Domestication Events of Grape (Vitis Vinifera) from Antiquity and the Middle Ages in Hungary from Growers’ Viewpoint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Domestication Events of Grape (Vitis Vinifera) from Antiquity and the Middle Ages in Hungary from Growers’ Viewpoint Gábor Gyulai 1, Zoltán Tóth 1, Zoltán Szabó 1, Ferenc Gyulai 2, Richárd Lágler 1, László Kocsis 3 and László Heszky 1 Domestication Events of Grape (Vitis vinifera) from Antiquity and the Middle Ages in Hungary from Growers’ Viewpoint Morphological reconstruction of Acareosperma ; Ampelocissus ¸ in southwest Asia and southern ancient grapes ( Vitis vinifera) Ampelopsis (pepper-vine s); Cay- Transcaucasia (Armenia and based on archaeological seed ratia ; Cissus (treebine s); Clema- Georgia). Seeds of Vitaceae are remains provide insight into the ticissus ; Cyphostemma ; Leea ; easily identified from a suite of domestication and cultivation Muscadinia ; Nothocissus ; Parthe- unique and distinctive morpho- events of grapes in Hungary. nocissus ; Pterisanthes ; Ptero- logical characters (particularly a Ancient grape seeds were cissus ; Rhoicissus ; Tetrastigma ; pair of ventral in folds and a dorsal excavated at Roman and Medieval Vitis (grape s); and Yua of about chalazal scar). archaeological sites in Hungary 700 species (Facsar 1970; Terpó The wild, dioecious ancestor and analyzed by LM (Light 1976). The genus Vitis consists of form of V. vinifera ssp. silvestris Microscopy) and SEM (Scanning about 60 inter-fertile species (syn.: V. silvestris ) still co exists Electron Microscopy). Excavation including about fifteen species of with the cultivated, hermaphrodite sites included Budapest ( Aquin- agronomic importance (Table 1). flower form of V. vinifera ssp. cum ; 2 nd –4th CENT . A.D. Of them, V. vinifera (2n = 4× = 38) vinifera (syn. V. vinifera ) in Hungary) and Keszthely (Fenék- is the only species which is Eurasia and North Africa (This et puszta) of Roman Age (5 th CENT . indigenous to Eurasia, with a al . 2006). Today, thousands of A.D., Hungary); and Gyır (Ece; relatively small nuclear (nuDNA) cultivars have been developed 11 –12 th CENT . A.D., Hungary), genome size of 0.475 –0.5×10 9 which are generally classified in Debrecen (13 th CENT . A.D., DNA base pair (bp); and a 160,928 three main groups according to Hungary) and the King ’s Palace of bp of chloroplast cpDNA (Jansen their final production, as wine the Árpád Dynasty at the Castle of et al. 2006) and a regular size of grapes, table grapes including Buda, Budapest (15 th CENT . A.D., higher plant mtDNA (1 –400,000 modern seedless grapes, and Hungary) of the Middle Ages. bp) . Most genera of family raisins. Ancient seeds were compared to Vitaceae have 2n = 38 chromoso- Genetically, dioecy in wild thirty current grape varieties of mes (n = 19), but species of grape is encoded by a single gene; similar seed size, shape, and Muscadinia , Ampelocissus , female individuals are homo- morphology. The modern grape Parthenocissus , and Ampelopsis gametic carrying homozygous variety Vitis vinifera cv. ‘kék have 2n = 40 (n = 20) recessive pistil- su ppressor alleles bakator ’ ( syn .: ‘ Blue Bocca chromosomes, and species of the (su msu m) which suppress the d’Oro ’; ‘ aranybogyó ’) was found genus Cissus has 2n = 24 (n = 12) development of anthers (and most similar in seed morphology chromosomes. pollen). Male plants are hetero- to one of the ancient samples (15 th Changes in seed ( ‘pip ’) shape, zygous (SU Fsu m) carrying a CENT. Debrecen, Hungary) which wild grapes have rounder pips with dominant pistil-suppressing Su F indicates the antiquity of this short beaks, while seeds of allele. cultivar. cultivated grape tend to be more The shift, under domestication, elongated with longer beaks. Seed to bisexual (hermaphrodism) The genus Vitis morphology indicates that flowers took place via a single + domestication of grape ( Vitis mutation to SU m which is also Species of the plant family vinifera ) began with the Eurasian dominant over su resulting in two Vitaceae are woody climbers wild grape ( V. sylvestris) about genotypes of hermaphroditc grape comprising 13 –17 genera: 5,500 –5,000 B .P. (before present) types (SU +su m and SU +SU +). 