Positive Neuroscience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Positive Neuroscience A white paper prepared for the John Templeton Foundation by the Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley February 2019 Positive Neuroscience Written by Summer Allen, Ph.D. ggsc.berkeley.edu greatergood.berkeley.edu Positive Neuroscience EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Showing care and affection to our loved ones, acting compassionately toward others who are suffering, being moved by an emotional song, and being resilient in the face of stressful situations—these feelings and behaviors are all crucial parts of being human and living a good life. But where do they come from? How do our brains help foster our capacity to flourish in the face of adversity, show kindness to those in despair, and enjoy life to the fullest? An emerging field of study—positive neuroscience—aims to answer these questions. Positive neuroscience focuses on the nervous system mechanisms that underlie human flourishing and well-being. This emerging field of study was significantly bolstered by the John Templeton Founda- tion’s $5.8 million Positive Neuroscience Project, an initiative led by Martin E.P. Seligman. The project included the Templeton Positive Neuroscience Awards competition, which awarded funding to 15 groups conducting research at the intersection of neuroscience and positive psychology. This white paper focuses on the research that has emanated from these awards. In particular, it discusses the neuroscience of social attachment and relationships (“the social brain”), compassion and generosity (“the compassionate brain”), musical talent and musical appreciation (“the musical brain”), and emotional regulation and resiliency (“the resilient brain”). The Social Brain abilities to form attachments to other people? Humans are social animals, and with good reason: Addressing this question typically involves Relationships are key to our happiness and looking at our earliest attachments in life: health—and to our survival. Is our social nature Decades of studies on rodents and non-human rooted at least in part in our neurobiology? And primates have identified several hormones and if so, what biological mechanisms underlie our brain regions that are likely involved in forming Executive Summary 2 and maintaining the bonds between parents A relatively new line of research has focused and children. Indeed, research suggests that on the “social touch” system—a touch pathway the human brain is wired for parental care. For that is particularly sensitive to touch that feels example, human neuroimaging studies have pleasant and which is often involved in social found that there are unique patterns of brain interactions. Remarkably, studies have found activity that respond to baby cries and photos of that the same brain areas that responded when children. These include brain areas known to be people had their arms touched softly at a pleasant involved in empathy and reward. speed also responded when those people viewed Other studies suggest that becoming a parent other people receiving a similar touch—suggest- changes the brain’s structure and function. In ing that this may be a form of “neural empathy” addition, there seem to be brain activity differenc- that helps us to interpret the relationships and es between more and less sensitive mothers and alliances among people in our proximity. more and less involved fathers. Intriguingly, some work suggests that parental brain activity when The Compassionate Brain children are babies may influence children’s later We tend to think that “human nature” is social and emotional abilities. For example, in one synonymous with violence, selfishness, and study, fathers who had more positive thoughts aggression—and that those behaviors are our about parenting their one-month-old—and great- evolutionary and biological legacy. But in recent er brain activation in response to their child’s cries years, neuroscience research actually suggests a in regions associated with sensory information more complicated story. processing and parental motivation—also had Studies of the brain have identified a neurobi- toddlers with better socio-emotional skills, such ological basis to compassion and generosity. They as empathy and positive peer relations. have identified areas of the brain associated with Many of the same mechanisms that are kind, helpful—or “prosocial”— thoughts, feelings, involved in these early bonds—including and behaviors. For example, one recent neuroim- hormones, brain circuits, and synced behav- aging study found that the brain circuits involved ior and neural responses—also underlie other in two gut-level responses to seeing people suffer- relationships. For example, one study found that ing—distress and tenderness—could be dissociat- both maternal and romantic love activated some ed from one another, and that activity in either one of the same areas of the brain’s reward system; could predict charitable