Access/Checkpoint Issu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Access/Checkpoint Issu 1325_INDEX 11/30/07 1:16 PM Page 1103 310-567/B428-S/11005 Index References are to document numbers Abrasimov, Pyotr A., 54, 261 Acheson, Dean—Continued Bundesversammlung in West Berlin, Ostpolitik, 143, 146, 149, 150, 155 2 Soviet-U.S. relations, 254 Four Power talks/negotiations on Ackerson, Col. Frederick, 279 Berlin: Adenauer, Konrad, 164, 335 Access/checkpoint issues, 293, 295 Adzhubei, Alexei, 138 Acrimonious discussions between Africa, 335 Soviet-British-French Agnew, Spiro T., 6, 126 ambassadors, 291 Agriculture, 335 Agreement (final), 327, 329 Ahlers, Conrad, 15, 16, 79, 115, 154, 254 Agreement (tentative), 281, 296 Akalovsky, Alexander, 212, 214, 270, 323 Air corridors to Berlin closed, 121 Albania, 335 Ambassadorial meetings, Allott, Gordon, 196 December 11, 1970, 144 Alphand, Hervé, 153 Ambassadorial meetings, May 25, Alsop, Joseph R., Jr., 22 1971, 242 Anderson, David, 362 Ambassadorial meetings, August Apollo missions: 10-12, 1971, 284, 286, 287 11, 22 Ambassadorial meetings, August 12, 44 16-18, 1971, 293, 295 13, 78 Draft agreement, Soviet, 210, 215, Arabs. See Middle East. 222 Arendt, Walter, 150 Draft agreement, Western, 242 Argentina, 336 Kissinger-Dobrynin meetings, 152, Ash, Roy L., 378 168 Audland, Christopher J., 199 Kissinger-Ehmke meetings, 151 Austria, 372 Kissinger’s assessments, 166 Nixon-Soviet leadership Bahr, Egon, 44, 228 communications, 166 Brandt, no-confidence motion Passport issues, 281, 296 submitted against, 358 Private negotiation channels, 207, Brandt’s review of global affairs, 208, 210, 211, 212, 214, 215, 255 217, 221, 226, 227 Four Power talks/negotiations on Rush, meetings with, 114, 251, 281 Berlin (see also Bahr-Kohl Rush-Bahr-Falin meetings, 243, 263 (Michael) parallel negotiations Rush’s assessments, 122, 196 and Rush-Bahr-Falin meetings Sonnenfeldt’s assessments, 170 under Four Power talks/ Soviet presence in West Berlin, 250, negotiations on Berlin): 270, 272, 281, 284, 295 Access/checkpoint issues, 188, 210, Paris, assignment to, 230 224, 264, 266, 292 Access/checkpoint issues in Berlin (see Agreement (final), 329, 349 also under Four Power talks/ Agreement (tentative), 271, 274, negotiations on Berlin), 33, 34 275, 277, 308, 313 Acheson, Dean, 133 Ambassadorial meetings, Four Power talks/negotiations on November 17–18, 1970, 137 Berlin, 149 Ambassadorial meetings, May Nixon, meetings with, 140 17–18, 1971, 239, 240 1103 1325_INDEX 11/30/07 1:16 PM Page 1104 310-567/B428-S/11005 1104 Index Bahr, Egon—Continued Bahr, Egon—Continued Four Power talks/negotiations on Four Power talks/negotiations on Berlin—Continued Berlin—Continued Ambassadorial meetings, August Sonnenfeldt’s assessments, 222, 381 10–12, 1971, 287 Soviet presence in West Berlin, 230, Assessments conveyed to U.S. State 257, 274 Department, 67 Tactics for the wrap-up Backchannel discussions between ambassadorial meetings, 270 Kissinger/Rush/Bahr, 171, Traffic issues, 182, 183, 264, 265, 266 172, 183, 187 Non-Proliferation Treaty, 36 Brandt’s trip to U.S., 80 North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Central Intelligence Agency’s 36, 140 assessments, 87, 146, 150 Ostpolitik (see also Treaty listings Draft agreement, Soviet, 215, 224, below): 230, 234, 235 Assessments conveyed to European alliance/unity, 68 Kissinger, 134 Falin, communications with, 210 Brandt’s U.S. trip, 79 Falin, meetings with, 157 Central Intelligence Agency’s Fazio, meetings with, 168 assessments, 146, 150, 164 Federal presence in Berlin, West Ehmke’s trip to U.S. (proposed), 150 German, 174, 224, 243, 248, Gromyko, meetings with, 74, 79, 249, 264, 265, 266 85, 91 Fessenden-Sahm meetings, 154 Hillenbrand, meetings with, 107 Gromyko, meetings with, 59, 68, Kissinger, communications with, 70, 84 85, 102 