1,2 Szent István University, 1Institute of Genetics and Plant Breeding, and 2KTI, Gödöllô, Hungary; 3Pannon University, Faculty of Georgikon, Keszthely, Hungary. e-mail: [email protected] 8 Hungarian Agricultural Research 2009/3 –4 Domestication events in the Table 1. Vitis species (1 –27), hybrids (1 –9) and gene bank samples genus Vitis (1 –12) The oldest (8,400 B .P.) wild Vitis species Vitis hybrids* Vitis gene bank samples 1. Vitis acerifolia 1. V. arizonica x V. rupestris 1. Vitis sp. grape ( Vitis sylvestris ) seeds 2. Vitis aestivalis 2. V. berlandieri x V. riparia 2. Vitis sp. 196-17 (about 3 mm long) were excavated 3. Vitis amurensis 3. V. berlandieri x V. 3. Vitis sp. 216-N in Turkey, at Nevali Çori (NÇ) rupestris 4. Vitis arizonica 4. V. berlandieri x V. vinifera 4. Vitis sp. 44-53M located near the Turkish city of 5. Vitis bashanica 5. V. cinerea x V. riparia 5. Vitis sp. 8007 Urfa (37 °60’N, 38 °70’E, 490 m 6. Vitis berlandieri 6. V. cinerea x V. rupestris 6. Vitis sp. 8658 above sea level) on the slope of a 7. Vitis betulifolia 7. V. labrusca x V. vinifera 7. Vitis sp. cv. 'Norton' Euphrates side valley, Hilvan 8. Vitis bryoniifolia 8. V. pseudoreticulata x V. 8. Vitis sp. CWD 96.701 vinifera province. The first convincing 9. Vitis cinerea (downy grape) 9. V. riparia x V. rupestris 9. Vitis sp. Nie 372 evidence of Vitis vinifera seeds 10. Vitis davidii 10. Vitis sp. Nie 415 with indications of grape culti- 11. Vitis flexuosa * Interspecific hybrids registered in 11. Vitis sp. NL- Hungary (2006): vation were also uncovered in 12. Vitis heyneana 12. Vitis sp. Qiu 13. Vitis kelungnsis Turkey at Kurban Höyük (5.700 – ‘Bianka’; ‘Csillám’; 14. Vitis labrusca(Concord grape) ‘Duna gyöngye’; ‘Esther’; 5.200 B.P. non-calibrated radio- 15. Vitis piasezkii ‘Fanny’; ‘Göcseji zamatos’; 16. Vitis popenoei (totoloche grape) ‘Kunleány’; ‘Medina; carbon time), followed by the early ‘Nero’; ‘Odysseus’; 17. Vitis pseudoreticulata ‘Orpheus’; ‘Platina’; Bronze Age samples (3,200 –1900 18. Vitis quinquangularis ‘Pannon frankos’; ‘Pölöskei muskotály’; 19. Vitis riparia (riverbank grape) ‘Refrén’; ‘Taurus’; B.P.) along the Jordan Valley, at 20. Vitis rotundifolia (fox grape) ‘Teréz’; ‘Viktória gyöngye’; ‘Zalagyöngye’. Tell Shuna (Jordan; Chalcoitic), 21. Vitis rupestris (rock grape) 22. Vitis shuttleworthii (callose Jericho (Cisjordan; early Bronze 23. Vitis sinocinerea Age), and Arad (Israel, early 24. Vitis thunbergii 25. Vitis tiliifolia Bronze Age) (Jacquat and 26. Vitis vinifera(wine grape) Martinoli 1999). Ancient grape 27. Vitis yeshanensis seeds were also excavated at Semma (Sudan) 3,500 B .P. Zheng He (1405 –1435), or growing in North America. Some The earliest evidence of wine Columbus voyages (first: Aug. 3 of these hybrids became resistant production (jars from Godin) was 1492 to March 15 1493; second: to Phyloxera (an insect pest), found in Iran (Hajji Firuz Tepe site Sept. 25 1493 to June 11 1495; which devastated European in the Zagros Mountains) about third: May 30 1498 to Nov. 15 vineyards in the 1880s, and 7,400 –7,000 B .P. (This et al . 1500; fourth: May 11 1502 to Nov. supplied resistant rootstocks for 2006) and 5,500 4,900 B .P. Greek, 7 1504). The first plantations in replantations. This event indicates Latin, and Egypt vine amphoras North America were established that the diversity of grape genome with gelyfied vine remains were on the West Coast by Spanish has been narrowed twice; first by found in the hulls of sunken ships missionaries and later by Hun- the Biblical sunk, similar to the famous garian viticulturists like Ágoston flood, followed by the re shipwreck remains at Uluburun Haraszty who is considered the plantation of Noah ‘the first near Kas (Turkey). Grape ‘father of California’s grape- vintner ’ (Genesis 9) on Mount cultivation gradually spread to growing industry ’. Haraszty Ararat, and second by Phyloxera Mesopotamia, Assyria, and Egypt imported 200,000 grape cuttings (This et al. 2002). Unlike the (about 5, 500–5,000 B.P.), and from Europe from 1849, including genome for dioecious V. sylvestris , further west along the grape varieties from his native genetic diversity of grape has been Mediterranean to Phoenicia, Hungary. With the passing of time, narrowing continuously as the Greece, North Africa and then to Haraszty developed over half a result of vegetative propagation the entire Roman Empire north to million California acres to either by rooting of twigs, or by Pannonia (Hungary) and German viticulture, making wine growing grafting. tribes. Viticulture also spread second to orange production in the In Hungary, the earliest wild eastward along the Silk Road and state’s agricultural economy. In grape ( Vitis sylvestris ) seed it reached China and Japan in recognition of his merits, Haraszty