3.0 Affected Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3.0 Affected Environment 3.0 Affected Environment 3.1 Geologic Setting 3.1.1 Geology The Navajo Nation lies entirely on the Colorado Plateau, and is composed of a variety of geologic features including canyons, mesas, barren badlands, and expansive flatlands (Foos 1999). The Colorado Plateau covers an area of approximately 130,000 square miles, covering western Colorado, northwestern New Mexico, southeastern Utah, and the northern Arizona. Land surface elevations within this area can range from 5,100 feet above sea level on the western side to over 10,000 feet within some of the mountain ranges found within the project area. The region is rich with geologic history through plateau uplift, deposition, and hydrologic erosion, giving rise to the unique features and landscape of the Southwestern United States. Specifically, the Navajo Nation lies mainly on the Navajo Section of the Colorado Plateau, with some territory on the Grand Canyon and Datil Sections (Rigby 1977). Major geological formations found on the Navajo Nation include the Chuska and Carizzo Mountains, Defiance Plateau, and the San Juan Basin in the eastern portion of the region (Figure 3-1). The Chuska Mountains and the Defiance Plateau are part of the same monocline region, separated by the Black Creek Valley. The uplift is formed from volcanic and sedimentary rocks with geologic layers ranging from the DeChelly Sandstone through the Chuska Sandstone formations with Defiance Plateau lying between 7000 to 8000 ft in elevation and the Chuska Mountains reaching over 10,000 ft in elevation (Harshbarger and Repenning 1954, Peirce et al. 1979). The San Juan Basin located near Farmington is a major coal source thanks to the prominent Fruitland Formation that borders the outlying portions of basin (Fassett 2000). In the western portion, Marble Canyon and Echo Cliffs run down from Navajo Nation border with the Grand Canyon. Marble Canyon and Echo Cliffs run along a tributary of the Colorado River from Lee’s Ferry to the Little Colorado River. The canyon is a prominent monocline, exposing cliffs from the Moenkopi and Chinle Formations. Black Mesa, a prominent mesa in the northern center of the region, rises over 8000 ft in elevation as a Cretaceous island formed from folded geologic layers and topped with soils derived from geologic layers ranging from the Dakota formation to Mesaverde sandstone (Nations et al. 2000). In the north, Navajo Mountain is a prominent laccolith, formed from igneous rock intruding into sedimentary substrate layers towering over 10,000ft in elevation. Shiprock, a prominent monadnock located near the town of the same name, is part of a field of the Chuska Volcanic Field, which is collection of similar geologic features that remain from an ancient volcano that previously existed in the area (Crumpler 2015). 65 Figure 3-1. Map of bedrock geology for the Navajo Nation. Geologic layers are based on the King and Beikman map for the United States (1974) with modifications to labeling nomenclature to reflect regional stratigraphic layers and group names per USGS mapping efforts 66 The Navajo Nation is rich with geologic history, allowing geologists to view and study a variety of geologic layers and events that helped shaped this unique landscape (Figure 3-2). Bedrock layers for the region can range from Pre-Cambrian gneiss to Quaternary alluvium. Prominent formations within this layer include the Supai formation, Coconino Sandstone, and Kaibab Limestone. Mesozoic rock layers were formed mostly through depositional inputs over time and are mostly composed of sandstone and shale. Key formations within this group of geologic layers include the Moenkopi Formation, the Chinle Formation, the Kayenta Formation, Navajo Sandstone, and the Mesaverde group. Cenozoic rock layers are formed from igneous intrusion, volcanic rock, and gravel. Finally, many portions of the Navajo Nation have significant cover from quaternary deposits, including eolian sand dunes and alluvial deposits (Figure 3-3). Surface geology on the Navajo Nation is also important for understanding the geologic history of the area as well as the vegetation communities and species that are currently present. These components are where much of the existing soils are derived and can provide information on major forces that help shape the landscape of the Navajo Nation today. Much of the region is covered with broad alluvial valleys, where rivers and waterways carried fine grained sediments during the Holocene, which are most apparent near the Colorado and Little Colorado River Valleys, the Black Mesa region, San Juan Basin, and Chaco Canyon (Andrews 1991). While alluvium deposition is still a major source for sedimentation and soil genesis near streams, rivers, and washes, nearly a third of the Navajo Nation is covered with eolian sand, or wind distributed sediments (Muhs and Been 2004, Redsteer et al. 2010). Recent changes in climate have caused drier conditions resulting in decreased vegetative cover and an increase in the transport of eolian sand dunes within the region, facilitating dune formation and migration within the region. Additionally, these changes further encourage the replacement of perennial grasses with annual species, such as Russian thistle, which only provide temporary stabilization of eolian deposits and soils, contributing to increasing dust storms and loss of top soil on the Navajo Nation (Draut et al. 2012). 