DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization 1 Urban and Community Forestry 2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS Planning Maps for the Department of Forestry and Fire Management 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas About the 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas This collection of maps summarizes the results of the 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization analysis of the Urban and Community Forestry Program (UCF) at the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management (DFFM). The purpose of the analysis was to assess existing urban forests in Arizona’s communities and identify shade tree planting needs. The spatial analysis, based on U.S. Census Block Group polygons, generated seven sub-indices for criteria identified by an expert panel: population density, lack of canopy cover, low-income, traffic proximity, sustainability, air quality, and urban heat effect. The seven sub-indices were combined into one Shade Tree Planting Priority Index and further summarized into a Shade Tree Planting Priority Ranking. The resulting reports, maps, and GIS data provide compiled information that can be easily used for identifying areas for strategic shade tree planting within a community or across Arizona’s major cities and towns. These maps provide limited detail for conveying the scale and depth of the analysis results which – for more detailed use – are best explored through the analysis report, interactive maps, and the GIS data available through the UCF Program webpage at https://forestryandfire.az.gov/forestry-community-forestry/urban-community-forestry/projects. Note: At the time of publication, two known analysis area errors have been identified. A few of Safford’s incorporated easements were not captured correctly. Sahuarita (incorporated) and Green Valley (unincorporated) have been combined into one Census Urbanized Area polygon instead of splitting them apart into separate communities. The analysis areas, source data, and methodologies will be improved at the next analysis round. How to Use and Cite Use is granted to public agencies, educational institutions, non-profit organizations and private individuals for non-commercial purposes. For commercial use of the Department of Forestry and Fire Management maps and data see Arizona Revised Statutes 39-121.03. The Department makes no warranties, implied or expressed, with respect to the accuracy of and the use of this data for any specific purpose. Users are required to make their own assessment of the data for any specific use. Cite this product as: UCF. 2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas. Phoenix: Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management, 2016. Analysis Summary Index Description Data Source Calculation A Population Density 2010 Census population density per Census Block Group (pop / square mile) EPA EJscreen; Census Bureau Index = normalized population density B Lack of Canopy Cover 2015/2016 i-Tree Canopy urban canopy cover estimate per incorporated or major community (%) UCF Index = normalized % urban tree cover C Low-Income 2010 Census population at below two times the poverty level per Census Block Group (%) EPA EJscreen; Census Bureau Index = normalized % Low-Income D Traffic Proximity EPA traffic proximity index per Census Block Group EPA EJscreen Index = normalized traffic proximity index E Sustainability 2016 Tree City USA status per incorporated community (1, 0) Tree City USA Index = normalized Tree City USA status F Air Quality Combination of EPA Ozone and PM 2.5 concentration scores per Census Block Group EPA EJscreen Score = normalized Ozone concentration + normalized PM 2.5 concentration Index = normalized Score G Heat and Developed Product of Nightly MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST, 1 km resolution) averages (June 2013, 2014, 2015; MODIS; NLCD Score = normalized average MODIS LST Imperviousness in Fahrenheit) and NLCD 2011 Percent Developed Imperviousness (%, 30 m resolution) × normalized NLCD Imperviousness Index = normalized Score Shade Tree