remains were found at Tiszapolgár 3,200 B .P. was named California’s State (5,300 B .C.) and the earliest Vitis Grape were introduced to the Commissioner of Viticulture (Sisa vinifera at Sopron (1,300 B .C.), Americas by European colonists 2006). which dates the origins of grape starting from the 16 th CENT. after European grape formed cultivations to the late Bronze Age either the early Chinese explorer hybrids with native Vitis species (Table 2, Fig. 1). Hungarian Agricultural Research 2009/3 –4 9 The earliest wine residue in Table 2. Vitis (V. sylvestris, V. vinifera and V. sp.) and wine remains Hungary dates back to 700 B .C. (at (pieces #) excavated in Hungary Fehérvárcsurgó), which places the beginnings of wine making to the Iron Age. Thus, there is evidence that both grape cultivation and wine making date to well before to the Roman period in Hungary. How to recover ancient DNA Excavated and wet-sieved sediment samples of the study presented were processed by flotation followed by seed sorting and identification in the laboratory according to Gyulai et al . (2001, 2006).
Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 29 Volume 13, December 2013 A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE MARY K. OXLEY NATURE CENTER, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Amy K. Buthod Oklahoma Biological Survey Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Robert Bebb Herbarium University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019-0575 (405) 325-4034 Email: [email protected] Keywords: flora, exotics, inventory ABSTRACT This paper reports the results of an inventory of the vascular flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma. A total of 342 taxa from 75 families and 237 genera were collected from four main vegetation types. The families Asteraceae and Poaceae were the largest, with 49 and 42 taxa, respectively. Fifty-eight exotic taxa were found, representing 17% of the total flora. Twelve taxa tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory were present. INTRODUCTION clayey sediment (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1977). Climate is Subtropical The objective of this study was to Humid, and summers are humid and warm inventory the vascular plants of the Mary K. with a mean July temperature of 27.5° C Oxley Nature Center (ONC) and to prepare (81.5° F). Winters are mild and short with a a list and voucher specimens for Oxley mean January temperature of 1.5° C personnel to use in education and outreach. (34.7° F) (Trewartha 1968). Mean annual Located within the 1,165.0 ha (2878 ac) precipitation is 106.5 cm (41.929 in), with Mohawk Park in northwestern Tulsa most occurring in the spring and fall County (ONC headquarters located at (Oklahoma Climatological Survey 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Sequences of Both Organelles of the Grapevine Rootstock Cultivar ‘Börner’
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.18.996405; this version posted March 19, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Genome sequences of both organelles of the grapevine rootstock cultivar ‘Börner’ 2 3 Bianca Frommera, Daniela Holtgräwea, Ludger Hausmannb, Prisca Viehövera, Bruno 4 Hüttelc, Reinhard Töpferb, Bernd Weisshaara# 5 6 aBielefeld University, Chair of Genetics and Genomics of Plants, Faculty of Biology & 7 Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld, Germany 8 bJulius Kühn-Institute, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, Siebeldingen, 9 Germany 10 cMax Planck Genome Centre Cologne, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding 11 Research, Cologne, Germany 12 13 Running Head: Organellar sequences of the Vitis rootstock 'Börner' 14 15 # Address correspondence to Bernd Weisshaar, [email protected] 16 17 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.18.996405; this version posted March 19, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 18 Abstract 19 Genomic long reads of the interspecific grapevine rootstock cultivar ‘Börner’ (Vitis riparia 20 GM183 x Vitis cinerea Arnold) were used to assemble its chloroplast and mitochondrion 21 genome sequences. We annotated 133 chloroplast and 172 mitochondrial genes 22 including the RNA-editing sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Canopy Collection and Identification of Grapevines (Vitis) from Selected Forests in the Southeastern United States Sydney E