3.1.2 Mineral Resources Due to the unique geologic setting of the Navajo Nation, the area has several mineral resources that have been mined and extracted within the area. Mineral deposits are highly linked to the varying geologic layers found within the Navajo Nation. The development of different extraction industries for mineral resources has been rife with controversy on the Navajo Nation, much of it from the results of environmental and public health impacts to surrounding communities. 67 Figure 3-2. A stratigraphic chart of major geologic layers that can occur on the Navajo Nation, with younger layers at the top and older layers at the bottom. This chart is not scaled to for geologic time and the presence of different geologic layers varies across the region. Numbers on the chart denote layers where resources such as 1uranium, 2coal, 3oil, and 4methane can potentially exist. Colors correspond with the geologic bedrock layers described in Figure 3-1. 68 Figure 3-3. Surficial geology of the Navajo Nation as developed by the Southwestern Regional Gap Analysis Project (USGS 2005). Surficial data was compiled from geologic maps from Arizona (Hirschberg and Pitts 2000), New Mexico (Green and Jones 1997), and Utah (Ramsey 1996) to develop a generalized map for the region. 69 The most famous and controversial of mineral industries was the uranium mining that occurred on the Navajo Nation from the 1940’s through the mid-1980’s. Sandstone deposits, such as the Shinarump member of the Morrison, Chinle, and Moenkopi Formations, are the geologic layers where uranium is most abundant in the Navajo Nation (Repenning et al. 1969, Chenoweth 1993, Billingsley et al. 2007, TerraSpectra Geomatics 2007). In the 1940’s the discovery of uranium deposits in the region and the threat of the Cold War, led to the widespread establishment of uranium mining operations. While mining operations slowed around the mid-1960s and stopped altogether in the mid 1980’s, the remains of hundreds of abandoned mines and mine waste has left major impacts on the Navajo people, leaving many communities and workers to deal with the impacts of increased radiation exposure and illness (USEPA 2013). As a result of such actions, the Navajo Nation passed a legal ban on uranium mining through the Diné Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005 (18 N.N.C. §1301) Uranium mining occurred across the Navajo Nation in six areas, which have been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) as abandoned uranium mine regions where mining operations were concentrated (Figure 3-4). While similarly named, these mining regions are not related to the Navajo Agencies. On the Western Abandoned Uranium Mining Region, major mining was concentrated in Cameron, although mining operations occurred from Bitter Springs in the North to Grand Falls in the south and as far east as Ward Terrace. The Morale Mine in the Hopi Buttes was the only productive mine in operation in the Southern Abandoned Uranium Mining region. The Central Abandoned Uranium Mining Region had several mines on the east side of Black Mesa, with a few located near Rough Rock. In the North-Central Abandoned Uranium Mining Region, mining occurred in Monument Valley along the Arizona-Utah border with the Whirlwind mine on the San Juan River. For the Northern AUM Region, mining operations were conducted around the Carrizo Mountains with a few straddling the Arizona-New Mexico border and the Cove Mesa mine located further south near the Lukachukai Mountains. In New Mexico, a few mines in the region were also in the Sanostee region. The Eastern Abandoned Uranium Mining Region saw mining operations in the productive Grants Uranium District, stretching from Church Rock in the west to Ambrosia Lake in the east (USEPA 2013). To date, the U.S. EPA has identified over 500 different abandoned mine locations on the Navajo Nation (USEPA 2013). Clean-up efforts are coordinated and implemented in the region by the U.S. EPA, the Navajo Nation EPA Superfund Program, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with additional funding provided by Anadarko Petroleum and Kerr-McGee Corporation as the result of Department of Justice settlement in 2014 (USEPA 2013, USDOJ 2014). However, the recent increase in demand for uranium oversees has increased pressure on the Navajo Nation to permit uranium mining once again. Several mining companies have purchased mining rights to lands and rights-of-way located on the Navajo Nation and have been seeking approval to conduct mining operations in the area.
