DOCSLIB.ORG

Michel Foucault and the Production of American

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Michel Foucault and the Production of American READING THE STATE WRITING: MICHEL FOUCAULT AND THE PRODUCTION OF AMERICAN POLITICAL CULTURE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kirk S. Kidwell, B.A., M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Debra Moddelmog, Adviser Professor James Phelan ___________________________________ Professor Amy Shuman Adviser Department of English Copyright by Kirk S. Kidwell 2003 ABSTRACT In this dissertation, I seek to answer two critical questions. First, what transformations have occurred in American political culture such that, in 1798, when the U.S. Congress enacted one of the first pieces of health-related legislation the heart of the debate was whether providing for the health care of the citizenry was a legitimate object for governmental action, but when, 200 years later, Congress debates health care legislation the issue is no longer whether the state should take action but what action the state should take? Second, what form would a Foucauldian approach to this question take and what answers would such an approach produce? Accordingly, the dissertation has a two-fold focus: (1) an analysis of Michel Foucault’s methodologies of archaeology and genealogy and of his thought concerning discourse, power, and government; (2) a deployment of that analysis in an investigation of the production of American political culture since the founding of the American Republic in 1787-1788. In other words, the critical problem the dissertation addresses concerns the development and application of Foucauldian critical methodologies to the analysis of American political culture. Chapter One introduces both the investigation of Foucault’s thought about political culture and the critique of American political culture through an analysis of Understanding AIDS, a brochure the federal government sent to every household in the nation in 1988. The second chapter offers a close reading of Foucault’s genealogy of Western political culture in order to establish a (Foucauldian) theory of bio-political culture. Chapter Three ii extends this investigation by reworking Foucault’s theory of discourse and by deploying that theory in an archaeological analysis of the political discourse circulating during the debate over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. In the final chapter, I offer a genealogical analysis of the emergence of American bio-political culture during the first decades of the twentieth century, based upon Foucault’s concept of power and power- knowledge relations. I conclude the dissertation by considering how the theory of political culture and the methodology for reading political cultural discourses and practices which I have developed might be used to analyze other state bio-political campaigns. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank, first, my parents, without whose help and support none of this would have been possible. I especially want to thank my adviser, Debra Moddelmog, whose assistance throughout the long process of researching and writing this dissertation has been invaluable. I also want to express my appreciation for the other members of my dissertation committee, James Phelan and Amy Shuman, for their insights and encouragement. And I would like to acknowledge the many members of the English Department at The Ohio State University with whom I have worked since I began as an undergraduate student, including Mark Conroy, Anthony Libby, Marlene Longenecker, David Riede, and Susan Williams. iv VITA April 28, 1957 ................................................Born – Columbus, Ohio 1992................................................................B.A. English, The Ohio State University 1996................................................................M.A. English, The Ohio State University 1993 – 1997....................................................Graduate Teaching Associate, English The Ohio State University 1997 – 2002....................................................Instructor, English University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire 2002 - 2003 ....................................................Graduate Teaching Associate, English The Ohio State University FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: English v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iv Vita.......................................................................................................................................v Chapters: Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 1. The Critique of Political Culture: Michel Foucault and Understanding AIDS....................................................................9 2. Life, Population, Government: Toward a Foucauldian Theory of Bio-Political Culture ..............................................58 3. “We the People . Do Ordain and Establish”; Discourse and the Ratification of the U.S. Constitution, 1787-1788 ........................144 4. The State as Pastor: Power and the Emergence of American Bio-Political Culture ..................................231 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................299 List of References ............................................................................................................305 vi INTRODUCTION In 1798, the U.S. Congress debated one of the first