Finalist Symposium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Finalist Symposium TEMPLETON SCIENCE OF PROSPECTION AWARDS The Prospective Psychology Project University of Pennsylvania Positive Psychology Center FINALIST SYMPOSIUM: AUGUST 4–5, 201 4 37 01 Market Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA 191 04 www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu Special Thanks to The John Templeton Foundation TEMPLETON SCIENCE OF PROSPECTION AWARDS Table of Contents Sponsors ...............................................1 Science of Prospection Steering Committee ..........2 Symposium Agenda Overview ........................6 Day One Presentation Schedule ......................8 Day Two Presentation Schedule .....................10 Science of Prospection Proposal Abstracts ...........12 SPONSORS The Prospective Psychology Project Some of the goals of Positive Psychology are to build a science that supports: Supported by a grant from the John Templeton • Families and schools that allow children to flourish Foundation, the University of Pennsylvania Positive • Workplaces that foster satisfaction and high Psychology Center has established the Prospective productivity Psychology Project to advance the scientific understanding of prospection, or the mental • Communities that encourage civic engagement representation of possible futures. To foster this • Therapists who identify and nurture their patients’ new field of research, the Prospective Psychology strengths Project announced the Templeton Science of • The teaching of Positive Psychology Prospection Awards competition in 2013. The awards will encourage research aimed at understanding • Dissemination of Positive Psychology interventions prospection, particularly how prospection is in organizations and communities measured, mechanisms of prospection, and how prospection can be improved and applied in a broad To learn more about the Positive Psychology Center, array of disciplines. To learn more about Prospective please visit www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu. Psychology, please visit www.prospectivepsych.org. The John Templeton Foundation The University of Pennsylvania Positive Psychology Center The John Templeton Foundation serves as a philan - thropic catalyst for discoveries relating to the Big The Positive Psychology Center promotes research, Questions of human purpose and ultimate reality. training, education, and the dissemination of Positive We support research on subjects ranging from com - Psychology. This field is founded on the belief that plexity, evolution, and infinity to creativity, forgive - people want to lead meaningful and fulfilling lives, ness, love, and free will. We encourage civil, to cultivate what is best within themselves, and informed dialogue among scientists, philosophers, to enhance their experiences of love, work, and play. and theologians and between such experts and the public at large, for the purposes of definitional clar - Positive Psychology has three central concerns: ity and new insights. positive emotions, positive individual traits, and positive institutions. Understanding positive Our vision is derived from the late Sir John Temple - emotions entails the study of contentment with the ton’s optimism about the possibility of acquiring past, happiness in the present, and hope for the “new spiritual information” and from his commit - future. Understanding positive individual traits ment to rigorous scientific research and related consists of the study of the strengths and virtues, scholarship. The Foundation’s motto, “How little we such as the capacity for love and work, courage, know, how eager to learn,” exemplifies our support compassion, resilience, creativity, curiosity, integrity, for open-minded inquiry and our hope for advanc - self-knowledge, moderation, self-control, and wisdom. ing human progress through breakthrough discover - Understanding positive institutions entails the study ies. of the strengths that foster better communities, such as justice, responsibility, civility, parenting, To learn more about the John Templeton nurturance, work ethic, leadership, teamwork, Foundation, please visit www.templeton.org purpose, and tolerance. 1 SCIENCE OF PROSPECTION STEERING COMMITTEE Martin E.P. Seligman, Principal Investigator Roy F. Baumeister Dr. Seligman graduated Summa Roy F. Baumeister is currently Cum Laude from Princeton the Eppes Eminent Scholar and in 1964 and received his Ph.D. Professor of Psychology at in psychology from the University Florida State Univer sity. He of Pennsylvania in 1967. He is received his Ph.D. in social currently the Zellerbach Family psychology from Princeton in Professor of Psychology and 1978 and did a postdoctoral Director of the Positive Psychology fellowship in sociology at the Center at the University of University of California at Pennsylvania. He was elected President of the Ameri - Berkeley. He spent over two decades at Case Western can Psychological Association in 1996 by the largest Reserve University. He has also worked at the vote in history. Dr. Seligman works on learned University of Texas, the University of Virginia, the helplessness, depression, optimism, positive psychology Max-Planck-Institute, the VU Free University of and comprehensive soldier fitness. His research has Amsterdam, the University of California at Santa been supported by the National