Whetstone Mountains Unit, Cochise & Pima Co., Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whetstone Mountains Unit, Cochise & Pima Co., Arizona I ll IMLAI Mineral Land Assessment I Open File Report/1994 I MINERAL APPRAISAL OF CORONADO I NATIONAL FOREST, PART 11 Whetstone Mountains Unit Cochise and Pima Counties, Arizona Whetstone Mountains Unit ARIZONA / I E5 I ,.~,~ i~,~,~.~:~J~~ ~ - ~-~. ..... I 1 BUREAU OF MINES UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I RE]~RT D(OUMEK11"ATiONPAGE i 1" R~J~,, ~°" 12. 4. ~ and Subtitle Relx~t ~'~rta Mineral appraisal of Coronado National Forest, part ii November 1993 I Whetstone Mountains Unit, Cochise & Pima Co., AZ I Mark L. Chat~n .,o U.S. Bureau of Mines, IFOC-Resource Evaluation Branch I P.O. Box 25086 IL COCTtmCtO~ Or Grunt(G) No. Denver, CO 80225-0086 (C3 (G) I 12. Saonso4r~n( Oqam~ Nm~e end Add:rm~ 13- TYPe o~ R4moTt & lqmod C~v~md Open file report I .14. I 15. Su~p4em~txTy Nottm Z~Ab,~(Un~O.~x~ This report addresses the 44,345-acre Whetstone Mountains Unit of the I Forest. The work included inventorying and mapping of mines and prospects. Rock-chip samples from mineral zones were assayed; assay data are tabulated. Meta~i'ic "mineral deposits are genetically and spatially related to two intrusions that cut or underlie I Paleozoic-age sedimentary rocks. One deposit is a 22 million short ton inferred resource of 0.31 percent copper in veinlets and disseminations of sulfide minerals;-past production has been very small. A Precambrian-agequartz-monzonite/alaskite intrusion hosts a I fluorite vein, several quartz-tungsten veins, and sparse, uraniferous fractures. No re- sources of those commodities are present. A massive quartz dike, probably syngenetic with the Precambrian intrusion of quartz-monzonite/alaskite, was mined for about 300,000 short tons of copper-smelter flux; at least 8 million short tons of indicated silica-flux resources remain, but development is unlikely because they lack any appreciable precious metals content, a requisite in current markets. Sedimentary strata.~ost 137,000 short tons of low-purity, indicated, subeconomic gypsum resources with limited application. They are unlikely to ever be developed, based on steep terrain and unfavorable geologic structure, which would increase mining costs and reduce recoverability. Z~ Oocumem AM~ ~ Oe~c~xo4-s minerals mineral economics copper gypsum fluorite sulfide deposits gold tungsten Lone Star fluorite mine silica flux mine inventory b, Idm~Ufl~ra/Ope~d[ndGd Terms c. COATI Fle4dlGr~= 18. Av~la~lK'y 8~.xtm,rue~. 1~ S~cy CINm (Th~ Rmoo~ 7-I. No. of ~ "~ SGam'~'y C1xmm ~1'~s ~ j MINERAL APPRAISAL OF CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST, PART 11 I WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS UNIT I COCHISE AND PIMA COUNTIES, ARIZONA I I by I MARK L. CHATMAN U.S. BUREAU OF MINES MLA 2-94 I 1994 I I Intermountain Field Operations Center Denver, CO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bruce Babbitt, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES Hermann Enzer, Acting Director I iiiiI PREFACE I A January 1987 Interagency Agreement among the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM), U.S. Geological Survey, and the U.S. Dep. of Agriculture, Forest Service I describes the purpose, authority, and program operations for forest-wide studies. The program is intended to assist the Forest Service in incorporating mineral resource data into forest plans as specified by the National Forest Management Act (1976) and Title I 36, Chapter 2, Part 219, Code of Federal Regulations, and to augment the USBM's mineral resource data base so that it can analyze and make available minerals I information as required by the National Materials and Minerals Policy, Research and Development Act (1980). This report is based upon available information, extensive field investigations to verify or collect additional information, and contacts with mine I operators and prospectors active on lands administered by the Coronado National I Forest. I This open-file report summarizes the results of a USBM forest-wide study. The report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with the USBM editorial standards. This study was conducted by personnel from the Intermountain Field Operations Center, P.O. Box 25086, Building 20, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225-0086. I CONTENTS I SUMMARY ............................................... 1 I INTRODUCTION ............................................ 2 Geographic setting ..................................... 2 Geologic and mineral setting .............................. 2 I Mining and prospecting history ............................ 4 Previous investigations .................................. 5 I Present investigation ................................... 5 MINERAL DEPOSIT APPRAISAL ................................. 6 Tertiary-age copper deposits .............................. 6 I Granite Peak stock ................................ 7 Copper porphyry deposit possibilities .............. 7 Veinlet and disseminated deposits of copper ......... 