Planting The Master Score is the average of all sub-indices per analysis polygon. The Master Index is based on ASLD (Arizona State Land ( + + + + + + ) = Prioritization Index normalizing the Master Score per analysis polygon among towns with similar population sizes (2015 ASLD): Department 2015 City 7 Index = normalized Scores grouped by Population Class 1 to 1,000 6 communities 1,001 to 5,000 28 communities Population); Census Bureau 5,001 to 10,000 16 communities 10,001 to 50,000 27 communities 50,001 to 100,000 7 communities 100,001 and larger 10 communities 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Urban and Community Forestry, Department of Forestry and Fire Management Apache Junction - Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Index Usery W McKellips P i n a l W McKellips Blvd Blvd Mountain B C o u n t y W Low 0 u l a l d Rec Area Equestrian s s o e h k Park g ee W sh Wa High 1 N Meridian Dr Prospector Park E Lost The redder colors indicate areas that might benefit E Brown Rd W Lost Dutchman Blvd Dutchman Blvd the most from future tree plantings, based on the N Meridian Rd analyzed criteria. Tonto Weeks N Idaho Rd Wash National Rd ST88 Forest Prioritization Metrics N Meridian N Ironwood Dr Average Prioritization Index: 0.552 Population Size Class: 10,001 to 50,000 E University Dr W Superstition Blvd E Superstition Blvd N Cortez Rd N Crismon Rd Priority Ranking within Number 10 out of 27 Population Size Class: N Apache N Meridian Rd Trl Apache Contributing Factors N Mountain View Rd Junction Estimated Canopy Cover 4.00% Tree City USA Certified : No E Broadway Rd S Signal Butte Rd E Broadway Ave W Broadway Ave E Broadway Ave Average Population Density Index: 0.065 Average Low Income Index: 0.372 Average Traffic Proximity Index: 0.010 M a r i c o p a S Cortez Rd C o u n t y Average Air Quality Index: 0.702 S Crismon Rd Average Heat and Developed S Ironwood Dr 0.337 Imperviousness Index: Weeks Wash E Southern Ave W Southern Ave E Southern Ave S Mountain View Rd S Goldfield Rd Analysis Area: Incorporated Area 2013 S Meridian Rd S Tomahawk Rd C A P Canal U t a h C o l o r a d o ST88 60 Superstition N e v a d a Apache ¤£ Mountain Las Creek Club Vegas Golf Club E Baseline Rd W Baseline Ave E Baseline Ave S Ironwood Dr S Goldfield Rd S Tomahawk Rd Gold N e w M e x i c o Camp C a l i f o r n i a A r i z o n a Phoenix Mesa S iphon Draw Tucson s g d in R K h c S n a R E Elliot Rd The Department makes no warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to the information shown on this map. 0 0.5 1 2 Miles WG Reference Layer Credits: Esri StreetMap North America 2013; I Scale 1:54,000 1/3/2017 Arizona State Land Department 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Urban and Community Forestry, Department of Forestry and Fire Management Avondale - Arizona E Pajaro N 129th Ave Ln irline Cana N 126th W Highland A l Dr N 154th Ave W Elm N 93rd Dr W Elm s N 153rd Val Verde N 82nd rle Ave d Ave Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Index a W Aldea l N 89th St W Elm St h W Elm W Highland Ave Ln St C e E Bird Ln Cir W t Ave d i e W lv Cir f s B St v h 1 W Minnezona A W Campbell N 95th Ln 96th Dr W Montecito c d 0 Low 0 W Juniper N 95thAve t 1 Ave N 91st Dr Dr N AlcalaN W Campbell N 92nd R W Llano Dr Ave Ln i E Acacia Ave h 90thAve L N Dr t W Roma Ave N 100th Dr W Turney W Turney N Village Pkwy Cir N 100th Ave N 96th Ave 4 N 103rdAve N W Apodaca 2 Ave W MacKenzie Ave W Serrano Ave 1 e Dr Redondo N 87th Dr W Glenrosa e Dr v Dr W Palo N 107th Airline v N 152nd Dr Brea Dr Canal W Ave St Dr N W A W Devonshire Dr N El Mirage Rd A Castillo Ave Cordoniz W Indian N 83rd Dr High 1 Wigwam W Indian h Wigwam Blvd Palm W Monterosa St t E Dr S N 81st Ln W Wigwam Blvd N 111th N 150th Ave Ln N 107th Ln 7 W Dana N 85thAve W N 125th Dr N 81st Dr Blvd N 127th Dr Rd School Rd N 99th Ln School Piccadilly Rd S I St 8 W n W PiccadillyLn Rd N 103rd The redder colors indicate areas that might benefit c N Old Litchfield Rd h d W Clarendon W DanaDr Ln W Indianola N Dr N 151st N 100thAve W Fairmount Ave i N 85th Ave Dr o a Ave N 85th Creek Pkwy o n Ave Roose the most from