Recommended publications
  • Narbonapass.Pdf
    FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG 1 FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG, FROM GALLUP TO GAMERCO, YAH-TA-HEY, WINDOW ROCK, FORT DEFIANCE, NAVAJO, TODILTO PARK, CRYSTAL, NARBONA PASS, SHEEP SPRINGS, TOHATCHI AND GALLUP SPENCER G. LUCAS, STEVEN C. SEMKEN, ANDREW B. HECKERT, WILLIAM R. BERGLOF, First-day Road Log GRETCHEN HOFFMAN, BARRY S. KUES, LARRY S. CRUMPLER AND JAYNE C. AUBELE ������ ������ ������ ������� ������ ������ ������ ������ �������� Distance: 141.8 miles ������� Stops: 5 ���� ������ ������ SUMMARY ������ �� ������ �� ����� �� The first day’s trip takes us around the southern �� �� flank of the Defiance uplift, back over it into the �� southwestern San Juan Basin and ends at the Hogback monocline at Gallup. The trip emphasizes Mesozoic— especially Jurassic—stratigraphy and sedimentation in NOTE: Most of this day’s trip will be conducted the Defiance uplift region. We also closely examine within the boundaries of the Navajo (Diné) Nation under Cenozoic volcanism of the Navajo volcanic field. a permit from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department. Stop 1 at Window Rock discusses the Laramide Persons wishing to conduct geological investigations Defiance uplift and introduces Jurassic eolianites near on the Navajo Nation, including stops described in this the preserved southern edge of the Middle-Upper guidebook, must first apply for and receive a permit Jurassic depositional basin. At Todilto Park, Stop 2, from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department, P.O. we examine the type area of the Jurassic Todilto For- Box 1910, Window Rock, Arizona, 86515, 928-871- mation and discuss Todilto deposition and economic 6587. Sample collection on Navajo land is forbidden. geology, a recurrent theme of this field conference. From Todilto Park we move on to the Green Knobs diatreme adjacent to the highway for Stop 3, and then to Stop 4 at the Narbona Pass maar at the crest of the Chuska Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Monument Valley Meander
    RV Traveler's Roadmap to Monument Valley Meander However you experience it, the valley is a wonder to behold, a harsh yet hauntingly beautiful landscape. View it in early morning, when shadows lift from rocky marvels. Admire it in springtime,when tiny pink and blue wildflowers sprinkle the land with jewel-like specks of color. Try to see it through the eyes of the Navajos, who still herd their sheep and weave their rugs here. 1 Highlights & Facts For The Ideal Experience Agathla Peak Trip Length: Roughly 260 miles, plus side trips Best Time To Go: Spring - autumn What To Watch Out For: When on Indian reservations abide by local customs. Ask permission before taking photos, never disturb any of the artifacts. Must See Nearby Attractions: Grand Canyon National Park (near Flagstaff, AZ) Petrified Forest National Park (near Holbrook, AZ) Zion National Park (Springdale, UT) 2 Traveler's Notes Monument Valley Navajo Tribal Park The stretch of Rte. 163 called the Trail of the Ancients in honor of the vanished Anasazis cuts across Monument Valley at the Utah border on its way to the little town of Mexican Hat. Named for a rock formation there that resembles an upside-down sombrero a whimsical footnote to the magnificence of Monument Valley—Mexican Hat is the nearest settlement to Goosenecks State Park, just ahead and to the west via Rtes. 261 and 316. The monuments in the park have descriptive names. They are based on ones imagination. These names were created by the early settlers of Monument Valley. Others names portray a certain meaning to the Navajo people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uranium Deposits of Northeastern Arizona William L
