatures in Switzerland are likely to increase due to gases emissions and renewable energies integration (Bjerregaard,
climate change, it is expected that energy demand for space heating 2013).
will decrease while space cooling, which is currently almost non-
existent in private households in Switzerland, is likely to increase.
3. Methodology
As recommended by Christenson, Manz, and Gyalistras (2006) and
in CH2014-Impacts (2014), this phenomenon should not be under-
In the previous sections, it is stated that the cooling demand is
estimated. This last study reports that Swiss heating degree days
constantly increasing and that it strongly affects the consumption
(HDD) are going to decrease from 5% to 20% in 2050 in compari-
of electricity. Moreover, it is stated that electricity consumption
son to the reference period (1980–2009). Conversely, in the same
due to cooling deserves to be deeply analyzed. This paper reports
study it is projected that Swiss cooling degree days (CDD) are
a method for exploring cooling demand of big electricity users at
going to increase from 100% to 400% in 2050 in comparison to the
regional scale, southern Canton Ticino, and focuses on DC potential
same reference period. Analogous considerations are reported in
in the same region.
the framework of other interesting researches in Europe (Taseska,
The case study is very interesting because it originates from
Markovska, & Callaway, 2012; Berger et al., 2014).
a research supported by the local electricity company (AIL SA,
For these reasons studies about how the increasing cooling
2015) that supplies electricity to most of southern Canton Ticino,
demand can be satisfied reducing its impact on the energy systems
as reported in Section 1 and Fig. 1. This case attests the inter-
are needed.
est of energy utilities in DC underlining the innovation and the
replicability of the methodology. Furthermore, it represents a pre-
cious occasion for managing real data and for foreseeing potential
2.2. Main benefits of district cooling
synergies among DC, DH and distribute generation. To develop a
hypothetical DC project, it is fundamental to map the potential
The phenomenon of electric summer peak due to cooling is
customers in a certain area. Therefore, since the beginning of the
stressed also by Jing, Jiang, Wu, Tang, and Hua (2014), underlining
analysis, the chosen methodology includes an important use of GIS.
the high operating costs.
GIS supported tools are very attractive for energy utilities because
Interesting evaluations about benefits related to DC as an alter-
allow a quick overview of the potential operations in a defined
native to building size electric driven air conditioning system are
territory.
reported in Bjerregaard (2013), De Carli, Galgaro, Pasqualetto, and
Zarrella (2014) and Gang, Wang, Gao, and Xiao (2015).
3.1. Datasets and selection of the users
As main benefit, DC can contribute to smooth the demand curve
of electricity, especially if free cooling, such as rivers and lakes, or
AIL SA provided a geo-referred dataset of the electricity con-
surplus heat through absorption chillers were adopted.
sumptions among all the users of the served territory. As big
El Barky (2013) reports an interesting summary of benefits of
electricity users, only consumers with more than 100 MWh/y were
DC on users, utility companies and communities as follows:
taken into account (AIL, 2014a). In general, they are tertiary or
industrial users. Additionally, other two available databases were
•
benefits for users: cost reduction (in particular in case of free considered: the federal register of buildings (RBD, 2014) and the
cooling or use of waste heat), no noise from chillers, reduced risk list of the users connected to the water grid for industrial uses,
reparations, better certification of the energy performance of the provided in AIL (2014b).
building and available space on rooftop and basement for other AIL (2014a) reports the list of users with a yearly electricity
purposes; consumption bigger than 100 MWh, with the address of the users.
•
benefits for utility companies: a new profitable market, a new The electric consumptions are recorded every 15 min. The data
product and service in portfolio, synergies between power, heat collected demonstrate that there are 957 users with an electric
and cooling production, especially in case of distributed genera- consumption over 100 MWh/y. This corresponds to a total con-
tion; sumption of 487,500 MWh/y.