Hillenbrand, meetings with, 107 Kissinger, meetings with, 76, 108 Kissinger, communications with, Kissinger, meetings with 102, 167, 168, 192, 215, 249, (proposed), 222 264, 265, 275, 308, 349 Kissinger-Sonnenfeldt Kissinger, meetings with, 224, 226, communications, 146 257 New York Times, coverage of, 151 Kissinger, meetings with Rush, meetings with, 91 (proposed), 222 Rush’s assessments, 92 Kissinger-Dobrynin meetings, 178, Sonnenfeldt’s assessments, 222 183, 262 Sonnenfeldt’s European trip, 89 Kissinger-Rush communications, Soviet officials, meetings with, 138, 210, 263, 265, 266, 270, 271, 141 274, 277 Renunciation-of-force agreements, 56, Leaking information, 243 97 Legal formula as to status, 226, Soviet-East German relations, 36 228, 235 Soviet-U.S. relations, 330, 331 Linkage between Berlin settlement Soviet-West German relations: and other issues, 83 Brandt upgrades negotiations with National Security Council’s Soviets, 50 assessments, 139 Gromyko, meetings with, 61, 68 Nixon, communications with, 236, Kissinger, communications with, 50 237, 238 Kissinger, meetings with, 36 Nixon-Brandt meetings, 254 Moscow trip (actual), 55 Rights/responsibilities, four power, Moscow trip (proposed), 51 374, 381, 382 Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, 80, Rush, development of the 108, 243 relationship with, 210 Treaty of Moscow (1970): Rush, meetings with, 97, 141, 229, Barzel’s request for U.S. assistance, 251 359 References are to document numbers 1325_INDEX 11/30/07 1:16 PM Page 1105 310-567/B428-S/11005 Index 1105 Bahr, Egon—Continued Barzel, Rainer—Continued Treaty of Moscow (1970)—Continued Four Power talks/negotiations on Bundesrat in West Germany votes Berlin: against, 344, 345 Access/checkpoint issues, 219 Dean, communications with, 344 Agreement (final), 328 Embassy (U.S.) in Germany, Agreement (tentative), 275 assessments by, 354 Assessments conveyed to U.S. State Kissinger, communications with, Department, 69 330, 352 Brandt, meetings with, 275 Kissinger, meetings with, 348, Brandt, rift between Barzel and, 353 188, 189 Kissinger, meetings with Draft agreement, Western, 189 (proposed), 345 Federal presence in Berlin, West Lednev, meetings with, 353 German, 219 Media, statements to the, 348 Hillenbrand, meetings with, 384 Rogers’ trip to Bonn, 365 Kissinger, meetings with, 115, Sonnenfeldt’s assessments, 345 219 Vietnam linked to, 350 Rights/responsibilities, four power, Treaty of Warsaw (1970), 141 384 Barzel’s request for U.S. assistance, Rush, meetings with, 179, 220, 251, 359 328 Embassy (U.S.) in Germany, Nixon, meetings with: assessments by, 354 Four Power talks/negotiations on Kissinger, communications with, Berlin, 218, 220 352 Ostpolitik, 218, 220 Kissinger, meetings with, 348, Rush-Barzel meetings, 220 353 Treaty of Moscow (1970), 338 Kissinger, meetings with Treaty of Warsaw (1970), 338 (proposed), 345 Nixon’s election victory over George Lednev, meetings with, 353 McGovern, 384 Media, statements to the, 348 Ostpolitik (see also Treaty listings Nixon-Brandt communications, below): 158 Assessments conveyed to U.S. State Rogers’ trip to Bonn, 365 Department, 69 Troop (U.S.) commitment in Europe, Christian Democratic Union’s 36, 108 concerns, 72 United Nations, German membership Kissinger, meetings with, 115 in the, 373 Kissinger-Sonnenfeldt U.S. visit (proposed), controversy communications, 103 over, 28 Nixon, meetings with, 218, 220 Vietnam, 352 Opposition to, 86 Voting rights of Berlin deputies in the Rush, meetings with, 179 Bundestag, 30, 36 Treaty of Moscow (1970): West-East German relations, 40, 43, Dean, meetings with, 116, 220 369, 371 Embassy (U.S.) in Germany, Baker, John A., Jr., 147 assessments by, 354 Ball, George, 161 Kissinger, meetings with, 115, Bartholomew, Reginald, 111 219 Barzel, Rainer, 318, 329, 335 Nixon, meetings with, 338 Brandt, attempts to unseat, 86 