Institutes of Health, Barbara, and Stanford’s Center for Advanced Study the National Science Foundation, the John Templeton in the Behavioral Sciences. Baumeister’s research Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, the Guggen - spans multiple topics, including self and identity, heim Foundation, the Annenberg Foundation, and self-regulation, interpersonal rejection and the need the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. to belong, sexuality and gender, aggression, self- esteem, meaning, and self-presentation. He has Dr. Seligman is a best-selling author, having written received research grants from the National Institutes 25 books which have been translated into more of Health and from the Templeton Foundation. He than 35 languages. His best-sellers include Learned has over 500 publications, and his 31 books include Optimism (Knopf, 1991), The Optimistic Child Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty , The Cultural (Houghton Mifflin, 1995), and Authentic Happiness Animal , Meanings of Life , and the New York Times (Free Press, 2002). His latest is Flourish (Free Press, bestseller Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest 2011). He is the recipient of three Distinguished Human Strength . The Institute for Scientific Infor - Scientific Contribution awards from the American mation lists him among the handful of most cited Psychological Association, the Laurel Award of the (most influential) psychologists in the world. He has American Association for Applied Psychology received lifetime achievement awards from the and Prevention, and the Lifetime Achievement Society for Personality and Social Psychology, from Award of the Society for Research in Psychopathology. the International Society for Self and Identity, and Dr. Seligman received both American Psychological most recently the Association for Psychological Society’s Williams James Fellow Award (for contribu - Science’s highest honor, the William James Award. tion to basic science) and the James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award (for the application of psychological knowledge). He received the inaugural Wiley Psychology Lifetime Award of the British Academy for lifetime contributions to Psychology in 2009. He holds four honorary doctorates, including the University of Uppsala, Sweden, and Complutense University, Spain. 2 Randy Buckner Laurie Santos Randy Buckner is Professor of Laurie Santos is Associate Psychology and of Neuroscience Professor of Psychology at Yale at Harvard University and University and the director of affiliated with the Center for Yale University’s Comparative Brain Science. He is also Cognition Laboratory. Laurie Professor at the Harvard Medical received her B.A. in Psychology School and the Director for and Biology from Harvard Psychiatric Neuroimaging University in 1997 and her Research at the Massachusetts Ph.D. in Psychology from Har - General Hospital. He received his Ph.D. degree in vard in 2003. Her research explores the evolutionary neuroscience from Washington University, under the origins of human cognition by studying the cognitive direction of Steven Petersen and Marcus Raichle. capacities present in nonhuman primates. She has He trained with Bruce Rosen as a postdoctoral fellow investigated a number of topics in comparative and then Instructor of Radiology at Harvard cognition, including primates, understanding of Medical School, where he pioneered new functional objects and physics, how primates reason about others’ MRI methods to study human memory. Over the minds, the evolutionary origins of irrational decision- past decade his work has expanded to include studies making, and the evolution of prosocial behavior. of Alzheimer’s disease and neuropsychiatric illness Laurie’s scientific research has been featured in with a focus on developing biomarkers for disease The New York Times , The Los Angeles Times , The detection and progression. This work has led to a Economist , Forbes , The New Yorker , New Scientist , description of the brain’s default network and how it Smithsonian , and Discover . She has also won numer - is targeted early in the progression of Alzheimer’s ous awards, both for her scientific achievements and disease. Professor Buckner’s awards include the Wiley for her teaching and mentorship. She is the recipient Young Investigator Award from the Organization of of Harvard University’s
Recommended publications
  • Tor Wager Diana L
    Tor Wager Diana L. Taylor Distinguished Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College Email: [email protected] https://wagerlab.colorado.edu Last Updated: July, 2019 Executive summary ● Appointments: Faculty since 2004, starting as Assistant Professor at Columbia ​ University. Associate Professor in 2009, moved to University of Colorado, Boulder in 2010; Professor since 2014. 