behavior. Another line of another study found that romantic partners research demonstrates that people’s brains assign displayed more synchronized behavior and an inherent “value” to generosity and fairness: brain responses than did strangers—mecha- We experience vicarious rewards when we view nisms that are also thought to be involved in the others benefiting. parent-child bond. This suggests these biological Other research has examined activity in the mechanisms play a central role in our relation- brains of so-called “extraordinary altruists”— ships, across stages of life. people who have voluntarily donated a kidney Executive Summary 3 to a total stranger. Studies have found that these nary musical abilities of two unique populations: people have exceptionally strong neural responses people with absolute (or “perfect”) pitch—who to fearful faces, suggesting that they are especially can identify musical pitches without a refer- attuned to the suffering of others. ence—and people with sound-color synes- Through neuroscience studies, researchers have thesia—for whom hearing particular musical also identified a number of factors that seem likely sounds triggers perception of colors. to increase or decrease compassion and generosi- Additionally, other research suggests that ty such as how we perceive other people, whether hyperconnectivity may also underlie people’s we’re primed to think of ourselves as individuals or aesthetic responses to music. In one study, people as part of a group, and how much we care about who experienced chills while listening to music similarities between ourselves and other people. had thicker white fiber bundles connecting their There is also some evidence to suggest that stress— brain’s auditory areas to brain areas involved in either felt personally or “caught” from someone social and emotional processing and reward. else—may inspire prosocial behavior. Additionally, because similar brain areas are Evidence also suggests that compassion is involved in our emotional responses to music a skill that can be practiced and improved. For and experiences of empathy, this may suggest that example, one study found that two weeks of daily these two experiences are related in some way. compassion training increased activity in brain regions involved in emotion regulation and The Resilient Brain social cognition. Participants who completed We are constantly barraged with stimuli and this training also gave more money to someone situations that can evoke emotion. Walking who had been snubbed in a previous round of a down a city street, we may see people hugging money distribution game than participants who (or fighting), hear a baby crying, smell food completed memory training did. that reminds us of our childhood, and receive a text with sad news—all within a few seconds. The Musical Brain Over the past few decades, neuroscientists have Making and enjoying music is an essential compo- published hundreds of studies exploring how our nent of human cultures across the globe. Yet brains respond to emotional stimuli and how we despite its longstanding importance to humanity, can improve our ability to thrive in the face of researchers have only recently started to under- stressful situations. stand how the brain allows us to produce, under- Neuroimaging studies have found that a part stand, and appreciate music. This emerging line of the brain’s limbic system called the amygdala of neuroscience research has started to produce responds to both positive and negative emotion- valuable insights into humans’ relationship to music. al stimuli. However, people vary in the extent In particular, studies have found that brain to which their amygdalae respond to different “hyperconnectivity”—that is, increased struc- stimuli. For example, one study found that the tural and/or functional connectivity between amygdalae of happier participants responded specific brain regions—underlies the extraordi- more to positive images than the amygdalae of Executive Summary 4 less happy people, but there was no relation- Besides cognitive reappraisal, research ship between people’s happiness levels and their also suggests that certain forms of meditation amygdala responses to negative images. These can improve mood and change how the brain results suggest that happier people are more responds to emotional stimuli. For example, one motivated to see opportunities in their environ- study found that short-term mindfulness training ments, but that they don’t wear “rose-colored increased the functional connectivity between the glasses” that prevent their brains from recogniz- amygdala and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ing nearby negative
Recommended publications
  • Finalist Symposium
