DOCSLIB.ORG

Advanced Exploration Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration Advanced Exploration Systems 10 October 2017 JASON CRUSAN Director, Advanced Exploration Systems NASA Headquarters 1 2 PHASE 1 Deep Space Gateway (DSG) Concept Phase 2: Deep Space Transport Orion PHASE 2 Deep Space Gateway HABITATION CAPABILITY Systems to enable crews to live and work safely in deep space. Capabilities and systems will be used in conjunction with Orion and SLS on exploration missions in cislunar space and beyond. 5 DEEP SPACE HABITATION SYSTEMS TODAY FUTURE Habitation Systems Elements Space Station Deep Space LIFE SUPPORT Excursions from Earth are possible with artificially produced breathing air, drinking water and other conditions for survival. 42% O Recovery from CO 2 2 75%+ O2 Recovery from CO2 90% H O Recovery 2 98%+ H2O Recovery Atmosphere Waste Management Management < 6 mo mean time before failure >30 mo mean time before Water (for some components) failure Management ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING NASA living spaces are designed with controls and integrity that ensure the comfort and safety of inhabitants. Limited, crew-intensive On-board analysis capability on-board capability with no sample return Identify and quantify species Pressure Particles Chemicals Reliance on sample return to and organisms in air & water O & N Earth for analysis 2 2 Moisture Microbes Sound CREW HEALTH Astronauts are provided tools to perform successfully while preserving their well-being and long-term health. Bulky fitness equipment Smaller, efficient equipment Limited medical capability Onboard medical capability Monitoring Diagnostics Food Storage & Management Frequent food system resupply Long-duration food system Exercise Treatment EVA: EXTRA- Long-term exploration depends on the ability to physically investigate the unknown for VEHICULAR ACTIVITY resources and knowledge. High upper body mobility for limited Full body mobility for expanded sizing range sizing range Low interval between maintenance, Increased time between maintenance contamination sensitive, and cycles, contamination resistant system, 25% consumables limit EVA time increase in EVA time Mobility Science and Exploration Construction and repair focused tools; Geological sampling and surveying Life excessive inventory of unique tools equipment; common generic tool kit Support DEEP SPACE HABITATION SYSTEMS TODAY FUTURE Habitation Systems Elements Space Station Deep Space Node 2 crew quarters (CQ) with RADIATION During each journey, radiation from the sun and other sources poses a significant threat to polyethylene reduce impacts of proton Solar particle event storm shelter, humans and spacecraft. irradiation. PROTECTION Large multi-layer detectors & small pixel optimized position of on-board detectors – real-time dosimetry, environment materials and CQ monitoring, tracking, model validation & Small distributed pixel detector verification systems – real-time dosimetry, environment monitoring, and tracking Modeling Bulky gas-based detectors Monitoring – real-time dosimetry Tracking Mitigation Small actively read-out detectors for crew Small solid-state crystal detectors – real-time dosimetry – passive dosimetry (analyzed post-mission) FIRE SAFETY Throughout every mission, NASA is committed to minimizing critical risks to human safety. Large CO2 Suppressant Tanks Water Mist portable fire extinguisher 2-cartridge mask Single Cartridge Mask Detection Suppression Obsolete combustion prod. sensor Exploration combustion product Protection Cleanup monitor Only depress/repress clean-up Smoke eater LOGISTICS Sustainable living outside of Earth requires explorers to reduce, recycle, reuse, and repurpose materials. Manual scans, displaced items Automatic, autonomous RFID Disposable cotton clothing Long-wear clothing/laundry Tracking Packaging Packaging disposed Bags/foam repurposed w/3D printer Clothing Trash Bag and discard Resource recovery, then disposal CROSS-CUTTING Powerful, efficient, and safe launch systems will protect and deliver crews and materials across new horizons. Minimal on-board autonomy Ops independent of Earth & crew Near-continuous ground-crew Up to 40-minute comm delay communications Widespread common interfaces, Avionics, Some common interfaces, modules/systems integrated Robotics Communication Materials modules controlled separately Autonomy Manufacture replacement parts in & Software space Power Docking Thermal Industry Partnerships in Pursuit of NASA’s Strategic Goals • NextSTEP solicits studies, concepts, and technologies to demonstrate key capabilities on the International Space Station and for future human missions in deep space. Focus areas include: – life support systems, advanced electric propulsion systems, small satellites, commercial lunar landers, and in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) measurements and systems • Most NextSTEP efforts require some level of corporate cost- sharing. • This cost-sharing model of public-private partnerships stimulates the economy and fosters a stronger industrial base and commercial space market. 