Where Do Mount Baker Snoqualmie National Forest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Where Do Mount Baker Snoqualmie National Forest Portland State University PDXScholar Geography Faculty Publications and Presentations Geography 5-31-2014 Where Do Mount Baker Snoqualmie National Forest Visitors Go and Which Roads Do They Use To Get There? An Analysis of the Spatial Data from the 2013 Sustainable Roads Workshops Rebecca J. McLain Portland State University, [email protected] David Banis Portland State University, [email protected] Alexa Todd Portland State University Mike Psaris Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geog_fac Part of the Geographic Information Sciences Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details McLain, R., D. Banis, A. Todd, and M. Psaris. May 31, 2014. Where do Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest visitors go and which roads do they use to get there? An analysis of the spatial data from the 2013 Sustainable Roads Workshops. Prepared for the Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest and Sustainable Roads Cadre. This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Where Do Mount Baker Snoqualmie National Forest Visitors Go and Which Roads Do They Use To Get There? An Analysis of the Spatial Data from the 2013 Sustainable Roads Workshops Prepared by: Rebecca McLain, David Banis, Alexa Todd, and Mike Psaris (Portland State Department of Geography) Prepared for: The Wilderness Society/Sustainable Roads Cadre May 31, 2014 1 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Data processing challenges ......................................................................................................................... 4 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Density and diversity maps overview ......................................................................................................... 6 Map Set 1: Combined workshops destination and road densities ............................................................. 7 Figure 1 – Combined workshops destination and road densities............................................................ 9 Map Set 2: District destination and road densities ................................................................................... 10 Figure 2 – Destination and road densities for the Mt Baker Ranger District ......................................... 12 Figure 3 – Destinations and road densities for the Darrington Ranger District ..................................... 13 Figure 4 – Destination and road densities for the Skykomish Ranger District ....................................... 14 Figure 5 – Destinations and road densities for the Snoqualmie Ranger District ................................... 15 Map Set 3: Residential area destinations and road densities .................................................................. 16 Figure 6 – Boundaries of the Residential Areas .................................................................................... 19 Figure 8 – Destinations and road densities for the Mountain Loop Residential Area ........................... 21 Figure 9 – Destination and road densities for the Highway 2 Residential Area..................................... 22 Figure 10 – Destination and road densities for the Everett/Skagit Residential Area ............................ 23 Figure 11 – Destination and road densities for the North/East King Residential Area .......................... 24 Figure 12 – Destination and road densities for the Pierce/South King Residential Area ....................... 25 Map Set 4: Activity destination and road densities................................................................................... 26 Table 1: Activity categories and example activities ............................................................................... 26 Figure 13 – Destination and road densities for hiking ........................................................................... 30 Figure 14 – Destination and road densities for strenuous recreation ................................................... 31 Figure 15 – Destination and road densities for motorized recreation .................................................. 32 Figure 16 – Destination and road densities for observation ................................................................. 33 Figure 17 – Destination and road densities for camping/relaxation ..................................................... 34 Figure 18 – Destinations and road densities for sociocultural activities ............................................... 35 Figure 19 – Destinations and road densities for winter recreation ....................................................... 