Soviet Union, trip to the, 338 Brandt, no-confidence motion U.S. assistance, request for, 359, submitted against, 357, 358 362, 363 Elections (1972) between Brandt and, Vietnam linked to, 116, 220, 338, 378, 380, 385 367 References are to document numbers 1325_INDEX 11/30/07 1:16 PM Page 1106 310-567/B428-S/11005 1106 Index Barzel, Rainer—Continued Berlin—Continued Treaty of Warsaw (1970): Christian Democratic Union/ Embassy (U.S.) in Germany, Christian Social Union meeting assessments by, 354 in Berlin, 137 Kissinger, meetings with, 219 Contingency planning on, review of, Nixon, meetings with, 338 34 U.S. assistance, request for, 359, Dobrynin-Rogers meetings, 8 362, 363 Four Power talks accepted, 54 Vietnam linked to, 338, 367 Kissinger-Dobrynin meetings, 17 West-East German relations, 384 Kissinger-Helms communications, 12 Bauer, Leo, 92 Kissinger-Laird communications, 12 Beam, Jacob D., 19, 21, 54, 102, 170 Kissinger-Rogers communications, 12 Belgium, 336 Military traffic (U.S.) over the Berg, Hermann von, 43, 60 Autobahn to and from West Bergsten, C. Fred, 89 Berlin, 12 Beria, Lavrenti, 343 National Security Council’s Berlin (see also Four Power talks/ assessments, 18, 34 negotiations on Berlin; Nixon-Dobrynin meetings, 11 Ostpolitik): Nixon-Kiesinger meetings, 15, 16 Abrasimov-Lodge meetings, 2 Nixon-Kissinger communications, 26, Access/checkpoint issues, 33, 34 42 Air corridors closed, 121 Nixon-Kosygin communications, 19 Allied probe on Berlin: a status Nixon’s trip to West Berlin, 17 report, 47 Rogers’ assessments, 42 Bundestag convening in West Berlin, Social Democratic Party holding Soviet protests over, 48 meetings in, 148 Bundesversammlung (Federal State Department (U.S.) and White Convention) in West Berlin: House, confusion between, 32 Abrasimov-Lodge meetings, 2 Transitional arrangements, 20 Brandt-Rusk communications, 3 Travel restrictions to, 1 Kiesinger-Tsarapkin meetings, 13 Tripartite aide-mémoire to Soviets, 47 Kissinger-Dobrynin Voting rights
Recommended publications
  • Bulletin of the GHI Washington Supplement 1 (2004)
    Bulletin of the GHI Washington Supplement 1 (2004) Copyright Das Digitalisat wird Ihnen von perspectivia.net, der Online-Publikationsplattform der Max Weber Stiftung – Stiftung Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland, zur Verfügung gestellt. Bitte beachten Sie, dass das Digitalisat urheberrechtlich geschützt ist. Erlaubt ist aber das Lesen, das Ausdrucken des Textes, das Herunterladen, das Speichern der Daten auf einem eigenen Datenträger soweit die vorgenannten Handlungen ausschließlich zu privaten und nicht-kommerziellen Zwecken erfolgen. Eine darüber hinausgehende unerlaubte Verwendung, Reproduktion oder Weitergabe einzelner Inhalte oder Bilder können sowohl zivil- als auch strafrechtlich verfolgt werden. OSTPOLITIK:PHASES,SHORT-TERM OBJECTIVES, AND GRAND DESIGN Gottfried Niedhart I International history in the late 1960s and early 1970s was shaped by an enormous amount of worldwide conflict and change.1 It was a period of transition in many respects. Although the superpowers were still unri- valled in military power, China, Japan, and Europe emerged as new centers of power, heralding a new multipolar structure. There was also the crisis and end of the Bretton Woods system, as well as the protest movements of the 68ers in many countries.2 As for East-West relations, both the United States of America and the Soviet Union were interested in relaxing tensions. Neither side could achieve superiority. Furthermore, the events in Vietnam (the Tet offensive in January 1968), Eastern Europe (the questioning of Moscow’s control by Romania and Czechoslovakia), East Asia (the Soviet-Chinese clash over the Ussuri border), and the Middle East (the Israeli-Arab conflict) marked the limits of American and Soviet power and the dangers of imperial overstretch.
