VARIETIES OF PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONS AND INTEREST INTERMEDIATION IN LATIN AMERICA Lindsay Mayka Jared Abbott Associate Professor of Government Post-Doctoral Research Fellow Colby College Center for Inter-American Policy and Research
[email protected] Tulane University
[email protected] Abstract: Most scholars assume that the objective of participatory institutions is to deepen democracy, improve the quality of governance, and enhance social inclusion, and existing studies highlight the litany of reasons why participatory institutions fail to meet this high bar for success. We diverge from this literature in questioning whether “success” for all participatory institutions means mobilizing the autonomous participation of marginalized groups to change policy outcomes in favor of the poor. Instead, we consider participatory institutions successful when they meet the political objectives they were created to advance. We develop a typology of four varieties of participatory institutions, which differ based on their foundational logics of interest intermediation and incorporation. Through case studies of participatory institutions in Brazil, Peru, Venezuela, and Ecuador, we show that participatory institutions can successfully restructure state-society relations in a range of ways, including increasing civil society influence over policymaking and government oversight, incorporating new voting blocs into parties’ electoral coalitions, and constraining the influence of disruptive social movements. Keywords: participatory institutions, good governance, participatory democracy, interest representation, civil society, citizen participation, party-voter linkages, policy change, Latin America Word count: 11,999 words Acknowledgements: We are grateful for feedback provided by Ruth Berins Collier, Kent Eaton, Tulia Falleti, Alisha Holland, Ben Goldfrank, Brian Palmer-Rubin, Jessica Rich, Ken Roberts, Rachel Schwartz, Heather Sullivan, Guillermo Toral, and participants in our 2021 REPAL panel.