River Flowing from the Sunrise: an Environmental History of the Lower San Juan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

River Flowing from the Sunrise: an Environmental History of the Lower San Juan Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2000 River Flowing from the Sunrise: An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan James M. Aton Robert S. McPherson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Recommended Citation Aton, James M. and McPherson, Robert S., "River Flowing from the Sunrise: An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan" (2000). All USU Press Publications. 128. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/128 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. River Flowing from the Sunrise An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan A. R. Raplee’s camp on the San Juan in 1893 and 1894. (Charles Goodman photo, Manuscripts Division, Marriott Library, University of Utah) River Flowing from the Sunrise An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan James M. Aton Robert S. McPherson Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright © 2000 Utah State University Press all rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800 Manfactured in the United States of America Printed on acid-free paper 654321 000102030405 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Aton, James M., 1949– River flowing from the sunrise : an environmental history of the lower San Juan / James M. Aton, Robert S. McPherson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-87421-404-1 (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-87421-403-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Nature—Effect of human beings on—San Juan River Valley (Colo.-Utah) 2. Human ecology—San Juan River Valley (Colo.-Utah)—History. 3. San Juan River Valley (Colo.-Utah)—Environmental condi- tions. I McPherson, Robert S., 1947– II. Title. GF504.S35 A76 2000 304.2'09762'59—dc21 00-010229 For Jennifer, My daughter and fellow traveller on the river of life —JMA And to Betsy and the children —RSM Contents Foreword A River in Time xi Donald Worster Acknowledgments xiii Introduction Twelve Millennia on the San Juan 1 Chapter I Prehistory: From Clovis Hunters to Corn Farmers 13 Chapter II Navajos, Paiutes, and Utes: Views of a Sacred Land 29 Chapter III Exploration and Science: Defining Terra Incognita 42 Chapter IV Livestock: Cows, Feed, and Floods 65 Chapter V Agriculture: Ditches, Droughts, and Disasters 84 Chapter VI City Building: Farming the Triad 99 Chapter VII Mining: Black and Yellow Gold in Redrock Country 113 Chapter VIII The Federal Government: Dams, Tamarisk, and 129 Pikeminnows Chapter IX San Juan of the Imagination: Local and 150 National Values Epilogue Visions: Flowing from the Sunrise or a Water Spigot? 167 Notes 172 Bibliography 198 Index 212 Illustrations Map of San Juan River basin xiv, xv De Miera map from the Domínguez-Escalante Expedition 44 Boys show off a Colorado pikeminnow 2 Beaver dam at Butler Wash 47 Honaker Trail section of the San Juan 4 Dr. John S. Newberry 49 Alluvial plains between Four Corners and Chinle Wash 4 Alice Eastwood 52 The Goosenecks 5 The San Juan’s famous sand waves 54 The 1921 Trimble Expedition 6 Byron Cummings and Rainbow Bridge expedition 55 Navajo and Glen Canyon Dams 8, 9 Herbert E. Gregory 56 The Monument Upwarp at Lime Ridge and Chinle Wash 11 Emery L. Goodridge’s inscription near Mexican Hat 57 Lime Ridge 12 Hugh D. Miser of the 1921 Indian ricegrass 14 Trimble Expedition 59 The Moab mastodon 15 Hugh Hyde and Robert Allen of the Clovis camp site on Lime Ridge 16 Trimble Expedition 60 River House Ruin 21 Angus Woodbury 61 Anasazi check dam at Hovenweep 22, 23 Jesse Jennings 62 Beaver Creek Anasazi C. Gregory Crampton and Glen Canyon irrigation ditch 24 Survey team 63 The Kachina Panel at the mouth of Sheep near Mexican Hat 66 Butler Wash 27 Al Scorup, 68 Ute petroglyph along the San Juan River 30 Arthur Spencer and his trading post 69 Southern Ute tepee 31 Remains of the water wheel system at the Comb Wash 32 Hyde-Barton Trading Post 71 Abandoned hogan at the mouth The Aneth Trading Post 72 of Chinle Creek 35 The San Juan Co-op 74 Navajo men at the Bluff Co-op 37 The Navajo Faith Mission 75 Rainbow Bridge 40 Howard Ray Antes, “Mister Sunday” 77 Abandoned Colorado-Utah road near the The Atwood Mining Camp and boats 121 mouth of McElmo Creek 78 Oil gusher at the Goodridge Well 122 Sheep on the Mexican Hat Bridge 79 Miners near the San Juan 123 Navajos with livestock 82 Navajo protestors at the Aneth Oil Field 126 Jim Joe and his family 85 A.C. Honaker clears a path to his Navajo man and corn 86 San