The Persians Pdf Free Download
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bibliography
Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P. -
An Introduction to Old Persian Prods Oktor Skjærvø
An Introduction to Old Persian Prods Oktor Skjærvø Copyright © 2016 by Prods Oktor Skjærvø Please do not cite in print without the author’s permission. This Introduction may be distributed freely as a service to teachers and students of Old Iranian. In my experience, it can be taught as a one-term full course at 4 hrs/w. My thanks to all of my students and colleagues, who have actively noted typos, inconsistencies of presentation, etc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Select bibliography ................................................................................................................................... 9 Sigla and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 12 Lesson 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 Old Persian and old Iranian. .................................................................................................................... 13 Script. Origin. .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Script. Writing system. ........................................................................................................................... 14 The syllabary. .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Logograms. ............................................................................................................................................ -
The Scriptures and Inscription of Darius the Great
THE SCULPTURES AND INSCRIPTION OF BEHISTUN. PLATE I. Darius the Great, accompanied by attendants, with one foot placed on the prostrate body of the Pseudo-Smerdis (Gaumata). From the rock -sculpture at Behistun. THE SCULPTURES AND INSCRIPTION OF DARIUS THE GREAT ON THE ROCK OF BEHISTCN IN PERSIA. A NEW COLLATION OF THE PERSIAN, SUSIAN, AND BABYLONIAN TEXTS, WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS, ETC. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES, SOLD AT THE BRITISH MUSEUM; AND AT LONGMANS & Co., 39, PATERNOSTER Row; BERNARD QUARITCH, 15, PICCADILLY; ASHER & Co., 13, BEDFORD STREET, COVENT GARDEN ; AND HENRY FROWDE, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, AMEN CORNER, LONDON. 1907. [All rights reserved^ LONDON : HARRISON AND SONS, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HIS MAJESTY, ST. MARTIN'S LANE. CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ix INTRODUCTION xi LIST OF PROPER NAMES xlvii THE TEXT OF THE BEHISTUN INSCRIPTION : I. THE PERSIAN TEXT i EPIGRAPHS 84 II. THE SUSIAN VERSION 93 EPIGRAPHS 152 III. THE BABYLONIAN VERSION 159 'EPIGRAPHS . 207 INDEX 211 THE following pages contain the Persian text, with its Susian and Babylonian versions, of the Inscription which Darius the Great caused to be cut on the Rock of Behistun, which is situated in Persia on the ancient caravan route between Babylon and Ecbatana. The Inscription was first copied and translated by the late Major-General Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlinson, Bart, G.C.B., whose study of it enabled him to bring to a successful issue the decipherment of the Cuneiform Inscriptions. His edition of the Persian text, accompanied by a Commentary, appeared in the tenth volume of the Joitrnal of the Royal Asiatic Society in 1847, and his final edition of the texts of the Babylonian version was published by the Trustees of the British Museum in Cuneiform Inscriptions of Western Asia, Vol. -
The Behistun Inscription and the Res Gestae Divi Augusti
Phasis 15-16, 2012-2013 Δημήτριος Μαντζίλας (Θράκη) The Behistun Inscription and the Res Gestae Divi Augusti Intertextuality between Greek and Latin texts is well known and – in recent decades – has been well studied. It seems though that common elements also appear in earlier texts, from other, mostly oriental countries, such as Egypt, Persia or Israel. In this article we intend to demonstrate the case of a Persian and a Latin text, in order to support the hypothesis of a common Indo-European literature (in addition to an Indo-European mythology and language). The Behistun Inscription,1 whose name comes from the anglicized version of Bistun or Bisutun (Bagastana in Old Persian), meaning “the place or land of gods”, is a multi-lingual inscription (being thus an equivalent of the Rosetta stone) written in three different cuneiform script extinct languages: Old Persian, Elamite (Susian), and Babylonian (Accadian).2 A fourth version is an Aramaic translation found on the 1 For the text see Adkins L., Empires of the Plain: Henry Rawlinson and the Lost Languages of Babylon, New York 2003; Rawlinson H. C., Archaeologia, 1853, vol. xxxiv, 74; Campbell Thompson R., The Rock of Behistun, In Sir J. A. Hammerton (ed.), Wonders of the Past, New York 1937, II, 760–767; Cameron G. G., Darius Carved History on Ageless Rock, National Geographic Magazine, 98 (6), December 1950, 825– 844; Rubio G., Writing in Another Tongue: Alloglottography in the Ancient Near East, in: S. Sanders (ed.), Margins of Writing, Origins of Cultures, Chicago 2007², 33–70 (= OIS, 2); Hinz W., Die Behistan-Inschrift des Darius, AMI, 7, 1974, 121-134 (translation). -
