Scorpiones: Vaejovidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scorpiones: Vaejovidae) New Species of Vaejovis from the Whetstone Mountains, Southern Arizona (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae) Richard F. Ayrey & Michael E. Soleglad January 2015 — No. 194 Euscorpius Occasional Publications in Scorpiology EDITOR: Victor Fet, Marshall University, ‘[email protected]’ ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Michael E. Soleglad, ‘[email protected]’ Euscorpius is the first research publication completely devoted to scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Euscorpius takes advantage of the rapidly evolving medium of quick online publication, at the same time maintaining high research standards for the burgeoning field of scorpion science (scorpiology). Euscorpius is an expedient and viable medium for the publication of serious papers in scorpiology, including (but not limited to): systematics, evolution, ecology, biogeography, and general biology of scorpions. Review papers, descriptions of new taxa, faunistic surveys, lists of museum collections, and book reviews are welcome. Derivatio Nominis The name Euscorpius Thorell, 1876 refers to the most common genus of scorpions in the Mediterranean region and southern Europe (family Euscorpiidae). Euscorpius is located at: http://www.science.marshall.edu/fet/Euscorpius (Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2510, USA) ICZN COMPLIANCE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS: Electronic (“e-only”) publications are fully compliant with ICZN (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature) (i.e. for the purposes of new names and new nomenclatural acts) when properly archived and registered. All Euscorpius issues starting from No. 156 (2013) are archived in two electronic archives: Biotaxa, http://biotaxa.org/Euscorpius (ICZN-approved and ZooBank-enabled) Marshall Digital Scholar, http://mds.marshall.edu/euscorpius/. (This website also archives all Euscorpius issues previously published on CD-ROMs.) Between 2000 and 2013, ICZN did not accept online texts as "published work" (Article 9.8). At this time, Euscorpius was produced in two identical versions: online (ISSN 1536-9307) and CD-ROM (ISSN 1536-9293) (laser disk) in archive-quality, read-only format. Both versions had the identical date of publication, as well as identical page and figure numbers. Only copies distributed on a CD-ROM from Euscorpius in 2001-2012 represent published work in compliance with the ICZN, i.e. for the purposes of new names and new nomenclatural acts. In September 2012, ICZN Article 8. What constitutes published work, has been amended and allowed for electronic publications, disallowing publication on optical discs. From January 2013, Euscorpius discontinued CD-ROM production; only online electronic version (ISSN 1536-9307) is published. For further details on the new ICZN amendment, see http://www.pensoft.net/journals/zookeys/article/3944/. Publication date: 28 January 2015 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B5D24928-5D29-40D8-8448-4953099A75EB Euscorpius — Occasional Publications in Scorpiology. 2015, No. 194 New species of Vaejovis from the Whetstone Mountains, southern Arizona (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae) Richard F. Ayrey 1 and Michael E. Soleglad 2 1 P. O. Box 2236, Flagstaff, Arizona 86003, USA; email: [email protected] 2 32255 Safflower St., Winchester, California 92596, USA; email: [email protected] http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B5D24928-5D29-40D8-8448-4953099A75EB Summary A new scorpion species, Vaejovis troupi sp. n., is described and placed in the “vorhiesi” group of the genus Vaejovis. Based on a recent molecular analysis of Bryson et al. (2013), this species is shown to be related to V. vorhiesi and V. grahami. Two of three diagnostic characters found in this new species are the presence of six inner denticles (ID) on the pedipalpal fixed and movable fingers, and a unique arrangement of trichobothria on the external surface of the pedipalp patella. This species was found in an isolated montane habitat in the Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona. Introduction diagnostic characters that differentiate the specimen from the Whetstone Mountains. In addition, in a recent Herbert Stahnke (1940) named the first species to be phylogeographic analysis of “vorhiesi” group scorpions placed in the “vorhiesi” group of Vaejovis, all from (Bryson et al., 2013), V. vorhiesi and V. grahami form a Arizona: V. vorhiesi, V. lapidicola, and V. jonesi. monophyletic group with the specimen from the Whet- Soleglad (1973: figs. 24–25) named the next species stone Mountains, and appears to have diverged from placed in this group, V. paysonensis, and was the