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/24 The uranium deposits of northeastern Arizona William L. Chenoweth and Roger C. Malan, 1973, pp. 139-149 in: Monument Valley (Arizona, Utah and New Mexico), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 24th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 232 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1973 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS
    2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization 1 Urban and Community Forestry 2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS Planning Maps for the Department of Forestry and Fire Management 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas About the 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas This collection of maps summarizes the results of the 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization analysis of the Urban and Community Forestry Program (UCF) at the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management (DFFM). The purpose of the analysis was to assess existing urban forests in Arizona’s communities and identify shade tree planting needs. The spatial analysis, based on U.S. Census Block Group polygons, generated seven sub-indices for criteria identified by an expert panel: population density, lack of canopy cover, low-income, traffic proximity, sustainability, air quality, and urban heat effect. The seven sub-indices were combined into one Shade Tree Planting Priority Index and further summarized into a Shade Tree Planting Priority Ranking. The resulting reports, maps, and GIS data provide compiled information that can be easily used for identifying areas for strategic shade tree planting within a community or across Arizona’s major cities and towns. These maps provide limited detail for conveying the scale and depth of the analysis results which – for more detailed use – are best explored through the analysis report, interactive maps, and the GIS data available through the UCF Program webpage at https://forestryandfire.az.gov/forestry-community-forestry/urban-community-forestry/projects. Note: At the time of publication, two known analysis area errors have been identified. A few of Safford’s incorporated easements were not captured correctly.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2009-1269, Appendix 1
    Appendix 1. Summary of location, basin, and hydrological-regime characteristics for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations in Arizona and parts of adjacent states that were used to calibrate hydrological-regime models [Hydrologic provinces: 1, Plateau Uplands; 2, Central Highlands; 3, Basin and Range Lowlands; e, value not present in database and was estimated for the purpose of model development] Average percent of Latitude, Longitude, Site Complete Number of Percent of year with Hydrologic decimal decimal Hydrologic altitude, Drainage area, years of perennial years no flow, Identifier Name unit code degrees degrees province feet square miles record years perennial 1950-2005 09379050 LUKACHUKAI CREEK NEAR 14080204 36.47750 109.35010 1 5,750 160e 5 1 20% 2% LUKACHUKAI, AZ 09379180 LAGUNA CREEK AT DENNEHOTSO, 14080204 36.85389 109.84595 1 4,985 414.0 9 0 0% 39% AZ 09379200 CHINLE CREEK NEAR MEXICAN 14080204 36.94389 109.71067 1 4,720 3,650.0 41 0 0% 15% WATER, AZ 09382000 PARIA RIVER AT LEES FERRY, AZ 14070007 36.87221 111.59461 1 3,124 1,410.0 56 56 100% 0% 09383200 LEE VALLEY CR AB LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.50204 1 9,440e 1.3 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383220 LEE VALLEY CREEK TRIBUTARY 15020001 33.93894 109.50204 1 9,440e 0.5 6 0 0% 49% NEAR GREER, ARIZ. 09383250 LEE VALLEY CR BL LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.49787 1 9,400e 1.9 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383400 LITTLE COLORADO RIVER AT GREER, 15020001 34.01671 109.45731 1 8,283 29.1 22 22 100% 0% ARIZ.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the Chinle Wash Watershed, Navajo Nation Arizona, Utah and New Mexico