future tree plantings, based on the N Pebble W Weldon Ave velt N 88th l Ln N 153rd Dr R C W Orange N W Indian ana analyzed criteria. N 131st l N 86th Ave d N 125th Dr Blossom Ln W Orange N 151st Dr School Rd Ln W Ashla W Laurelwood 81st Dr L 101 N 84th W Avalon W Sieno Pl Blossom Ln ST Ave W Crenshaw Ln 86th Ave W Avalon i Way W Monterey N 130th N 150th t Ln Ave 81st Dr Dr Dr Dr c W Clover Way R N 133rdAve Way N 107th Ave h W Avalon N 81st Dr N 142nd Dr d f N 88th Dr Prioritization Metrics W Sage Dr W Earll Dr N 99th Ave i Dr W Avalon Dr N 91st Ave N AvalonB e N 136th Ave 112th Ave W Avalon Dr N 83rd Ave W Ivory Ln N 86th Verde Ln Dr y l Ave W d W Thomas N 89thAve Average Prioritization Index: 0.650 p W Thomas Rd W Edgemont Azure Ln N 87th Dr 136th W Thomas Rd W Thomas Rd W Thomas Rd N 156th Dr Ave Rd N 152nd Dr N 143rd Ave N 108th W Virginia Ave Ave W Thomas Rd N 137th Windsor W Roanoke Ave Population Size Class: 50,001 to 100,000 W Edgemont Ave W Windsor W Cambridge124th h Ave t Ave W Virginia W Cambridge Ave Ave W Virginia h t W Sheridan Ave 8 Dr Ave N 104th N 103rd Ave Ave r 2 Ave Ave 0 N 90th Priority Ranking within Dr W Baker n St W Encanto 1 D d N 126th Dr 1 W Wilshire r Number 1 out of 7 L e W Alvarado Dr W Encanto 1 3 114th Ln v 129Ave Blvd Ave W Enc 9 W Sheridan St Population Size Class: a N nt Dr A W Palm W Palmilla Blvd o N Blvd W Encanto Blvd N N 103rd W EncantoLn Blvd N 85thAve Valley BlvdBlvd W Monte Harbor 91st Gln N 146th Ave
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Index 1 INDEX
    Index 1 INDEX A Blue Spring 76, 106, 110, 115 Bluff Spring Trail 184 Adeii Eechii Cliffs 124 Blythe 198 Agate House 140 Blythe Intaglios 199 Agathla Peak 256 Bonita Canyon Drive 221 Agua Fria Nat'l Monument 175 Booger Canyon 194 Ajo 203 Boundary Butte 299 Ajo Mountain Loop 204 Box Canyon 132 Alamo Canyon 205 Box (The) 51 Alamo Lake SP 201 Boyce-Thompson Arboretum 190 Alstrom Point 266, 302 Boynton Canyon 149, 161 Anasazi Bridge 73 Boy Scout Canyon 197 Anasazi Canyon 302 Bright Angel Canyon 25, 51 Anderson Dam 216 Bright Angel Point 15, 25 Angels Window 27 Bright Angel Trail 42, 46, 49, 61, 80, 90 Antelope Canyon 280, 297 Brins Mesa 160 Antelope House 231 Brins Mesa Trail 161 Antelope Point Marina 294, 297 Broken Arrow Trail 155 Apache Junction 184 Buck Farm Canyon 73 Apache Lake 187 Buck Farm Overlook 34, 73, 103 Apache-Sitgreaves Nat'l Forest 167 Buckskin Gulch Confluence 275 Apache Trail 187, 188 Buenos Aires Nat'l Wildlife Refuge 226 Aravaipa Canyon 192 Bulldog Cliffs 186 Aravaipa East trailhead 193 Bullfrog Marina 302 Arch Rock 366 Bull Pen 170 Arizona Canyon Hot Springs 197 Bush Head Canyon 278 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 216 Arizona Trail 167 C Artist's Point 250 Aspen Forest Overlook 257 Cabeza Prieta 206 Atlatl Rock 366 Cactus Forest Drive 218 Call of the Canyon 158 B Calloway Trail 171, 203 Cameron Visitor Center 114 Baboquivari Peak 226 Camp Verde 170 Baby Bell Rock 157 Canada Goose Drive 198 Baby Rocks 256 Canyon del Muerto 231 Badger Creek 72 Canyon X 290 Bajada Loop Drive 216 Cape Final 28 Bar-10-Ranch 19 Cape Royal 27 Barrio
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. July 22, 2021 Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015 Effective March 17, 2021 The federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires states and federally recognized Indian tribes to adopt water quality standards in order to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's Waters" (CWA, 1988). The attached WQS document is in effect for Clean Water Act purposes with the exception of the following provisions. Navajo Nation’s previously approved criteria for these provisions remain the applicable for CWA purposes. The “Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015” (NNSWQS 2015) made changes amendments to the “Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2007” (NNSWQS 2007). For federal Clean Water Act permitting purposes, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) must approve these changes to the NNSWQS 2007 which are found in the NNSWQS 2015. The USEPA did not approve of three specific changes which were made to the NNSWQS 2007 and are in the NNSWQS 2015. (October 15, 2020 Letter from USEPA to Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency). The three specific changes which USEPA did not accept are: 1) Aquatic and Wildlife Habitat Designated Use - Suspended Solids Changes (NNSWQS 2015 Section 207.E) The suspended soils standard for aquatic and wildlife habitat designated use was changed to only apply to flowing (lotic) surface waters and not to non-flowing (lentic) surface waters.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 March 1999