36 Figure 20 – Destination and road densities for collecting/harvesting ................................................... 37 Map Set 5: Values destination and road densities ................................................................................... 38 Table 2 – Values categories and examples of values............................................................................. 38 Figure 21 – Destination and road densities for access/proximity ......................................................... 41 2 Figure 22 – Destination and road densities for serenity/solitude ......................................................... 42 Figure 23 – Destination and road densities for aesthetic ...................................................................... 43 Figure 24 – Destination and road densities for nature/wilderness ....................................................... 44 Assessing diversity of uses ........................................................................................................................ 45 Table 3 – Diversity of use at high density destinations for activities..................................................... 45 Table 4 – Diversity of use at high density destinations for values ......................................................... 46 Map Set 6: Activity and value diversity for roads ..................................................................................... 47 Figure 25 – Activity diversity for roads .................................................................................................. 49 Figure 26 – Values diversity for roads ................................................................................................... 50 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................ 51 Appendix A – Combined workshops road density summary ..................................................................... 53 Appendix B – Residential areas: High density destinations ....................................................................... 55 Appendix C – Map of high destinations and roads.................................................................................... 56 Appendix D - Kernel density and diversity index methods ........................................................................ 57 Figure C-1 – Comparison of Shannon and Simpson index weights........................................................ 59 3 INTRODUCTION This report provides an overview of the key patterns that emerged from the spatial analyses of the destination and route data collected during the 2013 Sustainable Roads workshops on the Mount Baker Snoqualmie (MBS) National Forest. We excluded the pilot workshop data from the analyses because a somewhat different process was used to collect the mapped data. The data used in the analysis was collected from 262 participants in eight workshops (Bellingham, Sedro-Woolley, Darrington, Monroe, Everett, Seattle, Issaquah, Enumclaw). During the workshops, participants mapped up to eight destinations of importance to them, and in most cases, also mapped the routes they took to each destination. For each destination and its associated route, participants also provided the following information. Name of the place Why the destination is especially important What activities or work the participant does there How often the participant visits the place in a typical year What type of transportation the participant uses to get there Of the 262 participants, 252 provided useable data for destinations and 246 provided useable data for roads. The dataset used in the spatial analysis contained 1733 records for destinations and 1609 records for roads. We entered the worksheet data for the destination and road mapping exercise into an Excel spreadsheet. The activities associated with each destination were grouped into eight categories (camping/relaxation, collecting/harvesting, hiking, motorized recreation, observation, sociocultural, strenuous recreation, and winter recreation). Although most people listed no more than two activities for a location, some people listed up to six different activities for certain destinations. The description of why a participant visited a particular location was similarly classified as a set of eight different values. Given the way the question was
Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