proposed pieces of health- related legislation—the Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen—which would impose a twenty cent per month tax on the wages of seamen to establish a national fund to provide health care for seamen and to erect hospitals for their use. Though the bill was ultimately enacted and signed into law by President George Washington, it occasioned considerable debate in Congress, a debate that reveals a great deal about the political culture of the early American Republic. At the heart of the debate was the question of whether providing for the health care of the citizenry was a legitimate object for governmental action, and especially action by the federal government. For opponents, the legislation marked an intrusion of the national government into the internal affairs of state governments. Rep. Joseph B. Varnum of Massachusetts, for example, confessed that “he did not know but that the United States have the power to make the proposed regulation; but he thought it was a business which more particularly concerned the Legislatures of the individual State” (Annals of Congress 1851, 1391). Similarly, Representative Samuel Sewall, also of Massachusetts opposed the bill because his state already had in place a system to care for the health of sailors. The problem was not with the states of New England, which furnished nearly two-thirds of the sailors serving on American ships, but rather with 1 states in the South which had no mechanism to provide for sailors who fell ill or were injured. Accordingly, the solution, in Sewall’s view, was not to have the federal government create a national system; instead, those states which had failed to address the needs of sailors ought to establish a system like that of the New England states. For Sewall, the provision of health care for sailors or any other American citizen was simply not the responsibility of the federal government. Proponents of the legislation countered that the problem was indeed a national one; sailors put into port cities all along the Atlantic seaboard and could easily find themselves sick or disabled in any state. So meeting this need was the responsibility of the federal government, not the state. Further, the legislation was debated in terms of not only the appropriateness of federal action but also the objects of that action. Were sailors a unique class of American citizens who were incapable of caring for themselves and therefore in need of special assistance? Representative Edward Livingston of New York argued that sailors were indeed such a class: “A sailor . is concerned only for the present, and is incapable of thinking of, or inattentive to, future welfare; he is, therefore, a proper object for the care of Government, and whilst he can provide an asylum for infirmity or old age, by the sacrifices of a few gills of rum, he will not scruple to do it” (Annals of Congress 1798, 1388). By contrast, Representative Albert Gallatin of Pennsylvania contended that he “had not seen this distinction between them and other classes of citizens, and, therefore, believed them to be capable of taking care of themselves” (1392). For yet others, the issue was not whether sailors were a special class of citizens meriting governmental assistance, but whether government, federal or state, was responsible for providing for the health care of the American people. Sewall, for instance, maintained that this was a 2 matter of “public charity” (1386). Sailors ought not to be taxed for their health care, nor should government be involved; instead, “the laws of reason and charity called upon the public at large in support of unfortunate men of this description” (1386). Similarly, Varnum held that if sailors merited assistance, “the people at large . ought to be called upon to support them
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Public Intellectualism: the Rhetorics of Student Scientist-Activists
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses November 2016 Sustainable Public Intellectualism: The Rhetorics of Student Scientist-Activists Jesse Priest University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Rhetoric and Composition Commons Recommended Citation Priest, Jesse, "Sustainable Public Intellectualism: The Rhetorics of Student Scientist-Activists" (2016). Doctoral Dissertations. 796. https://doi.org/10.7275/9006735.0 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/796 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC INTELLECTUALISM: THE RHETORICS OF STUDENT SCIENTIST-ACTIVISTS A Dissertation Presented by JESSE PRIEST Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2016 English ©Copyright by Jesse Priest 2016 All Rights Reserved Sustainable Public Intellectualism: Rhetorics of Student Scientist-Activists A Dissertation Presented By JESSE PRIEST Approved as to style and content by: ________________________________ David Fleming, Chair ________________________________ Anne Herrington, Member ________________________________ Martha Stassen, Outside Member ________________________________ Jenny Spencer, Chair Department of English ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to my committee members David, Anne, and Martha for your patience and for each in your own way showing me the best of the academic community. Thanks as well to my academic advisors who supported me throughout my time at UMass: especially Donna LeCourt, Haivan Hoang, Anne Bello, and Rebecca Lorimer Leonard.