    NAVAJO NATION SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 2007 (Photograph of the Little Colorado River near Grand Falls on January 4, 2005) Prepared by: Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Water Quality Program Post Office Box 339 Window Rock, Arizona 86515 (928) 871-7690 Passed by Navajo Nation Resources Committee on May 13, 2008 Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2007 Navajo Nation EPA Water Quality Program TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS - GENERAL PROVISIONS § 101 TITLE ................................................................................................................................ 1 § 102 AUTHORITY .................................................................................................................... 1 § 103 PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................... 1 § 104 DEFINITIONS................................................................................................................... 1 § 105 SEVERABILITY............................................................................................................... 6 PART II SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS § 201 ANTIDEGRADATION POLICY ..................................................................................... 7 § 202 NARRATIVE SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ...................................... 7 § 203 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ............................................................................................ 9 § 204 NARRATIVE
    [Show full text]
  • 147 Occurrence and Distribution of Flash
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS WR- 147 OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF FLASH FLOODS IN THE WESTERN REGION Thomas L. Dietrich Western Region Headquarters Hydrology Division Salt Lake City, Utah December 1979 UNITED STATES / NATIONAL OCEANIC AND / National Weather DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION // Service Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary Richard A. Frank, Admtnistrator Richard E. Hallgren. Director This Technical Memorandum has been reviewed and is approved for pub! ication by Scientific Services Division, Western Region. L. W. Snellman, Chief Scientific Services Division Western Region Headquarters Salt Lake City, Utah ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Tables and Figures iv I. Introduction 1 II. Climatology of the Western Region by Geographical Divisions 1 a. Pacific Coast .. 1 b. Cascade ~ Sierra Nevada Mountains. 4 c. Intermountain Plateau. 4 d. Rocky Mountain Region. 4 e. Great Plains (eastern Montana) 8 III. Meteorology of Flash Floods .... 8 IV. Geographical Properties influencing Flash Floods. 10 a. Topography, Soils and Surface Cover. 10 b. Urbanization 10 V. Data Analysis .. 10 VI. Geographical Areas of Significant Concentrations of Flash Flood Events .... 17 a. Wasatch Front, Utah. 17 b. Central and Southern Arizona 19 c. Utah - Southern Mountains, Sevier Valley and Cedar City Area 19 VII. Brief Description of Flash Floods in the Western Region, 1950- 1969, as reported in the USGS Annual Flood Summaries. 23 VIII. References. iii TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1. Flash Floods by Geographical Region 16 Table 2. Flash Floods by Month and State . • 17 Figure 1. Geographic Regions of the United States 2 Figure 2. Coastal Valley, south of Eureka, California 3 Figure 3. Mean Annual Number of Days with Thunderstorms .