Juan trading post 128 L. H. Redd family and H. D. Harshberger Navajo Dam 133 at cornfield 87 The Bluff dam site 134 Flooded cornfield 89 The river near Aneth 138 Wagon next to a bell-shaped hole used The San Juan at the confluence with for storing produce 91 Chinle Wash 140, 141 The Aneth Government Station 93 Norman Nevills and customers 143 Herbert Redshaw 94 River runners on the San Juan 144 Horse-driven irrigation pump at Florence Barnes and a pikeminnow 146 the Honaker camp 97 Oil well at Aneth 147 Bluff landscape 100 Albert R. Lyman 152 The early home of the Wayne H. Redd family in Bluff 101 First photo of the Goosenecks of the San Juan 154 Church, school, dance hall and public meeting building 103 William Jackson photo of the San Juan 155 Floodplain, 105 Norman Nevills 156 The old Swing Tree 108 Wallace Stegner 158 Riprap barrier in Bluff 110 Tony Hillerman visits Walter E. Mendenhall’s camp 161 Placer miners in San Juan Canyon 114 E.L. Goodridge’s first oil well 162 Gold mining at “Dempsey’s claim” 115 A.R. Raplee’s camp 163 Sluice box and waterwheel at the foot of Mexican Hat Rock 117 Ellen Meloy 164 Two sections of the Honaker Trail 119 Glen Canyon Dam 168 Flat-bottomed boats 120 Foreword A River in Time Donald Worster t. John the Divine ended his Book of forth, with a new clarity and integrity that it has S Revelation with “a pure river of water of life, not had before. They have done this by putting clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of the river at the center of the story and then God and of the Lamb.” On either side of that watching the civilizations come and go. The San river grew the tree of life, bearing all manner of Juan becomes the main character; it is no fruits every month of the year and shiny green longer merely incidental to human endeavors. leaves that could heal all the nations. He would We call this radical new perspective envi- not have liked the San Juan, the river of the ronmental history. It begins with the premise that American Southwest named by Spanish mission- the natural and human worlds are not totally aries in his honor. Only cottonwood and separate but intertwined and interdependent. tamarisk trees grow along its banks. Its water is What nature does affects human beings in the dark with silt and has been polluted by oil. It most profound way; vice versa, what people do flows not from a heavenly throne but from the can influence the patterns and processes of state of Colorado, where gold miners have nature profoundly, especially in the modern sought wealth more than spirituality. Native period, when technology gives us so much more Americans, to be sure, have deeply religious power than we have ever had before. Often that feelings about this river. So do Mormon settlers impact has been felt not only by other species in river towns like Bluff. But they have not lived who share the place but also, through the intri- together in peace; on the contrary, this river has cacies of ecological feedback, by human com- experienced bitter conflict, fierce competition munities as well. Because early Clovis hunters, for its scarce resources, and not a few deaths. In the first people to leave their mark on the place, other words, it has been a real river, not some may have exterminated the local population of phantasm in a dream, and how much more Columbian mammoths, both hunters and hunt- interesting that fact makes it. ed suffered. Later, when the Navajos acquired James Aton and Robert McPherson have sheep from the Spanish, they overgrazed the given us a splendid history of this harshly beau- scanty vegetation and created an environmental tiful place. Heretofore it has been neglected by disaster. The whites who crowded in with their historians and other scholars, though they have large cattle herds during the late nineteenth written a surprising number of books and arti- century have followed an age-old pattern of cles on the various peoples, the colorful individ- land exploitation that likewise has brought seri- uals, who have passed along the river. Aton and ous economic and social problems. If this phe- McPherson have drawn on that literature exten- nomenon of interdependence has been hard sively, while adding prodigious archival research for people to learn, it has seldom entered the of their own. But they have done more than sit apprehension of historians—until the rise of in a library turning over brittle pages from the environmental history, so well exemplified in past. They have experienced this river firsthand. this book. And they have completely reconceptualized the Most dramatically, the river has been a place and its history so that the whole stands powerful force over time.