    [Show full text]
  • "Ostpolitik As a Source of Intra-Bloc Tensions" by Dr
    1 "Ostpolitik as a source of intra-bloc tensions" by Dr. Oliver Bange, Mannheim University (Project "Ostpolitik and Détente") [Ostpolitik caused friction on a number of different levels – it sparked tensions within Willy Brand’s party, the SPD, parliament, the coalition cabinet, tensions with the Western allies, and even within the Eastern bloc. It is the latter two that this paper is devoted, arranging documents from various national archives around nine distinct but interconnected arguments. Inevitably, such a vue d’ensemble has to start with an explanation of the goals and tactics underlying the new Eastern policy as devised during Brandt’s time as foreign minister of the “Grand Coalition” from December 1966 to September 1969, and put into practice during his chancellorship of the social-liberal coalition until 1974 and then onwards to the CSCE in Helsinki on August 1, 1975.] One might compare the "Neue Ostpolitik" of Willy Brandt and Egon Bahr with a coin: the currency, or ultimate goal, imprinted on it is called "unification" – in order to avoid any compromise to the original borders of the vanished Reich, Brandt refused to speak about "re- unification", preferring the "unification" or "Zusammenwachsen" (growing closer) of the two existing German states. The two sides of the coin represent two long-term strategies to achieve unification. Undermining Communism by exposing the people under its rule to Western values and liberties was one side of the coin. However, the eventual breakdown of Communism itself would not guarantee German unification. The other side of the coin was therefore to devise an all-European security system, taking care of the legitimate security concerns of all nations (including the United States and the Soviet Union) concerned by a prospective unification of the two German states.
    [Show full text]
  • MASARYK UNIVERSITY Willy Brandt and His Role in the Cold
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Department of International Relations and European Studies Willy Brandt and his role in the Cold War Diploma thesis Tomáš Kolár Supervisor: doc. PhDr. Vít Hloušek, Ph. D. UČO: 251550 Field of study: European studies Immatriculation year: 2011 Košice, 2013 Hereby I declare that I have written this thesis by myself, drawing only on the cited sources. In Košice, December 15, 2013 ............................. First of all, I would like to kindly thank doc. PhDr. Vít Hloušek, Ph.D., for his enthusiasm, support, guidance, valuable comments and remarks. Table of content List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 5 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2 The development of the divided Germany in the context of the Cold War after WWII till 1961 ...... 11 2.1 Development in the GDR ............................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Development in the FRG ............................................................................................................ 13 2.3 Konrad Adenauerʼs era (1949-1963) .......................................................................................... 14 2.3 Berlin wall and its consequences ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The British Reaction Towards Ostpolitik. Anglo-West German Relations in the Era of Détente 1967-1971
    The British Reaction towards Ostpolitik. Anglo-West German Relations in the Era of Détente 1967-1971 Gottfried Niedhart In the late 1960s a new term was added to the list of the few German expressions well known internationally and particularly in the English speaking world. Ostpolitik stood for the new attitude and policy of the Federal Republic of Germany towards the Warsaw Pact states. Great Britain underwent a period of adaptation to international realities too. It applied for membership of the European Communities. Both the Federal Republic and Great Britain were newcomers: the Germans in Eastern and the British in Western Europe. Both could support each other in their respective fields. Hence Anglo-German relations entered a new period shaped by common views and interests. The Federal Republic, contrary to de Gaulle’s France, welcomed the British turn towards Europe. Great Britain regarded the West German acceptance of the existing borders in Europe as overdue. This is the background which one has to take into account before dealing more specifically with the British assessment of the Federal Republic’s role in East- West relations and of the implications of Ostpolitik. Furthermore, one should have in mind that British policy makers and experts in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO)1 as well as people in the media perceived Ostpolitik not only as a new start in the relations between the Federal Republic and Eastern Europe but also as an indicator of a new self-confidence of the West German foreign policy establishment and of a more active role of the Federal Republic in international affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Concerning Germany's “Ostpolitik”' from L'europe En Formation from L