•
benefits for communities: environmental and energy improve- In the RBD (2014) are listed the most important data for describ-
ments related to a more efficient use of the resources, possibility ing buildings and dwellings in addition to their address.
of creating synergies in the energy and infrastructural planning AIL (2014b) reports data about water taken from the lake
of their territory. of Lugano and supplied for industrial uses. Approximately
26 L. Pampuri et al. / Sustainable Cities and Society 23 (2016) 23–36
3
6 million m per year of water are extracted at a temperature of temperature drastically decrease in winter season (electric driven
◦
about 7–9 C. The data include technical information about the heating system).
users (addresses, type of uses, etc.). In the analyzed case study, the energy signatures were provided
The first step of the research regarded the identification of users as a graph representing the daily mean power in function of the
that surely present a significant cooling demand and their location, daily mean temperature. At the end of this phase of analysis, the
in order to verify the feasibility of a DC system. following typologies of users were founded:
Data were elaborated in order to carry out a classification of the
•
users based on their activities (mainly of the tertiary sector). users without heating and cooling demands provided by elec-
First, some big users were excluded from the list of hypothetical tric driven systems. In this case, electricity consumptions are
cooling consumers because of their activity (if the activity of the meanly uniform throughout the year. These users were obviously
user implies a negligible cooling demand) or because of inconsis- excluded from the further phases of the analysis;
•
tencies or lacks encountered during the data elaboration. users with cooling demand provided by electric driven systems.
In particular, the users related to the following activities (AIL, In this case, electricity consumptions increase during the summer
2014a), were excluded: aqueducts, temporary connections, breed- season;
•
ing and stables, gas cabinets, construction sites, churches and users with heating and cooling demand provided by electric
convents, docks, private garages, plants for water treatment, incin- driven systems. In this case, electricity consumptions increase
erators, landfills and public lighting. during the winter and the summer season.
Second, the users connected to the water grid for industrial
uses were excluded from the list of hypothetical cooling consumers
The last two typologies, exemplified in Fig. 4, were considered
because it is conceivable to assume that they already satisfy their
in the further steps of the research.
cooling demand using industrial water, since this service is cost
effective.
3.3. Map of the electricity consumers with cooling demands
Electricity data of the users that pass the selection were then
elaborated. In particular, in order to investigate cooling demands,
At the end of the data elaboration process described in Sections
electricity data were analyzed referring to outside temperature.
3.1 and 3.2, it was possible to define the final list of users with
The period from April to September was considered because in
space cooling demand and to provide a map of their location by
these months the heating demand in Ticino is negligible, so, even
GIS. This is reported in Fig. 5, where the green dots represent users
if there were electric driven heating systems, the electricity con-
with cooling demand, the red dots represent users without cooling
sumption would not be affected by heating. Hypothetical space
demand and the yellow dots represent users that have to be further
cooling users should have electric consumptions that increase pro-
investigated. This methodological step is fundament in planning DC
portionally when the outdoor temperature rises. Therefore, users
systems as confirmed also by the technical literature. For example,
with electric consumptions not depending on outside temperature
Euroheat and Power (2006) stated that in order to identify the most
were excluded from the analysis, as explained in Section 3.2.
optimal location of a new DC plant within a certain area, it can be
Finally, through the support of GIS, the farthest users (far more
valuable to use an automated mapping tool. The estimated cooling
than 500 m from other four potential connections) were excluded
demand and geographical location of each building in a defined area
from the analysis because their connection to a DC system is not
permit to calculate also the economic difference between a con-
feasible due to the long distance from the hypothetical grid, as
ventional cooling system and a DC system. This operation includes
explained in Section 3.3.
a classification of building size, cooling demand and building type.
The process of the selection is shown in Fig. 2.
Moreover, a careful consideration of the local natural resources can
really increase both profitability and energy efficiency.
The GIS map of the locations of the potential cooling user in
3.2. Energy accountability and external temperature
the analyzed territory (Fig. 5) permits also to define a geographic
criterion for the selection of users suitable for DC systems. This cri-
A precious help in defining how electricity consumptions are
terion serves to detect a minimum space cooling density in order
affected by cooling needs is represented by energy accountability.
to define where the DC grid is technically and economically feasi-
In Switzerland, energy accountability is considered as an impor-
ble. Considering the characteristics of the climate and of the built
tant tool for analyzing, monitoring and controlling the energy
environment, the following criterion was adopted: each user can be
demands in buildings and the related economic impacts. The main
considered as a hypothetical connection of the DC system if there
purpose of energy accountability is the continuous monitoring
are at least other four users within a distance of 500 m as reported
of energy fluxes and related costs. This approach also permits to
in Fig. 6, with grey buffers. This preliminary criterion can be mod-
plan energy retrofit interventions and other energy management
ified or improved in the following phases of developments of the
improvements. Energy accountability includes also interesting rep-
research, as reported in Section 4.