Recommended publications
  • September 2019 Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale Monticello Field Office DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0003-OTHER NEPA -Mtfo-EA
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management July 2019 September 2019 Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale Monticello Field Office DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0003-OTHER NEPA -MtFO-EA Monticello Field Office 365 North Main PO Box 7 Monticello, UT 84535 DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0003_Other NEPA-MtFO-EA July 2019 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Purpose & Need .................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Project Location and Legal Description ........................................................................................ 4 1.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Decision to be Made ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Plan Conformance Review............................................................................................................ 6 1.7 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, Policies or Other Plans ..................................................... 9 1.8 Issues Identified .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Babcock (1873-1945) 24 by Mike Milligan
    The Dentists’ Sabbatical on the Grand River in 1897 James Edwin Miller (1857-1945) 40 and Oro DeGarmo (O.D.) Babcock (1873-1945) 24 By Mike Milligan In the early years of boating on the Green and Colorado Rivers there tended to be a bit of jealous rivalry among a number of the boaters who made history. They wanted their boating excursions documented according to their perspective, while sometimes questioning the exploits of others. Examples include whether James White truly was the first through the Grand Canyon in 1867? Questions whether the three men who left Major Powell’s expedition in 1869 were cowards or did divisiveness split them up at Separation Rapid in the Grand Canyon? During the 1889 DCC& P Railroad survey did surveyor Frank Clarence Kendrick portage Westwater (Hades/Granite) Canyon out of fear while surveying the Colorado (Grand) River from Grand Junction to the Confluence with the Green River? Their experiences in the Grand Canyon caused a few of the boaters to become Colorado and Green River historians as they diligently gathered as much information while it was fresh from living boaters and other sources for those that they could not locate or who had died. The preeminent historians were Frederick S. Dellenbaugh and Robert Brewster Stanton. Both men were part of two of the earliest boating expeditions down the Grand Canyon. They wrote biographies of documenting their historical voyages that were published.1 There were some controversial opinions regarding each other’s expedition that is noted above. Later, Otis R. “Dock” Marston would assume the role as historian when he took up the mantle and gathered volumes more of data that is commonly used by current authors who write books about the Grand Canyon today.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH by David B. Madsen Common rock art elements of the Fremont and Anasazi on the Colorado Plateau and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. ,I!! CIRCULAR 95 . 1997 I~\' UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ." if;~~ 6EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ISBN 1-55791-605-5 STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison~ Director UGS Board Member Representing Russell C. Babcock, Jr. (chairman) .................................................................................................. Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith ................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ....................................................................................................................... Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ......................................................................................................................... Public-at-Large C. William Berge .............................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ..................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Last and First Men
    LAST AND FIRST MEN A STORY OF THE NEAR AND FAR FUTURE by W. Olaf Stapledon Project Gutenburg PREFACE THIS is a work of fiction. I have tried to invent a story which may seem a possible, or at least not wholly impossible, account of the future of man; and I have tried to make that story relevant to the change that is taking place today in man's outlook. To romance of the future may seem to be indulgence in ungoverned speculation for the sake of the marvellous. Yet controlled imagination in this sphere can be a very valuable exercise for minds bewildered about the present and its potentialities. Today we should welcome, and even study, every serious attempt to envisage the future of our race; not merely in order to grasp the very diverse and often tragic possibilities that confront us, but also that we may familiarize ourselves with the certainty that many of our most cherished ideals would seem puerile to more developed minds. To romance of the far future, then, is to attempt to see the human race in its cosmic setting, and to mould our hearts to entertain new values. But if such imaginative construction of possible futures is to be at all potent, our imagination must be strictly disciplined. We must endeavour not to go beyond the bounds of possibility set by the particular state of culture within which we live. The merely fantastic has only minor power. Not that we should seek actually to prophesy what will as a matter of fact occur; for in our present state such prophecy is certainly futile, save in the simplest matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Icons of Survival: Metahumanism As Planetary Defense." Nerd Ecology: Defending the Earth with Unpopular Culture