    ‘Concerning Germany’s “Ostpolitik”’ from L’Europe en Formation from L'Europe en Formation (May 1971) Caption: In its May 1971 issue, the federalist journal L’Europe en Formation identifies both the positive effects of and the threats posed by the Ostpolitik pursued by the German Chancellor, Willy Brandt. Source: L'Europe en formation. dir. de publ. Marc, Alexandre ; Réd. Chef Marc-Lipiansky, Arnaud. Mai 1971, n° 134. Nice: Presses d'Europe. "A propos de l'Ostpolitik", auteur:Kinsky, Ferdinand , p. 14-15. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/concerning_germany_s_ostpolitik_from_l_europe_en_form ation_from_l_europe_en_formation_may_1971-en-94840c13-eed5-4b26-b070- 97262477ba42.html Last updated: 05/07/2016 1/3 Concerning Germany’s ‘Ostpolitik’ by Ferdinand Kinsky The political debate that has been raging in Germany for the past year, on the subject of the ‘Ostpolitik’, has not always been amicable and has, on occasion, been quite violent. ‘Rapallo’, ‘Germany sold out to the East’, the ‘FRG will soon be a People’s Democracy’, ‘High Treason’, are some of the slogans bandied about by opponents of the policies of Chancellor Willy Brandt, to which the pro-government lobby reply by claiming his policy to be ‘realistic’, ‘peace-loving’ and ‘European’. A more tempered analysis, devoid of wild slogans, would have to decide whether the Ostpolitik represents an alternative to a European policy or whether, on the contrary, it may be considered as a constructive part of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Mw Report 2004-2005
    Final Report - Manfred Wörner Fellowship 2004 / 2005 Prospects For Regional Cooperation on NATO’s South Eastern Border Developing a Turkish-Russian Cooperation in South Caucasus Submitted on 30 June 2005 By Dr. Burcu Gültekin Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris Turkish-Armenian Business Development Council In consultation with the Economy & Conflict Research Group of South Caucasus (ECRG) / International Alert 1 Acknowledgments This report has been possible thanks to NATO’s Manfred Wörner fellowship. I am profoundly grateful to the Public Diplomacy Division at NATO Headquarters, notably to Deputy Assistant Secretary General for External Relations Dr. Jamie Shea and to Dr. Stefanie Babst, Head of NATO Countries Section. My special thanks go to Despina Afentouli, Information Officer Greece and responsible for South Caucasus, whose friendly support has been particularly valuable throughout all the research process, and to Ioanna Synadino. I have benefited from conversations with Robert Simmons, Deputy Assistant Secretary General for Security Cooperation and Partnership and with Amb. Daniel Speckhard, Director of Policy Planning at the Office of the Secretary General. My deep thanks go to Ünal Çeviköz, Ambassador of Turkey to Bagdat, who has actively supported my work on the South Caucasus for many years and to Ertan Tezgör, Ambassador of Turkey to Tbilisi for his continuous help and multiple in-depth discussions during my research in Tbilisi. Brigadier General Muzaffer Çarpan, Turkish Armed Forces Attaché at the Turkish Embassy in Tbilisi, David Sikarulidze, Deputy Minister of Defense of Georgia and General Melkunian from the Ministry of Defense of Armenia have been gracious with their time and insights. I am grateful to Henry Cuny, Ambassador of France to Yerevan for his valuable support to my Turkish-Armenian initiatives, and to Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory William J.H
    NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 6 Article 5 Number 2 Volume 6, No. 2, 1985 1985 The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory William J.H. Hough III Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hough, William J.H. III (1985) "The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 6 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol6/iss2/5 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE ANNEXATION OF THE BALTIC STATES AND ITS EFFECT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAW PROHIBITING FORCIBLE SEIZURE OF TERRITORY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 303 II. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LAW PROHIBITING FORCIBLE SEIZURE OF TERRITORY ................................ 305 A. European Origins ............................... 305 B. Legal Development After the Peace of Westphalia 308 C. Title to Territory in the Colonial Era ............ 319 D. Post World War I Development .................. 321 E. Birth of the Stimson Doctrine of Nonrecognition of Forcible Seizure of Territory ..................... 326 III. THE ANNEXATION OF THE BALTIC STATES ................. 351 A. Origins of the Baltic States ...................... 351 B. Independence of the Baltic States ................ 355 C. Soviet Invasion and Incorporation of the Baltic S ta tes .......................................... 369 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Sino-European Relations During the Cold War and the Rise of a Multipolar World
