Caroline A. Sullivan and Dermot P. O'regan CEH Wallingford

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Caroline A. Sullivan and Dermot P. O'regan CEH Wallingford Winners and losers in forest product commercialisation Final Report R7795 (May 2003) Volume 1 Overview Caroline A. Sullivan and Dermot P. O’Regan CEH Wallingford Maclean Building Crowmarsh Gifford Oxfordshire United Kingdom OX10 8BB Tel: +44(0) 1491 692417 Fax: +44(0) 1491 692338 [email protected] & [email protected] This report is an official document prepared under contract between the United Kingdom Department for International Development and the Natural Environment Research Council. It should not be quoted without the permission of both the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and the Department for International Development. Winners and Losers, Final Technical Report, 2003 FRP R7795 Winners and losers in forest product commercialisation Final Report R7795 May 2003 Volume 1 Overview Caroline A. Sullivan1 and Dermot P. O’Regan1 with contributions from other project team members: Sheona Shackleton2, Sharon Ousman3, Charlie Shackleton2, Myles Mander4, Rachel Wynberg5, Saskia den Adel6, Roger Leakey7, Tony Cunningham8, Andy Botelle6, Adrian Combrinck10, Vijay Datadin3, Janette Forte3, David Hammond3, Sarah Laird9, Cyril Lombard6, Twydale Martinborough3, Tania McHardy4, Jillian Muller10, Thiambi Netshiluvhi10, Katharine Payne3, Pierre du Plessis6, Uffe Poulsen1 and Vanda Radzik3. and: Jenny Botha2, Jill Cribbins4, Philippa Emmanuel2, Joselyn Grimmond3, Ivan Joseph3, Risto Laamanen6, Fonda Lewis4, Sibongile Ndlovu2, Kris Pate6, Joel Strong3 and Raquel Thomas (Guyana Forestry Commission). 1. CEH Wallingford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, United Kingdom. 2. Environmental Science Programme, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa. 3. Iwokrama International Centre for Rain Forest Conservation and Development, Georgetown, Guyana. 4. Institute of Natural Resources, Private Bag X01, Scotsville, 3209, South Africa. 5. Graduate School of Environmental Studies, University of Strathclyde, c/o PO Box 69, St James, 7946, South Africa. 6. CRIAA SA-DC, PO Box 23778, Windhoek, Namibia. 7. Agroforestry and Novel Crop Unit, School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia. 8. Ethnoecology Services, 84 Watkins St, White Gum Valley, Fremantle, 6162, Australia. 9. Department of Anthropology, University College, London. 10. CSIR Environmentek, Pretoria, South Africa. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, U.K. ii Winners and Losers, Final Technical Report, 2003 FRP R7795 Executive Summary The Winners and Losers in Forest Product Commercialisation project brings together the work of 24 researchers, investigating two different species (Sclerocarya birrea and Carapa guianensis) in South Africa, Namibia and Guyana. The research was carried out largely by local researchers in the study countries, and the findings provide some generic insights into NTFP market chains. Topics covered during this study range from an evaluation of basic ecological requirements for the two species, and how this knowledge can be used to increase yields, right through to a consideration of the intellectual property rights associated with their use, and the economic potential of income generation and benefit sharing. During the project, households in over 30 communities in three countries were involved in participatory assessment of the resource itself, and in identifying how much of it is used for domestic and commercial purposes. The data generated from this household assessment was strengthened by additional information collected through group meetings at each site. Further information was collected about commercial activities from different sources, reflecting the situation in a number of different commercial chains. With a view to addressing poverty, we have examined how different types of livelihood capital entitlements are likely to be influenced by the commercialisation process. As a result of this work, we have been able to address five research hypotheses, and, in answering these, we are able to conclude that in NTFP market chains, like many others, the major share of financial benefits from commercialisation is often captured by wholesalers, retailers and