    TEMPLETON SCIENCE OF PROSPECTION AWARDS The Prospective Psychology Project University of Pennsylvania Positive Psychology Center FINALIST SYMPOSIUM: AUGUST 4–5, 201 4 37 01 Market Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA 191 04 www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu Special Thanks to The John Templeton Foundation TEMPLETON SCIENCE OF PROSPECTION AWARDS Table of Contents Sponsors ...............................................1 Science of Prospection Steering Committee ..........2 Symposium Agenda Overview ........................6 Day One Presentation Schedule ......................8 Day Two Presentation Schedule .....................10 Science of Prospection Proposal Abstracts ...........12 SPONSORS The Prospective Psychology Project Some of the goals of Positive Psychology are to build a science that supports: Supported by a grant from the John Templeton • Families and schools that allow children to flourish Foundation, the University of Pennsylvania Positive • Workplaces that foster satisfaction and high Psychology Center has established the Prospective productivity Psychology Project to advance the scientific understanding of prospection, or the mental • Communities that encourage civic engagement representation of possible futures. To foster this • Therapists who identify and nurture their patients’ new field of research, the Prospective Psychology strengths Project announced the Templeton Science of • The teaching of Positive Psychology Prospection Awards competition in 2013. The awards will encourage research aimed at understanding • Dissemination of
    [Show full text]
  • The Baseline Structure of the Enteric Nervous System and Its Role in Parkinson’S Disease
    life Review The Baseline Structure of the Enteric Nervous System and Its Role in Parkinson’s Disease Gianfranco Natale 1,2,* , Larisa Ryskalin 1 , Gabriele Morucci 1 , Gloria Lazzeri 1, Alessandro Frati 3,4 and Francesco Fornai 1,4 1 Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (F.F.) 2 Museum of Human Anatomy “Filippo Civinini”, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy 3 Neurosurgery Division, Human Neurosciences Department, Sapienza University of Rome, 00135 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 4 Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.) Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is provided with a peculiar nervous network, known as the enteric nervous system (ENS), which is dedicated to the fine control of digestive functions. This forms a complex network, which includes several types of neurons, as well as glial cells. Despite extensive studies, a comprehensive classification of these neurons is still lacking. The complexity of ENS is magnified by a multiple control of the central nervous system, and bidirectional communication between various central nervous areas and the gut occurs. This lends substance to the complexity of the microbiota–gut–brain axis, which represents the network governing homeostasis through nervous, endocrine, immune, and metabolic pathways. The present manuscript is dedicated to Citation: Natale, G.; Ryskalin, L.; identifying various neuronal cytotypes belonging to ENS in baseline conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tor Wager Diana L
    Tor Wager Diana L. Taylor Distinguished Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College Email: [email protected] https://wagerlab.colorado.edu Last Updated: July, 2019 Executive summary ● Appointments: Faculty since 2004, starting as Assistant Professor at Columbia ​ University. Associate Professor in 2009, moved to University of Colorado, Boulder in 2010; Professor since 2014. 2019-Present: Diana L. Taylor Distinguished Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Dartmouth College. ● Publications: 240 publications with >50,000 total citations (Google Scholar), 11 papers ​ cited over 1000 times. H-index = 79. Journals include Science, Nature, New England Journal of Medicine, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron, Nature Methods, PNAS, Psychological Science, PLoS Biology, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Nature Reviews Neurology, Nature Medicine, Journal of Neuroscience. ● Funding: Currently principal investigator on 3 NIH R01s, and co-investigator on other ​ collaborative grants. Past funding sources include NIH, NSF, Army Research Institute, Templeton Foundation, DoD. P.I. on 4 R01s, 1 R21, 1 RC1, 1 NSF. ● Awards: Awards include NSF Graduate Fellowship, MacLean Award from American ​ Psychosomatic Society, Colorado Faculty Research Award, “Rising Star” from American Psychological Society, Cognitive Neuroscience Society Young Investigator Award, Web of Science “Highly Cited Researcher”, Fellow of American Psychological Society. Two patents on research products. ● Outreach: >300 invited talks at universities/international conferences since 2005. ​ Invited talks in Psychology, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Psychiatry, Neurology, Anesthesiology, Radiology, Medical Anthropology, Marketing, and others. Media outreach: Featured in New York Times, The Economist, NPR (Science Friday and Radiolab), CBS Evening News, PBS special on healing, BBC, BBC Horizons, Fox News, 60 Minutes, others.