    [Show full text]
  • CRESSI Working Papers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Oxford University, Saïd Business School: Eureka CRESSI Working papers The CRESSI project explores the economic underpinnings of social innovation with a particular focus on how policy and practice can enhance the lives of the most marginalized and disempowered citizens in society. CRESSI Working Papers No. 28/2016 Forms of power, European empires and globalizations. Michael Mann’s The Sources of Social Power and beyond. By Risto Heiskala Chapter 8 of Deliverable D1.1: Report on Institutions, Social Innovation & System Dynamics from the Perspective of the Marginalised. Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation” (CRESSI) has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613261. CRESSI Working Paper no. 28/2016 – D1.1 Forms of power, European empires and globalizations. Michael Mann’s The Sources of Social Power and beyond (September 2016) Page 1 | 22 The CRESSI project explores the economic underpinnings of social innovation with a particular focus on how policy and practice can enhance the lives of the most marginalised and disempowered citizens in society. “Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation” (CRESSI) has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613261. CRESSI is a collaboration between eight European institutions led by the University of Oxford and will run from 2014-2018. This paper reflects the authors’ views and the European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained here within.
    [Show full text]
  • Underdevelopment and Unregulated Markets: Seven Reasons Why Unregulated Markets Reproduce Underdevelopment
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Herr, Hansjörg Working Paper Underdevelopment and unregulated markets: Seven reasons why unregulated markets reproduce underdevelopment Working Paper, No. 103/2018 Provided in Cooperation with: Berlin Institute for International Political Economy (IPE) Suggested Citation: Herr, Hansjörg (2018) : Underdevelopment and unregulated markets: Seven reasons why unregulated markets reproduce underdevelopment, Working Paper, No. 103/2018, Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/178653 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Key words: underdevelopment, financial system, free trade, inequality, Keynesian paradigm, Washington Consensus. JEL classification: B50, F40, O11 Contact: Hansjörg Herr email: [email protected] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution
    THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ROOTS OF THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann edited by GIDEON FREUDENTHAL PETER MCLAUGHLIN 13 Editors Preface Gideon Freudenthal Peter McLaughlin Tel Aviv University University of Heidelberg The Cohn Institute for the History Philosophy Department and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Schulgasse 6 Ramat Aviv 69117 Heidelberg 69 978 Tel Aviv Germany Israel The texts of Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann assembled in this volume are important contributions to the historiography of the Scientific Revolution and to the methodology of the historiography of science. They are of course also historical documents, not only testifying to Marxist discourse of the time but also illustrating typical European fates in the first half of the twentieth century. Hessen was born a Jewish subject of the Russian Czar in the Ukraine, participated in the October Revolution and was executed in the Soviet Union at the beginning of the purges. Grossmann was born a Jewish subject of the Austro-Hungarian Kaiser in Poland and served as an Austrian officer in the First World War; afterwards he was forced to return to Poland and then because of his revolutionary political activities to emigrate to Germany; with the rise to power of the Nazis he had to flee to France and then America while his family, which remained in Europe, perished in Nazi concentration camps. Our own acquaintance with the work of these two authors is also indebted to historical context (under incomparably more fortunate circumstances): the revival of Marxist scholarship in Europe in the wake of the student movement and the pro- fessionalization of history of science on the Continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies of Narrative Disclosure in the Rhetoric of Anti-Corporate Campaigns." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2012