    Lioi, Anthony. "Icons of Survival: Metahumanism as Planetary Defense." Nerd Ecology: Defending the Earth with Unpopular Culture. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. 169–196. Environmental Cultures. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 25 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474219730.ch-007>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 25 September 2021, 20:32 UTC. Copyright © Anthony Lioi 2016. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 6 Icons of Survival: Metahumanism as Planetary Defense In which I argue that superhero comics, the most maligned of nerd genres, theorize the transformation of ethics and politics necessary to the project of planetary defense. The figure of the “metahuman,” the human with superpowers and purpose, embodies the transfigured nerd whose defects—intellect, swarm-behavior, abnormality, flux, and love of machines—become virtues of survival in the twenty-first century. The conflict among capitalism, fascism, and communism, which drove the Cold War and its immediate aftermath, also drove the Golden and Silver Ages of Comics. In the era of planetary emergency, these forces reconfigure themselves as different versions of world-destruction. The metahuman also signifies going “beyond” these economic and political systems into orders that preserve democracy without destroying the biosphere. Therefore, the styles of metahuman figuration represent an appeal to tradition and a technique of transformation. I call these strategies the iconic style and metamorphic style. The iconic style, more typical of DC Comics, makes the hero an icon of virtue, and metahuman powers manifest as visible signs: the “S” of Superman, the tiara and golden lasso of Wonder Woman.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS
    2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization 1 Urban and Community Forestry 2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS Planning Maps for the Department of Forestry and Fire Management 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas About the 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas This collection of maps summarizes the results of the 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization analysis of the Urban and Community Forestry Program (UCF) at the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management (DFFM). The purpose of the analysis was to assess existing urban forests in Arizona’s communities and identify shade tree planting needs. The spatial analysis, based on U.S. Census Block Group polygons, generated seven sub-indices for criteria identified by an expert panel: population density, lack of canopy cover, low-income, traffic proximity, sustainability, air quality, and urban heat effect. The seven sub-indices were combined into one Shade Tree Planting Priority Index and further summarized into a Shade Tree Planting Priority Ranking. The resulting reports, maps, and GIS data provide compiled information that can be easily used for identifying areas for strategic shade tree planting within a community or across Arizona’s major cities and towns. These maps provide limited detail for conveying the scale and depth of the analysis results which – for more detailed use – are best explored through the analysis report, interactive maps, and the GIS data available through the UCF Program webpage at https://forestryandfire.az.gov/forestry-community-forestry/urban-community-forestry/projects. Note: At the time of publication, two known analysis area errors have been identified. A few of Safford’s incorporated easements were not captured correctly.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2009-1269, Appendix 1
    Appendix 1. Summary of location, basin, and hydrological-regime characteristics for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations in Arizona and parts of adjacent states that were used to calibrate hydrological-regime models [Hydrologic provinces: 1, Plateau Uplands; 2, Central Highlands; 3, Basin and Range Lowlands; e, value not present in database and was estimated for the purpose of model development] Average percent of Latitude, Longitude, Site Complete Number of Percent of year with Hydrologic decimal decimal Hydrologic altitude, Drainage area, years of perennial years no flow, Identifier Name unit code degrees degrees province feet square miles record years perennial 1950-2005 09379050 LUKACHUKAI CREEK NEAR 14080204 36.47750 109.35010 1 5,750 160e 5 1 20% 2% LUKACHUKAI, AZ 09379180 LAGUNA CREEK AT DENNEHOTSO, 14080204 36.85389 109.84595 1 4,985 414.0 9 0 0% 39% AZ 09379200 CHINLE CREEK NEAR MEXICAN 14080204 36.94389 109.71067 1 4,720 3,650.0 41 0 0% 15% WATER, AZ 09382000 PARIA RIVER AT LEES FERRY, AZ 14070007 36.87221 111.59461 1 3,124 1,410.0 56 56 100% 0% 09383200 LEE VALLEY CR AB LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.50204 1 9,440e 1.3 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383220 LEE VALLEY CREEK TRIBUTARY 15020001 33.93894 109.50204 1 9,440e 0.5 6 0 0% 49% NEAR GREER, ARIZ. 09383250 LEE VALLEY CR BL LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.49787 1 9,400e 1.9 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383400 LITTLE COLORADO RIVER AT GREER, 15020001 34.01671 109.45731 1 8,283 29.1 22 22 100% 0% ARIZ.