    l 122 EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL ASPECTS OPEN FILE REPORT 92-2 EARTHQUAKES AND Ludwin, R. S.; Malone, S. D.; Crosson, R. EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Washington SEISMOLOGY - 1946 EVENT ASPECTS eanhquak:es, 1985. Clague, J. J., 1989, Research on eanh- Ludwin, R. S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Reeval­ Perkins, J. B.; Moy, Kenneth, 1989, Llabil­ quak:e-induced ground failures in south­ uation of the 19th century Washington ity of local government for earthquake western British Columbia [abstract). and Oregon eanhquake catalog using hazards and losses-A guide to the law Evans, S. G., 1989, The 1946 Mount Colo­ original accounts-The moderate sized and its impacts in the States of Califor­ nel Foster rock avalanches and auoci­ earthquake of May l, 1882 [abstract). nia, Alaska, Utah, and Washington; ated displacement wave, Vancouver Is­ Final repon. Maley, Richard, 1986, Strong motion accel­ land, British Columbia. erograph stations in Oregon and Wash­ Hasegawa, H. S.; Rogers, G. C., 1978, EARTHQUAKES AND ington (April 1986). Appendix C Quantification of the magnitude 7.3, SEISMOLOGY - NETWORKS Malone, S. D., 1991, The HAWK seismic British Columbia earthquake of June 23, AND CATALOGS data acquisition and analysis system 1946. [abstract). Berg, J. W., Jr.; Baker, C. D., 1963, Oregon Hodgson, E. A., 1946, British Columbia eanhquak:es, 1841 through 1958 [ab­ Milne, W. G., 1953, Seismological investi­ earthquake, June 23, 1946. gations in British Columbia (abstract). stract). Hodgson, J. H.; Milne, W. G., 1951, Direc­ Chan, W.W., 1988, Network and array anal­ Munro, P. S.; Halliday, R. J.; Shannon, W.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-1963, Pamphlet
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1963 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SKYKOMISH RIVER 30- BY 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R.W. Tabor, V.A. Frizzell, Jr., D.B. Booth, R.B. Waitt, J.T. Whetten, and R.E. Zartman INTRODUCTION From the eastern-most edges of suburban Seattle, the Skykomish River quadrangle stretches east across the low rolling hills and broad river valleys of the Puget Lowland, across the forested foothills of the North Cascades, and across high meadowlands to the bare rock peaks of the Cascade crest. The quadrangle straddles parts of two major river systems, the Skykomish and the Snoqualmie Rivers, which drain westward from the mountains to the lowlands (figs. 1 and 2). In the late 19th Century mineral deposits were discovered in the Monte Cristo, Silver Creek and the Index mining districts within the Skykomish River quadrangle. Soon after came the geologists: Spurr (1901) studied base- and precious- metal deposits in the Monte Cristo district and Weaver (1912a) and Smith (1915, 1916, 1917) in the Index district. General geologic mapping was begun by Oles (1956), Galster (1956), and Yeats (1958a) who mapped many of the essential features recognized today. Areas in which additional studies have been undertaken are shown on figure 3. Our work in the Skykomish River quadrangle, the northwest quadrant of the Wenatchee 1° by 2° quadrangle, began in 1975 and is part of a larger mapping project covering the Wenatchee quadrangle (fig. 1). Tabor, Frizzell, Whetten, and Booth have primary responsibility for bedrock mapping and compilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Feature Web 05-04
    the Centers for Disease Control, only 15 percent of the Healthy Hiking U.S. adult population is getting enough physical activity. “Our goal,” says Julie CHIEFELBEIN Gerberding, Director of the S AVE CDC, “is to help people D understand that even modest activity such as walking or gardening is a step in the right direction.” According to the American Hiking Society, the benefits of hiking or walking just 30 minutes a day are impressive: ⌧Decreased cholesterol ⌧Lowering of blood pressure ⌧Releasing of calming endorphins ⌧Preventing osteoporosis ⌧Relieving back pain ⌧Reducing insulin needed by diabetics Detailed info on these Getting fit on studies are available at www.americanhiking.org. the trail is For those of us who already hike, none of this is terribly surprising. easy, fun, and “It’s a great break from the routine,” says Debra Gore, a good for you. family practice doctor with Group Health in Spokane. “It’s a great stress relief from the hassles of sitting in front of a computer all day.” And for those who want to get out more and enjoy these benefits, there’s good news: you don’t have to be a buff mountain By Andrew Engelson years later, he’s still getting up into the climber to get started. It’s easy. backcountry. He and other hikers his As with any exercise program, if Julian Ansell is evidence that hiking age are as good a case as any for the you’re just beginning, consult your is good for you. physical and emotional benefits of doctor or medical provider first to The retired physician and Washing- hiking.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Summits