resentations of data by schemes and graphs. Among these, there is
the useful representation of the energy signature (Zhao & Magoulès,
3.4. Definition of cooling profiles
2012), a graphs that reports on the abscissas the outdoor weekly
mean temperatures and on the ordinates the weekly energy con-
At the end of the data elaboration described in Sections 3.1, 3.2
sumptions (heat or power).
and 3.3, it was possible to edit the final map of users for which space
The energy signature of a building can be compared with defined
cooling is supposedly provided by electric driven systems. The fol-
typical curves, as reported in Fig. 3.
lowing step of the research regards the definition of the “cooling
In particular, type 1 means that energy consumptions are not
1
profile” (CP) of each user, including the calculation of the elec-
affected by the trend of the outdoor temperature; type 2 indi-
tricity consumed and of the maximum power due to space cooling
cates that energy consumptions linearly increase with the outdoor
demand.
temperature during all the year; type 3 indicates that energy con-
sumptions linearly increase with the outdoor temperature only in
summer season (electric driven cooling system) and type 4 indi-
1
cates that energy consumptions linearly increase when the outdoor The profile of the electricity adopted for space cooling.
L. Pampuri et al. / Sustainable Cities and Society 23 (2016) 23–36 27
Selec on of suitable
Sele c on of users with Elimina on of users
Data cleaning users depending on
remo te metering without energy data
their typology
Eli mina on of users
Calcula on and GIS map whose energy Elimin a on of users
GIS ma p of suitable
of cooling energy and consump on does not co nnected to industrial
users
power depe nd on outdoor water net
temp erature
Calcula on and GIS map
of possible DC areas
Fig. 2. Scheme of the selection of the electricity consumers potentially interested in DC.
Fig. 3. Typologies of energy signatures.
First, for each user the electricity data provided by AIL (2014a) day). The basic idea of this step is to separate days in sets related
were analyzed taking into account the period from April to to cooling demand and others without this contribution.
September 2013. As explained in Section 3.1, during this period Data clustering is performed using K-means algorithm (Arthur
in Ticino heating demand is negligible, so the clustering process, & Vassilvitskii, 2007). This algorithm converges to a good solution
described in the following, is not affected by consumptions related (not necessarily the optimum) given a number of clusters (k). The
to heating. Conversely in the same period it is possible to have days algorithm output is constituted by k clusters, each of them defined
with or without cooling demand. by the belonging days and a centroid as mean reference. In this case,
The methodology for cooling profiles (CPs) calculation of a single a centroid is a 24-h profile with 96 values. The generic centroid’s
user is constituted by the sequence of the following steps: element i is the mean of the corresponding i values related to the
cluster’s days.
•
Data clustering: electricity consumption data are analyzed to Therefore to the fact that k is an input, the followed strategy
obtain meaningful sets of days; was to develop an algorithm that performs K-means more times
•
Clusters grouping: clusters obtained in the step 1 are grouped with k higher and higher and then to choose the best solution. To
®
considering their distribution over the days of the week and the implement this iterative approach a MATLAB script (scout) was
period; developed. The following table reports the input parameters of the
•
CPs calculation: the cooling profiles are calculated using the clus- script.
ters groups defined in the previous step. Scout permits to perform K-means for (maxNumClusters-
minNumClusters) times, with k starting from minNumClusters until
3.4.1. Data clustering maxNumClusters, discard solutions with clusters related to popula-
For each user the electricity data in the period April–September tions smaller than minPopCluster and choose the best result in the
(182 days) are analyzed with a resolution of 15 min (96 values per remaining subset. The last choice is actuated considering as best
28 L. Pampuri et al. / Sustainable Cities and Society 23 (2016) 23–36
Fig. 4. Examples of energy signatures that depend on outdoor temperature: electricity for cooling and heating (above); electricity for cooling (below).
•
solution the one minimizing the standard deviations’ sum related G1, composed by centroids 2, 4 and 6. It shows a schedule of
to clustered data. operation from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. step up approximately;
•
Each K-means running is performed with a replication equal to G2, constituted by centroids 3 and 5. It shows a schedule of oper-
50 to avoid the risk of local minima. As said before, the cluster- ation from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. approximately;
•
ing algorithm can converge to a local minimum, depending on the G3, with centroid 1. It shows a schedule of operation is stable
initial conditions. The algorithm is launched more times by replica- approximately constant all over the day.
tions and the optimum solution can then be obtained reasonably.