8 I Economics ............................ 9 Skarn-hosted base-metal sulfides ................. 9 Resources ........................... 10 I Gold concentration levels in the stock ............. 10 Siliceous copper deposit ...................... 10 Other metallic mineral occurrences of probable Cretaceous/ Tertiary origin ....................................... 11 I Gold Cristle Mine ................................ 11 Montosa-Willow Canyon mercury anomaly .............. 12 Unnamed prospect (WH 105) ........................ 13 I Minerals hosted in Precambrian rock ........................ 13 Fluorite ....................................... 13 Mine subsidence ........................... 15 I Silica ........................................ 15 Tungsten ...................................... 16 Uranium ...................................... 20 I Resources ................................ 21 Miscellaneous prospects for metals ................... 23 Gypsum ........................................... 24 I Geology of the Whetstone Mountains Unit gypsum ......... 24 Gypsum resources inside the Whetstone Mountains Unit .... 25 Application and value ........................ 28 I Outcrop of the Epitaph Formation by Apache Peak .... 29 Competition from other deposits ................ 29 I CONCLUSIONS ........................................... 31 I REFERENCES ............................................. 33 I I CONTENTS--continued PaQe I ILLUSTRATIONS Fig. 1 Location map of the Whetstone Mountains Unit ............. 3 I Fig. 2 Mines and prospects of the Mine Canyon area, and outcrop area of the Granite Peak stock, with sample localities I WH77-96, WH98-102 ............................ 44 Fig. 3 Mine Canyon workings: Two Peaks Mine, unnamed adit WH86-87, and David Lee Mine, with sample localities I WH86-87, 90-93, 96, 98-99 ........................ 45 I Fig. 4 Mascot Mine, with sample localities WH77-81 ........... 46 Fig. 5 James, Evening Star, Chadwick, and Lone Star Mines and I prospects, with sample localities WH23-52 .............. 47 Fig. 6 Lone Star Mine, with sample locality WH52 ............. 48 Fig. 7 Ricketts Mine, and Precambrian(?) quartz dike, with sample I localities WH 18-22 ............................... 49 I Fig. 8 Ricketts Mine, with sample localities WIll 8-22 .......... pocket Fig. 9 Excavation at Chadwick Mine, and map of James Mine, with I sample localities WH29, 30 ......................... 50 Fig. 10 Eastern adit of Bluestone Mine and workings, cross sections of Windmill No. 1 Mine, with sample localities WH25-27, I WH9-10 ...................................... 51 I Fig. 11 Gold Cristle Mine, with sample localities WH53-55 ........ 52 Fig. 12 Gypsum occurrences, with sample localities WH56-69, WH71-76, and sample locality WH97 (a prospect related to I Granite Peak stock) .............................. 53 I Plate 1 Sample locality map of the Whetstone Mountains Unit ..... pocket I I .°. I III CONTENTS--continued I COMPOSITE EXPLANATIONS Explanation of symbols for report figures and plates, including: inset maps at various scales and 1:126,720- I scale plates .................................... 38 Explanation of symbols for report figures, including: I features of detailed mine maps, both surface and underground, at various scales (larger than 1:24,000) ...... 40 I TABLES I Table 1 Evaluation of quartz veins for tungsten content ........... 18 I Table 2 Evaluation of uranium mines and prospects .............. 22 Table 3 Evaluation of gypsum beds and associated rocks .......... 26 I APPENDIXES I A. Descriptions of reconnaissance rock-chip samples ......... A1 B. Assays of reconnaissance rock-chip samples by Bondar-Clegg and Co., Ltd, using the neutron activation I method ....................................... B1 C. Assays of reconnaissance rock-chip samples by I Chemex Labs, Inc., using the inductively coupled plasma method ....................................... C1 I D. I. Sampling methods; II. Sample preparation procedures (for assay); II1. PREVAL parameters and backup data for PREVAL I modeling, Whetstone Mountains Unit .................. D1 I I iv UNIT OF MEASURE ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT Acre(s) ac I Counts per second cps Degree o Inch(es) in. I Foot (feet) ft Mile(s) mi Ounce(s) oz (troy) I Part(s) per billion ppb Part(s) per million ppm Percent % I Pound(s) Ib (avoirdupois) Short ton(s) st (2,000 Ib) I Square mile(s) mi 2 I I II i'!i V m MINERAL APPRAISAL OF CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST, PART 11 ! WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS UNIT by Mark L. Chatman 1 ! SUMMARY U.S. Bureau of Mines personnel studied mineral resources of the Coronado National Forest to appraise the resources present and determine areas for possible future mineral exploration and development. This
Recommended publications
  • Section 9-Sierra Vista Subbasin of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Arizona