2019-Present: Diana L. Taylor Distinguished Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Dartmouth College. ● Publications: 240 publications with >50,000 total citations (Google Scholar), 11 papers ​ cited over 1000 times. H-index = 79. Journals include Science, Nature, New England Journal of Medicine, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron, Nature Methods, PNAS, Psychological Science, PLoS Biology, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Nature Reviews Neurology, Nature Medicine, Journal of Neuroscience. ● Funding: Currently principal investigator on 3 NIH R01s, and co-investigator on other ​ collaborative grants. Past funding sources include NIH, NSF, Army Research Institute, Templeton Foundation, DoD. P.I. on 4 R01s, 1 R21, 1 RC1, 1 NSF. ● Awards: Awards include NSF Graduate Fellowship, MacLean Award from American ​ Psychosomatic Society, Colorado Faculty Research Award, “Rising Star” from American Psychological Society, Cognitive Neuroscience Society Young Investigator Award, Web of Science “Highly Cited Researcher”, Fellow of American Psychological Society. Two patents on research products. ● Outreach: >300 invited talks at universities/international conferences since 2005. ​ Invited talks in Psychology, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Psychiatry, Neurology, Anesthesiology, Radiology, Medical Anthropology, Marketing, and others. Media outreach: Featured in New York Times, The Economist, NPR (Science Friday and Radiolab), CBS Evening News, PBS special on healing, BBC, BBC Horizons, Fox News, 60 Minutes, others.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan for Vanderbilt's Mental Health and Wellbeing
    STRATEGIC PLAN FOR Vanderbilt’s Mental Health and Wellbeing by the Chancellor’s Strategic Planning Committee DECEMBER 2017 STRATEGIC PLAN FOR VANDERBILT’S MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 Charge, Process, Timeline .................................................................................................. 5 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 8 1. For All Vanderbilt Community Members ...........................................................................8 2.For Students .....................................................................................................................11 3.For Faculty and Staff ........................................................................................................13 4.To Create a Culture that Supports Mental Wellbeing ......................................................15 5.To Position Vanderbilt as a Leader in Mental Health Research and Discovery ................18 Closing ............................................................................................................................. 19 Appendices ...................................................................................................................... 20 Appendix A—Subcommittee Report: Assessment of Campus Resources .........................20 Appendix B—Subcommittee Report:
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Psychology Center Annual Report 2017
    Positive Psychology Center Annual Report May 23, 2017 Martin Seligman, Director Peter Schulman, Executive Director Contents: Significant Developments New Books New Research New Resilience Training Contracts Outreach Programs Organization and Operation PPC Personnel PPC Advisory Board PPC Advisors Activities Research Summaries Education: Graduate and Undergraduate Resilience Training Programs Research Publications 2015-17 This is a report on the activities of the Positive Psychology Center (PPC). The PPC was officially created November 7, 2003 and is thriving intellectually and financially. It is the leading center in the world for research, education, application and the dissemination of Positive Psychology. It is widely recognized in both the scholarly and public press. The PPC is financially self-sustaining and contributes substantial overhead to Penn. The mission of the PPC is to promote empirical research, education, training, applications, and the dissemination of Positive Psychology. Positive Psychology is the scientific study of the strengths that enable individuals and communities to thrive. This field is founded on the belief that people want to lead meaningful and fulfilling lives, to cultivate what is best within themselves, and to enhance their experiences of love, work, and play. PPC Report FY17- 1 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS New Books: • In Homo Prospectus , Drs. Seligman, Railton, Baumeister, and Sripada argue that it is anticipating and evaluating future possibilities for the guidance of thought and action that is the cornerstone of human success. Though sapiens defines human beings as “wise”, what humans do especially well is to prospect the future. We are homo prospectus. Following is a recent New York Times article on this work: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/opinion/sunday/why-the-future-is-always-on-your- mind.html?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&module=Trending&version=Full& region=Marginalia&pgtype=article&_r=0 • In Being Called: Scientific, Secular, and Sacred Perspectives , Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact: Amy Walker at 215-746-5084 Or [email protected]