first these two species as early as the Miocene. Based on this author to use the number of inner denticles (ID) of the combination of genetic and morphological distinctive- chelal movable finger as a diagnostic character. Since ness, we herein describe the specimen from the Whet- then, including the new species described in this paper, stones as a new species. fourteen additional species have been described and placed in the “vorhiesi” group. The number of ID on the Materials and Methods movable finger is still used today to partition the many species in this group into two subgroups, which in general complies with distinct geographic areas. In total, Terminology and conventions there are now eighteen “vorhiesi” group species span- ning Arizona, New Mexico, and Sonora, Mexico. Measurements are as described in Stahnke (1970), The Whetstone Mountains are one of the “sky trichobothrial patterns are as in Vachon (1974), pedipalp islands” found in southeastern Arizona, close to the finger dentition follows Soleglad & Sissom (2001), and Huachuca and Santa Rita mountain ranges, and contain sternum terminology as described in Soleglad & Fet ideal habitat for “vorhiesi” group scorpions. Indeed, a (2003). The holotype was sequenced for the phylo- single “vorhiesi” group scorpion was collected in the graphic analysis of “vorhiesi” group scorpions by Whetstone Mountains by Robert Troup in October of Bryson et al. (2013). 2009. However, after numerous attempts to collect additional specimens from this area, none have been found. Abbreviations In this study, we examined the specimen from the Whetstone Mountains and compared it to two species RFA, personal collection of Richard F. Ayrey, from nearby sky islands: V. vorhiesi, from the Huachuca Flagstaff, Arizona, USA; and USNM, United States Mountains and V. grahami, from the Santa Rita Moun- National Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, tains. Our analysis identified three morphology-based DC, USA. 2 Euscorpius — 2015, No. 194 Figure 1: Vaejovis troupi sp. n., female holotype. In natural habitat (top) and on a leaf (bottom). Ayrey & Soleglad: New Vaejovis from Whetstone Mountains, Arizona 3 Figures 2-6: Vaejovis troupi sp. n., female holotype. 2. Metasoma and telson, ventral and lateral views. 3. Carapace and close- up of lateral eyes. 4. Pedipalp chela, external view, patella and femur, dorsal views. 5. Right leg III basitarsus and tarsus, ventral view. 6. Chelal fixed and movable fingers, each exhibiting six inner denticles (ID). Material (USNM); 22 June 2009, leg. R. F. Ayrey, 1 ♀ (RFA); 4 September 2008, leg. R. F. Ayrey & M. M. DeBoer- Besides type material listed below under the new Ayrey, 1 ♂ (RFA); 3 October 2010, leg. R. F. Ayrey, 1 species description, the following additional specimens ♂ (RFA); Mount Hopkins, Santa Rita Mountains, 2 were examined: August 2010, leg. R. F. Ayrey, 1 ♀ 1 ♂ (RFA). Vaejovis vorhiesi Stahnke, 1940. USA: Arizona: Vaejovis grahami Ayrey et Soleglad, 2014. USA: Cochise Co.: Miller Canyon, Huachuca Mountains, 24 Arizona: Cochise Co.: Madera Canyon, Santa Rita May 2011, leg. R. F. Ayrey & M. M. DeBoer-Ayrey, 3 Mountains, 12 May 2013, leg. R.F. Ayrey, ♀ holotype ♀ from type locality (RFA). 4 Euscorpius — 2015, No. 194 V. troupi V. grahami V. grahami V. grahami V. vorhiesi V. vorhiesi V. vorhiesi V. vorhiesi female female female female female female female female holotype holotype paratype paratype lectotype Whetstone Santa Rita Mountains Huachuca Mountains Mountains Madera Canyon Mt. Hopkins Miller’s Canyon Total length 25.70 26.90 26.30 23.85 24.28 24.80 25.05 28.25 Carapace length 3.40 3.45 3.45 3.30 3.36 3.50 3.30 3.45 Mesosoma length 7.10 7.90 7.55 6.15 10.00 7.70 7.90 10.50 Metasoma length 11.90 12.15 11.95 11.20 10.92 10.70 10.75 11.10 Segment I length/width 1.65/1.80 1.75/2.05 1.60/2.10 1.45/1.95 1.53/1.91 1.45/1.85 1.40/1.80 1.50/1.85 Segment II length/width 1.90/1.75 1.85/1.95 1.85/1.95 1.75/1.85 1.67/1.81 1.65/1.75 1.60/1.70 1.70/1.75 Segment III length/width 2.00/1.70 1.95/1.85 1.95/1.90 1.85/1.80 1.79/1.76 1.80/1.70 1.80/1.65 1.85/1.70 Segment IV length/width 2.70/1.60 2.70/1.80 2.65/1.85 2.55/1.65 2.52/1.65 2.40/1.55 2.45/1.55 2.50/1.55 Segment V length/width 3.65/1.50 3.90/1.65 3.90/1.75 3.60/1.65 3.41/1.53 3.40/1.55 3.50/1.50 3.55/1.55 Telson length 3.30 3.40 3.35 3.20 3.03 2.90 3.10 3.20 Vesicle length 2.15 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.95 1.70 1.85 2.00 width/depth 1.10/0.90 1.20/0.95 1.20/0.90 1.10/0.85 1.06/0.89 1.00/0.85 1.05/0.90 1.10/0.95 Aculeus length 1.15 1.15 1.10 1.20 1.08 1.20 1.25 1.20 Pedipalp length 11.65 11.40 11.00 10.90 10.73 10.65 10.55 11.00 Femur length/width 3.05/0.90 2.90/0.85 2.80/0.95 2.70/0.80 2.82/0.92 2.75/0.90 2.65/0.90 2.80/0.90 Patella length/width 3.35/1.05 3.45/1.15 3.25/1.15 3.25/0.95 2.99/1.06 3.10/1.00 3.10/1.00 3.20/1.05 Chela length 5.25 5.05 4.95 4.95 4.92 4.80 4.80 5.00 Palm length 2.15 2.15 2.00 2.05 2.00 2.00 1.90 2.00 width/depth 1.10/1.25 1.15/1.30 1.20/1.30 1.15/1.10 1.18/1.18 1.00/1.10 1.00/1.10 1.10/1.15 Fixed finger length 2.75 2.90 2.65 2.60 2.54 2.45 2.50 2.50 Movable finger length 3.35 3.35 3.15 3.00 3.08 2.90 3.00 3.05 Pectines teeth 11-12 13-12 14-14 13-12 13-13 13-13 12-13 12-12 Table 1: Morphometrics (mm) of Vaejovis troupi sp.