middlemen. Financial capital is an essential component in the chain, if human and social capital is to be integrated with natural capital to generate productive outputs. Failure to achieve this is often the result of inefficiencies in marketing chains, where the full value of all of the types of capital involved are not recognised or rewarded. In this study, we have also shown that it is possible for these difficulties to be overcome, if there is a cooperative spirit in the community, shared knowledge of resources, and adequate institutional strengths which can be mobilised for an equitable outcome for the community. For this to be realised, efforts would need to be made to ensure that the resource base, on which the commercial chain is built, is maintained and nurtured, and where necessary, appropriate tenure arrangements are put in place and enforced. At present, in the examples included here, there is no absolute threat to resources of marula and crabwood. It does seem likely, however, in some areas, that current depletion trends will need to be addressed by better management, and possibly domestication, if stocks of marula and crabwood resources are going to be available on a sustainable basis for future generations. Overall, our work has led to the conclusion that both winners and losers do exist in NTFP marketing chains, but higher levels of pareto optimality/equity can be generated if communities work together and use their own strengths to manage and use their resources effectively. Specific characteristics have been identified which give rise to wining outcomes, and recommendations on how to achieve these have been disseminated through many different media. As a result, it is hoped that this work can contribute to a better understanding of how the benefits from NTFPs can be realised for poor people, on an ecologically, economically and socially sustainable basis. From these findings, we have also highlighted some issues relating to NTFP use which can contribute to more effective realisation of some of the Millennium Development Goals. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, U.K. iii Winners and Losers, Final Technical Report, 2003 FRP R7795 Project Team Dr Caroline Sullivana CEH Wallingford, United Kingdom Dermot O'Reganb CEH Wallingford, United Kingdom Uffe Poulsen CEH Wallingford, United Kingdom Sheona Shackletonc Rhodes University, Republic of South Africa Dr Charlie Shackleton Rhodes University, Republic of South Africa Sharon Ousmand Iwokrama International Centre, Guyana Janette Forte Iwokrama International Centre, Guyana Dr David Hammond Iwokrama International Centre, Guyana Vijay Datadin Iwokrama International Centre, Guyana Twydale Martinborough Iwokrama International Centre, Guyana Katharine Payne Iwokrama International Centre, Guyana Vanda Radzik Iwokrama International Centre, Guyana Myles Mander Institute of Natural Resources, Republic of South Africa Tania McHardy Institute of Natural Resources, Republic of South Africa Rachel Wynberg University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom Saskia den Adel CRIAA SA-DC, Windhoek, Namibia Andy Botelle CRIAA SA-DC, Windhoek, Namibia Pierre du Plessis CRIAA SA-DC, Windhoek, Namibia Cyril Lombard CRIAA SA-DC, Windhoek, Namibia Dr Roger Leakey CEH Edinburgh/James Cook University, Australia Dr Tony Cunningham Ethnoecology Services, Freemantle, Australia Adrian Combrinck CSIR Environmentek, Republic of South Africa Jillian Muller CSIR Environmentek, Republic of South Africa Thiambi Netshiluvhi CSIR Environmentek, Republic of South Africa Sarah Laird Independent Consusltant, United States of America a Project Manager b Project Coordinator - UK c Project Coordinator - Southern Africa d Project Coordinator - Guyana Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, U.K. iv Winners and Losers, Final Technical Report, 2003 FRP R7795 Acknowledgements This publication is an output from the research project R7795, Forestry Research Programme, funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID. We are grateful to the many people who assisted during the course of the project. We especially thank the hundreds of participants who helped with the many surveys carried out and, in particular, we would like to thank the following who contributed their time, thoughts and knowledge to the project: In South Africa and Namibia: Bertrand Dayot and family, Busi Matukane, Eudafano members, Felicia Chiloane, Fonda Lewis, Girlie Njoni, Ina Lessing, Induna Mabaso, Jamie Pote, Jasmin Zitha, Jenny Botha, Jill Cribbins, Kas Holtzhausen, Kris Pate, Mabaso, Induna Makhatini, Magdalena and Sylvia Samuel, Matthew Gibb, Ncedile Zengethwa, Nomsa Nkuna, Nozipho Hoohlo, Philippa Emmanuel, Risto Laamanen, Sam Moropane, Sibongile Ndlovu, Sue Barton, Sylvia ‘the lily’, Thys Slabbert, Wessel de Wet and Zabeth Botha. In Guyana: Sydney Allicock (Director of the Bina Hill Institute, Region 9), Paulette Allicock (Surama), Lloyd Andrews (Ministry of Amerindian Affairs), Lawrence Anselmo (Captain-General of the Upper Mazaruni Sub-Region), Bowhan Balkaran (Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Fisheries, Crops and Livestock), Maurice Bennett, Cecilene Cambridge (Kwataman), Hazel Collins (Coomaka), Mr Deonarine (Deputy Regional Executive Officer, Region 2), Jocelyn Dow (Liana Cane Interiors), Brian Fox (Georgetown),
Recommended publications
  • Remnants of the Early Dutch in Guyana 1616-1815 Nova Zeelandia (New Zeeland
    Remnants Of The Early Dutch in Guyana 1616-1815 By Dmitri Allicock Coat of arms -Flag of the Dutch West Indian Company- 1798 Map of Essequibo and Demerara Nova Zeelandia (New Zeeland} Guyana is the only English-speaking country in South America, but English has been the official language for less than half the time Europeans occupied the country. The Dutch language was the main medium of communication for 232 years, from the time a group of Dutchmen sailed up the Pomeroon River and settled there, to 1812 when English replaced Dutch as the language used in the Court of Policy (Parliament). To this day, hundreds of villages have retained their original Dutch names like Uitvlugt, Vergenoegen and Zeeburg. Some present-day Guyanese have names like Westmaas, Van Lange and Meertens. No Guyanese citizen or visitor can escape visible and other reminders of our Dutch predecessors. The ruins of a brick fort can still be seen on a little island where the Essequibo, Mazaruni and Cuyuni rivers meet. The original fort was a wooden structure built around 1600 by some Dutch traders who called it Kyk-over-al or "See-over-all" because it provided a commanding view of the three rivers. From 1627 the fort was controlled by the Dutch West India Company, a Holland-based organization which was vested with the power to establish colonies and which monopolized Dutch trade in the New World. The Company appointed Adrianetz Groenewegel as its first Commander to administer Kyk-over-al. The wooden fort was replaced in the 1630s by a brick structure which also served as an administrative centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Zeelandia: This Fort Was Built in 1744
    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION PRIMARY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMME GRADE FOUR WORKSHEET-TERM 3 SOCIAL STUDIES WEEK 6: LESSON 2 TOPIC: FORTS AND MONUMENTS NAME: _______________________________________ DATE: _______________________________ FACTS/TIPS: The significance of Forts in Guyana: Fort Zeelandia: This fort was built in 1744. It was built to protect the interests of the Dutch West Indian Company from European enemies such as English and France, who would travel to the eastern coast of South America to rage war. It was also constructed to serve as a stronghold against other forces such as rebellious slaves. Fort Kyk-Over-Al: This Dutch fort was built in the colony of Essequibo. All that remains is a small brick archway. It was constructed in 1616 and was an important centre of colonial operations and a target for rival British forces. It once served as the centre for the Dutch administration of the country. The name Kyk-Over- Al is Dutch, which means 'see over all'. 46 Fort Nassau: Fort Nassau was the capital of the Dutch colony of Berbice. In 1627 permission was sought by a Dutch settler to settle in Berbice. He misused the resources of Berbice by trading with the Amerindians. Settlements around this fort became a successful trading post. This fort was burnt by the French in 1712 but was rebuilt by the Dutch in 1733. ON YOUR OWN: ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS. Write your answers on the lines. 1. State one reason why Fort Zeelandia was constructed. ___________________________________________________________ 2. Fort Kyk-Over-Al is a ___________ name. English French Dutch Spanish 47 Match the Forts to the year they were constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Berbice River: the River That Bears Witness by Major General (Retd) Joseph G Singh MSS, Msc, FRGS