    Contact: Amy Walker at 215-746-5084 or [email protected] NEW LEADERS LAUNCH POSITIVE NEUROSCIENCE Award-winning researchers to explore human flourishing from neural networks to social networks Aug. 2, 2010 PHILADELPHIA -- The Positive Psychology Center of the University of Pennsylvania and the John Templeton Foundation (www.templeton.org) have announced the recipients of the Templeton Positive Neuroscience Awards. The project will grant $2.9 million in award funding to 15 new research projects at the intersection of Neuroscience and Positive Psychology. The winning projects will help us understand how the brain enables human flourishing. They explore a range of topics, from the biological bases of altruism to the effects of positive interventions on the brain. The Positive Neuroscience Project (www.posneuroscience.org) was established in 2008 by Professor Martin E.P. Seligman, Director of the Penn Positive Psychology Center, with a $5.8 million grant from the John Templeton Foundation. In 2009, the project announced the Templeton Positive Neuroscience Awards competition to bring the tools of neuroscience to bear on advances in Positive Psychology. Seligman founded the quickly-growing field of Positive Psychology in 1998 based on the simple yet radical notion that what is good in life is as worthy of scientific study as what is disabling in life. “Research has shown that positive emotions and interventions can bolster health, achievement, and resilience, and can buffer against depression and anxiety,” said Seligman. “And while considerable research in neuroscience has focused on disease, dysfunction, and the harmful effects of stress and trauma, very little is known about the neural mechanisms of human flourishing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model for Cognitively-Based Compassion Training: Theoretical…
    Social Theory & Health https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00124-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE A model for cognitively‑based compassion training: theoretical underpinnings and proposed mechanisms Marcia Ash1 · Timothy Harrison2 · Melissa Pinto3 · Ralph DiClemente4 · Lobsang Tenzin Negi2 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Across cultures and belief systems, compassion is widely considered to be benefcial for the development of personal and social wellbeing. Research indicates that com- passion-training programs have broad health benefts, but how and why compassion- training programs are efective is still relatively unknown. This paper describes the theoretical underpinnings of a specifc compassion-training program, CBCT® (Cog- nitively-Based Compassion Training), and proposes an integrative model that draws on existing health behavior constructs to identify CBCT’s core components and hypothesizes their directionality and interaction. The model includes two primary categories of skill development: (1) intrapersonal skills leading to greater resiliency, and (2) interpersonal skills leading to greater compassion. It is hypothesized that these two pathways are mutually reinforcing and both contribute to greater wellbe- ing. This model provides a foundation for theory-driven research on the underlying mechanisms in CBCT training. An understanding of CBCT’s mechanisms is a criti- cal step towards optimizing and personalizing the intervention to meet the needs of specifc populations. Keywords Compassion · Wellbeing · Resilience · Contemplative practice · Mechanisms of behavior change Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual model that explains how the components of Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT ®) lead to greater resilience, compassion, and wellbeing. There is a compelling body of evidence to support the role of compassion in improving health and wellbeing (Hofmann et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua D. Greene
    Joshua D. Greene Dept. of Psychology, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 William James Hall 1470 [email protected] (617) 495-3898 http://www.joshua-greene.net/ updated 1/4/18 Appointments Professor, Department of Psychology, Harvard University. 2014- John and Ruth Hazel Associate Professor of the Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Harvard University. 2011-2014 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Harvard University. 2006-2011 Education and training Postdoctoral fellow, Princeton University (2002-2006). Neuroscience of Cognitive Control Laboratory (Jonathan Cohen, PI) Ph.D. in Philosophy, Princeton University, June 2002. Dissertation on the foundations of ethics advised by David Lewis and Gilbert Harman A.B. in Philosophy, Harvard University, March 1997 Research interests Psychology and cognitive neuroscience of morality: Intuition and reasoning in moral judgment Domain-general influences on moral judgment Conflict and cooperation across divided groups Improving moral decision-making Machine ethics/safety Infrastructure of complex thought Neural mechanisms of compositional semantics in language, imagination, reasoning, etc. Artificial neural architectures for compositional cognition Moral philosophy Ethical implications of scientific self-knowledge Social challenges/opportunities of advancing artificial intelligence Joshua D. Greene Advising and teaching * indicates current trainee Graduate students (primary advisor): Regan Bernhard, Donal Cahill, Alek Chakroff, Steven Frankland, Joseph Paxton, *Dillon Plunkett,
    [Show full text]
  • Ippathirdworldcongressprogram.Pdf