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Plant Pathology Plant Pathology Department 2010 Upper Canopy Collection and Identification of Grapevines (Vitis) from Selected Forests in the Southeastern United States Sydney E. Everhart University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/plantpathpapers Part of the Other Plant Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Plant Pathology Commons Everhart, Sydney E., "Upper Canopy Collection and Identification of Grapevines (Vitis) from Selected Forests in the Southeastern United States" (2010). Papers in Plant Pathology. 364. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/plantpathpapers/364 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant Pathology Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Plant Pathology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CASTANEA 75(1): 141–149. MARCH 2010 Upper Canopy Collection and Identification of Grapevines (Vitis) from Selected Forests in the Southeastern United States Sydney E. Everhart* Department of Biology and Earth Science, University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, Missouri 64093 ABSTRACT Woody grapevines (Vitis spp.) are common in the deciduous forests of the southeastern United States. Their growth habit makes leaf collection challenging and polymorphic leaves make identification of species difficult. Mature grapevines can grow up to 48 cm in diameter at breast height and reach the upper canopy of trees more than 35 m in height. Leaf morphology is the most readily available character used for species identification. However, most mature grapevines do not produce leaves below the upper canopy and if they do, these leaves are morphologically indistinguishable from other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouriensis Volume 28 / 29
    Missouriensis Volume 28/29 (2008) In this issue: Improved Status of Auriculate False Foxglove (Agalinis auriculata) in Missouri in 2007 Tim E. Smith, Tom Nagel, and Bruce Schuette ......................... 1 Current Status of Yellow False Mallow (Malvastrum hispidum) in Missouri Tim E. Smith.................................................................................... 5 Heliotropium europaeum (Heliotropiaceae) New to Missouri Jay A. Raveill and George Yatskievych ..................................... 10 Melica mutica (Poaceae) New for the Flora of Missouri Alan E. Brant ................................................................................. 18 Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae) New to Missouri Timothy E. Vogt and Paul M. McKenzie ................................. 22 Flora of Galloway Creek Nature Park, Howell County, Missouri Bill Summers .................................................................................. 27 Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society Missouriensis, Volume 28/29 2008 1 IMPROVED STATUS OF AURICULATE FALSE FOXGLOVE (AGALINIS AURICULATA) IN MISSOURI IN 2007 Tim E. Smith Missouri Department of Conservation P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0180 Tom Nagel Missouri Department of Conservation 701 James McCarthy Drive St. Joseph, MO 64507-2194 Bruce Schuette Missouri Department of Natural Resources Cuivre River State Park 678 State Rt. 147 Troy, MO 63379 Populations of annual plant species are known to have periodic “boom” and “bust” years as well as years when plant numbers more closely approach long-term averages. In tracking populations of plant species of conservation concern (Missouri Natural Heritage Program, 2007), there are sometimes also boom years in the number of reports of new populations. Because of reports of five new populations and a surge in numbers of plants at some previously-known sites, 2007 provided encouraging news for the conservation of the auriculate false foxglove [Agalinis auriculata (Michx.) Blake] in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitis Riparia