    [Show full text]
  • ARIZONA STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM BRIDGE RECORD As of 4/12/2021 Sorted by Route and Milepost
    ARIZONA STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM BRIDGE RECORD As of 4/12/2021 Sorted by Route and Milepost Agency Str No Rt No Rt Suffix Rt MP Bridge Name District Original Construction Project No Year Built Mat Type No of Spans Max Span Length Ft Structure Length Ft Skew Roadway Appr Width Ft Bridge Roadway Width Ft Allow Vert Clearance Ft Overlay In Bridge Rail Type Def SR Bridge Condition NHS ADOT 01829 40 S 1.27 W Wslw SPUR RR OP Northeast RS-549(1) 1975 5 2 3 81 187 32 40 44 22.81 111 87.7 Fair ADOT 00849 40 269.97 Jackrabbit TI OP EB Northeast I-40-4(16) 1967 2 1 3 33 89 0 38 38 15.33 911 81.0 Fair NHS ADOT 00850 40 269.97 Jackrabbit TI OP WB Northeast I-40-4(16) 1967 2 1 3 33 89 0 38 38 15.25 911 81.0 Fair NHS ADOT 02080 40 271.47 Manila Wash Br (SFR) Northeast NON FA-40 1949 1949 1 4 2 37 76 0 40 40 0 3 500 91.0 Fair ADOT 00851 40 271.48 Manila Wash Br EB Northeast I-40-4(16) 1969 2 1 4 30 112 30 38 38 0 2 811 96.2 Fair NHS ADOT 00852 40 271.48 Manila Wash Br WB Northeast I-40-4(16) 1969 2 1 4 30 112 30 38 38 0 2 811 84.3 Fair NHS ADOT 04264 40 273.11 RCB & NFR Northeast I-40-4(16) 1965 2 19 3 10 32 0 104 0 0 - 79.8 Good NHS ADOT 06727 40 273.4 S Fr Rd RCB Northeast I-40-4(49) 1980 2 19 4 10 44 14 26 0 0 - 99.7 Fair ADOT 01893 40 274.76 W Joseph City TI UP Northeast I-40-4(49) 1980 6 6 2 127 257 0 34 38 16.45 3 911 98.9 Fair ADOT 01894 40 275.34 Joseph Cty Wsh Br EB Northeast I-40-4(49) 1980 2 1 4 35 130 0 38 42 0 911 97.3 Fair NHS ADOT 01895 40 275.34 Joseph Cty Wsh Br WB Northeast I-40-4(49) 1980 2 1 4 35 130 0 38 42 0 911 97.3 Fair NHS ADOT 02428
    [Show full text]
  • River Flowing from the Sunrise: an Environmental History of the Lower San Juan
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2000 River Flowing from the Sunrise: An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan James M. Aton Robert S. McPherson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Recommended Citation Aton, James M. and McPherson, Robert S., "River Flowing from the Sunrise: An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan" (2000). All USU Press Publications. 128. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/128 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. River Flowing from the Sunrise An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan A. R. Raplee’s camp on the San Juan in 1893 and 1894. (Charles Goodman photo, Manuscripts Division, Marriott Library, University of Utah) River Flowing from the Sunrise An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan James M. Aton Robert S. McPherson Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright © 2000 Utah State University Press all rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800 Manfactured in the United States of America Printed on acid-free paper 654321 000102030405 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Aton, James M., 1949– River flowing from the sunrise : an environmental history of the lower San Juan / James M. Aton, Robert S. McPherson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-87421-404-1 (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-87421-403-3 (pbk.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin
    Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin By H. P. Eisenhuth GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 579 Washington J 968 United States Department of the Interior STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary Geological Survey William T. Pecora, Director Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20242 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin By H. P. Eisenhuth INTRODUCTION This report lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the Colorado River basin for which records have been or are to bepublishedinreportsoftheGeological Survey for periods through September 30, 1967. It supersedes Geobgical Survey Circular 509. Basic data on surface-water supply have been published in an annual series of water-supply papers consisting of several volumes, including one each for the States of Alaska and Hawaii. The area of the other 48 States is divided into 14 parts whose boundaries coincide with certain natural drainage lines. Prior to 