    Final Program Third World Congress on Positive Psychology June 27-30, 2013 Westin Bonaventure Los Angeles Executive Committee Robert Vallerand, President Carmelo Vazquez, President Elect Dianne Vella-Brodrick, Secretary Kim Cameron, Treasurer Antonella Delle Fave, Immediate Past President Ray Fowler, Senior Advisor Martin Seligman, Senior Advisor James Pawelski, Executive Director Board of Directors Tal Ben-Shahar Helena Marujo Table of Contents Page Ilona Boniwell Mario Mikulincer David Cooperrider Luis Miguel Neto Committees................................................3 Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi Jeanne Nakamura Ed Diener Nansook Park Barbara Fredrickson Kaiping Peng Welcome Messages ....................................4 Maria Elena Garassini Willibald Ruch Anthony Grant Kamlesh Singh Nick Haslam Alena Slezackova General Information ..................................6 John Helliwell Alejandro Castro Solano Felicia Huppert Philip Streit Ren Jun Sombat Tapanya Hotel Floor Plan ........................................7 Rose Inza-Kim Margarita Tarragona Hans Henrik Knoop George Vaillant Marlena Kossakowska Jason Van Allen, SIPPA President Schedule at a Glance..................................8 Charles Martin-Krumm Joar Vitterso Michael Lamb Marie Wissing Program Schedule....................................20 Richard Layard Philip Zimbardo Shane Lopez Poster Session 1 .......................................36 IPPA Directorate Reb Rebele, MAPP, Director of Programing and Communications Gene Terry, CAE, Administrative Director Poster Session
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Internal Review Committee
    Center for Neuroscience & Society University of Pennsylvania REPORT TO THE INTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I. Mission …………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….. p. 2 II. History …………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….. p. 2 III. People ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 2 Faculty Staff Fellows Visiting Scholars Advisory Board IV. Funding …………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… p. 4 V. Space and Facilities ………………………………………………………………………………………… p. 4 VI. Overview .……………………………………………………………………………………………………… p. 5 VII. Research on Neuroscience and Society…………………………………………………………. P. 5 VIII. Outreach (Including K-12 Education) …………………………………………………………… p. 7 Online Public Talks Academic Outreach Within Penn Outreach Beyond Penn Conferences K-12 Education IX. Higher Education ………………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 11 Neuroscience Boot Camp Continuing Medical Education Neuroethics Learning Collaborative Penn Fellowships in Neuroscience and Society New Courses Preceptorials Graduate Certificate in Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (SCAN) X. Conclusions, Challenges for the Future …………………………………………………………… p. 15 Appendices 1-11 Submitted April 9, 2016, by Martha J. Farah, Director of the Center for Neuroscience & Society 1 I. Mission Neuroscience is giving us increasingly powerful methods for understanding, predicting and manipulating the human mind. Every sphere of life in which psychology plays a central role – from education and family life to law and politics – will be touched by these advances, and some will be profoundly transformed.
    [Show full text]
  • Science of Adolescent Learning: How Identity and Empowerment Influence Student Learning August 2019
    Science of Adolescent Learning: How Identity and Empowerment Influence Student Learning August 2019 SCIENCE OF ADOLESCENT LEARNING Acknowledgments This report was written by Hans Hermann, policy and research associate at the Alliance for Excellent Education (All4Ed). Robyn Harper, policy and research associate at All4Ed, contributed to the report. Winsome Waite, PhD, vice president of practice at All4Ed, leads All4Ed’s Science of Adolescent Learning initiative and also contributed to this report. Kristen Loschert, editorial director at All4Ed, supported the development of this report and series. Cover photo by Lorie Shaull via Wikimedia Commons. Photo cropped to fit cover dimensions. All4Ed thanks the following individuals for their guidance and input during the development of this report: Adriana Galván, PhD, University of California–Los Angeles; Ben Kirshner, PhD, University of Colorado–Boulder; and Laurence Steinberg, PhD, Temple University. All4Ed also acknowledges David Osher, PhD, vice president and institute fellow at the American Institutes for Research, for his support as a lead advisor in the development of this report series. The Alliance for Excellent Education (All4Ed) is a Washington, DC–based national policy, practice, and advocacy organization dedicated to ensuring that all students, particularly those underperforming and those historically underserved, graduate from high school ready for success in college, work, and citizenship. all4ed.org © Alliance for Excellent Education, 2019. @All4Ed facebook.com/All4ed Science of Adolescent Learning: How Identity and Empowerment Influence Student Learning | all4ed.org Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................1 About All4Ed’s SAL Consensus Statement Report Series . .2 All4Ed’s SAL Research Consensus Statements ..............................3 How Identity and Empowerment Influence Student Learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Mind-Brain Development: Towards a Comprehensive Theory