    The Berbice River: The River that Bears Witness by Major General (retd) Joseph G Singh MSS, MSc, FRGS “I’ve known rivers: ancient as the world and older than the flow of human blood in human veins. My soul has grown deep like the rivers. I have known rivers: ancient dusky rivers My soul has grown deep like the rivers.” Langston Hughes (1902-1967) Introduction Guyana has 14 major drainage basins and four principal rivers –the Corentyne River bordering Suriname, the Berbice River, the Demerara River, and the Essequibo River. This article on the Berbice River follows those on The Magnificent Essequibo River (2012) and The Wonderful Demerara River (2013) in the Series: FASCINATING RIVERS OF GUYANA. Geologically, Guyana falls within that part of South America lying between the Atlantic Ocean, the Orinoco and Amazon Rivers, referred to by scientists as the Guiana Shield, a region which is built around a central core of very ancient rocks, the origin of which predates the existence of life on earth. Hydrologic History The Berbice River System is the 20th of the thirty largest watersheds in exporting water from the Guiana Shield into the Amazon or the Atlantic Ocean1. Its estimated surface area is 16,600 km² as compared with the Essequibo (3rd) – 157,000 km², and the Demerara River (27th) with a surface area of 8,200 km². The Berbice River rises in the highlands of southern Guyana and its source springs are in the formation east of the Kanukus with altitude approximately 350 m. It flows for 595 km through dense forests and scrub savannahs to the coastal plain and enters the Atlantic Ocean at New Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • The West Indian Web Improvising Colonial Survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800
    The West Indian Web Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 Bram Hoonhout Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 22 February 2017 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization The West Indian Web Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 Bram Hoonhout Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. dr. Jorge Flores (EUI) Prof. dr. Regina Grafe (EUI) Prof. dr. Cátia Antunes (Leiden University) Prof. dr. Gert Oostindie, KITLV/Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies © Bram Hoonhout, 2017 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I Bram Hoonhoutcertify that I am the author of the work The West Indian web. Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications. I certify that this work complies with the Code of Ethics in Academic Research issued by the European University Institute (IUE 332/2/10 (CA 297).
    [Show full text]
  • 'Their Power Has Been Broken, the Danger Had Passed': Dutch
    Early Modern Low Countries 2 (2018) 1, pp. 45-67 - eISSN: 2543-1587 45 “Their power has been broken, the danger has passed” Dutch newspaper coverage of the Berbice slave revolt, 1763 Esther Baakman Esther Baakman is a PhD candidate at Leiden University Institute for History and is currently working on her PhD thesis in which she studies the representation of the Atlantic world in Dutch newspapers between c. 1635-1820. Her research is part of prof. Michiel van Groesen’s NWO project Covering the Ocean – Newspapers and Information Management in the Atlantic World, 1580-1820. Abstract In February 1763 one of the largest and longest slave revolts erupted in the Dutch col- ony of Berbice. As the majority of the white population fled, colonial authorities were left behind with few, and mostly ill soldiers, and in no time the insurgents controlled the colony almost completely. This rebellion did not only shake the colonial govern- ment to the core, but also made a significant (media) impact in the Dutch Republic. For the duration of the Berbice rebellion substantial reports on the revolt appeared in the Dutch press, and other print media, such as pamphlets and news digests, also devoted attention to the issue. This article studies the rebellion through newspaper reports and provides a glimpse of the reception of the Berbice revolt in the Dutch Republic. It shows that slavery was already a public affair around the middle of the eighteenth century and not, as it is often presented, a limited, mostly scholarly debate. It will explore whether the extensive coverage affected the public perception of slavery in the Dutch Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Speech 2021