    [Show full text]
  • MS4 Route Mapping PRIORITIZATION PARAMETERS
    MS4 Route Mapping PRIORITIZATION PARAMETERS Approx. ADOT Named or Average Annual Length Year Age OAW/Impaired/ Not‐ Within 1/4 Pollutants ADOT Designated Pollutants Route ADOT Districts Annual Traffic Receiving Waters TMDL? Given Precipitation (mi) Installed (yrs) Attaining Waters? Mile? (per EPA) Pollutant? Uses (per EPA) (Vehicles/yr) WLA? (inches) SR 24 (802) 1.0 2014 5 Central 11,513,195 Queen Creek N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6 SR 51 16.7 1987 32 Central 61,081,655 Salt River N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6 SR 61 76.51 1935 84 Northeast 775,260 Little Colorado River Y (Not attaining) N E. Coli N FBC Y E. Coli N 7 Sediment Y A&Wc Y Sediment N SR 64 108.31 1932 87 Northcentral 2,938,250 Colorado River Y (Impaired) N Sediment Y A&Wc N ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.5 Selenium Y A&Wc N ‐‐ ‐‐ SR 66 66.59 1984 35 Northwest 5,154,530 Truxton Wash N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7 SR 67 43.4 1941 78 Northcentral 39,055 House Rock Wash N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 17 Kanab Creek N ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ SR 68 27.88 1941 78 Northwest 5,557,490 Colorado River Y (Impaired) Y Temperature N A&Ww N ‐‐ ‐‐ 6 SR 69 33.87 1938 81 Northwest 17,037,470 Granite Creek Y (Not attaining) Y E. Coli N A&Wc, FBC, FC, AgI, AgL Y E. Coli Y 9.5 Watson Lake Y (Not attaining) Y TN Y ‐‐ Y TN Y DO N A&Ww Y DO Y pH N A&Ww, FBC, AgI, AgL Y pH Y TP Y ‐‐ Y TP Y SR 71 24.16 1936 83 Northwest 296,015 Sols Wash/Hassayampa River Y (Impaired, Not attaining) Y E.