    EVERETT MOUNTAINEERS Recommended Winter Summits Snow and weather conditions greatly influence the difficulty of winter scrambles. Because conditions change very quickly, things like road access, avalanche hazard, strenuousness, and summit success can vary a tremendous amount. So these ratings are only a rough comparison of the peaks. Winter scrambling can be a dangerous activity. Be a smart scrambler -- be willing to turn back if conditions are unsafe. Even a slight deviation from the surveyed routes may affect exposure and avalanche hazard considerably. The fact that a peak is listed here does not represent that it will be safe. Exposure Rating Avalanche Rating A: Falling will only get snow on your face. B: Falling may require self arrest, but usually good A: Usually safe in high, considerable, moderate, and low run-out. avalanche conditions. C: Falling requires self arrest, unchecked falls could B: Often safe in moderate and low conditions. be serious. C: Only recommended in low conditions. Note that B-rated slopes could become C-rated when icy. Table of contents by region (peaks within each region listed from West to East): Highway 542 (Mt Baker Highway): Church, Excelsior, Barometer, Herman, Table Highway 20 (North Cascades Highway): Goat, Welker, Sauk, Lookout, Hidden Lake, Oakes, Damnation, Trappers, Sourdough, Ruby Highway 530 (Darrington area): Higgins, Round, Prairie Mountain Loop Highway: Pilchuck, Gordon (Anaconda), Long, Marble, Dickerman Highway 2 (west & east of Stevens Pass): Stickney, Persis, Philadelphia, Frog, Mineral Butte, Iron, Conglomerate Point, Baring, Palmer, Cleveland, Eagle Rock, Evergreen, Captain Point, Windy, Tunnel Vision, Big Chief, Cowboy, McCausland, Union, Jove, Lichtenberg, Jim Hill, Rock, Arrowhead, Natapoc, Tumwater I-90 (west & east of Snoqualmie Pass): Teneriffe, Green, Mailbox, Washington, Web, Kent, Bandera, Defiance, Pratt, Granite, Humpback, Silver, Snoqualmie, Kendall, Guye, Catherine, Margaret, Baldy, Thomas, Amabalis, Hex, Jolly, Yellow Hill, Teanaway Butte Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • 1976 Bicentennial Mckinley South Buttress Expedition
    THE MOUNTAINEER • Cover:Mowich Glacier Art Wolfe The Mountaineer EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Verna Ness, Editor; Herb Belanger, Don Brooks, Garth Ferber. Trudi Ferber, Bill French, Jr., Christa Lewis, Mariann Schmitt, Paul Seeman, Loretta Slater, Roseanne Stukel, Mary Jane Ware. Writing, graphics and photographs should be submitted to the Annual Editor, The Mountaineer, at the address below, before January 15, 1978 for consideration. Photographs should be black and white prints, at least 5 x 7 inches, with caption and photo­ grapher's name on back. Manuscripts should be typed double· spaced, with at least 1 Y:z inch margins, and include writer's name, address and phone number. Graphics should have caption and artist's name on back. Manuscripts cannot be returned. Properly identified photographs and graphics will be returnedabout June. Copyright © 1977, The Mountaineers. Entered as second·class matter April8, 1922, at Post Office, Seattle, Washington, under the act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly, except July, when semi-monthly, by The Mountaineers, 719 Pike Street,Seattle, Washington 98101. Subscription price, monthly bulletin and annual, $6.00 per year. ISBN 0-916890-52-X 2 THE MOUNTAINEERS PURPOSES To explore and study the mountains, forests, and watercourses of the Northwest; To gather into permanentform the history and tra­ ditions of thisregion; To preserve by the encouragement of protective legislation or otherwise the natural beauty of NorthwestAmerica; To make expeditions into these regions in fulfill­ ment of the above purposes; To encourage a spirit of good fellowship among all loversof outdoor life. 0 � . �·' ' :···_I·:_ Red Heather ' J BJ. Packard 3 The Mountaineer At FerryBasin B.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Physical Controls for Base Met Al Deposition in the Cascade Range of Washington