    SINO-EUROPEAN RELATIONS DURING THE COLD WAR AND THE RISE OF A MULTIPOLAR WORLD Edited by Enrico Fardella, Christian F. Ostermann, and Charles Kraus With a foreword by Her Excellency Federica Mogherini History and Public Policy Program Critical Oral History Conference Series SINO-EUROPEAN RELATIONS DURING THE COLD WAR AND THE RISE OF A MULTIPOLAR WORLD A Critical Oral History Edited by Enrico Fardella, Christian F. Ostermann, and Charles Kraus With a foreword by Her Excellency Federica Mogherini The Wilson Center graciously acknowledges the financial support of the following organizations which made this publication possible: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org ISBN# 978-1-938027-98-7 Cover image: Sun Suozhang (left) and Roy Denman (right) sign an agreement promoting trade between the European Economic Community and the People’s Republic of China on February 3, 1978. Source: European Commission Audiovisual Services P-004296/02-13. © 2015 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars The History and Public Policy Program provides a forum for the discussion of new, policy-relevant historical evidence and findings and fosters open, informed and non-partisan research and dialogue on the relationship between history and policy-making. A hub for a global network of scholars, journalists, policy-makers, archivists, and teachers, the Program maintains an award-winning Digital Archive (www.DigitalArchive.org) which contains thousands of historical documents and provides fresh, unprecedented insights into the inner workings and foreign policies of the US and foreign powers. The Wilson Center, chartered by Congress as the official memorial to President Woodrow Wilson, is the nation’s key non-partisan policy forum for tackling global issues through independent research and open dialogue to inform actionable ideas for Congress, the Administration and the broader policy community.
    [Show full text]
  • Brandt and the Policy of Ostpolitik
    Brandt and the policy of Ostpolitik Learning objective: to identify how relations between East and West Germany improved Today’s Challenges summarise Brandt’s career examine Ostpolitik policy assess the success of Brandt’s policy Key learning: Why was Willy Brandt important in causing the reunification of Germany? LO: Starter: Complete To describe the Cold War tension your date, key which surrounded Berlin 4/5 learning and starter sheet. Be To explain how Willy Brandt ready to share improved relations with your ideas! East Germany and the USSR 6/7 To evaluate the success of Willy Brandt’s policies 8/9 Disagreements over how to deal with the German Disagreements over how to deal with the German question resulted in tension and arguments that led to question resulted in tension and arguments that led to the Cold War. the Cold War. Stalin’s fear of a strong unified Germany put him at odds Stalin’s fear of a strong unified Germany put him at odds with American policy to establish an economically strong with American policy to establish an economically strong state which was able to trade effectively and freely with state which was able to trade effectively and freely with the West. the West. The resulting Berlin blockade increased tension further, The resulting Berlin blockade increased tension further, with the possibility of Marshall Aid planes being shot with the possibility of Marshall Aid planes being shot down by the Red Army. down by the Red Army. The poor relations between East and West Germany and The poor relations between East and West Germany and the dangerous Cold War atmosphere of the Berlin Wall the dangerous Cold War atmosphere of the Berlin Wall persuaded some West German politicians to find ways of persuaded some West German politicians to find ways of improving relations between east and west.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany's Ostpolitik and the Road to Helsinki Egon Bahr