From Persepolis to Jerusalem: a Reevaluation of Old Persian-Hebrew Contact in the Achaemenid Period
Vetus Testamentum 65 (�0�5) �5�-�67 Vetus Testamentum brill.com/vt From Persepolis to Jerusalem: A Reevaluation of Old Persian-Hebrew Contact in the Achaemenid Period Aren Wilson-Wright University of Texas at Austin Waggener 14a, 2210 Speedway C3400, Austin, TX 78712 512-417-4606 [email protected] Abstract This paper examines the effects and mechanisms of Old Persian contact on Biblical Hebrew. I first reevaluate the number and distribution of Old Persian loanwords in the Hebrew Bible. Then I demonstrate that there was direct contact between speak- ers of Old Persian and speakers of Hebrew in the Achaemenid period beginning under Artaxerxes I, before proposing the existence of two Old Persian calques in Biblical Hebrew. The distribution of these Old Persian loanwords and calques strengthens the case for distinguishing between Late Biblical Hebrew and Classical Biblical Hebrew on linguistic grounds. With one exception, these features cluster in well-known Late Biblical Hebrew texts. Keywords late Biblical Hebrew – language contact – linguistic dating – Persian period The administration of the Persian Empire (529-333 b.c.e.) was a multilingual affair. Members of the Achaemenid Court centered in Southeastern Iran and * An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew session at the 2011 Society of Biblical Literature annual meeting in San Francisco. My thanks go to the members of the audience for their comments and critiques. I would also like to thank Naʾama Pat-El, Noam Mizrahi, Saralyn McKinnon-Crowley, and Yuhan S. D. Vevaina for commenting on an earlier draft of this paper and John Makujina for providing me with a copy of his dis- sertation. -
The Achaemenid Empire in South Asia and Recent Excavations in Akra in Northwest Pakistan Peter Magee Bryn Mawr College, [email protected]
Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Classical and Near Eastern Archaeology Faculty Classical and Near Eastern Archaeology Research and Scholarship 2005 The Achaemenid Empire in South Asia and Recent Excavations in Akra in Northwest Pakistan Peter Magee Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Cameron Petrie Robert Knox Farid Khan Ken Thomas Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/arch_pubs Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Custom Citation Magee, Peter, Cameron Petrie, Richard Knox, Farid Khan, and Ken Thomas. 2005. The Achaemenid Empire in South Asia and Recent Excavations in Akra in Northwest Pakistan. American Journal of Archaeology 109:711-741. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/arch_pubs/82 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Achaemenid Empire in South Asia and Recent Excavations in Akra in Northwest Pakistan PETER MAGEE, CAMERON PETRIE, ROBERT KNOX, FARID KHAN, AND KEN THOMAS Abstract subject peoples. A significant proportion of this The impact of the Achaemenid annexation of north- research has been carried out on the regions that westernPakistan has remained a focus for archaeological border the classical world, in particular Anatolia,1 researchfor more than a century.A lack of well-stratified the Levant,2and Egypt.3In contrast, the far eastern settlementsand a focus on artifactsthat are not necessar- extent of the which is the for the effects of control empire, encompassed by ily appropriate assessing imperial borders of Pakistan and haveuntil now obfuscatedour understandingof this issue. -
Goodthoughts Goodwords Gooddeeds Manashni
goodthoughts goodwords gooddeeds Manashni Volume 31 | Issue 4 | November 2013 Calendar Of Events Month Events Dates Sunday School starts at 10.30am with pot luck lunch 03/11/2013 Nov 2013 Seniors’ Get Together 17/11/2013 Table Tennis Tournament and Working Bee 24/11/2013 Sunday School starts at 10.30am. End-of-year Party 01/12/2013 AZA Annual Cricket Match 08/12/2013 Dec 2013 Zarthost-no-Diso Jashan and Ghambar 26/12/2013 Working Bee 29/12/2013 Jashan in Memory of Nauzer Ostowari, Arbab Rostom Morvareed Guiv,Mehraban Zartoshty 12/01/2014 Jan 2014 Seniors’ Get Together 19/01/2014 Working Bee 26/01/2014 Sunday School starts at 10.30am with pot luck lunch Jashne Sadeh (30th Jan, creation of fire & 50 days to Nowruz) 02/02/2014 Feb 2014 Seniors’ Get Together 16/02/2014 Working Bee 23/02/2014 Sunday School starts at 10.30am with pot luck lunch 02/03/2014 AmAZAng Race 09/03/2014 Seniors Get Together 16/03/2014 Mar 2014 AZA Nowruz Function and HSC Award Presentation 22/03/2014 Zarthost’s Birthday 29/03/2014 Working Bee 30/03/2014 Sunday School starts at 10.30am with pot luck lunch 06/04/2014 Carrom Tournament 13/04/2014 Apr 2014 Easter Long Weekend Seniors’ Get Together 20/04/2014 Working Bee 27/04/2014 196 Annangrove Road, Annangrove, NSW 2156. www.aza.org.au Sunday School starts at 10.30am with pot luck lunch 04/05/2014 May 2014 Seniors’ Get Together 18/05/2014 Working Bee 25/05/2014 Sunday School starts at 10.30am with pot luck lunch 01/06/2014 Annual Jashan and Ghambar. -