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Communication Dissertations Department of Communication Spring 3-20-2012 Strategies of Narrative Disclosure in the Rhetoric of Anti- Corporate Campaigns Richard A. Herder Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/communication_diss Recommended Citation Herder, Richard A., "Strategies of Narrative Disclosure in the Rhetoric of Anti-Corporate Campaigns." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2012. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/communication_diss/32 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Communication at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATEGIES OF NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE IN THE RHETORIC OF ANTI-CORPORATE CAMPAIGNS by RICHARD ALEXANDER HERDER Under the Direction of Dr. Michael Bruner ABSTRACT In the years following World War II social activists learned to refine rhetorical techniques for gaining the attention of the new global mass media and developed anti-corporate campaigns to convince some of the world’s largest companies to concede to their demands. Despite these developments, rhetorical critics have tended to overlook anti-corporate campaigns as objects of study in their own right. One can account for the remarkable success of anti-corporate campaigns by understanding how activists have practiced prospective narrative disclosure, a calculated rhetorical wager that, through the public circulation of stories and texts disclosing problematic practices and answerable decision makers, activists can influence the policies and practices of prominent corporations. In support of this thesis, I provide case studies of two anti-corporate campaigns: the Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday November 14, 2012
    Wednesday November 14, 2012 8:00 AM 002024 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Dolphin Europe 7 - Third/Lobby Level SEMINAR: Celebrating the COMMunity that Diversely “Does Disney”: Multi -disciplinary and Multi -institutional Approaches to Researching and Teaching About the "World" of Disney Sponsor: Seminars Chairs: Mary-Lou Galician, Arizona State University; Amber Hutchins, Kennesaw State University Presenters: Emily Adams, Abilene Christian University Sharon D. Downey, California State Univ, Long Beach Erika Engstrom, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Sandy French, Radford University Mary-Lou Galician, Arizona State University Cerise L. Glenn, Univ of North Carolina, Greensboro Jennifer A. Guthrie, University of Kansas Jennifer Hays, University of Bergen, Norway Amber Hutchins, Kennesaw State University Jerry L. Johnson, Buena Vista University Lauren Lemley, Abilene Christian University Debra Merskin, University of Oregon David Natharius, Arizona State University Tracey Quigley Holden, University of Delaware Kristin Scroggin, University of Alabama, Huntsville David Zanolla, Western Illinois University 002025 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM Dolphin Europe 8 - Third/Lobby Level SEMINAR: COMMunity Impact: Defining the Discipline and Equipping Our Students to Make Everyday Differences Sponsor: Seminars Chair: Darrie Matthew Burrage, Univ of Colorado, Boulder Presenters: Jeremy R. Grossman, University of Georgia Margaret George, Univ of Colorado, Boulder Katie Kethcart, Colorado State University Ashton Mouton, Purdue University Emily Sauter, University of Wisconsin, Madison Eric Burrage, University of Pittsburgh 002027 8:00 AM to 3:45 PM Dolphin Europe 10 - Third/Lobby Level SEMINAR: The Dissertation Writing Journey Sponsor: Seminars Chairs: Sonja K. Foss, Univ of Colorado, Denver; William Waters, University of Houston, Downtown 8:30 AM 003007 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM Dolphin Oceanic 3 - Third/Lobby Level PC02: Moving Methodology: 2012 Organizational Communication Division Preconference Sponsor: Preconferences Presenters: Karen Lee Ashcraft, University of Colorado, Boulder J.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Rhetoric of Cosmopolitanism: a Case Study of Thai Students at Michigan Technological University
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2019 Digital Rhetoric of Cosmopolitanism: A Case Study of Thai Students at Michigan Technological University Aranya Srijongjai Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2019 Aranya Srijongjai Recommended Citation Srijongjai, Aranya, "Digital Rhetoric of Cosmopolitanism: A Case Study of Thai Students at Michigan Technological University", Open Access Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2019. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/833 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Rhetoric Commons DIGITAL RHETORIC OF COSMOPOLITANISM: A CASE STUDY OF THAI STUDENTS AT MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY By Aranya Srijongjai A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Rhetoric, Theory and Culture MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Aranya Srijongjai This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Rhetoric, Theory and Culture. Department of Humanities Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Karla Kitalong Committee Member: Dr. Ronald Strickland Committee Member: Dr. Marika Seigel Committee Member: Dr. Beatrice Smith Committee Member: Dr. Chanon Adsanatham Department Chair: Dr. Ronald Strickland Table of Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dissertation 7-20.