    [Show full text]
  • Distance Learning Program Anatomy of the Human Brain/Sheep Brain Dissection
    Distance Learning Program Anatomy of the Human Brain/Sheep Brain Dissection This guide is for middle and high school students participating in AIMS Anatomy of the Human Brain and Sheep Brain Dissections. Programs will be presented by an AIMS Anatomy Specialist. In this activity students will become more familiar with the anatomical structures of the human brain by observing, studying, and examining human specimens. The primary focus is on the anatomy, function, and pathology. Those students participating in Sheep Brain Dissections will have the opportunity to dissect and compare anatomical structures. At the end of this document, you will find anatomical diagrams, vocabulary review, and pre/post tests for your students. The following topics will be covered: 1. The neurons and supporting cells of the nervous system 2. Organization of the nervous system (the central and peripheral nervous systems) 4. Protective coverings of the brain 5. Brain Anatomy, including cerebral hemispheres, cerebellum and brain stem 6. Spinal Cord Anatomy 7. Cranial and spinal nerves Objectives: The student will be able to: 1. Define the selected terms associated with the human brain and spinal cord; 2. Identify the protective structures of the brain; 3. Identify the four lobes of the brain; 4. Explain the correlation between brain surface area, structure and brain function. 5. Discuss common neurological disorders and treatments. 6. Describe the effects of drug and alcohol on the brain. 7. Correctly label a diagram of the human brain National Science Education
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan for Vanderbilt's Mental Health and Wellbeing
    STRATEGIC PLAN FOR Vanderbilt’s Mental Health and Wellbeing by the Chancellor’s Strategic Planning Committee DECEMBER 2017 STRATEGIC PLAN FOR VANDERBILT’S MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 Charge, Process, Timeline .................................................................................................. 5 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 8 1. For All Vanderbilt Community Members ...........................................................................8 2.For Students .....................................................................................................................11 3.For Faculty and Staff ........................................................................................................13 4.To Create a Culture that Supports Mental Wellbeing ......................................................15 5.To Position Vanderbilt as a Leader in Mental Health Research and Discovery ................18 Closing ............................................................................................................................. 19 Appendices ...................................................................................................................... 20 Appendix A—Subcommittee Report: Assessment of Campus Resources .........................20 Appendix B—Subcommittee Report:
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Psychology Center Annual Report 2017
    Positive Psychology Center Annual Report May 23, 2017 Martin Seligman, Director Peter Schulman, Executive Director Contents: Significant Developments New Books New Research New Resilience Training Contracts Outreach Programs Organization and Operation PPC Personnel PPC Advisory Board PPC Advisors Activities Research Summaries Education: Graduate and Undergraduate Resilience Training Programs Research Publications 2015-17 This is a report on the activities of the Positive Psychology Center (PPC). The PPC was officially created November 7, 2003 and is thriving intellectually and financially. It is the leading center in the world for research, education, application and the dissemination of Positive Psychology. It is widely recognized in both the scholarly and public press. The PPC is financially self-sustaining and contributes substantial overhead to Penn. The mission of the PPC is to promote empirical research, education, training, applications, and the dissemination of Positive Psychology. Positive Psychology is the scientific study of the strengths that enable individuals and communities to thrive. This field is founded on the belief that people want to lead meaningful and fulfilling lives, to cultivate what is best within themselves, and to enhance their experiences of love, work, and play. PPC Report FY17- 1 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS New Books: • In Homo Prospectus , Drs. Seligman, Railton, Baumeister, and Sripada argue that it is anticipating and evaluating future possibilities for the guidance of thought and action that is the cornerstone of human success. Though sapiens defines human beings as “wise”, what humans do especially well is to prospect the future. We are homo prospectus. Following is a recent New York Times article on this work: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/opinion/sunday/why-the-future-is-always-on-your- mind.html?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&module=Trending&version=Full& region=Marginalia&pgtype=article&_r=0 • In Being Called: Scientific, Secular, and Sacred Perspectives , Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enteric Nervous System: a Second Brain