8 NEXTSTEP HABITATION OVERVIEW NextSTEP Phase 1: 2015-2016 Cislunar habitation concepts that leverage commercialization plans for LEO FOUR SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT CONCEPTS RECEIVED Partners develop required deliverables, including concept descriptions with concept of operations, NextSTEP Phase LOCKHEED MARTIN BIGELOW AEROSPACE ORBITAL ATK BOEING 2 proposals, and statements of work. NextSTEP Phase 2: 2016-2018 Initial discussions with international partners • Partners refine concepts and develop ground prototypes. ONE CONCEPT STUDY • NASA leads standards and common interfaces development. FIVE GROUND PROTOTYPES NANORACKS Phase 3: 2018+ BY 2018 BIGELOW AEROSPACE BOEING • Partnership and Acquisition approach, Define reference habitat leveraging domestic and international architecture in capabilities preparation for Phase 3. • Development of deep space habitation SIERRA NEVADA capabilities LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION ORBITAL ATK • Deliverables: flight unit(s) 9 FULL-SIZED GROUND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT DIFFERENT APPROACHES FOR BROAD TRADE SPACE OF OPTIONS Expandable Leverages Existing Technologies Builds on proven cargo spacecraft development Refurbishes Heritage Hardware Modular Buildup 10 NextSTEP Propulsion Developing propulsion technology systems in the 50- to 300-kW range to meet the needs of a variety of deep-space mission concepts Ad Astra Rocket Company: Aerojet Rocketdyne: MSNW: Variable Specific Impulse Nested Hall thruster Electrodeless Lorentz Force plasma Magnetoplasma Rocket thruster. (VASIMR). NextSTEP Habitation Systems NASA awarded seven habitation projects. Four will address habitat concept development, and three will address Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) Dynetics, Inc Hamilton Sundstrand Space Sierra Nevada Systems International Huntsville, AL Windsor Locks, CT Corporation/Orbitec Madison, WI Miniature atmospheric Larger, more modular Hybrid Life Support scrubbing system for long- ECLSS subsystems, Systems integrating duration exploration and requiring less integration established habitation applications. and maximize component Physical/Chemical life Separates CO2 and other commonality support with bioproduction undesirable gases from systems spacecraft cabin air 12 IN-SPACE MANUFACTURING ON-DEMAND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEEP SPACE MISSIONS 3-D printer installed on International Space Station in 2014. Crews aboard station have successfully used the printer to manufacture parts and tools on-demand. In-Space Manufacturing logo created through Freelancer crowd- sourced challenge. Issued new appendix to NextSTEP Broad Agency Announcement soliciting proposals for development of First student-designed 3-D tool printed first-generation, in-space, multi-material fabrication aboard station in 2016 laboratory, or FabLab, for space missions. 13 BIGELOW EXPANDABLE ACTIVITY MODULE TWO-YEAR HABITAT DEMONSTRATION 14 SPACECRAFT FIRE SAFETY EXPERIMENTS (SAFFIRE) Saffire-I&III: cotton-fiberglass blend burn sample measured 0.4 m wide by 1 meter long Saffire-II: nine samples in the experiment kit include a cotton-fiberglass blend, Nomex, and the same acrylic glass that is used for spacecraft windows 15 Harnessing Space-Based Resources In-situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Extracting volatiles or building materials from extraterrestrial soils (regolith). Extracting volatiles or consumables from extraterrestrial atmospheres. 16 CubeSats • Less expensive than traditional satellites • Appealing to new users – students, amateurs, non-space industry • Performance has rapidly improved CubeSat Launch at a low cost over the last 18 years Initiative • Are productive scientific spacecraft Provides launch opportunities to educational, non-profit organizations and NASA Centers that build CubeSats to fly as auxiliary payloads on previously planned missions or as International Space Station deployments. • 151 CubeSat missions selected • 85 organizations in 38 states • 42 CubeSats to be launched over the next 12 months 17 EM-1 Secondary Payloads 13 CUBESATS SELECTED TO FLY ON INTERIM EM-1 CRYOGENIC PROPULSION • Lunar Flashlight STAGE • Near Earth Asteroid Scout • Bio Sentinel • LunaH-MAP • CuSPP • Lunar IceCube • LunIR • EQUULEUS (JAXA) • OMOTENASHI (JAXA) • ArgoMoon (ESA) • STMD Centennial Challenge Winners 18 18 AES EM-1 Secondary Payloads: Strategic Knowledge Gaps and Key Technologies Strategic Knowledge Gaps Addressed Technologies Advanced BioSentinel • Deployable & Gimbaled Solar Arrays Human health/performance
Recommended publications
  • Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration

    Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration

    Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration Les Johnson NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center NASA Image We tend to think of space as being big and empty… NASA Image Space Is NOT Empty. We can use the environments of space to our advantage NASA Image Solar Sails Derive Propulsion By Reflecting Photons Solar sails use photon “pressure” or force on thin, lightweight, reflective sheets to produce thrust. 4 NASA Image Real Solar Sails Are Not “Ideal” Billowed Quadrant Diffuse Reflection 4 Thrust Vector Components 4 Solar Sail Trajectory Control Solar Radiation Pressure allows inward or outward Spiral Original orbit Sail Force Force Sail Shrinking orbit Expanding orbit Solar Sails Experience VERY Small Forces NASA Image 8 Solar Sail Missions Flown Image courtesy of Univ. Surrey NASA Image Image courtesy of JAXA Image courtesy of The Planetary Society NanoSail-D (2010) IKAROS (2010) LightSail-1 & 2 CanX-7 (2016) InflateSail (2017) NASA JAXA (2015/2019) Canada EU/Univ. of Surrey The Planetary Society Earth Orbit Interplanetary Earth Orbit Earth Orbit Deployment Only Full Flight Earth Orbit Deployment Only Deployment Only Deployment / Flight 3U CubeSat 315 kg Smallsat 3U CubeSat 3U CubeSat 10 m2 196 m2 3U CubeSat <10 m2 10 m2 32 m2 9 Planned Solar Sail Missions NASA Image NASA Image NASA Image Near Earth Asteroid Scout Advanced Composite Solar Solar Cruiser (2025) NASA (2021) NASA Sail System (TBD) NASA Interplanetary Interplanetary Earth Orbit Full Flight Full Flight Full Flight 100 kg spacecraft 6U CubeSat 12U CubeSat 1653 m2 86
  • Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020

    Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020

    Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020 Christopher Baker NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Executive National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 CHANGING THE PACE OF SPACE Through Small Spacecraft Technology and Flight Opportunities, Space Tech is pursuing the rapid identification, development, and testing of capabilities that exploit agile spacecraft platforms and responsive launch capabilities to increase the pace of space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2 THROUGH SUBORBITAL FLIGHT The Flight Opportunities program facilitates rapid demonstration of promising technologies for space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce through suborbital testing with industry flight providers LEARN MORE: WWW.NASA.GOV/TECHNOLOGY Photo Credit: Blue Origin National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3 FLIGHT OPPORTUNITIES BY THE NUMBERS Between 2011 and today… In 2019 alone… Supported 195 successful fights Supported 15 successful fights Enabled 676 tests of payloads Enabled 47 tests of payloads 254 technologies in the portfolio 86 technologies in the portfolio 13 active commercial providers 9 active commercial providers National Aeronautics and Space Administration Numbers current as of March 1, 2020 4 TECHNOLOGY TESTED IN SUBORBITAL Lunar Payloads ISS SPACE IS GOING TO EARTH ORBIT, THE MOON, MARS, AND BEYOND Mars 2020 Commercial Critical Space Lunar Payload Exploration Services Solutions National Aeronautics and Space Administration 5 SUBORBITAL INFUSION HIGHLIGHT Commercial Lunar Payload Services Four companies selected as Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CPLS) providers leveraged Flight Opportunities-supported suborbital flights to test technologies that are incorporated into their landers and/or are testing lunar landing technologies under Flight Opportunities for others.
  • China's Space Program

    China's Space Program

    China’s Space Program An Introduction China’s Space Program ● Motivations ● Organization ● Programs ○ Satellites ○ Manned Space flight ○ Lunar Exploration Program ○ International Relations ● Summary China’s Space Program Motivations Stated Purpose ● Explore outer space and to enhance understanding of the Earth and the cosmos ● Utilize outer space for peaceful purposes, promote human civilization and social progress, and to benefit the whole of mankind ● Meet the demands of economic development, scientific and technological development, national security and social progress ● Improve the scientific and cultural knowledge of the Chinese people ● Protect China's national rights and interests ● Build up China’s national comprehensive strength National Space Motivations • Preservation of its political system is overriding goal • The CCP prioritizes investments into space technology ○ Establish PRC as an equal among world powers ○ Space for international competition and cooperation ○ Manned spaceflight ● Foster national pride ● Enhance the domestic and international legitimacy of the CCP. ○ Space technology is metric of political legitimacy, national power, and status globally China’s Space Program Organization The China National Space Administration (CNSA) ● The China National Space Administration (CNSA, GuóJiā HángTiān Jú,) ○ National space agency of the People's Republic of China ○ Responsible for the national space program. ■ Planning and development of space activities. The China National Space Administration ● CNSA and China Aerospace
  • Highlights in Space 2010

    Highlights in Space 2010

    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
  • 7. Operations

    7. Operations

    7. Operations 7.1 Ground Operations The Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) team addressed the launch site integra- tion of the exploration systems. The team was fortunate to draw on expertise from members with historical and contemporary human space flight program experience including the Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Apollo Soyuz Test Project, Shuttle, and International Space Station (ISS) programs, as well as from members with ground operations experience reaching back to the Redstone, Jupiter, Pershing, and Titan launch vehicle programs. The team had a wealth of experience in both management and technical responsibilities and was able to draw on recent ground system concepts and other engineering products from the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) and Space Launch Initiative (SLI) programs, diverse X-vehicle projects, and leadership in NASA/Industry/Academia groups such as the Space Propulsion Synergy Team (SPST) and the Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG). 7.1.1 Ground Operations Summary The physical and functional integration of the proposed exploration architecture elements will occur at the primary launch site at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC). In order to support the ESAS recommendation of the use of a Shuttle-derived Cargo Launch Vehicle (CaLV) and a separate Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) for lunar missions and the use of a CLV for ISS missions, KSC’s Launch Complex 39 facilities and ground equipment were selected for conversion. Ground-up replacement of the pads, assembly, refurbishment, and/or process- ing facilities was determined to be too costly and time-consuming to design, build, outfit, activate, and certify in a timely manner to support initial test flights leading to an operational CEV/CLV system by 2011.
  • For Immediate Release: TWO GOOGLE LUNAR XPRIZE