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of English AT THE INTERSECTION OF UTOPIA AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE SPATIAL-RHETORICAL NEGOTIATIONS OF 19TH-CENTURY WOMEN A Dissertation in English by Michelle C. Smith ! 2010 Michelle C. Smith Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2010 The dissertation of Michelle C. Smith was reviewed and approved* by the following: Cheryl Glenn Liberal Arts Research Professor of English Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee John L. Selzer Professor of English Hester Blum Associate Professor of English Melissa Wright Associate Professor of Geography Robert E. Burkholder Associate Professor of English Associate Head of the Department of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT The primary goal of this dissertation is to understand the role of space in women’s participation in 19th-century intentional communities and publics. Through their participation in 19th-century utopian experiments, my subjects were exposed to unconventional ideas about space, gender, labor, and community. Like many other participants in such communities, my subjects also formed rhetorical alliances with larger American communities concerned with business, politics, and social norms. The project follows these rhetorical trajectories from utopian space to the public sphere, guided by my overarching question: how does space affect the rhetorical alliances of 19th-century women? Following the theoretical and methodological orientation in Chapter Two, I go on to examine three female rhetors, drawing from their published writings and speeches and archival sources within their communities or pertaining to the women themselves. Chapter Three explores the infamous Frances Wright.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing in the Flow: Assembling Tactical Rhetorics in an Age of Viral Circulation
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Dustin Wayne Edwards Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ James Porter, Director ______________________________________ Heidi McKee, Reader ______________________________________ Jason Palmeri, Reader ______________________________________ Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ James Coyle, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT WRITING IN THE FLOW: ASSEMBLING TACTICAL RHETORICS IN AN AGE OF VIRAL CIRCULATION by Dustin W. Edwards From prompts to share, update, and retweet, social media platforms increasingly insist that creating widespread circulation is the operative goal for networked writing. In response, researchers from multiple disciplines have investigated digital circulation through a number of lenses (e.g., affect theory, transnational feminism, political economy, public sphere theory, and more). In rhetoric and writing studies, scholars have argued that writing for circulation—i.e., envisioning how one’s writing may gain speed, distance, and momentum—should be a prime concern for teachers and researchers of writing (e.g., Gries, 2015; Ridolfo & DeVoss, 2009; Porter, 2009; Sheridan, Ridolfo, & Michel, 2012). Such work has suggested that circulation is a consequence of rhetorical delivery and, as such, is distinctly about futurity. While a focus on writing for circulation has been productive, I argue that that writing in circulation can be equally productive. Challenging the tendency to position circulation as an exclusive concern for delivery, this project argues that circulation is not just as an end goal for rhetorical activity but also as a viable inventional resource for writers with diverse rhetorical goals. To make this case, I construct a methodology of assemblage to retell stories of tactical rhetorics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Haunting Past