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. The Global and Regional Economic Context 6 3. Developments in the Domestic Economy in 2020 8 A. Real Gross Domestic Product 8 B. Sectoral Performance 8 a. Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry 8 b. Extractive Industries 9 c. Manufacturing 10 d. Electricity and Water Supply and Sewerage 10 e. Construction 11 f. Services 11 C. Balance of Payments 11 D. Monetary Developments 12 E. Prices and Income 13 a. Inflation 13 b. Interest Rates 13 c. Income 13 F. Fiscal Position 14 a. Non-Financial Public Sector 14 b. Central Government 14 c. Public Enterprises 15 G. Public Debt Management 15 4. Sectoral Vision and Plans – the Agenda for 2021 and Beyond 17 A. Introduction 17 B. Macroeconomic Outlook 17 C. The Low Carbon Development Strategy 18 i D. A Diversified, Resilient and Competitive Productive Sector 19 a. Oil and Gas 19 b. Other Extractives 21 i. Gold 21 ii. Bauxite 22 iii. Sand 23 iv. Stone 23 v. Manganese 23 c. Forestry 24 d. Agriculture and Food Security 25 i. Sugar 26 ii. Rice 28 iii. Other Crops 29 iv. Agro-Processing 30 v. Livestock 30 vi. Fisheries and Aquaculture 31 vii. Intermediate Savannah Development Initiative 31 viii. Drainage and Irrigation 32 e. Sustainable Tourism 32 f. Information and Communications Technology 34 g. Industrial Development and Manufacturing 35 h. Small Business Support 36 E. Transformational Infrastructure 37 a. Energy Expansion and Diversification 37 b. Transport Infrastructure 39 i. Road and Bridges 39 ii. Air Transport 41 iii. River and Maritime Transport 41 c.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Education
    Social Studies For Our Children Book6 .••, ~ A GOG/EFA-FTI Project ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Ministry of Education wishes to acknowledge the work done by the following persons who were involved in the production of the first edition: Ruth Persico, (team leader) Chery1 Foster Myrtle Fraser Pearl Marks Winifred Toney Marvin Bart Maylene Duncan Franciene Doris The work of the following persons who were involved in the production of the second edition is also acknowledged: Andrew Kartick Philip Kartick Claudette Phoenix * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * © 2004 Ministry of Education, Georgetown, Guyana. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior pern1ission of the copyright owner. Published by The Ministry of Education Georgetown, Guyana. Printed by VonHoffmann Corporation Revised 2004 ll SOCIAL STUDIES FOR OUR CHILDREN BOOK6 WRlTlNG TEA11: Ruth Persico [team leaderl Cheryl Foster Myrtle Fraser Pearl Marks Winifred Toney SUBJECT SPECIALIST: Marvin Bart ILLUSTRATOR: l\llaylene Duncan DESIGN TYPIST: Franciene Doris GRAPHICS PLACED BY: Franciene Doris COVER DESIGN BY: ivfaylene Duncan Marvin Bart A GOG/EFA-FTI Project Easy Path Series NOT FOR SALE PRINTED FOR THE l\illNISTRY OF EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF GUYANA. iii FOREWORD One welcomes the publication of this series of textbooks as parl of the Primary Education Improve1nent Project funded by the Tnter-A1ncrican Development Bank and the Government of Guyana. This selies of texts has been long in planning, writing and producing. In the process however, many Guyanese have developed skills in textbook writing and publication. This will serve Education well in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Adriaan Van Berkel to Guiana