    [Show full text]
  • Index 1 INDEX
    Index 1 INDEX A Blue Spring 76, 106, 110, 115 Bluff Spring Trail 184 Adeii Eechii Cliffs 124 Blythe 198 Agate House 140 Blythe Intaglios 199 Agathla Peak 256 Bonita Canyon Drive 221 Agua Fria Nat'l Monument 175 Booger Canyon 194 Ajo 203 Boundary Butte 299 Ajo Mountain Loop 204 Box Canyon 132 Alamo Canyon 205 Box (The) 51 Alamo Lake SP 201 Boyce-Thompson Arboretum 190 Alstrom Point 266, 302 Boynton Canyon 149, 161 Anasazi Bridge 73 Boy Scout Canyon 197 Anasazi Canyon 302 Bright Angel Canyon 25, 51 Anderson Dam 216 Bright Angel Point 15, 25 Angels Window 27 Bright Angel Trail 42, 46, 49, 61, 80, 90 Antelope Canyon 280, 297 Brins Mesa 160 Antelope House 231 Brins Mesa Trail 161 Antelope Point Marina 294, 297 Broken Arrow Trail 155 Apache Junction 184 Buck Farm Canyon 73 Apache Lake 187 Buck Farm Overlook 34, 73, 103 Apache-Sitgreaves Nat'l Forest 167 Buckskin Gulch Confluence 275 Apache Trail 187, 188 Buenos Aires Nat'l Wildlife Refuge 226 Aravaipa Canyon 192 Bulldog Cliffs 186 Aravaipa East trailhead 193 Bullfrog Marina 302 Arch Rock 366 Bull Pen 170 Arizona Canyon Hot Springs 197 Bush Head Canyon 278 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 216 Arizona Trail 167 C Artist's Point 250 Aspen Forest Overlook 257 Cabeza Prieta 206 Atlatl Rock 366 Cactus Forest Drive 218 Call of the Canyon 158 B Calloway Trail 171, 203 Cameron Visitor Center 114 Baboquivari Peak 226 Camp Verde 170 Baby Bell Rock 157 Canada Goose Drive 198 Baby Rocks 256 Canyon del Muerto 231 Badger Creek 72 Canyon X 290 Bajada Loop Drive 216 Cape Final 28 Bar-10-Ranch 19 Cape Royal 27 Barrio
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Comb Ridge
    THE ZEPHYR/ JUNE-JULY 2011 THE ORIGIN OF COMB RIDGE Robert Fillmore, Western State College of Colorado in Gunnison, CO (An excerpt and images from his new book: Geological Evolution of the Colorado Plateau) Comb Ridge is a lofty sinuous spine of red sandstone that stretch- ramp of Comb Ridge. Another notable result of this uplift is the es over 80 miles across northern Arizona and southeast Utah. This ensuing deep incision into the uplift by energized rivers as their monocline, as these structures are called, begins near Kayenta and runoff seeks a path to lower elevations. The deep narrow canyons snakes northward to fade away near the west flank of the Abajo of Cedar Mesa owe their existence to Monument Upwarp. Mountains. Monoclines are a peculiar component of the Colorado Plateau, with their long ridges of steeply tilted strata in a region otherwise known for its miles of flat-lying sedimentary rocks. They Monoclines are a peculiar component are hard to miss. Although not confined to the Colorado Plateau, of the Colorado Plateau, with their long ridges their concentration here is unique. Similar structures make up the of steeply tilted strata in a region San Rafael Swell, Capitol reef, and Colorado National monument otherwise known for its miles of near Grand Junction. All are closely related in origin and timing. flat-lying sedimentary rocks. They are hard to miss. The term monocline refers to a single-limbed fold; in simple geometric terms, a gargantuan ramp. The ramp of steeply tilted strata separates uplifted regions from those that have dropped The monoclines formed at the same time as the jagged Rocky downwards, relatively speaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. July 22, 2021 Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015 Effective March 17, 2021 The federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires states and federally recognized Indian tribes to adopt water quality standards in order to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's Waters" (CWA, 1988). The attached WQS document is in effect for Clean Water Act purposes with the exception of the following provisions. Navajo Nation’s previously approved criteria for these provisions remain the applicable for CWA purposes. The “Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015” (NNSWQS 2015) made changes amendments to the “Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2007” (NNSWQS 2007). For federal Clean Water Act permitting purposes, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) must approve these changes to the NNSWQS 2007 which are found in the NNSWQS 2015. The USEPA did not approve of three specific changes which were made to the NNSWQS 2007 and are in the NNSWQS 2015. (October 15, 2020 Letter from USEPA to Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency). The three specific changes which USEPA did not accept are: 1) Aquatic and Wildlife Habitat Designated Use - Suspended Solids Changes (NNSWQS 2015 Section 207.E) The suspended soils standard for aquatic and wildlife habitat designated use was changed to only apply to flowing (lotic) surface waters and not to non-flowing (lentic) surface waters.
    [Show full text]