Introduction
The oldest photo of Darius's inscription in Behistun: A new document CIDOC 2018 Heraklion, Crete, Greece THE OLDEST PHOTO OF DARIUS'S INSCRIPTION IN BEHISTUN: A NEW DOCUMENT Keyvan Mahmoudi¹, Ali Rangchian² . ¹ Malek National Library and Museum Institution, Melal Mottahed St, 111555/547, Tehran, Iran ² Art faculty of Semnan University, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran [email protected] Abstract. Darius the Great’s engraving on Mount Behistun is the longest and one of the most precious pieces of the world's cuneiform inscriptions. Apart from retelling the initial events of the reign of Darius, decoding its tri- lingual royal text established the starting point for the field of Assyriology. It was thought that the first photographs of this monument were recorded by American scholar “Abraham Valentine Williams Jackson” in 1903. In this article, for the first time, we introduced an Iranian pioneer Iqbal al-Saltanah, known as Agha Reza Akkasbashi. He prevails the royal photographer in the court of Naser-al-Din Shah Qajar. Agha Reza’s photo of the Behistun inscription is 33 years older than Jackson's Images and shows the general status of this important inscription in the second half of the nineteenth century. Study of this important document can be seen from two different angles. First: an adequate understanding of the conservation status of the Behistun inscription in the nineteenth century and secondly: the history of Iranian’s documentation activities for historical monuments and sites. Keywords: Behistun, Photography, Assyriology Introduction On the 2800 - meter Behistun Mountain, 36 kilometers northeast of Kermanshah City, the inscription of Darius the Great is located and engraved on a cliff at a height of 100 meters, viewing the important historical road and the caravan route linking the land of Media and the central Iran to the Mesopotamian plains. -
Thermopylae and Rise of an Empire
SPARTA 0. SPARTA - Story Preface 1. REVENGING MARATHON 2. SPARTA 3. LIFE IN SPARTA 4. LEONIDAS 5. GORGO 6. XERXES and the IMMORTALS 7. THERMOPYLAE 8. BATTLE at the HOT GATES 9. EPHIALTES - THE TRAITOR 10. THEMISTOCLES against XERXES 11. GREEKS DEFEAT the PERSIANS This image, depicting a Spartan warrior, appears on an ancient Greek vase which is dated circa 480 BC. That is about ten years after the Athenians battled the Persians at the Battle of Marathon. Image online, via Encyclopedia Britannica. Click on the image for a much-better view. For centuries before - and after - the first Persian invasion at Marathon, ancient Greece was not a united country. Cities were states unto themselves, each with their own government. Sometimes the cities helped each other; sometimes they fought each other. To avenge his father's loss at Marathon, Xerxes formed an army with men from many different countries. All part of his empire, the united invasion force even included subjected Greeks. One Greek - Demaratus - was formerly a king of Sparta. He would play a key role as Xerxes' advisor. Where was ancient Sparta? What was life like there? Why would her former king advise the enemy? Located on the Peloponnesian Peninsula, the city - and its people - have an interesting history. At the time of our story, Sparta was known as Lacedaemon. Both names are rooted in Greek mythology. Lacedaemon, son of the chief god Zeus, was married to Sparta. Naming the country he ruled after himself, Lacedaemon called his capital city Sparta, after his wife. Mountains - including Mt. Taygetus - protect Sparta on three sides. -
Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History 2020 Number 27 Editor: Karl-Johan Lindholm Editorial Board: Assyriology: Olof Pedersén