Recommended publications
  • Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona
    2.SOB nH in ntoiOGIGM. JAN 3 1 1989 Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona By ED DE WITT, S.M. RICHARD, J.R. HASSEMER, and W.F. HANNA U.S. Geological Survey J.R. THOMPSON U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- WEST-CENTRAL ARIZONA AND PART OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publlcatlon Data Mineral resources of the Harquahala Mountains wilderness study area, La Paz and Maricopa counties, Arizona. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Arizona and part of San Bernardino County, California ; ch. C) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1701-C 1. Mines and mineral resources Arizona Harquahala Mountains Wilderness. 2. Harquahala Mountains (Ariz.) I. DeWitt, Ed. II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701. QE75.B9 no. 1701-C 557.3 s [553'.09791'72] 88-600012 [TN24.A6] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 9-Sierra Vista Subbasin of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Arizona
    Section 9.—Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of the Basin-Fill Aquifer in the Sierra Vista Subbasin of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Arizona By David W. Anning and James M. Leenhouts in Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of Selected Basin- Fill Aquifers in the Southwestern United States Edited by Susan A. Thiros, Laura M. Bexfield, David W. Anning, and Jena M. Huntington National Water-Quality Assessment Program Professional Paper 1781 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii Contents Basin Overview .........................................................................................................................................145 Water Development History .....................................................................................................................147 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................148 Conceptual Understanding of the Groundwater Flow System ...........................................................149 Water Budget ....................................................................................................................................149 Groundwater Movement .................................................................................................................152 Effects of Natural and Human Factors on Groundwater Quality ......................................................157 Summary......................................................................................................................................................160
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan March 2011 Edited By ELI CURIEL JR. ID Core Team Leader Approved By /C/ Annette H. Chavez March 4, 2011 Annette H. Chavez, Sierra Vista District Ranger Date Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1 STEP 1 – SETTING UP THE ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 3 STEP 2- DESCRIBING THE SITUATION ....................................................................................................... 5 TABLE 2.1 – EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 7 TABLE 2.2 - EXISTING ROAD CLASSIFICATIONS ............................................................................................ 13 STEP 3- IDENTIFYING ISSUES ..................................................................................................................... 13 STEP 4- ASSESSING BENEFITS, PROBLEMS AND RISKS OF THE EXISTING ROAD SYSTEM ... 21 LANDS .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 SOIL, WATER, AIR, AND FORESTRY ............................................................................................................... 