    For Immediate Release: TWO GOOGLE LUNAR XPRIZE

    Media Contact: Kyoko Yonezawa [email protected] For Immediate Release: TWO GOOGLE LUNAR XPRIZE TEAMS ANNOUNCE RIDESHARE PARTNERSHIP FOR MISSION TO THE MOON IN 2016 Team HAKUTO (Japan) and Team Astrobotic (U.S.) Plan Cooperative Launch in Pursuit of $30 Million Prize to Land a Private Spacecraft on the Lunar Surface TOKYO, Japan (February 24, 2015) – HAKUTO, the only Japanese team competing for the $30 million Google Lunar XPRIZE, has announced a contract with fellow competitor, Astrobotic, based in Pittsburgh, Pa., to carry a pair of rovers to the moon. Astrobotic plans to launch its Google Lunar XPRIZE mission on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral, Fla., during the second half of 2016. HAKUTO’s twin rovers, Moonraker and Tetris, will piggyback on Astrobotic's Griffin lander to reach the lunar surface. Upon touchdown, the rovers will be released simultaneously with Astrobotic’s Andy rover, developed by Carnegie Mellon University, travel 500 meters on the moon’s surface and send high-definition images and video back to Earth, all in pursuit of the $20M Google Lunar XPRIZE Grand Prize. Last month, both teams were awarded Google Lunar XPRIZE Milestone Prizes: HAKUTO won $500,000 for technological advancements in the Mobility category, while Astrobotic, in partnership with Carnegie Mellon University, won a total of $1.75M for innovations in all three focus areas—Landing, Mobility and Imaging. Throughout the judging process, all three rovers, Moonraker, Tetris and Andy, demonstrated the ability to move 500 meters across the lunar surface and withstand the high radiation environment and extreme temperatures on the moon.
  • Space Act Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Moon Express Inc. for Lunar Catalyst Article 1

    Space Act Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Moon Express Inc. for Lunar Catalyst Article 1

    SPACE ACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AND MOON EXPRESS INC. FOR LUNAR CATALYST ARTICLE 1. AUTHORITY AND PARTIES In accordance with the National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113), this Agreement is entered into by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, located at 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546 (hereinafter referred to as "NASA") and Moon Express, Inc. located at 100 Space Port Way, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 (hereinafter referred to as "Partner" or "Moon Express"). NASA and Partner may be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties." ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE This agreement is an amended version of Space Act Agreement #18251, which went into effect on September 30, 2014. NASA recognizes that private-sector investment in technologies intended to enable commercial lunar activities has been increasing. In addition to recognizing these activities NASA wants to encourage and enable commercial successes to cultivate the increased innovation and entrepreneurship in the commercial space transportation sector. The “Lunar Cargo Transportation and Landing by Soft Touchdown” (Lunar CATALYST) initiative, is consistent with the National Space Transportation Policy. Per this policy, NASA is “committed to encouraging and facilitating a viable, healthy, and competitive U.S. Commercial space transportation industry”. This initiative also supports the internationally shared space exploration goals of the Global Exploration Roadmap (GER) that NASA and 11 other space agencies around the world released in August 2013. The GER acknowledges the value of public-private partnerships and commercial services to enable sustainable exploration of asteroids, the Moon and Mars.
  • Chang'e 5 Samples (Mexag) (Head-Final)

    Chang'e 5 Samples (Mexag) (Head-Final)