1951, the records for the 48 States were published in 14 volumes, one for each of the parts. From 1951 to 1960, the records for the 48 States were pub~.ished annually in 18 volumes, there being 2 volumes each for Parts 1, 2, 3, and 6. The boundaries of the various parts are shown on the map in figure 1. Beginning in 1961, the annual series ofwater-supplypapers on surface-water supply was changed to a 5-year S<~ries. Records for the period 1961-65 will bepublishedin a series of water-supply papers using the same 14-part division for the 48 States, but most parts will be further subdivided into two or more volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of September 1970 in Arizona, Utah and Colorado
    WATER-RESOURCES REPORT NUMBER FORTY - FOUR ARIZONA STATE LAND DEPARTMENT ANDREW L. BETTWY. COMMISSIONER FLOODS OF SEPTE1VIBER 1970 IN ARIZONA, UTAH, AND COLORADO BY R. H. ROESKE PREPARED BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PHOENIX. ARIZONA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR APRIL 1971 'Water Rights Adjudication Team Civil Division Attorney Generars Office: CONTENTS Page Introduction - - ----------------------------------------------- 1 Acknowledgments -------------------------------------------- 1 The storm ---------------------------- - - --------------------- 3 Descri¢ionof floods ----------------------------------------- 4 Southern Arizona----------------------------------------- 4 Centrru Arizona------------------------------------------ 4 Northeastern Arizona------------------------------------- 13 Southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado --------------- 14 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 1-5. Maps showing: 1. Area of report ----------------------------- 2 2. Rainfrul, September 4- 6, 1970, in southern and central Arizona -------------------------- 5 3. Rainfall, September 5- 6, 1970, in northeastern Arizona, southeastern Utah, and southwestern Colorado -------------------------------- 7 4. Location of sites where flood data were collected for floods of September 4-7, 1970, in Ariz ona ------------------------ - - - - - - - - - 9 5. Location of sites where flood data were collected for floods of September 5- 6, 12-14, 1970, in northeastern Arizona, southeastern Utah, and southwestern Colorado-------------------- 15 ITI IV TABLES Page TABLE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo & Apache Counties
    Consumer Guide for Substance Use Treatment NAVAJO & APACHE COUNTIES Arizona Center for Rural Health • Sonoran Prevention Works August 2018 Natural San Juan Enterprise Dixie National Kanarraville Bridges NM Forest National Henrieville Glen New Harmony Bryce Forest Canyon Canyon White Mesa Alton National Park NRA Halls Crossing HovenweepColorad NM o Cortez White River Pahranagat NationalNevada Utah Wildlife Zion Glendale Bluff Montezuma Creek Refuge Toquerville National Mesa La Verkin Orderville Tselakai Dezza Aneth Towaoc Verde Leeds Park National Park Paiute Mexican Hat Ivins Virgin Springdale Reser Hurricane Lake Santa Clara Rockville Powell Ute Mountain Washington Halchita Rainbow Reservation Bridge NM St. George Kanab Big Water Hildale Navajo Mountain Are you or a loved one worried about substance use, like drugs Oljato-Monument Valley Red Mesa Colorado City Fredonia Kaibab Reser Teec Nos Pos Kaibab Beclabito and alcohol? Health, recovery, and wellness are possible, even if Page Lechee Shiprock Desert National Mesquite Moapa Town Wildlife Range Virgin Dennehotso Nellis River AFB Rock Point it is a bumpy journey. A person with substance use issues may Bunkerville Navajo NM Kayenta Moapa Valley Kaibab National Bitter Springs Kaibito need different types of support. This resource guide has county- Moapa Forest River Reser Shonto Chilchinbito Round Rock Sanostee specific options to meet those needs. Recovery from substance Chaco Rough Rock River Chinle Wash Lukachukai North Las Vegas Navajo Reservation Many Farms Newcomb use can look like harm reduction. Some examples include Tonalea Tsaile Colorado River Nellis AFB Supai Las Vegas Grand Canyon avoiding infectious disease and overdose, enrolling in medication Sheep Springs Spring Valley Sunrise Manor Lake Mead Havasupai Paradise National Park Reservation Tuba City Chinle Whitney Pinon Lake Mead Naschitti National Recreation Area Moenkopi Grand Canyon Village Coconino Canyon assisted treatment, reunifying with family and friends, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency
    Eric Rich Senior Hydrologist Navajo Nation EPA Water Quality/NPDES Program Tuba City Office 928-283-3080 Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Water Quality Standards and Water Quality Sampling Watershed Name 2 digit code 8-digit HUC Chinle Wash 01 14080204 Lower San Juan - Four Corners 02 14080201 Montezuma Creek 03 14080203 McElmo Creek 04 14080202 Arroyo Chico 05 13020205 Chaco Wash 06 14080106 Mancos River 07 14080107 Upper San Juan River 08 14080101 Blanco Canyon 09 14080103 Middle San Juan River 10 14080105 Rio Puerco 11 13020204 Rio San Jose 12 13020207 Rio Salado 13 13020209 Zuni River 14 15020004 Upper Puerco River 15 15020006 Lower Puerco River 16 15020007 Leroux Wash 17 15020009 Cottonwood Wash 18 15020011 Middle Little Colorado River 19 15020008 Jeddito Wash 20 15020014 Polacca Wash 21 15020013 Canyon Diablo 22 15020015 Corn-Oraibi Wash 23 15020012 Dinnebito Wash 24 15020017 Lower Little Colorado River 25 15020016 Moenkopi Wash 26 15020018 Lower Colorado - Marble Canyon 27 15010001 Lower Lake Powell 28 14070006 Lower San Juan River 29 14080205 North Plains 30 13020206 Upper Little Colorado River 31 15020002 Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards • USEPA program delegation received in January • Antidegradation • Narrative Standards • Designated Uses (Dom, FC, HC, AgWS, AqHbt, L&W) • Numeric Standards • Biological Standards (Reserved) Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards • Provides basis for 401 Certifications and NPDES Permits • Provides numeric criteria to determine designated use support Sample Design
    [Show full text]
  • Section VII Potential Linkage Zones SECTION VII POTENTIAL LINKAGE ZONES
    2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 41 Section VII Potential Linkage Zones SECTION VII POTENTIAL LINKAGE ZONES Linkage 1 Linkage 2 Beaver Dam Slope – Virgin Slope Beaver Dam – Virgin Mountains Mohave Desert Ecoregion Mohave Desert Ecoregion County: Mohave (Linkage 1: Identified Species continued) County: Mohave Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis ADOT Engineering District: Flagstaff and Kingman Mohave Desert Tortoise Gopherus agassizii ADOT Engineering District: Flagstaff ADOT Maintenance: Fredonia and Kingman Mountain Lion Felis concolor ADOT Maintenance: Fredonia ADOT Natural Resources Management Section: Flagstaff Mule Deer Odocoileus hemionus ADOT Natural Resources Management Section: Flagstaff Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus Spotted Bat Euderma maculatum AGFD: Region II AGFD: Region II Virgin Chub Gila seminuda Virgin Spinedace Lepidomeda mollispinis mollispinis BLM: Arizona Strip District Woundfin Plagopterus argentissimus BLM: Arizona Strip District Congressional District: 2 Threats: Congressional District: 2 Highway (I 15) Council of Government: Western Arizona Council of Governments Urbanization Council of Government: Western Arizona Council of Governments FHWA Engineering: A2 and A4 Hydrology: FHWA Engineering: A2 Big Bend Wash Legislative District: 3 Coon Creek Legislative District: 3 Virgin River Biotic Communities (Vegetation Types): Biotic Communities (Vegetation Types): Mohave Desertscrub 100% Mohave Desertscrub 100% Land Ownership: Land Ownership: Bureau of Land Management 59% Bureau of Land Management 93% Private 27% Private
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Southeastern Portion of the Navajo Reservation
    An archaeological reconnaissance of the southeastern portion of the Navajo reservation Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Lee, Thomas A. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 14:01:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551860 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE OF THE SOUTHEASTERN PORTION OF THE NAVAJO RESERVATION by Thomas A. Lee, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 6 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library, Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made* Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: I APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: Assistant Professor of Anthropology PREFACE The basis for this thesis was a program of archaeological reconnaissance formulated by Dr.
    [Show full text]