31 Figure 4.1 Whetstone Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Granite Peak Stock Area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Geology of the Granite Peak stock area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors DeRuyter, Vernon Donald Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 05:09:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555132 GEOLOGY OF THE GRANITE PEAK STOCK AREA, WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA by Vernon Donald DeRuyter A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Re­ quests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major de­ partment or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the pro­ posed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Middle Canyon, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Geology of the Middle Canyon, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Burnette, Charles Richard, 1929- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 19:55:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/553905 GEOLOGY OF THE MIDDLE CANYON, WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA &*■ . by Charles R. Burnette A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial FulfiUment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1957 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re­ quirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to bor­ rowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without spe­ cial permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: w, / f r ? JOHN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Change at Kartchner Caverns: Trying to Separate Natural and Anthropogenic Changes
    Environmental Change at Kartchner Caverns: Trying to Separate Natural and Anthropogenic Changes Rickard S. Toomey, III, and Ginger Nolan Kartchner Caverns State Park, Arizona State Parks, Benson, AZ Abstract—Cave temperature and moisture levels are important factors in the environmental health of Kartchner Caverns. Monitoring indicates the cave has warmed and moisture levels have fallen over the past 14 years. Timing and patterns of change within the cave suggest that changes are due to development as a show cave. However, changes in other caves, surface temperature and precipitation, and in shallow local aquifers suggest that cave changes relate to regional patterns. Changes at Kartchner Caverns represent a combination of anthropogenic and regional natural causes. Separating these different factors is an important on-going goal in protecting the cave. Kartchner Caverns State Park (KCSP) is a show cave in The primary long-term temperature and humidity data southeastern Arizona. The cave was discovered in 1974 and from the cave come from Environmental Monitoring Stations became a State Park in 1988 (Tufts and Tenen 1999). After (EMS) within the cave (figure 1). These are locations at pre-development studies to assess the condition of the cave, which air, water, and soil temperature, relative humidity, to establish baseline data, and to determine how best to de- and pan evaporation are measured manually on a periodic velop the cave, Arizona State Parks began development of basis, usually weekly or monthly. Temperatures are measured the cave for ecological education and tourism. The develop- with small, digital probe thermometers; relative humidity is ment included creating tunnel entrances to the cave, building measured using a digital probe thermometer equipped as a trails for tours, and installing a lighting system.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment
    ARIZONAARIZONA’’SS WILDLIFEWILDLIFE LINKAGESLINKAGES ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT Workgroup Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Arizona’s Wildlife Linkages Assessment Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Siobhan E. Nordhaugen, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Evelyn Erlandsen, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Habitat Branch Paul Beier, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry Bruce D. Eilerts, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Ray Schweinsburg, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Terry Brennan, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest Ted Cordery, Bureau of Land Management Norris Dodd, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Melissa Maiefski, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group Janice Przybyl, The Sky Island Alliance Steve Thomas, Federal Highway Administration Kim Vacariu, The Wildlands Project Stuart Wells, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT First Printing Date: December, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written consent from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written consent of the copyright holder. Additional copies may be obtained by submitting a request to: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup E-mail: [email protected] 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Mission Statement “To identify and promote wildlife habitat connectivity using a collaborative, science based effort to provide safe passage for people and wildlife” 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Primary Contacts: Bruce D.