    The Haunting Past The Afterlife of the Communist Secret Services The Haunting Past The Afterlife of the Communist Secret Services International Conferences in the Hamvas Institute Hamvas Institute, 2010 Contents Ágnes Hankiss Introductory Thoughts 7 László Kövér Opening Speech 18 Amy Knight The Legacy of Secret Police in Post-Communist States 24 Jörn Mothes The Political Injustices Committed in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) 34 Wojciech Roszkowszki The Oleksy Case and the Role of Secret Services in Polish Politics 45 Vitalij Sentalinszkij Crime Without Punishment, Russia in the 20th Century 53 Sándor Őze State Security Control in Hungarian Historiography from 1956 to the Change of Regime 61 Alex Standish Russian Intelligence Strategy Towards Post-Communist Europe Under Vladimir Putin: Partners or Predators? 83 Marius Oprea The Fifth Power: Transition of the Romanian Securitate from Communism to NATO 102 Piotr Naimski Poland Fifteen Years After the Round Table: Where is the End of the Transition? 121 György Schöpflin The Right and Post-Communism 135 Notes 146 Biographies 153 Ágnes Hankiss Introductory Thoughts Culture, if the term is not restricted unnecessarily to matters of intellec- tual education or arts, is actually nothing else but the embodiment of the zeitgeist that permeates, and even creates, either furtively or stentoriously people’s actual character, behaviour, attitude, daily life and the complete social institutional system they are part of. Regime change of 1989 is change of culture. Have we succeeded in ful- filling it? Have we done it in depth or just superficially? It seems to be a fair question as changes in spirit and mind are significantly slower than transfor- mations of the economy or of institutional, legal systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Purdue University
    Purdue University English 680r: Public Rhetorics Spring 2009 Wednesdays, 11:30-2:20, Heavilon 111 Instructor: Patricia Sullivan Office: Heavilon 401 Office Hours: 3-4:30 on Friday (and on most Weds) preferred email: [email protected] website: http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~psulliva Positioning Public Rhetorics is the anchor seminar of the new secondary area in Public Rhetoric. Our aim in developing cognate coursework in Public Rhetoric is to add depth to a domain of written literacy studies, and therefore extend the graduate program’s repetoire. As we view Shirley Brice Heath’s typology for the domains of literacy—home, school, community, and work—Purdue’s Graduate Program already offers in-depth work in school [WPA] and work [PTW] and the faculty [along with most of the field] are not interested in probing home literacy. So, Public Rhetoric is intended to provide in-depth investigation of Heath’s domain of “community”. Of course, we rename it to fit our view of perimeters that interest us. It is not lost on us that renaming has its consequences; so, one goal of the course is to explore the impacts of various naming activities at the field level. We call this seminar Public RhetoricS to emphasize the plurality of constituitive views about how one might write/speak/communicate to a public or even assemble a public that fits with what one wants to write/speak/say. Yes, we could have pluralized Public as well (which you quickly realize reading Warner), except for the grammatical horror that would ensue— a collective of plurals might invite “fear and trembling” on our parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Clusters for a Theory of Concepts of Communications. Historical
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive “Parallel Worlds“. Clusters for a Theory of Concepts of Communications. Historical Intercultural and Cultural Comparative Studies in Perspectives of National and Transnational Constitutions, Values, Concepts, and Terms of ‘Communication’ - ‘Orality’ - ‘Literacy’ - ‘Rhetoric’ - ‘Media’. Haase, Fee-Alexandra 1 January 2008 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6534/ MPRA Paper No. 6534, posted 03 Jan 2008 05:34 UTC Fee-Alexandra Haase “Parallel Worlds“ Clusters for a Theory of Concepts of Communications. Historical Intercultural and Cultural Comparative Studies in Perspectives of National and Transnational Constitutions, Values, Concepts, and Terms of ‘Communication’ - ‘Orality’ - ‘Literacy’ - ‘Rhetoric’ - ‘Media’ 1 Communication is Health; Communication is Truth; Communication is Happiness. To share is our Duty; Virginia Woolf The Common Reader, Chapter 6 2 - Index - 0. Introduction: Communications and Cultural Heritage – Facing the Post-Postmodern Condition 4 1. Diachronic European Perspectives on Communications 28 1.1. The Perspective of Ancient Greece on Communications 28 1.2. The Roman Perspective on Communications 43 1.3. The Perspective of Communications in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Time 56 1.4. The Perspective of Communications in the Renaissance 79 1.5. The Perspective of Communications in Europe in the 16th and 17th Century 94 1.6. The Perspective of Communications in Europe in the 18th Century 112 1.7. The Perspective of Communications in Europe in the 19th Century 123 1.8. The Perspective of Communications in Europe in the 20th Century 134 1.9. The Perspective of Communications in Europe in the 21st Century 157 II. Synchronic Perspectives of Communications in Global Areas 179 2.
    [Show full text]