    the voyages of voyages the the voyages of Adriaan van Berkel to guiana This book is a reissue of the travelogue of Adriaan van Berkel, first published in Adriaan van Berkel to guiana to Berkel van Adriaan 1695 by Johan ten Hoorn in Amsterdam. The first part deals with Van Berkel’s adventures in the Dutch colony located on the Berbice River in the Guianas; the second part is a description of Surinam, the adjacent colony the Dutch took over from the British in 1667. This reissue, edited by Martijn van den Bel, Lodewijk Hulsman and Lodewijk Wagenaar, contains a new annotated English translation as well as an integral the voyages of rendition of the original Dutch text. In addition, an in-depth introduction contextualizing Adriaan van Berkel and his travels is included. What was the raison d’être of the Dutch presence in the Guianas? Who was this young man Adriaan van Berkel who, at age 23, left the Netherlands to serve as a colonial secretary in Berbice? His four-year stay and fascinating encounters with local Amerindians are commented to guiana on by two specialists in Amerindian history: Van den Bel and Hulsman. During the 17th century the inhabitants of Netherlands knew little about the Dutch colonies in the Guianas, the area between Brazil and Venezuela. By studying newspapers, published between 1667 and 1695, Lodewijk Wagenaar (former Senior Curator of the Amsterdam Museum) discovered surprising news items. Van Berkel’s account of the armed conflict with the Indians for example closely matched the contemporary newspaper reports. The second part of Van Berkel’s book contains a description of his travels to Surinam.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE BOOKS on Guyana and Other Subjects by Lal Balkaran
    REFERENCE BOOKS On Guyana and Other Subjects By Lal Balkaran TIMELINES OF GUYANESE HISTORY: 1498-2006 – A Chronological Guide To Over 1500 Major Events Organised in 23 Subjects ISBN 978-0-9735545-3-3 $29.95 Here is a solid reference book on Guyana. It captures key events over the years from 1498 (when Columbus first sailed past the coast) right up to 2006. There are also eight entries covering the BC era in the Amerindian section showing the movement of Guyana’s first inhabitants. Discover the history of Guyana – its people, the explorers, the politicians, the naturalists, the extraordinary feats of human accomplishments, and a host of other key issues. The information is fascinating and informative. Indeed, the amazing historical facts have been drawn from books, reports, periodicals, pamphlets, and the internet. The short format of issues and events makes for excellent reading in this era of information overload and time constraints. Over 1500 events and issues in chronological order are classified into 23 categories as follows: Amerindians, Architecture, Business, Church, Culture, Diplomatic, Economic, Education, Exploration, General (including Natural History, Royal Visits, and Philately), Georgetown, Immigration (including Indentureship), Legal, Literary, Media, Military, Mining, Music, Political, Slavery, Sports, Territorial, and Trade Unions. This is indeed a unique and comprehensive reference showcasing the range of issues that helped shape Guyana and Guyanese. The chronological sequence presented in a tabulated format and the classification of the issues and events will enable the easy location of information. Entries are cross-referenced where possible. Sample Entries ARCHITECTURE 1627 Fort Nassau is constructed up the Berbice River by Abraham Van Pere.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghelein Van Stapels
    The Journal of the Hakluyt Society January 2015 The Voyage of Gelein van Stapels to the Amazon River, the Guianas and the Caribbean, 1629–1630 Transcribed and translated by Martin van Wallenburg, Alistair Bright, Lodewijk Hulsman & Martijn van den Bel Dedicated to Neil Lancelot Whitehead (1956–2012) CONTENTS Preface 2 Introduction The background to the voyage 2 The biography of Gelein van Stapels 7 The previous voyages of Gelein van Stapels 9 The voyage of 1629–30 12 Terra firma 12 The Caribbean 18 The other voyages of Gelein van Stapels 21 The Journal 25 The Descriptions by Gelein van Stapels 26 The Journal of Gelein van Stapels 53 Appendices 1. Toponyms used in the manuscript 77 2. Personal names and ethnonyms used in the manuscript 80 3. Ship names used in the manuscript 81 Maps and Illustrations (may be magnified to show detail) Fig. 1 Geopolitical map of the Netherlands 5 Fig. 2 Detail of Vingboon’s map of the Lower Amazon 14 Fig. 3 Vingboon’s map of Tobago 18 Fig. 4 Ship’s list for the 1629 expedition of Admiral Pater 19 Fig. 5 Photograph of a typical page from the manuscript 23 Fig. 6 Map of the first part of the voyage 24 Fig. 7 Map of the second part of the voyage 24 Manuscript maps by Van Stapels Map of the Berbice River 30 Map of the mouth of the Rio Puercos 34 Map of the River Orinoco 41 Map of Santa Marta 49 Map of the Caicos 52 2 PREFACE The manuscript presented here to the reader contains a detailed description of a voyage made in 1629–30 by the Dutch sea captain Gelein van Stapels along the northern coast of South America and throughout the Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Concerning the AWAD Workshop Guyana Organised in Georgetown on 20 June 2006