    OPTIMISATION OF SUSTAINABILITY OF GRAPEVINE VARIETIES BY SELECTING ROOTSTOCK VARIETIES UNDER DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND CREATING NEW ROOTSTOCK VARIETIES Joachim Schmid, Frank Manty, Ernst Rühl Geisenheim University Institut for Grapevine Breeding Joachim Schmid Entrance to UNESCO world heritage site Rüdesheim Joachim Schmid 16.01.2015Titel der 2 Präsentation Joachim Schmid • Rootstock breeding and the use of rootstocks is the result and the answer to the introduction of phylloxera • All present rootstocks are hybrids of wild Vitis species with specific characteristics Titel der Präsentation Joachim Schmid 16.01.2015 4 VITIS RIPARIA Advantages Phylloxera tolerant very high frost resistance (<‐40°C) early bud break, early ripening good rooting ability Disadvantages susceptible to drought Low lime tolerance Joachim Schmid 5 VITIS BERLANDIERI Advantages Phylloxera tolerant high lime tolerance salt tolerant medium to good drought tolerance Disadvantages poor rooting ability late ripening Joachim Schmid 6 VITIS RUPESTRIS Advantages Phylloxera tolerant good rooting ability average lime tolerance good drought tolerance – but susceptible on shallow soils Disadvantages low vigour (in the motherblock) early bud break Joachim Schmid 7 VITIS CINEREA Advantages Phylloxera resistant good drought tolerance Disadvantages poor rooting ability low lime tolerance late bud break Joachim Schmid 8 ROOTSTOCK BREEDERS IN HUNGARY, AUSRTRIA AND GERMANY Sigmund TELEKI (1854‐1910) & Franz KOBER (1864‐1943) Vitis berlandieri x Vitis riparia • Teleki 8
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Survey of the Genus Vitis L. (Vitaceae) in Italy, with Special Reference to Elba Island (Tuscan Archipelago)
    Phytotaxa 166 (3): 163–198 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Article PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.166.3.1 A taxonomic survey of the genus Vitis L. (Vitaceae) in Italy, with special reference to Elba Island (Tuscan Archipelago) NICOLA M.G. ARDENGHI1, GABRIELE GALASSO2, ENRICO BANFI3, ANTONIO ZOCCOLA4, BRUNO FOGGI5 & LORENZO LASTRUCCI6 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via S. Epifanio 14, 27100, Pavia, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 2Sezione di Botanica, Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 3Sezione di Botanica, Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 4Ufficio territoriale per la Biodiversità, Corpo Forestale dello Stato, Via Alighieri 41, 52015 Pratovecchio (Arezzo), Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Biology-Plant Biology, University of Florence, Via La Pira 4, 50121 Florence, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 6Department of Biology-Plant Biology, University of Florence, Via La Pira 4, 50121 Florence, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract As resulted from recent floristic investigations conducted in southern and central Europe, the genus Vitis proved to be, in these areas, an intricate critical group, whose interpretation, often influenced by ampelographic approaches, needed to be clarified in a strict taxonomic sense. The current paper analyzes the taxonomy and the distribution of seven taxa recorded in Italy and assigns new names to three nothospecies, naturalized and/or invasive in additional European countries: V.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Checklist of the Terrestrial Flora and Fauna of Fern Cave
    Preliminary Checklist of the Terrestrial Flora and Fauna of Fern Cave National Wildlife Refuge ______________________________________________ Prepared for: United States Fish & Wildlife Service Prepared by: J. Kevin England, MAT David Richardson, MS Completed: as of 22 Sep 2019 All rights reserved. Phone: 256-565-4933 Email: [email protected] Flora & Fauna of FCNWR2 ABSTRACT I.) Total Biodiversity Data The main objective of this study was to inventory and document the total biodiversity of terrestrial habitats located at Fern Cave National Wildlife Refuge (FCNWR). Table 1. Total Biodiversity of Fern Cave National Wildlife Refuge, Jackson Co., AL, USA Level of Classification Families Genera Species Lichens and Allied Fungi 14 21 28 Bryophytes (Bryophyta, Anthocerotophyta, Marchantiophyta) 7 9 9 Vascular Plants (Tracheophytes) 76 138 176 Insects (Class Insecta) 9 9 9 Centipedes (Class Chilopoda) 1 1 1 Millipedes (Class Diplopoda) 2 3 3 Amphibians (Class Amphibia) 3 4 5 Reptiles (Class Reptilia) 2 3 3 Birds (Class Aves) 1 1 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 2 2 2 Total 117 191 237 II. Vascular Flora (Appendix 3) Methods and Materials To compile a thorough vascular flora survey, several examples of different plant communities at numerous sites were visited and sampled during the study. Approximately 45 minutes was spent documenting community structure at each site. Lastly, all habitats, ecological systems, and plant associations found within the property boundaries were defined based on floristic content, soil characteristics (soil maps) and other abiotic factors. Flora & Fauna of FCNWR3 The most commonly used texts for specimen identification in this study were Flora of North America (1993+), Mohr (1901), Radford et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama
    The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama T. Wayne Barger1* and Brian D. Holt1 1Alabama State Lands Division, Natural Heritage Section, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Montgomery, AL 36130 *Correspondence: wayne [email protected] Abstract provides public lands for recreational use along with con- servation of vital habitat. Since its inception, the Forever The Red Hills Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) is a 1785 ha Wild Program, managed by the Alabama Department of property that was acquired in two purchases by the State of Conservation and Natural Resources (AL-DCNR), has pur- Alabama Forever Wild Program in February and Septem- chased approximately 97 500 ha (241 000 acres) of land for ber 2010. The RHFWT is characterized by undulating general recreation, nature preserves, additions to wildlife terrain with steep slopes, loblolly pine plantations, and management areas and state parks. For each Forever Wild mixed hardwood floodplain forests. The property lies tract purchased, a management plan providing guidelines 125 km southwest of Montgomery, AL and is managed by and recommendations for the tract must be in place within the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural a year of acquisition. The 1785 ha (4412 acre) Red Hills Resources with an emphasis on recreational use and habi- Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) was acquired in two sepa- tat management. An intensive floristic study of this area rate purchases in February and September 2010, in part was conducted from January 2011 through June 2015. A to provide protected habitat for the federally listed Red total of 533 taxa (527 species) from 323 genera and 120 Hills Salamander (Phaeognathus hubrichti Highton).
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Geometry in the Vitaceae
    plants Review Seed Geometry in the Vitaceae Emilio Cervantes 1,* , José Javier Martín-Gómez 1 , Diego Gutiérrez del Pozo 2 and Ángel Tocino 3 1 Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IRNASA-CSIC), Cordel de Merinas, 40, 37008 Salamanca, Spain; [email protected] 2 Departamento de Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre (CYMVIS), Universidad Estatal Amazónica (UEA), Carretera Tena a Puyo Km, 44, Puyo 150950, Ecuador; [email protected] 3 Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Salamanca, Plaza de la Merced 1-4, 37008 Salamanca, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Vitaceae Juss., in the basal lineages of Rosids, contains sixteen genera and 950 species, mainly of tropical lianas. The family has been divided in five tribes: Ampelopsideae, Cisseae, Cayratieae, Parthenocisseae and Viteae. Seed shape is variable in this family. Based on new models derived from equations representing heart and water drop curves, we describe seed shape in species of the Vitaceae. According to their similarity to geometric models, the seeds of the Vitaceae have been classified in ten groups. Three of them correspond to models before described and shared with the Arecaceae (lenses, superellipses and elongated water drops), while in the seven groups remaining, four correspond to general models (waterdrops, heart curves, elongated heart curves and other elongated models) and three adjust to the silhouettes of seeds in particular genera (heart curves of Cayratia and Pseudocayratia, heart curves of the Squared Heart Curve (SqHC) type of Ampelocissus and Ampelopsis and Elongated Superellipse-Heart Curves (ESHCs), frequent in Tetrastigma species and observed also in Cissus species and Rhoicissus rhomboidea).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Ampelocissus–Vitis Clade in Vitaceae Supports the New World Origin of the Grape Genus