    Chang’E 5 Lunar Sample Return Mission Update James w. Head Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences Brown University Providence, RI 02912 USA Extraterrestrial Materials Analysis Group (ExMAG) Spring Meeting: April 7 - 8, 2021. Extraterrestrial Materials Analysis Group (ExMAG) Spring Meeting Barbara Cohen, ExMAG Chair. 2/10/21 • 1. Please provide an update on the Chang'e 5 Sample Return Mission. • 2. What is known of the collection so far? • 3. Please provide an overview of allocation procedures. • 4. Since US federally-funded researchers cannot work directly with China - Who outside of China is working with the mission team? • 5. We'd also appreciate your thoughts on: What NASA might be able to do to enable the US analysis community to collaborate on this sample collection? Extraterrestrial Materials Analysis Group (ExMAG) Spring Meeting Barbara Cohen, ExMAG Chair. 2/10/21 • 1. Some Myths and Realities. • 2. Organization of the Chinese Space Program. • 3. Chinese Lunar Exploration Program (CLEP) context for Chang’e 5. • 4. Chang’e 5 Landing Site Selection, Global Context, Key Questions, Mission Operations and Sample Return. • 5. Returned Sample Location, Storage, Preliminary Analysis and Distribution. • 6. Opportunities for International Cooperation. Extraterrestrial Materials Analysis Group (ExMAG) Spring Meeting Barbara Cohen, ExMAG Chair. 2/10/21 • 1. Some Myths and Realities. • 2. Organization of the Chinese Space Program. • 3. Chinese Lunar Exploration Program (CLEP) context for Chang’e 5. • 4. Chang’e 5 Landing Site Selection, Global Context, Key Questions, Mission Operations and Sample Return. • 5. Returned Sample Location, Storage, Preliminary Analysis and Distribution. • 6. Opportunities for International Cooperation.
  • NVIDIA Maximus Success Story NVIDIA Maximus Technology Helps Astrobotic Ignite New Era of Moon Exploration When the Google Luna

    NVIDIA Maximus Success Story NVIDIA Maximus Technology Helps Astrobotic Ignite New Era of Moon Exploration When the Google Luna

    NVIDIA Maximus Success Story NVIDIA Maximus Technology Helps Astrobotic Ignite New Era of Moon Exploration When the Google Lunar X PRIZE was announced in 2010, Astrobotic Technology was among the first to heed the call. The reward: a total of $30 million, the largest international incentive prize of all time, available to privately funded teams. The challenge: be the first to safely land a robot on the surface of the moon, control the robot to travel 500 meters over the lunar surface, and send high-definition (HD) video, images, and data back to earth. “Astrobotic is a bit like UPS, but for the moon,” said Jason Calaiaro, director of Information Systems for Astrobotic Technology. The company’s primary service is the delivery of payloads – scientific instruments, space agency exploration gear, data collection devices, etc. – to the lunar surface. The Lunar X PRIZE fit nicely with Astrobotic’s goals and business model and promises to provide some high-profile publicity to the company. To help keep its competitive dreams on track, Astrobotic needed to be able to do its complex robot design, structural and vibration analysis, and visualization more quickly and completely. The company upgraded its hardware to include NVIDIA® Maximus™ technology powering Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks, ANSYS, and MathWorks MATLAB software. Not only is this sophisticated technology helping position Astrobotic for Lunar X success, it is also helping to ramp up the company’s main commercial ventures. CHALLENGE Astrobotic was founded in 2008 as a spin-off from the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, PA, with the mission to build robots able to explore and deliver payloads to the moon, Mars, and beyond.
  • KPLO, ISECG, Et Al…

    KPLO, ISECG, Et Al…

    NationalNational Aeronautics Aeronautics and Space and Administration Space Administration KPLO, ISECG, et al… Ben Bussey Chief Exploration Scientist Human Exploration & Operations Mission Directorate, NASA HQ 1 Strategic Knowledge Gaps • SKGs define information that is useful/mandatory for designing human spaceflight architecture • Perception is that SKGs HAVE to be closed before we can go to a destination, i.e. they represent Requirements • In reality, there is very little information that is a MUST HAVE before we go somewhere with humans. What SKGs do is buy down risk, allowing you to design simpler/cheaper systems. • There are three flavors of SKGs 1. Have to have – Requirements 2. Buys down risk – LM foot pads 3. Mission enhancing – Resources • Four sets of SKGs – Moon, Phobos & Deimos, Mars, NEOs www.nasa.gov/exploration/library/skg.html 2 EM-1 Secondary Payloads 13 CUBESATS SELECTED TO FLY ON INTERIM EM-1 CRYOGENIC PROPULSION • Lunar Flashlight STAGE • Near Earth Asteroid Scout • Bio Sentinel • LunaH-MAP • CuSPP • Lunar IceCube • LunIR • EQUULEUS (JAXA) • OMOTENASHI (JAXA) • ArgoMoon (ESA) • STMD Centennial Challenge Winners 3 3 3 Lunar Flashlight Overview Looking for surface ice deposits and identifying favorable locations for in-situ utilization in lunar south pole cold traps Measurement Approach: • Lasers in 4 different near-IR bands illuminate the lunar surface with a 3° beam (1 km spot). Orbit: • Light reflected off the lunar • Elliptical: 20-9,000 km surface enters the spectrometer to • Orbit Period: 12 hrs distinguish water
  • SMALL SATELLITE CONFERENCE Thomas H