    Section 9.—Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of the Basin-Fill Aquifer in the Sierra Vista Subbasin of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Arizona By David W. Anning and James M. Leenhouts in Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of Selected Basin- Fill Aquifers in the Southwestern United States Edited by Susan A. Thiros, Laura M. Bexfield, David W. Anning, and Jena M. Huntington National Water-Quality Assessment Program Professional Paper 1781 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii Contents Basin Overview .........................................................................................................................................145 Water Development History .....................................................................................................................147 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................148 Conceptual Understanding of the Groundwater Flow System ...........................................................149 Water Budget ....................................................................................................................................149 Groundwater Movement .................................................................................................................152 Effects of Natural and Human Factors on Groundwater Quality ......................................................157 Summary......................................................................................................................................................160
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan March 2011 Edited By ELI CURIEL JR. ID Core Team Leader Approved By /C/ Annette H. Chavez March 4, 2011 Annette H. Chavez, Sierra Vista District Ranger Date Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1 STEP 1 – SETTING UP THE ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 3 STEP 2- DESCRIBING THE SITUATION ....................................................................................................... 5 TABLE 2.1 – EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 7 TABLE 2.2 - EXISTING ROAD CLASSIFICATIONS ............................................................................................ 13 STEP 3- IDENTIFYING ISSUES ..................................................................................................................... 13 STEP 4- ASSESSING BENEFITS, PROBLEMS AND RISKS OF THE EXISTING ROAD SYSTEM ... 21 LANDS .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 SOIL, WATER, AIR, AND FORESTRY ............................................................................................................... 31 Figure 4.1 Whetstone Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Granite Peak Stock Area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Geology of the Granite Peak stock area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors DeRuyter, Vernon Donald Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 05:09:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555132 GEOLOGY OF THE GRANITE PEAK STOCK AREA, WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA by Vernon Donald DeRuyter A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Re­ quests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major de­ partment or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the pro­ posed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Scorpiones: Vaejovidae)
    New Species of Vaejovis from the Whetstone Mountains, Southern Arizona (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae) Richard F. Ayrey & Michael E. Soleglad January 2015 — No. 194 Euscorpius Occasional Publications in Scorpiology EDITOR: Victor Fet, Marshall University, ‘[email protected]’ ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Michael E. Soleglad, ‘[email protected]’ Euscorpius is the first research publication completely devoted to scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Euscorpius takes advantage of the rapidly evolving medium of quick online publication, at the same time maintaining high research standards for the burgeoning field of scorpion science (scorpiology). Euscorpius is an expedient and viable medium for the publication of serious papers in scorpiology, including (but not limited to): systematics, evolution, ecology, biogeography, and general biology of scorpions. Review papers, descriptions of new taxa, faunistic surveys, lists of museum collections, and book reviews are welcome. Derivatio Nominis The name Euscorpius Thorell, 1876 refers to the most common genus of scorpions in the Mediterranean region and southern Europe (family Euscorpiidae). Euscorpius is located at: http://www.science.marshall.edu/fet/Euscorpius (Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2510, USA) ICZN COMPLIANCE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS: Electronic (“e-only”) publications are fully compliant with ICZN (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature) (i.e. for the purposes of new names and new nomenclatural acts) when properly archived and registered. All Euscorpius issues starting from No. 156 (2013) are archived in two electronic archives: Biotaxa, http://biotaxa.org/Euscorpius (ICZN-approved and ZooBank-enabled) Marshall Digital Scholar, http://mds.marshall.edu/euscorpius/. (This website also archives all Euscorpius issues previously published on CD-ROMs.) Between 2000 and 2013, ICZN did not accept online texts as "published work" (Article 9.8).