    Report concerning the AWAD workshop Guyana organised in Georgetown on 20 June 2006 Amsterdam/The Hague, September 2006 Lodewijk Wagenaar James Rose Johan van Langen a mutual heritage project Contents Introduction 3 General setup of the workshop 5 1. Paper Heritage 6 2. Monuments and archaeological sites 8 3. Museums and moveable tangible heritage 11 4. Intangible heritage 16 5. Research 18 6. Conclusions and recommendations 20 7. Visits to pertinent Locations (19 June 2006) 23 Appendix A: Text and Minutes of the presentations of the AWAD 36 local workshop in Guyana Appendix B: List of participants Guyana workshop 58 2 a mutual heritage project Introduction The first stage or identification mission of the Atlantic World and the Dutch, 1500- 2000 (AWAD) will be concluded with an international Atlantic conference, scheduled for November 2006. This conference will be attended by representatives from all cultural heritage sectors and from the academic/research world in countries where a more lasting Dutch presence was established (Aruba, Brazil, Ghana, Guyana, The Netherlands Antilles, Suriname and the United States of America) and from organizations in the Netherlands. In preparation of the Atlantic conference a series of workshops will be organized in all participating countries. The overall purpose of these workshops is to: - draw up for each country an inventory of current activities, collections, expertise, needs and wishes regarding research and the preservation, restoration and accessibility of the mutual cultural heritage in its broadest sense; - discuss the improvement and extension of the AWAD online database/research guide as an integrating tool for developing and implementing the activities/projects for the second project phase; - establish priorities and points of focus for each individual country in the fields of preservation, accessibility and research of the mutual heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Grade 4 Social Studies Week 6 Lesson 1
    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION PRIMARY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMME GRADE FOUR WORKSHEET-TERM 3 SOCIAL STUDIES WEEK 6: LESSON 1 TOPIC: FORTS AND MONUMENTS NAME: _______________________________________ DATE: _______________________________ FACTS/TIPS: A monument can be described as anything set up in memory of some person or event which is of national significance. Some monuments played a significant part in Guyana's early history. These monuments are now ruined but have been preserved so that all Guyanese may be aware of their importance. Some of these monuments are: Location of these monuments: Fort Nova Zeelandia: This fort is located on Fort Island, approximately 16 kilometres from the mouth of the Essequibo River. 43 Fort Kyk-over-al: The ruins of Fort Kyk-Over-Al are located on a small island at the Mazaruni and Cuyuni Rivers' confluence, about 47 miles southwest of Georgetown. Fort Nassau: The remains of Fort Nassau are located approximately 55 miles from the mouth of the right bank of the Berbice River and borders the Torani Creek. These forts were built by the Dutch. ON YOUR OWN: ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS. Write your answers on the lines. 1. Monuments are important to Guyanese for all of the following reasons except Helping us to remember important events. Reminding us of our history. Focusing on our cultural achievements. 2. Which fort is located about 55 miles up the Berbice River? _________________________________________________________________ 3. On Fort Island one can find the remains of Fort ______________. 4. Fort Kyk–Over-Al was named by the ___________________. 44 Write the name of the fort shown in the picture.
    [Show full text]