    The Enteric Nervous System: A Second Brain MICHAEL D. GERSHON Columbia University Once dismissed as a simple collection of relay ganglia, the enteric nervous system is now recognized as a complex, integrative brain in its own right. Although we still are unable to relate complex behaviors such as gut motility and secretion to the activity of individual neurons, work in that area is proceeding briskly--and will lead to rapid advances in the management of functional bowel disease. Dr. Gershon is Professor and Chair, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York. In addition to numerous scientific publications, he is the author of The Second Brain (Harper Collins, New York, 1998). Structurally and neurochemically, the enteric nervous system (ENS) is a brain unto itself. Within those yards of tubing lies a complex web of microcircuitry driven by more neurotransmitters and neuromodulators than can be found anywhere else in the peripheral nervous system. These allow the ENS to perform many of its tasks in the absence of central nervous system (CNS) control--a unique endowment that has permitted enteric neurobiologists to investigate nerve cell ontogeny and chemical mediation of reflex behavior in a laboratory setting. Recognition of the importance of this work as a basis for developing effective therapies for functional bowel disease, coupled with the recent, unexpected discovery of major enteric defects following the knockout of murine genes not previously known to affect the gut, has produced a groundswell of interest that has attracted some of the best investigators to the field. Add to this that the ENS provides the closest thing we have to a window on the brain, and one begins to understand why the bowel--the second brain--is finally receiving the attention it deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact: Amy Walker at 215-746-5084 Or [email protected]
    Contact: Amy Walker at 215-746-5084 or [email protected] NEW LEADERS LAUNCH POSITIVE NEUROSCIENCE Award-winning researchers to explore human flourishing from neural networks to social networks Aug. 2, 2010 PHILADELPHIA -- The Positive Psychology Center of the University of Pennsylvania and the John Templeton Foundation (www.templeton.org) have announced the recipients of the Templeton Positive Neuroscience Awards. The project will grant $2.9 million in award funding to 15 new research projects at the intersection of Neuroscience and Positive Psychology. The winning projects will help us understand how the brain enables human flourishing. They explore a range of topics, from the biological bases of altruism to the effects of positive interventions on the brain. The Positive Neuroscience Project (www.posneuroscience.org) was established in 2008 by Professor Martin E.P. Seligman, Director of the Penn Positive Psychology Center, with a $5.8 million grant from the John Templeton Foundation. In 2009, the project announced the Templeton Positive Neuroscience Awards competition to bring the tools of neuroscience to bear on advances in Positive Psychology. Seligman founded the quickly-growing field of Positive Psychology in 1998 based on the simple yet radical notion that what is good in life is as worthy of scientific study as what is disabling in life. “Research has shown that positive emotions and interventions can bolster health, achievement, and resilience, and can buffer against depression and anxiety,” said Seligman. “And while considerable research in neuroscience has focused on disease, dysfunction, and the harmful effects of stress and trauma, very little is known about the neural mechanisms of human flourishing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Remarkable, Yet Not Extraordinary, Human Brain As a Scaled-Up Primate Brain and Its Associated Cost
    The remarkable, yet not extraordinary, human brain as a scaled-up primate brain and its associated cost Suzana Herculano-Houzel1 Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and Instituto Nacional de Neurociência Translacional, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia, 04023-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil Edited by Francisco J. Ayala, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved April 12, 2012 (received for review February 29, 2012) Neuroscientists have become used to a number of “facts” about the The incongruity between our extraordinary cognitive abilities human brain: It has 100 billion neurons and 10- to 50-fold more glial and our not-that-extraordinary brain size has been the major cells; it is the largest-than-expected for its body among primates driving factor behind the idea that the human brain is an outlier, and mammals in general, and therefore the most cognitively able; an exception to the rules that have applied to the evolution of all it consumes an outstanding 20% of the total body energy budget other animals and brains. A largely accepted alternative expla- despite representing only 2% of body mass because of an increased nation for our cognitive superiority over other mammals has been metabolic need of its neurons; and it is endowed with an overde- our extraordinary brain size compared with our body size, that is, veloped cerebral cortex, the largest compared with brain size. our large encephalization quotient (8). Compared
    [Show full text]