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Middle Canyon, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Geology of the Middle Canyon, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Burnette, Charles Richard, 1929- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 19:55:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/553905 GEOLOGY OF THE MIDDLE CANYON, WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA &*■ . by Charles R. Burnette A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial FulfiUment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1957 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re­ quirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to bor­ rowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without spe­ cial permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: w, / f r ? JOHN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Change at Kartchner Caverns: Trying to Separate Natural and Anthropogenic Changes
    Environmental Change at Kartchner Caverns: Trying to Separate Natural and Anthropogenic Changes Rickard S. Toomey, III, and Ginger Nolan Kartchner Caverns State Park, Arizona State Parks, Benson, AZ Abstract—Cave temperature and moisture levels are important factors in the environmental health of Kartchner Caverns. Monitoring indicates the cave has warmed and moisture levels have fallen over the past 14 years. Timing and patterns of change within the cave suggest that changes are due to development as a show cave. However, changes in other caves, surface temperature and precipitation, and in shallow local aquifers suggest that cave changes relate to regional patterns. Changes at Kartchner Caverns represent a combination of anthropogenic and regional natural causes. Separating these different factors is an important on-going goal in protecting the cave. Kartchner Caverns State Park (KCSP) is a show cave in The primary long-term temperature and humidity data southeastern Arizona. The cave was discovered in 1974 and from the cave come from Environmental Monitoring Stations became a State Park in 1988 (Tufts and Tenen 1999). After (EMS) within the cave (figure 1). These are locations at pre-development studies to assess the condition of the cave, which air, water, and soil temperature, relative humidity, to establish baseline data, and to determine how best to de- and pan evaporation are measured manually on a periodic velop the cave, Arizona State Parks began development of basis, usually weekly or monthly. Temperatures are measured the cave for ecological education and tourism. The develop- with small, digital probe thermometers; relative humidity is ment included creating tunnel entrances to the cave, building measured using a digital probe thermometer equipped as a trails for tours, and installing a lighting system.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • (U3&") Correlation of Arizona Paleozoic Formations
    S70YANOU) (U3&") BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 47, PP- 459-540. 1 PL., 5 FIGS. APRIL 30. 1936 um. CORRELATION OF ARIZONA PALEOZOIC FORMATIONS BY A. A. STOYANOW CONTENTS Page Utawriedgmaito «0 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: J® (V»brian . North-Central area 462 Southeastern area in general 465 ** Bisbee-Tucson sub-area 466 Bolsa quartzite, Pima sandstone, and Cochise formation 466 , Abrigo formation 467 rV Copper Queen limestone 469 Y: Rincon limestone 471 5 Tucson-Globe sub-area 472 m Relation of the Apache group to the Cambrian 472 Troy quartzite 474 Santa Catalina formation i 476 Abrigo formation 476 Peppersauce Canyon sandstone 476 if Clifton-Morenci district 478 jf Correlation 479 'OrdoTician 481 Dos Cabezas Mountains 481 . Clifton-Morenci district 483 Jan.. 484 T General statement 484 Southeastern area 486 "§, General statement 486 Picacho de Calera formation 488 % Lower Ouray formation 489 •j| Remarks 492 orth-Central area 495 | General statement 495 Jerome formation 495 £ Island Mesa beds 500 t| Mt. Elden section and Temple Butte limestone 500 Grand Wash Cliffs and Music Mountains 504 "ppian. 505 P«»eral statement 505 ' &utheastern area 505 Escabrosa limestone 505 ^Paradise formation 508 Clifton-Morenci district 511 iv' (459) LATION OF ARIZONA PALEOZOIC CAMBRIAN 467 TCSON SUB-AREA is 165 feet in thickness, and the thickness of the entire Cochise e, and Cochise formation.—At ^^tion in the Whetstone Mountains is 311 feet. jcson sub-area, is the Bolsa >bbly grits, and cross-bedded, vitrei Abripo formation.—In the type locality at Bisbee, the Abrigo has been a total thickness varying from 430 terized by Ransome as "thin-bedded impure, in part shaly, in part t,cho de Calera Hills, 25 miles west 'k^^eous very cherty dolomitic limestone.