    SMALL SATELLITE CONFERENCE Thomas H

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration SMALL SATELLITE CONFERENCE Thomas H. Zurbuchen Associate Administrator NASA Science - SmallSat Strategy Science Mission Directorate, NASA August 6, 2018 SmallSats/CubeSats and NASA Science • Enabling New Science • Innovation • Cultivating Mission Success 5 News Stories! 2 NASA Science SOLAR Mission Directorate JASD SYSTEM An Integrated Program Enabling Great Science HELIOPHYSICS ASTROPHYSICS EARTH 3 PetitSat CeREs SPARCS SPORT AERO SORTIE HALOSAT BURSTCUBE CIRBE CUTE TBEx CuPID REAL Q-PACE CuSP IPEX CYGNSS HYTI MinXSS-2 OCSD PREFIRE ALBUS CURIE LLITED TEMPEST-D CUBERRT LAICE CLICK ICECUBE DALI GTOSat ELFIN CPOD CIRIS-BATC RAVAN NEASCOUT HARP ACS3 BIOSENTINEL TROPICS EARTH SCIENCE MC/COVE-2 HELIOPHYSICS PLANETARY SCIENCE CTIM-FD ASTROPHYSICS LUNAR ICECUBE SNOOPI TECHNOLOGY & EXPLORATION MARCO CUBEQUEST CSIM-FD FUTURE MISSIONS IN BOLD CHALLENGE CSUNSAT-1 LUNAH-MAP LUNIR GRIFEX LUNAR FLASHLIGHT RAINCUBE AUGUST 2018 5 ISARA ~$100M Yearly Investment for SmallSats/CubeSats • Nearly $100M yearly investment for SmallSats/CubeSats • Manage technology innovation by leveraging partnerships and commercial efforts across disciplines • Invest in innovative early-stage research and technology to promote economic growth 6 7 Corner of Thermal Blanket High Gain Antenna (HGA) Discover the Secrets Mars Cube One (MarCO) The View from Deep Space (MarCO-B) of the Universe Earth HGA Feed (Illuminated from HGA reflection) Shadow of HGA Feed Moon Corner of Thermal Blanket 8 Orbit ground track for 60 -day science phase:
  • Analysis of Illumination Conditions at the Lunar South Pole Using Parallel Computing Techniques

    Analysis of Illumination Conditions at the Lunar South Pole Using Parallel Computing Techniques

    Technische Universitat¨ Berlin Master Thesis Analysis of illumination conditions at the lunar south pole using parallel computing techniques Supervisors: Author: Dipl.-Ing. Philipp Glaser¨ Ramiro Marco figuera Prof. Dr. J¨urgen Oberst A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Planetary Geodesy Research Group Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science November 2014 Declaration of Authorship I, Ramiro Marco figuera, declare that this thesis titled, 'Analysis of illumination conditions at the lunar south pole using parallel computing techniques' and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University. Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated. Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly at- tributed. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. I have acknowledged all main sources of help. Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself. Signed: Date: i TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAT¨ BERLIN Abstract Faculty VI Planning - Building - Environment Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science Master of Science Analysis of illumination conditions at the lunar south pole using parallel computing techniques by Ramiro Marco figuera In this Master Thesis an analysis of illumination conditions at the lunar south pole using parallel computing techniques is presented.