    Journal of Intelligence Review Mapping Mind-Brain Development: Towards a Comprehensive Theory George Spanoudis 1,* and Andreas Demetriou 2,3 1 Psychology Department, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus 2 Department of Psychology, University of Nicosia, 1700 Nicosia, Cyprus; [email protected] 3 Cyprus Academy of Science, Letters, and Arts, 1700 Nicosia, Cyprus * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +357-22892969 Received: 20 January 2020; Accepted: 20 April 2020; Published: 26 April 2020 Abstract: The relations between the developing mind and developing brain are explored. We outline a theory of intellectual development postulating that the mind comprises four systems of processes (domain-specific, attention and working memory, reasoning, and cognizance) developing in four cycles (episodic, realistic, rule-based, and principle-based representations, emerging at birth, 2, 6, and 11 years, respectively), with two phases in each. Changes in reasoning relate to processing efficiency in the first phase and working memory in the second phase. Awareness of mental processes is recycled with the changes in each cycle and drives their integration into the representational unit of the next cycle. Brain research shows that each type of processes is served by specialized brain networks. Domain-specific processes are rooted in sensory cortices; working memory processes are mainly rooted in hippocampal, parietal, and prefrontal cortices; abstraction and alignment processes are rooted in parietal, frontal, and prefrontal and medial cortices. Information entering these networks is available to awareness processes. Brain networks change along the four cycles, in precision, connectivity, and brain rhythms. Principles of mind-brain interaction are discussed. Keywords: brain; mind; development; intelligence; mental and brain changes; brain networks 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Neuroscience
    A white paper prepared for the John Templeton Foundation by the Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley February 2019 Positive Neuroscience Written by Summer Allen, Ph.D. ggsc.berkeley.edu greatergood.berkeley.edu Positive Neuroscience EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Showing care and affection to our loved ones, acting compassionately toward others who are suffering, being moved by an emotional song, and being resilient in the face of stressful situations—these feelings and behaviors are all crucial parts of being human and living a good life. But where do they come from? How do our brains help foster our capacity to flourish in the face of adversity, show kindness to those in despair, and enjoy life to the fullest? An emerging field of study—positive neuroscience—aims to answer these questions. Positive neuroscience focuses on the nervous system mechanisms that underlie human flourishing and well-being. This emerging field of study was significantly bolstered by the John Templeton Founda- tion’s $5.8 million Positive Neuroscience Project, an initiative led by Martin E.P. Seligman. The project included the Templeton Positive Neuroscience Awards competition, which awarded funding to 15 groups conducting research at the intersection of neuroscience and positive psychology. This white paper focuses on the research that has emanated from these awards. In particular, it discusses the neuroscience of social attachment and relationships (“the social brain”), compassion and generosity (“the compassionate brain”), musical talent and musical appreciation (“the musical brain”), and emotional regulation and resiliency (“the resilient brain”). The Social Brain abilities to form attachments to other people? Humans are social animals, and with good reason: Addressing this question typically involves Relationships are key to our happiness and looking at our earliest attachments in life: health—and to our survival.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Brain Connectivity in Musical Experience
    12 The Role of Brain Connectivity in Musical Experience PSYCHE LOUI ■ Human beings of all ages and all cultures have been creating, enjoying, and celebrating music for centuries, yet how the experiences of music are instanti- ated in the human brain is only beginning to be understood. To gain a full understanding of the neuroscience of positive experiences, one of the goals of positive neuroscience must entail examining how the brain subserves music appreciation. Te central thesis of this chapter is that structural and functional networks in the human brain enable musical behaviors that are exceptional, resourceful, and rewarding. Here I will describe studies that characterize how the human brain implements varieties of human perceptual, cognitive, and emotional abilities that surround musically relevant behaviors. Two parallel lines of these studies investigate special populations— people with absolute pitch and synesthesia— that possess exceptional abilities in perceptual catego- rization and association, respectively. Another line of studies examines how the general population can learn the structure that underlies musical systems from mere exposure, and identifes neural substrates of this learning process. A third line of studies tackles neural structures that give rise to uniquely per- sonal, intense emotional responses to music. Finally, I propose a view that music furthers our understanding of the fundamental organizational struc- ture of the brain as an interlocking set of networked highways, and I close with speculations on what the present studies could mean for positive neuroscience and to psychology and neuroscience more generally. 192 R ESILIENCE AND CREATIVITY ABSOLUTE PITCH— A CASE OF HYPERCONNECTIVITY Absolute pitch (AP) is the enhanced ability to categorize musical pitches without a reference.
    [Show full text]