    State of Washington Department of Natural Resources BERT L. COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 58 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CONTROLS FOR BASE MET AL DEPOSITION IN THE CASCADE RANGE OF WASHINGTON By ALAN ROBERT GRANT STATE PRINTING PLANT ~ OLYMPIA, WASHINCTON 1969 For safe by Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. Price $1.50 Errata sheet for Washington Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 58, Chemical and Physical Controls for Base Metal Deeosition in the Cascade Range of Washington ( By Alan Robert Grant Errors noted in the p-inted text are listed below. The editors regret these and possibly other mistakes in editing. Page 12 Paragraph 5, line 2, "heliocpter" should read helicopter. 14 Paragraph 6, line 6, •programed" should read programmed. 15 Figure 2, 11 Ntesoic" in explanation should read Mesozoic. 19 Paragraph 4, line 7, "authochthonous" should read autochthonous. 22 Paragraph 6, line 4, "extension Ntesozoic 11 should read exten•ioo.o f 1l1e Mesozoic. 22 Paragraph 7, line 1, ''aforemention" should read aforementioned. 25 Paragraph 4, line 7, "Misch" should be changed to Vance. 25 Paragraph 7, line 7, "Totoosh, pluton" should read Totoosh pluton. 26 Paragraph 1, line 4, "classical" should read classic. 32 Paragraph 4, line 1, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive. 33 Paragraph 1, line 1, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive. 48 Une 3 of Figure 16 caption, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive~ 49 Paragraph 3, line 5, "Creasy" should read Creasey. 51 Paragraph 3, line 1, "Creasy II should read Creasey.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of Washington - Northwest Quadrant
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF WASHINGTON - NORTHWEST QUADRANT by JOE D. DRAGOVICH, ROBERT L. LOGAN, HENRY W. SCHASSE, TIMOTHY J. WALSH, WILLIAM S. LINGLEY, JR., DAVID K . NORMAN, WENDY J. GERSTEL, THOMAS J. LAPEN, J. ERIC SCHUSTER, AND KAREN D. MEYERS WASHINGTON DIVISION Of GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGIC MAP GM-50 2002 •• WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF 4 r Natural Resources Doug Sutherland· Commissioner of Pubhc Lands Division ol Geology and Earth Resources Ron Telssera, Slate Geologist WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Ron Teissere, State Geologist David K. Norman, Assistant State Geologist GEOLOGIC MAP OF WASHINGTON­ NORTHWEST QUADRANT by Joe D. Dragovich, Robert L. Logan, Henry W. Schasse, Timothy J. Walsh, William S. Lingley, Jr., David K. Norman, Wendy J. Gerstel, Thomas J. Lapen, J. Eric Schuster, and Karen D. Meyers This publication is dedicated to Rowland W. Tabor, U.S. Geological Survey, retired, in recognition and appreciation of his fundamental contributions to geologic mapping and geologic understanding in the Cascade Range and Olympic Mountains. WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGIC MAP GM-50 2002 Envelope photo: View to the northeast from Hurricane Ridge in the Olympic Mountains across the eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca to the northern Cascade Range. The Dungeness River lowland, capped by late Pleistocene glacial sedi­ ments, is in the center foreground. Holocene Dungeness Spit is in the lower left foreground. Fidalgo Island and Mount Erie, composed of Jurassic intrusive and Jurassic to Cretaceous sedimentary rocks of the Fidalgo Complex, are visible as the first high point of land directly across the strait from Dungeness Spit.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Trails Association » $4.50
    Plant a hiker’s garden, p.26 See orcas, p.34 Stay hydrated, p.31 WASHINGTON TRAILS March + April 2010 » A Publication of Washington Trails Association www.wta.org » $4.50 Reading the Rocks: Interpreting the Geologic Forces that Shape Washington’s Landscape Take Steps Into Wilderness With WTA, p.12 Day Hikes and Cheap Sleeps, p.28 Hiker’s Primavera Pasta, p.35 » Table of Contents March+April 2010 Volume 46, Issue 2 News + Views The Front Desk » Elizabeth Lunney An attempt at expressing gratitude. » p.4 The Signpost » Lace Thornberg If your life on trail was an album, which days would you play again? » p.5 Hiking News » Updates on Cape Horn, the Ice Age Floods National Geologic Trail, the Stehekin Road and more. » p.6 4 WTA at Work Holly Chambers Trail Work » Alan Carter Mortimer WTA’s volunteer crew leaders show dedication. » p.10 On the Web » Susan Elderkin Spring is here. Where will you be hiking? » p.14 Action for Trails » Kindra Ramos “Rookies” prove to be great lobbyists for DNR funding. » p.16 19 Membership News » Rebecca Lavigne Fireside Circle members meet winemakers, swap trail tales. » p.18 On Trail Special Feature » Volunteer Geologists A look at the geologic forces that have sculpted Washington. » p.19 Maggie Brewer Feature » Pam Roy Yard work is okay, but not when it stands in the way of hiking. » p.26 Feature » Lauren Braden Not ready to pull out the tent? Check out these trailside B and B’s. » p.28 Backcountry The Gear Closet » Allison Woods Learn more about your bladder.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Guided Plant Walks