  • A Model for Cognitively-Based Compassion Training: Theoretical…
    Social Theory & Health https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00124-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE A model for cognitively‑based compassion training: theoretical underpinnings and proposed mechanisms Marcia Ash1 · Timothy Harrison2 · Melissa Pinto3 · Ralph DiClemente4 · Lobsang Tenzin Negi2 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Across cultures and belief systems, compassion is widely considered to be benefcial for the development of personal and social wellbeing. Research indicates that com- passion-training programs have broad health benefts, but how and why compassion- training programs are efective is still relatively unknown. This paper describes the theoretical underpinnings of a specifc compassion-training program, CBCT® (Cog- nitively-Based Compassion Training), and proposes an integrative model that draws on existing health behavior constructs to identify CBCT’s core components and hypothesizes their directionality and interaction. The model includes two primary categories of skill development: (1) intrapersonal skills leading to greater resiliency, and (2) interpersonal skills leading to greater compassion. It is hypothesized that these two pathways are mutually reinforcing and both contribute to greater wellbe- ing. This model provides a foundation for theory-driven research on the underlying mechanisms in CBCT training. An understanding of CBCT’s mechanisms is a criti- cal step towards optimizing and personalizing the intervention to meet the needs of specifc populations. Keywords Compassion · Wellbeing · Resilience · Contemplative practice · Mechanisms of behavior change Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual model that explains how the components of Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT ®) lead to greater resilience, compassion, and wellbeing. There is a compelling body of evidence to support the role of compassion in improving health and wellbeing (Hofmann et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua D. Greene
    Joshua D. Greene Dept. of Psychology, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 William James Hall 1470 [email protected] (617) 495-3898 http://www.joshua-greene.net/ updated 1/4/18 Appointments Professor, Department of Psychology, Harvard University. 2014- John and Ruth Hazel Associate Professor of the Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Harvard University. 2011-2014 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Harvard University. 2006-2011 Education and training Postdoctoral fellow, Princeton University (2002-2006). Neuroscience of Cognitive Control Laboratory (Jonathan Cohen, PI) Ph.D. in Philosophy, Princeton University, June 2002. Dissertation on the foundations of ethics advised by David Lewis and Gilbert Harman A.B. in Philosophy, Harvard University, March 1997 Research interests Psychology and cognitive neuroscience of morality: Intuition and reasoning in moral judgment Domain-general influences on moral judgment Conflict and cooperation across divided groups Improving moral decision-making Machine ethics/safety Infrastructure of complex thought Neural mechanisms of compositional semantics in language, imagination, reasoning, etc. Artificial neural architectures for compositional cognition Moral philosophy Ethical implications of scientific self-knowledge Social challenges/opportunities of advancing artificial intelligence Joshua D. Greene Advising and teaching * indicates current trainee Graduate students (primary advisor): Regan Bernhard, Donal Cahill, Alek Chakroff, Steven Frankland, Joseph Paxton, *Dillon Plunkett,
    [Show full text]
  • Ippathirdworldcongressprogram.Pdf
    Final Program Third World Congress on Positive Psychology June 27-30, 2013 Westin Bonaventure Los Angeles Executive Committee Robert Vallerand, President Carmelo Vazquez, President Elect Dianne Vella-Brodrick, Secretary Kim Cameron, Treasurer Antonella Delle Fave, Immediate Past President Ray Fowler, Senior Advisor Martin Seligman, Senior Advisor James Pawelski, Executive Director Board of Directors Tal Ben-Shahar Helena Marujo Table of Contents Page Ilona Boniwell Mario Mikulincer David Cooperrider Luis Miguel Neto Committees................................................3 Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi Jeanne Nakamura Ed Diener Nansook Park Barbara Fredrickson Kaiping Peng Welcome Messages ....................................4 Maria Elena Garassini Willibald Ruch Anthony Grant Kamlesh Singh Nick Haslam Alena Slezackova General Information ..................................6 John Helliwell Alejandro Castro Solano Felicia Huppert Philip Streit Ren Jun Sombat Tapanya Hotel Floor Plan ........................................7 Rose Inza-Kim Margarita Tarragona Hans Henrik Knoop George Vaillant Marlena Kossakowska Jason Van Allen, SIPPA President Schedule at a Glance..................................8 Charles Martin-Krumm Joar Vitterso Michael Lamb Marie Wissing Program Schedule....................................20 Richard Layard Philip Zimbardo Shane Lopez Poster Session 1 .......................................36 IPPA Directorate Reb Rebele, MAPP, Director of Programing and Communications Gene Terry, CAE, Administrative Director Poster Session
    [Show full text]