    Hydrogeology of the Chinle Wash Watershed, Navajo Nation Arizona, Utah and New Mexico Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Roessel, Raymond J. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 19:50:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191379 HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE CHINLE WASH WATERSHED, NAVAJO NATION, ARIZONA, UTAH AND NEW MEXICO by Raymond J. Roessel A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN HYDROLOGY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1994 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • MS4 Route Mapping PRIORITIZATION PARAMETERS
    MS4 Route Mapping PRIORITIZATION PARAMETERS Approx. ADOT Named or Average Annual Length Year Age OAW/Impaired/ Not‐ Within 1/4 Pollutants ADOT Designated Pollutants Route ADOT Districts Annual Traffic Receiving Waters TMDL? Given Precipitation (mi) Installed (yrs) Attaining Waters? Mile? (per EPA) Pollutant? Uses (per EPA) (Vehicles/yr) WLA? (inches) SR 24 (802) 1.0 2014 5 Central 11,513,195 Queen Creek N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6 SR 51 16.7 1987 32 Central 61,081,655 Salt River N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6 SR 61 76.51 1935 84 Northeast 775,260 Little Colorado River Y (Not attaining) N E. Coli N FBC Y E. Coli N 7 Sediment Y A&Wc Y Sediment N SR 64 108.31 1932 87 Northcentral 2,938,250 Colorado River Y (Impaired) N Sediment Y A&Wc N ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.5 Selenium Y A&Wc N ‐‐ ‐‐ SR 66 66.59 1984 35 Northwest 5,154,530 Truxton Wash N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7 SR 67 43.4 1941 78 Northcentral 39,055 House Rock Wash N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 17 Kanab Creek N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ SR 68 27.88 1941 78 Northwest 5,557,490 Colorado River Y (Impaired) Y Temperature N A&Ww N ‐‐ ‐‐ 6 SR 69 33.87 1938 81 Northwest 17,037,470 Granite Creek Y (Not attaining) Y E. Coli N A&Wc, FBC, FC, AgI, AgL Y E. Coli Y 9.5 Watson Lake Y (Not attaining) Y TN Y ‐‐ Y TN Y DO N A&Ww Y DO Y pH N A&Ww, FBC, AgI, AgL Y pH Y TP Y ‐‐ Y TP Y SR 71 24.16 1936 83 Northwest 296,015 Sols Wash/Hassayampa River Y (Impaired, Not attaining) Y E.
    [Show full text]
  • Index 1 INDEX
    Index 1 INDEX A Blue Spring 76, 106, 110, 115 Bluff Spring Trail 184 Adeii Eechii Cliffs 124 Blythe 198 Agate House 140 Blythe Intaglios 199 Agathla Peak 256 Bonita Canyon Drive 221 Agua Fria Nat'l Monument 175 Booger Canyon 194 Ajo 203 Boundary Butte 299 Ajo Mountain Loop 204 Box Canyon 132 Alamo Canyon 205 Box (The) 51 Alamo Lake SP 201 Boyce-Thompson Arboretum 190 Alstrom Point 266, 302 Boynton Canyon 149, 161 Anasazi Bridge 73 Boy Scout Canyon 197 Anasazi Canyon 302 Bright Angel Canyon 25, 51 Anderson Dam 216 Bright Angel Point 15, 25 Angels Window 27 Bright Angel Trail 42, 46, 49, 61, 80, 90 Antelope Canyon 280, 297 Brins Mesa 160 Antelope House 231 Brins Mesa Trail 161 Antelope Point Marina 294, 297 Broken Arrow Trail 155 Apache Junction 184 Buck Farm Canyon 73 Apache Lake 187 Buck Farm Overlook 34, 73, 103 Apache-Sitgreaves Nat'l Forest 167 Buckskin Gulch Confluence 275 Apache Trail 187, 188 Buenos Aires Nat'l Wildlife Refuge 226 Aravaipa Canyon 192 Bulldog Cliffs 186 Aravaipa East trailhead 193 Bullfrog Marina 302 Arch Rock 366 Bull Pen 170 Arizona Canyon Hot Springs 197 Bush Head Canyon 278 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 216 Arizona Trail 167 C Artist's Point 250 Aspen Forest Overlook 257 Cabeza Prieta 206 Atlatl Rock 366 Cactus Forest Drive 218 Call of the Canyon 158 B Calloway Trail 171, 203 Cameron Visitor Center 114 Baboquivari Peak 226 Camp Verde 170 Baby Bell Rock 157 Canada Goose Drive 198 Baby Rocks 256 Canyon del Muerto 231 Badger Creek 72 Canyon X 290 Bajada Loop Drive 216 Cape Final 28 Bar-10-Ranch 19 Cape Royal 27 Barrio
    [Show full text]