    [Show full text]
  • You Can Learn More About the Chiricahuas
    Douglas RANGER DISTRICT www.skyislandaction.org 2-1 State of the Coronado Forest DRAFT 11.05.08 DRAFT 11.05.08 State of the Coronado Forest 2-2 www.skyislandaction.org CHAPTER 2 Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area The Chiricahua Mountain Range, located in the Natural History southeastern corner of the Coronado National Forest, The Chiricahua Mountains are known for their is one of the largest Sky Islands in the U.S. portion of amazing variety of terrestrial plants, animals, and the Sky Island region. The range is approximately 40 invertebrates. They contain exceptional examples of miles long by 20 miles wide with elevations ranging ecosystems that are rare in southern Arizona. While from 4,400 to 9,759 feet at the summit of Chiricahua the range covers only 0.5% of the total land area in Peak. The Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area Arizona, it contains 30% of plant species found in (EMA) is the largest Management Area on the Forest Arizona, and almost 50% of all bird species that encompassing 291,492 acres of the Chiricahua and regularly occur in the United States.1 The Chiricahuas Pedragosa Mountains. form part of a chain of mountains spanning from Protected by remoteness, the Chiricahuas remain central Mexico into southern Arizona. Because of one of the less visited ranges on the Coronado their proximity to the Sierra Madre, they support a National Forest. Formerly surrounded only by great diversity of wildlife found nowhere else in the ranches, the effects of Arizona’s explosive 21st century United States such as the Mexican Chickadee, whose population growth are beginning to reach the flanks only known breeding locations in the country are in of the Chiricahuas.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Forest Service Southwestern Region Coronado National Forest July 2017 Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Day -- Ap Ril 6, 1959
    Southeastern Arizona-Trip V-2 GENERAL GEOLOGY OF SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA TRIP V, ROAD LOG (C ontinue d) Second Day -- Ap ril 6, 1959 Leaders: E. B. Mayo and W. D. Pye Driving Distance: 225. 7 miles Logged Distance: 216. 9 miles Starting Time : 7:00 A. M. General Statement: The route leads northward, along the axis of Sulphur Spring s Valley to Elfrida. From Elfrida the course is westward to the southe rn Dragoon Mountains and the old mining camps of Gleeson and Courtland. It will then continue northward along Sulphur Spring s Valley, finally turning eastward to ascend the out­ wash apron of the Chiricahua Mountains. The route will then head northward and northeastward over Apache Pas s, and on to Bowie and State Highway 86. From Bowie the route is southwestward to Willcox, then along the no rthern margin of Willcox Playa. It ascends southwestward past the northern edge of the Red Bird Hills, pas ses betwe en the Gunnison Hills and Steele Hill s, crosses the Little Dragoon Mountains via Texas Canyon, and de scends to Benson on the San Pedro River. Beyond Benson the highway asc ends we stward betw een the Whetstone Mountain s on the south and the Rincons on the north to Mountain View, and on to Tucson. The party will see: (1) the thrust blocks, intrusions and abandoned mining camps of the southern Dragoon Mountains; (2) some of the volcanic rocks of the northern Chiricahua Mountains ; (3) the Precam­ brian granite and the Cretaceous and Paleozoic sections in Apache Pass; (4) Willcox Playa, lowe st part of Sulphur Sp ring s Valley; (5) the Paleozoic section of the Gunnison Hills, and the young er Precambrian Apache and Paleozoic sequences of the Little Dragoon Mountains; (6) the porphyritic granite of Texas Canyon; and (7) the steeply-dipping Miocene (?) Pantano beds west of Benson.
    [Show full text]