    [Show full text]
  • (U3&") Correlation of Arizona Paleozoic Formations
    S70YANOU) (U3&") BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 47, PP- 459-540. 1 PL., 5 FIGS. APRIL 30. 1936 um. CORRELATION OF ARIZONA PALEOZOIC FORMATIONS BY A. A. STOYANOW CONTENTS Page Utawriedgmaito «0 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: J® (V»brian . North-Central area 462 Southeastern area in general 465 ** Bisbee-Tucson sub-area 466 Bolsa quartzite, Pima sandstone, and Cochise formation 466 , Abrigo formation 467 rV Copper Queen limestone 469 Y: Rincon limestone 471 5 Tucson-Globe sub-area 472 m Relation of the Apache group to the Cambrian 472 Troy quartzite 474 Santa Catalina formation i 476 Abrigo formation 476 Peppersauce Canyon sandstone 476 if Clifton-Morenci district 478 jf Correlation 479 'OrdoTician 481 Dos Cabezas Mountains 481 . Clifton-Morenci district 483 Jan.. 484 T General statement 484 Southeastern area 486 "§, General statement 486 Picacho de Calera formation 488 % Lower Ouray formation 489 •j| Remarks 492 orth-Central area 495 | General statement 495 Jerome formation 495 £ Island Mesa beds 500 t| Mt. Elden section and Temple Butte limestone 500 Grand Wash Cliffs and Music Mountains 504 "ppian. 505 P«»eral statement 505 ' &utheastern area 505 Escabrosa limestone 505 ^Paradise formation 508 Clifton-Morenci district 511 iv' (459) LATION OF ARIZONA PALEOZOIC CAMBRIAN 467 TCSON SUB-AREA is 165 feet in thickness, and the thickness of the entire Cochise e, and Cochise formation.—At ^^tion in the Whetstone Mountains is 311 feet. jcson sub-area, is the Bolsa >bbly grits, and cross-bedded, vitrei Abripo formation.—In the type locality at Bisbee, the Abrigo has been a total thickness varying from 430 terized by Ransome as "thin-bedded impure, in part shaly, in part t,cho de Calera Hills, 25 miles west 'k^^eous very cherty dolomitic limestone.
    [Show full text]
  • You Can Learn More About the Chiricahuas
    Douglas RANGER DISTRICT www.skyislandaction.org 2-1 State of the Coronado Forest DRAFT 11.05.08 DRAFT 11.05.08 State of the Coronado Forest 2-2 www.skyislandaction.org CHAPTER 2 Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area The Chiricahua Mountain Range, located in the Natural History southeastern corner of the Coronado National Forest, The Chiricahua Mountains are known for their is one of the largest Sky Islands in the U.S. portion of amazing variety of terrestrial plants, animals, and the Sky Island region. The range is approximately 40 invertebrates. They contain exceptional examples of miles long by 20 miles wide with elevations ranging ecosystems that are rare in southern Arizona. While from 4,400 to 9,759 feet at the summit of Chiricahua the range covers only 0.5% of the total land area in Peak. The Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area Arizona, it contains 30% of plant species found in (EMA) is the largest Management Area on the Forest Arizona, and almost 50% of all bird species that encompassing 291,492 acres of the Chiricahua and regularly occur in the United States.1 The Chiricahuas Pedragosa Mountains. form part of a chain of mountains spanning from Protected by remoteness, the Chiricahuas remain central Mexico into southern Arizona. Because of one of the less visited ranges on the Coronado their proximity to the Sierra Madre, they support a National Forest. Formerly surrounded only by great diversity of wildlife found nowhere else in the ranches, the effects of Arizona’s explosive 21st century United States such as the Mexican Chickadee, whose population growth are beginning to reach the flanks only known breeding locations in the country are in of the Chiricahuas.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Forest Service Southwestern Region Coronado National Forest July 2017 Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]