  • Tse' Nikani Draft Corridor Management
    Tse'nikani Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan DRAFT August 2013 Introduction Purpose Tse’nikani Scenic Byway was established The purpose of a byway corridor as an Arizona Byway in 2005 and given the management plan is not to create more name Tse’nikani ‘Flat Mesa Rock’ Scenic regulations or taxes. Rather, a corridor Byway. management plan documents the goals, strategies, and responsibilities for preserving and enhancing the byway’s most Byway Description valuable qualities. Promoting tourism can Tse’nikani Scenic Byway, U.S. Highway be one target, but so are issues of safety or (US) 191 is located in northeast Arizona preserving historic or cultural structures. in Apache County and entirely within the 160 The Corridor Management Plan can: Navajo Nation. The portion of US 191 that 1 160 Tse’nikani is a designated Arizona Scenic Byway is Scenic Road ◊ document community interest from Milepost (MP) 467.0, south of Many ◊ document existing conditions and Farms, to MP 510.4, at the junction with history US 160, near Mexican Water. The highway ◊ guide enhancement and safety is the primary route to access Canyon de improvement projects ARIZONA Chelly National Monument, about 13 miles mexico new south of the south end of the byway. ◊ promote partnerships for conservation Chinle and enhancement activities US 191 is a two-lane asphalt paved road for ◊ suggest resources for project development almost its entire length with no median and programs and few left-turn lanes. The roadway is ◊ promote coordination between residents, managed by the Arizona Department communities, and agencies of Transportation (ADOT) through the 264 Ganado ◊ support application for National Scenic Navajo Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Eimeria Sciurorum (Apicomplexa, Coccidia) from the Calabrian Black Squirrel (Sciurus Meridionalis): an Example of Lower Host Specificity of Eimerians
    BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT published: 28 July 2020 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00369 Eimeria sciurorum (Apicomplexa, Coccidia) From the Calabrian Black Squirrel (Sciurus meridionalis): An Example of Lower Host Specificity of Eimerians Jana Kvicerova 1*, Lada Hofmannova 2, Francesca Scognamiglio 3 and Mario Santoro 4 1 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceskéˇ Budejovice,ˇ Czechia, 2 Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czechia, 3 Department of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, Italy, 4 Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy Edited by: Arvo Viltrop, Host specificity plays one of the key roles in parasitism. It affects the evolution and Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia diversification of both host and parasite, as well as it influences their geographical Reviewed by: distribution, and epidemiological significance. For most of parasites, however, host Phoebe Chapman, specificity is unknown or misrepresented because it is difficult to be determined The University of accurately. Here we provide the information about the lower host specificity of Eimeria Queensland, Australia Colin James McInnes, sciurorum infecting squirrels, and its new host record for the Calabrian black squirrel Moredun Research Institute, Sciurus meridionalis, a southern Italian endemic species. United Kingdom *Correspondence: Keywords: squirrels, coccidia, host specificity, endemic species, parasite dispersal, southern Italy Jana Kvicerova [email protected] INTRODUCTION Specialty section: This article was submitted to The host specificity of a parasite—the degree to which the parasite is adapted to its host/s, and the Zoological Medicine, number of host species that can successfully be used by the parasite—is the result of a long-term a section of the journal adaptation process undergone by both the host and the parasite (1, 2).