    Self-Guided Plant Walks Washington Native Plant Society Central Puget Sound Chapter Over the course of many years, the plant walks listed in this booklet provided WNPS members with interesting outings whether it be winter, spring, summer or fall. We hope these walk descriptions will encourage you to get out and explore! These walks were published on wnps.org from 1999-2011 by the Central Puget Sound Chapter and organized by month. In 2017 they were compiled into this booklet for historical use. Species names, urls, emails, directions, and trail data will not be updated. If you are interested in traveling to a site, please call the property manager (city, county, ranger station, etc.) to ensure the trail is open and passable for safe travel. To view updated species names, visit the UW Burke Herbarium Image Collection website at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/imagecollection.php. Compiled October 28, 2017 Contents February .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Discovery Park Loop - February 2011 .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Sol Duc Falls - February 2010 ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Meadowdale County Park - February
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Geologic Investigation Series I-2592, Pamphlet
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SAUK RIVER 30- BY 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R.W. Tabor, D.B. Booth, J.A. Vance, and A.B. Ford But lower, in every dip and valley, the forest is dense, of trees crowded and hugely grown, impassable with undergrowth as toughly woven as a fisherman’s net. Here and there, unnoticed until you stumble across them, are crags and bouldered screes of rock thickly clothed with thorn and creeper, invisible and deadly as a wolf trap.1 The Hollow Hills by Mary Stewart, 1973 INTRODUCTION AND Ortenburger for office and laboratory services. R.W. Tabor ACKNOWLEDGMENTS prepared the digital version of this map with considerable help from Kris Alvarez, Kathleen Duggan, Tracy Felger, Eric When Russell (1900) visited Cascade Pass in 1898, he Lehmer, Paddy McCarthy, Geoffry Phelps, Kea Umstadt, Carl began a geologic exploration which would blossom only after Wentworth, and Karen Wheeler. three-quarters of a century of growing geologic theory. The Paleontologists who helped immensely by identifying region encompassed by the Sauk River quadrangle is so struc- deformed, commonly recrystallized, and usually uninspiring turally complex that when Misch (1952) and his students fossils are Charles Blome, William Elder, Anita Harris, David began their monumental studies of the North Cascades in L. Jones, Jack W. Miller, and Kate Schindler. Chuck Blome 1948, the available geologic tools and theories were barely has been particularly helpful (see table 1). adequate to start deciphering the history. Subsequently, Bryant We thank John Whetten, Bob Zartman, and John Stacey (1955), Danner (1957), Jones (1959), Vance (1957a), Ford and his staff for unpublished U-Pb isotopic analyses (cited (1959), and Tabor (1961) sketched the fundamental outlines of in table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish County Hiking Guide
    2015- 2016 TO OUTDOOR ADVENTURE! 30 GREAT HIKES • DRIVING DIRECTIONS MAPS • ACCOMMODATIONS • LOCAL RESOURCES photo by Scott Morris PB | www.snohomish.org www.snohomish.org | 1 SCTB Print - Hiking Guide Cover 5.5” x 8.5” - Full Color 5-2015 HIKE NAME 1 Hike subtitle ROUNDTRIP m ile ELEVATION GAIN m ile HIKING SEASON m ile MAP m ile NOTES m ile DRIVING DIRECTIONS m ile CONTACT INFO m ile Hard to imagine, but one of the finest beaches River Delta. A fairly large lagoon has developed on in all of Snohomish County is just minutes from the island where you can watch for sandpipers, downtown Everett! And this two mile long sandy osprey, kingfishers, herons, finches, ducks, and expanse was created by man, not nature. Beginning more. in the 1890s, the Army Corp of Engineers built a You won’t be able to walk around the island as the jetty just north of Port Gardiner—then commenced channel side contains no beach. But the beach to dredge a channel. The spoils along with silt and on Possession Sound is wide and smooth and you sedimentation from the Snohomish River eventually can easily walk 4 to 5 miles going from tip to tip. created an island. Sand accumulated from tidal Soak up views of the Olympic Mountains; Whidbey, influences, birds arrived and nested, and plants Camano, and Gedney Islands; and downtown Everett soon colonized the island. against a backdrop of Cascades Mountains. In the 1980s the Everett Parks and Recreation Department began providing passenger ferry service to the island. Over 50,000 folks visit this sandy gem each year.
    [Show full text]