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2005, Baden-Baden 2006, pp. 23-28. Egon Bahr Germany’s Ostpolitik and the Road to Helsinki To some extent, it is a miracle that, 30 years after the Helsinki Final Act, there is anything to commemorate at all. Previous events made it appear unlikely that a conference would ever be founded in the first place. In 1954, Vyacheslav Molotov, the then Soviet For- eign Minister, had proposed a pan-European security conference. This pro- posal, which aimed in part at disrupting the accession of the Federal Republic of Germany to NATO, set to take place the following year, could easily be rejected, as it – quite unrealistically – did not provide for the participation of the USA. In 1964, when Poland proposed to the United Nations that discus- sions should be held on a system of European security, this was considered to be a reflection of that country’s interest in détente. Two years later, the War- saw Pact adopted a “Declaration on Strengthening Peace and Security in Europe”, which was approved by the Communist parties at a meeting several months later. NATO now reacted by producing the Harmel Report, which asserted the complementarity of détente and defence. After the erection of the Berlin Wall, Willy Brandt had consistently ar- gued that co-operation with the East needed to follow West Germany’s inte- gration in the West. In his view, there were several reasons why it was in the interest of both Germany and the peoples of Eastern Europe to promote eco- nomic co-operation and facilitate human contacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachèle Raus, Willy Brandt's Ostpolitik and European Integration
    Rachèle Raus, Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik and European integration Source: Rachèle Raus, Université de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris (2005). Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/rachele_raus_willy_brandt_s_ostpolitik_and_european_inte gration-en-076ebcb2-853c-488a-8a68-4432a35028c9.html Last updated: 05/07/2016 1/7 Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik and European integration by Rachèle Raus, doctoral student at the University of Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne. Studies of the post-1945 foreign policy of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) are often divided into those focusing on its European integration policy and those which cover its policy of openness towards Eastern Europe, putting more emphasis on the latter, the ‘Ostpolitik’, than on the former, the ‘Europapolitik’. However, with recent studies confirming the role of European integration in peacemaking within Europe and the involvement of the Ostpolitik in the East-West détente process, this imbalance in the historiography of West Germany can no longer be justified. It is important to determine whether these two policies both addressed the same desire to soothe post-war tensions and to promote the establishment of peace in Europe. The extent to which they overlapped was clearly illustrated with the implementation of the foreign policy pursued by the FRG’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, and later Chancellor, Willy Brandt, who closely reconciled the Ostpolitik and the Westpolitik and declared in 1969 that the Ostpolitik was the ‘eastern component of his European policy’.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Dossier No. 17 Negotiating One's Own Demise?
    e-Dossier No. 17 Negotiating one's own demise? The GDR's Foreign Ministry and the CSCE negotiations Plans, preparations, tactics and presumptions by Oliver Bange and Stephan Kieninger1 The GDR played a central role in the CSCE negotiations. Despite initial successes in the early 1970s, détente turned out to be a mixed blessing for the GDR. On the one hand – after the inner-German modus vivendi – the CSCE negotiations enabled Honecker's new leadership team to participate in international politics without any discrimination. The CSCE Final Act brought about the GDR's international recognition as the legitimate second German state. On the other hand the German question – being prevalent in the background of the CSCE talks – remained undecided. The Helsinki Final Act was no "Ersatz peace".2 Bonn's social-liberal government succeeded in its revisionist efforts to have established in the Helsinki Final Act's catalogues of principles a regulation about the peaceful change of frontiers,3 clearly aiming at German reunification and the demise of the GDR. Furthermore – in a kind of tit-for-tat deal – in return for Western recognition of the status quo, the Soviet Union and its Allies had to accept what became basket III of the Final Act: freer movement of people, information and ideas. Freer movement was synonymous with Western efforts to penetrate the Soviet orbit and 1 Oliver Bange is currently coordinating an international history project, "CSCE and the Transformation of Europe", funded by the VolkswagenStiftung, at the University of Mannheim, Germany (http://www.CSCE- 1975.net). Stephan Kieninger is a doctoral student at the University of Mannheim, currently preparing his thesis on "The conflict of stratagems in Washington over the meaning and purpose of CSCE and MBFR, 1969- 1975".
    [Show full text]