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS BOOK Proof 03
    1st – 15th December ! 1st International Meeting of Early-stage Researchers in Paleontology / XIV Encuentro de Jóvenes Investigadores en Paleontología st (1December IMERP 1-stXIV-15th EJIP), 2018 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Palaeontology in the virtual era 4 1st – 15th December ! Ist Palaeontological Virtual Congress. Book of abstracts. Palaeontology in a virtual era. From an original idea of Vicente D. Crespo. Published by Vicente D. Crespo, Esther Manzanares, Rafael Marquina-Blasco, Maite Suñer, José Luis Herráiz, Arturo Gamonal, Fernando Antonio M. Arnal, Humberto G. Ferrón, Francesc Gascó and Carlos Martínez-Pérez. Layout: Maite Suñer. Conference logo: Hugo Salais. ISBN: 978-84-09-07386-3 5 1st – 15th December ! Palaeontology in the virtual era BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 6 4 PRESENTATION The 1st Palaeontological Virtual Congress (1st PVC) is just the natural consequence of the evolution of our surrounding world, with the emergence of new technologies that allow a wide range of communication possibilities. Within this context, the 1st PVC represents the frst attempt in palaeontology to take advantage of these new possibilites being the frst international palaeontology congress developed in a virtual environment. This online congress is pioneer in palaeontology, offering an exclusively virtual-developed environment to researchers all around the globe. The simplicity of this new format, giving international projection to the palaeontological research carried out by groups with limited economic resources (expensive registration fees, travel, accomodation and maintenance expenses), is one of our main achievements. This new format combines the benefts of traditional meetings (i.e., providing a forum for discussion, including guest lectures, feld trips or the production of an abstract book) with the advantages of the online platforms, which allow to reach a high number of researchers along the world, promoting the participation of palaeontologists from developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • (NTUA) – Navajo Townsite NPDES Permit No
    December 2011 FACT SHEET Authorization to Discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority (NTUA) – Navajo Townsite NPDES Permit No. NN0030335 Applicant address: Navajo Tribal Utility Authority (“NTUA”) P.O. Box 587 Fort Defiance, Arizona 86504 Applicant Contact: Harry L. Begaye, Technical Assistant (928) 729-6208 Facility Address: 0.5 miles west of Navajo Pine High School West of Black Creek Wash in Navajo, NM Facility Contact: Philemon Allison, District Manager (928) 729-6140 I. Summary The NTUA was issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit (No. NN0030335) on December 23, 2006, for its Navajo Townsite wastewater treatment lagoon facility (“WWTF”), pursuant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) regulations set forth in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Part 122.21. The permit was effective December 23, 2006, through midnight, December 22, 2011. NTUA applied to U.S. EPA Region 9 for reissuance on August 16, 2011. This fact sheet is based on information provided by the applicant through its application and discharge data submittal, along with the appropriate laws and regulations. Pursuant to Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), the U.S. EPA is proposing issuance of the NPDES permit renewal to NTUA Navajo Townsite (“permittee”) for the discharge of treated domestic wastewater to receiving waters named Black Creek, a tributary to Puerco River, an eventual tributary to the Little Colorado River, a water of the United States. II. Description of Facility The NTUA Navajo Townsite wastewater treatment lagoons are located 0.5 miles west of Navajo Pine High School, west of Black Creek Wash in Navajo New Mexico.
    [Show full text]