JAAH Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History 2020 Number 27 Editor: Karl-Johan Lindholm Editorial Board: Assyriology: Olof Pedersén. Archaeology: Anders Kaliff, Neil Price. Classical Archaeology and Ancient History: Gunnel Ekroth, Lars Karlsson. Egyptology: Andreas Dorn. Editorial history: www.arkeologi.uu.se/Journal/ ISSN: 2001-1199 Published: 2020-10-09 at http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-420702 The Bīsotūn Inscription - A Jeopardy of Achaemenid History Amir Ahmadi1 1Amir Ahmadi, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. [email protected] Department of Archaeology and Ancient History Uppsala University, Sweden 1 ABSTRACT According to the currently favoured view among historians of the Persian Empire, the Bīsotūn Inscription is a deceitful piece of propaganda whose purpose was to resolve Darius’s legitimacy problem. To this effect, Darius cobbles a family relation with Cyrus and fabricates the story of a magus who impersonates Smerdis, son of Cyrus, and usurps the throne. This view, however, contradicts not only the Bīsotūn Inscription but also the ancient Greek testimonies. This article examines the arguments historians have given for their position. Since all views of the two issues in question are necessarily interpretations of the relevant sources that rely on argumentation, reasons and inferences must stand up to critical scrutiny. Keywords Achaemenid history; Bīsotūn Inscription; Persian Empire; Darius; Cyrus; Herodotus. 2 AMIR AHMADI The Bīsotūn Inscription - A Jeopardy of Achaemenid History Introduction The prevalent view of the Bīsotūn Inscription in contemporary histories of the Achaemenid Empire has two striking characteristics. The first one is that it contradicts the Bīsotūn Inscription and the classical sources regarding the rise of Darius on key points. -
A Comparison and Contrast of the History of Christianity As It
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 12-2007 A Comparison and Contrast of the History of Christianity as it Developed in Cappadocia and Armenia during the First Five Centuries AD Judy Henzel Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Henzel, Judy, "A Comparison and Contrast of the History of Christianity as it Developed in Cappadocia and Armenia during the First Five Centuries AD" (2007). All Theses. 255. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/255 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARISON AND CONTRAST OF THE HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITYAS IT DEVELOPED IN CAPPADOCIA AND ARMENIA DURING THE FIRST FIVE CENTURIES AD ___________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University ___________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Arts History ___________________________________________________________ by Judy H. Henzel December 2008 ___________________________________________________________ Accepted by: Dr. Elizabeth Carney, Committee Chair Dr. Stephen Grosby Dr. Alan Grubb ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to examine key political, cultural or environmental factors which affected the rise and development of Christianity in two specific regions of eastern Anatolia during the first to fifth centuries AD. Hagiography and chronicle often portray the progress of Christianity as deterministic and providential. However, unique cultural and political elements proved very influential in shaping the success and forms of Christianity in Cappadocia and Armenia, particularly in the fourth and fifth centuries AD. -
Parte Ii Scritture E Libri Nell'antica Mesopotamia 3
PARTE II SCRITTURE E LIBRI NELL’ANTICA MESOPOTAMIA 3 7 - I primi tentativi di decifrazione La lettura delle scritture cuneiformi passò attraverso tre successive fasi, determinate dalla disponibilità dei documenti. Anche le antiche civiltà mesopotamiche, come quella egizia, erano state cancellate dal tempo, senza lasciare traccia. In mancanza di una spedizione napoleonica, le scoperte archeologiche presero avvio relativamente tardi, dopo il 1840. Si conoscevano invece in Europa, sin dal Seicento, alcune sparse testimonianze della scrittura cuneiforme. Come si è visto, la storia degli antichi Imperi orientali abbraccia circa 3.500 anni, periodo lungo il quale si spiega anche l’impiego delle scritture cuneiformi. In questo ambito l’Impero achemenide è un episodio di breve durata; la scrittura persepolitana a sua volta è una scrittura artificiale, strettamente legata a quell’Impero, e ne condivise il destino. Eppure la riscoperta delle civiltà mesopotamiche partì proprio da Persepoli e dalla sua scrittura. La ragione è evidente: le città più antiche, in Mesopotamia, erano state sommerse dalla terra e dalla sabbia, per formare strane collline a forma di tumulo, dette Tell, che sorgevano qua e là nella pianura del Tigri e dell’Eufrate e dalle quali spesso i locali attingevano mattoni per le proprie costruzioni. Le monumentali rovine di Persepoli, in Iran, rimasero invece scoperte, quindi visibili a tutti, anche se nessuno sapeva identificarle correttamente. Ma anche se le rovine delle città mesopotamiche fossero rimaste visibili, ben poche iscrizioni sarebbe stato possibile trovare su di esse: a differenza degli Egizi, Assiri e Babilonesi non avevano infatti l’abitudine di ricoprire di scritte le pareti degli edifici.