Fig. 7 shows the centroids found by scout algorithm for a generic Then the distribution of clusters elements is analyzed taking
user. In this case the solution is represented by six clusters. into account the days of the week (Fig. 8) and the daily average of
Lugano’s temperature during the period April–September (Fig. 9).
3.4.2. Clusters grouping Fig. 8 shows how G2 is strongly related to Thursdays, G3 to
Once performed the clustering and calculated the centroids, the Sundays and G1 to the other cases. Therefore, it is reasonable to
second step to obtain CPs is to find associations between clusters. establish two types of CP, one relating to the clusters G1 and another
Considering Fig. 8 is reasonable to divide them into the following concerning the clusters G2. No CP is considered for G3, being con-
three groups: stituted only by a centroid.
L. Pampuri et al. / Sustainable Cities and Society 23 (2016) 23–36 29
Fig. 5. Location of the potential DC users (green dots: users with cooling demand; red dots: users without cooling demand; yellow dots: users which have to be further
investigated). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 6. Analysis of the density of the cooling demand in relation to a buffers of 500 (grey circles around each user).
30 L. Pampuri et al. / Sustainable Cities and Society 23 (2016) 23–36
Fig. 7. Centroids related to a clustering solution for a single use.
•
On the other hand, Fig. 9 shows that G1 centroids are distributed The complete automation of CPs calculation has to be imple-
in cool (cluster 6), warm (cluster 2) and hot (cluster 4) days. A sim- mented, reasonably focusing the methodology on a smaller set
ilar result regards G2 centroids, with cluster 5 related to warm/hot of users and without considering their geographical distribution.
days and cluster 3 to the cool ones. Actually the methodologies explained in Section 3.4.1 and 3.4.3
are automatic, but not clusters grouping (Section 3.4.2);
•
Once the previous automation is complete, an uncertainty anal-
3.4.3. Cooling profiles calculation
ysis has to be actuated for errors estimation.
The third step is to calculate the cooling profiles as the difference
between centroids related to hot/warm and cool days, considering
the weekdays grouping described in Section 3.4.2. The following
4. Results
equations report the CPs definitions for the solution shown in Fig. 7.
Section 3 describes the procedure aimed at defining the electric-
CP1 (t) = Centroid4 (t) − Centroid6 (t) (1)
ity consumption and peak power due to space cooling requirement
CP2 (t) = Centroid2 (t) − Centroid6 (t) (2) of big users in the territory of Canton Ticino served by AIL SA.
This important result has to be integrated by other elaborations
t =
CP3 Centroid5 t − Centroid3 t (3)
( ) ( ) ( ) necessary to study the feasibility of a DC grid. Powers and ener-
gies described in Section 3 were represented by a GIS map; then
CP1 is obtained by clusters 4 and 6 and is related to hot days
their density was calculated as energy and power per surface unit,
of the week except Thursdays and Saturdays. CP2 is similar, but
considering a grid of one hectare. This elaboration permits to have
related to warm days. Instead, the third cooling profile is associated
an idea of the area in which DC could actually be a promising and to hot Thursdays.
effective technology.
It is important to consider that clusters 6 and 3 can be seen as
The authors have verified the technical literature in order to find
the minimum bands of power consumption, related to all types of
benchmarks useful in this phase of the analysis, but they became
demand except cooling (i.e. lighting and appliances). Indeed these
aware that the data founded were not directly usable. The consulted
two clusters have been obtained considering days with negligible
references are mainly related to analogous criteria for planning
cooling demand (Fig. 9).
DH grids (Aste, Buzzetti, & Caputo, 2015; Brum, Erickson, Jenkins,
For each CP the daily electric consumption for cooling purposes
& Kornbluth, 2015) that are more common than DC grids, espe-
(Ecool) and the related peak power (Pmax) are calculated with the
cially in Europe. Based on an authoritative study provided by the
following equations:
⎡ ⎤ Swiss Federal Office for Energy (Oppermann, Gutzwiller, & Müller,