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution xxx (2015) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of the Ampelocissus–Vitis clade in Vitaceae supports the New World origin of the grape genus q ⇑ Xiu-Qun Liu a, Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond b, Ze-Long Nie c, Zhuo Zhou d, Long-Qing Chen a, Jun Wen e, a Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), College of Horticulture and Forestry Science, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China b UA Museum of the North Herbarium and Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-6960, USA c Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Utilization, College of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China d Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China e Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, MRC166, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA article info abstract Article history: The grapes and the close allies in Vitaceae are of great agronomic and economic importance. Our previous Received 10 November 2014 studies showed that the grape genus Vitis was closely related to three tropical genera, which formed the Revised 31 July 2015 Ampelocissus–Vitis clade (including Vitis, Ampelocissus, Nothocissus and Pterisanthes). Yet the phylogenetic Accepted 13 October 2015 relationships of the four genera within this clade remain poorly resolved. Furthermore, the geographic Available online xxxx origin of Vitis is still controversial, because the sampling of the close relatives of Vitis was too limited in the previous studies.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT WEST, AMANDA MARIE. Biology and Management Of
    ABSTRACT WEST, AMANDA MARIE. Biology and Management of Bushkiller (Cayratia japonica). (Under the direction of Robert J. Richardson). Bushkiller [Cayratia japonica (Thunb.) Gagnep] is a nonnative invasive perennial vine in the Vitaceae family that was identified in North Carolina in 2005. Concern of potential economic and environmental consequences of this introduction prompted research to be conducted at North Carolina State University evaluating bushkiller biology and management. A risk assessment was prepared following the USDA‐APHIS template entitled “Weed‐Initiated Pest Risk Assessment Guidelines for Qualitative Assessments”, v. 5.3. Phenotypic plasticity, rapid growth rate, persistence of underground rhizomes, lack of natural control agents, stress tolerance, increasing costs of control, impacts on ecosystem function and structure, and societal impacts are some of the characteristics that yielded a medium‐high risk potential for bushkiller, emphasizing it should be listed at the Federal level, the state level (NC), or both. Selected herbicides were evaluated to develop bushkiller control recommendations. In greenhouse study 1 at 4 WAT, triclopyr (2.24 or 4.5 kg ae/ha), triclopyr plus 2,4‐D (1.12 and 1.12 kg ae/ha), triclopyr plus 2,4‐D plus aminopyralid (1.12, 1.12, and 0.12 kg ae/ha), and triclopyr plus glyphosate (1.12 and 1.12 kg ae/ha) controlled bushkiller 100%. In greenhouse study 2 at 4 WAT, 2,4‐D (1.12 kg ae/ha), DPX‐KJM44 (0.35 kg ae/ha), DPX‐KJM44 plus 2,4‐D (0.35 and 1.12 kg ae/ha), sulfometuron plus DPX‐KJM44 (0.33 and 0.35 kg ae/ha), and sulfometuron plus imazapyr (0.33 and 1.68 kg ae/ha) controlled bushkiller at least 98%.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Checklist of Plants: Balcones Canyonlands
    CHECKLIST OF PLANTS: BALCONES CANYONLANDS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE September 24, 2008 Note : Species marked with an asterisk (*) are endemic to Texas (most often confined to just Central Texas or the Edwards Plateau). (I) indicates introduced (non-native) species. Species in square [brackets] are found on lands immediately adjacent to the Refuge and might be expected within the Refuge boundary. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME ACANTHACEAE ACANTHUS FAMILY Dyschoriste linearis Narrowleaf dyschoriste, Snake herb Justicia americana American water-willow *Ruellia drummondiana *Drummond wild-petunia Ruellia humilis Low wild-petunia Ruellia metziae Common wild-petunia Ruellia nudiflora var. nudiflora Common wild-petunia Siphonoglossa pilosella Tube-tongue ACERACEAE MAPLE FAMILY Acer negundo Box-elder AGAVACEAE AGAVE FAMILY *Nolina lindheimeriana *Devil's shoestring Nolina texana Sacahuista Yucca arkansana Arkansas yucca Yucca constricta Buckley yucca *Yucca rupicola *Twist-leaf yucca Yucca treculeana Trecul yucca AMARANTHACEAE AMARANTH FAMILY Alternanthera caracasana Mat chaff-flower Amaranthus albus White amaranth Amaranthus palmeri Palmer's amaranth Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot pigweed Amaranthus sp. Amaranth Froelichia gracilis Snake-cotton ANACARDIACEAE SUMAC FAMILY Rhus lanceolata Flameleaf sumac Rhus trilobata var. trilobata Fragrant sumac, skunkbush Rhus virens Evergreen sumac Toxicodendron radicans Poison ivy (prob. 2 vars.) APIACEAE (= Umbelliferae) CARROT FAMILY Bifora americana Prairie bishop Bowlesia incana Hoary bowlesia Centella erecta
    [Show full text]